MS-21 and import-substituting Superjet: products of the Russian aircraft industry

14 375 58
MS-21 and import-substituting Superjet: products of the Russian aircraft industry

The Russian civil aircraft industry is going through a period of large-scale transformation, at the center of which are two key projects - the medium-range MC-21 airliner and the updated Superjet, which has completely switched to a domestic component base. Their development determines not only the future of the national aviation industry, but also the prospects for the entire transport system of the country, especially in conditions of limited access to foreign technologies and markets.

The MS-21, developed by the Irkut Corporation, was conceived as a competitor to the world giants – the Airbus A320neo and Boeing 737 MAX. Despite the pressure of sanctions and the forced replacement of a number of imported systems, the project managed to maintain momentum and reach the final stage of certification tests.



One of the main achievements was the integration of the PD-14 power plant, the first fully Russian turbofan engine produced in our country in recent decades. At the same time, replacing foreign materials with domestic ones, including composite wings, required time and colossal efforts from designers, but in the end the aircraft retained the declared characteristics of fuel efficiency and flight range.

The MS-21 is scheduled to enter serial production next year, and this could be a turning point for the industry, giving airlines access to a modern airliner without dependence on foreign suppliers.

The updated Superjet, which received the index "Novy", was initially designed as a regional aircraft with a high level of comfort and efficiency. However, dependence on foreign components became a serious challenge. After the breakdown of many international supply chains, designers focused on creating a fully localized version of the airliner.

The key element of this program was the PD-8 engine, as well as domestic avionics and hydraulics systems. Despite the difficulties, the first pre-production aircraft with fully Russian equipment is already undergoing tests, and its mass production should begin in the near future.

For regional aviation, especially in hard-to-reach areas of the country, this project is of strategic importance, providing carriers with a reliable and independent tool for developing their route network.

It is worth noting that both aircraft not only reflect Russia's technological ambitions, but also shape a new industrial landscape. Hundreds of companies across the country are involved in the production of components and materials, which stimulates the development of related industries.

Meanwhile, in the context of sanctions and closed markets, the issue of competitiveness is becoming especially acute. Russia is unlikely to be able to count on large export contracts in the coming years, but the domestic market remains huge and requires modern aircraft.

Replacing the worn-out fleet of foreign aircraft with domestic models will be the most important task of the next decade. The success of these programs will determine whether the country will be able not only to provide its own airlines with equipment, but also to offer competitive solutions to friendly states in the future.

Ultimately, the MS-21 and Superjet are not just new aircraft. They symbolize the desire for technological independence and the readiness of Russian industry to adapt to new challenges. Their future is directly linked to how quickly they can establish serial production, ensure high quality and availability for air carriers.

If successful, the Russian aviation industry will have a chance not only to survive in the conditions of global restrictions, but also to reach a new level of development, forming its own standards in civil aviation.

58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    16 September 2025 09: 22
    This is what flirting with the West means. The result: the aircraft industry almost died.
    1. +19
      16 September 2025 09: 26
      Not a little. She died. So we have to go through the thorns again
      1. +4
        16 September 2025 10: 00
        The aircraft industry was destroyed by the creators of the Superjet! These names are well known... Yes, we can make a fuselage and create engines, but many aircraft factories for the creation of individual types of equipment with their design bureaus have been destroyed. They were left without orders and money in the 2000s, thanks to the "Eurodesigner" in the form of the Superjet of the Khristenko company... We will not have these aircraft in 2026 either. There will be show-off and cheerful and sad reports about nothing. In order to fly to the specified reliability, newly created aircraft equipment takes years and competition between factories within the country. And these factories in many positions have only just been created and in the singular... And the Superjet also has a problematic engine, hastily cobbled together!
        1. +5
          16 September 2025 10: 41
          Just recently I read the news that we have lost the production of bearings for the landing gear of passenger aircraft. It seems to have been published by a serious publication.
          1. +4
            16 September 2025 12: 03
            news that we have lost production of bearings for landing gear of passenger aircraft

            so all the factories became private and it is easier to demolish them - to build a shopping center or give the land for housing, than to resist and compete with the Chinese...
          2. +3
            16 September 2025 14: 17
            Quote: ASSAD1
            I recently read the news that we have lost the production of bearings for chassis

            At least half of the bearing factories closed and went bankrupt. And this mostly happened in the 2000s. Let me remind you that back then we were being showered with oil and dollars. The state was swimming in money and closing factories. High-ranking officials were directly saying: - Why should we do everything ourselves? We'll buy everything we need!
            And now these same people have staged a show of import substitution. Well done!
            1. -2
              6 October 2025 21: 14
              Quote: Stas157
              We'll buy everything we need.

