Domestic BECs: progress and results

11 339 46
Domestic BECs: progress and results
Mine countermeasure boat "Scanda". Photo Telegram / BMPD


One of the promising and promising areas in the field of military technology is unmanned boats. Light and medium surface platforms with remote or autonomous control are capable of solving a variety of tasks in the interests of fleet. Russian industry became interested in this topic several years ago, and has developed a number of similar projects to date. Some of the new models have reached serial production and entered service.



Promising direction


The first domestic concepts of unmanned boats (UBC) for one purpose or another appeared quite a long time ago. However, only in recent years has this direction been developed. Real projects have appeared that have led, at a minimum, to the construction and testing of experimental equipment.

At the end of the 12700s, the Almaz Central Marine Design Bureau developed the Skanda BEK. It was built on the basis of a serial motor boat and equipped with equipment for searching for sea mines. Serial boats of this type are used to equip mine defense ships of Project XNUMX Alexandrite.

At the military-technical forum "Army-2022" another domestic unmanned aerial vehicle called "Vizir-700" was shown for the first time. It was developed by the holding company "Kingisepp Machine-Building Plant" (KMZ) and the St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University taking into account the new requirements of the army and other customers.


Early version of the BEK "Vizir". Photo "KMZ"

The experimental boat presented at the exhibition had a remote and autonomous control system. Hydrographic equipment was installed on it, and it was also reported that it could use other loads, including military ones.

Later, KMZ and its subcontractors carried out several upgrades of the existing boat. Now we are talking about a whole series of BEKs with the general name "Vizir". Since 2023, these products have been manufactured in small series. It was reported that the equipment would be delivered to the Ministry of Defense for testing and subsequent operation.

Last year, at the Fleet-2024 exhibition, another new domestic development was shown for the first time. The Orkan/Zephyr BEC from the Si Project company is similar in size and main characteristics to the Vizir, but differs in a number of features and capabilities.

According to known data, "Orkan" has gone into production and is being supplied to the armed forces. In addition, the possibility of using such equipment by units of the Ministry of Emergency Situations was demonstrated.


Multipurpose boat "Katran". Photo by CBST

Several versions of modern UAVs have been proposed in recent years by the Design Bureau "Center for Unmanned Systems". Boats under the general name "Murena" are similar to other domestic developments and are also intended to solve a wide range of tasks by installing one or another equipment.

By now, several domestic organizations have joined the process of developing military-purpose BECs. Both large enterprises and small groups of enthusiasts offer their projects of this kind. They implement similar concepts, but use different solutions that yield certain results.

It is obvious that the development of the BEK theme will continue. In the near future, new boats with different features and capabilities should appear. New organizations with their original ideas will be able to join these processes.

Technical solutions


Most of the domestic BECs presented in recent years belong to the same class. In terms of technical appearance or characteristics, they are similar to each other, but there are also significant differences. All this shows the current capabilities of the industry and the needs of potential customers.

"Skanda", "Vizir", "Orkan", etc. are boats several meters long with a displacement of no more than 1,5-2 tons. To speed up development and simplify production, they were created on the basis of serial models with the preservation of key units. Thus, hulls, propulsion systems, some common systems, etc. were borrowed.


Testing one of the domestic BEKs in the Special Operations area, May 2024. The boat is moving towards a coastal target. Photo Telegram / "Tam za tomamy"

The boats are equipped with outboard motors of available models. With their help, the speed of up to 40-45 knots is achieved. The cruising range can exceed 100-120 nautical miles. Seaworthiness is normal for equipment of such size and design.

The BECs receive a set of electronics necessary for driving and performing assigned tasks. First of all, they are equipped with a remote control system, optical-electronic means, radio stations and navigation devices. Full-fledged information and control systems are offered, such as the Murena product for the Vizir boats.

All BECs have the ability to be remotely controlled from the operator station. The boat transmits a video signal and telemetry to the station in real time and receives commands from it. Automation algorithms for movement along a given route, reaction to external factors, etc. are also being developed and implemented. In the foreseeable future, the degree of automation will increase.

