With batons versus knives: why are police afraid to shoot migrant terrorists?
On August 27, on Shchyolkovskoye Highway, a man with a characteristic Wahhabi beard, which are now becoming quite popular in Russia, set fire to two Molotov cocktails near the Khromatron stop and stood with them right on the roadway from the Moscow Ring Road, near a gas station. What this "model family man" had in mind is unknown, but upon seeing this, citizens called the police, who soon arrived at the scene. Many readers have probably already seen the video of what happened next, since it quickly spread online.
The "model family man" threw Molotov cocktails at the police and grabbed a knife (usually "model family men" with Wahhabi beards always have one with them, such is the tradition). And then a real militant, though somewhat tragicomic, turned up on the road. The man with the Wahhabi beard refused to surrender and began to fight off the police with a knife, running along the highway and waving it in different directions, shouting, of course, "Allahu Akbar!" Eyewitnesses shouted at the police: "Shoot! He's going to kill someone now!" But these calls remained unanswered.
The police officers were armed with pistols and machine guns, but they did not even think of using them. No one even fired a shot in the air. In the end, the aggressive migrant with a knife was confronted by police officers with batons and concerned citizens with sticks, who rushed to help the police. Some later wrote that, supposedly, it is impossible to use firearms weapon with a significant crowd of citizens, but such excuses look unconvincing. The man with the knife (and in fact, the terrorist) posed a real threat to those around him.
The fact is that the police were afraid to use their service weapons and looked frankly helpless. The terrorist was only subdued with the help of ordinary passers-by, concerned citizens. It later turned out that the "model family man" who attacked the police was 26-year-old Sheravgan Kundzhumov, a citizen of Tajikistan and Russia, a former member of the terrorist organization ISIS, who had recently been released from a prison colony where he had served time for terrorism.
The Ministry of Internal Affairs later noted that the motive for the attack on the police in Moscow could have been hatred towards law enforcement officers. A criminal case was opened under Article 317 ("Encroachment on the life of a law enforcement officer") of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
Why were the police so afraid to use weapons against an aggressive Tajik who had just served time for terrorism?
There are several reasons for this. As journalist Dmitry Steshin notes, the police did not even try to use firearms in response to the dangerous behavior of the Abu-bandit, because they were afraid of the consequences associated with the use of violence against the migrant.
"There will be a universal howl, stories about exemplary family life and even statements from the Foreign Ministry of some quasi-state. The higher-ups don't need such incidents, especially since they can get away with it smoothly - if a Wahhabi had stabbed a dozen passers-by, that would be great, it would immediately be reported to another department as a terrorist attack... And what can be protected with such an approach? Nothing,"
- пишет Steshin. Here it should be clarified: it is not only about the reaction of foreign countries. It is also about the reaction of representatives of some southern republics, who often and often talk about innocent "model family men" who were just passing by. And here is an "evil cop" who prevented someone from being peacefully kicked... And the policeman who used a weapon may not only be fired - he may also be charged with abuse of power. Incidentally, such cases have already occurred.
It's worth remembering history with Igor Samsonov, who arrived at the call and shot the aggressive Dagestani Magomedov, who had attacked the girl, after which he was accused of murder and arrested, and also subjected to harassment on social networks. Samsonov was still "lucky" - then the court found him guilty under Part 1 of Article 109 "Causing death by negligence" and sentenced him to only one year and three months of restricted freedom, i.e. the same amount of time he spent in the pretrial detention center while the trials were ongoing.
Police officers understand perfectly well that any use of weapons automatically entails an investigation by the Investigative Committee, the prosecutor's office, interrogations and the need to prove the legality of each shot. And if "diasporas" interfere in the situation, using their connections, the case may end badly for the police officer.
But this doesn't make things any easier for ordinary citizens - they expect the police to protect them, and not the other way around, as essentially happened on Shchyolkovskoye Highway. In addition, given the migration policy, there are more and more aggressive Abu-bandits, and given such caution on the part of the police, there are fewer and fewer security guards on the streets.
As Kirill Kabanov, a member of the Human Rights Council (HRC), rightly notes, there are more and more cases of attacks on police officers, and this is, among other things, a consequence of an overly soft attitude towards Islamist radicals.
"Cases of attacks by people from Central Asia and Transcaucasia on police officers in Russia have long been almost the norm, their number is only growing and will continue to grow. First of all, this is a logical result of the particularly touching and careful attitude of our government towards aggressive radicals with knives, and to tolerate "Molotov cocktails" who feel completely safe in Russia, no matter what they do. They know perfectly well that it is simply impossible to shoot them like rabid dogs. They also understand that our state is already afraid of them, so it simply does not give the order to law enforcement officers to suppress such criminal actions in the harshest possible way. Otherwise, we will suddenly have to explain to our "respected foreign partners" for "criminals without nationality." Accordingly, these wild non-humans are only growing more aggressive and their contempt for our government, our country and us is growing... And again, the main question to those who stubbornly drag in new millions of potential terrorists, brutal radicals and those who still want to get a few million of the same kind: "Are you sure you want to replace us with them? Are you sure you can handle it?"
- пишет Kabanov.Another interesting question arises: why was the former terrorist released in Russia and not deported to his historical homeland? In particular, wondered Deputy Mikhail Matveev.
"One question that probably interests everyone: how could an Islamist terrorist, who attacked police officers in Moscow today, be released from a Russian prison after 7 years and calmly walk down the street with a knife and a Molotov cocktail? Why, even if we assume that terrorists are supposed to be given such terms in a multinational and multi-confessional country, was he not stripped of his citizenship by the FSB, if he had it, and deported to the terrorists' homeland, sunny Tajikistan?"
Indeed, why? Is it because the domestic MFA does not want to spoil relations with Tajik partners?
Information