Quiet Kirsanov in the Civil War

9 935 30
Quiet Kirsanov in the Civil War

More than a hundred years have passed since the end of the Tambov uprising, which was part of history under the name "Antonovshchina". Historians have repeatedly taken this catchy definition apart, and in the end they no longer dispute the almost leading role of Alexander Stepanovich Antonov in those events.

In recent years, many archival documents have been declassified. Archival data materials contain a wide variety of information: reports of the Kirsanov Politburo on the development of the insurgent movement, information from visiting sessions of the Tambov Provincial Cheka, information reports on the political situation and mood of the population.



Extracts from the minutes of meetings, memoirs of former Cheka employees in Kirsanovsky district have also been published... But, analyzing all these documents, even professional historians come to the conclusion that many of them were already falsified at that time.

In the district town of K.


By the early 1920s, the civil war in Russia had finally ended. The country, torn apart by years of bloody battles, was gradually coming to its senses. It seemed that in this peaceful environment, the time had come to calmly restore the destroyed industry and raise agriculture.


In Kirsanov, the big changes at first did not lead to any serious changes in everyday life. But the domestic political situation in the country left much to be desired, and in the end, the district town of Kirsanov, the easternmost railway station in the Tambov province, did not remain on the sidelines.

And the new government, including in such small towns, did not hold on as firmly as it wanted. Even when the White Army had already been routed and defeated, acts of disobedience to the new government continued practically throughout the entire territory of the country.

In Ukraine, for a long time after the Germans left, vast territories were controlled by the "independent" detachments led by the atamans Nestor Makhno and Yuri Tyutyunnik. In Crimea, the "greens" became active, and rebels under the command of General Przhevalsky operated near Novorossiysk. Nationalist resistance movements in Belarus and Georgia were gaining strength...

The Red Terror, which during the civil war was directed primarily against the pro-monarchist, frankly speaking, reactionary part of the population, smoothly switched to the socialist revolutionaries and anarchists who had previously sympathized with the Bolsheviks. And there were reasons for this.

War for bread


The grave food situation in Soviet Russia forced the Council of People's Commissars to introduce the so-called food levy for the peasantry. This simply meant the gratuitous confiscation of surplus grain from the peasantry, whose interests were represented and defended by the Socialist Revolutionaries both before and immediately after the revolution.

Tambov province, much larger in area than the current region, located in the very center of the Russian Black Earth Region, has long been considered one of the main granaries of the country. Unfortunately, the severe drought of 1920 hit this region as well.

However, the food detachments had a specific task - to fulfill the plan for the confiscation of surplus grain. But confiscation threatened the villagers and their families with death by starvation. And people began to defend themselves. Attacks on the supply detachments of the food detachments initially occurred spontaneously. The peasants simply took up pitchforks and defended their grain.

But when similar reprisals occurred in several villages at once, the authorities at the level of police units and special purpose units (ChON) responded to the rebels with repressions. Peasants from numerous villages began heading to Kirsanov, where a detachment had already been formed in the forests, headed by the implacable enemy of the Bolsheviks, Alexander Stepanovich Antonov.

A very "fiery" revolutionary


By the beginning of these events, A. S. Antonov was already a very popular figure among the country's population. He was born in 1889 in Moscow. Then, together with his parents, he moved to his homeland in Kirsanov, where he graduated from a three-year city school. But he never did any real work, devoting himself entirely to revolutionary activity as part of the Tambov cell of the Socialist Revolutionaries.


It must be said that propaganda work was alien to the young man, but he turned out to be a very successful raider, who was engaged in expropriating money from banks to replenish the party coffers. Moreover, the damage from his activities was so great that the tsarist secret police appointed a reward of 1000 rubles for the capture of Antonov - a colossal amount of money at that time.

When he finally fell into the hands of the police, the servants of Themis sentenced Antonov to death. However, given the age of the criminal, the hanging was replaced by life imprisonment. Antonov was released under an amnesty declared by the Provisional Government in 1917, and immediately joined the revolutionary movement.

He served in the police, first in Tambov as a department chief, then headed the district police and was appointed chief in Kirsanov. By the way, Aleksandr Stepanovich served well. He fought crime and maintained revolutionary order. He was even awarded the revolutionary weapons - Mauser. The facts alone speak volumes.

