Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek vs. Mao Zedong and the Communists

14 830 103
Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek vs. Mao Zedong and the Communists
Chiang Kai-shek in a photograph taken circa 1966.


В previous article We talked about the origins and youth of Jiang Jieshi (Jiang Zhongzheng), better known in our country as Chiang Kai-shek, who managed to become the closest associate of the founder of the Kuomintang party Sun Yat-sen and his successor in this post, and then the de facto ruler of the Chinese Republic. Today we will continue this story.



Confrontation with the Communists


In 1927, the temporary alliance between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China began to rapidly disintegrate. In March, Shanghai fell under communist control, angering Chiang Kai-shek. Having formed an alliance with a local criminal group, the Green Gang (which originated in the 12th century from a boatmen’s guild), he carried out a massacre in Shanghai on April XNUMX, killing between four and five thousand people. As a token of gratitude, Chiang Kai-shek appointed Du Yueshen, the leader of this gang, which made a lot of money from the drug trade, as chairman of the Opium Suppression Bureau.


Du Yueshen, nicknamed "Big-Ear Du"

The next day, the outraged Shanghai residents went out to demonstrate, which was shot at by bandits and Kuomintang fighters. All this became the reason for the rupture of diplomatic relations between China and the USSR (they were restored in 1932 – after the beginning of the Japanese aggression in Manchuria). And in China, a new civil war actually began. One of its victims was Mao Zedong’s second wife, Yang Kaihui, nicknamed Xia (“Little Dawn”) – the daughter of Mao’s favorite teacher at the First Pedagogical College.


Yan Kaihui

In October 1930, she and her son were captured by one of the Kuomintang military leaders, Onu Jian, who demanded that she publicly renounce her husband and the communists. The woman refused and, after many days of torture, was executed in Changsha on November 14, 1930. At that time, she was 29 years old. Her son Mao Anying survived and died many years later in the Korean War.

The communists did not accept defeat and in September 1931 they proclaimed a Soviet Republic in the territory of 10 regions of China under their control, with a population of several million people.

The Long March of the Chinese Communist Army


By 1934, the communists had managed to repel four punitive campaigns by Chiang Kai-shek's troops. Finally, in the spring of 4, the Kuomintang army, in order to deliver the final and decisive blow, headed for the capital of the unrecognized republic, the city of Ruijin. The communist leaders, led by Mao Zedong, decided to break through to the north, where they could hope for help from the USSR. 1934 soldiers of the Chinese Red Army remained to hold back the attacks of the enemy troops, and 16 set out on the famous Great (Long, Northwestern) March on the night of October 80, 10. It lasted a year and four days, and by December, the Chinese Red Army soldiers had fought their way through 1934 km of the most difficult mountain roads, overcoming four "lines of defense", the last of which was equipped under the supervision of German military engineers.

We remember that in 1924-1927, Chiang Kai-shek's chief military adviser was V.K. Blucher, to whom the NRA commander practically "prayed" at the time. Now, this role was filled by the German General Hans von Seeckt, one of the creators of the concept of maneuver warfare involving all branches of the armed forces. During World War I, he was for some time the Chief of the General Staff of the Turkish Army, then became the Chief of the Reichswehr Ground Forces Directorate.


Hans von Seeckt

Chiang Kai-shek's entourage included other Germans, such as Walter Stennes, the former Oberführer of the Nazi storm troopers of the Ost district and deputy supreme leader of the SA for the Eastern district. Not long ago, Stennes had up to eight and a half thousand storm troopers under his command – in Berlin, Brandenburg, East Prussia and Pomerania.


Walter Stennes, photograph from the late 1920s - early 1930s.

He came into conflict with Hitler and other NSDAP leaders, whom he accused of wastefulness, arrogance and conceit, asking rhetorically:

"What is more important: soles for the boots of the SA members or a palace for the party bigwigs?"

Things reached an open clash with the SS units. Stennes was arrested, but released from prison at the request of his old acquaintance, Hermann Goering. After that, he decided to leave Vaterland. At first, he became the head of Chiang Kai-shek's security, then the head of the "European information service of the Generalissimo" (chief of intelligence), and later began to cooperate with representatives of the USSR.

But let us return to the detachments of the Chinese Red Army and see that only 30 thousand fighters who remained by that time entered the city of Zunyi in January 1935, where they managed to replenish supplies and receive reinforcements. Mao Zedong was appointed the chief political commissar of this army, and from that time on it was he who actually led this campaign. Here is a poem in the genre of "shi" (based on folk songs of the XNUMXnd-XNUMXth centuries) that he wrote at that time:

The Red Army is not afraid of a campaign.
What thousands of rivers and ice on the rocks?
Five steep slopes to her - like the rise of low waves.
She will pass through the Uman mountains,
The wave will not lead Jinsha astray,
The Dadu Bridge will not be burned through by the cold steel.
The Minshan Range in the snow behind -
Joy blossoms on our faces.

In June 1935, Mao's army met with Zhang Guotao's detachment in Western Sichuan, who proposed to consolidate their position in the province. Mao did not agree, and the communist troops again separated. Guotao's western column was defeated in the autumn of 1936 by the allied forces of Chiang Kai-shek and the "Ma clique" (Xibei san Ma - military leaders of the Huizu people - "faithful, venerable Muslims", who controlled the provinces of Qinhai, Gansu and Ningxia from 1919 to 1949). After this defeat, Zhang Guotao went over to the side of the Kuomintang.

