1500. Peasants against Landsknechts. The Struggle for the Peasant Republic of Dithmarschen

11 510 93
1500. Peasants against Landsknechts. The Struggle for the Peasant Republic of Dithmarschen
A colour woodcut depicting the Battle of Hemmingstedt. It captures well the ferocity of the fighting and the variety of weapons used.


Translation of the article "Landsknechte versus Landwirte. Kampf um die norddeutsche Bauernrepublick", published in the German military- historical in the magazine "Clausewiz" No. 5-2025
Author: Hagen Seehase
Translation: Slug_BDMP




February 17, 1500. On the swampy plains of northern Germany, the battle-tested army of Landsknechts and the peasant militia met. It would seem that a quick and easy victory for the "professionals" was guaranteed. However, what happened shocked everyone, especially the Landsknechts.

The Dithmarschen region in northern Germany, on the Holstein coast of the North Sea, was a Saxon homeland for centuries. In the Middle Ages, it became an agricultural centre thanks to the fertile soils of the marches.

Translator's Note:

Marches  (from German Marsch, Marschland) is a category of wetlands periodically flooded by the waters of a nearby body of water[1], characterized by herbaceous halophytic vegetation. In Russian, this term usually refers to low-lying strips of the sea coast exposed to high tides or surges of sea water.

Marsh soils — soils of marshes — areas of land periodically exposed to the influence of sea waters.


The leading economic force in the region was the wealthy peasants.

Officially, Dithmarschen was a fief of the Archbishop of Bremen. However, in reality it was a kind of self-governing republic, headed by a council of 48 judges, elected for life from among the peasants themselves. The only urban settlement in Dithmarschen worth mentioning was Meldorf.

Dithmarschen's wealth naturally aroused envy. Twice, in 1319 and 1403/04, the Holstein princes attempted to conquer it, but both were successfully repelled by the Dithmarschens.

Around 1471, Emperor Frederick III granted Dithmarschen to the Danish King Christian I (who was also Duke of Holstein), but in 1477 he was forced to reverse his decision under pressure from the Pope, who confirmed the authority of the Archbishop of Bremen over the region.

In 1481, Frederick, Christian's son and heir, became Duke of Holstein, and his elder brother became King of Denmark, Norway and Sweden, John I, or, as his subjects called him, King Hans.


King John I was the ruler of a vast empire that included Denmark, Sweden, Norway and part of Northern Germany

During this period, all his attention was absorbed by Sweden, where the power of the Danish king was shaken by the influence of the national liberation movement led by the knight Sten Sture.

This plays into the hands of the peasant republic, which at this time is building alliances with the Hanseatic cities, which are also wary of the ambitious Danish king.

In 1499, King Hans had successfully dealt with Sweden and turned his attention to Dithmarschen. At the state council in Rendsburg, he demanded not only the restoration of his brother's authority over the region, but also the payment of 15000 marks per year and the construction of three fortresses in key locations in Dithmarschen. This caused indignation among the locals, and it became clear to everyone: war was inevitable.

The balance of power seemed to be clear: the Archbishop of Bremen and the Hanseatic cities refused to help the peasants, and the Danish king called not only the knighthood of Denmark and Holstein, but also the allied contingent from Oldenburg. 2000 heavily armed horsemen (not all of them were knights, of course, this number also included squires) were not even the largest contingent. The Holstein militia numbered 5000 people. Johann also had an impressive artillery a park of two dozen field guns, but they rather tie down the army.

But the main striking force of the royal army is the four-thousand-strong "Black Guard" led by Junker Thomas Slentz. The origin of this man is unclear. There is information that he was from Cologne, although his surname is more typical for eastern Germany. But more is known about Slentz's army - they are landsknechts.

One of the first mentions of this term dates back to 1471. The chronicle of the Palatine city of Landsheim mentions that it was defended, among others, by "20 infantrymen from this area" (20 Fussknechte diesselbe Land). This emphasized that these were German mercenaries, as opposed to foreigners. However, these warriors still bear little resemblance to those stereotypical Landsknechts in their split, colorful clothes. They would become like that only in 20–30 years.

"Black Guard"


This army was born during the War of the Burgundian Succession. Then, in 1479, the future Emperor Maximilian managed to decide the Battle of Genegate in his favor thanks to it. The Landsknechts were first able to hold their position, and then go on the offensive and take the battlefield. Maximilian himself fought on foot in the ranks of the Landsknechts, holding a pike. Although the army later disintegrated, Maximilian was inspired by the idea of ​​creating a national infantry fighting in the Swiss manner.

When Maximilian was crowned King of Rome in 1486, he recruited two such formations, one three- and one four-thousand strong, armed with long pikes and trained by Swiss instructors. The warriors came primarily from Swabia, Alsace, Tyrol and the Rhineland. In 1488, the Stadtholder of Friesland, Albrecht of Saxony, used a formation of Landsknechts, the "Black Guard", to suppress a Frisian rebellion. Soon after, another formation of 2000 fighters joined them, and they were given the name "Magna Guardia". Soon after, their leader, the Franconian adventurer Wilwolt von Schaumberg, purchased black cloth for his Landsknechts to sew clothes, a kind of uniform. From then on, they were called the "Black Guard".

In late 1499, this guard, led by the elected commander Neidhart Fuchs, fought on the side of Magnus of Saxe-Lauenburg against the Archbishopric of Bremen, proving to be a real disaster. But in 1500, Magnus runs out of money, and the Landsknechts are hired by the Danish king.

By this time, the Black Guard reportedly numbered 3983 men, divided into 16 companies. The companies were commanded by captains, and the leader of all was Junker Thomas Slentz. By this time, the Landsknechts included not only representatives of Southern Germany, but also Dutch, Frisians, Scots, Lombards, and Flemings.

The Landsknechts' weapons consisted of the usual long pikes, halberds and two-handed swords of the time. There were also archers among them. The captains rode on horseback. Until then, the "Black Guard" had consistently defeated opponents whose main force was peasant militias. Therefore, it was believed that the armed peasants of Dithmarschen would not be a problem for them.