The Kirsanov district also took part in a peculiar parade of sovereignties, having declared its secession from Russia and an independent republic. Antonov and his assistant were urgently sent to Kirsanov, where he immediately found himself at a rally of many thousands. Antonov tried to disperse the protesters and arrest all the leaders of the "republic", but they were arrested first, then released as one of their own - a local.

But there was no real power in the district, and on the side of the new arrivals, first of all, there was force - the new chief of police quickly formed several mounted detachments, placing them in key places of the city. The detachments were immediately pulled to the place of any emergency, and this method was later adopted by Tukhachevsky from Antonov - this is how he caught Antonov himself.


Antonov still managed to restore order in the district in six months and arrest the most authoritative bandits and robbers. In the summer of 1918, many rebelled in the Tambov province, and the first were mobilized soldiers, among whom Antonov and his detachment first of all localized the instigators, thwarting all attempts at a coup.

The district became one of the first where state farms were created on the basis of landowners' estates, and peasants stole the property. Antonov and his policemen were also responsible for protecting the state farm property. And the subordinates loved Antonov, a demanding but fair boss, especially since he got them a raise.

When he was given to understand that Antonov himself, as the boss, would receive a salary increase, but his subordinates would not, he replied that until his subordinates’ salaries were increased, he did not need a penny.

Antonov also distinguished himself in disarming Czechoslovak prisoners. The trains passed through Kirsanov to Vladivostok, where they were scheduled to board ships to France. The Czechs, en route, did not hesitate to rob and pillage. They had yet become an organized force – the same corps, but they were well armed.

They were feared at the scene, trying to let the trains through as quickly as possible, but Antonov was not afraid to arrest the Czech commanders. Without their commanders, the prisoners were clearly confused and did not resist when Kirsanov's policemen disarmed them. The weapons were collected, taken away and hidden, and, apparently, later used.

The Destiny That You Choose


The entire short but bright life of Alexander Stepanovich was connected with the district town of Kirsanov. He grew up here, spent his childhood here. He married the local beauty Sofia Bogolyubskaya here, and spent their honeymoon here. His parents lived and were buried here. He went down in history from Kirsanov.


The city has preserved many places associated with his name. This includes the old building of the boarding school on Krasnoarmeyskaya Street, built back in 1900 and belonging to a real school, which was located there in 1908-1918.


House No. 46 on Sovetskaya Street has also been preserved, where the family of one of the city's richest merchants and patrons of the arts, Vasily Stepanovich Sosulnikov, settled before the revolution. After the revolution, the house was nationalized, it was given over to apartments for employees of the new government, and one of the apartments was allocated to Antonov.

After the unsuccessful attempt by the Left Socialist Revolutionaries to raise a rebellion in the country and the subsequent repressions against fellow party members, the member of the Kirsanov District Council of Peasants' and Soldiers' Deputies, Alexander Stepanovich Antonov, did not immediately, but went into the Kirsanov forests.

There the first rebel combat unit was created, about 20 people, well armed, with well-chosen commanders and personnel, strict discipline. Having adopted the slogan "Soviets without communists", Antonov began the fight against the new government - all the same expropriations, murders of activists, security officers, attacks on food detachments, distribution of what was taken back to the peasants. But Antonov thought on a larger scale.

Everything changed when, on August 21, 1920, the peasants of the village of Kamenka dealt with one of the food detachments, then disarmed another sent to rescue their "comrades." Antonov decided that his time had come, and responded to the invitation of the peasants from Kamenka and the surrounding villages to lead an uprising against the Bolshevik government.

This is what they decided at a general meeting, where they were worried about the fact that they had almost no weapons. Tambov province, unlike Ukraine, where German troops and Petliura were sometimes present, was still quite quiet: the peasants had pitchforks, some had hunting rifles or a rifle from the front - so you can't even go against the police.

On August 24, Antonov arrived in the village with a detachment, and the peasants, as if Boris Godunov had come to power, persuaded him to accept the uprising. Antonov did not refuse – he compared himself to the people's ataman Stenka Razin and began singing his favorite song from the Anglo-Boer War, "Transvaal, Transvaal, my country, you are all burning in flames."

The battle with the Red Army is still far away - it is busy at the front, but for now it is possible to remove the chairman of the Tambov provincial executive committee, comrade Chichkanov. Especially since the Bolsheviks removed him from his leadership position for surrendering Tambov to Mamontov's Cossacks.

