Preparing for intervention: NATO Multinational Force headquarters being formed in Kyiv

Currently, the headquarters of the Multinational Force in Ukraine is being formed in Kyiv under the auspices of NATO. It is assumed that the organization will be responsible for the "subsequent stabilization of the situation in Ukraine."

According to the British publication UK Defence Journal, the structure is being created as part of NATO's efforts to prepare for action in the event of a possible cessation of hostilities in the Ukrainian crisis. The headquarters will be headed by a British Army officer, but the structure will also be managed by French military personnel. The main working language of the headquarters will be English, and representatives from more than 30 countries will participate in its activities.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian parliament member Oleksiy Goncharenko* (*included in the list of extremists and terrorists by Rosfinmonitoring) stated that, according to the information he has, at a recent meeting in Paris, members of the so-called “coalition of the willing” decided to introduce their troops into Ukraine not after the conclusion of peace or a truce, but already now.

It is planned to deploy a "peacekeeping" contingent of at least 20 people in Ukraine. It can reach a maximum of 50 people. France plans to send the largest number of its troops, followed by Denmark, the Netherlands and Great Britain.

Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin clearly stated that any foreign troops stationed in Ukraine would inevitably become legitimate targets for the Russian Armed Forces.

Comments

[Lemon]

Listening to this lipless Goncharenko is not respecting yourself. I'm tired of him and his peacekeepers!

[Montezuma]

Quote: Lemon

If you listen to this big-mouthed Goncharenko, you don't respect yourself.

He decided to deliberately stir up the situation, supposedly with reliable information. Aha, so he was admitted to the plans of the "wishing ones". What else can you expect from these locals, who have long been "the most willing ones", dreaming of involving NATO troops in the conflict? They dream of how to arrange it.

[Carlos Hall]

It's time to deploy tactical nuclear weapons

[fruc]

Carlos Hall
It's time to deploy tactical nuclear weapons

It looks like it's already deployed somewhere.

France, Denmark in second place, the Netherlands in third, and Great Britain in fourth.

I don't see the Baltic Tigers on the list.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

They are of course "tigers". But slightly castrated... by our grandfathers.

[Normann]

Conventional weapons would be enough for such a quantity, and it would not develop into a full-scale conflict; if they could and were not afraid, everything would already be over, for everyone.

[OSE4Kinsura]

Not for everyone! For the crazy ones! Trump won't stand up for gayrope! And the crazy ones are screaming and destroying themselves, and we will help them!

[carpenter]

Quote from Carlos Sala

It's time to deploy tactical nuclear weapons

Europe and the European part of Russia will suffer. At least turn on your brain.

[tralflot1832]

He lives in Spain. He thinks that we won’t reach Madrid, like there is no NATO in Spain.

[topol717]

Quote from Carlos Sala

It's time to deploy tactical nuclear weapons

Why? FABs and Gerani will cope with the destruction of this scum no worse. But I have a question, why do they need this? They can't help but understand that Putin will not allow them to deploy their troops in Ukraine? Then what is their goal? What are they trying to squeeze out of this war? Everyone sees that they are losing, as well as the fact that they have no chance of winning. So why do they continue this investment project, which is clearly unprofitable and will definitely not bring them any profit???? What do they want to achieve?

[Montezuma]

Quote from: topol717

Everyone sees that they are losing, and that they have no chance of winning.

This is the fact they do not want to acknowledge, believing that there is still the possibility of putting pressure on the Russian Federation in order to change the terms of the peace agreement in their favor.

Quote from: topol717

What do they want to achieve?

To achieve, if not a softening of the position of the Russian Federation, then to cause it the greatest damage, material and economic, while the military actions are ongoing. They have in their asset the complete readiness of Ze to continue implementing the motto - "to the last Ukrainian", while weapons and finances are arriving.
My personal opinion, which does not claim to be the only correct one.

