Attack on Kryukovskiy Bridge over the Dnieper in Kremenchuk

26 582 123
Attack on Kryukovskiy Bridge over the Dnieper in Kremenchuk

There are reports that the Russian Armed Forces, using UAVs, attacked one of the major bridges across the Dnieper in enemy-controlled territory.

The strike hit the central part of the Kryukovsky Bridge in Kremenchuk, Poltava Oblast. This bridge is about 1700 m long. It is a combined, two-tier, drawbridge, designed for both automobile and rail transport links between the two parts of Kremenchuk, and, accordingly, between the left-bank and right-bank parts of Ukraine in this area.



The Kryukovsky Bridge was originally built during the Russian Empire – in 1872. It was destroyed during the Great Patriotic War, and then rebuilt in 1949. It turns out that this is also an “imperial” and “totalitarian” legacy of modern Ukraine. But what about “decommunization” and “de-imperialization”? Where were the Ukrainian “lawyers” looking before?



Local residents observed the landing over the bridge, recording how the Russian Armed Forces UAV flew over the bridge without any opposition from the outside. Defense struck one of the bridge spans.

It also reports the absence of Internet and communication in the right-bank part of the Kremenchug district of the Poltava region. It is assumed that as a result of the strike, cables that had previously been laid across the Kryukovsky Bridge were burned and melted.

It is worth paying attention to the fact that this bridge is the only one in Kremenchuk across the Dnieper. Moreover, it is the only bridge across the Dnieper in the Poltava region. The nearest bridge is 120 km away in Cherkassy. Accordingly, the disabling of the Kryukovsky Bridge can significantly affect the military logistics of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

It is known that in addition to the bridge, the Kremenchug transformer substation, which provides the movement of electric trains, was damaged by fire.
123 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. -9
      7 September 2025 09: 06
      Seriously?! Name me the brand of Russian drone that can critically damage this bridge! This is not serious, it looks more like someone was wagging their finger, like oh oh oh, we can do it again! The burnt control cables will be replaced in a day, and the bridge itself probably wasn't even scratched.
      1. +12
        7 September 2025 09: 19
        Quote: Sergey3
        Seriously?! Name me the brand of Russian drone that can critically damage this bridge! This is not serious, it looks more like someone was wagging their finger, like oh oh oh, we can do it again! The burnt control cables will be replaced in a day, and the bridge itself probably wasn't even scratched.

        If you deliberately hammer the central drawbridge, the bridge will get very badly damaged. There are lifting mechanisms there that are very vulnerable. And it would be even better to heat the metal with napalm.
        1. -9
          7 September 2025 09: 21
          That's right, purposefully and for a long time, but from one geranium only the control cables burned there. I remember how the Antonov bridge was gnawed by American missiles, very long and persistently, they only left small holes in it.
          1. +4
            7 September 2025 09: 24
            Quote: Sergey3
            That's right, purposefully and for a long time, but from one geranium only the control cables burned there. I remember how the Antonov bridge was gnawed by American missiles, very long and persistently, they only left small holes in it.

            They write that the lifting mechanism is damaged. So the steamer will not be able to pass under the bridge. We need to continue drilling.
            1. -17
              7 September 2025 09: 28
              But the bridge is functional!! They won't let you pound it with geraniums for long, they'll put shooters with machine guns, and with enough fire density, none of them will get through. Yesterday I watched a video in Telegram of how a group of men at night on the border with the outskirts of the city were using a rifle to take out all the large drones, the size of geraniums, and not a single one escaped from a dozen men with machine guns.
              1. +10
                7 September 2025 09: 48
                You are confusing it; hitting a horizontally flying low-altitude and low-speed target is not at all the same as hitting a Geranium diving from a height, especially at night.
              2. -1
                7 September 2025 21: 21
                They'll show you something even worse, don't believe it.
          2. +8
            7 September 2025 12: 20
            I wonder why Sergey3 got so many downvotes? The person writes OBJECTIVE things. "Name me the brand of Russian drone that can critically damage this bridge!" - who of the downvoters named it? "...purposefully and for a long time, but only the control cables burned from one geranium..." - who of the downvoters disagrees with this? "...the Antonov Bridge was gnawed by American missiles, very long and persistently, they only left small holes in it..." - who of the downvoters does not want to admit this fact? Hey, people, a fact may not please, but it is a FACT.
            1. 0
              7 September 2025 12: 31
              I didn't put a minus, but I'll explain
              Quote from: ALCA056000
              Tell me the brand of Russian drone that could critically damage this bridge!

