Do we need Su-57 in factories in India?

32 504 153
Do we need Su-57 in factories in India?

It has already been said about Putin's "limousine diplomacy", which is bearing certain fruit, and now there is a new confirmation of its effectiveness. After Vladimir Vladimirovich and Narendra Damodardas rode in Putin's limousine and then talked, very interesting movements began.

We've used up more than one gigabyte of information space discussing Indian dances around airplanes. And, frankly, we even rubbed our hands over the idea that the Rafales would still show themselves on the "good" side.




Yes, we didn’t have to wait long, Pakistani MiG-21s, to which China attached new noses and replaced avionics, were also delivered by Chinese rockets "Rafali" was completely dismantled. Yes, the Indians did not admit anything directly, but the list of posthumously awarded military pilots was more than proof.


And so, after Putin and Modi had their secret conversation, Rosoboronexport immediately received a request. India asks to calculate no more and no less than the volume of investment needed to set up production of... Su-57 at a plant in the state of Maharashtra.

Well, are we flying? I mean, to history, as usual?

There was a project called FGFA. Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft. In essence, it was a repeat of the Su-30MKI story, that is, the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) and the Indian company Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) signed an agreement on the joint development and production of a fifth-generation fighter.


Both sides take on part of the work and, accordingly, the financing. That is, what they cannot pay for in India, they pay for in Russia. This is how the crazy fleet Indian Air Force with 250+ Su-30MKI.

Yes, the Indians have assembled more Su-30s than we have, including export deliveries. That says something.

It was assumed that HAL's share in the joint project would be at least 25%. The total cost of the project was estimated at 8-10 billion dollars. And even then there was a clause in the agreement according to which India could supply aircraft assembled locally to other countries.

At the end of April 2018, India withdrew from the FGFA project. Indian capricious military began to literally whine about how invisibility is not so invisible, and radars do not detect radar, and in general everything is bad and this is not the fifth generation.

In the end, they bought the Rafale, which was a cut above the Su-57. Otherwise, what was the point of buying it? Yes, it’s true, the bonus was that for the price of one Rafale you could buy two Su-35s, and a Chinese-made MiG-21, and even a dozen, but that’s another story.

And now, back to the future. India wants Russia to consider producing 60 Su-57s for its air force, with the planes then being exported.

For export... That is, Russia will apparently make money on this, but... And anyway, do we really need it? India seems to be making quite a good profit today on Russian oil, selling gasoline made from it to the whole world. And then there are airplanes. Isn't that too much?

You have to think. And when you think, you have to evaluate your own capabilities.

In general, Russia has been removed from the arms market, let's be honest. And only very serious guys who simply cannot afford anything else, because they are completely accustomed to Soviet/Russian, can buy our planes. Such as Algeria, China and, yes, India. Who are not very afraid of threats from the US.

But here the question arises: will we be able to fulfill contracts for the supply of aircraft to other countries?

In general, the capabilities of Russian aircraft manufacturing are not very great:
- Irkutsk aviation the plant that produces the Su-30. And to it the Yak-130, Yak-152, MS-21.
- Novosibirsk Aviation Institute named after V.P. Chkalov, which produces the Su-34.
- Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aviation Plant named after Yuri Gagarin, produces Su-35 and Su-57.

And that's it. There are no reserves.

Previously, there were no particular problems, but previously there was no SVO and the losses associated with it. And these are not only losses from enemy SAMs, but also resource losses. An aircraft, especially a combat aircraft, is not eternal at all. Therefore, the resource spent in battles has to be compensated for by new aircraft.

If the planes were as simple as they were during the Great Patriotic War, there would be no talk, but in our time everything is somewhat more complicated. And from here it is clear why the Su-57 is frankly stuck in terms of the production of that series of 76 planes: KnAAPO is busy producing the Su-35, which is actually dragging the entire war in the air.


In the end, it is not the 35th's fault that it turned out to be such a wonderful aircraft that it performs several roles at once: an escort fighter, a headache for radar and air defense systems, an AWACS aircraft, and so on. Accordingly, it flies like no other. Hence the losses, hence the wear and tear, hence the need for replacement.

In general, not up to the 57th, which also showed itself well, but the 35th is already mastered and tested weapon, and the Su-57 needs to be honed and brought to perfection.

And here the production of Su-57 somewhere else does not look so stupid. After all, we used Iranian Drones, Korean shells and so on? Why not use planes?

HAL is a strong company. It has 16 factories, in addition to the mega-giant in Bangalore, where they produce not only the Su-30, but also many other things, from engines and avionics to missiles. And India can be looked at as a testing ground, and perhaps even counted on.


Demographically, India is in a much better position than China. According to the IMF, India's population of 1,42 billion is larger than China's 1,4 billion. OK, even if they are equal, India's population is young. The Pew Research Center puts the median age in India at 28, while in China it is 39.

And China already has its own well-established technologies that allow China to do much more in the aviation sector than India. That is, we can simply use India the way the whole world used China in its time – space with a huge amount of labor force. Something that we do not have and will not appear even at the behest of a magic wand.

So turning to India is not so bad in reality. They can actually make planes for Russia there, why not? Poor quality? Well, the Indians somehow fight on T-90 and Su-30MKIs assembled by themselves, and it should be noted that the T-90 is much more reliable and effective than that ill-fated Arjun, which is generally only good for parades. And the Su-30 is, unlike the "under-mirage" Tejas, a combat aircraft capable of smashing anyone's face.


Of course, our own is, yes, but Russian is better. At least, this postulate is valid for India. But if it is the other way around, yes, after all, Russia has saddled the Chinese auto industry, and nothing...

In general, if you believe Asian News International, and this is one of the largest news agencies in Asia, then:

"Russia is studying the possibilities and volume of investments required to manufacture its fifth-generation Su-57 fighters in India at the request of the Indian side. For the possible production of Russian "stealth" aircraft, it is planned to use the facilities of the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited aviation center in the city of Nashik, Maharashtra, previously occupied by the assembly of Russian-Indian Su-30MKI fighters. A contract for the purchase of Su-57 may be concluded during the next Russian-Indian summit at the highest level."

The likelihood of such a deal being concluded is very high. According to ANI experts, India will need about 65-70 fifth-generation aircraft until the local AMCA fifth-generation project gets off the ground. If it gets off the ground, of course. That is very much in question.

At the same time, the Indians expect that they will be able to produce the Su-57ME not only for their own needs, but also for export. And there is a reason for this: having established the production of the BrahMos cruise missiles, they began to sell them to the entire district, and since the missile is really very good, Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam bought the Yakhonts. Now even Saudi Arabia is considering the possibility of acquiring the BrahMos. One can only regret that they buy the BrahMos from India and not the Yakhont from Russia.


It is therefore understandable that India is counting on repeating its success with the Su-57, since France has issued a complete refusal to produce the Rafale.

In general, there are quite a few countries in the world that are ready to spend money on modern technology, especially airplanes. An airplane is a very complex thing, and not every country can set up their production.

And, as was said above, not every country can buy aircraft from Russia, fearing sanctions from the US. So it can be said that Russia and India have mutual interest. Naturally, the sale of licensed Su-57s manufactured in India will bring Russia a certain profit, but, of course, not as much as the sale of aircraft made in Russia.

Of course, there is no need to dance for joy, even the signing of official interstate contracts between Russia and India is not a guarantee that everything will go as it should. Deals with India are a very delicate matter, and Delhi can dance back any initiative. So unforeseen problems are normal in India.

On the other hand, if everything goes as planned, Russia could get an additional influx of new aircraft, which would have a really positive effect on the state of the Aerospace Forces. Even if these aircraft are assembled in India.


Another question is that it will be a slightly different Su-57, which is assembled in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, and that is a fact. But it is not a fact that this aircraft will be worse than ours, there is no certainty here, because India has its own vision regarding the use of this aircraft.

First, the plane must be a two-seater.


A weapons operator is sacred to Indians. And it should be noted that a modern complex battle really poses such challenges for the crew of any aircraft that two people in the crew is not so bad. Yes, it requires certain work in terms of life support systems, but it is worth it.

Secondly, India wants to use the new aircraft not as a fighter, but as a multi-role aircraft. That is, a fighter, interceptor, bomber, missile carrier. The latter is especially interesting, since the Indian Air Force already has the air-launched BrahMos-mini and is working hard on the BrahMos-2, which should become hypersonic.


And there is confidence that it will, since the designers of NPO Mashinostroeniya from Reutov play the leading role in the work on the rocket. And they know how to do it.

In addition, all Indian missile developments must be added to the Su-57’s “skills.”


Their third-generation Astra has already attracted some interest in the world, so if the missile goes into production, it will be interesting: Astra Mk3, according to Indian sources, will have an impressive range of 320-350 km, and it is already being compared with AMRAAM and Meteor, but when it flies, then we will talk. For now, the missile is in the testing stage.

Thirdly. Even during the joint work, the Indian side put forward a lot of claims in terms of avionics. So the Su-57I (Indian) will have to replace the N036 "Belka" with something Indian. Judging by what they write there, the Indian radar based on gallium nitride (GaN) is better in all respects than the Russian one, based on gallium arsenide (GaAs). The Indian radar, according to that side, is more accurate, sees further, and dances well.

There are, of course, a lot of doubts here, because India has never been listed among the developers of the latest radio-electronic equipment, but nothing can be done about it. Although they have the right to their own. Although, of course, the pairing of an Indian radar with Russian filling is a promising entertainment for engineers. And here there may be nuances of various kinds, up to the impossibility of technical solutions.

However, everything is transparent here: having almost completely failed their own "AMS" program and found themselves under the axe of their own "Self-sufficient India" program, the Indian military is trying to solve all their problems in aviation at the expense of the Russian base. Perhaps it will work, perhaps not.