[topol717]

Quote: Montezuma

To achieve, if not a softening of the Russian Federation’s position, then to inflict the greatest damage on it, material and economic, while military operations are ongoing.

These slogans are good for Channel One, but sensible people do not reason like that. We need to understand what their benefit is from continuing the war. Until we understand this, it will be difficult to defeat them. And what is their goal in causing damage to the Russian Federation, again in comparison with what? Now they are receiving even more damage than Russia and now it is not profitable for Germany and France to fight, but they stubbornly continue, so there is a benefit, but we do not know about it.

[Paranoid62]

Quote from: topol717

now it is not profitable for Germany and France to fight

And it is profitable for the EU leadership. Moreover, this is their only chance to stay at the trough.

There is no need to talk about "Germany", "France"... and one should not even think about it. The policies of these countries are determined by a very narrow circle of people, from the point of view of their interests and one should, IMHO, look at the situation

[alexoff]

We need to understand what they gain from continuing the war. Until we understand this, it will be difficult to defeat them.

What's the connection? Like until they figured out Hitler's true motives they retreated, but on the Volga they suddenly understood? In a fight, they look for the enemy's vulnerable spots and hit them, and don't arrange psychoanalysis sessions

[Tatyana]

Quote from: topol717

Quote from Carlos Sala
It's time to deploy tactical nuclear weapons
Why? FABs and Geranis will cope with the destruction of this scum no worse. But I have a question, why do they need it?

The leaders of all these countries in Ukraine either have their own personal business, or they profit from kickbacks from the military-industrial complex and arms dealers in the US proxy war against Russia. That is, as they say, for them, in principle, there is nothing sacred except their personal business and their unbridled profit from the war at the expense of their protégés.

For example, Macron has his own personal business in Odessa. And to preserve it, Macron is trying to send his Frenchmen and mercenaries from the French Armed Forces to the war with Russia to be slaughtered, first of all, in Odessa! And also in WWI, the French directory in Ukraine also does not give Macron any peace in terms of the colonial possibilities of robbing Ukraine by France to once again profit from the wealth of the Russians on the historical lands of the Russian Empire.

History reference
The government of the unrecognized Ukrainian republic (Directory) in February 1919 left no doubt about its intentions:

"The Directory places itself under the protection of France and asks the representatives of France to take over the management of Ukraine in the areas of military, diplomatic, political, financial, economic and judicial matters for the entire time that the war with the Bolsheviks continues."

On its fronts Ukrainian nationalists experienced a growing need for weapons, volunteers and money. Paris entered into negotiations with Kyiv, which took place in Odessa, occupied by the French military, promising supplies.
A meeting between the head of the French occupation contingent, General Philippe d'Anselme, and the Ukrainian dictator Symon Petliura was scheduled for March 1919 at the Birzula station. It was not long before the Franco-Ukrainian agreement - but Paris suddenly pulled out of the game, declaring a complete evacuation.
Starting from April 4, the French began to leave Odessa and, voluntarily abandoning the bridgehead, ceased participation in the Russian Civil War.
See details - https://tass.ru/obschestvo/20433863?ysclid=mf8qf8oay1496734051

Now everything is very similar in Ukraine as it was then, except that Macron already has his own personal business in Odessa

[jack no]

"" " What do you mean by "continued"?
Un répit, Starmer et Manuléon sont en grande difficulté chez eux.
Le Danemark, veut faire plaisir à Trump, le Groenland, en toile de fond.
Quand au Pays-Bas, Rutte est hollandais.
This is a future ahead.
Que les troupes occidentales aient un sac en plastique noir et une étiquette dans le paquetage.
Ca facilitera l'identification dans les tranchés ou sur les lieux de concentrations explosés et à la morgue.
Mais, à mon avis, ce n'est que de la propagande.