Mao Zedong's Eastern Column (about 10 people) headed north to Shanxi Province. Since Manchuria was occupied by the Japanese, the detachment was called the Anti-Japanese Vanguard. In turn, Chiang Kai-shek in September 1935 headed the specially created "Northwestern Headquarters for the Extermination of Communists". In mid-October 1935, having driven back the cavalrymen of one of the Kuomintang horse brigades, seven to eight thousand fighters of the Chinese Red Army completed the Long March in the city of Wayaobao. Of the veterans who set out on this march on October 10, 1934, no more than four thousand remained in this army.


Rally of Chinese Red Army soldiers after the end of the Long March

During this time of the “Great March”, they covered more than 10 thousand kilometers through the territories of 12 provinces, overcoming 18 mountain ranges and crossing 24 major rivers.


The Great March on the Map

Now the communist troops occupied the territory called the "Special Region of China".

It should be noted that this campaign greatly strengthened the authority of Mao Zedong in the Communist Party of China, who from that time on began to claim the role of leader. It was then, in 1935, that he was introduced to the Secretariat of the Central Committee of the CPC, and in 1943 he became the Chairman of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.

Moreover, it was during the Long March that Mao came to the conclusion that the revolutionary struggle should be based on the peasantry (which contradicted the ideas of Marx and Engels), an idea he promoted in all subsequent years. And in 1947, the CPC Congress proclaimed that the party “in all its work is guided by the ideas of Mao Zedong” (and not by the ideas of Marx-Engels-Lenin-Stalin!).

But what happened in China after the end of the Long March?

In 1936, Chiang Kai-shek's own generals rebelled against him, suddenly demanding to unite with the communists to fight the Japanese occupiers. Marshal Zhang Xueliang, the military governor of Fengtian Province, who commanded troops in Shaanxi, and General Yang Hucheng, who supported him, arrested Chiang Kai-shek in Xi'an on December 13, 1936.


Zhang Xueliang in a photograph from 1928.

The leader of the Kuomintang was then effectively saved by Stalin, to whom the secretary of the USSR embassy in China, I. M. Oshanin, reported on a meeting with the acting head of the Chinese government, Kong Xiangxi. He stated:

"If Jiang Zhongzheng is killed, China will certainly rely on Japan, China's human and material resources will be given to Japanese militarists, and will become capital of aggression. This is a serious threat to Asia and the Soviet Union. I hope that the USSR will find a way to guarantee Jiang Zhongzheng's life. As for other issues, it will be possible to seek a solution over time."

Mao's loyal supporter Zhou Enlai became a mediator in the negotiations, but Chiang Kai-shek, although he cooperated with the communists, did not forgive the general. Zhang Xueliang's fate is simply astonishing: at the end of December, he was arrested and spent 40 years under house arrest, and Chiang Kai-shek did not forget about him, even when he was forced to flee to Taiwan - he took him with him to Taipei. The former marshal received the right to move freely only in 1991 - 16 years after Chiang Kai-shek's death.

Chiang Kai-shek was nevertheless forced to enter into a new alliance with the communists, but only after the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War of 1937-1945. Chiang Kai-shek's son, Chiang Ching-kuo, also supported such an alliance. The hero of the article received the title of Generalissimo of the Chinese Republic, and the USSR became the first and so far the only state at that time to provide China with military and financial assistance, the volume of which amounted to 1937 million dollars in 1942-122,5. Of the 4 military advisers and specialists sent to this country, 211 died, 14 pilots received the title of Hero of the Soviet Union, six of them shot down 5 or more Japanese planes.

At the head of the Republic of China


So, since 1938, Chiang Kai-shek has officially headed the Kuomintang, and even the communists, led by Mao Zedong, recognized him as the ruler of China.


Chiang Kai-shek and Mao Zedong in a photograph from 1945.

It is curious that in the autumn of 1941, Chiang Kai-shek vainly warned Roosevelt of the Japanese intentions to strike Pearl Harbor (information was obtained from prisoners of war). The American president and his entourage then came to the conclusion that Chiang Kai-shek wanted to provoke a military conflict between Japan and the USA.

It was Chiang Kai-shek, and not de Gaulle, who was considered a member of the “big four” leaders of the anti-Hitler coalition countries – along with Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill.


Chiang Kai-shek, Roosevelt and Churchill, Cairo, November 1943. The translator at this meeting was the second wife of the hero of the article, Song Meiling, who was described in first article

In October 1942, Great Britain and the United States declared the annulment of previously concluded unequal treaties with China, and at the end of 1943 – the need to return the islands of Taiwan and Penghu (which were ceded to Japan in 1895) to China, as well as its northeastern territories immediately after the end of World War II. All of these are unconditional diplomatic successes of Chiang Kai-shek. Incidentally, it was the Chinese Republic (Taiwan), headed by him, that occupied a seat on the UN Security Council until October 25, 1971.


Chiang Kai-shek in a photograph from 1945.

Chiang Kai-shek's decision to refuse reparations from defeated Japan was controversial.

Defeat of Chiang Kai-shek and the Kuomintang in Mainland China


However, the rivalry between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China resumed, and the people's sympathies turned to the Communists. In mid-1946, a new civil war began, the denouement coming in April 1949, when Mao Zedong's troops crossed the Yangtze, occupying Wuhan and Nanjing. At Chiang Kai-shek's request, the Americans began evacuating his supporters to the large tropical island of Taiwan (its former common name, given to it by the Portuguese, was Formosa, "Beautiful"). It is separated from mainland China by the strait of the same name, the width of which varies from 127 to 224 km.


