Creators of the new Reality

9 476 89
Creators of the new Reality


BACKGROUND


One of the consequences of the Russian Time of Troubles of 1917-1920, a terrible civilizational and state catastrophe, was the decline of labor, production and technological discipline, the degradation of the working class.



Part of the working class, in order to simply survive, returned from the cities to the village, many people died, fled, became soldiers. In the 1920s, during the NEP, part of the working class was becoming bourgeois.

And in order to carry out industrialization, to create a new socialist society (based on social justice, work ethics and conscience), it was necessary to improve the health of the working class, to essentially create it anew.

It was impossible to create a full-fledged working class or restore labor and production discipline by administrative, coercive methods alone. The Soviet leadership found successful methods – based on socialist competition and the movement of shock workers (Stakhanovites).

When people saw with their own eyes that there is no exploitation of man by man, that honest work is profitable. "Work, activity, creation" - were the main slogans of socialism.

How life is changing for the better right before our eyes thanks to this. Factories and plants, schools and institutes, planetariums and libraries – instead of pubs and brothels.

As Stalin accurately said at the First All-Union Conference of Stakhanovites in Moscow in November 1935:

Life has become better, comrades. Life has become more fun. And when life is fun, work goes well... If we had lived badly, unattractively, joylessly, then we would not have had any Stakhanovite movement. Hence the high production standards. Hence the heroes and heroines of labor. This, above all, is the root of the Stakhanovite movement.

Milestones


The movement was named after the miner of the Central-Irmino mine (Donbass) Alexey Stakhanov, who mined 30 tons of coal in one shift (31 hours 1935 minutes) on the night of August 5-45, 102, with the standard being 7 tons. This was a world record for productivity with a jackhammer, which Stakhanov was helped to achieve by miners Petrov and Mashurov, as well as timber workers Shchegolev and Borisenko.

Nineteen days later, on September 19, Stakhanov broke his own record, producing 19 tons of coal. In the spring of 227, he mined 1936 tons in a shift. The miner became famous throughout the world, and the Stakhanovite movement acquired an all-Union scale and allowed the rate of growth of labor productivity in the USSR to double.

Stakhanov was predicted to have a great future. At that time, such people were valued, and Stakhanov was a young guy who had become famous throughout the country. Joseph Vissarionovich himself did not hide his disposition towards Stakhanov. Perhaps, he could well have become a people's commissar (minister). In 1936, the miner Stakhanov was sent to Moscow to study at the Industrial Academy.

However, Stakhanov, as they say, "went wild" in Moscow. The attention of the entire country, flattering assessments of Stalin and the press turned the head of a simple working guy. Instead of studying at the Industrial Academy, Stakhanov preferred to meet with admirers and began to hit the bottle. Aleksey Grigoryevich did not have a serious career. Under Khrushchev, they tried to forget him as a symbol of the Stalin era. They remembered him only under Brezhnev, and gave him the title of Hero of Socialist Labor.

Nevertheless, Stakhanov's labor feat made a huge contribution not only and not even so much to the development of industry as to the psychology of Soviet people of the Stalin era. His example motivated millions of other Soviet citizens to labor feats, and Stakhanov's name became a household word.

The Stakhanovite movement swept the entire country. For example, among railway workers, the initiator of the Stakhanovite movement was the Donetsk railway driver Pyotr Krivonos, who on July 1, 1935 (two months before Stakhanov's record) drove a coal train at a technical speed exceeding the norm by 9 km/h. His initiative spread to all divisions of railway transport, and collective work methods played a major role in its popularization - the creation of shock and Komsomol-youth brigades.

Soviet newspapers were full of reports of other records. Blacksmith Busygin (city of Gorky) forges 112-127 crankshafts per hour (blacksmiths at the Ford plant forge 100 such shafts per hour). At the wheel turning plant, with a norm of 6 pairs per shift, a Stakhanovite gave 12 pairs, a record that was soon broken: first 15, then 17 and 18. In the Urals, in the copper mines, miner Ivanchikov gave 970% of the norm per shift, that is, he exceeded the average productivity by ten times. He earned 320 rubles that day, an amount almost twice as much as the average monthly salary of a Soviet worker.

In the Krivoy Rog basin, a Stakhanovite miner managed to exceed the norm first by 2300, then by 2500%! Stakhanov's own record was soon broken: miner Gorbatyuk produced 405 tons of coal in a shift, and a few days later miner Borisov produced almost 800 tons, breaking all records and exceeding the norm by 46 times!


Alexey Stakhanov. Photo on the cover of Time weekly, December 16, 1935

Value


The Stakhanovite movement solved two main problems. Firstly, the growth of labor productivity through innovation, rationalization of tools, technologies and processes, invention.

Secondly, through a system of moral and material incentives and rewards for competition participants, work motivation was achieved.

Stakhanovite workers became an integral part of the new society of knowledge, service and creation that was being formed in Stalin's Russia. The main features of the Stakhanovite movement were: involvement in the "common cause", persistence in achieving set goals, courage and competitiveness, thirst for knowledge and the development of personal potential, the desire to improve professional skills, responsibility for oneself and the team.

Under Stalin, they created the so-called "labor aristocracy." When people were shown that honest work is profitable, both from the point of view of moral encouragement of society and materially. No equalization, which was introduced under Khrushchev, undermining people's motivation and labor productivity.

As a result, the Stakhanovite movement became an important part of the development of the highly developed Soviet civilization, an industrial (urban) civilization.