[lutikovvn]

Quote from: topol717

Quote from Carlos Sala

It's time to deploy tactical nuclear weapons

Why? FABs and Gerani will cope with the destruction of this scum no worse. But I have a question, why do they need this? They can't help but understand that Putin will not allow them to deploy their troops in Ukraine? Then what is their goal? What are they trying to squeeze out of this war? Everyone sees that they are losing, as well as the fact that they have no chance of winning. So why do they continue this investment project, which is clearly unprofitable and will definitely not bring them any profit???? What do they want to achieve?

Their goal is to bring Russia to its knees by showing it its "proper" (in their opinion) place, the "gas stations" of the world and Europe. Their hopes are connected with the fact that Russia in previous years was too accommodating in its policy and their hopes are for our corrupt "elites".

[SEVERIN]

Provocateurs need to be put up against the wall, and certainly not trusted with nuclear weapons.

[Reserve officer]

Is European integration being replaced by Eurooccupation?

[fruc]

In Kyiv, under the auspices of NATO, the headquarters of the Multinational Force is being formed

The main thing is that they don’t forget to include bagpipers and a military orchestra for various rituals, to make it more fun.

[Revolver]

Quote: frruc

Let them not forget to include bagpipers and a military orchestra for various rituals

And other specialists in providing funeral services - they may very well be needed.

[hagen]

Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin clearly stated that any foreign troops stationed in Ukraine would inevitably become legitimate targets for the Russian Armed Forces.

Accordingly, any form of participation of these foreign troops in military actions is automatically equated to a declaration of war on the Russian Federation. Further, according to the text of the doctrine and the legislation on the defense of the Russian Federation.... I think that experts in the governments of the EU countries understand the consequences of these actions very well, and if their advice is not accepted, they will run away in different directions. The reaction of these people must be monitored. It can be used to judge who will be the first to decide to commit suicide.

[carpenter]

Quote: Hagen

Accordingly, any form of participation of these foreign troops in military operations is automatically equated to a declaration of war on the Russian Federation.

Any country whose army has crossed its borders is considered to have begun hostilities and a state of war.
A declaration of war, even if not accompanied by military action, entails the beginning of a legal state of war. ... A theatre of military operations is the territory in which the armed forces of the belligerents actually conduct military action.

[Neo-9947]

.

Quote: carpenter

Any country whose army has crossed its borders is considered to have begun hostilities and a state of war.

Wait a second. What if the army came by invitation? Like the Russian Armed Forces in Syria.
The Ukrainians invite armies of other countries to join them, that's understandable. It would seem legal and they have the right, as a formally independent state that is a member of the UN.
But Russia categorically objects to the right of the strong. There are no other "legal" justifications for this objection. It is useless to argue with this fact.

Hence the conclusion.
The troops brought in do not have a UN mandate for a peacekeeping operation, and since the Russian Federation is conducting a military operation in Ukraine, by right of the strong, this means that these troops represent an absolutely legitimate target for the Russian Armed Forces.
Explain this to the unreasonable "wants"...
get hit in the insolent French face with a tarpaulin boot.

[Brturin]

Quote: Neo-9947

But Russia categorically objects to the right of the strong. There are no other "legal" justifications for this objection. It is useless to argue with this fact.

Regarding the legal justifications, the question is not so clear-cut - this has been discussed more than once, most recently in Lavrov's interview on 19/08/25 - "no one has the right to strengthen their security at the expense of others... but also documents signed at the highest level."

One of these root causes is Russia's security problems. It is connected with the fact that for decades the commitments we made to prevent NATO's expansion to the east have been consistently and flagrantly violated. Russian President V.V. Putin has noted several times that after these promises there have been five waves of the alliance's expansion. When they say that this was promised orally, there is nothing of the sort. This was promised on paper in the form of political declarations signed at the highest level at the OSCE summits in Istanbul in 1999 and in Astana in 2010. They said that security is indivisible, no one has the right to strengthen their security at the expense of others. NATO did exactly this. No one, including a country or an organization, has the right to claim dominance in the OSCE space. They did everything exactly the opposite. It is the devil's work to say that something was said orally. Firstly, a word is not a sparrow. Secondly, there is not only documentary evidence of the facts of the negotiations, but also documents signed at the highest level. https://www.mid.ru/ru/press_service/minister_speeches/2041939/

[Neo-9947]

What's there to remember, who was it that chattered into the ears of the drunk EBN.
And even if a piece of paper is found, it's worthless. Because whoever is strong dictates the rules.
Forget all this and throw it in the trash. Live in the present day.

