Saab Nimbrix anti-UAV missile

3 844 20
Saab Nimbrix anti-UAV missile
Demonstration of application missiles Nimbrix on quadcopters


The Swedish company Saab AB has developed a new weapon to combat light unmanned aerial vehicles. It is proposed to hit such targets using an ultra-light anti-aircraft missile called Nimbrix. An official presentation of such a product will take place in the near future, and next year the developer company plans to launch serial production and begin deliveries to customers.



On the eve of the premiere


Saab revealed the existence of its new project in late August. It talked about the progress of its development, showed a general view of the promising rocket and named some of its characteristics. However, so far it is only an announcement. The first official display of the Nimbrix product will take place on September 9-12 at the DSEI-2025 exhibition in London.

The Nimbrix surface-to-air missile was developed as a response to the threat of light UAVs for reconnaissance and attack purposes. The fight against such drones has its own characteristics and limitations, which is why specific anti-aircraft weapons are required.

The development of the advanced SAM began in early 2024. Saab took into account all existing factors and formed the initial design of the product. Then individual components and prototypes were manufactured and flight tests were conducted. Based on the testing results, the design was improved. By mid-2025, five such cycles had been conducted and the majority of technical issues had been resolved.

In the near future, the developer company plans to complete the remaining work and determine the final design features. As a result, the final technical appearance of the SAM will appear, and in this form it will be brought to market. Which components still need to be improved is not reported.


Design appearance of the Nimbrix product

The developer company mentions in the official press release that the new missile has already attracted the interest of potential customers. Negotiations are currently underway and the terms of the contracts are being determined. Saab assumes that serial production under these contracts and missile deliveries will begin next year. For obvious reasons, it is not reported who may receive Nimbrix products.

In the near zone


The goal of the Nimbrix project is to develop a surface-to-air guided missile with minimal dimensions and launch weight, capable of intercepting light and small UAVs at ranges of up to several kilometers. The product must be compatible with various launchers and platforms. At the same time, it is planned to achieve a minimum cost, which will allow the deployment and use of SAMs in large quantities.

Saab has revealed the missile's appearance and some of its features. It is likely that such aspects of the project will not change fundamentally in the future, although modifications to certain devices are possible.

The missile is built in a cylindrical body of variable diameter. It has a hemispherical nose fairing and several small external projections of unclear purpose. In the central part of the body, close to the tail, there is an X-shaped trapezoidal wing. Behind it are rudders of similar design. Probably, the planes are made folding.

The total length of the rocket will not exceed 1 m. The diameter of the body and the wingspan are unknown. Judging by the proportions, the diameter of the planes will not exceed 150-200 mm. The launch weight is up to 3 kg.

The product will receive a solid-fuel cruise engine. It is also possible to add a starting engine with a similar fuel charge, which will improve flight characteristics. Depending on the configuration of the propulsion system, the launch range will be between 2 and 5 km. At the same time, the experimental missiles have not yet demonstrated all the calculated characteristics.


Nimbrix will receive a radar homing head, probably semi-active. It is also possible to create other homing heads or radio command guidance, allowing to work against drones.

The missile will receive a high-explosive fragmentation warhead weighing no more than hundreds of grams. Such a device is being developed by Saab, but it is possible to use products from other manufacturers. The expected air targets in the form of light UAVs are not distinguished by their strength or stability, which is why the low weight of the warhead will not be a disadvantage.

The SAM will be used with its own transport and launch container. This is a tubular device suitable for mounting on various launchers.

One stop solution


The Nimbriks missile is being developed as an independent product and is not initially included in any complexes. It is proposed to integrate it into existing or prospective weapons systems in order to improve their combat qualities. Due to this, the new SAM carriers, in theory, can be a wide variety of combat vehicles Defense or other purpose.

Saab's promotional materials feature one of the options for using the new missile. The graphics show a conventional armored vehicle equipped with a Saab Trackfire remotely controlled combat module. Three RBS-70 missile launchers are routinely installed on top of this module. Three containers with small-sized missiles of the new model are placed on the sides of the module. The design of such a module allows the Nimbrix ammunition load to be increased to 12-16 missiles.