Artist L. Zhdanovskaya. "Stakhanovka's Performance", 1940.
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 21
    31 August 2025 04: 50
    I remember the end of the 1980s - beginning of the 1990s, when all the liberals who had crawled out of damp and moldy basements and garbage buckets, not finished off by Comrade Stalin, began to vilify Stakhanov! And those who vilified him were those who had never held anything heavier than a spoon or a pen in their hands.
    1. +8
      31 August 2025 06: 08
      Then the campaign to "expose" our past was in full swing, naturally Stakhanov got in too. But with his mind and work he set a world record in his specialty. Well then all the yum went to Kosmedevyanskaya, and Pavlik Morozov, and Ostrovsky. It's easier to write that they didn't slander.
      But Stakhanov went on a labor feat after Stalin's words that it was necessary to catch up with the West within 10 years. And he was not alone. Even Hitler, unlike the underdeveloped, would say:
      "And it would be stupid to ridicule the Stakhanovite movement," Hitler will say. "The arming of the Red Army is the best proof that with the help of this movement it was possible to achieve unusually great successes in the matter of educating Russian workers with their special mindset and soul."
    2. +8
      31 August 2025 06: 16
      The Stakhanovite movement and popular upsurge of those years is a unique phenomenon! Unfortunately, in modern society, even without a common idea, such a charge cannot be launched…
      1. -16
        31 August 2025 11: 12
        Quote: lubesky
        The Stakhanovite movement and the popular upsurge of those years was a unique phenomenon!

        In 1935 the country was still a peasant country. Tell us about the popular upsurge in agriculture.
        1. 0
          31 August 2025 11: 17
          Quote: Olgovich
          In 1935 the country was still a peasant country. Tell us about the popular upsurge in agriculture


          Where did I claim otherwise? Point it out. The rural population was predominant, not only in 35, but also during the war. I wrote about the Stakhanovite movement, not about collective and state farms.
          So you will take the trouble to find the information YOU need. hi
          1. -2
            1 September 2025 07: 55
            You wrote about the people's upsurge - now prove it - in the farm.
          2. 0
            13 October 2025 21: 54
            Well, no longer. In 1935, tens of millions of people were working in construction and industry. It wasn't a peasant workforce anymore. If they had been peasants, they wouldn't have been able to create the country's industrial defense shield by 1940. The peasants wouldn't have been able to mass-produce the Yak-1, T-34, or PPSh. And it wasn't their job anyway...
        2. +5
          31 August 2025 21: 00
          Olgovich, stop performing your highly artistic whistle. It's annoying.
        3. +1
          1 September 2025 00: 52
          You definitely need to throw some shit at the fan, what a bilious man you are.
      2. -2
        31 August 2025 19: 16
        What not to launch - fully computerize and automate production, which will work 24 hours a day, without the human factor (illness, heating, lighting, drinking, absenteeism, sabotage, sabotage, dismissals, etc., etc.)
    3. 0
      9 September 2025 14: 42
      Not everything was going smoothly with the Stakhanovite movement.
      as usual in those days the factor of the performers on the ground had a very strong influence and off we went -
      padding, lies, artificial inflation, defects, etc. Anything to somehow rise. The negative consequences of this race began to grow at such a rate that Stalin grabbed his head a year later and thought about how to stop this process. So historians are now arguing about how to evaluate this phenomenon, as a plus or a minus. By the way, one of the negative consequences of the Stakhanovite movement was "rationalization" to increase production volumes, which, without approval, changed products so much that they became useless. As one of the results - the army in 41 found itself with shells for a 45 mm cannon that split on the armor. And only during the BD it turned out that this was the work of another awarded "rationalizer".
      And questions arose about Stakhanov himself, since in essence the result of the group’s work, recorded for 1 person, was being assessed.
      So, quite a few flies in the ointment were quickly added to the Stakhanovite movement, which were then exploited in the 90s.
  2. + 10
    31 August 2025 05: 35
    I had to participate in the development of draft plans for the 1981th Five-Year Plan (1985-100) for one of the branches of the national economy in one of the union republics. And suddenly from Moscow from the union ministry they send a list of resources that we must include in our draft plan. And on this list are 2 pneumatic jackhammers, which we basically did not need in any quantity. I call my Main Directorate in Moscow and try to refuse. In response, they tell me a story that would have made Shakespeare die of envy. It turns out that after Stakhanov's record, which he set using similar pneumatic jackhammers, the USSR Ministry of Coal Industry decided to order 300000 such hammers for each miner, about 80 pieces in total. The order was accepted and made. But by this time, coal harvesters and chippers had begun to be mass-produced; such quantities were simply no longer needed and they were sent to warehouses where their remains lay until the early 20s of the XNUMXth century and were forcibly distributed throughout the country.
    This is the squiggle, you see.
    1. +1
      31 August 2025 06: 11
      There are tons of such and opposite examples. When what is needed rusts, and what is not needed is implemented. And how much QC and GOST did harm in places. But still they moved forward.
    2. +2
      31 August 2025 06: 20
      Quote: Amateur
      The USSR Ministry of Coal Industry decided to order two such hammers for each miner, a total of approximately 2 pieces.