Going against the cavalry corps with two hundred guards in 1919 was tantamount to suicide, and Chichkanov had to flee Tambov, and then the Bolsheviks. He went hunting on Lake Ilmen and fell into Antonov's hands. And Antonov, already a sort of Tambov leader, sentenced Chichkanov to death and gave the order to carry out the sentence.

Tambov leader


The Soviet government simply did not have the opportunity to seriously engage in the fight against Antonov for a long time. Especially since he enjoyed the support and sympathy of the peasants, who were the main part of the province's population, and he defended their interests.

The detachment, already numbering one hundred and fifty people, was rapidly growing. By the autumn of 1920, it already numbered more than 6 thousand personnel. Antonov's military actions, severely limited in scale, since there was almost no one to fight, were carried out with varying success.

The rebels are capturing more and more weapons, and Antonov is showing off. In the village of Gusevka, for example, he speaks to all the people from the gun carriage of a cannon captured from the Reds, just like Lenin did from an armored car. The Tambov leader loves beautiful gestures. He fights on a white horse, has a white burka, a white papakha.

Moscow eventually responded by sending regular troops freed up at the front into the rebellious region with orders not to stand on ceremony. And so it began!

In the villages that were declared "bandit", all grain and other food was confiscated. Houses were burned, and men were sent to concentration camps for forced labor. The same Kirsanov and Kirsanov district were divided into military sectors. And in Golynshchina, the largest concentration camp for a thousand people was organized.

Not only participants and sympathizers of the uprising were kept there, but also hostages – civilians: old people, women, teenagers, small children. These measures were partly effective. But at the same time, they contributed to an increase in the number of rebels.


As a result, in November 1920, a "congress of free peasantry" took place, at which all previously disparate detachments united into the United Partisan Army of the Tambov Region. Now the rebels had the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd armies, consisting of 14 infantry, 5 cavalry regiments, and 1 separate brigade with 25 machine guns and 5 guns.

The rebels also organized their own political bodies on the basis of the remaining Socialist Revolutionary organizations. At the same time, a single body of civil self-government was formed – the Union of Working Peasants (STK). Its political program sounded like this: the overthrow of the Bolshevik government and the convocation of the Constituent Assembly.

The army was reformed in accordance with military regulations, with a staff structure, making the regiment the main combat unit. It was already a full-fledged army, numbering more than 50 thousand fighters, with its artillery, rear, medical service, tribunal, intelligence and counterintelligence. The senior and middle command staff were awarded the appropriate military ranks.

In fairness, it should be noted that A. S. Antonov himself held the position of Chief of Staff of the 2nd Insurgent Army, but at the same time, it was he who actually remained the organizer and inspirer of the uprising. Pyotr Mikhailovich Tokmakov, a lieutenant in the tsarist army, a full Knight of the Cross of St. George, a participant in the Russo-Japanese War and the First World War, and, by the way, a native of the village of Inzhavino, Kirsanovsky District, Tambov Governorate, was appointed commander of the United Army.

The ending should ...

Co-authors: Vladimir Polyansky, Kirsanov - Smolensk
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    10 September 2025 05: 52
    There have already been works on the Tambov Uprising on VO, it will be interesting to compare this article with the previous ones.
    Have a nice day everyone, thanks to the authors!
    1. +2
      10 September 2025 10: 06
      What's there to compare? It'll be the same thing. Yes
  2. +2
    10 September 2025 06: 17
    It turns out to be some kind of narcissistic Robin Hood. During perestroika and the following years, who wasn't declared a "true hero", and even now the same Constantinople and Spas are not far behind.
  3. +3
    10 September 2025 07: 19
    - Trubnikov wants to eat a bun, but the working class doesn't want to eat a bun? - Kaloyev says as if to himself.


    It would be interesting to know about the "composition of Tambov state farms".
    The district became one of the first where state farms like those of the landowners were created on the basis of their estates, and the peasants stole the property.

    So, were they "like state farms" or did the peasants steal property and then not want to part with what they had stolen?
    1. 0
      11 September 2025 16: 44
      Antonov's military operations, severely limited in scale since there was almost no one to fight, were carried out with varying success.