The question is how interesting all this is for Russia. At first glance, not very much, but if you use the Indian base for partial production of aircraft for your own needs, you can endure it.
153 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +51
    11 September 2025 04: 16
    India is an unreliable and multi-vector partner in the creation of modern weapons. Nothing good will come out of the joint production of Su-57. For us.
    1. +4
      11 September 2025 04: 33
      Quote: Bearded
      Nothing good will come out of the joint production of the Su-57.

      It's very easy!
      1. +1
        11 September 2025 16: 45
        The problem is that "effective managers" don't even know how to advertise their equipment. The Su-57E is a godsend for the Indian Air Force. Where will they buy a 5th or 4th generation aircraft that they will be allowed to produce at their factories? Moreover, they will be able to install their own equipment on it if they wish. The Su-57 has an excellent airframe and engines, some aircraft systems, some instrumentation systems. The Indians are getting a basic aircraft with the ability to install their own advanced equipment on it, if it exists or will be. They should have been "crawling on their knees" for several years now and begging to sell it. What diplomacy? A version with two crew members is even preferable to a single-seat aircraft. Both from the point of view of training and as a basis for creating a 6th generation aircraft...
      2. +1
        12 September 2025 16: 25
        Maybe it will work out if 2-3 dozen corrupt officials shoot. Otherwise, this gang will dance away everything.
    2. -14
      11 September 2025 05: 28
      Please list what you see as negative for Russia in this?
      1. +31
        11 September 2025 05: 53
        almost everything is good))) the newest plane will be immediately received for study by both the US and China and in general whoever will flip the pie and the fact that India will also sell it as their own is some kind of cuckooing laughing
        1. +5
          11 September 2025 08: 18
          Let's start with the fact that both the US and China already have 5th generation aircraft, they will soon show the 6th in the foreseeable future, and who said that the Su-57E will be 100 percent produced in India? They will most likely either install their own avionics or buy them from others if they refuse ours, and they will 100 percent buy our engine, it is impractical to remake anything else, they cannot make their own. And who to sell to? India generally supplies weapons only to small change and only to all sorts of Kenya and Nigeria and Botswana and Suriname, the most technologically advanced are light helicopters from HAL, re-export can be prohibited from reselling without consent and a share to our military-industrial complex
          1. 0
            11 September 2025 08: 40
            And who to sell to? India generally supplies only small arms and then only to Kenya and Nigeria and Botswana and Suriname,

            And when the SU-57 appears in the sky over the country, but not from our side, what do you say?
            1. +5
              11 September 2025 10: 04
              and since Hochland doesn't have an Indian-assembled Su-30, there won't be any Su-57 either
              F-35s will be there first
            2. +1
              12 September 2025 10: 53
              Quote: private person
              And when the SU-57 appears in the sky over the country, but not from our side, what do you say?

              Never, that's a fact. The Ukraine will not survive that long.
          2. +6
            11 September 2025 13: 55
            The Americans did not sell the F-22 to any of their allies. The F-35 program was initially launched as an international one.
        2. IVZ
          -1
          11 September 2025 10: 03
          The newest aircraft will be immediately received for study by both the US and China
          To find a product for study, it is not necessary to purchase it from the manufacturer; it can be purchased from any operator.
        3. 0
          11 September 2025 11: 29
          All of those you listed already have 5th generation machines, well, or almost have them. And the reverse engineering method does not always work. If you do not betray some critical technologies to the Indians, leave their production at home and sell the finished product, then there will be no leaks. The Chinese were sold the S-300 in 1992, and something similar, made in China, appeared in the mid-00s, when the S-400 was already on the way. And China is head and shoulders above the Indians in terms of copying.
        4. +13
          11 September 2025 12: 36
          Quote from Mazunga
          This is some kind of cuckolding

          This whole article is pure cuckooing.
          India will not sell Su-57, they need 300 of these planes for their Air Force. And no less. Because China is already seriously over a hundred J-20s alone, after all, the J-35 has already entered the army, and not only in carrier-based aviation. And Pakistan has already ordered several dozen J-35s. So India has no time for trade now, they need to saturate their Air Force as quickly as possible. And it will take them about 15 years. So we can sleep peacefully.
          The fact that we will also buy our own planes from the Indians was especially funny. From our own kits! Indian assembly!
          We have THREE assembly lines built for the production of Su-57. Each for 30 aircraft per year. The first has already reached full production capacity this year, the second is producing the first 1 Su-2s for Algeria this year. The third is currently finishing assembly and will most likely produce two-seater Su-6s. There will be a fourth assembly line for India - for assembling our machine kits.
          UAC and Rostec already have several contracts for the delivery of Su-57, the first 6 units are already being sent to Algeria this year (as well as 6 Su-34E and 6 Su-35SE), next year the same number will be sent there, 12 units have been ordered so far.
          But for India the order is big - about 300 units. With a license for assembly from our machine kits. The cost of the machine kit and the license (for 1 aircraft) is approximately equal to the cost of buying a ready-made aircraft from us. And with the Indian hassle of their own assembly, even with the Su-30MKI it turned out to be 2 times more expensive (100 million dollars instead of 50 million), so this method of sale is much more profitable for us - the same money for one machine kit and a license + the cost of the assembly line and everything due under the contract, including simulators and spare parts, as well as ASP. Minimum hassle, our lines not loaded with this order and the same money. There is no need to be afraid of competition even in the future - the Indians will have aircraft assembled by them 1,5-2 times more expensive. Always. And they will have to work non-stop for 15 years to provide for their Air Force.
          And they are also waiting for the Su-75, they are interested.
          And the Americans were sent with Lightning.
          The French would have been sent too, but their aircraft carrier Vikrant was built specifically for the Rafale. But everyone involved in the previous contracts with the French are already sitting - in prison or under investigation.
          That's why we dragged the Su-57 to exhibitions, that's why contracts are now being collected - production capacities have already been created and are being launched and they need to be recouped as quickly as possible. Soon at least 50% of the Su-57 will be exported.
          By December 31, we will have 74 operational Su-57s (three regimental sets) in service. By the end of the future, it will already exceed a hundred. The military aircraft industry has started working.
          1. +1
            11 September 2025 17: 04
            Can you tell me where I got the drivers for the 4th line? If I remember correctly, the 3rd line was installed just under the FGFA.
            It's also interesting about the 74 combat units we have. It's somehow fast, recently there were 30 pieces and then bam and twice as many.
            1. 0
              11 September 2025 20: 28
              Quote: bu9aga9
              Can you tell me where the firewood is from?

              What are you interested in?
              Quote: bu9aga9
              otherwise, if I remember correctly, the 3rd one was installed just under the FGFA.

              Our VKS also need two-seaters. And other clients and allies are no exception.
              4th in India for Indians. For assembly from kits like Su-30MKI.
              Quote: bu9aga9
              we have it somehow quickly, recently there were 30 pieces and then bam and 2 times more.

              And where is that for you? Because VKS has never had such a figure for the year.
              Last year, as of December 31, there were 44 units.
              In this case, 30 units are in the VKS and 6 units are for export.
          2. +2
            12 September 2025 12: 10
            Quote: bayard
            India will not sell Su-57, they need 300 of these planes for their Air Force. And no less.

            There is one more subtle point with India: when the order volume is large, they make it a mandatory requirement of the contract that most of the machines be manufactured directly in India. Otherwise, it will be like with the Rafales.

            The main problem will be different - Indian assembly and maintenance can lead to disasters that will undermine the reputation of the aircraft. There was already a precedent with the Su-30MKI of Indian assembly, after the disasters of which the Indians drove a wave against Sukhoi and Russia. But it turned out that it was the Indians themselves who were responsible... well, damn place ©:
            As is known, Defense Minister Manohar Parikkar reported that the Indian Su-30MKI fleet is experiencing major problems with the level of serviceable aircraft, primarily due to power plant failures.
            India operates a modification of the Su-30MKI, not very different from the Algerian version. At the same time, according to the Minister of Defense, the Indian Air Force already had five accidents and 69 incidents with AL-31FP engines manufactured by HAL since 2012. According to Parrikar, of these 69 incidents, 33 were caused by chips in the oil, 11 caused vibration in the engine, and eight were due to very low pressure in the oil supply. Accusations were made regarding the poor quality of the assembly, which quickly resulted in a fatigue effect that caused cracks, which led to the appearance of metal fragments and the oil circuit. The investigation also drew attention to the quality of the oil. By order of the Indian Ministry of Defense, measures have been taken: the use of better quality oil, the alteration and replacement of welding and mounting components between mechanical parts.
            © bmpd
            1. -1
              12 September 2025 12: 20
              Yes, I have heard of these stories. In principle, the French, before refusing to assemble Rafales under license in India, inspected the plant producing the Su-30MKI, were amazed and categorically refused. So the Indians always have a choice, but they WANT. And if they want to do it with their own money, then why not? The cost of the machine kit and the license is equal to the cost of the finished aircraft at the export price. No one will let them make engines, at least for the first 10 years. And the engines on their aircraft will be first-generation or, at best, "intermediate" (there are no others yet). And let them assemble them, it is even more profitable for us in terms of money and production capacity. But they will hardly be able to sell their own assembled aircraft.
        5. +1
          11 September 2025 16: 31
          the newest aircraft will be immediately received for study by both the US and China and generally whoever will flip through the pages
          Do you think that some Timur Ivanov didn’t get ahead of the Indians and sell the blueprints to the West? request
          1. 0
            11 September 2025 17: 06
            yes, maybe they didn't have time, there must be hope)))
      2. +13
        11 September 2025 06: 59
        Quote from iommy
        Please list what you see as negative for Russia in this?