      I wonder where these barriers are now? Or who stole this socialist property and where it went under EBN...
      1. 0
        24 September 2025 22: 31
        Quote: lubesky
        I wonder where these barriers are now? Or who stole this socialist property and where it went under EBN...
        What does EBN have to do with this in this particular case - if everything is in the post?
        Quote: Amateur
        they were sent to warehouses where their remains were lay there until early 80s 20th century and were forcibly distributed throughout the country..
    3. + 15
      31 August 2025 07: 04
      pneumatic jackhammers are needed for repairing roads, buildings, that is, they are needed in many places. It is unlikely that they were stored in oblivion.
    4. +2
      31 August 2025 20: 29
      Well, hammers could have been taken for "if anything, to remove asphalt", or something like that.
      What's the problem? They could come in handy.
      It is clear that there is little use and it will only be useful in the future, but you can understand them, they have forgotten about the wow effect, they need to put it somewhere. laughing
    5. 0
      13 October 2025 21: 59
      That's right. The planned economy had its advantages in some ways, like building the atomic shield or the space race. But at the same time, I remember my Soviet-era shoes with sadness. Sure, they cost 10 rubles a pair, but looking at them (and wearing them) was unbearable. As soon as I arrived in Bulgaria in 1984, I immediately bought myself sandals and boots, and a leather bag too. They had socialism there too, but not as blunt as ours.
  3. + 13
    31 August 2025 05: 51
    The direction was right. The degeneration of the party nomeklatura led the country to collapse. China did not turn away from this path and look where it is and where we are.
    1. + 11
      31 August 2025 06: 03
      Quote: lexander_makedonskov
      The degeneration of the party nomeklatura led the country to collapse
      In China, this degeneration process also took place, and it is probably still happening. It's just that the country is run by the so-called "non-degenerations". But it could have turned out the other way around, if Tiananmen Square had suddenly won.
      1. +4
        31 August 2025 06: 14
        By the way, a coup is brewing in China, but it seems like they are copying it. IMHO
      2. -4
        31 August 2025 06: 34
        Quote: Dutchman Michel
        But it could have turned out the other way around if Tiananmen Square had suddenly won.

        The Chinese rulers had will and balls of iron, the CPC did not become perverted and did not deviate from the party line, unlike the Union. Exactly 10 years of the "Khrushchev camarilla" led to the collapse of the country 27 years later, the liberals won and have not been defeated to this day, let's remember the "Navalnyatina", which almost led to another collapse.
        1. 0
          31 August 2025 08: 17
          The CPC has not become corrupted or deviated from the party line, unlike the Union.

          The Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution were precisely conceived and implemented by the CCP.

          On the topic, Article by Alexander Samsonov caramel - patato,
          check out the article from 31.08.2025 ""A mine is hard labor, you'll kill your strength in vain, you'll disappear..." 90 years since the Stakhanovite record. What was the life of the legendary miner like?"
          https://lenta.ru/articles/2025/08/31/stakhanov/
        2. 0
          31 August 2025 13: 47
          After the suppression of these unrests, the implementation of market reforms accelerated sharply, and the role of the private sector in the economy increased sharply.
          1. -1
            31 August 2025 17: 43
            Quote: Sergej1972
            the role of the private sector in the economy has increased sharply.

            Is this necessary for the country?
            1. 0
              31 August 2025 19: 17
              Well, the Chinese evaluate this positively. They know better.
            2. 0
              24 September 2025 22: 40
              Quote: carpenter
              The CPC has not become corrupted or deviated from the party line, unlike the Union.
              and raised a bunch of dollar billionaires, 92% of private industry and 80% of the private banking sector - did the Union need to raise billionaires?!
      3. +2
        31 August 2025 13: 46
        Some of the protesters in this square were speaking out against excessive stratification, for greater social justice, for a return to Mao's ideas. Don't think that only liberals and market supporters were rebelling there.
        1. +3
          31 August 2025 13: 59
          for greater social justice, for a return to Mao's ideas.
          And all this for American money?
          1. +2
            31 August 2025 15: 57
            For some of the protesters, democratization and political reform were more important, for others, social justice and limiting property inequality. But these are well-known facts. The majority were not at all against socialism.
        2. +1
          31 August 2025 15: 24
          for a return to Mao's ideas
          There were mainly students there. Students for Mao's ideas? wink
          1. +1
            31 August 2025 15: 55
            Yes, many students were unhappy with the growing social stratification.
          2. +2
            31 August 2025 16: 14
            In the PRC, part of the population is still nostalgic for the times of Mao, including people who did not live at that time. Moreover, some even sympathize with the period of the "Cultural Revolution" of 1966-1976. We have young people who idealize life in the USSR. What's surprising about that? Do you think that all students in all countries are supporters of liberalism and the market? A significant part of students (and not only students) in the PRC at that time spoke out against the capitalist direction of Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms and for the preservation of Mao's socialist gains. Not all people, either in China or here, like to work for a private owner. But at the same time, many protesters simultaneously spoke out for political democratization. Many people thought that in the case of democratization, it would be possible to nominate representatives to government bodies who could achieve a smoother course of reforms, could contribute to the reduction of social differentiation in society, etc. That is, this movement was contradictory. Some were pro-Western, while others advocated a return to "real" socialism. The Chinese authorities dispersed both pro-Western and liberal elements, as well as opponents of market reforms who advocated "real" socialism. Incidentally, Russian university professors working with Chinese students have often witnessed heated squabbles between them when discussing events in China's recent history, Mao's personality, etc.
    2. -6
      31 August 2025 10: 05
      China is where it is because of its cheap labor and disregard for the environment.
  4. +9
    31 August 2025 06: 19
    Now there are countless anti-Soviet films, which have one task - to show the inhumanity of the Soviet system. The lies take on unimaginable forms. Then there is the arrest at a New Year's party, where a large company has gathered. And all this moves from 1937 all the way to the Brezhnev period. We lived at that time. And we saw perfectly well what was happening around us. The omnivorousness of our audience helps such films. If only it were more interesting, if only it were sharper.
    1. + 16
      31 August 2025 08: 22
      You know, before the SVO, I also thought that "enemies of the people" were all fairy tales. But then the SVO began and I realized that Stalin was right in many ways. How many of these pro-Ukrainian people are sitting in their "lucrative" positions. The bureaucrats, it seems, are all for Russia's victory, but they put spokes in the wheels, delay decisions on necessary issues, "coordinate" them, etc. Take how many questions arise at customs. They are carrying humanitarian aid - this is not allowed, that is not allowed. Shotguns are not allowed, for fighting drones. This is both funny and sinful, a person has a machine gun for LBS, but for a shotgun, let's get a permit. And how many Caucasians are selling humanitarian aid. I already wrote: now I knit camouflage nets. Mostly women aged 40-70 knit. And in the institution where we knit, one "patriot" from the workers closed the toilet for us. And now we have to go to the other wing. It seems funny, but before, we used to knit three nets per shift, and now we knit two. And how much does it come out to per month? That's the thing! And try telling that "patriot", she saw a filthy toilet. If it were up to me, I wouldn't be able to resist either, I would carry out a "cleansing" of such "comrades".
      1. +4
        31 August 2025 08: 45
        Quote: fiberboard
        How many of these pro-Ukrainian people are sitting in "lucrative" positions? The bureaucrats, it seems, are all for Russia's victory, but they put spokes in the wheels, delay decisions on necessary issues, "coordinate" them, etc.