Peasant militia


The peasant republic could field about 6000 able-bodied men. And they were indeed able-bodied! They were free peasants accustomed to defending their property with weapons in their hands. As early as 1415, they were waging a bitter civil war with their northern neighbors, the Frisians. They were not afraid to enter into conflicts over property washed ashore ("coastal law") even with Hanseatic Hamburg itself. Many Ditmarschens served as mercenaries in the Hansa troops and thus had military experience. And their income allowed them to buy high-quality weapons and armor. Every Ditmarschen man, from the age of 15 until old age, was subject to military service and had to maintain his equipment in order. This was strictly checked at regular military reviews. The commander-in-chief and unit commanders were chosen from among the most respected members of the communities. The republic also had artillery - from 40 to 50 guns.

The militia's weapons and equipment were ideal for fighting on swampy marches. Their spears were not as long as those of the Landsknechts, but the peasants were masters of using them, including because these spears served as poles for jumping over irrigation canals. For this purpose, the spears had disc-shaped ends - so that they did not get stuck in the mud.

Note: The pike is the main weapon of the landsknechts.


The main weapon of the Landsknechts was the long spear Langspieß, later called a pike. (Translator's note: this weapon was also called the long spoke in the Russian army, in the regiments of the new (foreign) formation.)

Langspies is first mentioned in context Appenzell Wars (1401-1429).

The Swiss may have adopted it from the Italians. Long spears were known to have been made in Turin in 1330. In Basel there is a sculpture depicting a warrior with such a spear, dating back to 1370. From Switzerland this weapon spread to the German lands.

The length of the langspies, or pike, was 5-6 meters. It was crowned with a 16-18-centimeter tip. The length of the pike had to exceed that of knightly spears. Only this could protect the infantry from cavalry. Despite such impressive dimensions, the weapon was not that heavy - the weight of the pike with an ash shaft was "only" 3,5 kg. This allowed it to be carried on long foot marches, although not on the shoulder, as is believed today. The swaying long pikes could clash with neighboring ones or even hit a comrade in the face. On the march, the pike was dragged along the ground, grasping the shaft under the tip. Emperor Maximilian drew up instructions for the use of the pike for his landsknechts. At the same time, we must not forget that pikemen were effective only in large, dense formations. A single fighter with such a weapon was powerless. In close combat, the pike was also useless. However, the pikemen's battle was practically invulnerable to heavy cavalry.


War in the marches


The natural conditions of Dithmarschen differ significantly from those of neighboring Holstein and Denmark. The soil of the marches provides good harvests, but this requires complex melioration measures. A system of canals is built to drain the water. Otherwise, the area turns into a swamp. These canals are difficult to notice in the dark, in fog or during snowfall. A person unfamiliar with the area is doomed to get lost there. The area is difficult to pass for troops, wagons, and guns, and therefore they are tied to a few roads that are easy to block, and it is very difficult to bypass the barriers. It is practically impossible to line up large infantry forces there in battle formation, let alone cavalry.

Another problem for the Danish king was the landsknechts themselves. If the feudal militias were free for the lord (although the time of their service was limited, as was the geography of their combat use), then the maintenance of an entire army of mercenaries cost a fortune. All this pushed the king to resolve the matter as quickly as possible.

The military campaign was originally planned for May, but for the above reasons it began in February. On February 11, 1500, Johann I's army crossed the border of Dithmarschen. The enemy did not try to meet the invaders directly at the border, but retreated on marches and held only key points in the region. The republic's authorities tried to evacuate the civilian population to the island of Büsum, but they were unable to do so completely.

The very next day, the Danish army occupies Windbergen without a fight, and a day later, Meldorf. They plant the royal banner, the Danebrog, on the church bell tower and begin to plunder the town and even the church. If we are to believe the sources of the opposing side, the invaders showed bestial cruelty and killed everyone in sight in order to break the fighting spirit of the defenders and force them to surrender. However, they achieved exactly the opposite - bitterness and a thirst for revenge.

February 17. "Wahr de Garr, de Bur de kumt!"



The expression in the section title, translated from the Old German dialect, means the following: "Beware, Landsknecht, the peasant is coming!" "Garr" - "Black Guard". It is believed that this was the battle cry of the Ditmarschens in battle.

The royal army remained in Meldorf until February 17, when Johann gave the order to advance. At that time, there was a thaw. The roads became impassable for the baggage train and artillery. The commander of the "Black Guard" Slentz tried to convince the king to wait, but Johann, who had more royal arrogance than common sense, remained inexorable. The army stretched out from Meldorf in a multi-kilometer intestine to the north, in the direction of Heide, and by the time the vanguard encountered the enemy, the tail of the column had not yet moved.


Map of the fighting and the Battle of Hemmingstedt in 1500. The Danish forces are shown in red and the forces of the peasant republic are shown in blue

As the Danish army began to move, the militia opened the dams, which were about three kilometers away. This, together with the rain that had been falling continuously all day, turned the roads into muddy paths and the entire area beyond them into a swamp. The drainage channels were filled to the brim and were impassable without bridges.

During the night, a little to the south of the settlement of Hemmingstedt, the defenders of Dithmarschen built trenches - earthen fortifications. The main part of the militia gathered here - about 3000 fighters under the command of Wulf Isebrandt.

The Black Guard, marching in the vanguard of the royal army, tried to take the trench on the move, but their attack was stifled. They were completely deprived of maneuver: the terrain on either side of the road was impassable, and the approaching Holstein militia was pushing them from behind. Small groups of Ditmarschang militiamen attacked the extended column from the flanks, inflicting significant losses on the army.

The King and Duke of Holstein were in the ranks of the cavalry, and so their orders reached the vanguard that had entered the battle with a delay. Soon the entire Danish army was subjected to flanking attacks. The militiamen had installed two small guns on the flanks of their fortification. It was easier for them, being in a fortified position, to keep their powder dry, unlike the arquebusiers of the landsknechts. Therefore, the losses of the attackers were significantly higher.

