"Historically, these are originally Slavic lands"

24 241 62
"Historically, these are originally Slavic lands"
Königsberg Castle, photo from the beginning of the 20th century


Prussia-Porussia


Since ancient times, Prussia-Porussia was part of the vast Slavic-Russian world (superethnos of the Rus), and it was inhabited by Slavic-Russian clans - Porussians (Prussians, Borossians, Borussians). Later, the Porussians living on the shores of the Venedian Sea - the Wends are one of the names of the Slavic-Rus inhabiting Central Europe (Vandal Rus'; Germanic Rus'), Western "historians" rewriting history To meet the needs of the Romano-Germanic world, they were included in the Balts.



In fact, this is a lie aimed at distorting the True history of the Russian super-ethnos ("Slavic Atlantis" in Central Europe). The Balts were the last to separate from the single superethnos of the Rus. Even in the 13th-14th centuries, the Baltic tribes worshiped gods common with the Rus, the cult of Perun-Perkunas and Veles was especially powerful. The spiritual and material culture of the Rus (Slavs) and the Balts was almost indistinguishable.

Lithuanian Rus' - the Russian Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Russia - was a Russian state where the Russian population was predominant. Only after the Baltic tribes were Christianized and Germanized, suppressed by the matrix of Western civilization, were they separated from the superethnos of the Rus'.

Now the Baltics, forcibly torn away from the united Russian civilization in 1991, are simply dying out, without any bright prospects.

The Prussians-Porussians were almost completely exterminated, as they put up an extremely stubborn resistance to the crusaders. The remnants were assimilated, losing their memory, culture and language (finally in the 18th century). Just as the related Slavic-Russian clans of the Lyutichi and Obodrichi were exterminated before that.

Even during the centuries-long battle for Central Europe, where the western branch of the Rus super-ethnos lived (for example, few people know that Berlin, Vienna, Brandenburg or Dresden were founded by the Rus Slavs), many Slavs fled to Prussia and Lithuania, as well as to the Novgorod land.

And the Novgorod Slovenes had millennia-long ties with the Rus of Central Europe, which is confirmed by anthropology, archeology, mythology and linguistics. It is not surprising that it was the Western Russian prince Rurik-Sokol who was invited to Ladoga. He was no stranger to the Novgorod land. And during the battle of the Prussians and other Baltic Slavs with the Western "dog-knights", Novgorod supported its relatives, supplied weapon.

In Rus', the memory of a common origin with the Porussians (Borussians) was preserved for a long time. The great princes of Vladimir traced their origins to the Rus (Prussians) of Ponemanye. Ivan the Terrible, an encyclopedist of his era who had access to chronicles and annals that have not reached our time (or were destroyed and hidden), wrote about this.

Many noble families of Rus' traced their lineage back to Prussia. Thus, according to family legend, the ancestors of the Romanovs came to Rus' "from Prussia". The Prussians lived along the Rossa (Rusa) River, as the Neman was called in its lower reaches (today the name of one of the river's branches has been preserved - Rus, Rusn, Rusne).

Koenigsberg


In the 13th century, the Prussian lands were conquered by the Teutonic Order. The Prussians were partly exterminated, partly driven into neighboring regions, partly reduced to the status of slaves. The population was Christianized and assimilated. The last speakers of the Prussian language disappeared at the beginning of the 18th century.

Königsberg was founded on a hill on the high right bank of the lower reaches of the Pregel River on the site of a Prussian settlement in 1255. On the site of the future city was the Lipnik settlement (the future German-Prussian Löbenicht), a stream flowed near the settlement and the Dubovy Les castle was located.

The Czech King Přemysl Otakar and the Grand Master of the Teutonic Order Poppo von Ostern founded the Order fortress of Königsberg. This word meant "Royal Castle" or "Royal Shore". The Poles and Czechs called it Krúlúvgród - Royal Castle, Krúlevec, Kralovec. In Russian sources up until the beginning of the 20th century it was called Korolevec (Korolevec) or Korolevic.

The troops of the Czech king came to the aid of the knights who were suffering defeat at the hands of the local population, who, in turn, were invited to Prussia by the Polish king to fight the pagans.

Strategic springboard for the “onslaught to the East”


Prussia became a strategic foothold for the West in the fight against Russian civilization for a long time. First, the Teutonic Order fought against Rus-Russia, including Lithuanian Rus (a Russian state in which the official language was Russian), then Prussia and the German Empire.

In 1812, East Prussia became the location of a powerful concentration of French troops for the campaign in Russia, shortly before which Napoleon arrived in Königsberg, where he held the first reviews of the troops. The French troops also included Prussian units.