        Technology leakage, including to the West, competition on the market from India, loss of money for our military-industrial complex, loss of high-tech jobs. That's enough.
        France refused to hand over ancient technologies to India. And we, like, are not like that and are ready to share the newest ones. fool
        1. +4
          11 September 2025 07: 48
          Yes, we didn’t have to wait long, Pakistani MiG-21s, to which China attached new noses and replaced the avionics, and Chinese missiles took the Rafales apart completely.

          And not only the Rafale, but in defense of our Su-30s I will say that the problem was not in the planes, but in the presence of the IRP Air Force online data transmission system "link-17" and more modern Chinese and Swedish AWACS.
          There are, of course, a lot of doubts here, because India has never been listed as a developer of the latest electronic equipment, but nothing can be done about it.

          Time does not stand still, Indians are the best programmers in the world and they have already improved electronics.
          The newest aircraft will be immediately received for study by both the US and China

          It's not that new anymore, 15 years have passed since its first takeoff. A new version or a new plane needs to be created.

          P.S. Elephants will dance and fray nerves to the point of exhaustion, trying to get a bribe and a discount.
          1. +4
            11 September 2025 09: 19
            Quote: Civil
            And not only the Rafale, but in defense of our Su-30s I will say that the problem was not in the planes, but in the presence of the IRP Air Force online data transmission system "link-17" and more modern Chinese and Swedish AWACS.

            The problem for the Indian Air Force is that the only aircraft in the Indian Air Force today capable of carrying truly long-range air-to-air missiles, the Meteor, which can compete in maximum launch range with the Chinese PL-15 air-to-air missiles, is equipped with a relatively weak radar.

            Maximum detection range of a fighter-type target (RCS 3 sq. m) of the RBE2-AA radar of the Rafale fighter is ~130 km:

            https://www.deagel.com/Components/RBE2/a001508#002

            The PL-15 missiles were launched by Pakistani J-10CE fighters from ranges of >140 km, when the Rafale fighters' radars had not yet "seen" the enemy.

            Maximum detection range of a fighter-type target (RCS 3 sq. m) by the KLJ-10 radar of the J-10C fighter is ~220 km:

            https://www.deagel.com/Components/KLJ-10/a004390

            And all the writings about Link-17 and about the fact that Swedish Saab 2000 AWACS aircraft with Erieye radar are supposedly better than Indian A-50I with Israeli Phalcon radar simply mask with "information noise" the fact that the radar of the Chinese J-10C fighter detects a "fighter" type target at a range of ~220 km, while the most modern radar of the French Rafale fighter only at a range of ~130 km.
            1. +3
              11 September 2025 12: 29
              And all the writings about Link-17 and about the fact that Swedish Saab 2000 AWACS aircraft with Erieye radar are supposedly better than Indian A-50I with Israeli Phalcon radar simply mask with "information noise" the fact that the radar of the Chinese J-10C fighter detects a "fighter" type target at a range of ~220 km, while the most modern radar of the French Rafale fighter only at a range of ~130 km.

              No, it's not. Link-17 integrates J-10CE, HQ-16 SAM, HQ-9 SAM, ZDK-03 "Karakoram Eagle" AWACS into a single network. Pakistani fighters did not turn on their radars, but only reached the attack line with PL-15. At this time, the Pak electronic warfare "killed" the Su-30 and Rafale radars. All this has already been described in a bunch of articles, including on VO.
              1. +1
                11 September 2025 13: 15
                Quote: Civil
                No, that's not true. Link-17 integrates the J-10CE, HQ-16 SAM, HQ-9 SAM, and ZDK-03 "Karakoram Eagle" AWACS into a single network.

                The Pakistan Air Force's ZDK-03 AWACS aircraft were decommissioned more than a year ago and are being upgraded into electronic warfare aircraft.

                https://www.thekhybermail.com/pakistan-upgrades-zdk-03-fleet-to-advanced-electronic-warfare-aircraft/

                What Link-17 integrates with what in the Pakistani Armed Forces is known only to those who still list the ZDK-03 as active AWACS aircraft of the Pakistani Air Force. But it is unlikely that Link-17 will integrate Swedish AWACS aircraft Saab 2000 and the latest modifications of the J-10CE and JF-17 Block III fighters of Chinese design into a single real-time information and telecommunications network.

                However, it is known that the AFAR radar of the newest modification of the Chinese J-10C (J-10CE) fighter detects a "fighter" type target at a distance of more than 200 km. While the RBE2-AA AFAR radar of the French Rafale fighter and the Bars PFAR radar of the Indian-assembled Su-30MKI fighter detect a similar target at a distance of 130-140 km:

                https://www.deagel.com/Components/KLJ-10/a004390
                https://www.deagel.com/Components/RBE2/a001508#002
                https://www.deagel.com/Components/Bars/a001866#001

                What are you arguing with me about now?

                Do you not agree that the detection range of a fighter-type target of more than 200 km is much greater than the detection range of a fighter-type target of 130-140 km?

                Or perhaps you disagree with the fact that in the air battle on May 7, 2025, Pakistani pilots launched missiles from ranges at which the radars of the Rafale and Su-30MKI fighters could not yet detect the enemy fighters?

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PL-15

                "An investigation by Reuters found that Indian intelligence had underestimated the range of the PL-15E. Pakistani officials said the PL-15 missile that hit the Rafale was fired from about 200 km (120 miles) away, while Indian officials said the missile was fired from even further away, making it one of the longest-range strikes in aviation history.[24]"

                Please clarify what you wanted to say with your "No, that's not it"?
                At this time, the electronic warfare packs were "clobbered" by the Su-30 and Rafale airborne missiles.

                What specific electronic warfare systems of the "packs" "clobbered" the Su-30MKI and Rafale radars if even in the absence of electronic warfare, the Su-30MKI and Rafale radars detect a "fighter" type target at distances of 130-140 km, and take it on track at even shorter distances?
                All this has already been described in a bunch of articles, including on VO.

                Everything that is written by authors who do not even know that the ZDK-03 aircraft at the time of the battle on May 7, 2025 were decommissioned from the Pakistani Air Force and were being converted into electronic warfare aircraft relates more to the fantasies of the authors of the "bunch of articles" than to the realities of the battle on May 7, 2025.
                1. +1
                  11 September 2025 14: 02
                  Do you not agree that the detection range of a fighter-type target of more than 200 km is much greater than the detection range of a fighter-type target of 130-140 km?

                  This has nothing to do with this battle. The "eyes" were not the J-10 radars, meaning the guidance was not done by the fighters themselves.
                  Or perhaps you disagree with the fact that in the air battle on May 7, 2025, Pakistani pilots launched missiles from ranges at which the radars of the Rafale and Su-30MKI fighters could not yet detect the enemy fighters?

                  Yes, but they were oriented towards the PL-15 range when launching. Guidance and tracking were provided by an integrated air defense system based on Link-17 communications. The communications system was made by the Chinese, I don't think it was difficult for them to integrate the Swedes. However, regarding the ZDK-03, no one knows for sure whether they were removed from combat duty or not, whether they were modernized or not.
                  1. 0
                    12 September 2025 10: 57
                    Quote: Civil
                    This has nothing to do with this battle. The "eyes" were not the J-10 radars, meaning the guidance was not done by the fighters themselves.

                    You simply accept the "technoromantic" fantasies of "analysts" who talk about the "network-centric" superiority of the Pakistani Armed Forces due to the targeting of enemy aircraft by Chinese PL-15 (PL-15E) missiles from a Swedish Saab 2000 AWACS aircraft via Link-17 or XS-3 (the dreamers have not yet agreed on this) real-time data transmission channels as fact.
                    The communication system was made by the Chinese, I don’t think it was difficult for them to integrate the Swedes.

                    The Data Distribution System (DDS) for the US Navy's Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) real-time data transmission system was developed by the Americans. However, why was the integration of the AN/USG-3B terminals of this system with the corresponding antenna equipment on board the E-2C AWACS aircraft difficult for them? Maybe there were problems with space on board, or electromagnetic compatibility, what do you think?
                    USNAVY E-2D Advanced Hawkeye(168991) of VAW-125 USG-3B CEC antenna (AS-4467) right rear low-angle view at MCAS Iwakuni May 5 2018:

                    Although perhaps my information is out of date and you will provide a photo of the AN/USG-3B terminal antennas on the E-2C aircraft of the US Navy?
                    However, regarding the ZDK-03, no one knows for sure whether they were removed from combat duty or not, whether they were modernized or not.

                    But everyone is happily fantasizing about a “network-centric” victory of the Pakistan Air Force, trivially ignoring the fact that the Pakistani military attributed all victories in the air battle on May 7, 2025 to J-10CE aircraft (for some reason not remembering the participation "Pakistani MiG-21s, which were given new noses and avionics in China", in the sense of the light JF-17 Block III fighters - also carriers of PL-15E missiles, albeit with weak radars), and that according to available information, the J-10CE radar has a detection range of more than 200 km for a fighter-type target.
          2. +3
            11 September 2025 11: 32
            As for the Indians being the best programmers in the world - it's debatable. As for Indian electronics too. The Chinese already have working schemes on gallium oxide, while the whole world, including India, is still using nitride.
            1. +7
              11 September 2025 11: 51
              Quote: TermNachTER
              It's debatable that Indians are the best programmers in the world.

              Chingachgook was the best programmer of all the Indians. laughing
              1. 0
                11 September 2025 12: 22
                I myself am just a PC user, not even an advanced one. I probably don't even know half of what my laptop can do. But my godfather is a programmer with over 30 years of practical programming. So, he considers the best to be the Chinese. The guys are disciplined, diligent, meticulous.
                Although, Valery is a friend who lives in the USA and works as a programmer. He told me that there are about 60 mugs working at the company, of which 3 are real programmers. He is Ukrainian, Chinese and Indian))) Americans, just "go, bring, serve")))
                1. +1
                  11 September 2025 13: 55
                  I myself am just a PC user, not even an advanced one.