In response to the artillery bombardment, the attackers made another attempt to storm the trench, but it also ended in failure and significant losses. The death of the commanders was especially tragic: during the assault, not only several captains died, but also the royal governors Kummerdick and Erichs. The murder of Thomas Slentz was a real disaster. The commander, on horseback, inspired his fighters to storm, raising their fighting spirit. One of the militiamen, Long Reimer of Wimmerstedt (probably a fictional character), knocked Slentz off his horse with a halberd. Although Reimer did not manage to pierce the mercenary leader's armor right away, he finished him off by striking him with his halberd while he was lying on the ground.

It should be noted that Slentz was the only one of the opponents whom the Ditmarschens mentioned with respect in their folk songs - as a brave, albeit unlucky warrior.


Finale


Having repelled the third assault, the militiamen themselves launched a counterattack, which put the "guard" to flight. And for this there was only one direction - back, mixing up the ranks of the rest of the army. Inspired by their success, the militiamen continued the attack and, having reached the Holstein militia, began to exterminate it. Those who did not manage to escape died under the blows of the peasants or drowned in the swamp. The cavalry initially tried to hold back the fleeing infantrymen, but they began to push back the horsemen, and only after that did the knights decide to enter the battle themselves. But the militiamen, striking primarily at the horses, forced them out of the way, and then finished off the horsemen stuck in the mud.

The entire battle lasted about three hours.

The king and his brother the duke managed to escape, but both counts of Oldenburg, most of the officers of the guard, the royal standard-bearer Hans von Ahlefeld and many noble knights, such as Rantzau, Raventlow, Pogwich, met their death on the marshy plain. The Dithmarschens mercilessly killed everyone they could reach. They were not even tempted by the possible ransom for the noble prisoners. Only revenge!

The losses of the Danish-Holstein side were monstrous. Different sources estimate them from 4000 to 7000 people, among whom were 360 ​​nobles. The losses of the militia were 60 peasants and 8 mercenaries. Although this seems unlikely.

But even without the ransom, the peasants' spoils were enormous. The convoy and guns were captured. And the dead left on the battlefield did not go unnoticed by the peasants either. The capture of the royal banner, the Dannebrog, had great symbolic significance.

According to legend, the peasants buried only the common warriors, while the aristocrats were left to lie in the mud.

The main components of the militia's victory were their courage, good knowledge of the terrain and weather conditions.

After this defeat, the Danish king had to conclude a rather humiliating treaty with Lübeck and Hamburg, but this was not the biggest problem. Taking advantage of the weakening of Johann's power, Sweden broke away from him in 1501.

The years 1499-1500 were generally unsuccessful for the Landsknechts. They also suffered a number of defeats in the "Swiss War". But a couple of years later, they began to rapidly rise as a decisive military force. At the same time, the stereotypical external image of the Landsknecht was formed.

The peasant republic of Dithmarschen lasted for another half century. It was only in 1559 that it was conquered by Denmark.


The monument, erected in 1900, commemorates the sensational victory of the peasants, which secured the independence of their republic.

To this day, the Battle of Hemmingstedt is imprinted in the collective consciousness of the people of Dithmarschen. For the 400th anniversary of the event, a monument designed by the Kiel architect Wilhelm Voigt was erected there. In the center of the composition is a heavy boulder on four massive stone columns. The legendary battle cry of the peasants is carved into it: "Wahr de Garr, de Bur de kummt". The monument stands on a small hill with a good view of the surrounding landscape. The region is still predominantly agricultural, and today's farmers honor the memory of their heroic ancestors.
93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    4 September 2025 04: 20
    Thank you for translating the article, the topic is incredibly interesting! I read about this battle only briefly, I admit I didn't know the details.
    Now to the article. The carrying of pikes by landsknechts and Swiss remains debatable. For example, in the case of dragging the latter in columns during turns, it is inevitable that the ranks following behind will stumble. The intervals between ranks of 5 meters are questionable.
    1. +4
      4 September 2025 04: 34
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      The 5 meter intervals between the ranks raise doubts.

      2 meters forward, from under the armpit, 3 meters behind, dragging, already an interval of three meters. Again with some shifting of the ranks to the side, and here is an even smaller distance.
      1. -1
        4 September 2025 07: 48
        Well, try to drag a 3.5 kg pole under your arm. Will you be able to march at least 3-4 km? And then have some kind of fight with this pole? Or will your arms still hurt?
        1. +3
          4 September 2025 08: 10
          Quote: Illanatol
          Well, try to drag a 3.5 kg pole under your arm. Will you be able to march at least 3-4 km like that?

          It looks like you haven't even dragged boards to the dacha or anywhere else. Because under the armpit, it also means on the bend of the elbow, and not like a thermometer, one, but two, part of the weight, and a significant part falls on the dragging end...
          1. -1
            4 September 2025 09: 06
            I carried the boards more than once and I did so on my shoulder rather than dragging them.
            1. -4
              4 September 2025 09: 09
              Quote: Illanatol
              I carried the boards more than once and I did so on my shoulder rather than dragging them.

              And how many kilometers?
              1. -2
                4 September 2025 09: 19
                And how many kilometers did you drag boards? And over rough terrain? In the Middle Ages, there were problems with highways, however.
                And why weren't guns with baguettes dragged around in later times?
                They did carry it on the shoulder. Although such a gun with a bayonet weighed more than 3.5 kg.
                1. -3
                  4 September 2025 09: 55
                  Quote: Illanatol
                  And why weren't guns with baguettes dragged around in later times?

                  Because, suddenly, the gun is not 5 meters long.

                  Quote: Illanatol
                  How many kilometers did you drag the boards?

