XCB-01 infantry fighting vehicle for the Vietnamese army

8 259 21
XCB-01 infantry fighting vehicle for the Vietnamese army
XCB-01 IFV on parade on September 2, 2025. Photo: Reuters


Vietnam strives to independently maintain the combat readiness of its armed forces, for which it develops and produces various models weapons and equipment. One of the latest examples of this approach is the XCB-01 infantry fighting vehicle. It was developed several years ago on the basis of the old Soviet BMP-1, taking into account modern threats and the needs of the army.



Deep upgrade


Currently, the Vietnam People's Army (VPA) infantry units have about 300 BMP-1 and BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles. This equipment was sent by the USSR before its collapse - and by now its age and condition leave much to be desired. In the future, the Vietnamese ground forces will need a major re-equipment.

The first steps in this direction were taken in 2022. At the beginning of the year, the Ministry of Defense launched the development of a new IFV, the design of which will take into account the experience of operating old equipment, modern threats, as well as the state and capabilities of the Vietnamese industry. In essence, it was a modernization of the existing BMP-1. The project was designated XCB-01 (Xe Chiến đấu Bộ binh-01 - "Infantry Fighting Vehicle-01").

The overall management of the project was assigned to the Main Directorate of Defense Industry. The lead developer and contractor was the Z189 shipyard (Haiphong). In addition, a number of other organizations were involved in the work, which were to make various components. Purchases of units abroad were planned.

According to known data, the development of the XCB-01 project and the construction of the first prototype (or prototypes) took only a few months. The prototype was launched for testing in the fall of 2022. The rapid development was facilitated by a certain simplicity of the project, the rejection of significant innovations and the availability of all the necessary technologies and components.


General view of the XCB-01. Photo Wikimedia Commons

Testing and demonstration


In November 2022, the experimental XCB-01 IFV arrived at one of the VNA training centers. The new vehicle was demonstrated to the command and personnel who would operate it in the future. Apparently, preparations for the start of testing were underway at the same time.

It soon became known that the XCB-01 had entered the testing grounds and was demonstrating its performance. It is likely that the armament and other onboard systems were also tested. Photos from the water tests were also made publicly available. Finally, in December 2023, the prototype was involved in full-scale army exercises.

Last December, the international military-technical exhibition Vietnam Defence Expo 2024 was held in Hanoi. At this event, the General Directorate of Defence Industry officially presented a new domestically developed IFV. The main characteristics and design features were revealed.

Following the tests, the XCB-01 was recommended for adoption. Also, serial production was launched at the Z189 plant. By now, the VNA should have received the first batches of equipment. At the same time, the army's needs for such IFVs and possible production rates, for obvious reasons, are not disclosed.

On September 2, a military parade dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the country's independence was held in the Vietnamese capital. As part of this event, the VNA displayed all the main types of weapons and equipment available in service. In particular, the mechanized column included infantry armored vehicles of the main types, both the old BMP-1 and the new XCB-01. Four new-type BMPs were shown at the parade.


An experimental IFV during exercises in 2023. Photo by Baochinhphu.vn

Technical features


In terms of design, the XCB-01 is a deep modernization of the BMP-1. Taking into account the new requirements and needs of the customer, the hull design was changed, the power plant was rebuilt, the weapons system was updated and other adjustments were made. At the same time, the main technical and layout solutions have not changed.

The hull was redesigned to increase the internal volume. The upper part of its sides became 150 mm higher. The nose and roof were also redesigned. The hull received new side screens of increased volume. Despite the changes, the level of protection of such a hull remained the same. The frontal projection withstands armor-piercing 12,7 mm bullets, and the rest of the armor protects against 7,62 mm rifle bullets.

The XCB-01 has received optical-electronic countermeasures. There are several laser irradiation sensors on the roof of the hull and on the rear of the turret, providing all-round visibility. When a laser beam is detected, a smoke grenade is automatically fired in the desired direction.

Due to the change in the hull, the overall length of the IFV increased to 6,95 m, the width - to 3,25 m. The height of the vehicle (excluding weapons on the turret) is 2,15 m. The combat weight is declared at 14,6 tons.

The experimental IFV was equipped with a South Korean-made Doosan DL08 diesel engine. The 340 hp diesel engine was able to fit into the existing engine compartment of increased height. However, later it was decided to return to the time-tested UTD-20 engine. It was supplemented with a turbocharger, which allowed increasing the power to 338 hp. The transmission and chassis were taken from the BMP-1 without significant changes.


Troop compartment. Photo Wikimedia Commons

Both new engines compensated for the increase in weight and allowed maintaining the specific power at the level of the base IFV. The running characteristics also remained virtually unchanged. The XCB-01 is capable of moving on the highway at a speed of up to 65 km/h and swimming at a speed of up to 7 km/h. The cruising range is 500 km.

The XCB-01 IFV received a new fighting compartment. A faceted turret cap was developed for it. In the center of the forehead there is an embrasure with the main armament. On a common swinging mount there is a 73-mm HT-73-01 cannon (a copy of the Soviet 2A28 Grom), a twin PKT machine gun and a launcher for missiles 9M14 "Malyutka". On the sides of the installation are four-barreled blocks of "Tucha" smoke grenade launchers.