But in reality, the Russian Federation is conducting a joint military operation. And those who disagree can go to hell.
If anyone wants to agree on something, the Russian Federation will listen.

[hagen]

Quote: Neo-9947

But Russia categorically objects on the grounds of the right of the strong. There are no other "legal" justifications for this objection.

The main reason for the onset of a state of war will be the fact of entering into direct armed confrontation of the armed forces of a foreign state (i.e. a state institution, at the will of the legitimate political leadership of this state) with the armed forces of Russia. No "rights of force". This is not our "method".

[Vlad Gor]

It's easier to talk than to carry sacks. The tongue will take you to Kyiv, so they say. But in reality, it's been four years of chatter, and Kyiv is oh so far away, it's not even in sight yet.
In order to avoid NATO intervention, it is necessary to legally establish that Ukraine is Russian territory. We need a law that will state that the entire territory of Ukraine, within the 1975 borders, is an integral part of Russia. Now the whole of Ukraine is a "gray zone", no man's land, a so-called state that does not have fixed borders in the UN. A state formed as a result of a criminal offense. NATO will introduce troops and someone thinks that the Kremlin will start a war with NATO. What naivety or misunderstanding. What is the SVO in Ukraine now, no one knows, no one knows the goals of the SVO and strategy. Everyone refers to the media, to someone who said something. There is a civil war in Ukraine, the introduction of NATO troops is an occupation. It may happen that the Maidanites will start a war with NATO, what next. NATO is behaving cautiously, many in the world will not like the introduction of troops.

[hagen]

Quote: Vlad Gor

To prevent NATO intervention, it is necessary to legally establish that Ukraine is Russian territory.

A legally illiterate statement. Our law is limited by the territory of our state, which we have recognized, the citizenship of the victims and the legitimate interests of the Russian Federation. It will be null and void on the territory of any other state, unless it is approved by an interstate agreement. The probability of this happening with Ukraine today is 0.

[Vlad Gor]

In terms of legal basis, there is a very good example, Venezuela. It is the answer to literacy.
Take an example from China, Great Britain, Venezuela, Argentina, Japan, etc., there are many such countries in the world, many whose laws are not limited to the territory of their recognized state. You claim that they are all legally illiterate.
The majority and you too recognize the "new states" formed in the post-Soviet space as legal and legitimate. Answer. Can a subject be legal and legitimate if it was formed by criminal means, in violation of the laws and the Constitution of the country.
A conspiracy of criminals is not legitimacy or legality.
You know that a coup d'etat is a criminal offense with no statute of limitations.

[hagen]

Quote: Vlad Gor

Can a subject be legal and legitimate if it was formed through criminal means, in violation of the laws and the Constitution of the country?

The entities you are talking about were formed as a result of referendums. And since "...the bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in Ukraine is the people...", the event is completely legal and complies with the principles of the UN Charter. What do you dislike about this process...? The current regime in Ukraine has created many precedents that violate the constitution. The constitution itself is very contradictory. So the separation of two territories that have been defending themselves for 8 years is completely legal, including from the point of view of international law. But the legality of the regime established in 2014 raises a lot of questions. There really is a "conspiracy of criminals" there.

Quote: Vlad Gor

You know that a coup d'etat is a criminal offense with no statute of limitations.

The concept of "coup" is absent from the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. There is "seizure of power", "retention of power". It is not entirely clear what you mean. The main thing is - a coup in which country? This is important for determining the law that you want to describe.....