                  If they are long and heavy and there are many of them, then several meters and dragged and many times, but after all, an inch is 2 meters and even a five is 4 meters, not to mention 6 meters, they are very different.
                  But you didn't answer what kind of boards and how long and how far YOU carried Bravo on your shoulder? Oh yeah, and how many people in the line in front of you and behind you carried the same boards? Bravo and on your shoulder...
                  1. -2
                    4 September 2025 13: 29
                    And suddenly it's not the length that matters, but the mass, the weight. Carrying 3.5 kg on your shoulder is quite possible.
                    And why do you need these boards... I can easily carry a board, or rather a stick weighing 3.5 kg, on my shoulder for 20 km, if the terrain allows (in the forest it will really be difficult). And one more thing: it is not only the convenience of carrying that is important, but also the convenience and speed of bringing the weapon into combat position.
                    Here you are, walking in a squad of the same kind, dragging a pike behind you, tip forward. Suddenly a squad of enemy cavalry appears behind you. How quickly and conveniently can you bring the pike into combat position? If you carry it on your shoulder, tip up, then there will be no problems. Take it as needed with both hands, turn around and tilt the tip in the right direction. But try to do this with a club, which is mostly behind your back. And other poor fellows walking in a column will at the same time be turning their poles to point them at the enemy. It won’t work out very conveniently or quickly.
                    If you carry a weapon on your shoulder at an angle with the tip up, you won't bother anyone and no one will bother you. And it's safe, you won't poke anyone with the tip.
                    1. -1
                      5 September 2025 04: 10
                      Quote: Illanatol
                      And suddenly it's not the length that matters, but the mass, the weight. Carrying 3.5 kg on your shoulder is quite possible.

                      It's funny that the length doesn't matter when carrying. There is such a thing as inertia and moment of mass. And even when just walking, a long board on your shoulder will torture you, whether you carry it horizontally or, especially, close to vertical.
                      And also, you will be tormented to throw it from shoulder to shoulder, because the hand up to hold the load on the shoulder is a noticeable effort. And 3,5 kg simply squeeze the muscles above the collarbone, not immediately but surely.

                      Quote: Illanatol
                      But try doing this with a club that is mostly behind your back.
                      That's why I doubted that you had anything to do with boards at all. Because it's easy to pull a light board/club from under your armpit and up with both hands... Try it.

                      Quote: Illanatol
                      If you carry a weapon on your shoulder at an angle with the tip pointing up, you won’t bother anyone and no one will bother you.
                      Only it doesn't last long. And under the arm the tip of course looks up somewhat dangerously, but this can be compensated by the cover, and is definitely compensated by the tail behind, forcing you to keep your distance.
      2. +5
        4 September 2025 07: 51
        2 meters forward, from under the armpit, 3 meters behind, dragging, already an interval of three meters.

        The article states otherwise,
        During the campaign, the pike was dragged along the ground, grasped by the shaft under the tip.

        I think something else is more realistic: long pikes were carried in pairs on the shoulder, with their belongings hanging in the middle. The hoplites of the Macedonian phalanxes did the same thing on campaigns.
        1. 0
          4 September 2025 08: 07
          Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
          The article states otherwise,

          Well, it is stated, and then immediately disputed, including by you.

          Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
          The hoplites of the Macedonian phalanxes acted similarly during campaigns.

          Maybe so, but this way the distance won’t be much shorter, and the points and opposite ends of the spears will certainly pose a danger to the neighbors.
          1. -1
            4 September 2025 09: 22
            The only way to prevent injury to neighbors from the tip is to point the tips upwards (at a convenient angle). If you drag, then if the person walking in front suddenly stops, the latter may run into the tip.
          2. 0
            4 September 2025 10: 27
            Dear Vladimir, no way. You and I don't know the truth and that's why we are debating the topic of the question.

            ...and the tips and opposite ends of the spears will certainly pose a danger to the neighbors.

            Moreover, on both sides, the pikes of the Swiss and the bands of landsknechts had a flow.
            Here we need to stir up the structure of the gangs (companies) of the Black Guards a little. Initially, the number of pikemen in their ranks was about half, a quarter were armed with halberds and axes, the remaining quarter consisted of crossbowmen, arquebusiers, swordsmen on double pay and gunners. Later, the number of pikemen decreased, the number of arquebusiers, on the contrary, increased.
            Towards the end of its history, only the first rank of the battle had pikes instead of two or even three earlier.
            In fact, this is reflected in the Spanish tercios, which were created in the image and likeness of gangs... thus, there were not very many pikemen as such, which made it possible to form a column.
            In the 30-year war, the latter already used slingshots, which were carried in the baggage train. Perhaps, similarly, pikes were carried in carts before that. In any case, it is better than dragging or carrying.
            1. +2
              4 September 2025 10: 36
              Frankly speaking, going into historical details is not my thing, here I can only rely on your knowledge. But. Purely mechanically, it takes a long time for one person to move a long stick, it is more convenient to drag it. And the baggage train is good, but pikes in the baggage train, when there is a threat of a sudden cavalry attack, and a cavalry ambush is a classic, these pikes, consider that they do not exist...
            2. -2
              4 September 2025 13: 37
              Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
              Moreover, on both sides, the pikes of the Swiss and the bands of landsknechts had a flow.