        and did they start doing this with the start of the SVO? if not, then what does pro-Ukrainianism have to do with it, if this is their norm of life?
  5. + 10
    31 August 2025 06: 36
    Socialist revolution + civil war = Time of Troubles? Is this another anti-Soviet narrative? In fact, "time of troubles" is discord in the ruling elite of the state, which is expressed in general armed confrontation. During a revolution, there is no discord at the top, but there is a complete change of the social and economic system. And the armed confrontation during the Time of Troubles is not at all like the Civil War. In the first case, "the lords fight, and the serfs' forelocks crack", and in the second, the overthrown classes try to strangle the new system by force. So it is simply unlawful to equate the struggle for the throne with the struggle to build a new society.
  6. + 11
    31 August 2025 06: 42
    The Stakhanovite movement also had a negative impact, which Stalin pointed out by the way - the country was literally overwhelmed by record mania, the Turkmen began to organize record-breaking camel races, the future Marshal Zhukov on horses, also races, and so on. A real bacchanalia began, and this caused Stalin's concern, the issue was even brought up at the Politburo
    1. +7
      31 August 2025 08: 35
      Quote: bober1982
      caused Stalin's concern, the issue was even brought up at the Politburo

      And the Stakhanovites began to... simply be beaten by their own comrades. Because after that their production standards were raised. At our Penza plant named after Frunze there was such a... Stakhanovite. He received a new machine and fulfilled the five-year plan for 3 years. And he continued to sharpen "part #70", that is, to materialize resources that could have been used differently. The workers laughed at him, but they didn't beat him anymore in the XNUMXs.
      1. +5
        31 August 2025 13: 10
        Quote: kalibr
        And the Stakhanovites also began to... simply be beaten by their own comrades. Because after that their production quotas were increased.

        So this is the meaning of both the record and propaganda. In increasing the standards. The standard of 7 tons for manual work is calculated with a pick. A new tool appeared - a jackhammer, it allowed to extract much more, but also required a different organization of work and a different approach. Including forms of payment, today the extracted coal is also counted not for one combine operator, but for the entire shift that services and accompanies him.
        1. +3
          31 August 2025 16: 02
          Quote: Saxahorse
          accompanies.

          Yes, you are right. Progress goes in such ways too. But, alas, for some reason it never goes without excesses. This is what I personally always regret.
          1. 0
            31 August 2025 21: 46
            Quote: kalibr
            But, alas, for some reason, nothing goes without excesses.

            That's right. A stupid boss will easily raise the standards by 15 times purely based on the results of newspaper propaganda. Without even thinking whether any organizational changes are needed here. Then such a boss is guaranteed a major and unpleasant conflict with his employees.
        2. +4
          1 September 2025 02: 25
          Quote: Saxahorse
          Quote: kalibr
          And the Stakhanovites also began to... simply be beaten by their own comrades. Because after that their production quotas were increased.

          So this is the meaning of both the record and propaganda. In increasing the standards. The standard of 7 tons for manual work is calculated with a pick. A new tool appeared - a jackhammer, it allowed to extract much more, but also required a different organization of work and a different approach. Including forms of payment, today the extracted coal is also counted not for one combine operator, but for the entire shift that services and accompanies him.

          The "7 ton" standard is designed for ONE miner...
          Stakhanov was the first to introduce the team method of coal mining; together with Stakhanov, they set records in the coalface timber workers G. Shchigolev and T. Borisenko - Stakhanov only chopped coal, and after him Shchigolev and Borisenko reinforced the ceiling of the shaft. Before Sakhanov, one miner chopped coal and reinforced the shaft.
          About records... a few days later M.D. Dyukanov issued for the shift (according to Stakhanov's method) 114 tons, was also awarded the Order of Lenin and the Red Banner of Labor, but did not receive glory...
          hi
      2. -1
        1 September 2025 09: 36
        Well, I don’t think you were overworked in those days, right? Yes
  7. +4
    31 August 2025 06: 54
    Stakhanov commands respect, he is a person from another reality, the title of the article, by the way, is very correct, it was these people who restrained Hitler
  8. + 17
    31 August 2025 07: 02
    Happy Miner's Day! My first education is in mining, so I know and understand Stakhanov's labor feat thoroughly, I will try to explain. In our mines, for a long time in the last century, and even now, pneumatic tools are used. In Stakhanov's time, it was a pneumatic jackhammer, the main problems are the pressure drop in the system due to the length of the pneumatic lines, a large number of consumers and freezing of the valves in the hammer's distribution box, air leaks from the line. Therefore, during the work on the record, no one worked on the horizon. In those days, the miner in the longwall, as the face moved forward, had to strengthen the arch with posts and rake away the broken coal, and this was a very labor- and time-consuming job, so Stakhanov's work was supported by two more miners, they were engaged in shoring and delivering broken coal to the loading site in wagons by horse traction. Throwing a hundred tons with a large shovel with a short handle is not a piece of cake. It was after Stakhanov's first record that they began to think about a comprehensive division of responsibilities in coal mining.
  9. +6
    31 August 2025 08: 52
    Today is MINER'S DAY! And first of all, Happy Holidays to all involved!
    I come from one of the cities of the Kizelovsky Coal Basin, two grandfathers worked in the mine all their lives, the beloved of them went from a miner to a site manager. After the army, my father worked in the mine for 8 years, and then the mine was closed.
    So for us this holiday has always been valued more than New Year!
    "And it would be stupid to ridicule the Stakhanovite movement," Hitler will say. "The arming of the Red Army is the best proof that with the help of this movement it was possible to achieve unusually great successes in the matter of educating Russian workers with their special mindset and soul."

