Evolution of Geranium: Stronger, Smarter, More Resilient

18 209 36
Evolution of Geranium: Stronger, Smarter, More Resilient

In the previous article The Geranium Revolution: Changing the Face of War we examined the phenomenon of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) kamikaze of the "Geran" family, which in many ways changed (added) to the appearance of modern high-precision weapons long-range. We discussed the current and future production volumes of these products, as well as the change in tactics for their use - moving from low to high altitudes.

However, this is far from a complete list of changes that the kamikaze UAVs of the Geranium family have undergone during their evolution, and which we will talk about today.



Let's start with the fact that they became more powerful.

Increasing the power of the BC


Based on open data, the first versions of the Geran-2 kamikaze UAV were equipped with high-explosive fragmentation (HE) warheads weighing about 50 kg. It would seem that this is not a small amount, for comparison, the mass of the warhead of the Grad multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) is 18,4 kg (including 6,5 kg of explosive), artillery A 152mm projectile weighs 44 kg (including 7,8 kg of explosive).

However, what may be sufficient for a tactical class weapon is not always acceptable for a strategic class weapon, to which the kamikaze UAV of the Geranium family can be attributed. For comparison, the mass of the warhead of the winged missiles (KR) of the Kalibr complex is 500 kg, and the modified aviation The warhead weight of the Kh-101 cruise missile is approximately 1 ton.

During the modernization process, a high-power warhead weighing about 2-90 kilograms was installed on the Geran-100 UAV, which may have slightly reduced its flight range. Apparently, Geran family UAVs with warheads of varying power are currently being produced simultaneously.


However, the matter was not limited to simply increasing the warhead power – judging by the information posted in open sources, cluster warheads were also created for the Geranium family of kamikaze UAVs.

In the material Incendiary warheads for kamikaze UAVs of all types: an objective need of the SVO We talked about the feasibility of developing incendiary warheads for kamikaze UAVs, which could be effectively used to completely destroy enemy targets, especially when carrying out joint strikes with kamikaze UAVs equipped with HE warheads. Even an HE warhead weighing about 90-100 kg in most cases will not be able to completely destroy the target, whereas a hit by an incendiary warhead can start a fire, which will ultimately cause much greater damage.

Well, according to some data, incendiary warheads for the Geran family of kamikaze UAVs have also already been created, and they are quite "evil". The use of various types of warheads in the Geran family of UAVs allows for their flexible use to destroy various types of objects.

In a group attack, warheads of one type will complement and enhance the effect of warheads of another type. For example, an important structure may be attacked by one kamikaze UAV of the Geran-2 type with an HE warhead, followed by a kamikaze UAV with an incendiary warhead flying into the already damaged building, which will cause a fire, and a UAV with a cluster warhead will destroy and damage equipment and manpower located nearby. A delay may be set on some of the submunitions of a cluster warhead, which will require the enemy to first clear the area of ​​mines and complicate the extinguishing of the fire.


However, in the process of their improvement, the Geraniums became not only “stronger”, but also “smarter”.

On-board intelligence


Initially, the kamikaze UAVs of the Geran family were designed to hit only stationary targets, and even now this task is a priority. Strikes at stationary objects with known coordinates are carried out using signals from satellite navigation systems, which can be supplemented by an inertial guidance system and optical image recognition systems at the final stage.

The Geran-2 kamikaze UAV initially used control based on signals from the domestic GLONASS satellite navigation system. Naturally, the enemy began to use electronic warfare equipment to jam the kamikaze UAV navigation systems (EW), both those provided by Western countries and those developed independently, as a result of which their accuracy began to decline.

Our response was to improve the Geranium navigation system, including the Kometa family of receiving modules. The confrontation between electronic warfare and navigation systems continues to this day, and there will be no end to it until fundamentally unjammable navigation systems based on new physical principles appear. (and such are already being developed).


The Kometa-M equipment block from the UMPK module

The next stage was the appearance of feedback on the kamikaze UAVs of the Geranium family – the enemy had detected fragments of the Geraniums with cellular modems and video cameras installed on them.

In this configuration, video cameras do not allow control of kamikaze UAVs in real time, like FPV-drone, but it is possible to receive reconnaissance data during the UAV's flight, as well as to understand whether the kamikaze UAV has reached its target. Also, theoretically, such kamikaze UAVs can be given / changed target designation in flight.


There are modifications of the kamikaze UAVs of the Geran family that can be controlled as FPV drones; they are used near the combat contact line (CCL), within the range of radio control channels. According to enemy resources, communication antennas are installed on their wingtips – such Geraniums can effectively hit even moving objects.