The boats can carry different payloads to perform certain tasks. Thus, the standard optics allow reconnaissance and search for surface or air objects. It is proposed to install compact radars with the same function. Some of the demonstrated BEKs received hydroacoustic equipment for searching for underwater targets, mapping the bottom, etc.

Given their size, modern domestic BEKs can carry full-fledged combat modules with a barrel or rocket weapons. It is also possible to use the boat as a disposable strike vehicle. Existing platforms can carry a 500-600 kg explosive charge and deliver it to the target with high accuracy.


Ukrainian reconnaissance ship in the lens of the Russian BEK. Photo by the Russian Ministry of Defense

Practical experience


According to known data, some of the domestic BEKs entered the Special Operation zone no later than the first months of 2024. Single samples and pre-production lots of equipment were intended for military testing and design development in real-life conditions.

Various episodes of boat use in the Black Sea and on the Dnieper River were reported. They were used to conduct reconnaissance of enemy positions and solve other auxiliary tasks. In addition, several BEKs were used in a kamikaze configuration to destroy coastal targets.

The boats showed their best side and received good reviews. In this regard, the Ministry of Defense decided to purchase some of the available models. However, it is still unknown which BEKs were adopted for service, in what quantities they are being purchased and to which units they are being delivered.

On August 28, the Ministry of Defense reported the largest success of domestic BEKs to date. A high-speed boat of an unnamed type entered the mouth of the Danube River and hit the medium-sized reconnaissance ship Simferopol from the Ukrainian Navy. After the only kamikaze boat was blown up, the ship sank and blocked an important fairway.


The moment of the Simferopol's defeat. Photo by the Russian Ministry of Defense

It is obvious that the use of the available BEKs continues. With their help, they can monitor the situation and conduct reconnaissance in the necessary waters. New strikes on the remaining ships or vessels of the enemy, as well as on its coastal infrastructure, should also be expected.

Useful experience


The last few years have shown the high potential of unmanned and crewless systems of various classes. In this regard, the Russian industry, represented by various organizations, began developing such equipment and has now presented a number of different UAVs.

Some of the new developments were tested at sea ranges, and then took part in the Special Operation and confirmed the calculated characteristics. These boats perform real tasks and help to gain experience. It will be useful in creating the next generation of UAVs, which may appear in the very near future.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 12
    10 September 2025 05: 10
    The work on creating domestic BEKs is going slowly, very slowly. Although their sizes allow them to be manufactured in hundreds if not thousands. Which will allow navigation to the ports of Ukraine on the Black Sea to be completely stopped.
    1. + 18
      10 September 2025 05: 21
      Quote: V.
      This will completely stop navigation to Ukrainian ports on the Black Sea.

      You might think that without BEK it is impossible. Anti-ship missiles and mining were invented long ago. It's just that for some people it is still not a war, but a strange military operation.
      1. +3
        10 September 2025 07: 03
        How long and slowly the process of realizing the primacy of unmanned/unmanned systems in modern combat operations is going. It was clear long ago that the time of battleships, destroyers, frigates, in puddles like the Baltic and Black Sea, has passed.
      2. 0
        11 September 2025 16: 54
        You might think that without BEC this is impossible.

        In modern conditions - practically none. There is a situation when a fleet that does not have a ship composition has a local superiority at sea over a fleet that had ships of the 1st and 2nd ranks, carriers of cruise missiles and submarines.
        1. 0
          12 September 2025 03: 09
          Quote: Marlin
          In modern conditions - practically none. There is a situation when a fleet that does not have a ship composition has a local superiority at sea over a fleet that had ships of the 1st and 2nd ranks, carriers of cruise missiles and submarines.

          Nonsense. The reason for this is the illiterate and irresponsible leadership of the second fleet. It did not organize any systematic work of the fleet's various forces, nor analyze intelligence data, and especially did not re-arm its ships.
          The BEK and UAVs, and even the Houthis' anti-ship missiles were unable to hit the ships of Western countries - for example, about the system's work and armament...
  2. +5
    10 September 2025 05: 15
    Things don't go beyond exhibitions.
    1. +2
      10 September 2025 18: 01
      Let me add: ...and Parades! hi stop
  3. +1
    10 September 2025 05: 20
    Quote: mag nit
    Things don't go beyond exhibitions

    It looks like yes. And we need thousands of them!
    1. -10
      10 September 2025 08: 34
      against whom thousands?)))))))))
      1. +3
        10 September 2025 09: 46
        They'll find someone to send it to Venezuela against
        1. 0
          10 September 2025 17: 06
          The Houthis were given nothing!!! and they will definitely chicken out...
      2. +1
        11 September 2025 15: 40
        Quote: Nastia Makarova
        against whom thousands?)))))))))