[Vlad Gor]

A coup d'état (abbreviated as coup d'état) is a violent seizure of power in a state, inevitably carried out in violation of the constitutional and legal norms in force at the time of the action, usually with the use of force to seize the centers of government of the state and to carry out physical isolation (arrest or liquidation) of its current leaders.
All "new states" were formed on the territory of the former Soviet Union. The Belovezh Accords were organized and signed by persons who had no authority. The location itself was chosen 7,5 km from the Polish border, taking into account that in case of unfavorable events it would be possible to escape to Poland.
The withdrawal of the Republic of Ukraine from the USSR was possible only with a positive decision received at the USSR Referendum and the implementation of the USSR Law of April 3, 1990 No. 1409-I “On the procedure for resolving issues related to the withdrawal of a union republic from the USSR”.
The USSR Constitution of 1977 was adopted by all the peoples of the USSR, and only the entire people of the USSR could give permission for Ukraine to leave the USSR.
The withdrawal of Ukraine without a national referendum in the USSR and failure to comply with the law of April 3, 1990 No. 1409-I is a criminal offense that has no statute of limitations.
You will declare that such a state as the Soviet Union no longer exists, which means that there is no crime and no criminals. All "new states" are legitimate and lawful on the basis of referendums held on the territories of these "new states".
It doesn't tell you anything, there is no body, no crime.

[hagen]

Quote: Vlad Gor

The USSR Constitution of 1977 was adopted by all the peoples of the USSR, and only the entire people of the USSR could give permission for Ukraine to leave the USSR.

So, do you want the USSR to be recognized again? You are a dreamer... In your search for truth, you must take into account the current realities. Otherwise, you will end up in a mental hospital.

[Vlad Gor]

Thank you for not insulting me. Fantasies are about the future, the past is just History.
Restoring the USSR is not possible, and not necessary. All people living in the post-Soviet space have changed, for the worse. The classes of workers and peasants, as such, are absent, there are not even "trade unions". Regarding my fantasies, as you indicated, I will say. There are books and articles written long ago on the development of a stable state. What is needed and what parameters should a subject have in order to become a state with a future. There are many parameters. For example, the USA and China fall under this criterion. I will cite one that few people know about and do not pay attention to.
There is such a parameter as "territory of comfortable living", so in the Russian Federation only 16% +-1 (most of the territory is permafrost, swamps, taiga, mountains, hills, cold zone) is comfortable for living, in Ukraine 83% (-5, +1), in Belarus 84% ​​(-4, +0). Only by this parameter it is necessary to return the republics to the Fatherland. In the Russian Federation there is very little land where it is good to live, although the area of ​​the country is large. In the USA 65-75%, in Alaska the climate is better than in Chukotka.
For sustainable independent development, a state must have at least 200 million people.
I wrote this to you so that the other person could understand.

[LMN]

Country of unafraid idiots (s)

[fruc]

LMN
Maxim) The Country of Unafraid Idiots (c)

It is you, sir, who gave everyone minuses, that’s not good.

[LMN]

Quote: frruc

LMN
Maxim) The Country of Unafraid Idiots (c)

It is you, sir, who gave everyone minuses, that’s not good.

What are you talking about?!

[fruc]

LMN
What are you talking about?!

Well, if it wasn't you, then I apologize.

[carpenter]

Quote: frruc

LMN
Maxim) The Country of Unafraid Idiots (c)

It is you, sir, who gave everyone minuses, that’s not good.

I wonder, what do you think about this? Where is the evidence that LMN Maxim is downvoting?
It’s somehow unpleasant to read this on our website.

[fruc]

carpenter
Where is the evidence that LMN Maxim is downvoting?
It’s somehow unpleasant to read this on our website.

I am not an investigator to present evidence, I can only assume. And what did you read that was so unpleasant?

[carpenter]

Quote: frruc

I am not an investigator to present evidence, but only to make assumptions.

Make assumptions silently, now you have a plus.

[fruc]

carpenter
Make assumptions silently, now you have a plus.