              Geranium
              Quote from: ALCA056000
              purposefully and for a long time

              I don't agree with "long". IMHO 100 geraniums in one night will do the job. With a powerful air defense, the help of Iskanders will be needed, of course.
              Quote from: ALCA056000
              they only left small holes in it

              Look at the photo. Are these "small holes"??? The span is already hanging by its snot!
              1. +3
                7 September 2025 12: 56
                "Geranium" - has arrived. Has the bridge received critical damage? What is "long"? Of course, you can hammer a hundred Geraniums in a row - how long will it take, from what point does "long" begin? "In my opinion, it is practically impossible to destroy a structure like the Antonovsky Bridge, you can disable the road surface, which is what was done" (military expert Yuri Knutov). "The Antonovsky Bridge, its length is more than one and a half kilometers, and the main structures, supports there are preserved, so restoration can happen quite quickly, technically it is not difficult to restore the bridge" ... (Vladimir Saldo). Is this "critical damage"?
                1. 0
                  7 September 2025 13: 08
                  Quote from: ALCA056000
                  Is this "critical damage"?

                  Yes, critical.
                  To restore the bridge's functionality, it was necessary to:
                  1. Dismantle damaged spans.
                  2. Make new spans.
                  3. Install new spans.

                  PP. 1 and 3 are not possible in conditions when the emerging equipment is hit by geraniums.
                  1. -1
                    7 September 2025 13: 44
                    In wartime conditions, the rules of reinsurance of peacetime are not followed, so they will patch things up on the spot so that the equipment can pass at least on one lane.
                    1. +1
                      7 September 2025 14: 35
                      Quote: Sergey3
                      they will patch it up on site

                      Above is a photo of the Antonov bridge, what do you suggest to patch on the spot? Most of the bridge beams there are completely broken.
                  2. +1
                    7 September 2025 14: 32
                    Here is a photo of the bridge, yes, several elements of the power structure were damaged, but the damage can only be considered critical for peacetime.
              2. 0
                8 September 2025 09: 08
                The span is not hanging on "snot" but on the supporting beams, which are slightly damaged. Although yes, to put this bridge in order, it is necessary to examine the damage to the supporting structures, and it is much easier to patch or replace the canvas.
              3. 0
                8 September 2025 20: 58
                rytik32
                Your photo is not of the Kryukov Bridge at all! That two-tiered...
                1. 0
                  8 September 2025 22: 45
                  I posted a photo of Antonovsky Bridge in response to a post
                  "The Antonov Bridge was gnawed at by American missiles, very long and persistently, they only left small holes in it"
            2. -7
              7 September 2025 13: 49
              Hey people, a fact may not make you happy, but it is a FACT.

              They do it out of impotent rage, the truth always hurts. Unfortunately, the Russian Defense Ministry has not shown itself from the best side in this war, and, most importantly, apart from the change of the Defense Minister, nothing much has happened for the better, well, we don't have Zhukovs, Rokossovskys, but we have Taburetkins...
              1. -1
                7 September 2025 21: 26
                But I don't agree with this. Liberal whining - everything is bad with us and we are incapable of anything in our bast shoes... I didn't expect that.
            3. +1
              7 September 2025 13: 59
              Geranium 3 with a combat weight of 300 kg, and a dozen Geranium 2 with a weight of 90 kg will make this bridge unusable
              1. -1
                7 September 2025 23: 02
                In the confusion, the Germans forgot to blow up one of the bridges across the Rhine. The Americans captured it.
                The Germans bombed it from jet planes, but without the desired result.
                In the end they bombarded it with artillery fire. With six-inch guns.
          3. +1
            7 September 2025 12: 27
            Quote: Sergey3
            That's right, purposefully and for a long time, but from one geranium only the control cables burned there. I remember how the Antonov bridge was gnawed by American missiles, very long and persistently, they only left small holes in it.

            hi well not so small! but the accuracy of the hit was super 4 missiles probably fit into a diameter of about 3 meters
          4. 0
            7 September 2025 12: 31
            Quote: Sergey3
            only the control cables burned there

            Have you looked at everything yourself and drawn conclusions?
        2. +4
          7 September 2025 09: 40
          No need to moan ahead of time. Take a break, wait for the results.

