From Defenders to Forwards: The MiG-31's Anniversary

19 185 102
From Defenders to Forwards: The MiG-31's Anniversary

Today we have an aircraft that is unique in many respects. And not even in terms of its performance characteristics, but in terms of its career. To go from defender to attacker like that—that's in stories aviation It didn't happen very often, and certainly not effectively. Perhaps the previous example would be the Su-7B, a fighter jet that was, to put it mildly, mediocre and unsuccessful in many respects. However, having switched to a bomber role, it not only served with gusto, but also gave birth to the very respectable Su-17, which served in our Air Force until 1998 and is still in service in other countries as the Su-22.

Something similar happened with the MiG-31, but it's hardly a failure. It's unique. And unique not because "it just happened that way," but because it was exactly the kind of aircraft the country needed.



In general, what did the Soviet Union need at that time?


The question is in the winged ones rockets, which began to firmly enter into common use. The new aircraft was created primarily to protect Soviet territory from cruise missile attacks from the Arctic, where there was no continuous radar coverage or airfield network.


A heavy loitering interceptor was needed, capable of detecting and engaging targets against the earth's surface in the altitude range from 100 m to 30 km using guided weapons.

The MiG-25 became the base model. An epochal aircraft, but not without its flaws. When the traitor Belenko stole a MiG-25 to Japan and the Americans studied the interceptor that had terrified the SR-71 Blackbird pilots, they were somewhat stunned by how such a fast aircraft was… a compromise, so to speak.


The MiG-25 was also a unique aircraft, created in defiance of many technical dogmas. It was designed by people who thought in terms of "if it's necessary, we'll do it," not "if it's possible." The rest of the world considered steel too heavy for a fighter, but Soviet engineers made it their primary material. When engines melted and couldn't handle their own power, they were forced to work using special alloys and titanium. Silicon transistors, delicate at the time, couldn't handle the stress and heat, so our engineers said, "To hell with them," and installed proven vacuum tubes. And with them, the MiG-25's radar "saw" further than many American counterparts.

And the result of the Mikoyan Design Bureau's extensive work was the MiG-25MP, now known worldwide as the MiG-31. You could say it's the next stage of development, but in essence, it's a completely different aircraft. In general, we're seeing a trend where modernization results in something truly incredible.

The MiG-31 is a completely new aircraft. New in its combat philosophy, aerodynamics, engines, and onboard equipment. And the external resemblance... The Su-35 also looks like the Su-27, so what?

The MiG-31's radical differences from the MiG-25 include its D-30F engines, targeting and navigation system, radar, and new-generation weapons. And finally, its two-person crew, with the navigator serving as the weapons operator.

The D-30F is a unique phenomenon in the world of engines. This engine is a modernized version of the one installed on the Tu-134 passenger jet. More precisely, a proven civil aviation engine served as the basis for the military engine. By upgrading the engines and adding an afterburner, thrust was increased from 6800 kgf in the original version to 15500 kgf with afterburner. However, the air intake cross-section had to be significantly enlarged compared to the MiG-25, as the D-30F consumed a much larger volume of air.


The speed of the MiG-31 became somewhat lower than that of the MiG-25, but the aircraft stopped guzzling fuel like crazy and became capable of “hovering” in a given area, making it suitable specifically for the role of a loitering interceptor.

Next up, we have the element that made the MiG-31 that exceptional aircraft. The SBI-16 "Zaslon" radar, the world's first phased-array radar installed on a production combat aircraft. This radar was developed for the Tu-148 heavy interceptor and the MiG-25PA interceptor.


The electronically scanned antenna was created at the Instrument-Making Research Institute, and the radar was developed at NPO Fazotron. The Zaslon system was a breakthrough at the time: it could simultaneously track up to ten airborne targets and simultaneously guide missiles with semi-active radar seekers to four of them, with the target's importance and priority determined automatically by the Argon-K onboard computer. Target detection range was up to 300 km.

The next important development was the availability of automated digital data transmission equipment RK-RLDN and APD-518. These systems could transmit information about detected targets to other aircraft or to ground control in real time, and the processor could compile data received from multiple Zaslon missiles into a single image.

In other words, the MiG-31 was already capable of serving as an AWACS aircraft back then. What capabilities the Zaslon-M offers to modern modifications remains anyone's guess.


Additionally, for covert interception, the MiG-31 is equipped with an infrared search and tracking system based on the 8TP thermal direction finder. The thermal direction finder is linked to the radar and provides target designation for R-40TD and R-60 IR-guided missiles. The maximum target detection range of the 8TP thermal direction finder in favorable conditions is 50 km.


Well weapon The equipment matched the weaponry. These included long-range R-33 missiles with a maximum range of 120 km. These were the longest-range missiles of the last century. Four missiles are mounted semi-recessed to the underside of the fuselage, and there are also underwing pylons—two under each wing. Eight missiles are more than enough to counter any threat.


Furthermore, missile launch could be controlled remotely from the ground. The Rubezh ground guidance station could use the MiG-31's weapons in director mode, providing target designation.

In the new century, the MiG-31 has undergone extensive modernization. The MiG-31BSM, which made its maiden flight in 2014, is a modification of the MiG-31BS to the MiG-31BM standard, which forms the core of the Russian Aerospace Forces' MiG-31 interceptor fleet.

Unlike the baseline MiG-31BS, the latest interceptor features a new combat control system, radar, and upgraded onboard computer, enabling it to detect targets at ranges of up to 320 km, track up to 10 targets, and engage six targets at ranges of up to 280 km. Naturally, it features multifunctional displays in the pilot and navigator cockpits, displaying tactical, navigational, and radar information.

And so, the interceptor, and not only the interceptor, turns exactly half a century old. The true lifespan of a combat aircraft is traditionally counted from the moment of its first successful flight. And exactly half a century ago, on September 16, 1975, Hero of the Soviet Union and test pilot Alexander Fedotov lifted the fourth-generation MiG-31 interceptor into the air from an airfield in Zhukovsky, near Moscow. From that moment on, the MiG-31's lifespan begins.


And the aircraft's life was a unique one. Its adversaries changed. At first, they were Tomahawk cruise missiles and B-1B Lancer supersonic bombers. Later, other targets emerged, but the MiG-31 long ago moved beyond being a "Tomahawk hunter."

The "Flying Headquarters," with its then-most powerful Zaslon radar, also helped guide other aircraft to their targets. Toward the end of the USSR, in 1985, RAC MiG developed the even more advanced MiG-31M, but it never went into production due to a complete lack of funding.