                  That is, the welder is not actually real.
                  1. +2
                    11 September 2025 14: 06
                    Well, I can work with a welding machine, an electric arc one, although of course I am far from being a professional welder. And I don't need it, I can find people who can and know how.
              2. +1
                11 September 2025 12: 31
                Quote: Piramidon
                Quote: TermNachTER
                It's debatable that Indians are the best programmers in the world.

                Chingachgook was the best programmer of all the Indians. laughing

                Yes, he programmed in the Big Snake, that is, in Python. laughing
          3. +3
            11 September 2025 21: 33
            Quote: Civil
            Indians are the best programmers in the world
            ?
            I had the chance to work with them several times, and with the best of the best (the worse ones stay in India). They can quickly solve standard problems using standard methods, faster than most American programmers, including yours truly. But a slightly non-standard problem, and there are several of them in each project, they have a bottleneck. And for those who were sent projects to India (as always, the bosses bought into the promise of fast and cheap), I had to edit and rewrite good if only pieces, and sometimes entire projects.
        2. -8
          11 September 2025 09: 32
          Quote: Bearded
          Technology leakage, including to the West, competition in the market from India

          What technologies, Borodach, can you tell? wassat
        3. 0
          11 September 2025 11: 11
          Technology leakage, including to the West,

          A number of technologies and even finished products were provided by us long ago. And even China could not copy them. And India does not reach China in this regard.
          loss of money for our military-industrial complex

          At the moment, our military-industrial complex does not have the money and capacity to handle serial production. India's participation can solve this problem. The most important thing is that a market for many finished products will appear, which will simplify our task of serial production and make the design cheaper.
          loss of high-tech jobs.

          Such places will remain and even become more numerous. Again, due to the presence of a sales market and constant production of key components.
          That is enough.

          No, that's not enough. The contract with India saved UVZ from closing. There were localization conditions there too.
          France refused to hand over

          Find out what technologies exactly and based on what considerations.
          ready to share the latest.

          Check out what exactly we're sharing.
          This deal is not so clear-cut. I judge by the history with UVZ. This is not a simple plant for producing AKs in SA under license.
        4. KCA
          +3
          11 September 2025 11: 17
          China has bought and is buying a whole bunch of our engines, everything seems simple, take them apart down to the last screw and nut, make a copy, but no, the stone flower doesn't come out, it gets stuck in there, a piece of cake, turbine blades don't work, that's what the Russians pour and bake them from, the problem is number one, the Chinese ones are good for a couple of takeoffs, ours for thousands, and what's there, clay and temperature, it's a piece of cake, a chamber pot is no more difficult
        5. +3
          11 September 2025 12: 53
          Quote: Bearded
          We are not like that and are ready to share the latest.

          Well, they were going to share from the very beginning, when there was a joint project. If the dancers hadn't come out then, now they'll have to pay for the license in full + the cost of the machine kits, + the cost of the assembly line and personnel training + ASP, spare parts and consumables. Their Su-30MKI of their own assembly costs the treasury $100 million, and purchasing the same ready-made one in the Russian Federation costs only $50 million, but they're doing it to learn, gain competencies and access to technologies (not all of them, not for engines, etc.). When it comes to ordering 300 licensed machines, the game is definitely worth the candle.
          Quote: Bearded
          Technology leakage, including to the West,

          Controlled, we do not stand still.
          Quote: Bearded
          competition in the market from India

          It won't happen. A license is also needed for this, and our machine kits. And they will never compete with us in terms of price. It's just that their planes will always be 1,5-2 times more expensive.
          1. +1
            12 September 2025 04: 48
            Quote: bayard
            Their Su-30MKI of their own assembly costs the treasury $100 million, while purchasing the same ready-made one from the Russian Federation costs only $50 million, but they do this to learn, gain competencies and access to technologies.
            But first and foremost, to put a tick in the box that everyone interested in career growth is actively promoting the “make in India” program.
            And the difference in price is because dancing with elephants is not cheap, and the dancers in their free time are "danced" by the right "dancers", and the elephant drivers are the nephews of the right uncles. But this is India, there is no way to do without dancing with elephants.
            1. 0
              12 September 2025 08: 49
              Of course, these are the peculiarities of intra-Indian pricing with elements of what you described above, but there is also an objective part - the cost of the license, the cost of the assembly line and training of personnel and production, the export markup on machine kits. That is why I showed the spread "by 1,5-2 times", where by 1,5 is without excessive abuse of the right dancers and their uncles, by 2 times - when the uncles dance together with the elephant drivers and Indian dancers.
              If a "bare plane" without spare parts, ASP, simulators, training, etc. from Russia costs 50 million, and the machine kit + license and share of expenses on the line + about the same, India will never become a competitor on the foreign market. Because we have already learned to make payments outside the dollar settlement system. And soon the BRICS settlement system will remove this problem as such.
              The Indians will now have to very vigorously make up for what they have lost due to their own stupidity, filling their Air Force with 5th generation aircraft. They need to somehow catch up with China and Pakistan. If only they would pay regularly and preferably in advances.
        6. +1
          11 September 2025 21: 24
          Quote: Bearded
          France refused to hand over ancient technologies to India. And we, like, are not like that and are ready to share the newest ones.

          They will learn a lot from screwdriver assembly. They will definitely not be sold the technology to make motors, at most they will be trusted to assemble motors from Russian parts, and the main secret there is the technology for producing blades and nozzle parts. As for the airframe, the secret is not how to stamp and rivet the parts together, but how exactly this form was chosen. As for electronics, they will be given external interfaces, but not the internal structure, and as for software, they will also be told where and how to embed additional code modules, but they will not give the source codes. In general, the risks are no greater than with the SU-30, which they have been riveting for a long time.
      3. +3
        11 September 2025 17: 55
        How so? The question is to the point, and there are a bunch of minuses for it. What are the reasons of the minus-takers (or rather, minus-takers)?
    3. +2
      11 September 2025 08: 34
      Quote: Bearded
      India is an unreliable and multi-vector partner in the creation of modern weapons.

      I would say that the partner is situational. The current situation does not allow India to become a full colony of the USA.
      Quote: Bearded
      Nothing good will come out of the joint production of the Su-57. For us.

      There is one nuance. We have no opportunity to increase the production of military aircraft. Our democrats have destroyed the military-industrial complex in the field of aircraft manufacturing. But the military conflict in Europe is rapidly approaching our borders.
      1. +1
        11 September 2025 08: 49
        Quote: APASUS
        Quote: Bearded
        India is an unreliable and multi-vector partner in the creation of modern weapons.

        I would say that the partner is situational. The current situation does not allow India to become a full colony of the USA.
        Quote: Bearded
        Nothing good will come out of the joint production of the Su-57. For us.

        There is one nuance. We have no opportunity to increase the production of military aircraft. Our democrats have destroyed the military-industrial complex in the field of aircraft manufacturing. But the military conflict in Europe is rapidly approaching our borders.

        DPRK is much preferable to India.
        1. +3
          11 September 2025 11: 51
          Quote: Bearded
          DPRK is much preferable to India.

          Yes, but they may not have enough competence.
        2. +1
          11 September 2025 12: 14
          DPRK is much preferable to India.


          They have no money.
        3. +4
          11 September 2025 13: 04
          Quote: Bearded
          DPRK is much preferable to India.

          The DPRK will receive ready-made vehicles, they don't need as many as India (300 units), so there's no point in Kim starting his own assembly, and Komsomolsk is nearby. We are allies, we'll provide everything necessary.
          Quote: APASUS
          We have no capacity to increase production of military aircraft.

          For the production of Su-57, 3 (three) assembly lines with a production capacity of 30 aircraft per year each have been built. It is expected that at least half will be exported. The 1st has already reached full capacity, the 2nd has produced its first products this year (6 units for Algeria), the 3rd is finishing assembly and will most likely produce a two-seater version.
          That is why this year they started concluding contracts for the delivery of Su-57 to foreign customers. Several contracts have already been signed, applications have been received for several more and negotiations are underway. There will be enough capacity. Together with the Indian line, there will be 4 (four) assembly lines with a capacity of up to 120 aircraft per year. India, however, will have to work tirelessly on its line for 15 years to meet its needs.
          Su-34M, Su-30SM2 and Su-35S\SM are also being delivered at 30 units per year from this year.
          Compare these figures with those of the USA and you will be very surprised - we are on par with them.
      2. -5
        11 September 2025 09: 39
        Quote: APASUS
        There is one nuance. We have no opportunity to increase the production of military aircraft. Our democrats have destroyed the military-industrial complex in the field of aircraft manufacturing.

        Listen, dear! Why are you inventing this, dear? It has long been known, listen, that India was considering aircraft with the placement of their production in India.
        1. +2
          11 September 2025 15: 26
          Quote: Vladislav_V
          Why are you inventing a darogoy, huh? Listen, it has been known for a long time that India was considering aircraft with the placement of their production in India.

          India has been considering many things for a long time, but this is India and we need to take this into account.
          1. -2
            11 September 2025 15: 33
            You probably wanted to say that India has a "Make in India" policy and this should be taken into account?
            Russia is ready to support India's initiative to manufacture military products under the Make in India program. This was stated by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov following talks with Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar.
            1. +4
              11 September 2025 16: 22
              Quote: Vladislav_V
              You probably wanted to say that India has a "Make in India" policy and this should be taken into account?
              Russia is ready to support India's initiative to manufacture military products under the Make in India program. This was stated by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov following talks with Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar.