        These same BEKs can be loaded onto any dry cargo ship, or BMRT - fishing seiner. The ocean is big... Targets will be found.
    2. +3
      10 September 2025 10: 55
      as an option to install weapons on our BEK, there are a lot of options: 324-mm torpedoes from the PTZ Paket, FPV drones, Kornet ATGM, LMUR missiles
  4. +4
    10 September 2025 05: 22
    Quote: V.
    The work on creating domestic BECs is going slowly, very slowly. Although their sizes allow them to be manufactured in hundreds if not thousands

    And who can be entrusted with their creation?
    Private individuals and amateurs will be prohibited from making them...for fear that something might happen...just like with UAVs.
    Government structures are extremely sluggish and slow, and there is a risk that the story of Rusnano with its Chubasov-style advanced technologies will repeat itself.
    I wonder if it is possible to use BECs against the BECs themselves.
    Send a similar BEC with the appropriate weapons and equipment to the attacking BEC.
    1. -1
      10 September 2025 07: 33
      Quote: The same Lech
      Quote: V.
      The work on creating domestic BECs is going slowly, very slowly. Although their sizes allow them to be manufactured in hundreds if not thousands

      And who can be entrusted with their creation?
      Private individuals and amateurs will be prohibited from making them...for fear that something might happen...just like with UAVs.
      Government structures are extremely sluggish and slow, and there is a risk that the story of Rusnano with its Chubasov-style advanced technologies will repeat itself.
      I wonder if it is possible to use BECs against the BECs themselves.
      Send a similar BEC with the appropriate weapons and equipment to the attacking BEC.

      BEKs with a 12,7 mm machine gun will easily shoot down Ukrainian BEKs. All that's left is for someone to make them. And that's a fat, tasty embezzlement of budget funds.
      1. +3
        10 September 2025 09: 51
        Here's the news about who makes our unmanned boats
        https://er.ru/activity/news/vladimir-yakushev-predstavil-iniciativy-po-razvitiyu-voennyh-i-dvojnyh-tehnologij-na-baze-centra-bespilotnyh-sistem
        I think there will be no questions as to why they are made one every six months. lol
        1. 0
          10 September 2025 17: 09
          you made me laugh! That's why it's called "the party of crooks and thieves")))
      2. +3
        10 September 2025 21: 26
        Quote: Bearded
        And this is a fat, tasty embezzlement of budget funds.
        Forget it: if you get involved with military orders, you'll be lucky if you come out on top.
    2. +2
      10 September 2025 08: 43
      I wonder if it is possible to use BECs against the BECs themselves.

      and for this purpose, the Ministry of Defense has not yet announced a competition...
      oh, I forgot, we still need to whip up a technical specification for this topic... but the idea is new, almost extraordinary, who will write it?
      then they will sum up the results, and only then will they "think" about it...
    3. 0
      10 September 2025 11: 20
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      I wonder if it is possible to use BECs against the BECs themselves.
      Send a similar BEC with the appropriate weapons and equipment to the attacking BEC.

      Why is this? It will be impossible to guide the BEK-interceptor to the target without a UAV anyway - the viewing range from the water is small.
      And if we already have a reconnaissance UAV hanging in the zone, then what's stopping us from using the existing and operating RUK: reconnaissance UAV + duty "Lancets" operating on its data. They have a shorter reaction time (higher speed) and a lower price.
      1. +3
        10 September 2025 14: 58
        The Lancet doesn't carry much, but you can put a warhead with anti-ship missiles on a boat. And hit the bridge on the Dnieper in Zaporozhye...
        1. -1
          10 September 2025 16: 10
          Quote from alexoff
          Lancet drags little

          The Lancet warhead will be enough to combat the enemy's BEC.
          The warhead of a regular BEC to hit another BEC is an overkill.
          Quote from alexoff
          And hit the bridge on the Dnieper in Zaporozhye...

