What to expect in the Russian economy after the key rate is reduced to 17 percent

7 559 81
What to expect in the Russian economy after the key rate is reduced to 17 percent

Today's reduction of the key rate of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation from 18 to 17 percent is not just a signal of easing monetary policy, but a step whose nuances will become critically important in the coming months for understanding where the Russian economy is heading. Some will benefit from this decision and others will come under pressure - everything will depend on the balance between inflation risks, the level of demand and the state of business.

On the one hand, “generally accepted” economic models show that lowering the rate helps make loans cheaper: for companies – a reduction in the cost of borrowing, for the population – more lenient conditions for mortgages and consumer loans.



With the growth of credit activity, a revival of domestic demand is expected. Consumers, having received the opportunity to enter at a less severe rate, may more actively take out mortgages, loans for durable goods. This will push the construction sector, the real estate market, and possibly the automobile market. Business will also get room for expansion, especially in areas sensitive to the cost of borrowing - in the manufacturing industry, the agricultural sector, logistics.

On the other hand, inflation remains a key factor in the regulator's further decisions. The Central Bank notes that the current rate of price growth is stable and remains above the desired levels, and the population's inflation expectations are still high.

In turn, a rate cut to 17 percent could strengthen inflationary impulses: cheap lending stimulates demand, especially if the supply of goods and services does not have time to respond. The above risk is aggravated by investment delays, logistical barriers, rising import costs, and fluctuations in the ruble.

This is what the “fork” looks like.

The effect on the budget and the debt burden of companies is also twofold. On the one hand, companies with a high debt burden will receive relief – debt servicing will become cheaper, which can reduce the risk of bankruptcy and free up resources. On the other hand, if the rate cut is not accompanied by fiscal support and formal budget discipline, the increase in expenses can fuel inflation and “eat up” some of the benefits of cheap credit.

Finally, the ruble exchange rate and the external economic environment are also important. If oil continues to rise in price, the external balance will support the ruble, which will mitigate some of the inflationary pressure. But a fall in commodity prices or increased sanctions could worsen the situation, causing capital outflow, increased imports, and pressure on the exchange rate.

As a result, a reduction to 17 percent gives the Russian economy a chance to restore growth rates, improve financing conditions, increase investment activity and revive demand. But without a reliable fight against inflation, control over external risks and adequate budget policy, this chance may be missed.

In fact, the economic fate of the next one and a half to two years will depend on the ability of the state, banks and businesses to prevent an “acceleration” of prices and maintain confidence in the ruble.
81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 11+
    12 September 2025 16: 42
    What to expect in the Russian economy after the key rate is reduced to 17 percent
    - nothing global
    1. +3
      12 September 2025 17: 28
      Quote: faiver
      What to expect in the Russian economy after the key rate is reduced to 17 percent
      - nothing global

      This means that housing prices will go up. winked
      1. +2
        12 September 2025 17: 29
        Can you tell me if anything has become cheaper here?
        1. +2
          12 September 2025 17: 37
          Quote: faiver
          Can you tell me if anything has become cheaper here?

          In my lifetime... I can't remember request
          1. +1
            12 September 2025 17: 38
            and with me too...
          2. 0
            12 September 2025 23: 41
            The 1998 crisis - at AvtoVAZ, you can't give more than two Zhiguli cars to someone, don't you remember that? And housing prices fell significantly. The winners were those who kept their cash in $ at home. And there were a lot of them.
        2. +7
          12 September 2025 18: 39
          Of course it got cheaper! Our labor is constantly getting cheaper, in order to get the same salary as before, you have to work more and more bully
        3. +1
          12 September 2025 19: 18
          Quote: faiver
          Can you tell me if anything has become cheaper here?

          The ruble is getting cheaper all the time and now it has started again.
        4. 0
          12 September 2025 21: 53
          Quote: faiver
          Can you tell me if anything has become cheaper here?