During the First and Second World Wars, East Prussia was again a springboard for aggression against Russia and repeatedly became the scene of brutal battles.

Rome, which had long been the main command post of Western civilization, acted on the principle of "divide and rule", pitting the peoples of the Slavic-Russian civilization against each other, weakening them and "absorbing" part by part. Some Slavic-Rus, like the Lyutichi and Prussians, were almost completely destroyed and assimilated. In particular, the current Germans of East Germany are genetically and anthropologically the overwhelming majority of former Rus, Slavs deprived of historical memory, who have become "mute".

Others, like the Western Poles – the Poles, Czechs, Croats – submitted to the Western “matrix”, becoming part of European civilization.

Similar processes have been observed in the last century in Little Rus' (Little Russia-Ukraine), they have accelerated especially in the last three decades. The West has turned the southern branch of Russians (Little Russians) into "Ukrainians" - ethnographic mutants, "Russian Janissaries" who have lost the memory of their origins, are quickly losing their native language and culture. Instead, a death program is loaded, "Ukrainians" hate everything Russian, Russians and become the spearhead of the West for further offensive on the lands of Russian civilization, the superethnos of Russians-Rus. The masters of the West have set them one goal - to die in battle with their brothers, weakening the Russian civilization with their death.

Historical memory has been lost, the language has been greatly distorted, but the fighting qualities of the Rus have been preserved - they are stubborn, desperate ("Russians do not surrender!"), resourceful. So the Rus are cutting down Rus to the delight of the masters of London, Brussels, Paris and Washington.

The first time Königsberg almost became Russian again was during the Seven Years' War, when Russia and Prussia were enemies. In 1758, Russian troops entered Königsberg. The city's residents swore allegiance to the Russian Empress Elizabeth Petrovna. Until 1762, the city belonged to Russia. East Prussia had the status of a Russian governorate-general.

However, after the death of Empress Elizabeth, Peter III came to power. Once in power, Emperor Peter III, who did not hide his admiration for the Prussian King Friedrich II, immediately ceased military actions against Prussia and concluded the Treaty of St. Petersburg with the Prussian King on extremely unfavorable terms for Russia. Pyotr Fyodorovich returned to Prussia the conquered East Prussia (which by that time had already been an integral part of the Russian Empire for four years) and renounced all acquisitions during the Seven Years' War, which Russia had practically won. All the sacrifices, all the heroism of the Russian soldiers, all the successes were crossed out in one fell swoop.

Stalin proposes to hand over East Prussia to Russia


During World War II, East Prussia was a strategic bridgehead of the Third Reich for aggression against Poland and the Soviet Union. East Prussia had a developed military infrastructure and industry. It housed the bases of the German Air Force and Navy, which allowed to control most of the Baltic Sea. Prussia was one of the most important areas of the German military industrial complex.

The Soviet Union suffered enormous losses during the war, both human and material. It is not surprising that Moscow insisted on compensation. The war with Germany was far from over, but Stalin looked to the future and expressed the Soviet Union's claims to East Prussia. On December 16, 1941, during negotiations in Moscow with A. Eden, Stalin proposed to attach a secret protocol to the draft treaty on joint actions (they were not signed), which proposed separating East Prussia and transferring part of it with Königsberg to the USSR for a period of twenty years as a guarantee of compensation for the losses incurred by the USSR from the war with Germany.

At the Tehran Conference, in his speech on December 1, 1943, Stalin went further. Stalin emphasized:

The Russians do not have ice-free ports on the Baltic Sea. Therefore, the Russians need ice-free ports of Königsberg and Memel and the corresponding part of East Prussia. Moreover, historically, these are originally Slavic lands.

Judging by these words, the Soviet leader not only understood the strategic and economic importance of Königsberg, but also knew the true history of the region (which was set out by Lomonosov and other Russian historians who fought against the Western, Romano-Germanic – “classical” version of history). Indeed, East Prussia was “an original Slavic land.”

During a luncheon between the heads of government on November 30, Churchill stated that

Russia needs to have access to ice-free ports <…> the British have no objections to this.

In a letter to Churchill dated February 4, 1944, Stalin again addressed the problem of Königsberg:

As for your statement to the Poles that Poland could significantly expand its borders in the west and north, as you know, we agree with this with one amendment. I spoke about this amendment to you and the President in Tehran. We claim that the north-eastern part of East Prussia, including Königsberg, as an ice-free port, will go to the Soviet Union. This is the only piece of German territory that we claim. Without satisfying this minimal claim of the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union's concession expressed in the recognition of the Curzon Line loses all meaning, as I already told you in Tehran.