Taiwan on the map

It should be noted that this partially recognized state includes 86 more small islands. The total area of ​​the state is 36,6 thousand square kilometers (including all the islands), of which 35,5 thousand square kilometers is the area of ​​the island of Taiwan. Is this a lot or a little? Let's compare it with other countries. The area of ​​another island state, Jamaica, is 10 square kilometers, Belgium - 991 square kilometers, Moldova - 30 square kilometers, the Netherlands - 528 square kilometers. And the area of ​​the Russian Yaroslavl region is 33 square kilometers.

Dictator of Taiwan


It is believed that between one and a half and two million people moved to Taiwan in total, and on October 1, 1949, the Republic of China was proclaimed here. Chiang Kai-shek himself arrived here on December 10, 1949, taking all the valuables of the state treasury. The native population of the island was not happy with the newcomers, especially the new Kuomintang officials, and at the end of February 1947, an uprising began in Taiwan, which was suppressed with great difficulty only a month later. In this process, between 10 and 30 people were killed. On the orders of Chiang Kai-shek, martial law was introduced in Taiwan on May 20, 1949, which remained in effect for over 38 years. But we will talk about this in more detail in the next article.


Chiang Kai-shek in a photograph from 1950.

Mao Zedong planned to attack Taiwan in the second half of 1950 and counted on the help of the USSR, but the Minister of the Armed Forces of the USSR N. Bulganin told the Prime Minister of the PRC Zhou Enlai, who had arrived in Moscow:

"We cannot take direct part in this operation. We have criticized and continue to criticize the Americans for their interference in China's internal affairs. We do not want to find ourselves in such a situation. If we take direct part in the operation, it will be considered as direct interference in China's internal affairs, which is not to our advantage. Our participation can only be expressed in providing instructors, equipment, and giving our advice. If, of course, you wish it."

At this time, 3600 Soviet military advisers and specialists were operating in China.

May 21, 1950 Chief of Staff of the Group of Forces Defense In Shanghai, Guards Colonel Vysotsky, based on aerial reconnaissance data, approved a detailed map of Taiwan indicating possible landing sites on the island and ship approaches to it; specialists from the Soviet General Staff carried out calculations for a “landing operation of Chinese troops on Formosa.”

But on June 25, 1950, the Korean War began, in which the PRC army also took an active part. In addition, the Americans brought ships of their Seventh Fleet into the Taiwan Strait. fleet. And in December 1954, a treaty on mutual defense was signed between Taiwan (the “Republic of China”) and the United States, and in January 1955, the American Congress gave the president permission to use force if necessary to defend Taiwan and “associated positions and territories.”

By the way, in the USSR Taiwan was often called the “unsinkable aircraft carrier of the USA.”

In June 1954, Taiwan committed a daring provocation by seizing the Soviet tanker Tuapse and its crew (125 people) in the South China Sea 49 miles from Taiwan. Among the hundreds of Taiwanese soldiers who boarded the tanker were Americans, who are believed to have led the operation. The Soviet sailors managed to disable the engines, but their ship was taken in tow and brought to the port of Kaohsiung.

Unable to bear the abuse, 20 Soviet sailors asked for political asylum, some of them later returned to the USSR. The more resilient crew members arrived home in July 1955 and were even honored with a meeting with the highest leaders of the state – N. Khrushchev, A. Mikoyan, K. Voroshilov and N. Bulganin: earlier, polar explorers were greeted in this way, then – cosmonauts. In addition to state awards, the returning sailors received a year’s salary, bonuses and vouchers to a Crimean sanatorium. Based on these events, the film “ChP – Chrezvychaynoye Proisheshestvie” was shot in 1958, which, with over 47 million tickets sold, became the leader of the film distribution in 1959 (in this film, the Soviet tanker “Tuapse” changed its name to “Poltava”).


The capture of a Soviet tanker in the film "Ch.P. - An emergency"

Crisis in Soviet-Chinese relations


The deterioration of relations between the USSR and the People's Republic of China and the improvement of relations between the PRC and the United States led, among other things, to a reduction in tensions between mainland China and Taiwan.

The first blow to the traditionally friendly relations between the USSR and China was Khrushchev’s infamous report on the “cult of personality,” delivered at the 9th Congress of the CPSU. On October 1957, XNUMX, at the plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Mao Zedong declared:

"First of all, we have disagreements with Khrushchev on the issue of Stalin. We do not agree that he is dragging Stalin into the mud. After all, he is denigrating Stalin to the point of disgrace. And this concerns not only one of their countries, but all countries."

He was absolutely right: with his report, Khrushchev dealt a blow not only to Stalin, but also to the international authority of the USSR and the entire world communist movement.

Sinologist B. T. Kulik wrote on this matter:

"The refusal of the CPC leadership to follow Khrushchev on the issue of the Stalin cult was not caused by Mao Zedong's tendency to self-aggrandizement, but by more fundamental and understandable motives... Unlike Khrushchev and his associates, the CPC leadership was able to understand that, objectively, by aiming at Stalin, they were shooting at socialism."

By the way, people who grew up in the USSR probably remember a popular joke from those years:

"Why was Khrushchev fired? For the seven "K's": cult, communism (which he promised to build by 1980), corn, China, the Cuban crisis and Kuzkina mother."

The Chinese communists later acted much more intelligently. Deng Xiaoping declared:

"We cannot allow ourselves to be overly critical of Comrade Mao's mistakes. To do so and to try to denigrate Comrade Mao is to try to denigrate our Party and our country."