          Besides, you (we) don't know (don't know) the purpose of the strike. To destroy, to complicate or something else.
      2. +3
        7 September 2025 10: 50
        The Antonovsky Bridge was effectively put out of action. From the photo, I estimated the number of hits at about 30. Each missile contained 23 kg of explosives. And each geranium now contains 90 kg of explosives. So draw your own conclusions...
        1. +1
          7 September 2025 21: 22
          "...Antonovsky Bridge, which the Ukrainian Armed Forces carried out a massive strike using American HIMARS MLRS..." The Himars can fire conventional MLRS missiles (warhead weight up to 160 kg) at a distance of up to 45 km. GMLRS missiles (90-kilogram warhead). "Russian troops carried out a powerful strike from the Iskander OTRK on the Antonovsky Bridge in the Kherson region. As a result of the strike, as reported by Russian military correspondents, the bridge span collapsed," The Iskander warhead weighs 480 kilograms and has several equipment options. Let's draw conclusions about "...30 hits and 23 kg of explosives...". Nothing confusing, rytik32?
          1. +1
            7 September 2025 22: 12
            Quote from: ALCA056000
            Conventional MLRS family rockets

            MLRS is a launcher, not a missile family.

            Quote from: ALCA056000
            GMLRS missiles (90 kg warhead)

            M31 family missiles. They have a 90 kg warhead and 23 kg explosive, as I wrote.
      3. 0
        7 September 2025 12: 33
        Quote: Sergey3
        Tell me the brand of Russian drone that could critically damage this bridge!

        Geranium-3. BC 300 kg. Quite enough for a bridge.
    2. +7
      7 September 2025 09: 59
      Finally Russians are waking up and do what should be done a long time ago.
    3. +2
      7 September 2025 11: 44
      Unfortunately, it is unrealistic to seriously damage such a structure with one or two or three UAVs. There is some damage, but it will be repaired in a few hours or a day. This requires thoughtful, constant work.
      1. -2
        7 September 2025 21: 26
        Have you ever seen or know what cable pulling and cable routing is?
        1. 0
          7 September 2025 22: 22
          No. Please explain.
          1. -2
            8 September 2025 07: 45
            This is not an easy job and it cannot be done so quickly even if they bring in a ton of workers.
            1. +1
              8 September 2025 12: 03
              As far as I can see from the photo, the main structures of the bridge are intact. i.e. traffic will start soon or has already started. The fact that the lifting part of the bridge will not work in the near future is not particularly important, since there is currently no navigation on the Dnieper as such.
  2. +8
    7 September 2025 08: 33
    Red lines finally went on vacation today? What a twist! (c)
    1. +3
      7 September 2025 09: 19
      Quote: Alexey_12
      Red lines finally went on vacation today? What a twist! (c)

      The red lines have only moved slightly into the blue zone. wink
      1. -5
        7 September 2025 09: 36
        That's right. Maybe that boss who ordered to hit the bridge with whatever he had will also be punished for his arbitrary actions. I wouldn't be surprised.
    2. +1
      7 September 2025 11: 13
      Quote: Alexey_12
      Red lines finally went on vacation today? What a twist! (c)

      Looks like they let Dmitry Anatolyevich Medvedev take the wheel... And he WOW! He got his hands on it...
  3. +4
    7 September 2025 08: 34
    ❝ Arriving over the bridge watched locals ❞ —

    — We've waited a long time! We've been waiting for convenient places for observation occupied...
    (We were waiting too)
  4. +4
    7 September 2025 08: 37
    Good, but not enough! Besides, the bridge needed to be hit with something more serious than Gerani! Maybe it was a probe of the air defense object?
  5. +4
    7 September 2025 08: 37
    And it can not but rejoice laughing
    The next bridge is in Cherkassy...
    1. +4
      7 September 2025 12: 15
      Quote: Russobel

      The next bridge is in Cherkassy...