Moscow's position on the issue of East Prussia on the eve of the Crimean Conference is set out in a brief summary of the note of the Commission on Peace Treaties and Post-War Structure "On the Treatment of Germany" dated January 12, 1945:

1. Change of the borders of Germany. It is assumed that East Prussia will go partly to the USSR, partly to Poland, and Upper Silesia to Poland…

For a long time, Great Britain and the United States tried to push the idea of ​​decentralizing Germany, dismembering it into several state entities, including Prussia (How Stalin saved Germany from dismemberment).

At the Moscow Conference of the Foreign Ministers of the USSR, USA and Great Britain (October 19-30, 1943), British Foreign Secretary A. Eden outlined the British government’s plan for the future of Germany.

We would like, he said, the division of Germany into separate states, in particular we would like the separation of Prussia from the rest of Germany.

At the Tehran Conference, American President Roosevelt proposed discussing the question of dismembering Germany. He said that in order to "stimulate" discussion on this issue, he would like to present a "personally two months ago a plan to dismember Germany into five states" Thus, in his opinion,

Prussia must be weakened and reduced in size as much as possible. Prussia must form the first independent part of Germany…

Churchill put forward his plan for the dismemberment of Germany. He proposed, first of all, to "isolate" Prussia from the rest of Germany.

I would keep Prussia under harsh conditions,

— said the head of the British government.

Moscow was against the dismemberment of Germany and eventually achieved the cession of part of East Prussia. England and the United States agreed in principle to satisfy Moscow's proposals. In a message to I. V. Stalin, received in Moscow on February 27, 1944, Churchill indicated that the British government considered the transfer of Königsberg and the adjacent territory to the USSR

a just claim on the part of Russia... The soil of this part of East Prussia is stained with Russian blood, generously shed for the common cause... Therefore, the Russians have a historical and well-founded claim to this German territory.

In February 1945, the Crimean Conference took place, at which the leaders of the three allied powers practically resolved issues related to the future borders of Poland and the fate of East Prussia. During the negotiations, British Prime Minister W. Churchill and American President F. Roosevelt stated that, in principle, they were in favor of dismembering Germany. The British Prime Minister, in particular, once again developed his plan for the separation of Prussia from Germany and "the creation of another large German state in the south, whose capital could be in Vienna".

In connection with the discussion of the “Polish question” at the conference, it was essentially decided that

All of East Prussia should not be transferred to Poland. The northern part of this province with the ports of Memel and Königsberg should go to the USSR. The delegations of the USSR and the USA agreed to provide Poland with compensation "at the expense of Germany", namely: parts of East Prussia and Upper Silesia "up to the line of the Oder River".

Meanwhile, the Red Army had practically solved the issue of liberating East Prussia from the Nazis. As a result of successful offensives in the summer of 1944, Soviet troops liberated Belarus, part of the Baltics and Poland, and approached the German border in the area of ​​East Prussia. In October 1944, the Memel operation was carried out. Soviet troops not only liberated part of Lithuanian territory, but also entered East Prussia, surrounding the city of Memel (Klaipeda). Memel was captured on January 28, 1945. The Memel region was annexed to the Lithuanian SSR (Stalin's gift to Lithuania).

In October 1944, the Gumbinnen-Goldap offensive operation was carried out. The first assault on East Prussia did not lead to victory. The enemy had too strong a defense here. However, the 3rd Belorussian Front advanced 50-100 kilometers and captured over a thousand settlements, preparing a bridgehead for a decisive attack on Königsberg.

The second assault on East Prussia began in January 1945. During the East Prussian strategic operation (it was divided into a number of frontline operations), Soviet troops broke through the German defenses, reached the Baltic Sea and eliminated the main enemy forces, occupying East Prussia and liberating the northern part of Poland. On April 6-9, 1945, during the Königsberg operation, our troops stormed the fortress city of Königsberg, defeating the Königsberg group of the Wehrmacht. On the 25th, the operation was completed by the destruction of the enemy's Zemland group ("Königsberg, wherever you looked, presented a terrible picture").


The Royal Castle in Königsberg, destroyed as a result of the storming of the city. April-May 1945.

Soviet Russia returns part of Prussia


At the Berlin (Potsdam) Conference of the leaders of the three allied powers from July 17 to August 2, 1945, which took place after the end of military operations in Europe, the issue of East Prussia was finally resolved.

On July 23, at the seventh meeting of the heads of government, the issue of transferring the Königsberg region in East Prussia to the Soviet Union was considered. Stalin stated that

President Roosevelt and Mr. Churchill gave their consent to this matter at the Tehran Conference, and this matter was agreed upon between us. We would like this agreement to be confirmed at this conference.