For fire control and aiming, a combined sight 1PN22VN1 is used, also based on a Soviet product. It has a day channel, a night vision device, an infrared channel and a laser rangefinder. The ability to detect targets at any time of day and in any weather conditions at a distance of at least 2 km is declared.

In the central part of the turret roof there is a pedestal mount for a large-caliber NSV machine gun. This weapon is proposed to be used as an anti-aircraft weapon. It is controlled by one of the crew members standing in the hatch.

The crew of the Vietnamese IFV consists of three people - a commander, a gunner-operator and a driver. The troop compartment holds eight soldiers. They are located on longitudinal seats facing the sides. The side embrasures of the BMP-1 have been retained. The set of hatches in the roof and rear doors has remained the same.


XCB-01 next to BMP-1. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Limited revision


The Vietnamese defense industry cannot independently develop and produce modern armored vehicles. For objective reasons, it can only repair, modernize and rebuild existing products. In fact, this is how the XCB-01 project came about.

As part of its project, the Vietnamese industry made limited changes to the original design, but due to this, it achieved significant results. Thus, it was possible to improve the hull layout and ergonomics of the habitable compartments. The required running and dynamic characteristics were also preserved. Without changing the armor, they improved the level of protection using a radiation detection system and smoke grenade launchers.

The modification of the armament complex is of interest. The XCB-01 received a new turret cap and, probably, modified internal units. At the same time, the composition of the armament on the oscillating mount has not changed. Apparently, the VNA does not consider the 73-mm Grom cannon obsolete and is going to continue to use it. The overall fire characteristics have been improved by replacing the sighting devices. In addition, the previously available armament has been supplemented with an anti-aircraft large-caliber machine gun.

As a result of such changes, some fire characteristics should improve. First of all, this is the accuracy of fire and the ability to recognize and destroy targets in difficult conditions. The NSV anti-aircraft machine gun should increase the overall firepower. In addition, it can compensate for the insufficient elevation angles of the main mount - the BMP gets the ability to fire at air targets.

Park renewal


Thus, the Vietnamese XCB-01 IFV differs from the Soviet model by a number of minor changes, and also has similar characteristics and combat potential. However, several interesting and useful ideas have been proposed and implemented. In addition, the XCB-01 is being built right now and has a zero service life.

By producing new infantry fighting vehicles, the VPA will be able to modernize its fleet and extend the service life of the equipment. In addition, the army will receive some new combat capabilities. How long it will have to use the XCB-01, and whether it will be possible to replace them with fundamentally new equipment, is still unknown. In the meantime, the main task of the Vietnamese industry is the production of IFVs of its own design.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    10 September 2025 07: 20
    1. Without a full-fledged "barbecue" - no good.
    2. Necessity is the mother of invention.
    1. -1
      10 September 2025 09: 33
      there is a solution for the poor
      if you add a robotic machine gun mount (DPU) from the T-14
      and a 12mm shotgun with a belt - then even the BMP-1 will be more survivable from FPV drones
      than the T-90M3 with DZ and the T-14 with EDZ and APS
      1. +2
        10 September 2025 10: 09
        and a 12mm shotgun with a belt

        What kind of shotgun is this?
        1. 0
          10 September 2025 10: 15
          as an option Vepr-12 / VPO-205-00 SP, automation from RPK, belt feed like roller feed Scorpion to PKM - I think Tula has some developments or they will quickly come up with something
          1. +1
            10 September 2025 10: 16
            as an option Vepr-12

            so this is a 12 gauge shotgun...
            the barrel diameter there is almost 20 mm
            1. 0
              10 September 2025 10: 23
              I agree, the 18,5mm caliber for existing cartridges is just right
              a new line is being produced with a grouping at a range of 25, 50, 75 and 100 meters
              1. -3
                10 September 2025 22: 03
                A pointless set of inventions! The concept of Modern Combat? The place and role of IFVs in the Security Council? The General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation does not have such concepts. But they should. How to formulate the performance characteristics of a modern IFV in this case? I wonder if anyone in the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation has any idea about Modern Warfare? Judging by the SVO, NOT THE SLIGHTEST!
  2. +4
    10 September 2025 08: 28
    The armament remains old and outdated. It is unclear why the hull height was increased: did they make a multi-layer bottom to enhance mine protection or simply increase the height for convenience. There is nothing to be gained from this design; it will not become a modern IFV anyway.
    1. 0
      10 September 2025 22: 14
      increased the height for convenience

      Well, that's certainly unlikely. I don't think the Vietnamese are in such dire need of the troop compartment height.
      There is nothing to be gained from this design, it will not become a modern infantry fighting vehicle anyway

      Why? All modern IFVs look roughly like this. The combat module should be more up-to-date; in the troop compartment, the fuel tank should be placed on the floor or under the combat module, if it is without a turret basket, in the floor, and the seats should be along the sides for more space; the engine model should be modern, the same engine from Berezhok; if desired, after the power plant, add armor plates to the hull; you can even replace the chassis with a suspension with higher characteristics and wider rollers and tracks.
      But in general, everything that makes sense to change to BMP-1/2 is changed, so we get BMP-1AM and BMP-2M
  3. +4
    10 September 2025 08: 42
    As I understand it, in essence, we are talking about full-scale production of new units according to the modernized BMP-1 project. Interestingly, this contradicts the assertion of one tank blogger that the BMP-1/2 are not so easy to produce and in fact the same DPRK was unable to master them. And here comes some Vietnam and here you go.