TPKs with "Nimbriks" can also be installed on other combat modules, vehicles, etc. The option of using such SAMs on sea carriers is being worked out. Placing them on air platforms is apparently not planned - at least, at the moment it is not mentioned.


Nimbrix missiles on Trackfire module

It is obvious that the issue of the carrier and combat module will be resolved with each customer individually. Probably, Saab is going to use common unified solutions, but it is impossible to exclude the possibility of modifying the missiles or accompanying systems taking into account the customer's requirements.

Response to a threat


Drone aviation in the form of light aircraft has become widespread and has demonstrated its potential in reconnaissance and strikes. A direct consequence of this has been the development of various means of defense and counteraction to drones in order to protect troops.

Another solution to this issue is offered by the Swedish company Saab AB. It is completing the development of a surface-to-air guided missile designed only for intercepting small air targets in the near zone. It is reported that the project is moving forward and is close to completion. Next year, the developer plans to establish serial production of the missiles and begin deliveries to customers.

The developer company has revealed the main features of the new SAM, which allow us to draw the first conclusions. In general, the Nimbrix product in its proposed form looks interesting. The declared characteristics correspond to the expected combat missions. The missile configuration can be changed in accordance with the various requirements and wishes of customers. At the same time, a significantly lower cost is achieved in comparison with other modern SAMs.

The idea of ​​creating a missile outside the anti-aircraft complex is of great interest. Additional means, with the help of which a full-fledged air defense system will be formed, will be selected by the customer in accordance with his requirements and needs.

Thus, the strengths of the Nimbriks project include the simplicity of the design, fairly high characteristics, low cost and the ability to place a large ammunition load on one carrier. In addition, the speed of development and launch of production is important. They want to spend no more than 2-3 years on all these processes.

However, it should be remembered that the new SAM from Saab is still in the development stage. All aspects of the new project have not yet been determined, and the complete appearance of the missile has not been formed. In addition, in its final form, it will have to undergo all the necessary tests and confirm the calculated tactical and technical characteristics.

Saab claims that all necessary work will be completed in the near future. Whether these promises will be fulfilled and the stated deadlines met will become known in the next year and a half.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    3 September 2025 04: 49
    Suspected aerial targets in the form of light UAVs
    How much do such missiles cost? Will it not be like the proverb "shooting sparrows with a cannon"?
    1. IVZ
      +2
      3 September 2025 05: 15
      Wouldn't it be like the saying goes, "shooting sparrows with a cannon"?
      "Sparrows" are dangerous for both much more expensive equipment and personnel.
      1. +3
        3 September 2025 07: 38
        But this is not a reason to make expensive missiles. The SAM should be as cheap as possible, there is no place for AGSN and semi-active homing heads here. Radio command guidance is another matter.
        1. +2
          3 September 2025 10: 56
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          The SAM should be as cheap as possible; there is no place for an AGSN or a semi-active homing head here.

          "I don't shoot with radars.wink
        2. +2
          3 September 2025 11: 20
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          But this is not a reason to make expensive missiles. The SAM should be as cheap as possible, there is no place for AGSN and semi-active homing heads here. Radio command guidance is another matter.
          It is possible that they were able to make an optical seeker based on a mobile phone (not directly from an iPhone, but from civilian components of wide application, like the drones themselves), then
          It may be cheaper than a military radio command system. But I wouldn't refuse a radio command system either, so that I could launch a missile into a reliable search area.
          1. +1
            3 September 2025 11: 32
            I'm not an air defense expert, but I completely agree.
        3. IVZ
          +2
          3 September 2025 16: 16
          there is no place for a semi-active homing head. Radio command guidance is another matter
          Semi-active laser homing head is inexpensive and compact. They are even used in unguided rockets. "Laser trail" is even cheaper, but it seems to me that sooner or later an AGSN based on a lidar that also functions as a laser fuse will be developed. The use of purely optical systems is justified, in my opinion, by the use of UAVs mainly in simple weather conditions.
          1. +1
            3 September 2025 19: 27
            Quote: IVZ
            Semi-active laser seeker

            No, no. Semi-active homing is not a laser, but a radar that operates on a reflected beam.
            A laser may be cheap, but I'm not sure it's applicable.
            However, I repeat, I am not an expert
            1. -1
              4 September 2025 10: 02
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

              A laser may be cheap, but I'm not sure it's applicable.
              However, I repeat, I am not an expert


              Already applicable.
              It has been tested and has impressive results.