              It was Gaidar who said this in the 90s, not the officials of the 00s. In the 2000s, factories that were no longer capable of existing were closed, often having only a territory and an office by that time.
      2. 2al
        +3
        16 September 2025 16: 56
        If we take it literally, then a noticeable technical and logistical infrastructure was created at Russian airfields to service Western aircraft, and it is worth remembering the Boeing-AVISMA joint venture and the design center of the same Boeing in Moscow. And to be honest, there are the full names and positions of our Russian figures who deliberately destroyed and sawed up the aviation industry inherited by the Russian Federation from the USSR. Moreover, Gref, Khristenko and Okulov openly and without hiding stated the reasons for which they were doing this.
  2. -1
    16 September 2025 09: 32
    At the same time, replacing foreign materials with domestic ones, including composite wings, required time and colossal efforts from the designers, but in the end the aircraft retained its declared characteristics in terms of fuel efficiency and flight range.

    There is no reality in the world in which it would be possible to preserve
    characteristics, using only "domestic materials".
    1. +4
      16 September 2025 09: 58
      The Superjet is overweighted by 700 kg. This is not a small amount. But in terms of range, this is a loss of 100 km; the standard version will fly not at 3000 km max, but at 2900.
      The MS-21 has a weight penalty of over a ton, our composite wing, which we made ourselves, is heavier, but still lighter than aluminum alloys. It also lost a little in range, from 5000 to 4800 km. Globally, these are not critical deteriorations. What we don’t know is how often they will break down. Downtime for repairs for airlines is very painful economically. Practice will give an answer to this question…
      1. -3
        16 September 2025 10: 07
        Quote: Glagol1
        The MS-21 has a weight gain of more than a ton; our composite wing, which we made ourselves, is heavier, but still lighter than one made from aluminum alloys.

        How much heavier and how much more expensive and unsuitable.
      2. 2al
        +1
        16 September 2025 16: 59
        As a result, it was not the composites that were overweighted, but the import-substituted mechanization units that are placed on the wing, for example, fire-fighting systems.
      3. -1
        9 November 2025 09: 35
        As Zakharov explains, import substitution led to an increase in the aircraft's empty weight, worsened aerodynamics (due to poor interference with the PD-14-pylon-wing system), and increased engine fuel consumption. In its "imported" form, the aircraft weighed 45,7 tons (empty, fully loaded). With a wing made of domestic composites, it weighed 47,1 tons, and when the PD-14 and Russian systems were installed, it reached 49,2 tons. And this is still just a calculated figure—it may not be met with the addition of all domestic systems, the expert warns.
    2. 0
      16 September 2025 09: 58
      Also, there is no such reality in the world (yet) that passenger planes are produced without the broadest international cooperation. But such a reality will soon come. And as for reaching the level of the best world models - it is hardly possible right away, and then - we'll see.
      And even the best world examples did not become like this immediately, but after years of improvement.
      1. +3
        16 September 2025 15: 56
        Quote from shikin
        there is no such reality in the world now (yet) that passenger planes are produced without broadest international cooperation.

        What did you say there? The broadest cooperation?
        Is this between your Western countries?
        The small world of Western countries is not the broadest cooperation. It is cooperation among our own. Even if some small stuff is taken from China or the Russian Federation, it does not mean that they will not be able to easily replace it. But here we have a completely different picture. And the production of Western aircraft and ours should not be put on the same level.
        1. +1
          19 September 2025 11: 37
          Is this between your Western countries?
          The main manufacturers of Boeing components are the USA, Europe (several countries), Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Canada, Australia, China, and Russia. And these are just the main suppliers.
          And the production of Western aircraft and ours should not be put on the same level.
          - Of course not. Just as there's no need to write about any kind of competition in the global market – the production capabilities are incomparable (even if our planes are significantly better).
          1. +2
            19 September 2025 12: 11
            Quote from shikin
            major manufacturers of components for Boeing