In 1994, the last MiG-31s ​​were assembled using airframes built during the Soviet era. Today, these aircraft are being upgraded to the MiG-31BSM and MiG-31K.

But more sophisticated modifications could have been viable. The MiG-31 somehow refused to age, and the surviving military enthusiasts continually developed new modifications. While isolated individuals showered the MiG-31 with increasingly beautiful nicknames, such as "a clumsy legacy of the Soviet era," this clumsy legacy never tired of holding the title of the fastest aircraft in the world, and the 31's altitude performance was perfectly fine.

It was the combination of “speed and altitude” that gave rise to such variants as the satellite fighter with the “Kontakt” complex in the MiG-31D modification, and the complex for launching small satellites into orbit with the experimental version of the MiG-31I.

And, naturally, the MiG-31K. In 2018, the MiG Corporation launched a MiG-31K modification. Its distinctive feature is the Kh-47M2 Kinzhal/Izdeliye 9-A-7660 hypersonic aeroballistic missile for attacking ground targets. To operate the Kinzhal, the aircraft received a new avionics suite, increased fuel capacity, and specialized communications equipment.


The Kh-47M2 Kinzhal missile is quite heavy (around 4 tons), which resulted in a shift in the aircraft's center of gravity and required a special pilot training program for takeoff with the missile attached.

With the advent of the Kinzhal, the MiG-31K was retrained as a heavy strike aircraft, which actually serves as the first stage of the missile.

The MiG-31K lifts the Kh-47M2 to an altitude of approximately 25 km and accelerates it to a speed of 3,000 km/h. The control system then assists the crew in guiding the aircraft to the optimal flight mode in terms of speed and altitude and initiates launch. After this, the aircraft's mass loss and center of gravity are compensated for. All of this is handled automatically by the control system.

The MiG-31K's performance characteristics remain unchanged from the MiG-31BM, with the exception of its armament. When using the Kh-47M2, the attachment of other missiles becomes impossible, so the MiG-31K's entire armament consists of the GSh-23-6 cannon and the Kh-47M2 missile.

Overall, the MiG-31 hasn't changed all that much over the past 50 years. Yes, it has more powerful and fuel-efficient engines, more modern electronics, and longer-range missiles. This is the path all aircraft in the world follow, destined for a longer life than others.

Aviation publications around the world focused on other aircraft, with the F-15, F-16, F-22, Su-27, Su-35, and MiG-29 always at the forefront. The MiG-31 always seemed to play a backseat, a clumsy symbol of the Soviet era.

But who said a weapon must be beautiful and elegant? Oh yes, the beauty of a ceremonial sword with a silver- or gilded blade and jewels on the hilt is a beautiful weapon. Just like the modern gilded pistols of various princes and barons. But beauty is completely incompatible with effectiveness. This has been proven by conventional weapons.

The MiG-31 is a very common and quite effective weapon, used when necessary.


It would be very strange to see such an aircraft in service with any European country, whose territory the MiG-31 can cross in a leisurely half-hour flight. But in the vast expanses of the Russian North, where the 31st mostly served, or over the Pacific Ocean, from Kamchatka to Vladivostok, the MiG-31 looked quite normal and capable.

There are universal aircraft. There are highly specialized ones. And then there are simply good aircraft with great potential. The MiG-31 is one of them. A flying command post, an interceptor, a ground-attack missile carrier, a satellite killer—basically, anything your imagination can imagine, the MiG-31 can do.

The 1970s were a true renaissance of military engineering. In so many countries around the world, weapons that are still relevant today were created with such ease that it's simply astonishing. "Falcons," "Hawks," "Mirages," TanksTheir Abrams and Leopards, our T-72s—all from that era. And our Su-27s and MiG-31s, too.

So, half a century is certainly a long time, but not for a good weapon. That's why the MiG-31's transition from an interceptor/defender to a missile-carrying attacker happened so smoothly. Smoothly, of course, for us.

Of course, one shouldn't dwell on the MiG-31K; it's more of a testing ground for the Kinzhal, a missile that's easier to handle for more specialized aircraft like the Tu-160M ​​or Tu-22M3M. And it must be said that combat testing has demonstrated the Kinzhal's suitability, and therefore the MiG-31 has also proven itself as a strike aircraft. However, first and foremost, the MiG-31 is the guardian of our country's airspace, and it is in this role that it is most valuable, as there is currently no aircraft in the world capable of even adequately escaping this interceptor.


Half a century ago, the teams of the Mikoyan Design Bureau and the Perm Engine Design Bureau, under the leadership of General Designer R. A. Belyakov, G. E. Lozino-Lozinsky, K. K. Vasilchenko, V. A. Arkhipov, A. A. Belosvet, E. K. Kostrubsky, and Chief Engine Designer P. A. Solovyov, created a true masterpiece. An aircraft that never ages, never loses its strength and capabilities, a true guardian of boundaries and peace.

Happy anniversary, MiG-31!
102 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 14+
    20 September 2025 05: 52
    In 1994, the last MiG-31s ​​were assembled based on airframes built during the Soviet era.

    In Nizhny Novgorod, a Rosrezerv official sold four MiG-31 aircraft for 153 rubles. A former employee of the Volga Federal District's department has been charged with embezzling nearly 500 million rubles from the budget.
    A criminal case under Part 4 of Article 159 of the Criminal Code was opened in August 2009 by the Investigative Department for Investigating Particularly Important Cases of the Investigative Committee of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation for the Nizhny Novgorod Region.

    And we heard "galoshes, galoshes..." But selling several tons of titanium and stainless steel for the price of a pair of galoshes - that's business...
    1. 10+
      20 September 2025 06: 09
      Quote: Amateur
      And we heard "galoshes, galoshes..."

      An airplane that never ages and never loses its strength and capabilities, a true guardian of borders and peace.
      good drinks
      1. +9
        20 September 2025 06: 53
        Quote from Uncle Lee
        An airplane that never ages and never loses its strength and capabilities, a true guardian of borders and peace.

        An old horse won't spoil a furrow!! Long life and clear skies to the veteran!!
        1. 0
          20 September 2025 11: 34
          I really want to see the cockpit of the MiG-31BM2.
          The cockpit of the MiG-31BM is not impressive.
          There are very few of these planes left, but there were more than 500.
          https://vk.com/@cosmomuseum43-mig-31-na-strazhe-vozdushnyh-granic
          1. +6
            20 September 2025 11: 49
            Quote: Okko777
            I really want to see the cockpit of the MiG-31BM2.