    There is not much to say about the product itself. I will note a more competent distribution of smoke grenades than on domestic armored vehicles and a controversial decision to keep the 73 mm gun (although it is possible that it is the only one that is mass-produced), as well as side embrasures. Again, it is not clear why, if they decided to increase the hull (apparently even small Vietnamese found it cramped inside), then why not do other work on the errors: remove the tanks from the troop compartment, turn the seats with their backs to the hull walls, build up the lower side walls themselves to the ceiling so as to isolate the fenders and form niches for fuel tanks in them. In principle, the modernization option I described would not be bad to do on ordinary IFVs - there are few alterations, and they significantly improve the living conditions of the landing force, especially since after hanging the side screens, the use of embrasures becomes impossible, which means there is no need to place the landing force with their backs to each other (facing the sides). By the way, I noticed that the Vietnamese did not make a narrowing towards the stern of the hull in the area of ​​the troop compartment as on a regular BMP, where such a slope is intended to increase the sector of fire from the embrasures not only to the side, but also a little forward. In general, as an attempt by a small but proud country - it is quite worthy of attention, but there is something else to think about.
    1. +2
      10 September 2025 12: 08
      Quote: Dante
      the controversial decision to retain the 73mm cannon (although it is possible that it is the only one that is being mass-produced), as well as the side embrasures.

      This and everything else that seems controversial to us, perhaps because we are not aware of the use of technology in Vietnam, where the natural conditions are more suitable for "guerrilla" warfare. We modernized it for ourselves, it's like a "merkava" for Israeli conditions.
      1. +1
        10 September 2025 22: 26
        there the natural conditions are more suitable for a kind of "guerrilla" war

        What makes the Grom so good in "guerrilla" warfare, unlike the 2A42?
        it's like a merkava for israeli conditions

        It's just a laugh.
        Please name those very specific conditions of the Israeli theater of operations that are not found anywhere else on the planet and, accordingly, the technical solutions of the Merkava that are no longer suitable for other conditions.
      2. -3
        11 September 2025 21: 59
        So what about guerrilla warfare and the unique conditions of Israel?)
        1. +2
          12 September 2025 09: 58
          I don't like to have dialogues with people whose goal is to twist everything I'm supposed to under their exclusivity. About the Merkava sharpened for their theater of operations and needs. You can read without me, the Internet is big. As for the rest, it's written
          what we I am not aware of the use of technology in Vietnam, there the natural conditions are more suitable for a kind of "guerrilla" war.
          Well, the capabilities of the military-industrial complex should be taken into account, they decided that Grom was enough for their conditions
          1. -1
            12 September 2025 20: 34
            You can read without me, the internet is big

            I read it.
            I didn't hear anything intelligible.
            I was hoping that you would finally tell me what is so incredible about Israel that it is necessary to make some kind of specific tank.
            That's why Japan and Korea are mountainous countries and accordingly they made adjustable suspension and saved on armor weight as much as they could on their tanks, I know. But I don't understand what is so specific about the Merkava.
            But you probably know.
            decided that Thunder was enough for their conditions

            So I ask, why did you assume that the conditions of the Southeast Asian theater of operations somehow contribute to the revelation of Thunder from an unexpected side?
            Dense tropical forests? Marshy soils? Mountains?
            Apparently, judging by the appearance of the "new" BMP-1, this is not a modernization, but a major overhaul with minor adjustments. They simply decided not to spend money on rearming the vehicle.
            The jungles of Vietnam have nothing to do with it.
  4. -4
    10 September 2025 08: 53
    There is no point in modernizing a 60-year-old museum exhibit. The costs will be exactly the same as building a new modern car.
    1. 0
      10 September 2025 10: 10
      a new modern IFV can cost at the same level as an MBT, or even more than an MBT, the latest modifications of the Swedish Sea-90 cost 9 million euros with a 35mm Bush Master and it seems there is an ATGM system
  5. +1
    10 September 2025 10: 09
    Well, I don't know, the tower had to be changed too.
  6. -1
    10 September 2025 13: 25
    Somehow this is not a modernization, but rather a major overhaul with some extras. A Beha, like a Beha. And even with Thunder.
  7. 0
    10 September 2025 19: 55
    The upper part of its sides became 150 mm higher.
    There! Even short Vietnamese feel cramped there, and then we wonder, "Why are they all riding on armor?!"
    1. The comment was deleted.
  8. 0
    12 November 2025 11: 52
    Why not just buy BMP-3s from Russia? At least in small quantities? Vietnam has the money. In any case, this vehicle is significantly better than the HSV-01. They could even buy BMP-2s. But they know better.