      To begin with, the next bridge is not 120 km away in Cherkassy, ​​but 12 km upstream at Svetlovodsk. The problem is that it includes a hydroelectric power station and a lock. That is, it must be built carefully, without draining the water.
      1. AMG
        +2
        7 September 2025 13: 33
        I confirm. How do we know geography so well?
        1. +2
          7 September 2025 13: 38
          Quote from AMG
          I confirm. How do we know geography so well?

          laughing Soviet school + Google Yandex maps. Try it, you'll like it)
          1. AMG
            +2
            7 September 2025 13: 40
            Great! I just happened to be in those places.
            1. AMG
              0
              7 September 2025 13: 41
              in places both by water and by land.
          2. AMG
            +1
            7 September 2025 14: 00
            Clarification: There is mainly a dam there, and the bridge is only over the lock.
      2. +1
        7 September 2025 14: 03
        In general, I read information that last night the dam in Svetlovodsk was also attacked
        1. +1
          7 September 2025 14: 34
          Yes, somewhere here in the comments it was already about this. The most vulnerable place is the bridge over the lock, you are right. You just need not to touch the doors.
  6. +10
    7 September 2025 08: 41
    Where is Putin looking? What kind of a holiday of disobedience is this? How can they strike at the bridge across the Dnieper? Or is it the possibility of NATO "peacekeeping" forces appearing in Ukraine that has had such an impact?
  7. +8
    7 September 2025 08: 42
    Quote: Lev_Russia
    Finally..

    It seems like a blow to the lifting mechanism is more of a demonstration. The signal is "for those who want escalation." wassat Maybe there will be more signals today!
    1. -1
      7 September 2025 08: 47
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Maybe there will be more signals today!

      In the distant constellation of Tau Ceti
      Everything became incomprehensible to us.
      We send a signal: "What are you doing there?"
      And we are sent back.
      (c) V. Vysotsky laughing

      ZY Greetings Andrey! drinks
      1. +10
        7 September 2025 09: 01
        Alexey, the blow is a demonstration - a signal to the monkey. There is already a photo. To break this Soviet bridge, you need a 1,5-meter bomb. They hit the middle of the lifting span. But this is also good news.
        1. -3
          7 September 2025 09: 07
          Well, it's also obvious that they didn't mine it themselves. There were some bridges that we destroyed by detonating their charges. In general, it's good that we looked a little beyond the red lines - like "what's there?"
          Quote: tralflot1832
          need 1,5

          Well, rather several. They knew how to build in the USSR. It seems like they recently dug up some bridge. Either 500 or 1500 was the arrival. And there - bring 2 concrete mixers and in a day it's as good as new. recourse
        2. +1
          7 September 2025 09: 10
          I agree, the accuracy is high, but I'm afraid even a 1.5 liter bottle won't be enough, it will only make a hole that can be easily patched up.
  8. +2
    7 September 2025 08: 57
    It is necessary to destroy the supports, at least two at the same time, so that the bridge span falls
    1. +3
      7 September 2025 09: 05
      The supports are difficult to hit from the air, they need to be blown up. Otherwise, the spans can be knocked down with an Iskander.
    2. +1
      7 September 2025 09: 07
      Quote from gribanow.c
      It is necessary to destroy the supports, at least two at the same time, so that the bridge span falls

      Maybe that's what they did, you just can't see it in the photo. And there was no point in aiming at the Crimean Bridge! That's what we got in response. We feel sorry to destroy what our fathers and grandfathers built, but for "our brothers without reason" what won't you do wassat
    3. -5
      7 September 2025 09: 12
      Geranium obviously won't be able to even scratch the supports. We need a new class of high-precision missiles with more than a ton of explosives specifically for bridges.
  9. -3
    7 September 2025 09: 03
    Finally they remembered about bridges, and I thought that the enemies in the Russian Ministry of Defense forbid doing this.
  10. +3
    7 September 2025 09: 06
    It's a really good morning today!
    One after another, two pieces of good news - the Bandarlog government building and the bridge across the Dnieper have finally received the attention of our UAVs!
  11. +7
    7 September 2025 09: 23
    If you work systematically on bridges, you can disable them even with drones.
  12. +4
    7 September 2025 09: 26
    Have the true speakers of the Western language built anything in this life, except villages with personal huts made of sheep and sticks under a cherry tree with a garden??? It seems to me that they are now living on the achievements of others.....
    1. +2
      7 September 2025 10: 14
      What have they built in this life, except for villages with personal huts made of rams and sticks under a cherry tree with a garden?