              And this inlet, by the way, could also serve as a counterweight, so that the long end of the spear with the tip would not weigh too much if it was carried on the shoulder.
        2. -4
          4 September 2025 13: 34
          I can give the hoplites some belated advice. lol
          To ensure the safety of such a transfer, two sarissas should be placed side by side in a valet and tied together near the edges (to quickly cut the ropes in case of emergency). Then the tips will not protrude, they will be at the same level as the blunt end of the second spear. The likelihood of injury will be greatly reduced.
    2. -1
      4 September 2025 08: 47
      The easiest way is to carry a pike on your shoulder. To drag it? In a column, this is nonsense, and here you definitely can't avoid leg injuries. But if you're afraid of pikes getting caught or getting injured, then it's easier to hold the pike near the tip and with the butt up. And there's nothing to catch on to, and if you fall asleep on the march, you won't seriously injure anyone.
      1. -3
        4 September 2025 09: 26
        Considering the stated length, it is very inconvenient. You hold it at waist level, just above the tip. How long will the blunt end of the pike hang over your shoulder? Again, the tip is at the bottom, at an angle, and can hit someone walking in front. If you lower the tip lower, it can touch the ground on an uneven surface, which can cause problems for the pikeman himself.
      2. +2
        4 September 2025 10: 34
        Hello Victor.
        The peak had a spout at the opposite end.
        Otherwise, I agree, if you want to live, you won’t spread yourself like that.
        1. 0
          4 September 2025 10: 50
          Hi. The pointed pin on the butt is small, not sharp, and cannot catch on neighboring ones. And it was not always there or was simply replaced by sharpening the shaft. . But in general, I think that at crossings pikes were carried in carts, and if they were carried on the shoulder, then it is unlikely that anyone was very worried about injuries - this was a fighter's problem.
          1. -4
            4 September 2025 13: 40
            On long marches, on the march - of course they carried them, as well as other weapons. But when they approached the place of the rendezvous with the enemy, they still carried the weapons themselves. The enemy might not allow them to take the weapons from the carts with a surprise attack.
    3. 0
      4 September 2025 09: 47
      The carrying of pikes by landsknechts and Swiss remains debatable. For example, in the case of dragging the latter in columns during turns, it is inevitable that the ranks following behind will stumble. The intervals between ranks of 5 meters are questionable.

      On the march, the pike was carried as it was convenient. In battle formation, the pikes were held strictly vertically. Just before the clash, the pike was lowered. No contradictions.
      1. +1
        4 September 2025 10: 38
        Hi Denis!
        In combat formation, the pikes were held strictly vertically.

        There were even scientific studies by medieval military leaders who believed that a cannonball hitting a forest of peaks lost its lethal force and fell to the ground.
        1. +1
          4 September 2025 13: 28
          Good afternoon,

          I haven't seen the core and I think it's too much. In modern historiography there was a point of view that the forest of peaks can be effective against arrows
  2. +5
    4 September 2025 06: 51
    It is interesting to consider the Dithmarschen region during the Nazi era, when after the dam was built and part of the land was drained, a land reclamation project was carried out called Adolf Hitler Koog, aimed at creating new peasant settlements with typical German Frisian farmhouses with tiled roofs. Moreover, when distributing the land, the inhabitants of this new piece of land reclaimed from the sea were to be the native inhabitants of Dithmarschen, who were necessarily members of the Nazi party. It is quite clear that this was a propaganda and demonstration project of the National Socialist Party, conditioned more by ideology than by the real needs of agriculture. Thanks to the author...
  3. +4
    4 September 2025 07: 29
    My respects to the author! Very interesting!
    + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
  4. +5
    4 September 2025 07: 32
    Is there a way to give the article a + (plus) here, does anyone know?
    It's just that sometimes they write very interesting things, but how can you thank the author for their writing work?
    1. +7
      4 September 2025 08: 46
      Asterisk at the end of the article
      1. +1
        4 September 2025 09: 26
        And thank you!
        I've been at VO for so many years, and I only found out about the star today.
    2. 0
      4 September 2025 09: 13
      Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
      Is there a way to give the article a + (plus) here, does anyone know?
      It's just that sometimes they write very interesting things, but how can you thank the author for their writing work?

      There is an asterisk under the article.
    3. +1
      4 September 2025 14: 56
      Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
      How can I thank the author for his writing work?

      at the bottom of the article there is a red star marked "important", but it seems that it is used for exactly this purpose wink
  5. +5
    4 September 2025 07: 43
    Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
    My respects to the author! Very interesting!
    Never heard of such a republic. I agree!
  6. -3
    4 September 2025 07: 45
    This allowed it to be carried on long marches, although not on the shoulder, as is now believed. The swaying long pikes could clash with neighboring ones or even hit a comrade in the face. On the march, the pike was dragged along the ground, grasped by the shaft under the tip.


    It would be nice to provide evidence for this. Well, a picture, an engraving from that time. Why on earth should the pikes interlock if carried on the shoulder? After all, a spear/pike should not be carried horizontally on the shoulder, but at an angle of 60 degrees, with the tip up. This is the most convenient, and this is how rifles with bayonets were carried. And dragging this pole along the ground will get you tired, especially if the road is not level.

    And yes, to exceed the length of knightly spears, you don't need to have 5-6 meters, you can have shorter ones. When defending, a foot soldier could rest the blunt end on the ground, which made his position more solid. And he didn't have to hold the pike by the middle, you can hold it closer to the blunt end. The knight held the spear in the air and approximately by the middle. Moreover, the vulnerable spot of the "knight-horse" combat system was precisely the horse's muzzle and chest. Yes, they tried to cover them with armor, but how effective the armor was is a question.

    By the way, those who were walking behind, couldn't they accidentally step on the blunt end that was dragging on the ground? Maintaining a strict interval is not always possible even for those who are well trained in drill. It is hard to believe in the training of the militia.
    1. +4
      4 September 2025 08: 06
      The knight held the spear at arm's length and approximately at the middle.
      The knight's spear, about 3-3,5 meters long, was held in the last third of this length. Otherwise, the meaning of caching and ramming is lost.
      1. -2
        4 September 2025 09: 15
        Even if it is so. It means that approximately 2 (or a little more) meters protrude forward (in relation to the rider's body). The length of the pike of 5-6 meters still turns out to be excessive.

        I can't say about ramming, but the ramming attack will not lose its meaning, even if you hold the spear in the front third. But you need to take into account that the ramming attack is a one-time action. To repeat it, the knight needs to pick up speed again. And if you get stuck in the foot formation - how to do this? And yes, horses do not have a reverse gear. That is, you need to turn your back to the enemy, drive away a few dozen meters to pick up speed and attack with a ram again. But the enemy, if not a complete moron, may not give you the opportunity to make such a maneuver.

