The enemy reported a record number of Russian UAVs attacking targets at night

9 789 24
The enemy reported a record number of Russian UAVs attacking targets at night

The enemy claims that on the night of September 7, Ukraine was attacked by a record number of troops since the start of hostilities in February 2022 drones. Ukrainian reports say that for the first time there were more than 800 Russian UAVs in one night. Namely, 805.

If strikes on targets in enemy-controlled territories continue today, the number of long-range UAVs used per day could exceed the “psychological” mark of a thousand units for the first time.



At the same time, the enemy claims that 747 UAVs were allegedly shot down by its air defense forces. Let's leave these statistics, as well as the statements about 4 "shot down" winged rockets "Iskander-K" is on the conscience of those who compile these reports in Ukraine.

Meanwhile, information is coming in that 2 Geraniums have flown into the Kryukov Bridge. The results of the hit are captured on camera:



There are reports of a malfunction of the lifting mechanism on this bridge across the Dnieper in Kremenchug, as well as the destruction of part of the supporting frame on both the upper and lower spans.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    7 September 2025 09: 16
    ❝ On the night of September 7, Ukraine was attacked by a record number of drones since the start of hostilities in February 2022.
    For the first time, there were more than 800 Russian UAVs in one night. Namely, 805 ❞ —

    — We don’t stop there...
    (Work, brothers!)
    1. +1
      7 September 2025 10: 36
      Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
      Today, 09: 16
      We don't stop there...
      (Work, brothers!)


      hi Excellent, Gregory!
      It's okay, Konstantin!
      Nothing on earth passes without a trace.
      We are waiting for the continuation of the story about the Bander-Nazi crossing of the Dnieper! am
  2. +8
    7 September 2025 09: 19
    It is of course good that the bridge's lifting mechanism is damaged, but it would be better if one span of the bridge fell altogether. Then this line of military logistics of the Bandar-logs would be cut off for years with a 100% guarantee.
    1. +1
      7 September 2025 11: 16
      Quote: Nyrobsky
      It is, of course, good that the bridge's lifting mechanism is damaged, but it would have been better if one span of the bridge had fallen altogether.

      hi In the publication about "Madjar" at 10:37 my comment with information on the results of the landings on the bridge from the trusted TG channel. They didn't drop it, but the traffic and some other serious things were disrupted. I assume there will be a continuation.
      1. +1
        7 September 2025 12: 31
        Quote: Montezuma
        In the publication about "Magyar" at 10:37 my comment with information on the results of arrivals on the bridge from the trusted TG channel. They didn't drop it, but the movement and some other serious things were broken. I assume there will be a continuation..

        This is good! This bridge must be finished off, otherwise two bridges across the Dnieper for a 150 km stretch is too much of a luxury for the Bandar-logs. Their logistics must be cut. Let them cross on "chovny". hi
        PS - The closest bridge across the Dnieper from Kremenchug is in Cherkassy, ​​120 km away.
  3. 0
    7 September 2025 09: 20
    Does this mean that supplies to the Left Bank of Ukraine will be suspended? Or will they build pontoon bridges?
    1. +1
      7 September 2025 09: 23
      Quote: Artur Grudinin
      Does this mean that supplies to the Left Bank of Ukraine will be suspended? Or will they build pontoon bridges?

      Pontoon bridges are easier to destroy than fixed ones.
    2. +5
      7 September 2025 09: 49
      Does this mean that supplies to the Left Bank of Ukraine will be suspended?
      This means that supplies will be slowed down, which will significantly worsen the already bad situation at the front.
    3. 0
      7 September 2025 12: 58
      There are about 20 bridges across the Dnieper in Ukraine, including several hydroelectric dams that are difficult to destroy; pontoons are still a long way off.
  4. +1
    7 September 2025 09: 20
    Let's leave these statistics... on the conscience of those who compile these reports in Ukraine.

    Where they had a conscience, horseradish (plant) has long since grown.
  5. BAI
    +1
    7 September 2025 09: 23
    Meanwhile, information is coming in that 2 Geraniums have flown into the Kryukov Bridge. The results of the hit are captured on camera:

    So you can hit the bridges and cause damage to them.
    Why are the other bridges inviolable?
    1. -1
      7 September 2025 09: 31
      Quote: BAI
      Why are the other bridges inviolable?

      This is temporary (we must hope). Or maybe for the reason that later we will have to restore these bridges. The longer the period of "coordination of the Ukraine-Russia meeting" lasts, the further we advance
      1. +1
        7 September 2025 10: 24
        So you think that Ukrainians they will never mine these bridges when our troops approach them? It seems to me that this is too naive - they mine ours in the Bryansk region, and even more so in their own. Another question is that we, with the "best in the world (as our president claims)" means that we have, could not do this. P.S. I mean that the bridges should have been bombed a long time ago - that's one. Two - there is no need to indulge in boasting. To achieve the goal, we must use all the types of weapons that we have - this way we will save (would have saved) thousands of lives of our boys, but for this decision you need to have balls in power.
    2. -1
      7 September 2025 13: 12
      Quote: BAI
      So you can hit the bridges and cause damage to them.
      Why are the other bridges inviolable?