      The article is certainly interesting! Respect to the author.
      But the style? There are some sentences that you can't understand what the author wanted to say the first time?!
  4. -3
    10 September 2025 08: 16
    And you can’t stop trying to pull the “champions” of the people out of the darkness and sing their praises?
  5. +6
    10 September 2025 08: 22
    Very poorly written. Not proofread, chaotic text, several omissions of "not" - which makes the meaning of the sentence opposite
    1. +4
      10 September 2025 09: 42
      Very poorly written. Not proofread, chaotic text, several omissions of "not" - which makes the meaning of the sentence opposite
      Agree
    2. +1
      11 September 2025 16: 45
      Quote: your1970
      Very poorly written. Not proofread, chaotic text, several omissions of "not" - which makes the meaning of the sentence opposite

      That's what I said above!
      1. -1
        11 September 2025 17: 35
        Quote: your vsr 66-67
        Quote: your1970
        Very poorly written. Not proofread, chaotic text, several omissions of "not" - which makes the meaning of the sentence opposite

        That's what I said above!

        Let me correct you a little - I said this yesterday at 08:20, and you today at 16:45.
        But the site THE FIRST comment to the article - took me somewhere down
        Here's the thing - the one on top is not always the first lol
        1. 0
          11 September 2025 19: 04
          Quote: your1970
          Quote: your vsr 66-67
          Quote: your1970
          Very poorly written. Not proofread, chaotic text, several omissions of "not" - which makes the meaning of the sentence opposite

          That's what I said above!

          Let me correct you a little - I said this yesterday at 08:20, and you today at 16:45.
          But the site THE FIRST comment to the article - took me somewhere down
          Here's the thing - the one on top is not always the first lol

          I noticed this a long time ago too! request
          But only the moderators know about this laughing
  6. 0
    10 September 2025 08: 28
    Tambov to Mamontov's Cossacks.

    That's when the peasants had to act together with the army of free Russia, and not sit and wait for the rooster to peck.

    As Alexander Vasilyevich Kolchak prophetically wrote to the peasants: fight for your freedom now, while you have cannons, machine guns, officers, later it will be difficult and impossible.

    And so it happened - the red partisans then came out against the Bolsheviks and were drowned in blood.

    the largest concentration camp, where not only participants and sympathizers of the uprising were held, but also hostages - civilians: old people, women, teenagers, young children

    It must be said that the hostages were DISPERSED until the rebels were handed over. And these beasts cynically boldly call themselves...the power of the people.

    This is not how they treated foreign enemies...

    Thanks to the author for the article.
    1. +2
      10 September 2025 19: 03
      Quote: Olgovich
      It must be said that the hostages were DISPERSED until the rebels were handed over. And these beasts cynically boldly call themselves...the power of the people.
      We learned from the white hares.
      1. -4
        11 September 2025 13: 39
        Quote: bk0010
        We learned from the white hares.

        purely a big invention. see their hostages 1918, for example the massacre in Kislovolsk
        1. +3
          11 September 2025 14: 19
          In the Ural region alone, 1919 people were killed by Dutov's Cossacks in January 1050. On April 3, 1919, the Cossack ataman ordered the execution and taking of hostages at the slightest sign of disloyalty.
          an excerpt from the order of the governor of Yenisei and part of Irkutsk provinces, General S. N. Rozanov, Kolchak’s special representative in the city of Krasnoyarsk, dated March 27, 1919:
          6. Among the population to take hostages, in case of action of fellow villagers directed against government troops, shoot hostages mercilessly.
          7. Use local residents for reconnaissance and communications, taking hostages. In case of incorrect and untimely information or betrayal of hostages, execute and burn down the houses belonging to them.
          Kreichy's order was similar to Rozanov's order, it spoke about taking hostages from among the residents of settlements located within a 20-mile zone from the railway line, shooting them, burning suspicious villages when committing sabotage that caused the collapse of trains and not handing over the guilty.
          1. -4
            11 September 2025 14: 50
            Quote: bk0010
            7. For pintelligence, communications to use local residents, taking hostages. In case of incorrect and untimely information or betrayal of hostages to execute, and the house

            even here you lie:

            7. How to generalits management, remember: on the population, obviously or
            secretly helping robbers should be looked upon as enemies,
            and deal with them mercilessly, and compensate them with their property
            losses caused by military actions to that part of the population,
            which stands on the side of the government.