        Ramming attacks (not as impressive as they seem) are more the preserve of knightly duels than of real battles.
        1. +6
          4 September 2025 09: 24
          A peak length of 5-6 meters still turns out to be excessive.
          The length of the pike is due to the fact that not only the first line of fighters but also the second and third ones fight at the same time.
          1. -3
            4 September 2025 09: 32
            That makes sense, okay. Although one rank would have been enough. The infantry formation is denser, about three infantrymen with pikes against one horseman.
            When two or three ranks fight at the same time, they need to coordinate their actions so that their pikes do not interfere with each other, do not collide, and do not interfere with each other. I hope the pikemen did not just put out their weapons, but struck with them? And the latter required some training, education. Who trained these militiamen and when?
            1. +4
              4 September 2025 09: 51
              Who trained these militiamen and when?
              5-6-meter pikes are not about militias, but about professionals. Militias had shorter spears, and the article directly states this.
            2. +1
              4 September 2025 09: 55
              Nobody trained. And the first Landsknechts were not trained. And the early Swiss.
              Learning on the job. Trial and error
              1. 0
                4 September 2025 13: 19
                Well, well. I suspect that the "dropout" rate during this type of training was quite high.
                If no one taught you, then you taught yourself. Maybe you used spears for hunting or something like that. Going into battle with a weapon you don't know how to use isn't very smart.
                If we talk about peasants, it is more logical to use weapons that have civilian analogues that peasants used in their work. A flail as an analogue of a "morgenstern", a regular axe as an analogue of a battle axe, a hunting bow as an analogue of a battle bow, etc.
                1. +2
                  4 September 2025 13: 41
                  There are two aspects - weapon possession and marching in formation.
                  There was no training in either.
                  The main weapon in Switzerland in the 14th century was the halberd, which was replaced by the pike from the first half of the 15th century, so that in the last quarter of the century the pike was already dominant (somewhere around 3/4 of the weapons)
                  The Landsknechts were created from the very beginning with the Swiss in mind and already had a decent number of pikes.
                  Anton is right when he says that the spread of peaks can be linked to growing professionalism.
                  However, it is important to understand that "professionals" are yesterday's peasants and townspeople who took part in several battles and decided that fighting is more fun.
                  Knights in command positions ensured discipline, stability and control of such masses.
                  1. -3
                    4 September 2025 14: 32
                    How do we know that there was no training? From what sources? If no one wrote about it, it doesn't mean that there was no training. Battles didn't take up much time for mercenaries, so what did they do in between? Drank vodka and ran after girls? Training is still necessary, otherwise where would professionalism come from? A couple of battles - and "take away the finished one."

                    You need to know how to use a halberd or a pike. Skill and professionalism alone will not come.
                    1. 0
                      4 September 2025 14: 45
                      There are enough sources for the 15th and especially the 16th century. Memoir literature, leaflets, pamphlets, official records, chronicles.
                      From memory, techniques with a pike were described only in the second half of the 16th century. Around the same time, the marching step appeared.
                      It is impossible to prove something that did not happen. They always prove something that was or could have been.
                      The necessity of training is your thesis. It is up to you to prove it. And no other way.
                      1. -1
                        5 September 2025 08: 17
                        Quote: Engineer
                        From memory, techniques with a pike were described only in the second half of the 16th century.


                        Ah, they are described. Did those who described them make them up? Or did they just describe what had been practiced for decades? I wonder in what century the first manual on how to plow the land with a plough was written?

                        The need for training - I don't see the point in proving it. It's quite obvious to me.
                        Otherwise, as in the old joke:

                        - Do you know how to play the violin?
                        - I don’t know, I haven’t tried... laughing
                    2. +3
                      4 September 2025 14: 55
                      What did they do in between? Drink vodka and run after girls?
                      Exactly!
                      1. -1
                        5 September 2025 08: 13
                        If that were the case, there would be no real professionalism to come from. An inept fighter would become humus in his first battle against knights who had been trained in the military craft from a young age.

                        "It's hard to learn, easy to fight." Suvorov didn't come up with this, this truth was known in ancient times. And everyone wants to live, however. And he understands that the more skillfully he wields a weapon, the less chance he has of being sent to mincemeat.
                    3. 0
                      16 December 2025 19: 17
                      Just because no one wrote about it doesn't mean there was no training. Battles didn't take up much of the mercenaries' time, so what did they do in between?

                      Teaching martial arts to peasants in those days was like teaching slaves in Ancient Rome. Spartacus is proof of that; it would come back to bite them later.
                      Gladiators are slaves for the arena, not a militia who shed the blood of others under the guard of armed Romans for entertainment, as has been the case everywhere and throughout history. Even nunchakus are not the "standard" weapon of warriors.
                      Mercenaries needed money for training, and where did the peasants get it? Those mentioned in the article were an exception. Those who had money simply didn't want to risk being turned against them in the event of an uprising or rebellion.
                      So, no one gave professional training or preparation to the militia (mostly ordinary people, peasants).
                      1. 0
                        17 December 2025 13: 09
                        1. Spartacus wasn't a slave; Roman sources didn't mention this. They only mentioned that there were slaves in his army. Spartacus himself was most likely a noble Roman and former officer who was sent to the gladiators as punishment. This explains how this "slave" was able to create a combat-ready army in such a short time. "Spartacus" isn't a name, but rather his specialty in the arena. This "Spartacus" fought on horseback (spartacus translates as "one who tramples with hooves").
                        2. It's hard to tell who became a mercenary and how. They could be "combat serfs," trained by the feudal lord himself for use. Do you think all these knights fought on their own? Even a common knight commanded a unit, the so-called "lance." And who made up this unit, and where were the men recruited for it? A knight could die, and his soldiers could later become mercenaries. And if someone needed mercenary soldiers, that someone trained them, using their own money. Usually, it wasn't the mercenaries who paid the mercenaries; they were paid. Where does the word "soldier" come from? From "soldo," the coin used to pay mercenaries. Even some impoverished nobles became mercenaries, as did younger sons who inherited only a noble title.

                        In addition, wealthy peasants, artisans, merchants, or rather their grown-up children, who liked fighting more than sitting in a shop or plowing the land, could also become mercenaries.
                        So, commoners were given vocational training. Over time, this practice would expand, and kings would acquire a permanent army, with which they would bring the wayward feudal lords to heel.