Khrushchev's resignation did not lead to an improvement in Soviet-Chinese relations. Mao Zedong wrote about Brezhnev and his entourage:

"This is the same Khrushchev ensemble. The political careers of its central figures are inextricably linked with Khrushchev."

But let's return to the turbulent 50s of the XNUMXth century.

In August 1958, the PLA began shelling and bombing the Taiwanese islands of Kinmen and Matsu, and in September President Eisenhower announced his intention to use tactical nuclear weapons. weapon. The Soviet leadership condemned this statement, but the USSR Foreign Minister A. Gromyko, who arrived in Beijing, informed Mao that Moscow was not prepared to intervene in China’s armed conflict with the United States of America. Further escalation was avoided, but the Soviet leaders realized that Mao Zedong and his comrades wanted to drag the USSR into a war with the United States – even a nuclear one. And they began to take more seriously the words spoken by Mao at a joint meeting of the communist and workers’ parties in Moscow in November 1957. Mao Zedong then stated:

"Can we guess how many human victims a future war might cause? Perhaps it will be one third of the 2700 million people in the world, i.e. only 900 million people. I think that is still too little, if atomic bombs are really dropped. Of course, that is very scary. But it would not be so bad if half of humanity were destroyed, then half would still remain, but imperialism would be completely destroyed and there would be only socialism in the world."

And in Beijing, after the August crisis of 1958, they began to consider the Soviet leaders "margarine communists" and in October rejected the proposal to build a Soviet submarine base and a radar tracking station in China. The Soviet Union, in turn, refused previous agreements in the nuclear sphere, and in 1960, technical specialists working in China were recalled. After the Cuban missile crisis, China openly called the deployment of Soviet missiles in Cuba as adventurism, and their withdrawal as “capitulation.” In 1963, an appeal from the Chinese leadership was sent to Moscow outlining 25 points on which the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China differed from the position of the Soviet leadership.

Soviet-Chinese relations were rapidly deteriorating. The CPC leadership now put forward a new foreign policy concept, the essence of which was expressed in the idiom "sitting on a mountain and watching the fight of two tigers" (the USSR and the USA).
In 1965, the term “threat from the North” was already in full use in China; in October 1968, Zhou Enlai declared that “anything can be expected from the USSR, including an attack on China”; in 1969, Mao Zedong accused the USSR of “social imperialism.”

In March 1969, fighting for Damansky Island began (and lasted for two weeks), then for another five months armed clashes occurred every now and then along the entire perimeter of the Soviet-Chinese border. But relations between China and the United States began to "warm" literally before our eyes. In July 1971, a meeting was held between the head of the Chinese government Zhou Enlai and Henry Kissinger, on October 25, 1971, the United States even agreed to transfer a seat on the UN Security Council from Taiwan to China, and at the end of February 1972, President Richard Nixon arrived in Beijing on an official visit. All restrictions on trade with China were lifted, and by 1976, China's total trade turnover with capitalist countries was 3,2 times higher than the volume of trade with socialist countries. And in 1979, the United States officially established diplomatic relations with the PRC – and, accordingly, formally severed them with its long-standing partner and ally, Taiwan (but, of course, retained close informal ties). One way or another, all this contributed to the reduction of tensions in relations between China and Taiwan.

In the next article we will continue and finish our story about Chiang Kai-shek and the Republic of China (Taiwan) he led.
103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    30 August 2025 04: 04
    In Beijing, after the August crisis of 1958, they began to consider Soviet leaders as “margarine

    Cool ... smile The current Communist Party of Russia also fits the definition of a "palm" party in the State Duma.
    Respect to the article and the author... hi An interesting outside look at the history of China and Chiang Kai-shek and Mao in particular...I look forward to the continuation.
    1. 15+
      30 August 2025 07: 25
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      I'm looking forward to the sequel.

      In 1972, Professor Morozov (Penza Pedagogical Institute) gave me, then a first-year student, the task of writing an essay on the topic of "The Personality Cult of Malo Zedong and Its Consequences." But what sources? The newspaper "Pravda"?! Collections of the Central Committee of the CPSU "The Personality Cult of Malo." Articles in the magazine "Abroad." In general, I worked hard and wrote an essay, I remember well which one. But... now I've read the material and -a- I've seen the work of a master, and b- I've learned everything that there was nowhere to learn then. In a word, excellent material, what can I say.
      1. +3
        30 August 2025 09: 53
        gave me the task of writing an essay on the topic "The cult of personality of Malo Zedong and its consequences." But what are the sources? The newspaper "Pravda"?!
        And detail laughing
        1. +2
          30 August 2025 19: 46
          Quote: ArchiPhil
          And detail

          I'll try it sometime...
      2. +3
        30 August 2025 10: 48
        Has the text of that paper been preserved? It would be interesting to compare.
        1. +3
          30 August 2025 19: 45
          Quote: Aviator_
          Has the text of that paper been preserved? It would be interesting to compare.

          No, of course not! But since I spoke with him at the historical section, prepared for a long time, there were many questions, then... I remember what it was about quite well. Well, and it is clear that it was incomparable with Ryzhov's work.
    2. +4
      30 August 2025 08: 16
      Well done, Valery. Wonderful article.
    3. +6
      30 August 2025 08: 40
      so the CPC today themselves have become like margarine, what is there from socialism and communism except words?
    4. +6
      30 August 2025 08: 56
      The current Communist Party of Russia also fits the definition of a "palm" party in the State Duma.

      Alexey, for God's sake, but don't tell *comrade* Zyu about this, okay? laughing
      Respect to the article and the author...
      I absolutely agree and solidarity with you! hi
    5. +5
      30 August 2025 09: 06
      I look forward to continuing.