          They already pounded the bridge in Zatoka with BEK. The result is that the bridge is standing, more explosives are needed.
          1. +2
            10 September 2025 17: 38
            The warhead of a regular BEC to hit another BEC is an overkill.
            So no one suggested boats for attacking boats, it's a strange idea in general. Unless you install a machine gun or a bunch of small drones.
            They already pounded the bridge in Zatoka with BEK. The result is that the bridge is standing, more explosives are needed.
            or maybe someone just put a fab in a boat and decided that was enough? When did all this happen? In 2022, the first strike by an enemy boat left only scorch marks on our ship, after which they dug up half-ton cumulative warheads from decommissioned P-15s and they began to make huge holes in the ships. And our approach - one boat in the entire SVO time to the bridge, the bridge did not collapse - we drove through everything, the bridges are invulnerable, we have to put Kuzkina's mother, there is no other way request
            Recently we had a bridge hit with fabs, and all of a sudden the bombs in the bridge were about the same size as the bombs and the bridge didn't collapse. Did someone think, tweaked the fuse? No, the bridge is invulnerable, let's move on. But for some reason it's very useful to hit warehouses with geraniums, although the warehouses don't end and we're still far from Kyiv. Well, maybe we can forget about them, geraniums, since there's no immediate victory? what
            1. 0
              10 September 2025 19: 37
              Quote from alexoff
              So no one proposed boats for attacking boats, this is a completely strange idea.

              Let me remind you how this comment thread started:
              Quote: The same LYOKHA
              I wonder if it is possible to use BECs against the BECs themselves.
              Send a similar BEC with the appropriate weapons and equipment to the attacking BEC.

              Quote from alexoff
              or maybe someone just put a fab in a boat and decided that was enough? When did all this happen?

              The BEC attack on the bridge in Zatoka is 2023.
              The problem is that to destroy the bridge, the BEK needs to hit the support exactly. Otherwise, the damaging effect will be close to zero. Remember the strike on the Crimean Bridge - 2 BEKs exploded near the 145th support (the protective fence worked), the blast wave shifted one span (didn't even throw it off), the second one remained in place. The support remained intact. After 2 months, traffic on the span was restored.
              1. +2
                10 September 2025 20: 11
                Let me remind you how this comment thread started:
                Well, I think the corresponding weapon is not just a bomb. feel
                The BEC attack on the bridge in Zatoka is 2023.
                The problem is that in order to destroy the bridge, the BEK needs to hit the support exactly.
                so he hit the support right, but the bridge didn't collapse, which is not surprising. With one high-explosive strike. But with such zero persistence, you don't even have to start request
                After 2 months, traffic on the span was restored.
                and to demolish half the bridges on the Dnieper for two months is the collapse of the front. Well, if this is, of course, in a single plan with the offensive, and not like ours - geraniums separately, the front separately
        2. 0
          11 September 2025 16: 59
          Moreover, the BEC can be equipped with Lancets and other systems, pushing the range of attack drone use far out to sea.
          1. 0
            11 September 2025 17: 47
            Lancet was launched from a boat even before the SVO. Now I can't find the link, but its predecessor, the cube-bla, was launched back in 2021
            https://topwar.ru/188914-barrazhirujuschij-boepripas-kub-bla-ot-zala-aero-poluchil-morskuju-versiju.html
  5. +4
    10 September 2025 07: 30
    JSC Izumrud in Vladivostok worked on the initiative R&D project BEK Labyrinth long before it became mainstream. The basis was the Bombardier jet ski. But then it turned out that no one needed it and was not in demand, and so it died. There were no customers, and the plant did not have the working capital to launch even a small series.
  6. -5
    10 September 2025 08: 33
    Quote from: FoBoss_VM
    But then it turned out that no one needed it and it was not in demand, and so it died. There were no customers, and the plant did not have the working capital to launch even a small series.