          The life of a man of our country. hi
      2. 0
        13 September 2025 06: 22
        Right now it's so expensive that no one is buying, where else can it go higher, but everyone is waiting for a 40% reduction in global prices for apartments
    2. +2
      12 September 2025 18: 05
      What to expect in the Russian economy after the key rate is reduced to 17 percent
      - nothing global

      In fact, investors and traders expected a decline to 16% and were greatly disappointed by the Central Bank's decision. As a result, the Moscow Exchange index fell by 2%.
      1. 0
        12 September 2025 18: 43
        Quote from Andy_nsk
        In fact, investors and traders expected a decline to 16% and were very disappointed with the Central Bank’s decision.

        Apparently only inveterate optimists. The September figures actually predisposed the Central Bank to caution, which resulted in a 1 p.p. decline. Incidentally, I expected this.
        But, I agree, the market and the currency were rather expecting 2 p.p., hence such a reaction.
      2. 0
        12 September 2025 19: 19
        Nobody will notice such a pittance. If they had reduced it by at least 2-3 points, it might have been noticeable.
        1. +1
          12 September 2025 19: 34
          Quote: Ross
          Nobody will even notice such a small amount.

          It's really a pittance, compared to the increase in taxes, for example, in my case it's more than doubled!
          1. 0
            12 September 2025 21: 29
            Quote: aybolyt678
            Quote: Ross
            Nobody will even notice such a small amount.

            It's really a pittance, compared to the increase in taxes, for example, in my case it's more than doubled!

            What tax did they raise for you? It was just that no change in rates was announced, I became interested.
            1. +1
              13 September 2025 09: 18
              the rate has not changed, but my type of activity was removed from the patent and I will have to switch to a simplified tax system, with today's income I will have to pay 2,6 times more
              1. +2
                13 September 2025 11: 08
                Quote: aybolyt678
                the rate has not changed, but my type of activity was removed from the patent and I will have to switch to a simplified tax system, with today's income I will have to pay 2,6 times more

                Hmm, a promotion without a promotion is in the spirit of the times. I sympathize, it is really painful....
        2. +3
          12 September 2025 20: 03
          It would be noticeable if they lowered it to at least 7. And at 17, the economy will continue to "cool down" to the point of rigor mortis...
  2. 10+
    12 September 2025 16: 44
    What to expect in the Russian economy after the key rate is reduced to 17 percent

    The death of industry, what else?
    1. +2
      12 September 2025 16: 48
      Isn't it the other way around?
      I thought the lower it was, the better for business.
      Well, it seems like loans are getting cheaper, but so are interest rates on deposits.
      1. +3
        12 September 2025 16: 51
        It is difficult to predict what will happen to the industry. But the fact that gasoline will become more expensive, regardless of this rate, and everything around it, is certain.
      2. 13+
        12 September 2025 17: 06
        this is when instead of 18 you have 5, and when instead of 18 you have 17, then it's like an owl hitting a stump, like a stump hitting an owl
      3. 12+
        12 September 2025 17: 09
        Quote: Hitriy Zhuk
        I thought the lower it was, the better for business.

        You were right. It's just that normal activity is possible with the Central Bank rate at 7%, but not at 17. And this reduction by one percent is a poultice for a dead man.
        1. 0
          12 September 2025 17: 10
          Then inflation will be high, which is much worse for business.
          1. +3
            12 September 2025 17: 17
            Quote: RondelR
            Then inflation will be high

            It is still space, it is just not officially recognized. The point is that there are other ways to limit inflation. It is just that the Central Bank lives in the monetarism paradigm, which is not surprising with such a leader... Never worked a day in a bank in their lives.
            And yes, inflation is better for production than such a Central Bank rate
            1. -2
              12 September 2025 17: 19
              It is still space, it is just not officially recognized.

              Go ahead, you can refute the official methodology, the Central Bank will pay you for it)
              The point is that there are other ways to limit inflation.