      You've obviously never been to Western Ukraine. You should have seen Lviv, Uzhgorod, Ivano-Frankivsk, Chernivtsi. Not at all puny cities. And the rural houses of Lviv Oblast are much better than in the villages of Voronezh or Kharkov Oblasts. Unfortunately. "Westerners" always traveled to earn money for a long ruble, and they have a cult of home along with Polish culture. Of course, they don't have a large industry, since the KGB didn't trust them, and the West was close. And their brains are structured in a peculiar way, with a layer of nationalism.
      1. -1
        7 September 2025 12: 20
        Well, my friend, you're going too far about big industry. There's more of it in Ukraine than in the European part of the Russian Federation: KRAZ, YUZHMASH, Antonovsky, Nikolaev shipyards, Nikolaev marine diesels, Kharkov tank, Zaporozhye helicopter engines, nuclear power plants, more than in the Russian Federation... There are factories in every city and they're newer than in the Russian Federation. In the Russian Federation, our businessmen don't update factories at all - the equipment is from the time of evacuation and reparations...
        1. +1
          7 September 2025 12: 32
          Quote: begemot20091
          Well, my friend, you're going too far about big industry. There's more of it in Ukraine than in the European part of the Russian Federation: KRAZ, YUZHMASH, Antonovsky, Nikolaev shipyards, Nikolaev marine diesels, Kharkov tank, Zaporozhye helicopter engines, nuclear power plants, more than in the Russian Federation... There are factories in every city and they're newer than in the Russian Federation. In the Russian Federation, our businessmen don't update factories at all - the equipment is from the time of evacuation and reparations...

          hi, the interlocutor said about industry in Western Ukraine and not in general in the former Ukraine
          1. 0
            7 September 2025 12: 40
            On the western side: Lviv Oil Refinery, in Kalush, in Dragobych, in Kuznetsovsk NPP, Lviv Tank, Mogilev-Podolsk Gas Equipment and Instrumentation Plant, Mogilev-Podolsk Machine-Building Plant, Mogilev-Podolsk Instrument-Making Plant. And in Khmelnitsky, and in Lutsk, Chervonograd Metalworking Plant, ... You can look here https://novavlada.info/biznes/novosti/56-zavodov-i-29-elektrostanciy-byli-postroeny-v-ukraine-za-poslednie-2-goda But these are new. For many years (that's how fate worked out, I served and lived) = we built so much for our brothers!!!!!????!!!
  13. -6
    7 September 2025 09: 29
    To destroy a bridge, you need sufficiently long-range, powerful and highly accurate weapons. For example, to disable the Antonovsky Bridge in Kherson, the enemy very effectively used Heimers, which, although not very powerful, hit the designated place very closely. I would like to know if Russia has weapons comparable in effectiveness?
    1. +1
      7 September 2025 09: 39
      Iskanders exist, they are much better than Haimars.
      1. -7
        7 September 2025 09: 56
        Iskanders are capable of hitting area targets with high-explosive or cluster warheads. As for single fortified targets, the effectiveness of their destruction by Iskanders has never been proven. History knows of several attempts to destroy the bridge over Zatoka (Odessa), which were carried out either by Kinzhals or Kalibr. However, no serious results were achieved.
        1. +1
          7 September 2025 10: 01
          But it has been proven that a bridge can be rendered unusable even by 220 mm Heimars. Why we, having Iskanders, Kinzhals, Geranis, Kalibr, Kh-101, Tornado S, do not destroy bridges across the Dnieper is unclear.
          1. -4
            7 September 2025 10: 13
            Most likely because Iskanders, Daggers, etc.
            do not provide the required accuracy of hit.