            Lieutenant General Rozanov

            V. G. Boldyrev. Directory,

            And see again the HOSTAGES taken by the Reds back in 1918 and executed in agony and for nothing.
          2. -3
            11 September 2025 14: 50
            Quote: bk0010
            7. For pintelligence, communications to use local residents, taking hostages. In case of incorrect and untimely information or betrayal of hostages to execute, and the house

            even here you lie:

            7. How to generalits management, remember: on the population, obviously or
            secretly helping robbers should be looked upon as enemies,
            and deal with them mercilessly, and compensate them with their property
            losses caused by military actions to that part of the population,
            which stands on the side of the government.

            Lieutenant General Rozanov

            V. G. Boldyrev. Directory,

            And see again the HOSTAGES taken by the Reds back in 1918 and executed in agony and for nothing.
    2. 0
      20 January 2026 13: 00
      It would be better to write about what Kolchak actually did, and why his junta was collapsing under the weight of peasant uprisings (the very same peasants he called to freedom) even before the main Red Army forces, busy in other theaters of war, had even joined in. And the Czechs' gold and other international recognition didn't help.
      Regarding Mamantov's raid, don't try to be clever without knowing the subject. VO has already published interesting articles about those events, but it seems a drunk can sleep it off, but a White Russian will never. Mamantov passed through my small hometown of Lebedyan. Since childhood, I've been finding Enfield cartridges and saber hilts with my friends in our gardens. And so this topic is personal to me, a living one. I know more now, but I still don't draw any conclusions.
  7. +7
    10 September 2025 09: 55
    Decommunization in action, the article and its continuation will be a set of created myths. I do not want to analyze the entire article. I would like the authors to present the order on awarding Antonov with a "revolutionary weapon". Because the Decree of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of April 8, 1920 legalized a number of awards in 1919 with honorary revolutionary weapons. In the Resolution of the Presidium of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR of December 12, 1924, the awarding of firearms was added to the previous decree. Firearms were awarded to persons previously awarded a saber with the Order of the Red Banner imposed. There were three such persons, Budyonny S.M., Kamenev S.S., Medvedev N.V., the above decree did not provide for the awarding of honorary revolutionary weapons, for example, to district police chiefs. By the way, among those awarded honorary cold revolutionary weapons, there is not a single employee of the All-Russian Extraordinary Commission. The Mauser could have been presented to Antonov, at the local level, as a valuable gift. And the entire article consists of such moments. Somewhere they kept silent, somewhere they distorted the events. Or another pearl.
    In Ukraine, for a long time after the Germans left, vast territories were controlled by the "independent" detachments led by the atamans Nestor Makhno and Yuri Tyutyunnik. In Crimea, the "greens" became active, and rebels under the command of General Przhevalsky operated near Novorossiysk. Nationalist resistance movements in Belarus and Georgia were gaining strength...
    Tyutyunnik, yes, controlled large territories in Ukraine, in 1918, but before the arrival of the Germans, many figures of the Ukrainian nationalist movement found refuge under the protection of Tyutyunnik, including the future hetman of the Ukrainian state Pavlo Skoropadsky. He was a member of the Central Rada, but as a sign of disagreement with its pro-German policy, namely with the introduction of German troops into Ukraine, he raised an uprising. Tyutyunnik later became a red committee, and fought on the side of the Petliurites and the Poles, in 1921 when he invaded from Polish territory to Soviet territory, he was defeated by units of the Red Army. Makhno. In 1920, the territories controlled by Makhno included: Novo-Moskovsky, Pavlovsky and Aleksandrovsky districts of the Yekaterinoslav province, Konstantinovsky and Kremenchug districts of the Poltava province, Izyumsky and Kupyansky districts of the Kharkov province. In September 1921, General Przhevalsky's rebels tried to take Yekaterinodar. On the night of September 22-23, they were defeated by Budyonny's Soviet troops near the village of Beloye. With the remnants of the detachment, he retreated to the mountains of the Black Sea coast. Where he was subsequently routed. The green partisans of Crimea are Wrangelites who did not evacuate with the main forces. Several events from different times are mixed into one heap.
  8. +6
    10 September 2025 10: 45
    Nationalist resistance movements in Belarus and Georgia were gaining strength