      To be honest, there are only a few of these *masters of words* left on the site and they certainly need to, no, must, be appreciated!
  2. +3
    30 August 2025 05: 30
    The article is very interesting! I learned a lot for the first time! I will wait for the continuation!
  3. +5
    30 August 2025 08: 21
    Mao's wife:
    Together with her son, she was captured by one of the Kuomintang military leaders, Onu Jian, who demanded that she publicly renounce her husband and the communists. The woman refused and after many days of torture, she was executed in Changsha on November 14, 1930. At that time, she was 29 years old.

    The lines come to mind:
    "Nails would make of these people ..."
    1. +6
      30 August 2025 09: 14
      The lines come to mind:
      "Nails would make of these people ..."

      And I immediately see the faces of the current ....former *members of the CPSU* in power. laughingIncluding KGB employees.
      1. +4
        30 August 2025 12: 18
        This process was called "degeneration of the party".
        And it didn’t start in the 90s; in the 90s we saw the final stage of this rebirth.
        1. +1
          30 August 2025 15: 18
          Quote: Marrr
          This process was called "degeneration of the party".
          And it didn’t start in the 90s; in the 90s we saw the final stage of this rebirth.

          Quote: Marrr
          This process was called "degeneration of the party".
          And it didn’t start in the 90s; in the 90s we saw the final stage of this rebirth.

          и
          What would it be called, the result was the same - 91. Where was the party, where were the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the KGB? Questions? I don't think so, because? They participated.
  4. -5
    30 August 2025 08: 23
    He was absolutely right: with his report, Khrushchev dealt a blow not only to Stalin, but also to the international authority of the USSR and the entire world communist movement.
    Interesting logic - not murder 682 thousand fellow citizens per year , it was not the destruction of almost all of the country's top leadership, army, industry, etc. that hit his authority, but....the recognition of the fact.

    And what kind of "authority" can there be when, even in the OPEN trials of the 1930s, almost the entire top leadership of the country and the party was recognized as "spies, traitors, conspirators, thieves and scoundrels"?

    By blaming everything on the cult, Khrushchev tried to whitewash the party and socialism as a whole.

    If half of humanity is destroyed, then half will still remain, but imperialism will be completely destroyed and there will be only socialism throughout the world."

    Nothing to say - a "smart" leader...
    1. +1
      30 August 2025 11: 14
      Murder of 682 thousand fellow citizens in one year, all of whom were white and fluffy? Not a single bandit, murderer or other criminal element?
      1. -1
        30 August 2025 13: 42
        Quote: Grencer81
        Murder of 682 thousand fellow citizens in one year, all of whom were white and fluffy? Not a single bandit, murderer or other criminal element?

        this is only for counter-revolutionary crimes..

        Bandits and murderers - under other criminal articles.

        And yes, in normal years, about 2 thousand people were shot, but here - in three hundred times more.

        and also, nowhere, no one and never shot so many of their own.
        1. +2
          30 August 2025 15: 24
          There will be no link as always?
          1. -3
            31 August 2025 12: 14
            Pavlov's certificates, as always.
            1. -1
              31 August 2025 18: 17
              A.S. Pavlov? I don't find anything like that in his reference books...
              1. 0
                1 September 2025 10: 17
                These documents are impossible not to know:

                Certificates from the Special Department of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs on the number of people arrested and convicted by the Cheka - OGPU - NKVD - USSR MGB in 1921–1953. December 11, 1953

                https://istmat.org/node/57800
                1. -1
                  1 September 2025 11: 45
                  Since when did the Cheka-OGPU-NKVD-MGB of the USSR have the right to convict those arrested?
                  1. 0
                    2 September 2025 08: 42
                    from the Soviet ones - have you read the documents? It says who sentenced them.

                    I hope you also saw the number of people killed.
                    1. -1
                      2 September 2025 14: 57
                      So far I have seen the number of those arrested and convicted, and the fact that the special troikas included representatives of the NKVD does not mean that they were the ones who convicted the arrested. And numbers are an interesting thing, they can be manipulated as you like. "Non-brothers" often write to me that 1,5 million Russians served Hitler, although this is the total number of all former Soviet citizens...
                      And one managed to enroll 2,5 million in Vlasov's "army". And all of them, of course, Russians...
                      1. 0
                        3 September 2025 08: 48
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        the fact that the special troikas included representatives of the NKVD does not mean that they were the ones who condemned those arrested

                        Of course, they sat and signed for the sake of beauty. And they did not conduct the investigation and they did not draw the conclusions. lol . And even the NKVD Special Operations Department is not the NKVD.
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        And numbers are an interesting thing, they can be manipulated.

                        Manipulate with Pavlov's certificate lol

                        And show me, yes, where else in the world was there such a wild slaughter of its own citizens in peacetime.
                      2. -1
                        3 September 2025 13: 39
                        I can see the number of convicted people in this certificate for now...
                      3. -1
                        4 September 2025 11: 14
                        к murder convicted -hundreds of thousands behind 1 year..

                        Where else has this happened and when?

                        Never anywhere else.
                      4. -1
                        4 September 2025 11: 48
                        Without trial or investigation, the Russian Empire was killed in 1905-07. And there were earlier and later...
                      5. -1
                        5 September 2025 10: 16
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        Without trial or investigation, the Russian Empire was killed in 1905-07

                        belay lol
                        how million The VKPBE killed the rebels without trial or action in 1917-1933.