            Geraniums work more accurately in FPV mode.
            But their charges are too weak.
            1. 0
              7 September 2025 10: 21
              Gerani carry 100 kg of explosives, Iskanders 500 kg, if not all the missiles hit the target it’s not a big deal, you can always finish them off.
              1. -6
                7 September 2025 10: 28
                This Geranium-2 carries 100 kg (or rather 90).
                And Geranium-1 is only 50.
                Moreover, not all 50 kg are explosives.
                About half of this weight is accounted for by the shell.
                1. 0
                  7 September 2025 10: 37
                  What I mean is that it is entirely possible to make bridges unsuitable for traffic, it’s just that someone in the Russian Ministry of Defense really doesn’t want to do it.
                  1. -5
                    7 September 2025 10: 51
                    It is quite possible to make bridges unsuitable for traffic

                    Unfortunately, this task is not as simple as we would like. Powerful and very high-precision (with a deviation of no more than 2 meters) weapons are needed here. And our Iskanders, although they are called high-precision, do not provide the necessary accuracy.
                    1. +1
                      7 September 2025 11: 01
                      I say again, if there aren’t enough Iskanders, then nothing prevents us from sending ten.
                      1. -6
                        7 September 2025 11: 19
                        if a couple of Iskanders are missing
                        then nothing prevents you from sending a dozen

                        The economy is in the way.
                      2. +2
                        7 September 2025 17: 25
                        The economy doesn't prevent Iskander from being sent on a single haimars, but here it suddenly got in the way?
                2. 0
                  7 September 2025 22: 56
                  Quote: km-21
                  Geranium-2 carries 100 kg (or rather 90). And Geranium-1 only 50

                  And the Khimars rocket carries 23 kg. But in your opinion, they destroyed the Antonov Bridge?
            2. +1
              7 September 2025 12: 01
              Most likely because Iskanders, Daggers, etc.
              do not provide the required accuracy of hit.

              There are funds, you transferred them yourself, it’s just a question of improving the accuracy of these very products.
              1. -6
                7 September 2025 12: 08
                it's just a question of improving the accuracy of these very products

                In your words it all seems simple. But in reality, at the level of Russian technologies, this task may prove insoluble.
                1. 0
                  7 September 2025 13: 03
                  Well, I didn't say that it was easy... I just voiced the direction in which our people need to work and noted that we have the means to carry out high-precision strikes)
          2. -1
            7 September 2025 12: 34
            Quote: Mars
            But it has been proven that a bridge can be rendered unusable even by 220 mm Heimars. Why we, having Iskanders, Kinzhals, Geranis, Kalibr, Kh-101, Tornado S, do not destroy bridges across the Dnieper is unclear.

            hi why don't we destroy it? that means there is some reason why we can't do it
            1. 0
              7 September 2025 14: 21
              Pouvoir ou vouloir, telle est la question.
              La logistique militaire ukrainienne utilise ce pont.
              Par cette frappe, le pont est inutilisable actuellement, donc, perturbations des approvisionnements aux fronts.
              Il ya peut-être une opération russe d'envergure en prévision, et le blocage de ce pont réduira les transferts d'hommes et armements ukrainiens pour leurs défenses.
              Au vu de la carte, ce pont sera utile pour aller de l'avant.
            2. -2
              7 September 2025 17: 27
              The reason is the stupidity of the command, for some reason Ukrainians The Khaimars destroyed the Antonov bridge and the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station to force our group to retreat from the right bank of the Dnieper, and ours only damaged one bridge in the fourth year of the war.
    2. +2
      7 September 2025 09: 54
      As a result, the bridge was blown up by us.
      1. +4
        7 September 2025 10: 10
        Quote: Comrade Beria
        In the end, the bridge was blown up by us.

        Moreover, it was blown up with a carefully and skillfully planted land mine. Yes
        1. -5
          7 September 2025 10: 36
          It doesn't take much intelligence to blow up a bridge with a land mine.
          It is much more difficult to hit the same bridge.
          long-range precision missile
          at a great distance.
  14. +5
    7 September 2025 09: 52
    The moment of landing on the Kryukov Bridge. Watch without sound, because at such moments the khokhol forgets the language (or forgets the language) and switches to choice Russian swearing.