Well, thank you, dear sir. You have a kind soul.

[carpenter]

Quote: frruc

Well, thank you, dear sir. You have a kind soul.

I just think about it occasionally.

[fruc]

carpenter
I just think about it occasionally.

What's good about the army is that you don't have to think about it.

[carpenter]

Quote: frruc

What's good about the army is that you don't have to think about it.

When I had to work in Africa at the time, I had to think.

[Montezuma]

Quote: frruc

It is you, sir, who gave everyone minuses, that’s not good.

What eyesight you have! I have never been able to see who is giving minuses (nor pluses, by the way).

[K-50]

Currently, the headquarters of the Multinational Force in Ukraine is being formed in Kyiv under the auspices of NATO. It is assumed that the organization will be responsible for the "subsequent stabilization of the situation in Ukraine."

Treat them with "nuts", drop a full bag near them, in a heap, so that no one has time to escape. Well, and "sow" nearby as well.
Whatever remains of Kuev is not our headache. Tear it all down to dust, so that they know that Russia will not tolerate anyone on its Outskirts, especially troops under any signboard. After all, the SVO was started in order to close the loophole for the West to our land.

[rocket757]

So, predicting WHAT WILL HAPPEN is an uncertain matter...

[carpenter]

Quote: rocket757

So, predicting WHAT WILL HAPPEN is an uncertain matter...

If in some country, the top starts talking about war, then the common people start talking about it, and then the homeless, then that country will fight. Any escalation of military actions leads to war.

[rocket757]

Are there many countries in Europe where everyone, even the homeless, talk about war and want to fight?
Botovnya, around and about, there's enough of that... determination to go and die, in the name of and for... something else.
In general, uncertainty...

[Brturin]

Quote: rocket757

it was something vague...

Former MFA of Ukraine

When asked by a journalist from the German publication Spiegel whether he considered the presence of European troops on Ukrainian territory possible, Kuleba said that his answer depended on what was meant by that. "European combat units? No. European peacekeepers? No," Kuleba said, adding ironically that the presence was possible only "simply as a message of support," to "cover their backs, although this is not really the case," in order to "at least pretend." https://1prime.ru/20250829/kuleba-861436959.html

and what is this message of support

[rocket757]

And really, what does that mean?
Try to figure out what to make of this stream of contradictory statements, and it’s too early to talk about intentions and decisions made.

[Brturin]

as an option in the photo at the beginning of the article - "message of support" in the form of a military orchestra. But... figure it out... politics is usually compared to chess, but here it looks more like a card game... what trump cards the Europeans have is a question, but they constantly raise the stakes, bluff, don't bluff, but it is almost impossible to figure it out in such a game... there is a strategic goal, but plans on how to achieve it require revision, and for now the strategy is who blinks first

[spectr]

At a recent meeting in Paris, members of the so-called “coalition of the willing” decided to introduce their troops into Ukraine not after the conclusion of peace or a truce, but now.

If this happens, then hit them. In principle, nothing will change from this. These countries are already participating in the conflict. And so they will announce it officially and that's it.

[osp]

We won't be able to do this with conventional weapons.
If they use hundreds of combat aircraft, their own air defense systems, missiles, all types of communications and reconnaissance systems where NATO has total superiority.
Perhaps Russia will limit itself to tactical nuclear strikes against concentrations of their troops and aircraft on Ukrainian territory.

[spectr]

That's why they are urgently stamping out hazelnuts now. If the situation starts to escalate, the first warning blow will most likely be dealt by them.

[HAM]

It's not for nothing that the Fritzes ordered mobile crematoria, and the Frogs are transferring medicine "to a war footing"... they decided. But they understand WHAT will happen... they prepare in advance. The Germans have more realistic thoughts.

[carpenter]

Quote: HAM

The Germans have more realistic thoughts.

The idea has been the same for 800 years: "Drang nach Osten".

[Dart]

And here again is a "convenient" excuse...