            Here are the main manufacturers of components and systems for Boeing aircraft (mainly using the 787, 777X, and 737 MAX models as examples):
            1. Fuselage
            Spirit AeroSystems (USA) – produces the main fuselage for:
            Boeing 737 (including MAX)
            The forward fuselage of the 787
            Also produces fins and tail units
            Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan) – produces the rear center fuselage and tail sections for the 787.
            Kawasaki Heavy Industries (Japan) – produces the 787 mid-fuselage section.
            Aernnova (Spain) – supplies fuselage components.

            2. Wings
            Boeing (USA) – wing development and final assembly (especially for the 777X).
            Spirit AeroSystems (Kansas, USA) – production of leading and trailing edges of the wing.
            Kawasaki Heavy Industries (Japan) – produces wing parts for the 787.
            FACC (Austria) – composite wing elements.
            GKN Aerospace (UK) – produces winglet components, particularly for the 737 MAX.

            3. Tail assembly (fin and stabilizers)
            Spirit AeroSystems (USA) – vertical tail (fin) for 737.
            Alenia Aermacchi (Italy, Leonardo) – horizontal tail for 787.
            Kawasaki Heavy Industries (Japan) – tail unit parts.

            4. Chassis
            Safran Landing Systems (France) – landing gear for 787 and 777.
            Collins Aerospace (USA, Raytheon Technologies) – landing gear for the 737 MAX.

            5. Engines (not manufactured by Boeing, but critical)
            Engines are supplied by independent companies:
            CFM International (a joint venture between Safran Aircraft Engines and GE Aviation) – LEAP-1B engines for the 737 MAX.
            Rolls-Royce – Trent 1000 for 787.
            General Electric (GE Aviation) – GEnx for the 787 and 747-8; GE9X – the most powerful turbofan engine in the world, for the 777X.
            Pratt & Whitney – was involved in the development of some engines, but is not a major supplier for modern Boeing jets.

            6. Avionics and control systems
            Collins Aerospace (Raytheon Technologies) – integrated avionics systems, cockpits.
            Honeywell (USA) – autopilot, navigation, flight control systems.
            Rockwell Collins (now part of Collins Aerospace) – displays, electronics.

            7. Life support systems, air conditioning, hydraulics
            Hamilton Sundstrand (part of RTX) – electrical and hydraulic systems, APU (auxiliary power unit).
            Liebherr-Aerospace (Germany/Switzerland) – air conditioning systems, hydraulics.
            1. 0
              6 October 2025 21: 17
              Quote: Stas157
              Here are the main manufacturers of components and

              It's no wonder Boeing's planes started falling apart with such a list... laughing
  3. +1
    16 September 2025 09: 45
    The West's strategy is to enter a country, kill competing industries and production, and sell beads/Coca-Cola to the locals. If they create some kind of production, it will not be a full cycle - fragmented.
    The red demon and his Chubaisites zombified the society with speeches - why should we make airplanes when Boeing makes them better, so let's buy them from him. We bought them.
    1. 0
      16 September 2025 10: 51
      Boeing is returning to Belarus. It may well return to us, the redhead will persuade Putin.
      1. bar
        +3
        16 September 2025 11: 15
        What do you mean, "comes back"? They will resume maintenance and repairs. Maybe. As for expanding the fleet, it's very unlikely. Batka is far from a loser to step on the same rake several times.
        1. +1
          16 September 2025 11: 21
          Father is not a loser and is multi-vector, he can swerve at any moment.
          1. bar
            0
            16 September 2025 11: 22
            After 2020, he has nowhere else to go.
            1. -1
              16 September 2025 12: 03
              People often "believe in the best" and take wishful thinking for reality. In my opinion, any person with critical thinking should have had the blinders removed from their eyes, even if they were there, regarding the West's aspirations, its "honesty" and desire for equal partnership. I hope Luka won't outsmart himself :)
        2. +1
          16 September 2025 12: 19
          Belavia has 13 Boeings, which is 2/3 of the fleet, 8 of which are very old, from the 1990s, they are 30 years old, and 5 are relatively young, 737-800. Thus, 8 aircraft need to be replaced, with younger or newer ones. But it is not a fact that it will be a Boeing. There are Embraers in the fleet, and they are effective, but permission still needs to be obtained from Boeing (!) The main trash of this year is that Belavia bought three A2-330s at once in Africa through 200 intermediaries. This is a large aircraft. It will be able to fly from Minsk to the Maldives and Seychelles, to the Russian Far East, to India and to Southeast Asia. The question of how to service and spare parts remains open - but apparently this has been resolved. The aircraft are not new, 22 years old, they flew for Emirates, but they will definitely fly for another 6-8 years. But they need service...
          Well, Trump is in his style - while Europe is chattering about the last dictator in Europe, he is clearing the market for the ailing Boeing. Of course, this is unlikely to help us in any way - I am sure that the condition for resuming the service will definitely be a ban on re-export. So this is a purely Belarusian story.
        3. bar
          +2
          17 September 2025 19: 40
          By the way, a correction has arrived.
          The US Department of Commerce has banned Belavia Airlines from operating Boeing flights to Russia and several other countries.