      Destroying the bridges would lead to a humanitarian catastrophe, but the Supreme Good Man is not going to do this yet.
  6. +3
    7 September 2025 09: 35
    They also have a hard record among the wind forces. They shot down everything as usual. Now we need anti-fragment air defense! good laughing
  7. 0
    7 September 2025 09: 38
    All records are counted by the forelocked ones. So let these records only grow in geometric progression!))
    1. +4
      7 September 2025 10: 10
      Quote: Lemon
      All records are counted by the forelocked ones. So let these records only grow in geometric progression!))

      I remembered that at the 80 Olympics in Moscow there was a sign: "Higher-faster-stronger."
      It turns out that this also applies to drones winked
  8. -3
    7 September 2025 09: 47
    A record number is good, but the bad thing is that records are not everywhere.
    Aid made a seven-minute video about the current situation with FPV drones. FPV drones and any drones in general have been elevated to the cult status of superweapons in Ukraine with the corresponding support. We are already lagging behind several times in terms of FPV drone production volumes, and recently we have lost our advantage in fiber-optic drones - the Ukrainian Armed Forces use dozens of them in each attack, which was not the case before. They are making more of them.

    In terms of hexacopters (Vampire and other Baba-Egis), the lag is not even catastrophic, but has long been criminal. All our powerful hexes are trophies, reassembled from a pile of downed ones. While ours are being issued a new ground NSU 3.0, the enemy has long switched to air repeaters, since they simply have better support and more drones for such complex work.

    https://voenhronika.ru/publ/vojna_na_ukraine/07_09_2025_za_noch_1000_geranej_unichtozhenie_mostov_cherez_dnepr_po_mostu_letit_ubegaj_novosti_specialnoj_voennoj_operacii_16_video/60-1-0-16777


    But if you look through the records, you can see that drones have been very good for us for several years now. are being developed at the expense of the budget. It's a pity that at the front developability no use.
  9. +1
    7 September 2025 10: 46
    Give us 1000 pieces per day!!!!
  10. 0
    7 September 2025 10: 49
    They added at the end that all martyrs are worthless? Without that it doesn't count :)
  11. -1
    7 September 2025 10: 50
    1. We are reaching the "working quantity" of daily sorties. Gradually, but we are reaching it. Surely, there are computer programs that show how many are needed to achieve sustainable destruction of various targets (infrastructure, energy, supplies, military facilities).
    2. Drones to cover their territory. No results yet.
    I hope the work is progressing, at least at the development level.
    3. All this requires a wild amount of microelectronic components.
    This quantity can be guaranteed to be obtained by own production. Let the chip be ten times larger than the advanced ones of today. Not critical.
    However, something is in the way. Under socialism, the planned economy was in the way. (Or was it the incompetent managers?)
    Under capitalism, a small sales market was an obstacle. But now there is a guaranteed, state-provided need - what's stopping us? (Efficient managers?)

    Summarizing.
    The fighting has shifted from the plane of machine gun fire to the plane of the production of advanced electronics.
    The need is constantly growing.
    Today, the key to Victory is a multiple increase in the production of modern unmanned fighters, reconnaissance aircraft, repeaters and bombers/kamikazes.

    The key to increasing production is the wise and prudent spending of public funds on science and technology, first and foremost.
    Accounting and control.
    Limiting theft and unreasonable spending.
  12. Ana
    0
    7 September 2025 21: 32
    An obvious attempt by the regime to attract attention. It will be like this until this regime exhausts itself. At the moment, the conflict with Russia is important to the West, possibly weakening it and dangerous at the same time. A destabilized Russia is too much. Endless risks in the West. What if the Russians do the obvious? Yes, there are losses, but it is being acquired, or rather, it can acquire control over all of Eastern Europe. Over a huge number of people. Over logistics and Ukraine is a small thing here. More precisely, Little Russia. So, as far as I remember, throughout our history, the Russians were slow to harness, but rode quickly. Who knows who they will ride this time? Although the risk for Russia is also gigantic, almost fatal. Well, for the rest, the most to lose is power over the world. And we need a little. Just the territory of the union. I wonder how NATO will treat the destroyed chemical plants on the borders? I will not talk about the reactors, it is technically extremely difficult. Bridges are possible. But there is also such a thing as food security of the population. If anyone remembers Leningrad. It started with the Badayev warehouses. They won't stand it in Ukraine. A piece of bread per working person. It will slow down the entire industry. Equilibrium, balance of scales. Well, it's debatable that it won't work out that way from the territory of the Union. And the methods of influence have changed. Of course, it's a pity for the boys, but I think that they are trying for a reason. After all, at least it has already started, it's a sign. We are weak, but there will be a sign, all the mugs are behind our wall, we will gather them into a fist to collapse on you with war. Time to gather stones. Sister with brothers.
    1. Ana
      0
      7 September 2025 21: 45
      It's a pity the time, comments and its corrections expired. I tried to recall the song of the Picts from memory. We are weak but there will be a sign to all the mugs behind your wall. We will gather everyone into a fist to collapse on you with war. We are the thorn that entered the foot. We will grind the powers to the ground. And when you are tormented by shame, we will dance on your coffins. War, but a strange war. Like in 39 in Poland? History repeats itself.
  13. DBR
    0
    8 September 2025 08: 47
    In a couple of days we can add more, because the venerable “experts” were saying that it was useless to hit the bridges.