              Yes, there are, more painful and less effective.
              It's just that the Central Bank lives in the monetarism paradigm

              No, of course not, he lives in the mainstream paradigm.
              1. +1
                12 September 2025 17: 22
                Quote: RondelR
                Go ahead, you can refute the official methodology, the Central Bank will pay you for it)

                No. And you will find real alternatives to monetarism either in foreign economic textbooks (Keynesianism), from where, in fact, we took monetarism, or you can read Glazyev. He was a former presidential adviser, after all.
                1. -1
                  12 September 2025 17: 28
                  Well, it’s clear that there isn’t) all this is fairy tales about “real inflation”.
                  Keynesianism, monetarism? All this remained somewhere in the middle of the 20th century, everything has long since merged into the modern mainstream.
                  No, I prefer to read something serious about economics, not clowns)
                  1. +1
                    12 September 2025 17: 35
                    Quote: RondelR
                    No, I prefer to read something serious about economics.

                    It's very noticeable:))))))
                    1. -2
                      12 September 2025 17: 42
                      Well, yes, considering that I don’t fantasize about any real inflation and when trying to justify it I don’t give up)
                      1. +2
                        12 September 2025 18: 11
                        Quote: RondelR
                        I fantasize about any real inflation

                        You are just fantasizing. And you are fading away, because in response to my reference to sources, you simply stated
                        Quote: RondelR
                        All this was left somewhere in the middle of the 20th century.

                        And that's it. That's it - a drain.
                      2. -2
                        13 September 2025 00: 11
                        Sources? Which one? Glazyev or something?
                        And that's it. That's it - a drain.

                        Well, of course, you are writing nonsense. Right now the government is actively spending, increasing demand. This is part of Keynesianism. At the same time, the Central Bank is holding back inflation, one could say that this is somewhat similar to monetarism, only it is not quite it, monetarism was focused on the money supply, primarily trying to hold it back, only there is no direct correlation between inflation and the money supply, the "monetarists" did not take into account the factor of money circulation, the fact that it is not uniform, in addition, monetarists did not take into account other liquid assets besides M1 and M2. Modern fiscal policy is an idea from the 90s in New Zealand, then the Central Bank came to a method when it sets a target for inflation and uses all possible tools - interest rates, macroeconomic indicators, communication. The approach has changed, the Central Bank directly says that its target for inflation is this and it will achieve it with all tools.
                        Another important difference is that monetarism is a much bigger idea, it is generally about how the state should achieve growth, it affects both budget expenditures and unemployment and all areas of macroeconomics in essence. Modern fiscal policy is only the Central Bank, it does not concern the rest of the state policy. Thus, methods from Keynesianism can be combined with fiscal policy, which we saw in the crisis of 2008 or 2020.
                      3. +1
                        13 September 2025 07: 22
                        Well, let's take a look at what you wrote here.
                        Quote: RondelR
                        monetarism focused on the money supply first and foremost, trying to contain it

                        Monetarism did not try to "restrain" anything; it was responsible for ensuring that the money supply corresponded to demand and the goods produced.
                        Quote: RondelR
                        but there is no direct correlation between inflation and money supply, the "monetarists" did not take into account the factor of money circulation,

                        So, does the new policy take them into account? And how, may I ask?
                        Quote: RondelR
                        Modern fiscal policy is an idea from the 90s in New Zealand, when the Central Bank came to a method where it sets a target for inflation and uses all possible instruments: interest rates, macroeconomic indicators, communication.