    Have you tried to interest foreign customers?
    With the T-90, it worked... what
    1. +2
      10 September 2025 08: 41
      They dragged it around the Army and naval salons, showed it. There was almost no interest in the backs then, just a toy.
  7. +3
    10 September 2025 08: 47
    I really liked the phrase:
    The boats are equipped with outboard motors available modelsWith their help, a speed of up to 40-45 knots can be achieved.

    What kind are these?
    Yamaha or Tohatsu, maybe Merc???
    You haven't needed anything for over 30 years, and then here are "affordable models"...
  8. +1
    10 September 2025 08: 50
    Everything related to the Russian Navy from my "couch potato" perspective for today
    causes bewilderment and questions. Let's start with the throwing about in terms of the vector of development of the fleet: from a super aircraft carrier to ships of the littoral zone, small missile ships and you BEKs; invest in the repair of old ships, built by the USSR or build your own 1st rank or frigates.
    All these throwings are connected with the lack of vision of the role of the Navy in organizing the defense of the state (excluding submarines, whose tasks are clear). Should the state have military bases in the area of ​​interests: Africa, South America, etc.
    Until the role of the Navy is defined, all discussions regarding the fleet are groundless.
    Well, BEKs are simply one of the types of weapons that a fleet must have, and these weapons must be of different “calibers” and be located on different carriers.
    At the same time, BEKs are dependent on guidance systems, target designation, etc. That is, it is easy to create a radio-controlled "toy", the question is in the availability of AWACS, a group of satellites that carry out reconnaissance, control and management of BEKs, as well as their carriers.
    1. 0
      10 September 2025 11: 29
      Quote: Apis1962
      All this throwing around is connected with the lack of vision of the role of the Navy in organizing the defense of the state (excluding submarines, whose tasks are clear).

      Oh, come on. Nothing is clear about the nuclear submarines either. How should the same "Yasen" be used - to cover SSBNs and SSGNs, or to strike SLCMs at ground targets, or to strike anti-ship missiles at enemy ships?
      If this is an escort for SSBNs, without which they cannot survive, then why do the Yasen need so many SLCM launchers? And if it is for solving other problems, then who will cover the SSBNs, of which we already have more planned construction than the Yasen?
      No, of course I understand that a universal APL is stylish trendy youth. But not in a situation where the fleet urgently needs two dozen of these SSNs to solve the most important task - the strategic security of the country. And there is no money and industrial capacity for building SSNs in a universal version.

      The worst thing is that all the throwing around in terms of the fleet development vector nullifies 40% of Russia's strategic nuclear warheads, the carriers of which simply have nothing to cover from the moment they leave their bases.
      1. +3
        10 September 2025 14: 07
        Oh well. The Premier League is also unclear.

        So it's worse than I thought. Considering the tension with Comrade Aliyev, it's necessary to quickly revive the Caspian Flotilla, and then the karakurts and pshh.
      2. 0
        10 September 2025 15: 15
        Well, I don't think that mines for anti-ship missiles slow down production that much and make construction more expensive. Maybe 20-25% at most. If we had six ash trees instead of five, but a little shorter, it wouldn't help much against two dozen Virginias and an unknown number of diesel submarines of American buddies, not counting planes and ships. request
        1. +2
          10 September 2025 16: 07
          Quote from alexoff
          Well, I don't think that mines for anti-tank missiles slow down production that much and make construction more expensive. Maybe 20-25% at most.

          Using the example of the Virginias of the 4th and 5th blocks, it is clear that the compartment with the UVP increases the submarine's displacement by 30%.
          If the main objective of the Yasen design had been to combat enemy submarines, then they would have fit within the dimensions of Project 671RTM.
          Quote from alexoff
          If we had six ash trees instead of five, but a little shorter, it wouldn't have helped much against two dozen Virginias and an unknown number of diesel submarines of American buddies, not counting planes and ships