              Trying to follow the path of Made in India, they make many mistakes. It is very difficult to negotiate with them. I know from our ships for the Indian Navy. Their requirements are sometimes greater than the displacement of the vessel, if everything is as they want to build, then the vessel will stand on its keel right at the pier.
              1. -3
                11 September 2025 16: 32
                Business is generally difficult to do with other countries, and arms business is doubly difficult! Because politics and its guarantees are added to business hi
    4. -3
      11 September 2025 09: 55
      Multi-vector - yes. And this is normal for such a large country with difficult powerful neighbors. But as for unreliability - this is clearly beyond reason, India bought the S-400 after the US unsheathed its sanctions club. Now they can't be happier - with such air defense, only a kamikaze will be able to fly to India - and even he will be shot down.
    5. +1
      11 September 2025 15: 10
      Nothing good will come out of the joint production of the Su-57. For us.

      In essence, the Indians paid for the organization of production of the Su-30SM for the Russian Aerospace Forces, ensuring the return on investment and, in general, the continued existence of aircraft manufacturing in Russia.
      If the Indians pay for the Su-57 assembly line, well, let them fly the 57s. There is nothing terrible about it, there are no fantastic secrets in the 5th generation aircraft, if necessary, it will even be possible to take the excess out of the aircraft for India and invest in something simpler.
    6. 0
      13 September 2025 09: 16
      Will they pay as usual, with paper money from the joke bank?
    7. 0
      16 September 2025 20: 49
      Quote: Bearded
      Nothing good will come out of the joint production of the Su-57. For us.

      Thanks to the Indians, we lost the buyer of the Yakhont, and thanks to the Indians, we lost the buyer of the SU-30, now we will lose the buyer of the SU-57? Do we need that? We need to work hard and build a twin plant to the one in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. Or use the capacity of the MIG.
      It is hard to believe that the capacity of the existing factories will not be able to cover the loss of aircraft due to the SVO, without the help of India.
      And at the built twin plant, use "specialists" brought from Central Asia wassat
      After all, they are imported in millions for this purpose? They are the hope of the Russian economy, as our economists, financiers and industrialists say.
      But seriously, we urgently need to return to the Soviet education system, just at a modern level.
  2. +18
    11 September 2025 05: 23
    We just need to check who is lobbying for the delivery of SU-57s from our side, for what kind of bribes, when we are conducting a protracted SVO, when NATO does not hide its aggressive intentions. Ask: have you filled your Air Forces with SU-57s with a reserve for a long war with NATO?
    1. +14
      11 September 2025 06: 33
      Quote: V.
      We just need to check who is lobbying for the supply of SU-57s from our side, and for what kind of bribes

      What is there to check, this is peripheral capitalism, where the country's resources are pumped out, and the assets are somehow transferred to the metropolis. It doesn't matter, oil, gas, or technology, the main thing is money here and now for those who have long had someone else's citizenship, accounts in someone else's banks and foreign currency, palaces and yachts abroad. They don't care much whether their army is saturated, the main thing is to get a quick and maximum profit.
      Here in the comment above it was asked, - "Please list what you see as negative for Russia in this?", as if it is not clear that it is necessary to develop our own production, and not to breed potential competitors, squandering technologies in any form. Secondly, as already noted, the cornerstone should be the equipment of our army, and not someone else's, especially with the most modern weapons.
      1. +4
        11 September 2025 08: 20
        Do I need to remind you that without a foreign order we would not have T-90s in commercial quantities?
        1. 0
          11 September 2025 08: 39
          Il'nur, try to answer the question for yourself: "Why wouldn't we have the T-90 without a foreign order?" Just answer it as honestly as possible.
          1. -1
            11 September 2025 10: 07
            I see, hoholok, you're showing off yours
            1. -5
              11 September 2025 10: 33
              Il'nur, of course, wagging your tongue/pressing buttons on the keyboard is not straining your brain. You don't have to answer me, I know the answer without you and for a long time, answer yourself and remember the words of the great Omar Khayyam: "Don't lie to yourself - with time you will understand that with this lie you betray yourself."
          2. +1
            11 September 2025 19: 00
            Quote: bug120560
            "Why wouldn't we have T-90 without a foreign order?" Just answer as honestly as possible.

            Is it really the communists' fault again? After all, all this happened in the legendary 90s! Just at the moment when our country and us along with it were sold out.
            1. 0
              11 September 2025 19: 12
              Vlad, what do the communists have to do with this? It's just that instead of strengthening our defense capabilities, we are constantly ready to throw budget funds at rather dubious projects that are tempting in their future profitability. The sunken pipes of SP-2, the construction of a nuclear power plant in Turkey, the leasing of nuclear submarines to India, and many other examples. Although this is my personal opinion.
              1. -2
                11 September 2025 19: 20
                Look at the year of production of the first T-90, they fit exactly in 1992. But the fact that the country that had just been divided, sold and could not buy a tank, was to blame for everything
                leasing of nuclear submarines to India and many other examples of this. and betrayed to blame nuclear power plant in Turkey pipes SP-2

                Ironclad logic! My respects. good
                1. -1
                  11 September 2025 19: 30
                  Vlad, what does the wild 90s of the last century have to do with it? We've been living in the XNUMXst century for a quarter of a century now. And what, did anything change before the start of the SVO?
                  1. -2
                    11 September 2025 19: 37
                    Look up and read!
                    Quote: bug120560
                    "Why wouldn't we have T-90 without a foreign order?" Just answer as honestly as possible.

                    Answer: Because in the 1990s there was a large-scale economic supercrisis, and the T-90 tank project was saved by a large contract with India!
                    https://russian.rt.com/russia/article/1056736-t-90-sozdanie-modernizaciya-proryv
        2. +1
          11 September 2025 10: 37
          Quote from iommy
          Do I need to remind you that without a foreign order we would not have T-90s in commercial quantities?
          Commercial quantities? According to open sources, we produced more than 2000 T-90 tanks of various modifications, of which about 1500 were exported. It turns out that only 500 vehicles were produced for our army, such were the priorities.
          In 2014, as they explain now, we were not ready, how did we prepare for the SVO in 8 years, why has this operation been going on for 3,5 years already, and there is no end in sight? A positional deadlock, in which instead of tank wedges, there are guys on mopeds in assault deuces and triplets. Where is air supremacy, where is our Black Sea Fleet? So, we have to think about why everything is like this, and these thoughts are not cheerful.
          1. +2
            11 September 2025 10: 48
            well ok, then we would have received the UVZ in the same condition as the Omsk ZTM

            Ask about the Black Sea Fleet the people who recognized Moscow as ready for battle and sent it without an entourage and cover "somewhere there"
            1. +2
              11 September 2025 11: 59
              Quote from iommy
              Ask the people who recognized Moscow as ready for battle about the Black Sea Fleet
              It's not just "Moscow", or rather, another Moscow, or more precisely, the Kremlin. Not only did the Omsk Tank Plant go bankrupt, but the "optimizers" closed down a lot of factories, design bureaus and research institutes.
              In any case, to the SVO, fighting and trading with enemies is immoral, at the very least.
              "Devil's Advocates" and thematic "firewalls" will, of course, push for trade, because otherwise others will sell. But they will slyly keep silent about why the same States will not sell their newest systems even to some NATO allies, not to mention our mother Russia and those who are considered enemies. In any case, such a thing is fraught with litigation and problems for enterprising businessmen.
              In our country, any eccentric who even accidentally transfers his pension to the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be charged with terrorism and treason, with a possible maximum of years in prison. The same Gazprom paid Nazi Ukraine about 1,3 billion dollars a year for transit, as well as supplied gas to Russia's enemies, and that was normal.
              How should all this be understood...
              1. +1
                11 September 2025 17: 55
                Well, that's how it should be understood - the profiteer is the main one today, everything revolves around him. And the authorities need to show their work. Who else, if not a pensioner, an unnecessary Soviet, to make a terrorist?
        3. +1
          16 September 2025 20: 55
          Quote from iommy
          Do I need to remind you that without a foreign order we would not have T-90s in commercial quantities?

          If it weren’t for the total theft by bureaucrats at all levels, the T-90 would be in service in all tank units, and not the T-62, T-64 and T-72 with any letters and without the Indian order.
    2. 0
      11 September 2025 13: 33
      Quote: V.
      Ask: have you filled your Air Force with SU-57s in reserve for a long war with NATO?

      Well, three assembly lines have been built for the production of Su-57 (the fourth will be in India). Each with a production capacity of 30 aircraft per year. The first has already reached full production capacity. The second has produced its first products this year (1 units for Algeria), the third is finishing assembly. For India, negotiations and calculation of the contract cost are still underway (up to 2 Su-6E under license from our machine kits).
      For our Aerospace Forces this year there are 30 Su-57s, most of them have already been delivered, by the end of the year the troops will have 74 Su-57s - three regimental sets of two-squadron composition. By the end of next year there will be more than a hundred. We need to have time to train pilots now, because in addition to the rearmament of regiments from Su-27SM-3 to Su-57, the Aerospace Forces are deploying 8 new air regiments. So now we have more questions about training new pilots than about deliveries of new aircraft. Su-34M, Su-30SM2 and Su-35S\SM this year there are 30 units each - all lines have reached full capacity. The civilian aircraft manufacturing sector helped with personnel, while there is import substitution and certification, they will train new ones. Military\combat aviation is more important now.
      I myself have many complaints about our vertical, but it is in this sector that we have seriously improved. And the credit for that goes to the new Minister of Defense, who, unlike Kozhugetych, does not promote himself at all. A good example for the others.
  3. +11
    11 September 2025 05: 31
    Russia has saddled the Chinese auto industry, and nothing
    There is nothing good about this.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Des
      +7
      11 September 2025 06: 28
      In full:
      "Our own is, of course, yes, but Russian is better. At least, this postulate is valid for India. But if it is the other way around - yes, in the end, Russia has saddled the Chinese auto industry, and nothing..."
      It was not the Russian Federation that saddled the great Chinese auto industry)), but rather the PRC auto industry (admiration!) - with surprise and joy, flooded the Russian market.
    3. 0
      16 September 2025 21: 00
      Quote: Nagan
      Russia has saddled the Chinese auto industry, and nothing
      There is nothing good about this.