                        Firstly, not from the 90s, but from the 80s. Secondly, if you had started from scratch, as I suggested, you would have known that
                        1) Monetarism ORIGINALLY set its main goal as inflation management. One of the main provisions of monetarism is that an increase in the money supply leads to an increase in production, and after full capacity utilization, to an increase in prices and inflation. And the goal of monetarism is precisely to establish maximum employment with minimal inflation.
                        2) Monetarism limited its influence on inflation to the money supply only at the very early stage, which it immediately abandoned. This also included open market operations with government bonds, etc., changes in the reserve requirement, changes in the interest rate. And also (surprise, yes) government spending, including social spending.
                        Moreover, the US has been managing the interest rate within the framework of monetarism since the 70s of the last century.
                        And if you had taken the trouble to study at least the basics of economics, you would have known how the banking multiplier works, and why, within the framework of the "cheap money/expensive money" policies, a change in the interest rate directly affects the amount of money in circulation.
                        Thus, the "inflation targeting" in New Zealand that you write about is simply a specification of the goal achieved by the policy of monetarism, and not some kind of theory separate from it.
                        With that, allow me to take my leave, because the enlightenment of people who defend their delusions with “completely unbearable impudence” is not one of my life priorities.
                      4. -2
                        13 September 2025 09: 21
                        Monetarism did not try to "restrain" anything; it was responsible for ensuring that the money supply corresponded to demand and the goods produced.
                        This is not true, the money supply is the main indicator and its excessive growth leads to an increase in inflation, that is what they thought, this is the monetarist concept of inflation.

                        So, does the new policy take them into account? And how, may I ask?
                        No, she doesn’t take it into account; she strives for the final goal; these factors are not interesting to her.

                        1) Monetarism ORIGINALLY set its main goal as inflation management. One of the main provisions of monetarism is that an increase in the money supply leads to an increase in production, and after full capacity utilization, to an increase in prices and inflation. And the goal of monetarism is precisely to establish maximum employment with minimal inflation.
                        This is not true, monetarism is much more than just inflation. It is also about regulation and unemployment, not just inflation, Milton Friedman claimed this from the very beginning.

                        2) Monetarism limited its influence on inflation to the money supply only at the very early stage, which it immediately abandoned. This also included open market operations with government bonds, etc., changes in the reserve requirement, changes in the interest rate. And also (surprise, yes) government spending, including social spending.
                        Well, that is, you yourself confirm that we do not have monetarism) since the Central Bank is not capable of what you described, well done!

                        And if you had taken the trouble to study at least the basics of economics, you would have known how the banking multiplier works, and why, within the framework of the "cheap money/expensive money" policies, a change in the interest rate directly affects the amount of money in circulation.
                        What is this for?) I know very well what a banking multiplier is.

                        Thus, the "inflation targeting" in New Zealand that you write about is simply a specification of the goal achieved by the policy of monetarism, and not some kind of theory separate from it.
                        You're getting confused, you yourself just wrote about monetarism as much more than just the rate and the Central Bank's measures) here are your words:
                        And also (surprise, yes) government spending, including social spending.
                      5. 0
                        13 September 2025 09: 55
                        Quote: RondelR
                        This is not true

                        As I already said,
                        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                        educating people who defend their delusions with "completely unbearable impudence" is not one of my life priorities

                        For starters, read at least "Economics" by Brew and McConnell.
                      6. -1
                        13 September 2025 09: 59
                        I clearly pointed out to you that today there is no monetarism in Russia in its pure form, and the Russian Federation adheres to the modern mainstream and not to orthodox currents in economics. You could not refute this, what is the point of all this reading and so on?
          2. +7
            12 September 2025 17: 18
            There's no point in raising fuel prices, curb the appetites of retail chains and oil profiteers
            with regular growth of transport costs it doesn't matter what the rate is, prices will still rise
            1. -1
              12 September 2025 17: 19
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              There's no point in raising fuel prices

              How can they not inflate the prices when loans are 20+%?
              1. +8
                12 September 2025 17: 21
                let's be honest, fuel prices are not rising because of loans, they were rising both at low rates and at high rates, this is solely due to the lack of any limits on the appetites of traders
                1. -1
                  12 September 2025 17: 24
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  Let's be honest, fuel prices are rising not because of loans

                  Of course. And also from losses in foreign trade activities. Look at the losses Gazprom shows
                  1. +1
                    12 September 2025 17: 26
                    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                    Look at the losses Gazprom is showing