    What resistance movement, especially nationalist, do the authors mean? About the invasion from the territory of Poland of the Savinkov, Bulak-Bulakhovich troops? Who burned, killed communists, sympathizers, Soviet workers. Film. State Border, Peaceful Summer of 1921. Fiction, but based on real events. A little about Georgia, how could nationalists raise their heads in Georgia, if in February 1921 in Georgia, Soviet power was established on the entire territory. And the uprising did happen in 1924, raised by nationalists and then in several counties.
  9. +1
    10 September 2025 14: 50
    "A reward of 1000 rubles was a colossal amount of money at that time." That's about the salary of an engineer or teacher for half a year, maybe a year. A significant amount, but not "colossal."
    1. +3
      10 September 2025 20: 29
      The salary of a senior janitor in the capital is 40 rubles, 480 per year.
  10. +2
    10 September 2025 17: 02
    I read it. I am delighted, it is just a song.

    The food detachments had a specific task - to fulfill the plan for confiscating surplus grain. But confiscation threatened the villagers and their families with starvation.


    Without excess there is immediate death.

    Antonov also distinguished himself during the disarmament of Czechoslovakian prisoners.


    Really Czechoslovakian? Exactly, exactly?

    Antonov's military operations, severely limited in scale since there was almost no one to fight, were carried out with varying success.


    This is in my quotation book. I will not accept any objections.
    1. +2
      10 September 2025 20: 31
      Yes, it turns out that the captured Czechoslovaks also had weapons. Probably, the Austrians, Germans, Hungarians, Croatians, etc. had their weapons taken away, but when the Czechoslovaks were captured, their weapons were left behind. Well, it’s not enough to go hunting from the camp, get a job as a guard in a store or in a warehouse with a “gun”, every other day, three days. But you never know. Yes
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      11 September 2025 09: 33
      Antonov's military operations, severely limited in scale since there was almost no one to fight, were carried out with varying success.

      This is in my quotation book. I will not accept any objections.

      What is there to object to? Antonov's military actions were very limited in scale because it doesn't take much heroism to slaughter an unarmed village council that was unable to resist. In 1920, when Antonov began his rebellion, Russia was fighting off a Polish invasion. Even the White Guard émigrés were outraged by this invasion. At that time, all the country's forces were thrown into repelling the intervention, so the Soviets simply didn't have the strength to fight Antonov. But to you, apparently, the atrocities of Antonov and the Poles in Russia at that time are like balm for the soul. Are you not in the Armed Forces of Ukraine yet?
      1. +1
        11 September 2025 18: 11
        Quote: Old electrician
        But to you, judging by everything, the atrocities of Antonov and the Poles in Russia at that time are like balm to the soul. Are you not in the Armed Forces of Ukraine yet?