      It’s not that there is no good, but on the contrary, there is only bad.
      Because of this, we are not developing our own automobile industry.
  4. +6
    11 September 2025 05: 47
    It is entirely expected that such a development of events will occur when, for the sake of yet another “long-term and fruitful” reconciliation with India, Russian officials will be forced “from above” to sign agreements on any terms, without regard to profitability, cost-effectiveness, and rationality.
  5. -1
    11 September 2025 06: 02
    All they need is the design of the plane itself.
    Body + motor. If they want a motor, they can install their own.
    And they will install all their own electronics.
    1. +4
      11 September 2025 09: 43
      If we look at the "long-term" Tejas and the sad history of the development of the Kaveri turbofan engine for it, then for the Indian aviation industry, even with foreign assistance, the development of even a good light fighter of the 4+ generation turned out to be unaffordable in the XNUMXst century.

      So, the statement about “they can install their own engine” definitely does not apply to modern Indian aircraft engine manufacturing.

      As for Indian electronics. For the Su-30MKI, the Indian DRDO has still not been able to develop even a towed active radar decoy of its own design. They chose for integration (which, if my memory serves me right, has not yet begun) the Israeli active decoy X-GUARD.

      Therefore, talk about installing an Indian AESA radar and an Indian-developed Advance Self Protection Jammer (ASPJ) jamming station during the modernization of the Su-30MKI is talk about another long-term construction project that could be something and will be completed in about ten years, when it will no longer be needed.

      The only thing that India has managed to do more or less is develop aviation onboard electronic computers (based on Western electronic components). That is why the same Su-30MKI has Indian-designed and assembled onboard computers. They are already outdated today.
      1. +1
        11 September 2025 11: 12
        I confused Indians with Chinese.
        The Indians have nothing.
  6. +4
    11 September 2025 06: 18
    I have a question: by supplying weapons and military technology to India, won’t we alienate China, which, in these difficult times for us, nevertheless supports us?
    1. +1
      11 September 2025 12: 00
      How? No way... This would be more correct.
    2. 0
      11 September 2025 19: 42
      And I had a question: by supplying technologies and products to Western countries and refusing to support the CIS in any way, won’t China push us away?
      We love to whine about the terrible China, which doesn't need us at all, completely forgetting that the Chinese are just as dependent on us. To hell with the market, we are an excellent defense from the north, just like the DPRK is from the east, our existence in its current form is NECESSARY to the PRC to ensure its own security, while we are on this course towards a multipolar world and so on. China can at least be sure that we, like Ukraine or the Central Asian countries, will not suddenly blossom with a huge number of NATO bases right in their underbelly, so China will tolerate all our affairs with India, and our affairs with the countries of Southeast Asia, with which it is also in constant conflict.
  7. -1
    11 September 2025 06: 36
    If India will only have screwdriver assembly, then why not. Even if they supply for export, we will still supply spare parts for these aircraft.
  8. +8
    11 September 2025 06: 47
    if you use the Indian base for partial production of aircraft in their needs

    Now there is a SVO. How many weapons did the Indians supply us with? It is known that they gave the Bandar-logs through third countries. And what about us? their needs We must produce ourselves, and not rely on someone else. And we have everything we need for this.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. -1
      11 September 2025 08: 28
      and we asked if they sell?
      1. +5
        11 September 2025 08: 31
        Quote from iommy
        and we asked if they sell?

        Do you think that we only asked Iran and the DPRK, with whom we had no relations at all until 22 (except for sanctions against them)?
  9. 0
    11 September 2025 07: 08
    Quote: V.
    We just need to check who is lobbying for the delivery of SU-57s from our side, for what kind of bribes, when we are conducting a protracted SVO, when NATO does not hide its aggressive intentions. Ask: have you filled your Air Forces with SU-57s with a reserve for a long war with NATO?

    That's what they write about in the article so that Russia could buy "Indian" SU-57s for its Aerospace Forces)) It looks like a war with Europe is just around the corner (it won't start in 28-30 as they write there)...
    1. +7
      11 September 2025 08: 26
      Quote: Andrey Andreev_2
      This is what they write about in the article so that Russia could buy "Indian" SU-57s for its Aerospace Forces))

      This is fiction. Not scientific:)
  10. +1
    11 September 2025 07: 08
    Minor correction. Most of the Indian jets were not shot down by Chinese copies of the MiG-21. Most of the Indian jets were shot down by Chinese J-10 fighters, which are Chinese copies of the Israeli Lavi.
    1. +2
      11 September 2025 08: 33
      Quote: Danil Timoshenko
      Most of the Indian planes were shot down by Chinese J-10 fighters

      Is not a fact
      Quote: Danil Timoshenko
      , which are a Chinese copy of the Israeli Lavi fighter.

      This is even more fantastic than what is written in the article.
      The Lavi was copied from the F-16 but not finished to perfection; the documentation was handed over to the Chinese, yes, but our MiG designers took part in the work on the J-10.
      1. 0
        11 September 2025 10: 06
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        Is not a fact

        The Pakistan Air Force attributed all victories in the night battle on May 7, 2025, to pilots flying J-10CE aircraft.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India–Pakistan_conflict

        "On June 6, the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) claimed that No. 15 Squadron, also known as the Cobras, shot down six Indian Air Force (IAF) fighter jets. The squadron is based at Pakistan Air Force Base Minhas in Kamra and operates J-10C multirole fighters armed with PL-15 air-to-air missiles. The squadron is said to have shot down three Rafales, one MiG-29, one Mirage-2000 and one Su-30MKI. According to Dawn, the Cobras used 18 of the squadron's 20 aircraft for the interception mission on May 7."

        Thus, Skomorokhov's story about Indian combat aircraft allegedly defeating "Pakistani MiG-21s, to which China attached new noses and changed the avionics", meaning JF-17 Block III fighters, is based more on some of the author's internal ideas about the battle of May 7, 2025, than on Pakistani sources.
        The Lavi was copied from the F-16 but not finished to perfection; the documentation was handed over to the Chinese, yes, but our MiG designers took part in the work on the J-10.

        The J-10CE, for example, has a DSI air intake that reduces its frontal EPR, which was never used in the Lavi project, which was tested in the 90s on an experimental version of the F-16, but never appeared on serial fighters of this type, and which MiG specialists were unlikely to have ever worked on.

        And most importantly, the J-10CE has a modern, powerful AESA radar that provides a detection range of ~220 km for a fighter-type target (RCS 5 sq. m), while the RBE2-AA radar of the Rafale fighter detects a similar target (RCS 3 sq. m) at a range of ~130 km:

        https://www.deagel.com/Components/KLJ-10/a004390
        https://www.deagel.com/Components/RBE2/a001508#002

        It was this, as well as the use of long-range PL-15 air-to-air missiles, that led to the Pakistani J-10CEs' clean sweep of the air battle on May 7, 2025.
  11. +5
    11 September 2025 07: 18
    As a virtuoso of slipping between streams, the author of the article ingratiatingly tries to prove to us that the transfer of the remnants of high technology of countries to third parties is even a blessing for them. Here it is, Gorbachevism in its purest form. I just want to say, son, the "holy" nineties never taught you anything. It is impossible to teach such people....they look for a justifying benefit in any, even rotten business....Russia has no comrades...except for Kim...for now. The rest are weather vanes. They will turn with the wind, only it will become favorable.... and we will get hit in the face by the same Su-57, crawling around the world....a living example, Soviet armored vehicles and weapons collected in the world against us....Satan the tempter has come out!!!
    1. -2
      11 September 2025 08: 27
      it's always like this:
      you supply resources - a gas station that is unable to supply the final product
      you deliver the final product - you squander the technology, Gorbachevshchina
      you decide there
      1. -2
        11 September 2025 08: 39
        Quote from iommy
        always like that

        It's just a job - to move a pipe Yes
        1. +4
          11 September 2025 08: 58
          only the article does not propose supplying the final product and developing high-tech production at home, but rather developing such production in another country at our expense.
          1. 0
            11 September 2025 09: 06
            Quote: Guest
            only the article suggests

            This is for the author of the article.

            Quote: Guest
            to develop such production in another country at our expense

            I heard somewhere (maybe they are lying) that one plane sold abroad pays for 3 of the same ones assembled for the Russian Armed Forces. If so, it is still a big question what and at whose expense will be the result.
      2. +1
        11 September 2025 09: 17
        Quote from iommy
        deliver the final product

        The article does not describe the delivery of the final product, but the transfer of technologies for its production. This is a little different, so
        Quote from iommy
        you decide there

        Inappropriate.
        Another question is that they will rather transfer the screwdriver assembly
    2. +1
      11 September 2025 10: 20
      Quote from moneron
      As a virtuoso of slipping between streams, the author of the article ingratiatingly tries to prove to us that the transfer of the remnants of high technology of countries to third parties is even a blessing for her. Here it is, Gorbachevism in its purest form.

      The USSR transferred the MiG-21 fighter production technology to India in the first half of the 1960s, when the MiG-21 fighter was still the USSR's "high technology". Assembly of the MiG-21FL in India from supplied machine kits began in 1964. Then the Indians mastered the full cycle of licensed production of the MiG-21. Of the 874 MiG-21s delivered to the Indian Air Force, 657 were produced by the Indian aircraft manufacturing corporation HAL under license.