                        And in the revolution of 1905-7 victims as many as...9 TVS and these are those who were caught with weapons. 682 thousand for peaceful year
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        Yes, it happened earlier and later.

                        just remember - nowhere and never in the world have 682 thousand fellow citizens been destroyed. In Russia in the 19th century, fewer were executed than in 1937 in a DAY
        2. +7
          30 August 2025 15: 58
          Olgovich (Andrey), respected sir, it seems that you, as a lawyer, have never studied the Criminal Code of the RSFSR of 1926. Bandits and murderers were very often convicted under Article 58 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR and the corresponding articles of the Criminal Codes of the Union Republics.
          1. -3
            31 August 2025 12: 34
            Quote: Tests
            Olgovich (Andrey), respected sir, it seems that you, as a lawyer, have never studied the Criminal Code of the RSFSR of 1926. Bandits and murderers were very often convicted under Article 58 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR and the corresponding articles of the Criminal Codes of the Union Republics.

            Evgeny, it seems that you, as a lawyer, have never studied the Criminal Code of the RSFSR of 1926. Very often, pure counter-revolutionaries were convicted under other articles of the Criminal Code, in addition to 58, for example, under 59. So some of the counter-revolutionaries were considered criminals.

            For thieves and bandits there were articles 109,116, 59, XNUMX with points such as:
            59.4. Organization and participation in gangs (armed gangs) and organized by gangs of armed robberies and assaults, attacks on Soviet and private institutions and individual citizens, stopping trains and destroying railway tracks, regardless of whether these attacks were accompanied by murders and robberies or not


            Counterrevolution is something else - see Article 58.
  5. +7
    30 August 2025 09: 12
    Good, informative article.

    The film "Emergency Incident (Emergency)" (1958) is about the capture of a Soviet tanker by the Taiwanese.
    The role of the cunning Taiwan intelligence chief "Uncle Fan" was played brilliantly by the popular Ukrainian actor Vladimir Dalsky, one of the best roles in the film. An old acting school lost forever...

    I also remember when an old man from the district party committee came to my "model" school; the accepted practice of political education at that time was to inform schoolchildren about the situation in the world. This happened right against the backdrop of Nixon's visit to China, where Mao asked the American for weapons against the USSR. As is well known, they did not give the weapons, and the old man from the district committee explained why: "They did not give Nixon guarantees that the weapons would not be used against Taiwan. Thank Taiwan that it exists!...".

    The details of the capture of the Soviet tanker - a wild and tragic story that the Yankees had orchestrated - set Chan on...
    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%85%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%82_%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0_%C2%AB%D0%A2%D1%83%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%81%D0%B5%C2%BB

    In the photo below is Ukrainian actor Dalsky in the role of a Chinese spy...
    1. +6
      30 August 2025 09: 28
      [quote]Ukrainian actor Vladimir Dalsky[/quote,Sorry, but a Soviet actor.[quote]An old acting school lost forever...[/quote]It is very difficult to disagree with you. hi
      1. +4
        30 August 2025 09: 43
        I accept your correction...
        1. +2
          30 August 2025 10: 03
          I accept your correction...
          By the way. It would be interesting to know your opinion on why this happened. Actors of the old Soviet *school*, how could they have produced the current *actors*. bully
          1. +3
            30 August 2025 10: 19
            current *actors* .

            A question for us. How did WE make the current ones, how did it happen?
            1. +6
              30 August 2025 12: 32
              Your opinion, why did this happen? Actors of the old Soviet *start* how could they produce the current *actors

              In my opinion, the best answer to this was given by People's Artist of the USSR, famous director, Honored Teacher of the Russian Federation, professor at GITIS and the Moscow Art Theatre School-Studio Avangard Nikolaevich Leontyev:
              Only a theater with constant rehearsals and honing of acting skills can produce a good actor. Cinema and television give nothing at a professional level to an actor. Nothing. Except for a part-time job, of course. The liquidation of the strict acting rates for a day of shooting that existed in the USSR in the 90s and their replacement with contractual - producer rates, hit our famous Soviet acting school hard. This easy money defeated the theater. Alas... it is so. What is the point of rehearsing every day and gaining acting experience now, when
              any mediocrity with a pretty face only needs to pass the casting for countless talentless TV series to make a buck and gain instant fame? .. It doesn't matter how: through connections, for a kickback, for bed - the main thing is to pass the casting with the producer. And you're in chocolate. True, not for long ... In six months - a year they will forget you - new ones will come, the money and fame will end. You will be a "shot down pilot", your lot will be only TV shows and the tabloids. How many of these "one-dayers" have proliferated? Legion! (c)
              1. +2
                30 August 2025 12: 39
                This crazy money defeated the theatre.

                Money has won over good. Being determines consciousness.
                1. +2
                  30 August 2025 14: 00
                  [quote]Money, good won.[/quoteTom Hanks? For example? Not to mention the venerable ones.....no?
              2. +6
                30 August 2025 12: 39
                Leontiev Avangard Nikolaevich
                Recognition and awards:
                The Order of Merit in Culture and Art - for a great contribution to the development of national culture and art, many years of fruitful activity
                Order of Honor (May 30, 2018) - for a great contribution to the development of national culture and art, mass media, and many years of fruitful teaching activity
                The Order of Friendship - for great services in the development of national culture and art, many years of fruitful activity
                People's Artist - for great achievements in the field of art
                Honored Artist
                Gratitude from the President of the Russian Federation - for services in the development of national culture and many years of fruitful activity
                Laureate of the State Prize of Russia
                Among the students of Leontiev's Avant-garde are Elena Mayorova, Igor Nefedov, Irina Apeksimova, Sergei Gazarov, Marina Zudina, Evgeny Mironov, Olesya Sudzilovskaya, Denis Sukhanov, Vladimir Mashkov.
              3. +1
                31 August 2025 00: 09
                However, in Soviet times there were also famous "pure" film actors who did not work in the theater. Although there were few of them.
            2. +2
              30 August 2025 12: 41
              WE made the current ones, how did it happen?