And finally, there was information about the Geraniums equipped with satellite terminals of the Starlink system. Such products can be controlled as FPV drones throughout Ukraine and pose a particular danger to the enemy, for example, the operator can direct such a drone directly into the open door of a hangar in which an F-16 fighter is located.

The problem is that the increased damage from the Geranium family of kamikaze UAVs has led to the enemy actively hunting them down, using all the resources at their disposal.

Increased security


In the previous article we already talked about the fact that in order to protect themselves from Ukrainian mobile patrols armed with powerful searchlights and machine guns with thermal imaging sights, the Geraniums began flying at the highest possible altitude, which is about three to four kilometers.

Additionally, measures were taken to reduce the visual visibility of the drones - if in the first years all the "Geraniums" were white, now they are painted with a special paint that absorbs over 90% of the incident light - it is much more difficult to visually detect such a UAV in the dark.


According to information published in a number of Telegram channels, Russian long-range kamikaze UAVs have received a mass-produced and installed system for evading attacks by enemy FPV interceptors. The essence of this system is that upon detection of a video signal coming from an enemy FPV interceptor, the Russian UAV automatically performs an evasive maneuver, sharply changing the direction and altitude of its flight.

The range and flight time of FPV drones are quite limited, especially at high altitudes, so the enemy operator only has a few attempts. Such systems have previously appeared on our reconnaissance drones.

There are also other ways to increase the security of the long-range kamikaze UAVs of the Geran family.

For example, in the material Towed decoys for the Geran-2 UAV will reduce the effectiveness of Ukrainian air defense systems by 1,5–2 times We talked about the possibility of using light towed decoys, which are essentially a corner reflector placed in a plastic fairing, to protect the Geranium kamikaze UAV from radar-guided anti-aircraft missiles (SAMs).

With minimal cost, weight and volume of changes made to the design of kamikaze UAVs, towed decoys could significantly reduce the effectiveness of the enemy's most complex anti-aircraft missile systems (SAMs), multiplying the consumption of their expensive and few SAMs.


We looked at another method in the material Increasing the protection of reconnaissance UAVs from FPV interceptors, where it was proposed to install small onboard self-defense systems on reconnaissance UAVs to protect them, providing functional suppression of video cameras of attacking enemy FPV drones using commercially available laser emitters with a power of several watts. Such an onboard self-defense system can be integrated with the evasion system we discussed above.

At the moment, there is no information in open sources about UAVs of any type with towed false targets or on-board self-defense systems against FPV drones, but who knows, maybe they will appear again, after all, the Geraniums did not immediately start flying at high altitudes. And if the implementation of an on-board self-defense system is a fairly complex task, then installing a towed false target is a simple and inexpensive way to protect our drones.

It is also potentially possible to significantly reduce the visibility of the kamikaze UAV of the Geranium family by placing the engine and propeller under an annular fairing - an impeller. Impeller or fenestron (trade name of the company "Eurocopter") somewhat reduces the efficiency of the propeller, but in this case the hot zones of the piston engine will be almost completely shielded, and the reflection of radio signals from the rotating propeller will reach the antennas of the enemy's air defense missile system radar stations only at limited observation angles, from the front and rear hemispheres.


Of course, all the above solutions will somewhat reduce the range of the Geranium family kamikaze UAV or the weight of the warhead. However, if our current range is 1000-1500 kilometers, and we need to work at a range of up to 500-700 kilometers, then wouldn't it be better to trade range for protection?

By the way, information periodically appears about more radical ways to increase the protection of the Geran family of kamikaze UAVs, namely, equipping them with air-to-air missiles. The topic is quite controversial for several reasons. Firstly, air-to-air missiles have a fairly large mass. Secondly, the question arises of how to determine the moment of attack and give the missile target designation?

However, there are possible solutions, for example, not air-to-air missiles, but a “tube” of a portable anti-aircraft missile system (MANPADS), and they can only be installed on those modifications of the Geranium family of kamikaze UAVs that are equipped with feedback devices, such as Starlink terminals.

Conclusions


It is hardly correct to say "kamikaze UAV "Geran"" now, no matter whether it is "Geran-2" or some other designation. The reality is that the correct formulation, apparently, remains only "kamikaze UAV of the "Geran" family".

And within this family there will be various Geraniums – guided by coordinates, by radio channel and by satellite communication, with different flight ranges, different types of warheads and body colors, with means of increasing survivability and without them. Together, a swarm of Geraniums of various types will provide the most effective impact on the enemy, taking into account the types of targets attacked and the tasks to be solved.