            The cockpit of the MiG-31BM (there is no information about the BM2)
            1. -1
              20 September 2025 11: 52
              I personally haven't sat in the cockpit of this plane, but I provided a link... Well, this option is accepted... Provide a link to the source.
            2. -6
              20 September 2025 12: 06
              The article is weak and it's better to watch 2 videos while relaxing:
              https://yandex.ru/video/preview/1822379358254819294
              https://yandex.ru/video/preview/18146612859867651258
    2. -9
      20 September 2025 06: 54
      Quote: Amateur
      And we heard "galoshes, galoshes..."


      About the crisis. Yes, the crisis was deep, and we "fell" more than many countries, absolutely sure. What is it because of? Due to the fact that we have a one-sided economy. And what did she do yesterday? Yes, it has developed like this for 70 years. Because everything we made ...
      Yes, my dears, yes. No need to debate. The fact is that what we produced, and no need to wave your hands, was not needed by anyone, because no one bought our galoshes, except for the Africans, who had to walk on the hot sand. That's the whole point.
      We had a defense industry - cool, strong, and we are still proud of it. We are grateful to our grandfathers and our fathers for creating such a defense industry after the Great Patriotic War.
      Voice from the audience:
      - And the first satellite.
      V. V. Putin:
      - Both the first satellite and the first man in space are our common pride, these are the achievements of the Soviet regime, of which we are all proud. These are nationwide achievements.
      But consumer goods... Zhirinovsky has already said this. Where were they? There were none. Let's not lie to each other and the people. The people know what was and what was not.
      1. +3
        20 September 2025 07: 18
        We're talking about the worthy legendary plane... And you, back to the "fan"...
        1. -3
          20 September 2025 12: 48
          Quote: ved_med12
          And you, back to the "fan"...

          Me? "Dilettante" started the conversation about "galoshes."
      2. 16+
        20 September 2025 07: 34
        Quote: Dart2027
        But consumer goods... Zhirinovsky already said this. Where were they? They weren't there.Let's not lie to each other or to the people. The people know what happened and what didn't.

        How could there not have been? What did we have back then? I had a refrigerator, a TV, a bicycle, a car (my parents had one), a vacuum cleaner, spoons and forks, all my clothes and shoes, a computer (a Spectrum)... All of this was manufactured in our own country! And what is there that is manufactured in our own country now? Nothing. At least for me.

        What's truly missing now are any domestic consumer goods. In the USSR, that's all there was. Although, there was that guy in Germany back then. He probably had everything imported. Except for galoshes. But in any case, his phrase is more applicable to the period of his own rule. And not when he had free education, free housing, free healthcare, and free sports. And people retired on time back then. They had time to live!
        1. -11
          20 September 2025 12: 52
          Quote: Amateur
          The people who lived in the USSR have not yet completely died out.

          So tell your tales of universal abundance to someone else. No one was naked, barefoot, or hungry, but everything else was in short supply. Just like the tales about everyone getting free apartments.
          1. +7
            20 September 2025 14: 57
            They did, and it wasn't just fairy tales...
            1. -3
              20 September 2025 15: 28
              Quote: dnestr74
              They did, and it wasn't just fairy tales.


              Quote: Dart2027
              Just like the fairy tales about all They gave out free apartments.
              1. +1
                20 September 2025 16: 47
                Everyone got it sooner or later, well, if you were single and not married, you could get a room of course, because no problem, families always got it.
                1. -2
                  20 September 2025 17: 34
                  Quote: dnestr74
                  Everyone got it sooner or later

                  At my own expense.
                2. -1
                  22 September 2025 18: 31
                  Okay, enough talk, we waited in line for years. We lived in one-room apartments.
                  1. +1
                    22 September 2025 18: 37
                    Yes...We waited a long time, I agree...But we received it.
                    1. -2
                      22 September 2025 18: 39
                      After many, many years. Having suffered in small-family apartments.
              2. +3
                21 September 2025 07: 50
                Quote: Dart2027
                fairy tales about how everyone was given free apartments.

                Everyone, and more than once. Our family only received free apartments three times! During my life in the USSR. The old, smaller apartment was, of course, given back to the state.
                1. -3
                  21 September 2025 09: 18
                  Quote: Stas157
                  To everyone and more than once.

                  Whose fantasy is this?
                  Quote: Stas157
                  The old, smaller apartment was, of course, given back to the state.

                  In other words, the apartment was actually rented out, and talk of "free apartment distribution" is a primitive lie based on a substitution of concepts - in the understanding of a citizen of the Russian Federation, your apartment is your apartment and no one can take it away.
                  1. +4
                    21 September 2025 09: 50
                    Quote: Dart2027
                    That is, the apartment was actually rented out.

                    What rent? They pay big bucks for rent and lease. Apartments were given away for free! And utilities were mere pennies. Unlike your "blessed" times!
                    The old apartment, of course, was given to the state. We couldn't live in two apartments at once! Why do we need it when they give us apartments for free?
                    1. 0
                      21 September 2025 10: 16
                      Quote: Stas157
                      What kind of rent? They pay big money for rent and lease.

                      You're supposed to be an engineer. But you say such, um, nonsense.

                      Renting is when you use something that doesn't belong to you and pay for it. Whether you pay a lot or a little is just a matter of detail.
                    2. 0
                      21 September 2025 10: 24
                      Quote: Stas157
                      What kind of rent? Renting and renting costs a lot of money.

                      So they paid - it's called added value.
                      Quote: Stas157
                      The old apartment, of course, was given to the state. We couldn't live in two apartments at once!

                      Once again, no one just takes away private property, even if it’s a hundred apartments, which means it was state-owned, which means
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      Talk of "free distribution of apartments" is a primitive lie based on a substitution of concepts

                      Well, and the fact that they didn’t give it to everyone.
                      1. +2
                        21 September 2025 12: 28
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        Once again, no one takes away private property so easily.

                        What difference does it make whether you own an apartment or not, if you've lived in it your whole life and no one has taken it away from you? You could even inherit an apartment by registering a relative in it. That's what everyone did.

                        Quote: Dart2027
                        Well, and the fact that they didn’t give it to everyone.