                        3. Militias typically used weapons with civilian equivalents. This was especially true in our country. The battle axe had a counterpart in the common axe, the battle fork wasn't much different from the hunting fork, and the battle and hunting bows weren't all that different either. And yes, nunchucks... the same flail for threshing. We had "nunchucks" too, just larger. And the flail (not much different) was still used by bandits in the 19th century.
                      2. 0
                        17 December 2025 21: 47
                        Regarding all three of your points, the answer is simple: the militia is not a professionally trained regular army. That's the point of what I wrote. They didn't have the training that those who could be trusted received—that is, an army that is on the ruler's payroll, receives a salary, and after service, benefits that peasants would never receive. That's why they were called a militia; now they're conscripts who serve for a couple of years and are sent home, and they won't be taught everything, only superficially. And the fact that peasants could join the regular army is self-evident. The knights weren't commanding strangers, but rather men who were dependent on them, living on their land with their parents, wives, and children. If they were trained at all, it was primarily to protect the knight in battle, not his land and property in war. You have an overly righteous approach to that time, which is understandable, since in our time, we haven't encountered the conditions slaves and peasants lived in, toiling for their masters for generations, both before and after their birth. But the reality was harsh and very cunning, insightful, and the gap between the different classes was enormous. They didn't teach everything, only basic knowledge, and only when it was profitable, when their own property was under threat of seizure.
                        Regarding mercenaries, I simply wrote that they had to be paid, and for that fee, they would train anyone the payer indicated. It didn't matter who the mercenaries were—former soldiers, commanders, or criminals. As for Spartacus, no one can say for sure who he was, the same goes for his comrades, as well as whether he immediately became a gladiator or was forced to serve as a slave. Slaves in Rome varied, and it's true that he certainly wasn't a free citizen.
            3. +2
              4 September 2025 11: 16
              That makes sense, okay. Although one rank would have been enough. The infantry formation is denser, about three infantrymen with pikes against one horseman.

              Not immediately, but they came to this. Knights were not stupid either and transformed into "cuirassiers" who used a pair of pistols, not a spear, and only then cut through with an espadron or broadsword.
              1. +2
                4 September 2025 11: 21
                who used a pair of pistols,
                Four to six.
                1. +2
                  4 September 2025 11: 24
                  Quote: 3x3zsave
                  who used a pair of pistols,
                  Four to six.

                  This is already at the peak of the development of the weapon. Then the prototypes of musketoons with the ability to shoot buckshot appear.
              2. -2
                4 September 2025 13: 43
                A reasonable answer would be crossbowmen behind pikemen, and later, riflemen with muskets.
  7. +4
    4 September 2025 07: 49
    By the way, it was in Dithmarschen that Karsten Rode, a naval privateer in the service of Ivan the Terrible, was born. It is clear that the translation, the article is original, there is no depth. It would be even more interesting if the original told about the peasant republic of Dithmarschen. It is quite interesting.
  8. +5
    4 September 2025 08: 40
    The tactics of the Ditmarschens are very reminiscent of Robert the Bruce's actions at Loudoun Hill.
    Thanks to the author and translator!
    1. +3
      4 September 2025 10: 09
      Similar problems imply similar solutions
      1. +3
        4 September 2025 10: 13
        At Loudoun Hill the situation was completely paradoxical. The English had driven themselves into a trap by having previously agreed with Bruce on the location of the battle.
  9. +5
    4 September 2025 08: 43
    Damn! I knew the main fight would be about the way the spades were carried! I should have skipped that part altogether.
    1. +3
      4 September 2025 08: 56
      Damn! I knew the main fight would be about the way the spades were carried.
      What is remarkable is that none of the disputants held a pike in their hands. And in the museum, where such weapons can be seen, was about ten years ago.
      1. +4
        4 September 2025 10: 57
        Quote: 3x3zsave
        Damn! I knew the main fight would be about the way the spades were carried.
        What is remarkable is that none of the disputants held a pike in their hands. And in the museum, where such weapons can be seen, was about ten years ago.

        Buddy, are you offending me?
        About 15 years ago, I even had the chance to stand in battle, only not with the Landsknechts, but with the Swiss with a replica of a pike.
        It's a pity that the historical club later fell apart. Most of them went into worshiping the Romanov dynasty and don't "play" any other way than as hussars and cavalry guards. After criticizing Nicholas II, I became a dirty dog. Some use the Scandinavian theme or the shoulder pad, the latter in defiance of the majority of the French. People sometimes turn to me for advice on the topic of "wooden pieces", out of old habit.
        1. +2
          4 September 2025 11: 02
          Hello, Vlad!
          I always advocate that controversial issues be resolved empirically.
          Experience is the criterion of truth!
          1. +2
            4 September 2025 12: 05
            My snow shovel has a 3-meter "shaft" made of birch with a thickness of 40 mm. In fact, the limit of my physical capabilities. A 6-meter ash pike with a shaft of variable thickness from 35 to 40 mm will weigh 3-3,5 kg. Plus a tip with a 1-1,5 kg inlet. In this case, the pike will not bend, or only slightly.
            My friend went to Crimea, there in the monastery of the Holy Cross of the 14th century I photographed an interesting artifact, I'm curious about your opinion.
            1. +2
              4 September 2025 12: 08
              Made a mistake with the photo!
              ...............
            2. +2
              4 September 2025 12: 10
              Is this Feodosia? The object on the left is a real vulture!
              1. +2
                4 September 2025 14: 13
                I'm talking about the same thing and this was found on the territory of an Armenian monastery.
                The artifact itself is not signed, it was in a display case of monks' tools!!! With picks, sickles and mallets!!!
                Model of the monastery.
                1. +2
                  4 September 2025 14: 21
                  This is a find on the territory of an Armenian monastery.
                  Damn, and I wondered what was left of the Genoese.
                  1. +1
                    4 September 2025 17: 54
                    It's about 30-40 kilometers straight to Sudak (Koffu).
            3. -2
              4 September 2025 13: 46
              The parameters of the pike specified in the article were exceeded. The total weight is indicated as 3.5 kg. Either the shaft was thinner or the tip was lighter.
    2. +3
      4 September 2025 08: 58
      So what's wrong with that? More comments, higher traffic.
    3. +4
      4 September 2025 09: 42
      Quote: Slug_BDMP
      I should have skipped this part altogether.