During the exchange of opinions, the delegations of the USA and Great Britain confirmed their consent, given in Tehran, to the transfer of the city of Königsberg and the surrounding area to the USSR.

The protocol of the Potsdam Conference stated:

The Conference considered the proposals of the Soviet Government that, pending the final resolution of territorial issues in a peace settlement, the part of the western border of the USSR adjacent to the Baltic Sea should run from a point on the eastern shore of the Bay of Danzig to the east – north of Braunsberg-Goldan to the junction of the borders of Lithuania, the Polish Republic and East Prussia. The Conference agreed in principle with the proposal of the Soviet Union to transfer to it the city of Königsberg and the region adjacent to it, as described above. However, the exact border is subject to expert study.

In these same documents, in the section “Poland”, the expansion of Polish territory at the expense of Germany was confirmed.

Thus, the Potsdam Conference recognized the need to exclude East Prussia from Germany and transfer its territory to Poland and the USSR. There were no "expert studies" following this due to the change in the international situation, but this does not change the essence of the matter. The Allied powers did not set any time limits ("50 years" etc., as some anti-Soviet historians claim) for which Königsberg and the adjacent region were supposedly transferred to the USSR. The decision was final and indefinite. Königsberg and the adjacent region became Russian forever.

On August 16, 1945, the USSR and Poland signed an agreement on the Soviet-Polish state border. In accordance with this document, the Joint Soviet-Polish Demarcation Commission was formed, and demarcation work began in May 1946. By April 1947, the state border line was demarcated. On April 30, 1947, the corresponding demarcation documents were signed in Warsaw.

On April 7, 1946, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR issued a decree on the formation of the Königsberg Region on the territory of the city of Königsberg and the adjacent district and on its inclusion in the RSFSR. On July 4, after the death of the "all-Union elder" Mikhail Kalinin, Königsberg was renamed Kaliningrad in his honor, and the region was renamed Kaliningrad.

The USSR eliminated a powerful enemy bridgehead in the north-western direction. In turn, Königsberg-Kaliningrad became a Russian military-strategic bridgehead in the Baltic. We strengthened the naval and air capabilities of our armed forces in this direction. This region also had important economic significance.

As Churchill, who was an enemy of Russian civilization, but an intelligent enemy, rightly noted, this was a just act:

The soil of this part of East Prussia is stained with Russian blood, generously shed for the common cause... Therefore, the Russians have a historical and well-founded claim to this German territory.

The inclusion of Königsberg and its adjacent lands into Russia-USSR had not only military-strategic and economic significance, and was Germany's payment for the blood and pain inflicted on the Russian super-ethnos, but also had a profound symbolic and historical significance. The Russian super-ethnos returned part of the Slavic land that had been lost many centuries ago.

Now the masters of Europe have once again set their sights on Russia, preparing the Baltic front with the aim of capturing Kaliningrad. Another "onset to the East".


Stalin, Truman and Churchill at the Berlin Conference. July 1945.
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    1 September 2025 04: 22
    The article is strange. Everything is in a heap. Well, our ancient relatives lived there, so what.

    Example. Let's take Palestine. Who didn't live there, around the 12th century BC the Jews conquered Jerusalem. Then at the beginning of the "new era" (Christians have always suffered from megalomania) they mostly disappeared. Arabs and many others settled there. Now, Jews have settled there again and are exterminating everyone, insisting that it is their land. You guys lived there for only 12 centuries. And people lived there before you and the current ones have lived there for 2 thousand years.

    The same with Königsberg. We Russians are not Jews, so that on the basis that our ancestors once lived there we can conquer and destroy the local population. We needed to secure our borders and Stalin was right to make this region Russia. Now we are doing this with Ukraine.

    Once again, we are not Jews. I am not saying that we are "white and fluffy", we are different from them. And the author is being led by Jewish propaganda. So Berlin is a Slavic city and was founded by them. So we should put Russians in graves while conquering it. If there is such a need, then yes, so that later even more Russians do not fall. But on the basis that there were once Russians there, no.
    1. -1
      1 September 2025 09: 41
      And again the Jews are to blame laughing What Jewish propaganda, what are you talking about, sir? Yes
      1. +2
        1 September 2025 09: 54
        Quote from AdAstra
        And again the Jews are to blame laughing What Jewish propaganda, what are you talking about, sir? yes