                    Most of these are paper losses, otherwise we would have gone out into the world
                    1. 0
                      12 September 2025 17: 36
                      These are real losses. But they drew paper profits for themselves last year... Or 23? I can't figure it out right away.
                      1. -2
                        12 September 2025 18: 45
                        Don't make anyone laugh, with such REAL losses the company is closing down
                      2. +3
                        12 September 2025 19: 31
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        Don't make anyone laugh, with such REAL losses the company is closing down

                        My dear, as the financial director of a large enterprise, which I have been for the last.... it's scary to remember how many years (and every few years I change jobs), I responsibly declare to you - you cannot imagine the REAL losses that enterprises operate under:))))
                      3. -1
                        12 September 2025 20: 50
                        The law of conservation of matter also applies in economics.
                        In order to work like this you need a huge chest with a stash
                2. 0
                  12 September 2025 18: 50
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  let's be honest, fuel prices are not rising because of loans, they were rising both at low rates and at high rates, this is solely due to the lack of any boundaries the appetites of traders

                  I'll correct you a little so that there is no misunderstanding.
                  Moscow. September 30. INTERFAX.RU - The Russian government has planned an additional increase in excise taxes on petroleum products in 2025-2027, follows the draft amendments to the Tax Code.
                  Thus, it is proposed to establish an excise tax on motor gasoline that does not meet class 5: in 2025 - 17 rubles per ton, in 518 - 2026 rubles per ton, in 18 - 219 rubles per ton.
                  1. 0
                    12 September 2025 21: 42
                    the difference per ton is a little more than 700 rubles, that is, an annual increase of 57 kopecks per liter
                    How much has gasoline gone up in price this year?
            2. 0
              12 September 2025 17: 21
              The Central Bank can't do that) it's not the one that regulates excise taxes and other things)
              Well, yes, the actions of the Central Bank and the growth of fuel are holding back) indirectly.
              1. +2
                12 September 2025 17: 23
                excise tax is constant, oil becomes more expensive - gasoline goes up, oil gets cheaper, gasoline goes up again
                This has nothing to do with excise taxes, it is the lack of government regulation and conscience of traders
                1. -5
                  12 September 2025 17: 29
                  What does oil have to do with rising prices? Do you think that we buy oil on the exchange or something?
                  lack of government regulation and conscience among traders

                  Our oil industry is the most regulated area)
                  1. 0
                    12 September 2025 17: 34
                    Quote: RondelR
                    What does oil have to do with rising prices? Do you think that we buy oil on the exchange or something?

                    I have no more questions
                    1. -4
                      12 September 2025 17: 44
                      Well, it's good that you understood. You can also read about how the price of fuel is formed in Russia, and especially about seasonality)
                      1. 0
                        12 September 2025 18: 47
                        Quote: RondelR
                        and especially about seasonality)

                        Are you now going to tell us that the cost price will critically depend on the season of the year?
                      2. -2
                        12 September 2025 23: 45
                        I won’t say anything, look at the growth of fuel prices over the years, month by month.
                2. 0
                  12 September 2025 21: 14
                  Dear Vasilenko, I agree with you completely, but you didn't dig deeper) QR codes for products from whose pocket? Considering that this is complete crap. A lyrical digression, I smoke, in our Volga region there are official cigarette sellers (out of quality) and there are supposedly kiosks with "left" products at a price 2 times cheaper (out of quality) and no one "sees" it (many workers save themselves with this, because they smoke, and the family budget is not elastic). Screw it, you raise excise taxes, and who will monitor the quality? (I'm just comparing the quality of Winston now and 5 years ago).
                  1. +1
                    12 September 2025 21: 43
                    Quote: Vinnibuh
                    QR codes for products from whose pocket?

                    from ours, as well as useless colored packaging of medicines, etc.
            3. +2
              12 September 2025 17: 35
              There's no point in raising fuel prices, curb the appetites of retail chains and oil profiteers
              - Excuse me, but our main oil profiteer is the state, 60% of the price of fuel is taxes - mineral extraction tax, VAT and excise taxes.....
              1. 0
                12 September 2025 18: 44
                Are you saying that the tax percentage is increasing every month?
        2. -1
          12 September 2025 17: 18
          And even today the Central Bank considered the question of whether to leave the rate at 18% or reduce it by 1 bp.
        3. +6
          12 September 2025 18: 06
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          o normal activity is possible with the Central Bank rate at 7%, but not at 17.