However, this is not the end yet stories – in the next article we will consider various methods of radically increasing the speed of the Geran family of kamikaze UAVs, which brings them closer in characteristics to “real” cruise missiles, as well as the specifics of launching the Geran kamikaze UAV from various platforms.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    11 September 2025 04: 07
    In light of the SVO and a possible war with NATO, the production of Geranium family UAVs must be increased by an order of magnitude so that no air defense/missile defense system could repel the attack. Massive Geranium bombings of Nazi Ukraine will destroy its economy and production.
    1. +3
      11 September 2025 04: 30
      However, this is not the end of the story.

      It is important for us that the first steps have been taken!!!
      The very fact that our enemies allow Russia to carry out daily strikes with two thousand UAVs simply evokes admiration and pride in the capabilities of our military industry, which cannot be overshadowed even by some of the peculiarities of private ownership of the means of production.
    2. +4
      11 September 2025 06: 18
      It is already necessary to calculate production based on the possible imminent need for massive bombing of the entire Nazi Gayropa.
      1. +1
        11 September 2025 06: 55
        Quote: paul3390
        It is already necessary to calculate production based on the possible imminent need for massive bombing of the entire Nazi Gayropa.

        That's what I'm talking about. Warehouses should be jam-packed and securely protected. Better to store in tunnels, like in Iran. All of Eastern Europe should understand that it will be wiped out by hundreds of thousands of conventional Geraniums without any nuclear war. Washington will simply shake its hands and say that it has nothing to do with it, like it did after the Ukrainian provocation in Poland.
        1. +3
          11 September 2025 07: 55
          Effectiveness should not outweigh effectiveness. What are the results of using "Gerania"? The Allies in WWII smashed German cities to rubble, but infantry had to take them. And for example, weapons production fell only as German territory was captured.
          1. -1
            11 September 2025 08: 09
            Quote: Civil
            Effectiveness should not outweigh effectiveness. What are the results of using "Gerania"? The Allies in WWII smashed German cities to rubble, but infantry had to take them. And for example, weapons production fell only as German territory was captured.

            Well, yes... Dresden was taken in two days, and Poznan in a month. And the bombings were selective... almost all the synthetic gasoline factories were destroyed, the oil refining industry and oil fields of Romania were destroyed. There were constant strikes on aircraft factories. There were practically no strikes on ammunition factories.
            1. +3
              11 September 2025 09: 16
              There were practically no attacks on ammunition factories.

              so this production had American roots...
          2. +5
            11 September 2025 08: 19
            Quote: Civil
            Effectiveness should not outweigh effectiveness. What are the results of using "Gerania"? The Allies in WWII smashed German cities to rubble, but infantry had to take them. And for example, weapons production fell only as German territory was captured.

            The Russian Federation strikes the fuel and energy complex of Nazi Ukraine from time to time. The problem is that the assets of the fuel and energy complex of Ukraine include Russian, Azerbaijani and some other businesses. It would have been possible to destroy all power plants, oil refineries, gas pumping stations, etc. long ago. Ukraine would simply live by candlelight. And this would have significantly brought our Victory closer. Gerani can play a big role in this. But there is no team yet. After the Ukrainian strikes on our oil refineries, we slightly repaired their oil refineries, but did not destroy them.
            So it is too early to speak about the effectiveness of Geranium’s work due to the lack of political will.
          3. 0
            11 September 2025 16: 52
            The Allies in WWII razed German cities to rubble
            so they bombed residential areas. In Japan they bombed several factories and the Japanese almost completely lost their planes
    3. +4
      11 September 2025 09: 43
      Quote: Bearded
      Massive Geranium bombing of Nazi Ukraine will destroy its economy and production.