                        You won't believe it. But no one lived on the streets or on heating mains back then! What does that mean? At least they provided a dormitory for the first few days. And that's incredibly valuable for someone in a difficult situation! Incidentally, no one found themselves in that situation back then either.
                      2. -1
                        21 September 2025 12: 48
                        Quote: Stas157
                        What difference does it make whether you own an apartment or not?

                        That is, you can no longer argue with the fact that the apartments were not entirely their own.
                        Quote: Stas157
                        The apartment could even be left as an inheritance

                        Die at work and get full ownership of it?
                        Quote: Stas157
                        You won't believe it. But no one lived on the streets or on the heating mains back then!

                        The term "homeless person" appeared then (this is in relation to difficult situations).
                      3. 0
                        21 September 2025 13: 38
                        Quote: Stas157
                        But no one lived on the street or on the heating main back then.

                        Hmm. 1985, winter. A friend of mine, an engineer, fresh out of Tula Polytechnic, lived in a basement for six months. He'd come to work in the mornings wearing a suit and tie. How he did it, no one knew.

                        At the same time, I was living in Moscow in a university dorm, commuting to work every day, a two-and-a-half-hour commute each way. The reason was that we were hired for a dorm that hadn't been built yet. We ended up finishing it later.

                        Quote: Stas157
                        apartments are given away for free

                        Yep. They're catching up, and then they give me more. My wife and I lived in the same university dorm for two years, until she defended her dissertation (I was already working, in the Moscow region). After she defended it and we had a baby, we rented for three years. Then the company director really needed me, and they let me borrow an apartment. In that same dorm. But, as you can imagine, this isn't the most typical case; if it weren't for the miracles I performed there at work, I'd be a vegetable, not an apartment.

                        Like this request
                      4. +1
                        21 September 2025 15: 49
                        Quote: Paranoid62
                        Just came from Tula Polytechnic, lived in a basement for six months.

                        And this clearly wasn't in Tula. Or any other Russian city, except Moscow. Moscow has always been special. A center of gravity. Many gravitated there by hook or by crook. And I wouldn't be surprised if some even lived in a basement. If only they could get to Moscow!

                        Quote: Paranoid62
                        They catch up and give more.

                        During Soviet times, Moscow and the Moscow region were the most problematic places to find apartments. The situation there was not the general rule for the rest of the country.
                      5. 0
                        21 September 2025 15: 55
                        Quote: Stas157
                        ...I wouldn't be surprised if some of them even lived in a basement. If only they could get to Moscow.

                        Well, not Moscow - the Moscow region... and there was this thing called "assignment" back then, you probably don't remember. You went where you were told. And then all this crap happened. request

                        Quote: Stas157
                        was not a general rule for the rest of the country

                        Stas, how would you know that? You're from Moscow, and your parents are clearly well off. What do you care about the country's problems at that point? Nothing.

                        And on the Internet nowadays you can dig up anything, so why should I teach you? laughing
                      6. -1
                        21 September 2025 17: 39
                        Quote: Paranoid62
                        Stas, how would you know this?

                        I didn't live to see my job placement. I graduated from university in 93. And then, you could go wherever you wanted. But my father told me that top students could choose where to go (in the 60s). And the key question when choosing was: when would they get an apartment? Some demanded one from the company representatives right away.
                  2. 0
                    22 September 2025 18: 38
                    They'll definitely take you away for debts and move you to a room in a homeless shelter.
                    1. +1
                      22 September 2025 19: 32
                      Quote: dnestr74
                      They'll definitely take it away for debts.

                      FOR debts and simply being taken away are two different things.
                2. 0
                  22 September 2025 18: 32
                  Your family was apparently a criminal one.
                  1. 0
                    22 September 2025 19: 33
                    Quote: Calm_type
                    the family was apparently a criminal one

                    There are two categories of those who talk about the abundance of that time: the first, those who personally experienced it, the second, those who listened to the first.
          2. +5
            20 September 2025 19: 38
            Quote: Dart2027
            Just like the fairy tales about everyone being given free apartments.
            Our family was given a "free" apartment because my grandfather, a WWII veteran, defended this State when the Enemy attacked it.
            Mother and Father (and 2 grandfathers and 2 grandmothers) worked at state enterprises (and a collective farm) - they worked off the money spent by the State on the construction of a house with "free" apartments.
            1. -2
              20 September 2025 20: 37
              Quote: cat Rusich
              Our family was given a "free" apartment

              And a bunch of others didn't. Some were given it, but much more often
              Quote: cat Rusich
              They worked off the money spent by the State on the construction of a building with "free" apartments

              That is, yes, they gave an apartment, but it was “free”.
              And many didn't even get that.
      3. 14+
        20 September 2025 07: 35
        But consumer goods... Zhirinovsky has already said this. Where were they? There were none. Let's not lie to each other and the people. The people know what was and what was not.

        The people who lived in the USSR haven't completely died out yet. So they know what was and wasn't. And there's no need to lie to the people. No one was naked, barefoot, or hungry. They lived in apartments provided free of charge by the state. And that's not counting free education and healthcare.
        1. 11+
          20 September 2025 08: 29
          Education was the best, medicine was the best and everything was free, now it costs money and it’s so-so!
          1. +5
            20 September 2025 16: 48
            Education—yes, the best in the world, I think...medicine, well, that's debatable. The advantage is that it's free, but the quality isn't for everyone.
            1. +2
              21 September 2025 15: 22
              Quote: dnestr74
              Education—yes, the best in the world, I think...medicine, well, that's debatable. The advantage is that it's free, but the quality isn't for everyone.

              Medicine was decent back then. Doctors treated people to keep them healthy, not like now, to generate a steady income from the patient (and if they recover, it's a nice bonus for the patient and a drawback to the doctor's professionalism). My cousin, who was 11 when she was born in the village, got leukemia. She was treated in Kazan, free of charge. Now she's almost 50 and babysitting her grandchildren, and she's healthy. A classmate had a heart defect; she had surgery in Novosibirsk, and mind you, it wasn't a crowdfunding campaign, like "let's raise money for a unique drug." Both the surgery and the rehabilitation were free.
              1. +2
                21 September 2025 15: 24
                The dentistry was really scary)))
                1. 0
                  21 September 2025 15: 39
                  Quote: dnestr74
                  The dentistry was really scary)))

                  Well, not everyone was lucky with dentists. At our aviation town, there was one dentist for everyone; he treated both children and adults, and he knew how to extract, but not how to heal. Since then, even the smell of the office makes me faint. But at college, we had a dentist, a girl, the daughter of one of the teachers, and she did excellent work; the filling in my tooth has been in place for over 30 years now, so it's fine. That's how it is.
        2. -14
          20 September 2025 12: 51
          Quote: Amateur
          The people who lived in the USSR have not yet completely died out.