          That's right. But even a 7% interest rate is too much for the ghouls of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, a normal rate is no higher than 3-5%, and even God forbids bankers to take rates higher than 5%. Moreover, no more than 5% is the final interest rate for the client, and not for resale of the loan by their commercial banks.
          But this 1% reduction is the reaction of the "masters of money" to the BRICS decision to establish their own settlement center as an alternative to this disgrace. In the fall of 2005, we agreed with them in the Russian Federation that we would reverse the Financial Reform, we would not abolish commercial, private and foreign banking in the Russian Federation, abolish the Central Bank in the Russian Federation and return the State Bank and the Treasury (as an emission center), we would not revoke the licenses of all commercial and foreign banks in Russia, leaving only a few industry State Banks with their branches... But in return for this, they solemnly promised us that they ARE OBLIGATED to provide loans to our Economy, our enterprises, businesses and citizens at a NORMAL interest rate... albeit in foreign currency.
          Such was the Treaty.
          And it was violated on 24.02.2022. And if for the first six months of the SVO the head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation sat quietly as a mouse, as a result of which the ruble exchange rate went up, and the budget revenues and our exporters went off the charts... then after that those very Games of Nabiullina began to accelerate inflation, the collapse of the ruble and, as a result, the raising of the Central Bank's key rate from the IMF into space.
          The difficulties of the war period limit the state's ability to restore order to the financial market and put an end to this Feast of Ghouls, without the risk of financial and economic collapse... But this was so while the scales in the North-East were oscillating and while the West was consolidated. Now everything is different. The new BRICS clearing center and the practical cessation of legal trade with the EU and the USA allow us to get rid of this entire bloodsucking gang in Russia. In any case, all the prerequisites for this are there.
          The rate cut by 1% is a signal from the shareholders of the Fed, the ECB, the IMF and their branch in Russia (the Central Bank in the Russian Federation) about their desire... to talk. To enter into negotiations. A condition was set and a sign was named - if the Central Bank cuts the rate by 1%, it means the demiurges want to come to an agreement. I don't know if it's worth it, but if they still want to remain either a carcass or a scarecrow... the rate will have to be cut immediately by at least another 10% and to 3-3,5% by the end of the first ten days of next year. Unblocking all accounts, returning ALL assets, compensating ALL losses from the exploded Streams... And - get out of the former Ukraine! For this is Indigenous Russia-Rus.
          Otherwise - collapse and ruin of the World Dollar System.
          It can no longer be saved, but with some agreements a “soft landing” can be ensured and the US dollar can be preserved as one of the world’s reserve currencies.
          It seems Trump is ready for something like this, but the English and European shareholders of the Federal Reserve System, which is in the USA, are resisting. Now these deep-seated people want to "talk". But they don't want to give in and don't know how, so it's unlikely that they will come to an agreement. However, let's look at the events of the next two weeks.
    2. 0
      12 September 2025 19: 31
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      The death of industry, what else?

      Good evening, Andrey. And you, as an economist, what decline did you predict?
      1. +5
        12 September 2025 19: 36
        Quote: Adrey
        Good evening, Andrey. And you, as an economist, what decline did you predict?