      They have already been destroyed. In fact, there is a government apparatus for Western donations and production distributed mainly in garages. Geraniums are a tool that is effective mainly in attacks on infrastructure - large buildings, large objects like power grid substations, thermal power plants or hangars, warehouses, parking lots. Personally, I do not see the need for a multiple increase in the number of geraniums. An increase of 2-4 times is possible. But more is a question. You will get tired of looking for targets for them.
  2. +1
    11 September 2025 06: 53
    By the way, information periodically appears about more radical ways to increase the protection of the Geran family of kamikaze UAVs, namely, equipping them with air-to-air missiles. The topic is quite controversial for several reasons. Firstly, air-to-air missiles have a fairly large mass. Secondly, the question arises of how to determine the moment of attack and give the missile target designation?
    Firstly, it is necessary to develop air-to-air interceptor missiles, small in weight and dimensions, as is done in NATO! Such interceptors are designed to counter enemy SAMs and RAVs at short range from the protected aircraft, have small weight and dimensions ... (for example, one of the anti-missiles being developed is 1 meter long and weighs 10 kg!) Secondly, the same drone evasion system will be able to control the launch of interceptors! At one time, I proposed equipping the "Geran" with anti-radar drones placed under the wing ...
    1. +3
      11 September 2025 07: 37
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      At one time, I suggested equipping the Geraniums with anti-radar drones placed under the wing...
      Can you imagine what kind of monster a small, and even disposable, drone would turn into?
      1. -2
        11 September 2025 08: 14
        What does the monster have to do with it? If the "Geranium" carries a 90 kg warhead, then it is not that "small"! By reducing the warhead to 60-70 kg, you can add, for example, a couple of 10 kg drones... The main thing is to start! wink
        1. +2
          11 September 2025 12: 00
          Quote: Nikolaevich I
          By reducing the warhead to 60-70 kg, you can add, for example, a couple of 10 kg drones
          The anti-radar drones you offer under the wings of the main drone will be in constant scanning mode, which means loss One of the main advantages of drones is their relative invisibility.. Well, and some small things - cheapness and simplicity. And don't forget that a drone is a disposable product...
    2. 0
      16 December 2025 12: 56
      Active tank defense uses mortars, so why not make a miniature version?
  3. 0
    11 September 2025 07: 13
    For example, some important structure can be attacked by one kamikaze UAV of the Geran-2 type with an HE warhead, followed by a kamikaze UAV with an incendiary warhead flying into the already damaged building, which will cause a fire, and a UAV with a cluster warhead will destroy and damage equipment and manpower located nearby.
    At present, 90 kg cumulative-fragmentation-high-explosive-incendiary (KOFZ) warheads are used, which in the West are called multi-purpose! As for cluster warheads, there have been reports of cluster warheads for remote mining... It is possible that in the future there will be warheads equipped with FPV drones (or with AI), which will "seed" air defense position areas with "waiting" drones! When the radar is turned on or the first SAM is launched, such drones attack the radar (radio frequency guidance) or the launcher (infrared guidance)...
  4. +4
    11 September 2025 07: 19
    Wouldn't it be better to trade range for protection?

    Not only protection, but also noise reduction. The impeller - a ring channel around a multi-bladed propeller increases efficiency. Additional jet thrust is created. You just need to add blades, reduce the diameter and make the impeller scientifically. That is, range does not need to be exchanged for protection. On the contrary, we can achieve even greater range.
    1. +2
      11 September 2025 08: 08
      Quote: Stas157
      Impeller - an annular channel around a multi-bladed propeller increases efficiency
      It also increases drag, increases overall weight and reduces engine cooling...
      1. +2
        11 September 2025 08: 12
        Quote: Luminman
        It also increases drag, increases overall weight and reduces engine cooling...

        Still, it has more useful action. Carbon fiber binding slightly adds to the weight. The same applies to air resistance. The speeds of the geranium are not so high, the resistance on them will be less.
      2. 0
        11 September 2025 09: 20
        reduces engine cooling...

        Well, that's theoretical...
        practically, the rear pair of cylinders is cooled worse than the front...
        but this is within acceptable limits...
      3. +3
        11 September 2025 09: 47
        Quote: Luminman
        It also increases drag, increases overall weight and reduces engine cooling...