          In general, don't deny yourself anything. laughing
      2. +1
        16 September 2025 12: 08
        Boeing is returning to Belarus. It may well return to us too, The redhead will persuade Putin.

        Why should he persuade him?
        we'll come running ourselves against the backdrop of the "1000 planes" being released...
      3. +1
        16 September 2025 16: 02
        Quote: ASSAD1
        Boeing returns to Belarus.

        With a long-term goal. This is so that they, out of desperation, suddenly, do not start buying new Russian planes!
    2. 0
      16 September 2025 12: 06
      The Red Demon and His Chubais zombified society with speeches

      no, there are enough sane people, it's just that "they weren't allowed to say a word"...
      and Kvachkova, how can one not remember - but everyone is trying to forget this story...
  4. +4
    16 September 2025 09: 49
    ...and Pogosyan ends up on the board of directors of UZGA...
    1. +1
      16 September 2025 13: 03
      ...and Pogosyan ends up on the board of directors of UZGA...
      - genius laughing
    2. +2
      16 September 2025 17: 54
      Quote: Nexcom
      ...and Pogosyan ends up on the board of directors of UZGA...

      This is what they write on the Internet about the reformer Anatoly Serdyukov:

      "...In 2017, he was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors of PJSC Rostvertol and a member of the Management Board of PJSC United Aircraft Corporation (UAC). On May 8, 2019, he was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors of UAC. Under his leadership, the reform of the country's aviation industry is being prepared......"
      Are we waiting for positive reforms?
  5. 0
    16 September 2025 09: 59
    Irishmen who flew the SSJ remember the plane with kind words, except for the engines…
    1. +4
      16 September 2025 10: 04
      What do we have to do with it? The French designed and made the engines back then. Our guys were only allowed to work on the "cold" part. The problems were in the "hot" part, and that's what the French were making, and then they fought back from the problems. And they didn't give our guys permission to solve the problem themselves - like everything was fine there, like you Russians weren't servicing the engines properly.
      1. +1
        16 September 2025 10: 46
        Quote: Nexcom
        the problems were precisely in the "hot" part, and it was precisely this that the French were molding
        As the Irish said, the material for the sealing rings was chosen incorrectly: the engine was constantly 'weeping' oil, to the point of burning oil, which sometimes caused a wild stir among the firefighters... And the French seriously set up the Irish CityJet in front of the Belgians
    2. +3
      16 September 2025 10: 15
      By the way, the Mexicans liked it too. except for the engines. Now they're standing there by the fence and rotting without spare parts for the engines....
      1. 0
        16 September 2025 10: 42
        Quote: Nexcom
        now they stand there by the fence and rot without spare parts for the engines....
        Part of it stood by the fence in Venice, until recently
  6. +3
    16 September 2025 10: 02
    at the center of which were two key projects – the medium-range MC-21 airliner and the updated Superjet,