        You READ Haven't you tried it???!!!! What does Antonov's atrocities or the slaughtered village councils have to do with it?????
        The author writes nonsense
        "Antonov's combat operations were very limited in scale, since there was almost no one to fight with(!!!!!!!!)), went with with varying success." belay "
        It's like in an old joke
        "- are you playing chess with a ram????
        -:what's the point of playing with him, he's a ram!
        - And the bill??
        - 1x1" (c)
        If there is “almost no one to fight with,” then military operations physically cannot “proceed with varying success.”
        And such a mess throughout the article, there are still a bunch of "not" missing - because of which the meaning of the sentence is strictly the opposite
      2. +1
        11 September 2025 19: 53
        To wage war with "almost no one" with varying success? HOW is that? Couldn't he find the ChON members in the forest, so he went into the swamp, shot the frogs, drowning his supporters? How can you wage war with varying success with an absent enemy? Who was taking mushrooms, the author or the hero of the article, with all his followers?
  11. +5
    11 September 2025 09: 17
    Another pseudo-analysis by pseudo-historians:
    The Red Terror, which during the years of the civil war was directed primarily against the pro-monarchist, frankly speaking, reactionary part of the population, smoothly switched to the socialist revolutionaries and anarchists who had previously sympathized with the Bolsheviks.
    - hee-hee-hee.
    Dear authors, I didn't understand who! Name at least one leader of the White movement who was a monarchist. Who was a monarchist: Kolchak? Denikin? Yudenich? Wrangel? Or someone else? The autocracy was overthrown by the British and French during the February color revolution. In turn, the White army were natives in the service of the white sahibs. Our invaluable allies would under no circumstances have angered them by reviving the autocracy because they had already divided the skin of the unkilled bear. Any leader of the White movement who uttered a word against the sahibs would have died that same day, poisoned by lead plums.
    The fundamental postulate of the Socialist Revolutionaries was the thesis and the whole theory based on it about active "heroes" and a passive "crowd". In order to lead this crowd, or rather, to kick this crowd into the Bright Future, the Socialist Revolutionaries assumed only one way - terror. Terror in small and large ways was their main political instrument.
    In 1917, the Socialist Revolutionary Party had about a million members. The Socialist Revolutionaries supported the Provisional Government, which, in turn, was entirely in the service of England and France.
    In the autumn of 1917, the Socialist Revolutionaries split into left and right. Despite the split, even the Left Socialist Revolutionaries, who initially opposed the war and participated in the overthrow of the Provisional Government, perceived the "Brest Peace" as a betrayal of the revolution, or rather, as a betrayal of our invaluable "allies". As a result, the first armed actions of the Right Socialist Revolutionaries against Soviet power are dated October 28-29, 1917 (old style). This was long before the "Brest Peace" was concluded.
    The Left and Right Socialist Revolutionaries tried to subordinate the entire peasantry to their influence, while pretending that there were no harsh social contradictions between the kulaks and the working peasantry. Therefore, apart from the kulaks, they had no other social support. Due to the lack of a social base, by 1918 the Left Socialist Revolutionaries had become a minority in the Soviets. The Right Socialist Revolutionaries left the Soviets even before the October Revolution.
    Due to the loss of the majority in the Soviets and disagreement with the “Brest Peace”, at the beginning of July 1918, at the III Congress of the Left Socialist Revolutionary Party, a decision was made to move to armed struggle against the traitors of the revolution – the Bolsheviks.
    At the V Congress of Soviets from July 4 to 10, the Left SRs failed to push through a resolution declaring revolutionary war on Germany and demonstratively left the session. After this, the Left SR factions and their Menshevik allies were expelled from the All-Russian Central Executive Committee. In retaliation, the SRs turned to their favorite terror.
    On July 6, 1918, in order to disrupt the Brest Peace, the Left Socialist Revolutionaries killed the German ambassador Wilhelm von Mirbach. At the same time, the Left Socialist Revolutionaries began an uprising in Moscow. In general, the summer of 1918 was the summer of Socialist Revolutionary rebellions: in Moscow, Yaroslavl, Rybinsk and Murom. The Right Socialist Revolutionaries supported the Czechoslovak rebellion and created the first White Guard government…
    As the anonymous authors write:
    The Red Terror... smoothly switched to the Socialist Revolutionaries and anarchists who had previously sympathized with the Bolsheviks.
    - once again hee-hee-hee. According to the authors of the article, the rebellion, during which the Socialist Revolutionaries demonstrated their tactics of terror against state power in all their glory, is not a reason for the government to worry. For the attention of admirers of terrorists: the Red Terror was a response to the Socialist Revolutionary terror. There was no switch.
    …But when similar reprisals occurred in several villages at once, the authorities at the level of police units and special purpose units (ChON) responded to the rebels with repressions. Peasants from numerous villages began heading to Kirsanov, where a detachment had already been formed in the forests, headed by the implacable enemy of the Bolsheviks, Alexander Stepanovich Antonov…
    - Why lie so shamelessly?