        1. increases by a couple of percent, but the thrust also increases.
        2. The difference of 200-300 grams does not matter.
        3. I don't see any effect on engine cooling at all. The propeller is a pusher, behind the engine.
      4. 0
        16 December 2025 12: 54
        It can also generate lift, depending on its design. If it has an aerodynamic profile. About 50 years ago, they were playing with turboprops...
    2. +1
      16 December 2025 12: 51
      Cooler fans use saber-shaped blades and are quiet. We should focus on industries that have made advances in low noise—submarine propulsion systems, like the Varshavyankas... I believe the latter have impeller-driven water jets.
  5. +2
    11 September 2025 08: 52
    Geraniums have another feature: an HD camera on the fuselage that monitors the rear hemisphere.
    If an interceptor drone approaches from behind, a signal is immediately sent to the control module, and Geranium performs an evasive maneuver.
  6. 0
    11 September 2025 09: 22
    If you are going to make a casing for the screw, then perhaps it should not be metal or in the shape of a diamond, so that the reflection is not horizontal.
    but in general, it was worth thinking about a radical change in the propulsion system. A pusher propeller is a simple and reliable means, but when limited power is required, a lot of other implementation options arise, which, for example, can multiply the survivability of the structure or its invisibility.
    Now Geranium can be heard from a couple of kilometers away, if you have binoculars, it is not difficult to detect it visually. But if it flies quietly, the effectiveness of air defense will drop significantly.
  7. +1
    11 September 2025 12: 26
    In light of the latest news about the "migration" of our UAVs to Poland, I thought - if the enemy filters out false targets from combat ones by spoofing, and primarily spends air defense resources on targets that do not respond to spoofing, then it makes sense to pretend to be a "decoy" for some period of time, following the instructions of the enemy's electronic warfare, and then turn back to the target, having passed the main air defense lines. How to technically implement this - that is the question, but it is, I think, solvable ..
    1. 0
      11 September 2025 17: 09
      Geraniums don't fly straight anyway, forcing it to turn around and hit where it needs to is a solved problem. Making a false target with some kind of warhead so that it can then hit a secondary target just in case is not a difficult task.
      if the enemy filters out false targets from combat ones by spoofing
      well or combat targets do not fly further than Ukraine, because they have a target. And a false target has no target, only a path winked
      1. 0
        11 September 2025 18: 38
        Quote from alexoff
        And a false goal has no goal, only a path winked

        The Dao of UAVs is cool ) I meant the ability for Geranium to falsely react to spoofing. I suspect that it is not the same, and it is impossible to plan a "pretend" deviation into the route in advance. Perhaps, false targets are not equipped with warheads due to their small range resource, which is seriously eaten up by the extra load.
  8. +2
    11 September 2025 12: 31
    when the Russian Federation has an analogue of Starlink, then Geraniums will become very powerful VFP drones. Really, such a one will be able to fly through the window wherever it is needed.
    Well, there is room for development in terms of warhead equipment, all sorts of variations can be made
  9. +1
    11 September 2025 13: 35
    Amazing nonsense in places! Installing an air-to-air missile, even based on a MANPADS, is a multiple increase in cost, with minimal efficiency! Installing a fenestron is logical, considering that it will reduce thermal, radar and even acoustic signature.
    1. +1
      11 September 2025 17: 11
      Installing an air-to-air missile, even based on a MANPADS, would increase the cost several times over
      but if one such geranium out of a hundred shoots down an enemy fighter, then the whole undertaking will pay off. True, someone will have to think hard...
  10. +1
    11 September 2025 14: 14
    The use of Gerani as a frontline FPV against strongpoints and other important targets with a 100 kg warhead is also being discussed.
  11. +1
    4 October 2025 19: 44
    An example of a successful and correct choice of new military equipment. Or ammunition. Now we need mass production and cost reduction.
  12. 0
    28 November 2025 08: 54
    Evolution of Geranium: Stronger, Smarter, More Resilient
    .
    The larger and more powerful the Geranium, the easier it is to shoot down. The more expensive and fewer in number it is, the weaker the results of using powerful and capable UAVs.
    .
    Powerful and powerful geraniums can only be used during massive strikes, when the first waves destroy the air defenses, and subsequent waves strike the targets. However, destroying the air defenses requires control and adjustment with precision down to the meter, which we lack.
    .
    Meanwhile, doubling the accuracy reduces the warhead weight requirements by a factor of eight. Therefore, it's necessary to invest less in external power and more in communications and correction systems. Then, a precise strike from a kilogram-sized warhead will be more effective than detonating a hundredweight of explosives "somewhere nearby."
    I will not publish specific solutions here.
    However, in the future, direct strikes will be carried out not only by jet-powered monsters, but also by tiny "hummingbirds" the size of a soccer ball and weighing a couple of kilograms or less. It's important for the brass to stop obsessing over the looks of our UAVs and start giving the right instructions to the designers.
    1. -1
      28 November 2025 09: 20
      Quote: also a doctor
      Meanwhile, doubling the accuracy of the hit reduces the requirements for the warhead weight by 8 times.

      So, twice or eight times? It can be simpler: a cubic relationship, i.e., you're right: 2 to the third power is 8.
  13. 0
    16 December 2025 13: 06
    The Geranium, in my opinion, is an effective flying platform by many standards. And specialized "fittings" can be used for bombing, kamikaze, attack, anti-ship, and fighter support... Like the MiG-31 interceptor, it's practically been turned into a strategic bomber. Well, of course, algorithms and sensors... The navy's anti-submarine warfare skills. And the defense ideology should be taken from where the results are most advanced: armored vehicles, where the confrontation is most intense.