    There is a story about the defense of Odessa, where Donbass miners distinguished themselves, after which the German troops allegedly issued an order "Do not take miners prisoner." The story that this order was issued is murky and is disputed by many, but knowing the character of THOSE miners, I personally believe in this order))

    By the way, our Ural miners also treated Stakhanov's labor feat with... clarifications)), i.e. no one threw dirt at him, they recognized that he was a noble miner, but they also did not forget to clarify certain nuances.
  10. + 10
    31 August 2025 08: 58
    at the copper mines, miner Ivanchikov produced 970% of the norm in a shift, that is, exceeded the average productivity by ten times

    With all due respect to the working man, such figures are puzzling.
    When we are talking about, say, a five-year plan in four years - there are no questions. Yes, it is difficult, very difficult - but in figures, it is 25% of the total productivity, if we are talking about the same miners
    But - 970? We all work or worked somewhere. Just imagine your workload, and then multiply it by 10
    It's one of two things - either it's impossible, or the initial standards are deliberately understated.
    There will probably be a lot of downvotes now)
    No problem, briefly describe your place of work, and give your ideas on how you can improve your productivity by 10 times. And, preferably, without the involvement of fantastic technology that will do all this for you
    1. -2
      31 August 2025 09: 16
      Quote from sdivt
      It's one of two things - either it's impossible, or the initial standards are deliberately understated.

      Or third:

      On the night of August 30-31, 1935, during the shift Stakhanov with two timber workers mined 102 tons of coal, with the standard per miner being 7 tons, exceeding this standard by 14 times and setting a record. All the coal was registered to the miner., although he did not work alone. However, even taking into account all the workers of the shift, the success was significant. The reason for the success was the new division of labor. Until that day, several people worked at the face at the same time, cutting out coal with jackhammers, and then, to avoid a collapse, strengthening the roof of the mine with logs
    2. +5
      31 August 2025 09: 21
      The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

      Quote from sdivt
      Just imagine your workload and then multiply it by 10

      Introduced.

      I'm sitting playing in the sandbox, using a children's shovel to fill a hill. Then I arrived with an excavator and with one movement filled a mountain of sand from the entire sandbox... How many times did my volume of work increase?

      Chopping coal with a pick and shovel is not the same as doing it mechanically. Labor productivity increases.

      In the same way, today the introduction of robotics in production will increase labor productivity several times. It will free up labor resources and, as a result, reduce the retirement age.
      1. +4
        31 August 2025 11: 51
        Quote: Boris55
        I'm sitting playing in the sandbox, using a children's shovel to fill a hill. Then I arrived with an excavator and with one movement filled a mountain of sand from the entire sandbox... How many times did my volume of work increase?

        I'll tell you a little bit about my work biography, it fits your option very well.
        In the early 80s, I worked at a plant, repairing and servicing CNC machines, and running a laboratory for repairing electronic parts. The machine park was large, of all directions, there were practically no divisions in work, we did everything. In the workshop, in addition to CNC machines, there was a fair amount of conventional machines. The range of parts produced on conventional machines never overlapped with those made on CNC machines. I'll tell you why later.
        That's the introduction, now to the point)
        On CNC machines, the production standards are completely different, after all, automation is a considerable help. And very often workers came to us with a "tiny" request - guys, can you punch a punched tape for this part? Well, it's not difficult for us, we have everything for this in the laboratory
        This guy, using the program, will stand on a free CNC machine and, roughly speaking, will work out two of his daily norms during his lunch break, which he would do on his machine. It would seem that everything is simple... But no.
        Sooner or later (usually early, very early, already at the closing of the timesheet) the foreman begins to ask himself the question: dude, how were you able to issue, at the end of the month, one and a half norms, when the whole team, working right there, barely does one?
        And it’s good if the comrade repents, and everything will end with the master.
        Because if the case develops (and this has happened, and more than once), the technologist gets involved, the rate-setters come, they can even take a so-called photo of the working day (this is when they stand over your soul, with a stopwatch, your whole day, and record it down to the minute - turned on the machine - 9:02:10, fixed the part - 9:03:15, started processing 9:03:45, and so on, right down to "went to the toilet, came back, wiped his hands with a rag." There are two options here, either it is obvious that the comrade somewhere, "fell in love with" someone, because he could not produce what was written in the timesheet, or, if he decided to die, but do what he did with the CNC - the standards can be reviewed and increased.
        In the first case, this comrade will be left without a bonus for the previous flight, and in the second... in the second, the entire team will be very, very "grateful" to him for the increased norm, but at the same rates)
        I wrote it in an exaggerated way, of course, but I hope I fully conveyed the essence.
        This is where all my skepticism about such cases comes from.
      2. +3
        31 August 2025 18: 00
        Well, this is the first time Boris has said something sensible.
      3. 0
        1 September 2025 20: 53
        It will free up labor resources and, as a result, reduce the retirement age.