      Thus, as you put it, "pure Gorbachevism" with regard to the transfer of licenses for the production of domestic high-tech weapons began with regard to India back under Khrushchev. "Pure Gorbachevism" with regard to the transfer of licenses for the production of domestic high-tech weapons began with regard to China back under Stalin.

      "He who knows the past deserves the future"
  12. +3
    11 September 2025 07: 27
    The US has already gone down this path, when they started producing everything in China to make it "cheaper", and now the US is a country of services. So what, should we go down this path? We have a lot of "young people" looking for a good, high-paying job, and a huge number of people with higher education (promising) are leaving the country due to the lack of decent work - look on the Internet, this data is open and they are not hiding it. Since this year, there have been restrictions even on the number of students in paid education - where are we going? Maybe let them, if India is in a hurry, they send qualified builders and help build a plant to produce aircraft, and Russia is staffing workers and equipment during this time. And we have technology and production, etc. ... and an increase in the standard of living. And the fact that the Indians want their own radars, etc., is secondary, and can be solved by designers in India and Russia... If Russia lacks labor resources, fine, let them send Indians on a rotational basis to the Siberian fields, and the Russians develop and re-master industry and technology. Then the sheep are safe (we don't squander technology) and the wolves are fed (the Indians with airplanes), and the standard of living in Russia will increase. And the money will be useful, and we won't store it in Europe and who knows where else. At the very least, we can make a large-unit delivery to India, and also sort out the issue of aircraft engines for China.
  13. +2
    11 September 2025 08: 33
    We want to be friends.
    We.
    And if you think about it, do we need it???
    Let them want to be friends with us. Let them reach out to us. Let them pull themselves up to be worthy of being friends with us.
    Let them be afraid of losing this friendship for the slightest mistake.
    What progressive technologies? What India? Land is one sixth of the land. Lots of people. We build a plant and start producing airplanes.
    The basis of the country's well-being has always been and will be the income of citizens. If a citizen has an income that fully satisfies his needs, he is happy and the state is stable. It is necessary not to sell technologies but to increase production. To improve the qualifications of our own labor force.
    India wants a plane? Let it pay. We will make it and give it to you.
  14. +1
    11 September 2025 08: 39
    Any technically literate person understands that if there is a well-established production, then its expansion is not an impossible task. All over the world, any production is rapidly and happily expanding when the demand for its products increases.

    All over the world!
    But not in Russia.
    In Russia, if, for example, 2 planes are produced per month,
    then it is no longer possible to produce 3.
    Not for any amount of money.

    Can anyone explain this idiocy?
    1. -1
      11 September 2025 10: 28
      Quote: km-21
      But not in Russia.
      In Russia, if, for example, 2 planes are produced per month,
      then it is no longer possible to produce 3.
      Not for any amount of money.

      Russia has produced 66 Su-57s to date.

      https://www.deagel.com/Aerospace%20Forces/Su-57/a000333#002

      and the transition to production of 30 Su-57s per year is underway.

      At the same time, the US is reducing production of the F-35. In 2026, the US Air Force plans to buy only 24 F-35As.

      https://www.airandspaceforces.com/2026-budget-air-force-fighter-fleet/

      The Air Force plans to buy just 24 F-35 fighters in fiscal year 2026 — half as many as previously planned — but will acquire 21 more F-15EX fighters, Pentagon officials said in a June 26 budget proposal to Congress that includes significant changes to the Air Force's tactical fleet.

      Under the proposed budget, the Air Force plans to retire all A-10 close air support aircraft two years ahead of schedule while allocating $3,5 billion for a new F-47 fighter. In other aviation projects, the Air Force plans to increase production capacity for the B-21 bomber, and the Navy is suspending development of the F/A-XX next-generation fighter.

      Maybe you have some explanation for this?
    2. -4
      11 September 2025 12: 19
      to build the third one you have to pour a lot of money into production and then what? what if you don't need so many planes?
  15. 0
    11 September 2025 08: 54
    The article may be correct, but for some reason it’s embarrassing....
  16. +2
    11 September 2025 08: 54
    On the other hand, if everything goes as planned, Russia could receive an additional influx of new aircraft, which would have a really positive impact on the state of the Aerospace Forces.

    How can you write this nonsense? The main problem of the Russian Aerospace Forces is PILOTS, there really aren't enough of them. And it will take years to fix the situation, during which time you can easily expand your own production!
    What's the point of having extra planes if there's simply no one to pilot them?
    I won't even mention the author's desire to benefit India at our expense - let's move all our production there now, right? We still have oil and gas!
    1. +1
      11 September 2025 11: 31
      About the lack of pilots. "Where do you get the firewood?" Without irony and sarcasm.
      1. 0
        11 September 2025 22: 32
        The mess that was created both before Serdyukov and under him will continue to haunt us for a long time. There is a shortage in the school. There are not many people who want to enroll. And of those who really want to, many do not pass due to health reasons.
        Talk to the flyers, they will tell you.
        1. 0
          12 September 2025 13: 14
          That is, you have no specifics. The recruitment there is more or less normal. There is a shortage of instructors, yes. About the shortage of pilots in the troops.... that is interesting.
  17. 0
    11 September 2025 08: 57
    They couldn’t produce the Rafales themselves, now they want the Su-57E.
    It will be 2 times more expensive than in Russia.
    Algeria decided to buy.
  18. -6
    11 September 2025 08: 57
    I believe that producing the Su-57 in India is a good option, but with a number of restrictions.
    Good because it will create additional potential for the development and export of next-generation aviation. But at the same time, we cannot give everything at once to the Indians. For example, it is better to agree to import engines 100% from the Russian Federation, full integration with our weapons. We only need our technologies and standards to be disseminated in practical use. And additional exploitation will allow us to work on problems and errors better.
    It is also highly desirable that HAL have our trainees and representatives present to train personnel and experience for our aviation industry.
    1. +1
      11 September 2025 11: 25
      I believe that the production of Su-57 in India

      Maybe in India it would be better to produce Ladas, Moskvichs, KamAZs or what was developed in Rusnano? smile
      1. -1
        11 September 2025 11: 32
        maybe better, but in order for the project to have a combat-ready and timely upgradeable vehicle, it will have to be produced somewhere. And with the Ministry of Defense's orders for 2-3 vehicles per year, this is simply impossible. China already produces 4 lines of its stealths and they are not particularly interested in this.
        Therefore, I came to this conclusion. And it would be good to involve Egypt and a number of countries like Indonesia in this project. Only we need to make sure that unnecessary technologies do not leak out in the process. As a result, we will get a ready market for promoting our developments.
        Without a market, our weapons will quickly degrade. So some kind of compromise is needed.
  19. +1
    11 September 2025 09: 00
    As I understand from this
    India is asking for a calculation of no more and no less than the volume of investment required to establish production of the Su-57 at a plant in the state of Maharashtra.
    only a trial balloon was sent our way. Maybe that's where it will all end, since it's quite possible that the volume of required investments will seem unbearable to the Indians. Especially if the Indian officials, on whom the decision will depend, do not find a way to get a kickback that they consider worthy for their personal pockets.
  20. +2
    11 September 2025 09: 26
    Quote: Civil

    P.S. Elephants will dance and fray nerves to the point of exhaustion, trying to get a bribe and a discount.


    The aforementioned French have a humorous expression: "Hindu contract".
    Not as harsh as "This is Berezina", but very close to our "Suitcase without a handle".
    1. +4
      11 September 2025 13: 01
      The aforementioned French have a humorous expression: "Hindu contract"
      And programmers have an expression "Indian code", in which even the devil himself cannot understand anything wink
      1. +2
        11 September 2025 13: 09
        Quote: Dutchman Michel
        There is an expression "Indian code" in which even the devil himself cannot understand anything

        Okay, the code, but when the data structures belay laughing
        1. +2
          11 September 2025 14: 39
          Quote: Paranoid62
          Okay, the code, but when the data structures
          A data structure written in a programming language cannot be created without one. And here the concept of "Indian code" appears, which is not clear even to the coder himself. wink
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
  21. +2
    11 September 2025 09: 44
    "India has never been considered a developer of new electronic equipment"///
    ---
    It is listed and developed. The author forgot that India has its own space program. Satellites and lunar probes were launched into space with their own Indian electronics.
    1. +2
      11 September 2025 19: 07
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Satellites and lunar probes were launched into space with their own Indian electronic components.