          So tell your tales of universal abundance to someone else. No one was naked, barefoot, or hungry, but everything else was in short supply. Just like the tales about everyone getting free apartments.
          1. +8
            20 September 2025 12: 55
            But everything else was in great shortage. Just like the fairy tales about everyone getting free apartments.

            I'm 74 years old. And I lived through it. And I'm not going to prove anything to anyone. Because whoever wants to, knows. And whoever doesn't want to know, you can't prove anything to them anyway.
            1. -3
              20 September 2025 14: 15
              Quote: Amateur
              And I lived at that time.

              I also lived through the USSR, so I know.
              1. 0
                29 December 2025 15: 55
                What does "caught in" mean? What year exactly? You'll agree there's a difference between "caught in" and "living in."
                1. 0
                  29 December 2025 16: 20
                  At the time of the collapse, he was studying in high school.
      4. +9
        20 September 2025 09: 10
        "But consumer goods... Where were they? There weren't any." Exactly! In the USSR, everyone walked around naked, but in galoshes. There were no refrigerators or televisions in the dugouts. They ate whatever they found in the forests.
        1. -12
          20 September 2025 12: 51
          Quote: Amateur
          The people who lived in the USSR have not yet completely died out.

          So tell your tales of universal abundance to someone else. No one was naked, barefoot, or hungry, but everything else was in short supply. Just like the tales about everyone getting free apartments.
      5. +7
        20 September 2025 13: 18
        Quote: Dart2027
        About the crisis. Yes, the crisis was deep, and we "fell" more than many countries, absolutely sure. What is it because of? Due to the fact that we have a one-sided economy. And what did she do yesterday? Yes, it has developed like this for 70 years. Because everything we made ...


        And what did we produce? Over 70 years, we built more housing than in previous eras. We established powerful basic industries, an energy sector, built numerous roads, and various infrastructure. How many people in pre-revolutionary Russia had access to electricity, running water, and sewerage? However, the percentage has grown significantly. And this despite such a devastating war.

        By the way, was the Tsarist Russian economy "multifaceted"? Back when Russia was called an army and a country. But what could we do? We simply couldn't have survived without it, with so many resources, the longest border in the world, and such restless and resource-hungry neighbors.

        Was there a shortage of consumer goods? Where, really, is there a shortage? In Western countries? And what are the prices there? If Western goods had been sold in the USSR at Western prices, then yes, our shelves would have been full too. Simply because few could afford them. That's exactly what happened in the post-Soviet era. The shelves were stocked, but the shortage of goods gave way to a cash shortage among the population, which was artificially created. First, savings were devalued by hyperinflation, then wages were delayed for months.

        Well, yes, it doesn't matter to some, there are still plenty of consumer goods on the shelves. But if you remove imported goods, screwdriver-assembled products, and counterfeit goods (like glass beads) bought with energy, will there still be much left on the shelves? Only recently (thanks to the SVO) have some, though still sluggish, progress begun.

        We shouldn't spit in the well of the Soviet past; we'll have to drink from that well more than once.
        1. -6
          20 September 2025 14: 18
          Quote: Illanatol
          And what did we produce? For 70 years

          Comparing the technological level of the Stone Age and the 20th century? Hmm.
          Quote: Illanatol
          That's essentially what happened in the post-Soviet era. Everything was on the shelves, but the shortage of goods gave way to an artificially created shortage of cash among the population. First, savings were devalued by hyperinflation, then wages were delayed for months.

          Now too?
          Quote: Illanatol
          Don't spit in the well of the Soviet past

          When you start spitting, don't be offended if you receive the same spitting in return.
          1. +2
            21 September 2025 09: 28
            1. Who is to blame for Tsarist Russia falling so far behind? Most of the country has changed little since the time of Tsar Gorokh.
            2. Not to the same extent, but it still exists. Solvent demand is artificially limited, and the latest paroxysm of the "war on poverty" is quickly and painstakingly forgotten after the next election. And yes, migrants have been brought into the country en masse to increase competition in the labor market and prevent local workers from living excessively well.
            3. The difference is that the pre-Soviet past, like today's crunchy bakers, is no longer useful and never will be, while the Soviet experience is still in demand, and even today we exist thanks to the Soviet legacy in everything, including in the defense sector.
            1. -4
              21 September 2025 10: 21
              Quote: Illanatol
              Who is to blame for the fact that Tsarist Russia fell so far behind?

              So how many Stone Age buildings were built in Europe?
              Quote: Illanatol
              Not to such an extent, but yes, it still exists.

              So who has their wages delayed for months?
              Quote: Illanatol
              as well as today's bakers

              Well, personally, I really liked this bun as a child.
              Witnesses of the USSR contemptuously call their opponents “bulk crunches”, referring to a line from the song by Alexander Dobronravov based on the poems by Victor Pelenyagre “How delightful are the evenings in Russia...” (1996):

              And Schubert's waltzes, and the crunch of French bread.
              Love, champagne, sunsets, alleys -
              How delightful evening in Russia.

              While neo-Stalinists have no complaints about sunsets and alleys, the French bread has become a symbol of something elitist and obscene for them.
              In fact, a French loaf of bread in Tsarist Russia cost three kopecks.
              "I'll take this loaf of bread with me if you give it to me," said Alyosha, taking the three-kopeck French loaf and putting it in his cassock pocket. F. M. Dostoevsky, "The Brothers Karamazov," 1880
              Any peasant who came to the city could buy a French loaf.
              In Stalin's USSR, French bread wasn't considered the food of the exploitative classes either. French bread was officially baked in bakeries.
              The Bolsheviks even organized socialist competitions in baking French bread.
              https://dzen.ru/a/ZAHItU59DGd-8Hix


              Quote: Illanatol
              and even now we exist thanks to the Soviet legacy in everything.

              Yes, yes, yes, they came to the desert and did everything from scratch.
              1. +1
                22 September 2025 09: 51
                What does Stone Age Europe have to do with this? The Bolsheviks didn't seize power in the Neolithic.
                Salaries aren't being delayed, but the real purchasing power of wages has begun to decline. Rising prices, coupled with inflation, have begun to outpace the growth (and indexation) of wages and pensions. Are you going to deny the obvious? Perhaps you could provide precise data on the growth in consumer goods production, the revival of trade, and other positive developments?