              Let's go, without We, We are many, there are few of us. You, Sergey, probably consider yourself to be We.
              1. +3
                30 August 2025 13: 49
                You, Sergey, probably consider yourself to be one of We.
                I won't argue, but yes. We, our generation, are to blame.
              2. +1
                31 August 2025 08: 15
                Let's go, without us,

                Alexey, my friend, no offense, but? Don't you see that this is happening with our participation STILL? Even if it's modest, even if it's on the scale of one family, but it's happening? And the year 91 really *presses* on the consciousness, doesn't it?
            3. +2
              30 August 2025 13: 55
              How WE made the current ones, how did it happen
              Damn it! The phrase is simply bronze! Absolutely, absolutely! laughing
              1. +2
                30 August 2025 14: 18
                How WE made the current ones, how did it happen

                Damn it! The phrase is simply bronze!

                We, who are few, will erect a monument, "We", not made by hands, in bronze, during life, I hope the people's path to it will not be overgrown, in gratitude HIMSELF, a wreath, "We", will lay, and maybe will lay laughing
                1. +2
                  30 August 2025 14: 20
                  Quote: parusnik
                  We", will lay, and maybe will lay
                  Reply
                  Quote

                  laughing laughing laughing Oh damn!!! However! Plush! laughing
                2. +1
                  30 August 2025 14: 24
                  I love humorous people, you, Alexey, are definitely in the *top*!!!! laughing
                3. +4
                  30 August 2025 15: 01
                  Let us erect a monument to those of us who are few
                  [quote][/quote]Yes, there are few guys left. I really miss my fellow countryman *Sea Cat*.
                  1. +3
                    30 August 2025 17: 47
                    I really miss my fellow countryman *Sea Cat*.

                    And I often remember him.
                    However, Sergey, the fact that Kostya lived and worked in Moscow for a long time does not mean that he is your fellow countryman. According to Dahl, a fellow countryman is a native of the same locality as you. Konstantin was born in Pyatigorsk.
                    1. +2
                      31 August 2025 08: 06
                      Konstantin was born in Pyatigorsk.

                      He lived on Tsvetnoy Boulevard, and I lived on Samotek, that’s enough for me!
                    2. +2
                      31 August 2025 08: 10
                      The fact that Kostya lived and worked in Moscow for a long time does not mean that he is your fellow countryman.

                      Dmitry, he would be with you, I'm sorry, but he would not agree. And for me personally, he was and remains a Muscovite, in the good sense of the word. hi
                    3. +2
                      31 August 2025 08: 23
                      And I often remember him.

                      Once again reminds us that he is with us, on the site. I sometimes look through his comments, thank God there is such an opportunity.
                      1. +2
                        31 August 2025 09: 35
                        I miss him very much. I sometimes look through his old comments.

                        That's understandable. Do you want to be honest? Of all our numerous "soap gang", Kostya only had particularly warm, I'm not afraid to use this word - "fatherly" relations with three of us. With Anton - it's all clear why. With Lyokha Lexus, who often visited him in the village, bringing medicine and food, and - with you... Why? It was a mystery to all of us. Nevertheless, it is a fact - he treated you in a special way. He constantly praised you, looked after you and protected you. His most obsessive dream was to see you on "Violet"....
                      2. +2
                        31 August 2025 09: 42
                        He constantly praised you, looked after you and protected you.

                        Because... fellow countrymen!!!!
                        His most obsessive dream was to see you at the Violet...
                        Why? I'm fine on *VO*. bully
                      3. +2
                        31 August 2025 09: 58
                        you on "Violet".

                        Yeah, yeah, are you there yourself? recourse It's more fun here, to be honest! hi There is you, Anton, Lyudmila Yakovlevna, Alexey, Sergey *Korsar* and a bunch of worthy people whom I didn’t mention, forgive me!!!
                      4. +2
                        31 August 2025 10: 01
                        mentioned, sorry!!!

                        And with Sergei *Aviator* it’s not boring at all. laughing Not to mention his friend Dima*Reptiloid*! I won't even mention our Shpakovsky... because? Master!
                      5. +2
                        31 August 2025 10: 43
                        oh, are you there yourself?

                        Why I was forced to leave there - you know.
                        And Misha, Anton, Korsar, NikMikh, SerMikh, Alexey "ho khol", Sasha Asanov and Linniki are unfortunately very rare guests here. They are the authors there.
                      6. +1
                        31 August 2025 10: 46
                        They are the authors there.
                        .I know, sometimes it's academically boring. And the *enemy* is annoying. More precisely, his presence.
                      7. +1
                        31 August 2025 10: 48
                        *enemy* is annoying.