        I expected something like that. I had breakfast this morning and watched part of Solovyov's rerun for Sunday. He said there that we need to occupy Berlin, and also take Milan and Lisbon. When they started to weakly object to him, who would feed them. He said that it's not our problem. You are all civilians here, and I am supposedly a soldier and I think with my arms and hands.
        So what do the Jews have to do with it? You impose your opinion on us, and we have our own opinion.
        I wrote about this. laughing laughing laughing
        1. +3
          1 September 2025 10: 17
          So These have already, at least with their wives, children, mistresses, dogs and cats, occupied Berlin and Milan and even Lisbon. Where else could they go? Yes Nooo, whoever I know has nothing to do with it, and stop your "dirty insinuations" laughing
          1. +4
            1 September 2025 16: 37
            Quote from AdAstra
            Nooo, whoever I know has nothing to do with it, and stop with your "dirty insinuations" laughing

            I have an equal attitude towards Jews. And I don't care about their political will, the main thing is that when a knife is thrown at my back, my friend will cover me with his chest.
            Even if he is Jewish, he is still a friend.

            And if not, then they are nobody to me and I have no name for them.
            For us Russians, everything is under control.
        2. +4
          1 September 2025 21: 29
          Listening to Solovyov at breakfast... has your appetite not disappeared? This figure has long been nothing but a gag reflex...
          And the author is right there - everything in the world appeared thanks to the Slavs-Russians, etc.
          We laugh at the Ukrainians for digging up the Black Sea, but we ourselves are doing the same... how is one idiotic propaganda better than another equally idiotic one?
          VO periodically publishes such nonsense that it amazes you...
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            2 September 2025 12: 21
            So this is Samsonov. He is fulfilling his function.
          3. 0
            29 January 2026 19: 13
            And if you listen to Polish politicians and bloggers at breakfast, you'll get an ulcer!
      2. +4
        1 September 2025 20: 15
        Quote from AdAstra
        And again the Jews are to blame laughing What Jewish propaganda, what are you talking about, sir? Yes

        Hello, who is to blame then?
        1. -1
          1 September 2025 20: 36
          Good health to you too Yes Well, these, what are they called, "zh" and "dy" laughing
        2. +1
          2 September 2025 06: 52
          Hello, who is to blame then?

          What questions can there be? Every year in the summer they mock the electorate, they conduct hydraulic tests, we know them, the testers.
    2. +2
      1 September 2025 11: 57
      Palestine, who hasn't lived there? Well, for example, the Chukchi definitely didn't live there... wassat
      1. +2
        1 September 2025 17: 03
        Chukchi, you are not a very proper person, don’t touch him.
        For they are the right people. Strangers to us, but they are the right ones.
        1. +1
          2 September 2025 14: 52
          They may be strangers to you, but they are a bit like relatives to me... laughing
    3. -1
      2 September 2025 08: 40
      Quote: bya965
      We needed to secure our borders and Stalin was right to make this region Russia.

      It’s just not clear why he didn’t make all of East Prussia Russia... Why was it necessary to give these lands to the Poles?
  2. + 10
    1 September 2025 04: 28
    The author may also suggest returning the southern part of Jutland with Northern Germany? Slavs once lived there too. wink
  3. +8
    1 September 2025 04: 33
    "Historical lands" is a very dangerous empty phrase, fraught with unpredictable consequences... Yes, it adds grandeur, super-ethnos and all that, but it also provides rich food for nationalists of all stripes and from all sides.
    1. -3
      2 September 2025 08: 46
      Quote: Alexander_Makedonskov
      "Historical lands" is a very dangerous phrase.

      Well, this phrase doesn't make any sense at all - people have been wandering from place to place throughout history. And in any territory before the local ethnic group lived another ethnic group, and before that another... and so on all the way to the Cro-Magnons...
      1. -1
        2 September 2025 10: 05
        I agree. But it is very convenient to use for political purposes. True, there is not always enough strength smile
    2. 0
      2 September 2025 21: 58
      Quote: Alexander_Makedonskov
      Yes, it adds greatness, super-ethnos and all that, but it also provides rich food for nationalists

      The more land is annexed to Russia, the more migrants from Central Asia will be brought into Russia.
  4. 0
    1 September 2025 05: 11
    The author of the article does not write anything about the fact that after the post-war division of Prussia between the USSR and Poland, Stalin proposed to annex that part of Prussia that went to the USSR, that part of Prussia that had already become the territory of the USSR, to the territory of the Lithuanian SSR. But Snechkus, the then First Secretary of the Communist Party of the Lithuanian SSR, persuaded Stalin not to do this. I will not talk about Snechkus's arguments not to do this. There is no time to write at length. But the fact remains a fact.
    1. +2
      1 September 2025 13: 12
      Klaipeda region is also part of the former East Prussia. Therefore, part of East Prussia became part of the Lithuanian SSR.
  5. +5
    1 September 2025 05: 26
    All this was a long time ago. And today the Russian authorities have given the original Slavic lands to the Abu bandits and Wahhabis from Central Asia. And the Russians have become second-class citizens at home. This is what we need to think about, and not about what once was.
  6. +2
    1 September 2025 05: 45
    Now the masters of Europe have once again set their sights on Russia, preparing the Baltic front with the aim of capturing Kaliningrad.