      Hmmm, let me think... And what does the same Indian Chandrayaan 1 have? An American spectrometer? A radar made in the USA? A Bulgarian dosimeter? An atomic analyzer from the European Space Agency? I can't even figure it out right off the bat...
    2. 0
      13 September 2025 09: 13
      Own - like in the Brazilian Embraer: everything is imported, some hands are our own (but this is not certain). Chips - definitely the USA and Taiwan.
      1. 0
        13 September 2025 11: 03
        Underestimating India's scientific and technical potential is exactly the same as the recent underestimation of China. And Turkey, by the way. India is a rapidly developing economy. Lots of money and investment in technical industries.
        1. +1
          13 September 2025 11: 46
          Soon, another meme will be added to the "English scientists" meme: "Israeli experts".
  22. -3
    11 September 2025 10: 07
    About 30-30% of the cost of the Su-35MKI is created in India during its production. The engines, which are the most complex and expensive part of the product, come from Russia. And not only that. What is Indian? Some avionics, some panels, some missiles (this is already the suspension), some electronics, and the cost of assembling the product. The rest is made in Russia. The following arithmetic is obtained: the Su-30MKI costs $50 million, which means that about 35 are created in Russia, 15 in India. It is profitable for everyone, and India also gets prestige. In the case of the Su-57MKI, it will be about the same, only the quantity will be smaller, but the price will be higher. According to various data available on the Internet, 80-90 million enemy money per plane. Of course, this is profitable, the question remains in the rate of deliveries, we also need them very much, and Algeria needs another 14 planes...
  23. +3
    11 September 2025 10: 11
    At the end of April 2018, India withdrew from the FGFA project. Indian capricious military began to literally whine about how invisibility is not so invisible, and radars do not detect radar, and in general everything is bad and this is not the fifth generation.
    - and our high foreheads are happy to try and again assent and give in to the gypsies! - history teaches nothing.
  24. -5
    11 September 2025 10: 56
    India has been buying our aircraft for 50 years. And if in the times of the USSR it was possible to offer a wide range of aviation equipment, now, alas. It is necessary to remember that licenses for MiG-21, Su-30 did not weaken our Air Force/VKS much, but gave in addition to rupees (which are difficult to dispose of) political influence.
    The Su-57 will inevitably become obsolete, and the aircraft market demands new products.
    There is no need to regret selling the Su-57 to Algeria, and transferring some of the technologies to India is not that dangerous. If we consider such a deal as cooperation, then taking into account our needs, it will be beneficial from all sides.
  25. -2
    11 September 2025 11: 08
    In today's reality, the Su-57 is already becoming obsolete, without ever reaching the stage of mass production. Therefore, there is a reason, primarily economic, to organize production in India. Otherwise, it will be like a dog in the manger - it doesn't eat itself (meaning, it doesn't produce) and doesn't let others eat it. There is no reserve production capacity in the Russian Federation and none is expected. During the time of organizing large-scale production, the Su-57 will become completely obsolete. As the "boss" from the famous film said: "Strike while the iron is hot or while you're still in the cash register.
    1. +2
      11 September 2025 11: 14
      How is the Su-57 becoming obsolete?
  26. +1
    11 September 2025 11: 14
    In general, not up to the 57th, which also showed itself well, but the 35th is an already mastered and tested weapon, and the Su-57 needs to be honed and brought to perfection.

    And how one thing contradicts the other, the production of the Su-35 is limited only by order, so those were the years when the plant delivered 20+ machines (for the Ministry of Defense and for export).
    And we need to switch to the Su-57, why delay?
  27. -1
    11 September 2025 13: 10
    The two-seater thing is some kind of nonsense. Well, the fifth generation is also AI, which makes driving much easier. It's like harnessing a horse to a Ferrari. DB.
  28. +1
    11 September 2025 13: 21
    India has never been a developer of cutting-edge electronic equipment

    Come on! Let's compare Chandrayaan-3 and Luna-25.
  29. +3
    11 September 2025 14: 32
    I would say, a dubious pleasure. We can't figure out civil aviation, and what if we ruin the military one too? At the moment, we need to figure out production in our own country. If there are surpluses, we can talk about international cooperation. Somehow, Boeings and Airbuses are not built in India, and yet there is such a promising market, as they write here.
  30. +4
    11 September 2025 14: 37
    and for what purpose does such an article appear?
    "testing the waters" - before making "fateful" decisions?
    India as a contract manufacturer of equipment???
    maybe they got something mixed up: the technology is not for civilian use at all, moreover, it directly affects the "defense capability of the state"...
    or is the author proposing for consideration a "new scheme" for laundering kickbacks in the industry?
  31. 0
    11 September 2025 14: 49
    We have two extremes: either we give everything or nothing.
    The most successful projects (in terms of sales) are the F16 and F35 and Su30... Here they are, all made in cooperation.
    There are no interested parties from large countries - it will be a one-off aircraft with a limited choice of weapons.
    The same Americans are integrating into their aviation a bunch of weapons that the allies made for the F16 and F35 and Apache, for example.
  32. +1
    11 September 2025 15: 35
    Quote: V.
    We just need to check who is lobbying for the delivery of SU-57s from our side, for what kind of bribes, when we are conducting a protracted SVO, when NATO does not hide its aggressive intentions. Ask: have you filled your Air Forces with SU-57s with a reserve for a long war with NATO?

    I think there is only one candidate here, a friend of mine.
  33. 0
    11 September 2025 23: 48
    Today is Semyon Lavochkin's 125th birthday.
  34. +1
    12 September 2025 08: 05
    Here's what, in order not to regret that they buy "SU 57" from India and not from Russia, there is no point in draining the remains of advantageous technologies and deploying additional production here. Let them buy a finished product from us like Algeria. And we will train our personnel and the deployed capacities will not be superfluous. Take an example from the Pendos.
    1. 0
      12 November 2025 11: 59
      In Tanya, they put people in jail for treason, but here they appoint them for promotion! )))
  35. -2
    12 September 2025 09: 13
    We've wasted more than one gigabyte of information space discussing Indian dances around airplanes.
    fool gigabytes? there it didn't even reach one megabyte, if you save all the comments in a text file then probably 100 kilobytes will turn out or maybe 10 kb, with pictures in articles megabytes will turn out 3 where 2.9 MB are pictures, gigabytes are for video streams and unoptimized software, detailed 3D objects, databases can also be unoptimized and/or just large, different collections - for example music/pictures/photos where each file is usually from 2 to 50 MB, and text information weighs hundreds of thousands of times less and sometimes millions or more times less than other types of information
    1. 0
      12 September 2025 12: 35
      Is it so important? The amount of information in numbers is such that a whole novel was written.
      1. 0
        12 September 2025 20: 52
        No, but would you keep quiet if someone said, for example, that he spent a million rubles on a loaf of bread? Or drove 10000 km/h on a bridge in his Honda, or caught a crucian carp weighing 100 tons
  36. +2
    12 September 2025 09: 25
    Listen, export, money - that's all very well!! BUT, they used to conduct entire American excursions to our submarines (rented), what will stop them from doing the same with airplanes??
  37. +1
    12 September 2025 11: 51
    What wouldn't you do for India, which hasn't refused Russian oil. And it buys it at prices unknown to us!
  38. 0
    12 September 2025 19: 21
    Quote: bayard

    And where is that for you? Because VKS has never had such a figure for the year.
    Last year, as of December 31, there were 44 units.
    In this case, 30 units are in the VKS and 6 units are for export.

    Something is wrong with your numbers again. At the beginning of 2024, 21 aircraft were transferred to the VKS. Moreover, there were exactly zero of them in the combat regiments. They all went to Lipetsk, Akhtubinsk and the 185th center. In 2024, another 6 to 9 aircraft (3 batches on September 12, November 11, December 23).
    And only in 2025 they began to arrive at the 23rd regiment. Until the Ministry of Defense order for 76 vehicles is fulfilled, it's like a long way to China. It's not just the assembly lines in Komsomolsk, but also related companies, such as GRPZ (assembly of the "Belka"), which have their own problems.
    In general, both the article by this Skomorokhov is somehow absurd, and your commentary is of the same category...
  39. 0
    14 September 2025 21: 10
    We need to take a more serious approach to the Su-75. Like the Americans did with the F-35: cooperation-shmoperation, production outside the country, joint development of weapons systems, etc. And keep the Su-57 for ourselves.
  40. +1
    26 September 2025 01: 20
    So we're going to find a fountain of oil in the garden, plug it, and start carving spoons out of wood? Nonsense!
    Everyone needs to use it, but how! Migrants should be brought into the country on a rotational basis (like shift workers in the north, to develop industries and extract resources, etc.), and Russian citizens should work and build/make aircraft engines, planes, rockets, etc. And not give these developments to production in India, so the technologies will remain, and the Russian Federation will become an industrial country, and not a country of resources by 70%, and the people will earn more due to skilled labor, etc. By the way, resources are sometimes easier to sell than the final product, so it’s not that simple, with resources it’s easier to find new clients, especially by lowering the price, than to sell the final product at a loss having spent a lot on its production... India needs S-400, good. We do the documentation, allocate a place near a city with a lot of educated labor force (Tomsk, there is little work for young people there) and begin to train them to work in their specialty. Construction force is brought from India on a rotational basis (they need S-400 faster...) they build The plant (they would have done the same thing on their territory, and Russian engineers designed it. Who else but Russian engineers—they know the production cycles better?) The Indians finished the construction and then went home or to the field in shifts. Their level of knowledge is probably sufficient for construction under the supervision of foremen. Let the Russian engineers and specialists build the S-400 and send the large components to be assembled by propellers...
    Just like the US outsourced all its production to China, we'll outsource it ourselves, and then we'll cry about being a resource-rich country, not an industrial one. And it's not right to squander technology. Then we'll have money from producing high-tech products, and profits from resources... while the migrants, a cheap and poorly educated workforce, came on a rotational basis, created profits, and earned money, so let them go home. The wolves are fed, and the sheep are safe.
  41. 0
    30 September 2025 12: 26
    What they buy from India, they won't buy from us. India is a "handshake-friendly" country. We are not.
  42. 0
    11 October 2025 20: 55
    MiG-21s, to which China attached new noses and replaced avionics, and Chinese missiles completely destroyed the Rafales
    + + + + + + + + + +


    Yeah, and the Su-24 burned Donald Cook's electronics with Khibiny. Yeah, we heard that.

    Skomorokhov, when will you stop talking this nonsense?
  43. 0
    5 November 2025 19: 25
    Here we should check the top management for treason.
    1. 0
      12 November 2025 11: 57
      Capitalism will destroy Russia.
  44. 0
    12 November 2025 11: 56
    Vovan was deceived, just like the Chinese! ))) ...I'm glad to be deceived myself. At Russia's expense, that is.
  45. 0
    22 November 2025 11: 02
    We feed and sponsor whoever we can (supposedly our friends), while we oppress and destroy our own people and our own industries to please the oligarchs, close and not so close to the top.
  46. 0
    11 December 2025 13: 24
    The Indians are still the kind of friends you don't need enemies with, but the leadership once again wants to see... it seems they haven't shoved knives in their backs enough, they probably need more, or our situation is so bad that we are ready to pay with the latest technology