[carpenter]

The main working language of the headquarters will be English.

And what about the language, Ukraine left the union for it, and here it is English. The end of mother.

[drags33]

As I understand it, it is not the former Ukraine that is going to the EU, but the EU that is going to the former Ukraine? Well, this reshuffle could be fatal for both the former Ukraine and the EU!

[Andobor]

Until the end of hostilities, no one will introduce troops, and the end of hostilities is possible only with the refusal to introduce any troops; the introduction of foreign troops is a continuation of hostilities.

[cytadell]

Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin clearly stated that any foreign troops stationed in Ukraine would inevitably become legitimate targets for the Russian Armed Forces.

In itself

clearly marked

must be backed up by action, otherwise these are empty words. I would prepare to meet the guests so thoroughly that the answer would seem to them something akin to a nuclear strike. So that the conclusion would be obvious that "we came here in vain - the Russians don't joke". So that the previous strikes would seem like a child's song. So that the destruction of all "willing" would be maximal.
But there is one very subtle point I would like to mention. The heart of the hydra is in Britain. This beast understands that with the deaths of all those who come to the outskirts, hatred will be sown among the peoples who will mourn them, hatred towards Russia. This is precisely what they are counting on - they are hitting for sure. Perhaps it would be worth wiping them off the face of the earth and this would be the lesser evil, in order not to give birth to a greater evil, to which they are pushing our continent.

[alexoff]

In my opinion, the best answer would be a second Vietnam for the frogs. Like - come in, you are welcome, and then suddenly Kovpak's fighters with drones surrounded the barracks and drove a mined truck to the entrance. So that it would also be like in Lebanon, where the French were instantly blown out of the country
But it’s unlikely that our special services are able to pull off something like that now.

[osp]

Do you understand that Moscow and several other megacities in the European part of Russia will be subject to retaliatory nuclear strikes from British submarines?
These are dozens of missiles, 150-180 charges.
Is it worth it?
That the Chinese and Japanese, taking advantage of this, will divide our Far East and Siberia, where there is almost no population left.

[cytadell]

Well, I didn't mean a nuclear strike specifically. I meant an impact comparable in effect.

[Maks1995]

Ha. In the morning an article - the Ukies said no to foreign contingents. In the evening - they are already forming their headquarters.

You can't trust anyone. Anonymous, PR people and previously unknown strange foreign media - you can

[Revolver]

Hey, pillars of Russian business! Is anyone patriotic enough to institute a reward for the scalp of a "peacekeeper"?

[tralflot1832]

Nagant, if in the photo it is not a new anti-tank grenade launcher - then it is bagpipes. And if bagpipes then it must be a skirt. "We will kill you all" Tolstoy, but not Leo.

[lynnot]

They must have gathered to protect their investments.

[Aleksandr58]

Smash them to dust along with their headquarters! Not a single Western invader should leave alive.

[Salimi from Iran]

NATO will definitely enter Ukraine and will definitely be destroyed there (I am not saying this on my own behalf, but from the words of the prophetic brothers, their predictions are usually true).

[Carlos Hall]

Deploy tactical nuclear weapons preemptively before the cure becomes worse than the disease.

[Paranoid62]

Quote from Carlos Sala

Deploy tactical nukes preemptively before the cure becomes worse than the disease

Are you a doctor? Do you take care of your health?

[Vladimirius]

they have already formed the Crimean government and many other things, they like to blow everything up, but in the end, everywhere and constantly, it's a dud

[Or me]

They'll arrive faster and leave faster in plastic.

At a recent meeting in Paris, members of the so-called “coalition of the willing” decided to introduce their troops into Ukraine not after the conclusion of peace or a truce, but now.

[osp]

Quote: Normann

Conventional weapons would be enough for such a quantity, and it would not develop into a full-scale conflict; if they could and were not afraid, everything would already be over, for everyone.