      In no case))
      Let the people flood feel
    4. +3
      4 September 2025 09: 52
      Quite the opposite. This means that this moment is especially interesting.
      1. +3
        4 September 2025 10: 38
        Quote: Engineer
        Quite the opposite. This means that this moment is especially interesting.

        A long club in the hands of a Russian is appropriate in any system! laughing
        1. -1
          4 September 2025 13: 48
          The Russians used shorter and heavier spears. Still, a too-long but flimsy club doesn't rule. Again, a civilian equivalent. To go after a bear with a 5-meter thin stick is to become a Darwin Prize laureate.
          1. +2
            4 September 2025 14: 16
            No one went after the bear with spears; the spear and its subspecies were in use not only among our ancestors, but throughout Europe and beyond.
            1. -1
              4 September 2025 14: 22
              That's exactly it. And the spear is that heavy and short (about 2.5 m) spear that I wrote about above. And the hunting spear was not that different from the combat one. Those who are used to handling one will be quite good with the other.

              But for a person (a professional landsknecht) to learn how to handle a 6-meter pike, training is still needed. I don't know of any civilian analogues of such weapons, and it's unlikely that there were any. So - training almost from scratch.
              Or did the Macedonians also learn to use their sarissas in combat conditions? However, it is unlikely.
    5. +4
      4 September 2025 10: 45
      Quote: Slug_BDMP
      Damn! I knew the main fight would be about the way the spades were carried! I should have skipped that part altogether.

      There is no squabble, dear Translator, there is a discussion! My personal merci with a tail for the work done!!! hi
  10. +2
    4 September 2025 09: 04
    For this purpose, the spears had disc-shaped ends so that they would not get stuck in the mud.
    Apparently some kind of endemic. I have been interested in bladed weapons for many years and have never seen anything like it. I wonder if any examples have survived?
    1. +2
      4 September 2025 11: 09
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      For this purpose, the spears had disc-shaped ends so that they would not get stuck in the mud.
      Apparently some kind of endemic. I have been interested in bladed weapons for many years and have never seen anything like it. I wonder if any examples have survived?

      Anton is just a thickening on the shaft (2-3 cm wider in diameter than the shaft) and nothing more.
      1. +2
        4 September 2025 18: 07
        No, Vlad, these are probably really rondel podtok. I remembered what other weapon they were used on, it was the alshpis. However, due to the length of the tip, it is unlikely that you can jump over channels with the help of the alshpis.
        1. +1
          4 September 2025 20: 33
          Anton, you know better. Which of us is the expert in the field of cold weapons!
  11. +3
    4 September 2025 09: 42
    It seems that on a long march, in safe territory, the pikes rode in the convoy.
    I can't vouch for my memory, but it seems that this is how it was in the Russian army.
    1. +2
      4 September 2025 11: 02
      That's right, although our riflemen and soldiers did not shy away from carrying poles for slingshots on their backs.
    2. 0
      5 September 2025 08: 08
      Well, it’s safe... but what if the territory suddenly turns out to be dangerous if reconnaissance missed the enemy’s approach?
      As it happened at the Piana River, shortly before the Battle of Kulikovo.
  12. +3
    4 September 2025 11: 05
    In Russian, this term usually refers to low-lying strips of the sea coast that are subject to high tides or surges of sea water.
    It's amazing - sea salt water creates fertile soil - I know the mechanism, but still...

    Even more surprising are the people who managed to live well and get rich in this swamp, without allowing the soil to become saline...
    1. +3
      4 September 2025 11: 55
      Even more surprising are the people who managed to live well and get rich in this swamp. preventing soil salinization...

      This is exactly what surprised me in the article, how did you achieve this?
      loess deposits during river flooding - understandable, but how do marine deposits not salinize the soil?
      1. +4
        4 September 2025 13: 01
        It can be assumed that the salinity of water in the Baltic and North Seas is very low
        1. -2
          4 September 2025 13: 50
          True, especially along the coast, at the mouths of rivers. Settlements, as a rule, were in such places.
        2. ANB
          +1
          5 September 2025 00: 36
          . the salinity of water in the Baltic and North Sea is very low

          In the Baltic - yes. Almost fresh. But in the North Sea (and already in the Danish Straits) - already salty. I once foolishly tried to wash my hair with seawater, right in the Danish Straits. So I walked around with a mohawk until they brought fresh water. :)
          The question of non-salinization of the soil also seemed interesting to me. Maybe, like on the Neva, it wasn't a sea that overflowed, but a river whose drainage was periodically blocked?
      2. -1
        4 September 2025 13: 44
        Quote: Dedok
        This is exactly what surprised me in the article, how did you achieve this?

        me too.

        They write what exactly regular The ebb and flow of sea water prevents the accumulation of salts (there is constant washing and their accumulation does not occur). Plus, plants draw out minerals. Algae brought by the tide created a fertile layer.

        People, as I see, managed to preserve the system, preventing the accumulation of salt.
      3. +2
        4 September 2025 14: 48
        Groundwater, and there is a lot of it in swamps, has a flow towards unloading, towards the sea; sea water does not penetrate far into the ground even at high tides on land against this flow.
        1. +3
          4 September 2025 14: 49
          Groundwater, and there is a lot of it in swamps, has a flow towards unloading, towards the sea.

          thank you
        2. +1
          5 September 2025 10: 24
          Quote: Andobor
          Groundwater, and there is a lot of it in swamps, has a flow towards unloading, towards the sea, sea water does not penetrate into the ground even at high tides on land against this flow

          speech about marching soils (see article) - these are the soils of low sea coasts and deltas, which are formed under conditions periodic flooding by tidal or storm surge sea waters, that's where the swamp water comes from.