  15. +1
    7 September 2025 10: 02
    It is worth paying attention to the fact that this bridge is the only one in Kremenchuk across the Dnieper. Moreover, it is the only bridge across the Dnieper in the Poltava region. The nearest bridge is 120 km away in Cherkassy. Accordingly, the disabling of the Kryukovsky Bridge can significantly affect the military logistics of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

    Well, that's not quite true. The nearest bridge is 20 km away in Svetlovodsk. It's the dam of the Kremenchug hydroelectric power station. Both automobile and railway roads pass through it. However, these roads are not designed for intensive transit traffic. The railway was built as a road to support the construction of the hydroelectric power station and there was practically no transit traffic on it, although there are exits to the network on both the right and left banks. Automobiles are in better condition, but giant traffic jams in Svetlovodsk itself will be guaranteed, unless there is a restriction for ordinary residents.
    1. +2
      7 September 2025 10: 48
      Kremenchuk - locals write that there were about 20 strikes on the bridge. There were also strikes on the dam area in Svetlovodsk. Presumably, something else was flying towards the Kremenchuk Oil Refinery.
      1. +1
        7 September 2025 10: 56
        Nothing is written about Svetlovodsk yet. And in general, it is very difficult to destroy the transport crossing through the power plant itself, through the machine room (nearby). Powerful warheads with precise hits are needed. And the dam itself can only be destroyed by a nuclear explosion.
  16. -7
    7 September 2025 10: 08
    Judging by the video, the attack was carried out by Geranium.
    Serious damage is unlikely to occur.
  17. 0
    7 September 2025 10: 25
    We hit carefully, precisely. The trains have already gone around.
  18. +1
    7 September 2025 10: 30
    The bridge... is a fairly strong structure.
    A drawbridge/lift bridge... it's easier to damage the lifting mechanisms, but this is not a complete destruction of the bridge to the point of being impossible to use...
    In general, it’s worth waiting and seeing what happens next.
  19. +1
    7 September 2025 10: 41
    One Geranium won't destroy the bridge, but we have a lot of them! :) Either a "test run" or another subtle hint at a thick one... Time will tell.
    1. +1
      7 September 2025 12: 16
      Quote: Kill the fascist
      Is it a test of the pen?


      In our language, this is called "reconnaissance in force". Judging by the video of the landing, there is no anti-aircraft gun there, except for a three-story curse, "AT ALL". Let's see what happens tonight.
      1. 0
        7 September 2025 14: 17
        In the former Ukraine - now in Schweinereich there are quite a lot of water bodies and, accordingly, many important bridges, there are also other strategic objects that also need to be protected. And where can the Western jerks get so much air defense, especially given that for our soldiers, enemy air defense is a priority target.
  20. -1
    7 September 2025 10: 49
    This is nonsense. One attack, one "Geranka" will only peel off the old paint. Soviet bridges were built with a triple reserve, so - such an attack is complete nonsense. But it is already encouraging, as they wrote here, at least they looked beyond the "red lines"...
  21. -2
    7 September 2025 10: 52
    Well, what will the Witnesses of the Indestructibility of Bridges say now?
    The authorities have finally noticed that we are at war.
    1. +1
      7 September 2025 23: 01
      Quote from Scientist
      what will the Witnesses of the Indestructibility of Bridges say now

      It is much more interesting what the witnesses of the holy bridge destruction say, who suddenly saw the light and now insist that it is extremely difficult to destroy the bridge and it is almost impossible to do not only with Geraniums, but even with Iskanders. Only the mighty Khimars, and even then with difficulty, are capable of this, thanks to their high-tech precision, unattainable in Russian conditions.
  22. +2
    7 September 2025 10: 58
    Ukrainian terrorists from Maidan have concentrated their production and the production of enterprises with foreign capital in the west of Ukraine. It is necessary to methodically strike at them every day.
  23. -2
    7 September 2025 11: 15
    100 kg of explosives would knock the paint off a bridge.
    Most likely it's just a demonstration of something.
    It is clear why, but if a couple dozen of such demonstrators arrive and in a few days or hours to destroy repair crews and equipment, in this case there will be a result.
    1. +2
      7 September 2025 12: 54
      100 kg of explosives would knock the paint off a bridge.

