What is the best way for a migrant to become a Russian citizen?
I take out from wide trousers a duplicate of a priceless cargo.
Read, be envious, I am a citizen of the Soviet Union.
"Poems about the Soviet Passport" by V. Mayakovsky
Read, be envious, I am a citizen of the Soviet Union.
"Poems about the Soviet Passport" by V. Mayakovsky
Opinion on the problem. So, a flood of foreign citizens has come to Russia and... after living here for a while, they successfully become citizens of our country. Men bring their "cloth-bound" women, who successfully produce equally cloth-bound girls and quite modern-looking boys, albeit of a slightly different racial type. Many Russians today are wondering: is this a good thing? Will our "melting pot" work, and after some time, the "clothed" will uncloth themselves, and will there be more of us, Russians as a whole—and specifically Russians as citizens of a single country, not a mishmash of enclaves of people from different countries? This would certainly be desirable, but the process is slow and very difficult. It creates many problems, both at the personal and national level. And so the question arises: can this "matter" somehow be facilitated, simplified, and made more manageable? And it turns out that if we think about it and change a few things in our legislation, then this process can be made quite manageable.
And there's not much that needs to be done to achieve this. Simply, obtaining citizenship for migrants in Russia will need to be made desirable, but... not so easily achievable. Well, like, for example, whitewashing Aunt Polly's fence in Mark Twain's "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer," who discovered the "great law" that to make a child or adult strongly desire something, all it takes is making it difficult to achieve. However, making it "not easy" requires taking into account one very important law: the law of generational succession, discovered in 1991, and the fundamental tenet of age-based pedagogy, which for some reason is often forgotten in our country. And that's precisely where we'll begin!
The essence of this principle is this: a child learns more about life in the first five years of their life than in all the years remaining until their death. Yes, they may, as adults, adapt to many things out of necessity, change countries, languages, and even religions, obtain an education, and become an excellent specialist in one field or another. But... those five years will remain the foundation of their mentality. That is, if they were raised in a "corridor system with one bathroom," it will never leave them, even if by the end of their life they live in an apartment with all the amenities. This is precisely why they say that you can take the girl out of the village, but you can't take the village out of the girl! However, the problems of "internal" migrants are of no interest to us today. For now, we are talking only about external ones.
The first settlers... They have it the hardest, and the five-year-old mentality stays with them their whole lives. But what about their children? It's like this: if they're sent to live with their grandparents for the summer, their mentality will likely be split fifty-fifty, with the summer being the most pleasant and the winter the most unpleasant. In the summer, you have your home village, kishlak, aul, a river, a forest, and loving grandparents. But what about the winter? School, tedious lessons, a strange life... It's tough!
But the children of the pioneers are having their own children. Their grandparents are already living in the city. All the stories about how good things were "out there" mean little to them. They could perceive Mars as just as good. And their mentality will be different: 75 and 25. And finally, the great-grandchildren, the result of a generational shift over 100 years. Here, their mentality will be 100% specific to this society, because they simply don't know any other way of life.
In other words, we will have a period of at least 100 years, during which, through both their own efforts and external societal pressure, the mentality of migrants arriving in our country will inevitably change, so that they will no longer pose any threat to our world order. And so, based on this, we will structure the process of migrants' integration into our Russian society. Upon arriving in Russia, a migrant who has expressed a desire to stay here permanently receives the status of "temporary citizen" for life and a passport with four colored squares on the cover. They enjoy all the rights of a Russian citizen, but cannot vote or be elected to government positions. Furthermore, any unlawful act will automatically result in a punishment four times heavier than that of a native Russian citizen! There's motivation to behave well, right? Incidentally, the most severe punishment (it can even be offered to the offender at his own discretion!) could be deportation with a five-year ban on entry. After this period, the deportee will be able to return, but all of his previous "achievements" will be annulled, and he will have to start his journey to Russian citizenship from scratch.
This person's son (or daughter) already has three squares on their passport, and the penalties for their illegal actions are no longer as severe. Their grandson or granddaughter receives a passport with two squares—meaning the cherished goal is getting closer and closer, until finally, the great-grandchildren of the original settlers receive passports identical to those of their native Russian comrades. By this time, their mentality will no longer be any different from theirs, and they can be considered full citizens of such a great country as Russia.
Will it be possible to somehow "straighten" this rather long and relatively difficult path? Yes, such a "straightening" must be provided. Recall the American science fiction film directed by Paul Verhoeven in 1997, based on Robert Heinlein's novel of the same name. It also depicts a society of citizens and non-citizens, the latter of which are not oppressed and live quite comfortably, although citizens enjoy a number of important benefits. Interestingly, the direct path to "citizenship" is linked there to government service, not necessarily military. However, the work must be responsible and challenging. So, in our case, this could very well be military service under contract, earning a combat medal, or impeccable service over a considerable period. But what if a person cannot serve in the army or work in the government—say, as a sewage worker? Then another path could be envisaged: charity! Let's say he donates one million a year to children with cancer for... 25 years, and then he again receives the right, so to speak, to take one step forward, that is, he receives a new passport, which has one less square on the cover.
Accordingly, his children can also take a more direct path and, after serving in the army or working in some responsible civilian position, remove another square from the cover. Such work for the country will undoubtedly contribute to the socialization of this individual and the "reforging" of his original mentality into something different and more useful for our entire society. And this will be a good "carrot" and an incentive to "live by the law," because the "stick," that is, greater punishment, has not been abolished either. This will force a person to "keep themselves within the bounds."
Of course, the adoption of such a system will inevitably provoke howls and reproaches in the West. But... how long can we look back at "how things are there"? With all our might historical We have proven through our development that “no one can tell us what to do,” and that we are quite capable of using our own wits and successfully developing within the socio-cultural paradigm of our Russian multinational community!
Information