                Maybe we can also discuss Schubert's waltzes, which one do you like the most?
                French rolls (they vary; a croissant is also a roll) are usually famous for their softness. The crunch is usually due to the breadcrumbs. laughing

                Well, after the Civil War, it was practically a desert, and we had to start from scratch. Including in the defense sector. How many enterprises in Tsarist Russia produced a) aircraft? b) armored vehicles? c) missiles?
                What's been in our Armed Forces since pre-revolutionary times? Mosin rifles were seemingly removed from service long ago.

                P.S. I currently live in the Leninsky District of Irkutsk. Before the Revolution, it was just the Innokentyevskaya railway station and its log houses. After the construction of the local aircraft factory, a whole neighborhood sprang up.
                Two-thirds of cities were founded or granted city status during Soviet times (for the Russian Federation as a whole). Before 1917, their level of urbanization was somewhere between Turkey and Ethiopia.
                1. -1
                  22 September 2025 19: 31
                  Quote: Illanatol
                  What does Stone Age Europe have to do with this?


                  Quote: Illanatol
                  In 70 years, more housing was built than in previous eras.

                  An era isn't a decade. All over the world, more was built in the 20th century than in the millennia before—that's called technological progress.
                  Quote: Illanatol
                  Maybe we can also discuss Schubert's waltzes, which one do you like the most?

                  That is, they became enlightened.
                  Quote: Illanatol
                  Well, how many enterprises in Tsarist Russia produced a) aircraft? b) armored vehicles? c) rocket technology?

                  Airplanes were produced, armored vehicles in the modern sense appeared after the Russian Empire had essentially ceased to exist, and missiles were not used at all at that time.
                  Quote: Illanatol
                  What's been in our Armed Forces since pre-revolutionary times? Mosin rifles were seemingly removed from service long ago.

                  Aren't these the same ones that were in service until the end of WWII? Snipers carried them until 63.
      6. 0
        21 October 2025 18: 07
        Now, don't go on about 70 years, this liberalism. Where are the economic growth figures under Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, and that traitor Gorbachev? And their direct role in the USSR's economy.
        1. 0
          21 October 2025 19: 23
          Quote: Sergio Dedovets
          Where are the economic growth figures under Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, and that traitor Gorbachev? And their direct role in the USSR economy?

          Could you make it more clear?
          1. +1
            22 October 2025 08: 33
            There's no need to throw out "facts" from the Gorbachev era of anti-Soviet propaganda without supporting evidence. If we take the economic growth figures under Stalin and Khrushchev, we'll see clearly different figures. And we know the blow Khrushchev dealt to the USSR's economy, how he destroyed everything that existed under Stalin. Now tell me that the USSR collapsed because the system rotted, and not because it was "rotted" by traitors Gorbachev, Yakovlev, and Co.
            1. -1
              22 October 2025 19: 17
              Quote: Sergio Dedovets
              You might as well say that the USSR collapsed because the system rotted, and not because the traitors Gorbachev, Yakovlev and Co. "rotted" it.

              Did these traitors fall from the Moon? Or from Mars? The USSR collapsed precisely because the system was fundamentally unviable, and everything else is a consequence.
              1. +1
                25 October 2025 21: 42
                What do the moon and Mars have to do with this, a liberal kindergarten? Under Stalin, everything worked and developed at a rapid pace, but with Khrushchev, things started to slide and then came crashing down. Stalin's plans included removing the party apparatus from governing the country. That is, Stalin thought big and focused on the country's development, and in international politics, he was building a strong foundation for the USSR, while Khrushchev ruined everything, ruining relations within the socialist camp, including with China. If you, as the head of your family, commit acts of insanity and your family falls apart because of it, is it your family that is unviable, or did your actions lead it to this? Read up on Gorby, see how much insanity he committed, and what he did intentionally.
                1. -1
                  25 October 2025 23: 09
                  Quote: Sergio Dedovets
                  What does the moon and Mars have to do with this, a liberal kindergarten? Under Stalin, everything worked and developed at a rapid pace, but with Khrushchev, things started to slide and eventually came to a screeching halt.

                  That is, the entire USSR was held together by Stalin alone, and as soon as he was gone (killed), the USSR began to fall apart.
                  Quote: Sergio Dedovets
                  If you are the head of your family

                  How wretched was the USSR if it could be destroyed like an ordinary family.
                  1. +1
                    26 October 2025 21: 13
                    I'm absolutely certain you have Antonovsky's mustache and Golovanov's beard, and a portrait of Solzhenitsyn hangs above your bed. You've been parroting lies from Gorbachev-era CIA manuals for 40 years now, making fools of yourselves, and most importantly, showing no shame for your ignorance and clowning. Explaining anything to people like you is pointless; the Vlasovites, like the Banderites, cannot be remade.
                    1. -1
                      26 October 2025 22: 11
                      Quote: Sergio Dedovets
                      I'm just sure that you have

                      Is there anything substantive to say? You yourself mentioned that without Stalin, everything went where it did. It's all about people—we're simply a biological species, and there's nothing we can do about it.
                      Dreaming of a new communist revolution? Well, if it happens anywhere—I hope not here—after victory, half the revolutionaries at the very top will be sacked within a week. That's life.
  2. 14+
    20 September 2025 06: 09
    It's with a certain sense of pride that I note in my biography that, as a young worker at the time, I played a small but direct role in the assembly of pre-production and the first production D30F6 engine. It was a fun time, despite the hectic work schedule. At the same time, we were building a display engine that was shown to L.I. Brezhnev, dismantling a couple of them after pilot Fedotov belly-landed the plane in a field (Fedotov never abandoned his planes), and training crews from the production shop.
    My father made a great contribution to the installation of an engine on a wing, for which he was awarded an order.
    1. +4
      20 September 2025 08: 34
      Quote: U-58
      With a certain sense of pride, I note in my biography that, being a young worker at that time...
      beautiful.
      I'm interested in two questions.
      1) How many of them are left today (in service)?
      2) And what is stopping them from mass-producing new ones now?
      what
      1. +2
        20 September 2025 13: 19
        It's impossible to know how many of them are left. But Wikipedia does have some information.
        Resuming production can hardly be considered feasible, since obsolescence is evident, technological equipment has been lost, and materials - steel and titanium - are no longer relevant.
        It would be better to make (if we do it, not just talk about it) a new airplane like the mythical MiG-41.
        1. +1
          20 September 2025 13: 50
          Quote: U-58
          It would be better to make (if we do it, not just talk about it) a new airplane like the mythical MiG-41.
          Why? The Su-57 can now perform interceptor missions; it has everything it needs (a powerful radar, long-range missiles, and supersonic cruising speed for rapid deployment to the launch site).
        2. +2
          21 September 2025 04: 25
          Quote: U-58
          materials- steel and titanium are not relevant .
          It turns out that this is how beautifully one can formulate the loss of competence and degradation in the culture of high-tech aircraft production!! good
          It’s just hard to believe that modern (composite etc.) materials will be able to provide the same margin of safety and wear resistance for new interceptor aircraft of this class (capable of rising over 25-30 km !!), so that new aircraft would achieve the same characteristics and at the same time serve for 50+ years... ?!! what
          hi
          1. -1
            21 September 2025 07: 42
            At one point, the Japanese began producing F-15 components under license. But they couldn't get the composites to bond properly. The strength was nonexistent. They complained to the developer. The answer was: strictly adhere to the technology, and everything would be as it should be. They conducted numerous process audits, and in the end, they succeeded.
  3. 0
    20 September 2025 06: 40
    And I already thought that they were going to bury him too wink
    1. +6
      20 September 2025 07: 45
      And I already thought that they were going to bury him too