        I predicted a collapse by July of this year, and in principle, it is already like that. Manufacturers of equipment, agricultural, road, construction, etc. are in the out, production has fallen many times over. Construction is at a standstill. Metallurgists - now the government is going to introduce a moratorium on bankruptcy for them, in 2025 revenue has fallen by a quarter. The Mechel Group has a loss of 40 billion for the first half of the year.
        In short... Elvira has played herself out.
  3. +4
    12 September 2025 16: 55
    You shouldn't expect anything serious, any changes...
    With loans everything is already tough... a slight decrease in the key rate will practically not change anything...
  4. +3
    12 September 2025 16: 55
    the question is as if they reduced it to at least 6%
  5. +1
    12 September 2025 16: 56
    What mortgage? I just went to the website of the most famous bank, they calculated a 5 million mortgage loan - over 20% per annum!
  6. 0
    12 September 2025 17: 02
    A financial noose around the necks of Russian citizens.
  7. +1
    12 September 2025 17: 06
    The main thing is that Musk's super rocket flew successfully :))
    I dream of living on Mars :))
    Childhood dream.
    1. +1
      12 September 2025 18: 31
      This rocket needs to fly successfully at least 10-15 more times, into orbit and back, to even send it to the Moon. But Musk is clearly making progress.
      I also had a childhood dream, but now I'm old, and in Russia they've forgotten how to fly into space. Only to orbit and like a dog on a leash.
  8. +5
    12 September 2025 17: 21
    Nothing good. Because 17%, 20 or 100% - it's death for the economy.
    ps Once upon a time, for the collapse of the Soviet economy and the subsequent collapse of the USSR, the "spotted reptile" Gorbachev was awarded the title of "Best German of the Year". I wonder what will eventually be awarded to E.S. Nabiullina:
    - the best CIA agent
    - the biggest fool in history
    - the most stubborn Tatar woman in Russia
    Name suggestions are welcome.
    1. +1
      12 September 2025 20: 19
      The other day, VVP said that the Central Bank is running our business very professionally, and those who want to produce something in their manufacturing facilities should know this.
      So, her name is professional.
      There are amateurs, but this one is definitely a professional...
    2. -2
      13 September 2025 01: 44
      The president himself appointed her and she does what the Kremlin tells her to do.
      So don't go against the president.
      1. 0
        13 September 2025 05: 51
        She does what the Kremlin tells her to do.

        In fact, the Kremlin is a complex of buildings and structures. And only intelligence can give instructions - natural or artificial, which in the first case must have a name and surname, and in the second - a name/brand.
  9. 0
    12 September 2025 17: 23
    for the population – more lenient conditions for mortgages and consumer loans.
    wassat
    At 17% KS, consumer/mortgage/auto loans will be at least 20++%. Very soft conditions, yeah... laughing
  10. K_4
    +5
    12 September 2025 17: 24
    Our economy is already like that terminator diving into a ladle of metal with his thumb raised.
  11. +1
    12 September 2025 18: 10
    With the war, we will have high inflation no matter what. So there is no point in strangling the economy with high rates. And they strangled it to the point that familiar oil companies are operating at a loss.
  12. +1
    12 September 2025 18: 52
    And AI 95 gasoline in our town already costs 70 rubles.
  13. -3
    13 September 2025 04: 42
    What's the point of such a reduction, by one percent? For the population it doesn't matter whether 18 or 17 is still expensive, but the fact that the dollar immediately soared to 85, well, that will quickly have an effect. So it's better if they don't touch this rate.
    1. -1
      13 September 2025 05: 53
      the dollar immediately soared to 85, then this will have an effect quickly. So it's better if they don't touch this rate.

      Why do you need dollars? Or do you not pay in rubles?
  14. +2
    13 September 2025 06: 17
    What are you all yelling about?
    Go dig your garden beds, the potatoes are ready, here's your economy. :))
  15. 0
    13 September 2025 09: 20
    Nothing will change. Absolutely nothing. Small businesses are dying, large businesses are barely breathing. The high interest rate has killed cheap loans, without which the economy does not develop.
  16. 0
    14 September 2025 00: 49
    prevent price inflation and maintain confidence in the ruble.

    Yes, from November they will pump out a new recycling fee, the serfs will be completely stunned by the cost of the carts... In Nepal, of course.