        I don't see the connection. I see it with unemployment and the percentage of defects...
        Let's take (simplified, everything is simplified further) an oiler, whose job is to add liquid to machines, right, with CNC. He has 10 machines, in each of which the part "cooks" for several hours. But he's itching, he's a Stakhanovite! And he takes 28 machines, so what! He manages to do everything... He manages to do it for a day, a second, a week. And then he doesn't manage to...
        1. The machine protection was triggered and the part was rejected (materials and machine hours).
        2. The protection didn't work (and the adjuster there is also a Stakhanovite!), - the machine falls into heavy repair... And he is left with 27 machines. "Well, they are interfering with my work! I am going for a record!" 26, 25, 24...
    3. -5
      31 August 2025 10: 58
      Quote from sdivt
      It's one of two things - either it's impossible

      Of course, it’s impossible: about 2/3 of the time he was supposed to be fastening, but he only chopped, and when the fasteners assigned to him didn’t have time, he chopped further, violating all safety standards.
      1. +2
        31 August 2025 13: 02
        Quote: Olgovich
        of course, it is impossible: about 2/3 of the time he was supposed to be fastening, but he only chopped, and when the fasteners assigned to him did not have time, he chopped further

        Well, the new equipment required a different organization of work. It's all logical.
        1. -1
          31 August 2025 13: 12
          Quote: Saxahorse
          Well, new equipment and a different organization of work required

          not only did two timber workers help Stakhanov (shouldn't they have been assigned some of the coal?), but also all nextI was on duty reinforcing HIS production so that the roof wouldn't collapse and nothing would be mined. Shouldn't Stakhanov's coal have been distributed to it?
          1. +1
            31 August 2025 13: 16
            Quote: Olgovich
            but the entire next shift reinforced ITS production so that the roof wouldn't collapse and nothing would be mined. Shouldn't Stakhanov's coal have been distributed to it?

            So this is not a question for Stakhanov but for the organization of the wage system. Today, only one combine operator directly chops coal. But a whole team accompanies his work.
    4. +1
      31 August 2025 16: 12
      Quote from sdivt
      No problem, briefly describe your place of work, and give your ideas on how you can improve your productivity by 10 times. And, preferably, without the involvement of fantastic technology that will do all this for you

      Work of a university teacher. In Soviet times, the workload of an associate professor was 550 hours. But... we had 16 groups of young assistants per week, that is, really more. Now the workload is 750 hours, but in a number of specialties there is only part-time work - no children. And someone has one and a half hours and a very decent salary. But... all students need to send their daily grades to an electronic diary. Over the 5 years that you are selected by competition, you must write 25 scientific articles, 5 of which are with the Higher Attestation Commission stamp. Preferably 2-3 in a foreign language abroad. Also a textbook or methodology or a chapter in a textbook. It is desirable to write and publish a monograph. Receive at least 1 grant from the Russian Academy of Sciences. In this case, there will be a high rating and a high salary supplement. Question: when to write all this? In 2017, when I retired, I had 40 articles according to my report, 3 abroad, 1 in the VAK collection, 3 textbooks published in Moscow, 2 monographs and 1 grant. And all this only because I worked at the limit, and my wife (retired) was standing behind me with a sandwich with red caviar. And there were also articles published on VO, Pravda.ru, Repin, Russian Cross, Popular Mechanics. I could not work like that anymore...
    5. +2
      31 August 2025 19: 28
      For example, a small window manufacturing company - 8-10 workers - 30-40 windows per shift.
      An automated line from some German company (like Urban) - 300 windows per shift - 3-4 operators, plus 6 assemblers-loaders (installation of double-glazed windows).
      Shall we count productivity?
      There is a line for 500-600 items per shift, there is a fully automated one (only low-skilled loaders are needed)
      1. -2
        31 August 2025 19: 40
        Quote: Billi Bons1972
        small window manufacturing company - 8-10 workers - 30-40 windows per shift.
        Automated line , some German company (like Urban) - 300 windows per shift - 3-4 operators, plus 6 people assemblers-loaders (installation of double-glazed windows)

        I thought I made myself abundantly clear:
        Quote from sdivt
        Describe your place of work and give your ideas on how you can improve your productivity by 10 times. And, preferably, without involvement fantastic technology that will do all this for you


        In plain language - without buying all these "German lines" (C), excavators, a company of hired workers, etc., but exactly on the same terms on which you do your work.
        Because there is a concept of standard hours (or the very plan that is discussed in the article)
        If you assemble these windows (since you mentioned windows), if you assemble the windows manually - these are one standard hours
        If you start using mechanization (in your case, German lines), completely different standard hours will be applied to you.
        1. -1
          31 August 2025 22: 00
          I gave an example of how labor productivity increases with the help of automation and mechanization of production.
          And so of course, if a worker did some kind of operation, well, let it increase by 20 percent due to the sweatshop system, but it’s not many times over, that’s for sure.
    6. 0
      1 September 2025 20: 41
      Give your ideas on how you can improve your productivity by 10 times.

      Printing. Without stopping the machine to adjust the forms. No paint, no paper. A pile of rejects in the corner. The number of copies is taken from the machine counter.
      Printing, photography. Originals with similar initial characteristics (for example, engravings with French strokes) are fixed in the original holder. If you work with a large field, you can fit a whole deck (30 - 50 originals), and do everything in one cycle.
  11. +2
    31 August 2025 09: 05
    Factories and plants, schools and institutes, planetariums and libraries – instead of pubs and brothels.