      But there's nothing to replace it with. A new plane isn't like assembling drones from Chinese components.
  4. KCA
    +1
    20 September 2025 07: 06
    There are developments like "devil", a hundred years or more will pass, but for the enemy it will be a devil, neither beat nor escape
  5. -1
    20 September 2025 07: 32
    Ooooh, the "minus ser" rushed by, hit everyone, one after another... laughing
  6. +3
    20 September 2025 07: 33
    The Su-7B is a mediocre and unsuccessful fighter, to put it mildly.

    Well, yeah... In my time, this is what they said about this plane:
    The plane is a trumpet, and the pilot is a trumpet!
    Well, to the birthday boy, clear skies and another 50 years of life! A full one! good
    1. +1
      20 September 2025 08: 40
      The Su-7B is a mediocre and unsuccessful fighter, to put it mildly.
      Well, yeah... In my time, this is what they said about this plane:
      The plane is a trumpet, and the pilot is a trumpet!

      There never was an Su-7B fighter. There was the Su-7, and the Su-7B is a fighter-bomber, which is not the same thing at all.
      Meanwhile, the Su-7, the latest frontline fighter designed by the Sukhoi Design Bureau, was at hand. With some modifications, it could easily fill a niche in strike aviation. While boasting impressive performance and a powerful engine, it was less well-suited to the frontline fighter concept than the light Mikoyan aircraft, appearing unusually large and heavy. However, this in no way prevented it from being adapted to new requirements. The Su-7B fighter-bomber would be practically equal to the Yak-28 in maximum combat load, boasting high ground speed and unmatched altitude for the Yak, and its range was then estimated at 2000 km.
      (https://airwar.ru/enc/fighter/su7b.html)
    2. -2
      20 September 2025 11: 44
      Not so: the designer is dry; the plane is damp, the technician is wet, and the pilot is dead... That's the most literary version... Although this applies more to the MiGs, they weren't even close to the Su in terms of ease of maintenance...
      1. +3
        20 September 2025 23: 40
        technician - wet

        As an engineer who operates both the Sukhoi and the MiG, I completely agree. This applies more to the MiG.
        How many hatches do the technicians have to open to access the equipment? On the Su-27, it's the "dog kennel." In the nose gear niche. And there it all is, lined up in rows. And neither rain, nor wind, nor even frost bother you, because it's relatively warm there.
        And on the MiG, everything is scattered all over the plane, including a lot of it on top. They used to cover it with a cover to open the hatch and check or replace something.
        This probably doesn't apply to radio-electronic equipment specialists; the MiG has a FAR and there are no "meat grinders"
        1. -2
          20 September 2025 23: 48
          Senior engineer for aircraft engineering. Worked on the Su-17M2, Su-17M3, Su-17M4, Su-20, Su-22; Su-24, Su-25, Su-27. Familiar with the MiG-23, MiG-27... Still the best... 65 years old. They'll take me anywhere if I want... I know how it was in the USSR, I know how it's done. All the instructions and guidelines. Three times operational experience, repair instructor...
          1. 0
            20 September 2025 23: 52
            No, I'm younger. I joined the regiment (Monchegorsk) in 1994.
            RSNO.
            1. -2
              21 September 2025 00: 03
              I was a delegate to the 1st All-Army Officers' Meeting in Moscow in 1989, when the Soviet Army's collapse began to unfold due to the generals' disconnect from the Armed Forces officers and their current missions. The memory of that meeting has been erased, its decisions forgotten and falsified. We urgently need to reintroduce officers' meetings to the army and purge it of its filth...
              1. -2
                21 September 2025 00: 12
                He was a delegate to the congress of representatives of officers' assemblies of units stationed in Ukraine in 1991 in Vinnytsia. The assembly decided to maintain central subordination and not submit to the Ukrainian authorities. The Black Sea Fleet also supported this decision. The generals betrayed the officer movement, and so did the colonels. Since then, the word "general" has been associated with the word "shit," with rare exceptions, and to this day! The USSR collapsed because the Soviet Army collapsed...
              2. 0
                21 September 2025 00: 19
                Perhaps you are right.
                But I can hardly imagine the free expression of opinions and positions in the Army. Where unity of command is the foundation of everything, and it can't be any other way. Where the Presidium is filled with generals and colonels, and in the gallery are the rank-and-file lieutenants under the watchful eye of a major, the deputy for educational work...
                Maybe I'm wrong, but that's how we were taught, and I didn't see anything else during my service.
                1. -2
                  21 September 2025 00: 25
                  The officers' meeting only strengthens unity of command. The commander chairs the meeting and runs it, while the secretary is elected by the officers. The commander relies on the meeting, and the meeting supports him if he is the commander. At the meeting, and only at the meeting, can every officer express their opinion, regardless of rank. And decisions are made by a general vote. And the bullshit doesn't surface, isn't sent to training, isn't promoted by connections... And the commander can't be punished from above if the officers' meeting supports him.
                  1. 0
                    21 September 2025 00: 35
                    Quote: Okko777
                    the top moves along the lines of connections