              APKWS II
              All types of media.
              From ground-based ones in the form of pickups to special equipment.
              Aviation - helicopters and airplanes.
              Small class boats and ships for now.
              Later they will be installed on all US Navy ships.

              https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=a46a1b8edd07c513&rlz=1C1GCEB_enRU1133RU1133&udm=2&fbs=AIIjpHxhQvS4UcRhemKVjwQRu2gLH_FIcg8cc7Oo-PRggrMKabp004pr5TyBFPwovm-MyL-1dKD0_Jgu1i8KYAlVdwLyezfBm86LqaTa4gS7dY9JWSsmuDgIH58artZHDFbB5ud8jNw7jPvG4pXDC6l1W9f6i4tUBtCfyaFm-xbdZPJr7HHNNHltHl0xPUwV94S88q1BOg_ZxH7X8dPtRsxePOgHqPxQKvNusu-RLQGGpBiycTuN7ph87mW6yNle_mWwQzhP_rJ2nXOAM8vzUJXa0Oe2Bskkmw&q=APKWS+II&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjHqIOjxL6PAxW21QIHHXr0IPMQtKgLegQIGxAB&biw=1920&bih=919&dpr=1
              1. -1
                4 September 2025 10: 09
                Quote: SovAr238A
                Already applicable.
                It has been tested and has impressive results.

                You are now giving data on the air-to-ground missile. Lasers have been used in such munitions for probably 50 years, but probably longer. But here we are talking about the surface-to-air missile, which is something completely different.
                1. 0
                  10 September 2025 09: 44
                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  Quote: SovAr238A
                  Already applicable.
                  It has been tested and has impressive results.

                  You are now giving data on the air-to-ground missile. Lasers have been used in such munitions for probably 50 years, but probably longer. But here we are talking about the surface-to-air missile, which is something completely different.

                  Idem.
                  Modern optical-electronic systems have no difficulty in tracking a low-speed target with a laser.
                  In Ukraine, such air defense systems already exist and work against our drones with very impressive accuracy.
                  1. 0
                    10 September 2025 09: 54
                    I won't argue, I'm not an expert.
        4. 0
          10 October 2025 13: 23
          A SAM shouldn't be made as cheap as possible (this would unjustifiably reduce its effectiveness). The price of a single SAM is completely meaningless.
          The main factor is cost volley A SAM on a single target must not exceed the cost of the target (including an adjustment for the cost of the system's combat alert status). That's all.
      2. 0
        3 September 2025 07: 43
        Against FPV, a portable anti-drone missile system is needed.
  2. 0
    3 September 2025 08: 53
    Yesterday we already discussed this creation of Saaba...
  3. 0
    3 September 2025 13: 18
    To hit at a range of 2 to 5 km and be autonomous, it must be self-guided to a drone, even a small one flying low. How can this be done cheaply? Optical methods are unlikely to work, radar methods too, due to the abundance of interference at low altitude and the complexity of the filling. The only thing left is a seeker for an EMI source. Most likely, they came up with something like that, with a frequency filter that excludes the destruction of its own sources.
  4. 0
    3 September 2025 14: 25
    Against FPV drones, the air defense variant of cheap anti-tank missiles - Malyutka and so on - is quite sufficient.
    The air defense version of the ATGMs should hit much less, be lighter and cheaper.
    As far as can be judged from open information, the standard Malyutka is twice cheaper than FPV drones even without their ammunition. The air defense version of the Malyutka can hit 5 or more times cheaper.
  5. 0
    23 September 2025 12: 03
    It features a hemispherical nose fairing and several small external protrusions of unclear purpose.

    Most likely, these are the nozzles of the steering rocket engines.
  6. 0
    23 September 2025 12: 05
    The design of such a module allows for increasing the Nimbrix's ammunition load to 12-16 missiles.

    In today's reality, this is too little.
  7. 0
    23 September 2025 12: 08
    There's no mention of the missile guidance system. Neither is there any mention of the cost of a single missile. Regarding the reaction speed, judging by the design of the module in the photo, there's no possibility of simultaneous 360-degree fire.