    When Chancellor Merz says that Russia is going to attack Europe, we twirl our fingers at our temples and pity the "poor" Germans who elected an idiot.
    I wonder, what should we call Mr. Samsonov who wrote the above paragraph?
    1. -1
      1 September 2025 06: 24
      Exactly, it feels like the article was ordered by the European Commissioners.
    2. +1
      1 September 2025 12: 09
      I wonder, what should we call Mr. Samsonov who wrote the above paragraph?

      "Stop! Danger zone: brain work!" (c) Yes
    3. -1
      1 September 2025 21: 34
      Here's 100500 for the thesis!
      There is no end to them, the fighters of the invisible front... all sorts of Solovievs never leave the screen, and the state encourages this crowd... and Samsonov too...
      Provocateurs - that's what they call it
    4. 0
      2 September 2025 02: 01
      Chancellor Merz has already been told that you were not elected by the people, but by the party, so close your window, you talk too much
  7. Des
    +4
    1 September 2025 06: 57
    "The Russians therefore have a historical and well-founded claim to this German territory."
    A great conclusion for VO from "Churchill" in the author's article).
    You can always find pros and cons in any situation.
    The strong (well, that's how it turns out) takes his own.
  8. +3
    1 September 2025 07: 15
    What if the Polovtsians or Pechenegs show up? wassat Should we also give them the southern lands? I'm not even talking about the Genoese or the Sarmatians laughing
    1. -2
      1 September 2025 07: 25
      So already. The second invasion is in full swing.
    2. +2
      1 September 2025 12: 11
      What if the Polovtsians or Pechenegs show up?

      What if they were Khazars? They were even paid tribute. laughing
    3. 0
      1 September 2025 19: 48
      Quote: Antony
      suddenly the Polovtsians or Pechenegs appear

      The main thing is that the Mongols don’t remember that they once reached the Adriatic, and trampled all these Czech/Austrian/Romanian/Hungarian and other lands with the hooves of their horses)
  9. -1
    1 September 2025 07: 41
    Stalin emphasized:

    Russians need ice-free ports of Königsberg and Memel

    And... he gave Memel to Lithuania.

    Britain and the United States have long tried to push the idea of ​​decentralizing Germany, dismemberment it into several state entities, including Prussia (How Stalin saved Germany from dismemberment)
    Who would you have to be to not grab with both hands this most reasonable proposal, which is beneficial specifically to Russia...

    The West turned the southern branch of Russians (Little Russians) into "Ukrainians"
    The author should read the Soviet textbooks "History of Ukraine", where Ukrainian people (no Little Russians!) since the 14,15th century already fights, wages war, develops the Ukrainian language and even participates in the Livonian War
    1. +2
      2 December 2025 18: 02
      Quote: Olgovich
      Stalin emphasized:

      Russians need ice-free ports of Königsberg and Memel

      And... he gave Memel to Lithuania.

      Britain and the United States have long tried to push the idea of ​​decentralizing Germany, dismemberment it into several state entities, including Prussia (How Stalin saved Germany from dismemberment)
      Who would you have to be to not grab with both hands this most reasonable proposal, which is beneficial specifically to Russia...

      The West turned the southern branch of Russians (Little Russians) into "Ukrainians"
      The author should read the Soviet textbooks "History of Ukraine", where Ukrainian people (no Little Russians!) since the 14,15th century already fights, wages war, develops the Ukrainian language and even participates in the Livonian War

      Hello, develops the Ukrainian language.
      No one has ever developed the Ukrainian language.
      The Panamas didn't need this and only literally a little over a hundred years ago they started to develop this swinmov
      Our enemies in WWI started this program and then the Bolsheviks continued it in the spirit of Leninism.
      The violent Ukrainianization of almost the entire territory of Ukraine took place in the twenties and thirties of the last century. Now it is not at all clear why this language was forced upon the Russian population in the Ukrainian SSR.
      1. +1
        3 December 2025 08: 47
        Quote: Ivan Kuzmich
        It's not clear why they started forcing this language on the Russian population in the Ukrainian SSR.