                    How many newspaper articles have we seen about "pilot dynasties"?
                    These are such great guys!! Stakhanovites.
                    Dad is a general, the son of a squadron commander at 27 years old... And his classmates are either captains or taxi drivers already.
                    Passed, we know.
                    1. osp
                      0
                      21 September 2025 14: 23
                      And the Monchegorsk 174th Regiment was subject to reduction in 2001, as was the neighboring regiment with Su-27s in Afrikanda, which was withdrawn there from Rogachevo?
                      A funny story happened with the Su-27 aircraft of the last regiment (more than half of them were single-seaters).
                      They were then sent to the 20th Aircraft Repair Plant near St. Petersburg for repairs, because they had been used little, had never been repaired, and for various reasons were laid up.
                      And what is the result?
                      They remained at this ARZ until 2015-2016 until they were scrapped!!!
                      Having been in operation for less than 10 years, they were produced between 1987 and 1989.
                      And they waited 15 years for repairs...
  7. +8
    20 September 2025 07: 46
    Who said that the MIG-31 is "not beautiful"?
    Wonderful, beautiful plane! good
  8. +5
    20 September 2025 08: 10
    The only thing I disagree with is that it's not pretty. It's a very beautiful plane. It's incredibly loud—that's for sure.
    Happy anniversary, MIGAR!!!
  9. +5
    20 September 2025 08: 42
    Overall, the MiG-31 hasn't changed all that much over the past 50 years.
    I wouldn't say this plane has changed much. It's essentially a new plane in the same old frame.
    MiG-31BM
    1) New electronic equipment with open architecture
    2) modernized forward and rearward looking radar
    3) EW
    4) a guidance complex and an optical location system have been installed that allows you to secretly find the enemy by the heat of running engines
    5) new D-30f6 engines with a digital automated control system and a plasma ignition system, which allows oxygen-free engine starting at any altitude.
    6) There is no oxygen system on board (in the context of the engine)
    7) replacement of the wing mechanization with fly-by-wire, similar to the 5th generation Su-57 aircraft. What did reducing the weight of the car and improving the performance characteristics of the aircraft bring?
    8) It becomes possible to use the modernized R-37M air-to-air missile with a target engagement range of up to 400 km
    9) The R-74M missile with a maximum range of up to 40 km. The missile has all-aspect capabilities in terms of the launch angle of attack range, which allows the aircraft to launch a missile at an enemy located even in the rear hemisphere without changing course. "Fire and forget."
  10. +2
    20 September 2025 12: 49
    Good day! It's nice to read an article that doesn't read like "everything is already outdated and unnecessary." There are plenty of examples of "not needed or outdated"—airborne forces, marines, tanks, helicopters, and the like. You can find relevant articles on the website. But I'll just say something about drones—a short-term solution. They'll find solutions. Here and now, they're simply necessary. But they'll invent systems that ground them (jam them). And then what? Drones aren't a panacea or a new way of waging war. All of this is temporary.
  11. +5
    20 September 2025 12: 57
    Awkward? To me, he's a handsome man, a real man among the intelligentsia.
  12. +6
    20 September 2025 14: 32
    The author is not quite aware of the performance characteristics of the MiG-31K.
    The aircraft's maximum altitude is 21500 meters, and its speed is 2850 km/h. But! These figures are for a plane without a payload. When the MiG-31K is towing such a missile, it won't achieve 21500 meters and 2850 km/h. Of course, all this is top secret, but physics and mathematics provide a clue. With such a missile, you can climb to a maximum altitude of 17-18 kilometers and reach a launch speed of Mach 2. That's quite sufficient. So, there are no 25000 meters and 3000 km/h. Or rather, it does. Without a payload and with minimal fuel. But real life is different.
  13. +3
    20 September 2025 16: 44
    Quote: Stas157
    Although the guy was in Germany at the time. Everything he probably had was imported.

    Even now, everything he buys is imported from partners in unfriendly countries. The aesthete's delicate soul cannot tolerate anything domestic.
  14. +3
    20 September 2025 18: 41
    Handsome! Power, speed.
  15. -2
    20 September 2025 23: 28
    What kind of beast is this "RK-RLDN"?
    Where did they find the "targeting and navigation system" on the MiG-31?
    "GSh-23-6" is something new... lol

    But otherwise it's a good article, it'll do.
    1. -3
      21 September 2025 10: 57
      Yes, it was there on the first modifications of the GSh-30-6.
  16. 0
    21 September 2025 14: 05
    And now, irreplaceable Affective managers can reproduce similar weapons! Galoshes don't count! The Great Union never threatened anyone, but no one attacked us! Without teachers, there's no school! Wars are lost in schools!
  17. +1
    21 September 2025 14: 07
    An excellent aircraft, ahead of its time. It's still alive, flying, participating in the Air Defense Forces, and will still be useful. It's a source of pride. It's surprising there's so much negativity in the comments. It seems "Military Review" needs to write a similar article about the F-16 or F-15. Successful American aircraft from the same era are long-lived. Wouldn't that be less negative? It's worth a try.
  18. +1
    22 September 2025 10: 18
    The tasks that were set for the MiG-31 exist in only two countries in the world - the USA and the USSR (RF)
    The main task of the MiG-31 is to cover vast desert territories where it would be irrational to place a network of ground bases
    Therefore, it is not surprising that no one else has such machines, although the US has aircraft with similar functionality, but their entire air force is built somewhat differently.
  19. +1
    22 September 2025 14: 58
    An outstanding aircraft for its time.
  20. -2
    22 September 2025 18: 52
    It was a good airplane for the 70s. That era is long gone now. Those last planes from the early 90s (which are also now 30-35 years old) will quietly serve out their useful lives and retire.
    No one in the world designs pure interceptors today. As Mashina sang in her song "Heroes of Yesterday."
    Mig31, happy anniversary!
  21. -3
    22 September 2025 18: 54
    Quote: multicaat
    The tasks that were set for the MiG-31 exist in only two countries in the world - the USA and the USSR (RF)
    The main task of the MiG-31 is to cover vast desert territories where it would be irrational to place a network of ground bases
    Therefore, it is not surprising that no one else has such machines, although the US has aircraft with similar functionality, but their entire air force is built somewhat differently.

    There's no one left to catch up with. The last SR71 was decommissioned in 1993. That's it. Understand? That's it.
  22. 0
    17 January 2026 12: 48
    When they wanted to remove it from service, Zyuganov visited Putin twice on this issue and defended the plane.