    That is, the Time of Troubles was aimed not at the destruction of statehood, but against taverns and brothels.
    And to carry out industrialization, to create a new socialist society (based on social justice, work ethics and conscience)
    so this is not the Time of Troubles, but a revolution. laughing
  12. +2
    31 August 2025 09: 05
    Happy holiday, miners! A dangerous and very necessary profession! All the best to you!
  13. +2
    31 August 2025 09: 19
    The pneumatic jackhammer "OMS-5" belonged to the miner A.G. Stakhanov, an innovator of the coal industry, the founder of the Stakhanovite movement. USSR, 1936.
    1. +3
      31 August 2025 09: 21
      JACK HAMMERS, portable, lightweight and kinematically simple tool designed for the extraction of coal and other strata deposits. Jackhammers
      provide an increase in labor productivity by 80-100%, and in the hands of Stakhanovite miners - even more.
      Having appeared in the 20th century, pneumatic M. o. quickly gained wide application in the extraction of soft and medium-hard coals from inclined and steeply falling seams. In 1933, 64.100 M. o. were operating in Germany (Ruhr), 23.000 in Belgium, 19.719 in France, 12.335 in England, and about 1 were in operation in the USSR as of 1937/VII 13.000.
      Hammers of the Pneumatica plant work quite satisfactorily in a wide variety of conditions, enabling the leading Stakhanovite workers to extract in 1935 from 102 tons per shift (A. Stakhanov at the Central-Irmino mine) to 660 tons (Nikitin in 1935, Izotov and Stepanenko in 1936) in the Donbass and up to 778 tons (I. Borisov at the end of 1935 at Anzherka) and even up to 1.466 tons (R. Machekhin at the end of 1935 in Prokopyevsk) in the mines of Siberia. Despite the great simplicity of practical mastering of the M. o., its cheapness and a significant increase in the productivity of the miner, it is impossible to consider it advisable to focus on the widespread introduction of pneumatic chipping hammers for coal mining. The reason for this is the high cost of compressed air and the difficulty of its drainage with the significant development of work in a large modern mine.
      1. +2
        31 August 2025 09: 32
        “The opportunity to set new records and raise standards has arisen thanks to the introduction of new technologies.
      2. +3
        31 August 2025 13: 47
        A jackhammer is a good thing, of course, and it increases a lot of things. But after using it, your hands shake so much that it's scary for your joints.
  14. +4
    31 August 2025 10: 14
    What is truly worth something, what is genuine, real, is valued all over the world, even in the world of "cash". That is why Alexey Stakhanov is on the cover of TIME magazine.
    And this despite the fact that no movement like Stakhanovite could be organized on the personal initiative of a worker. So what does this say? About the wisdom of the state of that time, about its high professionalism. Inspire, but do not forbid!
    Thank you very much for the article, Alexander!
    Let it become a reproach to our current state.
  15. -4
    31 August 2025 10: 48
    Exactly 90 years ago this event happened and this is what it was like:
    On August 31, 1935, Stakhanov, Shchigolev and Borisenko rose to the surface of the mine at six o'clock in the morning. That night, Stakhanov "drove" an 85-meter longwall, cutting 102 tons of coal and fulfilling 14,5 norms. The miners who emerged from the cage were deafened by the orchestra. In the overcrowded room, the smartly dressed party organizer Konstantin Petrov read out a special resolution of the plenary session of the mine party committee:

    “First. To put Comrade Stakhanov’s name on the honor board of the best people of the mine. Second. To give him a bonus in the amount of a month’s salary. Third. To provide Comrade Stakhanov with an apartment from the housing stock of engineering and technical personnel, installing a telephone in it. To assign a riding horse for Stakhanov’s personal use. Fourth. To equip the apartment with everything necessary and upholstered furniture at the expense of the mine. Fifth. To allocate a family trip to a resort. Sixth. Starting from September 1, to allocate two personal places in the club for Stakhanov and his wife with free admission to all film screenings and performances. Seventh. On September 10, to hold an evening in Stakhanov’s new apartment, inviting to it distinguished people of the mine and jackhammer masters of the entire Donbass – Comrades Grishin, Sviridov, Murashko, Izotov. The expenses of the evening are to be borne by the mine.”

    The record was prepared - several more people worked on the stakhpnov.
    Wherein:

    Hero of Socialist Labor Pyotr Sinyagovsky worked with Stakhanov in the same area and were friends.:.

    "August 31, 1935 was Sunday, but I still decided to go out on the first shift: the mine had not fulfilled the plan, work on holidays and weekends was encouraged. I came as always, early. The site manager Nikolai Mashurov did not give me a chance to say: "Listen carefully. Do everything quickly. That night I allowed Stakhanov to cut three benches using the new method. I gave him two timberers. And he "drove" the entire lava. More than half of the face is not secured and can collapse at any moment. Go down immediately and start securing, I will direct everyone who comes to you. The timber for securing is already under the lava. Hurry up." We spent the entire first shift securing the lava" During the record Stakhanov he was cutting unsecured rock and violated safety regulations in doing so
    .
    the whole shift after Stakhanov... They did NOT chop coal, but only reinforced its passage. How much coal was not mined because of Stakhanov?

    . The same here:
    Blacksmith Busygin (Gorky) forges 112 crankshafts per shift (Ford plant blacksmiths forge 100 of the same shafts).
    BUT - Busygin rested for two days after the record..., and the Ford guy continued to change 100 shafts....

    A Stakhanovite miner earned more than 1600 rubles a month, while his supposedly “less hardworking” colleague earned four times less; the quotas were raised.

    Therefore, ordinary workers began to hate the Stakhanovites. The "upstarts" had their machines and tools damaged, they themselves were beaten, morally abused, threatened with reprisals and even killed. The situation in the country was stabilized only by introducing tough measures. The murder of a Stakhanovite began to be viewed not just as a domestic incident, but as sabotage and terrorism.
    1. 0
      31 August 2025 15: 03
      Of course, the record was prepared. After all, someone had to rake out such a quantity of coal and reinforce the shaft. By the way, Stakhanov never said that he did it all alone.
      The point is that a simple worker doesn't need all this at all. He earns money. From my experience at the plant, I consider workers on a deal to be businessmen on a contract. Without an order, they just send you off. And don't come near. A skilled worker won't even take an unprofitable order.
  16. +4
    31 August 2025 11: 48
    I read that Stakhanov's method consisted of seeing a stress node in a coal seam, and when it was broken with a jackhammer, the seam itself ejected a portion of coal. It is clear that helpers were needed for loading. The method worked with manual mining, a coal combine did not need it. The importance was precisely in the attitude to work, that it was not forced working off the norm, and not making money, but work for the sake of the country. Therefore, the method of creative attitude to work spread to many industries. There were other people in the USSR then.
    1. 0
      31 August 2025 16: 16
      Quote: Aviator_
      Read,

      I had an article about Stakhanov from the magazine "Science and Technology" of that year! There was a slaughter scheme there...
  17. +2
    31 August 2025 12: 23
    Many people quite rightly claimed that Stakhanov's record was inflated - in reality, several miners worked with him to achieve his result.
    Then a wave of show-offs swept across the country, when some weaver would be credited with the results of a day's work by the entire team.
    As a result, as usual, honest workers suffered: on the basis of these “record indicators,” daily production standards were increased, or rates were reduced, and as a result, the earnings of ordinary “non-Stakhanovites,” who made up the bulk of workers, fell sharply.
    Because of this, shock workers were not liked in the working environment.