        That was the national policy - to suppress Russians.
  10. +5
    1 September 2025 08: 37
    Quote: Antony
    I'm not even talking about the Genoese or the Sarmatians.
    You've also forgotten about the Neanderthals and the Denisovans. What if they show up too? wink
  11. +7
    1 September 2025 08: 45
    Samsonov got carried away... Maybe he should go back to his desk?
    1. +2
      1 September 2025 12: 13
      Maybe he should go back to school?

      Especially since it's September 1st.
      1. +2
        2 September 2025 10: 26
        Maybe Samsonov should go back to school?

        This "multi-faced" author simply needs to read what his "literary negroes" throw at him before publishing.
        Good afternoon, Andrey! Good afternoon, Alexey!
        1. -1
          2 September 2025 10: 29
          Good afternoon, Andrey! Good afternoon, Alexey!

          Good day Rich! You know, there were "Filipki" in their time, and here on VO, "Samsonovka" laughing
  12. -1
    1 September 2025 10: 42
    Later, the Porussians living on the shores of the Venedian Sea - the Wends is one of the names of the Slavic Rus inhabiting Central Europe (Vandal Rus; German Rus), were recorded as Balts by Western "historians" rewriting history to suit the needs of the Romano-Germanic world.

    That is, according to the opinion of the "historian" Samsonov, for example, the Russian historian Solovyov, rector of the Imperial Moscow University, ordinary academician of the Imperial St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences in the Department of Russian Language and Literature, privy councilor, it turns out that he rewrote history to suit the needs of the Romano-Germanic world.
  13. +5
    1 September 2025 11: 33
    The author of the knowledge is like an ant, the photo of the castle is supposedly destroyed during the assault, but in fact its razors were burned during the bombing in 1944...
  14. +3
    1 September 2025 11: 51
    Pyotr Fyodorovich returned the conquered East Prussia to Prussia

    Perhaps Peter III was not as stupid as is commonly believed... He returned Prussia in exchange for Friedrich's promise to help with the conquest of Holstein. And this is, in fact, control over the Danish Straits, and the future Kiel Canal. Imagine - if all this had belonged to Russia? History could have gone a completely different way...
    1. +1
      3 September 2025 09: 06
      He is a contradictory personality, in my opinion.

      For some reason, our victory in anything is measured exclusively in territories. Well, if we had taken Prussia, would we have been able to hold on to it? What would that have given us in the future?
      Etc. etc.
    2. -1
      4 October 2025 19: 53
      Quote: paul3390
      help with the conquest of Holstein. And this is, in fact, control over the Danish Straits and the future Kiel Canal.

      Of course, he wanted to return Holstein, since it was his land by inheritance, but at that time no one had heard of the Kiel Canal.
      When, almost a decade later, in 1751, the Grand Duke learned that his uncle had finally become the Swedish king, he remarked:

      They dragged me into this damned Russia, where I have to consider myself a state prisoner, whereas if they had left me free, I would now be sitting on the throne of a civilized nation.
  15. +2
    1 September 2025 12: 25
    Quote: Grencer81
    Palestine, who hasn't lived there? Well, for example, the Chukchi definitely didn't live there... wassat

    You are mistaken and the Chukchi lived there. All the inhabitants of Eurasia lived there, through Palestine people went to the north.
  16. -1
    1 September 2025 14: 10
    And Tataria and the Caucasus are not historically Russian lands, for example.
    The local aborigine, always a past invader.
    What has its own written sources is what needs to be written about.
  17. 0
    1 September 2025 15: 11
    The author forgot to mention that the Russians (Etruscans) once populated the Apennine Peninsula laughing
  18. 0
    1 September 2025 15: 58
    I think most likely they started calling the strangers beyond the Neman River Nemtsy, and Rusy - from its tributary and the island Rusne, in Baltic. In German it is still called RUSS.

    The Rus' originated in the region of Belarus and the Baltic coast, and the name Prussia in the region of Kaliningrad came from there. The Germans are those who live on the Neman, and the Prussians are those who live along the Rus'. The Baltic Sea used to be called the Varangian Sea, but the Slavs lived on the southern shore of the Baltic Sea (now it is the north of Germany, Poland, Kaliningrad and the Baltics), and the Scandinavians Svens lived on the northern shore. A little further west there was also the Slavic sacred island of Arkona (now it is the north of Germany), destroyed by the Germanic tribes during the wars to displace the Slavs.