Are you serious when you write about conventional weapons?
Russia has been unable to defeat this Ukraine with the remnants of Soviet aviation for almost 4 years.
So, the UK alone will have 7-8 deployed AWACS aircraft, that is, more than Russia!
Only France, Germany, and Great Britain will be able to deploy 200-250 modern tactical aircraft in this theater of operations.
These are thousands of cruise missiles, hundreds of anti-ship and anti-radar missiles. Thousands of glide bombs.
Total superiority in communications and space reconnaissance.
How can we defeat this with conventional weapons?
When Ukrainian drones the size of Rust's Cessna are already flying in by the dozens to oil refineries in Ryazan, Samara and other cities in the European part of Russia.

[Nastia makarova]

What kind of planes if there will be infantry troops

[osp]

Quote: Lynnot

They must have gathered to protect their investments.

Over the past 30 years, the West has invested a huge amount of money and resources into this quasi-formation.
No one will give us anything there just like that. Especially considering how much we've invested in the last 4 years.

[osp]

Quote: Nagan

Hey, pillars of Russian business! Is anyone patriotic enough to institute a reward for the scalp of a "peacekeeper"?

What peacemaker?
There we are talking about the deployment of combat aircraft, ships, air defense systems and tactical missiles already.
And only then ground troops.

[Yaro Polk]

They will simply be destroyed with Iskanders.

[osp]

Quote: carpenter

Quote from Carlos Sala

It's time to deploy tactical nuclear weapons

Europe and the European part of Russia will suffer. At least turn on your brain.

Tactical nuclear strikes on NATO troop concentrations on Ukrainian territory are one thing.
Russia will probably be able to take such a step when it becomes clear that we cannot defeat them there with conventional weapons - the territory is huge and the countries are very significant in military terms.
But no one will be the first to launch nuclear strikes on the territory of NATO nuclear countries - Moscow and the entire European part of Russia will immediately find themselves under the threat of a retaliatory nuclear strike from their SSBNs.

[osp]

From the news feed:
"Poland and Romania, which border Ukraine, rule out sending their own troops, but are ready to help with transport and logistics."
Quite expected. These countries do not have the level of armies to conduct operations on such a vast territory.
In Europe, only a couple of NATO countries have such capabilities.
It is logical that, being nuclear states, they can “draw up” some security guarantees for Ukraine.
At least purely theoretically.
Because the "guarantees" from Luxembourg, Estonia, Switzerland will be worth nothing - just a piece of paper.

[Nastia makarova]

Poland is the second army after Turkey and France and England are nothing

[torbas41]

If they really do introduce their troops into Ukraine, and we again express extreme concern, then the West’s next step will be a nuclear strike, but this time on our decision-making centers.

[gribanov.c]

Let's throw some hazelnuts at them, what's wrong with that, this isn't a NATO country

[Enotovich]

In fact, the news is not particularly cheerful.

[ergh081]

Looking at the photo for the article, I recall a humorous one: "...the mother-in-law plays the Scottish bagpipes - blows into Esmarch's mug."

[nordscout]

The statement by Alexey Goncharenko, perhaps, and probably should be perceived as provocative - emotional, to raise the "fighting spirit" of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the population of Ukroreikh... The headquarters of the Multinational Forces, this is not yet the NATO forces themselves... The commentary of our Supreme, regarding the introduction of the multinational armed forces of NATO into Ukroreikh will "allow" the leaders of these armed forces to return to the feeling of "healthy arrogance", so characteristic of biological individuals... In short, in two words: "To promise to marry, does not mean to marry"... Something like that...

[romandostalo]

The organization is expected to be responsible for “the subsequent stabilization of the situation in Ukraine.”
She won't be held responsible for anything. Another attempt to divide the bear's skin.

[Azzzwer]

Well, we'll see)))

[Dimy4]

Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin clearly stated that any foreign troops stationed in Ukraine would inevitably become legitimate targets for the Russian Armed Forces.

Oh, yes, it meant a lot of things.