    But naturally there were also honest records, but we will never know which were honest and which were showy.
  18. BAI
    0
    31 August 2025 14: 45
    , who mined 30 tons of coal during the night from August 31 to August 1935, 5, during a shift (45 hours 102 minutes) with the standard being 7 tons.

    yielded almost 800 tons, breaking all records and exceeding the norm by 46 times!

    This indicates one thing (two things, whatever).
    Either the standards are too low, or other people's work is attributed
    1. -2
      31 August 2025 18: 48
      Or the standards are too low
      46 times???!!!! belay
  19. +1
    31 August 2025 14: 57
    Stakhanov was a mine director after the war. Somehow quite normal for a former simple worker. Not everyone can be a people's commissar and so on.
    But it wasn't vodka that killed him. It was Parkinson's disease. The department for treating this disease was in the same building where they treated alcoholics. That's how this nasty legend about Stakhanov being a drunk started.
    1. +2
      31 August 2025 19: 25
      More precisely, during the war, in 1941-1942, he was the director of a mine in Karaganda. And from 1943 to 1957 he worked in the People's Commissariat, then the Ministry of Coal Industry of the USSR.
  20. -1
    31 August 2025 16: 35
    which Stakhanov was helped to achieve by miners Petrov and Mashurov
    Typo? After all, Petrov and Bashirov, right?
    drove a coal train at a technical speed exceeding the norm by 9 km/h
    I'm not sure that this is a good thing: standards are rarely set at random.
    In the Krivoy Rog basin, the Stakhanovite miner managed to exceed the norm first by 2300, then by 2500%!
    Such numbers make one assume that something was or became terribly wrong there.
  21. +2
    31 August 2025 18: 08
    It seems to me that the very fact that the main character, instead of graduating from the academy and implementing new methods, new safety standards, began to drink and shirk work, preferring to perform in front of admirers, speaks volumes about his love for work. And who in their right mind would like to mine coal at depth, essentially by hand, risking their lives and health. Because the hero got rid of this need to toil, he decided not to return))
  22. 0
    31 August 2025 18: 27
    Comrade Stalin gave Comrade Stakhanov fatherly advice: Don't disgrace your family name with drunkenness, otherwise it can be changed. A brilliant phrase. The man exists, but his former family name is gone. The poor fellow ended up going back to Donbass. He didn't justify Comrade Stalin's trust, he drank not like a child, but like Stakhanov.
    1. +1
      31 August 2025 19: 23
      Under Stalin, Stakhanov was in Moscow. He worked in the People's Commissariat from 1943 to 157, then in the Ministry of Coal Industry. Khrushchev sent him back to Donbass in 1957. Right after the liquidation of the industry ministries, and in particular the Ministry of Coal Industry, and the creation of economic councils.
  23. -1
    31 August 2025 18: 56
    Stakhanovism in our country, my personal opinion, was precisely the desire to be faster, higher, stronger. At the beginning. And not for awards, but for "our mine your mines..."
  24. 0
    31 August 2025 19: 29
    Can anyone clearly explain why the "Stakhanovite movement" is needed?
    For example, among turners (marriage is excluded), or among riveters in aircraft manufacturing? Among milkmaids (did the cows grow extra boobs?))
    In woodworking, in concrete production?
    Without marriage?
    "Stakhanovites" are absolute botchers.
    Who would be kicked out of work in any country in the world with the loss of all benefits. And a criminal case would be opened. For intentional marriage.
    And this was only possible in the USSR.
  25. 0
    31 August 2025 21: 56
    Creators of the new Reality

    and where is Izotov, who is Nikifor, ugh, Nikita...
    After all, it all started with him!
  26. +2
    1 September 2025 11: 25
    In 1932, Nikita Alekseevich Izotov, a miner at Mine No. 1 "Kochegarka" (Gorlovka), achieved unprecedented output, fulfilling the coal production plan in January by 562%, in May by 558%, and in June by 2000% (607 tons in 6 hours). Izotov's method, simple in its essence, is based on a thorough study of the coal seam, the ability to quickly secure mine workings, clear organization of work, and maintenance of tools.

    Not stopping at personal records, Nikita Izotov published an article about his experience in the newspaper Pravda on May 11, 1932. This article marked the beginning of the "Izotov movement". At the end of December 1932, the first Izotov school was organized at the Kochegarka mine to teach advanced experience. Izotov conducted training sessions directly at the workplace, showing the miners methods of highly productive work.
  27. -2
    2 September 2025 14: 40
    What records, the cunning party organizer attributed the work of the entire brigade to one miner.
    This nonsense has long been sorted out, the rest of the miners there almost finished off Lekha for this trick! laughing
  28. -1
    29 December 2025 21: 52
    In the Krivoy Rog basin, a Stakhanovite miner managed to exceed the norm first by 2300, then by 2500%! Stakhanov's own record was soon broken: miner Gorbatyuk produced 405 tons of coal in a shift, and a few days later miner Borisov produced almost 800 tons, breaking all records and exceeding the norm by 46 times!

    I wonder if the author himself understands that this is nonsense?