          Other forces should deal with enemy aircraft and ships approaching the "bastion". The task of the SSN in defense is pure ASW.
          And "five or six"... even single SSNs are important to us, since even according to the plan there will be fewer Yasen than SSBNs.
          Not long ago, we had only one multipurpose nuclear submarine in the Pacific Fleet, but now we have three. Five SSBNs and three SSGNs.
          1. 0
            10 September 2025 17: 47
            If the main objective of the Yasen design had been to combat enemy submarines, then they would have fit within the dimensions of Project 671RTM.
            As far as I remember, the task was to reduce the Soviet zoo of boats of different types and make two types, but a larger quantity due to serial production. One SSBN and one universal, which is both a pike, and a Lada, and an Antey. But with the quantity, something did not work out very well request
            1. +1
              10 September 2025 19: 27
              Quote from alexoff
              As far as I remember, the task was to reduce the Soviet zoo from a bunch of boats of different types and make two types, but a larger number due to serial production.

              As a result, instead of a cheap and large-scale SSN with the ability to use SLCMs, they created an expensive SSGN with the ability to be used in the SSN role.
              The concept of a universal SSN is, in principle, not bad... but only if you have the budget and the US industry. smile
              Moreover, the Navy had the option to stay within the limits of two types of nuclear submarines. But in this case it was necessary to make a separate light escort SSN and a separate universal nuclear submarine from the Borey with two types of loading of the shafts: 1 SLBM or 5-7 SLCMs.
              1. +1
                10 September 2025 20: 00
                As a result, instead of a cheap and large-scale SSN with the ability to use SLCMs, they created an expensive SSGN with the ability to be used in the SSN role.
                Well, I'm not sure that if we started to churn out some kind of Shchuka-V with an additional six pipes for onyx, there would be a lot of them request
                We can't build karakurts normally, they even sent less than twenty simple raptor boats to the whole country. In my opinion, for naval commanders, anything more than ten is too much, and it would be better if there were few, cheap and useless. A ship is like your mother's favorite vase, you need to take care of it and not use it. fool
                a universal nuclear submarine from the Borey with two types of silo loading: 1 SLBM or 5-7 SLCMs
                It seems like they were planning to make an arsenal of calibers out of Borey, but for now we need to stuff the nuclear loaves somewhere, we are already not at the START limit

                In my humble opinion, if it is difficult to protect submarines in two places, they should be protected in one. In the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, gather all the submarines far away from partners, and not within the range of a hemars strike from Norway. And in general, they could have been launched into Baikal without sonars and torpedoes. lol
                1. 0
                  25 October 2025 18: 09
                  Calibers and submarines with them against the natives.
      3. +1
        10 September 2025 21: 29
        Quote: Alexey RA
        But there is no money or industrial capacity for the construction of a universal SSN.
        We have too few ships to make them specialized. And I don't think that building a purely torpedo submarine would be much faster and cheaper than a submarine with torpedoes and missiles.
  9. 0
    10 September 2025 09: 09
    The key problem is:
    "Using serial"
    Housings. Engines.
    For a disposable toy, this is expensive. Everything needs to be developed from scratch. With an emphasis on savings.
  10. +1
    10 September 2025 10: 50
    Of course, they were late with the BEKs, but it is better to start late than never. It's like the old Russian proverb: "Until the thunder strikes, the man will not cross himself." They really started moving only after the Ukrainian Armed Forces had thoroughly thinned out the Black Sea Fleet and effectively blocked it at distant bases. So far, the score is 5:1 in favor of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. We are waiting for it to change for the better.
  11. 0
    25 October 2025 18: 07
    Why did they manage to destroy it? Because the back was a simple fishing boat with a motor and Ukrainians You didn't guess. We have no background, the government thinks the war will soon end and the useless Black Sea Fleet will resurface and start plowing around again.
  12. 0
    9 November 2025 08: 57
    I don't quite understand why BEKs imitate boats with crews? Why all this extra space and superstructure?
    For the Ukrainian theater of operations, a 500-kilometer-range unmanned torpedo is quite sufficient. This means an electric torpedo with a front extension: fuel, engine, generator, and a snorkel with antennas. With a range of 10 miles and widespread use, this is the ultimate weapon at sea.
  13. 0
    2 January 2026 17: 47
    Does Ukraine even have any anti-submarine capabilities? Ports could easily be bombarded with conventional torpedoes from diesel-electric submarines.