    Where did the Il-114 and the "An-2 replacement" go (so many empty names that it's easy to get it wrong)? And from the long-haul ones, only a couple of presidential Il-96s will remain, which he will fly to the BRICS countries?
    1. +3
      16 September 2025 10: 05
      questions to Pogosyan about the An-2 replacement - he is on the board of directors of UZGA. It turns out he got in there too. Result: the plane does not meet the issued state technical specifications in key areas, another couple of billions are needed for alterations and finishing.
      1. 0
        16 September 2025 12: 00
        An-2 replacement questions for Pogosyan - he is on the board of directors of UZGA. It turns out he got there too.

        last week they wrote that - left the SD UZGA
        1. +2
          16 September 2025 12: 15
          ...heh, probably when things started to smell bad again, he pulled the plug. Just like he did with the SSJ-100 project.
          1. -1
            23 September 2025 11: 14
            Billions spent, but no plane. So he screwed it off.
        2. 0
          16 September 2025 13: 05
          and where did you go, they didn't write?....... bully
          1. +1
            16 September 2025 13: 13
            ...people like Pogosyan won't be left without a place at the trough. That's right.
            so it will quietly surface somewhere again.
  7. +2
    16 September 2025 10: 07
    Ah, another reminder with general PR words that airplanes exist... or will exist.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  8. +3
    16 September 2025 10: 40
    The article reeks of a custom-made story a mile away. How many of these plans for the production of civilian aircraft have there been? With the deliberately killed aviation industry, it is unrealistic to increase production in a year or two for two series at once.
  9. +3
    16 September 2025 10: 40
    And the circulation of such aircraft should be appropriate, and not one or two machines per year.
  10. +2
    16 September 2025 10: 40
    I am still tormented by the question of whether anyone who destroyed the domestic aviation industry and made the decision to transfer our airlines to the Western fleet will answer before the law
    1. +2
      16 September 2025 11: 25
      I'm still wondering if anyone who destroyed the domestic aviation industry will answer.
      - They don't abandon their own...
    2. 0
      16 September 2025 11: 26
      No one will answer. There is no one or main culprit. As in Raikin's sketch "Who made the suit"? - collective responsibility.
  11. +2
    16 September 2025 11: 26
    The article reminds me of the 25th frame...
  12. 0
    19 September 2025 10: 22
    Everything goes its own way, as they say: "let's rejoice in little things...".
  13. 0
    8 October 2025 14: 12
    There is no clarity regarding the engines. Can anyone tell me which one has been put into production?
    1. 0
      11 October 2025 13: 37
      The entire Russian civil aviation industry is currently focused on one task: testing and certifying all new domestically produced aircraft that will be used in the next 30 years. Therefore, 2025 is a year of testing, with the PD-8 on the regional Superjet and the PD-14 on the medium-haul MS-21-310 being tested alongside all-Russian onboard equipment. Testing doesn't require a large number of engines, giving engine builders just the right amount of time to prepare for increased production volumes, procure and launch the necessary equipment, modernize facilities, improve staffing, and so on. Accordingly, judging by UAC and UEC news feeds, all of this work is proceeding vigorously.

      In 2026, engine builders are expected to deliver 28 PD-14 engines.
  14. 0
    19 October 2025 14: 22
    Quote: Alexey Sedykin
    Quote: Stas157
    Here are the main manufacturers of components and

    It's no wonder Boeing's planes started falling apart with such a list... laughing

    Well, yes, if 1000 planes are on paper, they won't fall apart. Paper, as the saying goes, will endure anything.
  15. 0
    19 October 2025 20: 58
    To rake in the dough, you don't need to make airplanes; you need to endlessly import-substitute them! In the Soviet Union, by that time, they would have designed, built, tested, and set up production from scratch and... (drumroll)...produced THOUSANDS of completely new airplanes. So no one is planning on perfecting them and mass-producing them.
  16. -1
    31 October 2025 00: 14
    Quote: marchcat
    This is what flirting with the West means. The result: the aircraft industry almost died.

    The Tupolev Design Bureau hasn't built a single new aircraft in 30 years. The Yak has built one production aircraft and one still in test configuration. The Ilyushin Il has built one test aircraft; the aircraft crashed, and the project is shelved.
    Ukrainian An made 2 production and 1 test aircraft.
  17. -1
    9 November 2025 09: 39
    What's the difference between the Superjet and the shortened MC21? Why were two identical planes with a bunch of foreign parts needed? More info-mongering from the effectives?