      Apparently, this is a warning. And 100 kg of explosives is not so little. I remember in the SA during mine-blasting classes, 250 grams of explosives would break a railway rail. So, if a dozen Geraniums fly in and half of them hit the right nodes, the bridge will collapse. And even if there are a couple of hits every night, it will be problematic to drive across it.
      1. +1
        7 September 2025 14: 10
        Regarding 250 grams, I agree, but only if this charge is installed by skilled hands (simply putting it on the rail won’t work).
        And regarding daily arrivals, yes, discipline beats class, water wears away stone.
      2. 0
        7 September 2025 23: 16
        Based on the experience of the Second World War, the shock wave from the explosion of a 100 kg aerial bomb 10 meters from a medium tank turned it upside down.
        1. 0
          8 September 2025 09: 52
          The problem is not to bring down the bridge over the Dnieper. The problem is really of a humanitarian-social-political nature. There are bridges in Bryansk, over the Desna and over the Don and the Volga. And the Ukrainian Armed Forces can already reach them. They should have been brought down earlier. But now the only option is either a full-scale war with mobilization, which is unpopular to say the least, or the use of tactical nuclear weapons, which is also not acceptable. Let's wait until the Ukrainian Armed Forces have nuclear weapons. In that case, they won't really check and comply.
  24. 0
    7 September 2025 11: 36
    Our lawyers in power have finally understood the simple military wisdom - if you decide to attack, then you need to attack seriously. And in my opinion, the SVO started, as if it were an invitation to negotiations. The results of the negotiations are known. We negotiated so much that we cannot return the territory we liberated in 2022 in 2025.
  25. +1
    7 September 2025 11: 47
    It's high time to disrupt the supply of the Ukrainian Armed Forces to the left bank. We should also cut down in Kyiv and Cherkassy and it will be easier for our soldiers to advance.
  26. -4
    7 September 2025 14: 00
    Quote: Mars
    Why we, having Iskanders, Kinzhals, Geranis, Kalibrs, Kh-101, Tornado S, do not destroy the bridges across the Dnieper is unclear.

    Yes, everything is clear now.
    1. +3
      7 September 2025 14: 08
      Quote from Ponimatel
      Yes, everything is clear now.

      And what exactly is clear?
  27. -4
    7 September 2025 14: 10
    Quote: Paranoid62
    Quote from Ponimatel
    Yes, everything is clear now.

    And what exactly is clear?

    It is clear why they do not hit bridges and other similar things.
    1. +2
      7 September 2025 14: 39
      Quote from Ponimatel
      Quote: Paranoid62
      Quote from Ponimatel
      Yes, everything is clear now.

      And what exactly is clear?

      It is clear why they do not hit bridges and other similar things.

      More details, please, from this point on. Why exactly are they not hitting the bridges. We will leave similar points out of brackets for now Yes

      And master the "Reply" button, catching your comments addressed to no one knows who is a dubious pleasure.
  28. 0
    7 September 2025 14: 53
    Wouldn't it be easier to demolish these bridges with drone boats?
    1. +2
      7 September 2025 14: 59
      It's not easier. In Zaporozhye there is the first dam and locks, through which it is impossible to get through. And then more and more...
  29. -3
    7 September 2025 17: 10
    Quote: Paranoid62
    Why exactly aren't they hitting the bridges?

    They don't want to! Isn't it clear?! Or are you trying to provoke me into a criminal case? If they wanted to destroy the Ukrainian Armed Forces supply system, they would have destroyed it! And whoever talks about the impossibility of demolishing the bridges or their usefulness in a future offensive is either an idiot or a bastard!
  30. -4
    7 September 2025 19: 31
    Quote: Ivan Kuzmich
    why don't we destroy it? that means there is some reason why we can't do it

    And apparently this reason is not technological.
  31. -2
    7 September 2025 20: 32
    Has the Kremlin really decided to take off its white gloves in the fourth year of the war?
  32. -1
    7 September 2025 22: 02
    As for the Internet, we don’t have it either.
  33. -2
    7 September 2025 22: 32
    Many cities have the same situation, and we have it too. The bureaucratic fraternity can't steal enough, let alone think about the needs of the citizens, and even about the military stability of logistics. The pocket is more important. We are watching...
  34. -1
    8 September 2025 10: 35
    So relations with Azerbaijan have deteriorated and the Russian Armed Forces have started to "take out" the fuel port infrastructure. And with whom does Russia need to spoil relations in order to "take out" the bridges across the Dnieper?
  35. 0
    9 September 2025 05: 09
    Quote: Sergey3

    ...well, we don't have Zhukovs, Rokossovskys, but we do have Taburetkins...

    Oh, don't be modest! You have Zaluzhny, Syrsky, and most importantly --- Drapatiy.