    About the peasant revolt:
    Antonov was a bourgeois, a Socialist Revolutionary since 1905, returned from exile in 1917 and was the head of the district police until the October Revolution; he remained in this post under the Bolsheviks. Since the winter of 1917, he had been preparing a rebellion, stockpiling weapons in secret places; in the summer of 1918, having been exposed, he fled. At the end of 1918, Antonov, at the head of a small detachment, destroyed the Zolotovsky volost council, killed several members of the council, and off it went…
    Tokmakov is a lieutenant, a Socialist Revolutionary, who in 1918 organized a gang to fight the Soviets. Political leader of the rebellion, and from November 1920 commander of the United Partisan Army of the Tambov Region.
    1st Rebel Army. The commander is Colonel Boguslavsky, then Captain Gubarev.
    2nd Insurgent Army. The commander is Staff Captain Mitrofanovich.
    3rd Army — Cavalry and mobile. Commander — Sergeant Major Kolesnikov. Regiments: 1st Bogucharsky (commander Sergeant Major I.S. Kolesnikov), Cossack (commander Yesaul Frolov), Khopersky (commander Ensign Matarykin), 2nd Bogucharsky (centurion Popov). Etc., etc.
    When I imagine Colonel Boguslavsky, Captain Gubarev and Staff Captain Mitrofanovich languishing under the yoke of the Bolshevik food tax, my heart bleeds. As we see, all the leaders of the uprising were peasants from the plough, and all of them suffered from the food tax. At the same time, if the "predatory Bolshevik food tax" hit, first of all, the kulaks, then the rebels mercilessly robbed all the peasants in a row, except for the kulaks. Any uprising by the "liberators from the food tax" was suppressed in the most merciless way - from flogging to shooting and burning families. Freedom from the Bolsheviks is what it's called!
    The role of the peasants in the “peasant” Tambov uprising was one - to be a dumb crowd, which the officers, the sons of kulaks, drove with whips and into the red machine guns.
    Antonov drove 50 thousand people into the army. The Red Army's strength during the suppression of the rebellion was 40,5 thousand people. During the month of fighting, the rebels lost 11 thousand people killed and wounded, 26 thousand people voluntarily surrendered and were captured. The rest fled and surrendered later. This cannot be called ideological resistance to violence. There was no idea!
    The Social Revolutionary underground organization in Tambov was associated with the Moscow Social Revolutionary organization, and that, in turn, was associated with the Social Revolutionary Center in Poland. This Center was headed by the famous terrorist Boris Savenkov. The ruling circles of England and France supported any anti-Soviet forces, including Savinkov's Socialist-Revolutionary organization. The intelligence services of these countries actively provided him with the necessary assistance, therefore the illegal communication channel Warsaw - Moscow - Tambov in 1919-1921 worked smoothly and fairly quickly, despite the blockade and wartime. It remains to add that the underground organizations of the Socialist-Revolutionaries and Cadets in Tambov were defeated only in the spring of 1921. Without this, the elimination of the rebellion would have been impossible.
    Preparations for the Socialist-Revolutionary rebellion began in the winter of 1917-1918, i.e. almost immediately after the establishment of Soviet power. The first two unsuccessful attempts at the Socialist-Revolutionary revolts, which took place in the summer of 1918, were instantly defeated. The mistakes of these failures were taken into account and the SRs prepared much more thoroughly for the next mutiny. Weapons were collected - 12 thousand rifles, about four hundred machine guns and even 4 cannons. Under the guise of supplying the Red Army in Tambov and neighboring provinces, horses were purchased for the cavalry. In the clandestine command courses, future field commanders from among the White Shepherds were trained in guerrilla tactics using the example of the Patriotic War of 1812. An extensive intelligence-conspiratorial network based on kulak families was created throughout the Tambov province. Everything is according to science.
    According to Savinkov's original plan, the rebellion was to begin in May 1920 - simultaneously with the invasion of Poland into Soviet Russia. However, Antonov, despite Savinkov's order, was afraid to start, he had no confidence in victory.
    On August 12, 1920, the Poles launched a counterattack on Tukhachevsky's troops, and by August 16 he was defeated. This time Savinkov was more persistent, and on August 19, 1920, Antonov began a mutiny all over the Tambov region at once. At the same time, the SR gang of Bulak-Balakhovich invaded the territory of Belarus from Poland, which planned to raise all the peasants of Russia to fight the Soviets, triumphantly reach the Tambov region and unite with Antonov. Alas for modern common people, but the punishers from the Bulak-Balakhovich gang pushed the peasants away from themselves with their atrocities and, finding themselves without the support of the population, were defeated.
  12. +1
    21 September 2025 14: 35
    There is a version that it was not Antonov who killed Chichkanov, but the Chekists (Chichkanov tightened party discipline, believing that the dishonest behavior of the Bolsheviks, including the Chekists, was the cause of uprisings). In the archive there is a protocol of the meeting of the provincial executive committee, the second issue on the agenda is the case of the former employee of the Provincial Chek Ekimov, a participant in the murder of the Chairman of the Provincial Executive Committee, comrade Chichkanov. The conclusion is to deny amnesty.
  13. 0
    2 March 2026 06: 20
    The Bolsheviks were too zealous! They should have thought about it carefully! And tried it on cats first!