    Rurik is a Varangian, but this is a Slavic Varangian from the southern coast of the Baltic (Varangian) Sea, most likely from the region of Prussia. Firstly, it was Rurik who brought the name Rus, secondly, the Slavs of the Baltic Sea had a Coat of Arms - a diving falcon, which they called - Rorok - which is very reminiscent of the word Rurik and this coat of arms itself is very similar to the Trident - the family Coat of Arms of the Rurikovichs. By the way, this coat of arms is the Coat of Arms of Old Ladoga - the birthplace of Rus as a state. Lomonosov wrote about this.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  19. +2
    2 September 2025 08: 27
    That's right - the southern coast of the Baltic is the Slavs. From there, from Porussia, they invited the Rus to Novgorod, and not from Sweden or anywhere else. Their own, relatives, who had mastered the profession of Varangians (warriors and traders). There is not a single mention of the Slavs communicating with the Rus through an interpreter.
  20. -2
    2 September 2025 13: 37
    One question - why the hell did Stalin suddenly decide to throw away lands in favor of our eternal enemies Poland and Lithuania? It looks stupid and short-sighted.
    1. 0
      2 September 2025 17: 06
      Quote: Totor5
      This looks stupid and short-sighted.

      If you consider that communism is ultimately the withering away of the state, then it is quite farsighted. You should read the same Efremov, he has a vision of the future from the point of view of Marxism. Are there many different countries left in his communist future?
      1. 0
        3 September 2025 15: 52
        So Stalin seemed to be building communism in a single country and moved away from the idea of ​​the World Revolution, for which the Trotskyists attacked him.
        1. 0
          4 September 2025 17: 24
          Quote: Totor5
          So Stalin seemed to be building communism in a single country

          Because he was a realist. And at that moment no world revolution was possible. But to suffer defeat and lose power in the country to the communists because of attempts at a world revolution was quite possible.
          Quote: Totor5
          and moved away from the idea of ​​the World Revolution

          He didn't retreat. He simply focused on building a stable socialist base in the country. So that in the future, under more favorable conditions, the communists could use this base to launch an offensive across the entire planet.
    2. 0
      6 September 2025 14: 21
      "...Oh, you are kind!..." )
    3. -1
      4 October 2025 19: 55
      Quote: Totor5
      One question - why the hell did Stalin suddenly decide to throw away lands in favor of our eternal enemies Poland and Lithuania? It looks stupid and short-sighted.

      At that time, no one foresaw the collapse of the USSR. The socialist countries and national republics were diligently appeasing
      1. +2
        4 October 2025 21: 17
        Well, that's why I'm writing this - why the hell? Although it's obvious why - internationalism at the expense of the Russians.

        This wasn't the only reason for the land distribution; the crimes of Ukrainians and Poles were hushed up, for example. For example, they hushed up how the Poles, after the war, massacred the German and Jewish populations on their territory. And the Czechs, by the way, did the same.
  21. +2
    2 September 2025 19: 54
    There is an inaccuracy in the article: Königsberg (Konigsberg) is translated as the king's mountain (der Berg - mountain).
    Now if the name was Königsburg (Königsburg, die Burg - the castle), then the translation would sound like a royal castle. Well, the shore has nothing to do with it either, except that it sounds similar "berg - shore). Shore in German is das Ufer.
    1. 0
      6 September 2025 14: 19
      The Czech founded the city, so apparently it sounded different somehow.
  22. 0
    6 September 2025 14: 16
    So we should remember the Galician Principality. Or better yet, don't - let the brown rats live there; rats should have their own burrow, they can't come to people.
  23. 0
    2 December 2025 17: 53
    Quote: bya965
    The article is strange. Everything is in a heap. Well, our ancient relatives lived there, so what.

    Example. Let's take Palestine. Who didn't live there, around the 12th century BC the Jews conquered Jerusalem. Then at the beginning of the "new era" (Christians have always suffered from megalomania) they mostly disappeared. Arabs and many others settled there. Now, Jews have settled there again and are exterminating everyone, insisting that it is their land. You guys lived there for only 12 centuries. And people lived there before you and the current ones have lived there for 2 thousand years.

    The same with Königsberg. We Russians are not Jews, so that on the basis that our ancestors once lived there we can conquer and destroy the local population. We needed to secure our borders and Stalin was right to make this region Russia. Now we are doing this with Ukraine.

    Once again, we are not Jews. I am not saying that we are "white and fluffy", we are different from them. And the author is being led by Jewish propaganda. So Berlin is a Slavic city and was founded by them. So we should put Russians in graves while conquering it. If there is such a need, then yes, so that later even more Russians do not fall. But on the basis that there were once Russians there, no.

    Hi, getting your property back is a godly deed and there's nothing wrong with it.
    The Lord gave us these lands and the Lord can return them to us. Amen.
  24. The comment was deleted.