                        VikNik?
                      8. +2
                        31 August 2025 10: 49
                        VikNik?
                        He! Very much so. I just don't understand one thing, everyone knows that he is an ENEMY, and? No attempts to curb him. Why? Old memory?
                      9. +1
                        31 August 2025 11: 00
                        And what does he bother you with? All his comments there are literate, technical. No politics.
                        Personal dislike?
                      10. +2
                        31 August 2025 11: 02
                        [qu[/quote][quote]Personal hostility?[/quote]Yes, for God's sake! Do you communicate? Yes, you're welcome; For me, he is an enemy. He... treated our prisoners badly. Understandable, right?
                      11. +2
                        31 August 2025 16: 09
                        Are you communicating? You're welcome

                        I have never communicated with him or corresponded with him. The reason is the professional suspicion developed during my service, based on andexclusively on your and Konstantin's accusations VikNika. I'll say more - when his candidacy, put forward by Anton, was discussed by a general vote on Fialka, I was among the three who spoke out sharply against his admission, along with "MorKot" and "Alexey (hohol95)". I was still there at the time.
                        He... treated our prisoners badly. Got it, right?

                        Konstantin also claimed the same, Sergey. The accusations are very serious, but, as it turned out, alas, unfounded and not supported by anything. You yourself know Mikhail's character and his place of service before he became the owner of the Internet resource. He would never have so stupidly and primitively exposed his site because of a potential defendant. I will say more - Konstantin was unable to provide any specific evidence when Misha's colleagues checked. Mikhail sparingly informed all participants about this at the general meeting of the site.
                        I don’t know how it all ended - by that time I had already left Violet, and I no longer communicated with Kostya.
                    4. +2
                      31 August 2025 08: 28
                      I remember

                      His latest comments on the site.
          2. +6
            30 August 2025 10: 50
            Actors of the old Soviet *start* how could they produce today's *actors*
            Actors are not "produced" by actors. They are formed by a social order, which is now substantially different.
            1. +1
              30 August 2025 10: 52
              Uh, an excuse. Actors are formed by people, just like athletes. Are there new Ovechkins, Malkins?
              1. +5
                30 August 2025 11: 47
                Are there new Ovechkins and Malkins?
                Is there a need for them now? When there is, then they will appear.
                1. +1
                  30 August 2025 12: 08
                  Yeah, damn, yeah!!! Russians are everywhere, watch the NHL track!!!
                  1. +4
                    30 August 2025 12: 21
                    Russians are everywhere, watch the NHL track!!!
                    Well, the NHL forms them for itself, but why do we have a Ministry of Sports? What does it form?
                    1. +2
                      30 August 2025 14: 05
                      There is a Ministry of Sports? What does it form?
                      Reply
                      Quote
                      You answered it yourself, didn't you? laughing laughing laughingLike many... *Ministries**
                    2. +1
                      30 August 2025 14: 08
                      forms?

                      NHL????In fact! laughing
                  2. +1
                    30 August 2025 12: 36
                    Russians are everywhere, watch the NHL track!!!

                    Especially in Kun Lun, whose home ground is the 20-strong stadium in St. Petersburg. laughing
                    1. +1
                      30 August 2025 14: 31
                      Kun Lune,

                      laughing laughing laughing .You just made my day!!!!I'm going to the store, buddy! bully
                    2. +2
                      30 August 2025 14: 36
                      Petersburg
                      .It's hot in Moscow - 32!
                    3. +1
                      31 August 2025 08: 44
                      Especially in Kunlun,

                      Kunlun? This is simply an anomaly in sports! A typical offspring of the *KHL*! As well as the *KHL* itself, the *Continental Hockey League*!!! I agree with the question and the third point, but the first??! The main thing. Why humiliate yourself and invite incomprehensible teams to OUR championship, why? Typical Rothebergism.
            2. +1
              30 August 2025 14: 27
              actors*
              Actors
              Don't get upset, just work! Everything is in your hands! laughing
  6. +4
    30 August 2025 09: 53
    Good article. Respect to the author. A minor remark - Khrushch Kukuruzny's report on the personality cult was not in 1957, but in 1956.
    1. +2
      30 August 2025 11: 03
      Good article.

      I agree. About new people. Kislyak, Glebov, Abdulkadyrov in the forever beloved CSKA? Paarnishka in *Lokomotiv*? Batrakov! There are people, Rus' lives, but if there were fewer Rotenbergs and Millers *Zenit and Skovskiy*... it would be beautiful. And on the scale of Russia... ohh! good
      1. +5
        30 August 2025 11: 29
        The prospects for the return of Russian clubs to European tournaments are more than vague, and are not visible in the near future. As well as the prospects for the national team. It's high time to ban foreign players and give our guys a chance to play - with a salary cap, of course, so that the "roof" like Kokorin, Mamaev and Smolov "doesn't blow off". And in 10-15 years, you see, decent Russian football players will appear. And their own football "school" - as before. But no, clubs are toys of oligarchs and state monopolies, whose owners find it easier to buy another black man. Even if he is a drug dealer, like Promes.
        1. +4
          30 August 2025 11: 44
          The prospects of Russian clubs returning to European tournaments are more than vague, and are not visible in the near future. As are the prospects of the national team. Yes, my friend, yes! In the near future, categorically - no.
          like Kokorin, Mamaev and Smolov
          Honestly speaking, it's downright funny! *Stars*????On the scale of Mother Russia.
          And their own football "school" - as before. But no, the clubs are toys of oligarchs and state monopolies, whose owners find it easier to buy another black man. Even if he is a drug dealer, like Promes.
          And here you are right! Here is a unique, one hundred percent opportunity to play your own, but....? No!!! We will go our own way. A stupid one, but our own. You, forgive me, but for whom? laughing
        2. +2
          3 September 2025 11: 38
          Quote: vet
          The prospects for the return of Russian clubs to European tournaments are more than vague, and are not visible in the near future. As well as the prospects for the national team. It's high time to ban foreign players and give our guys a chance to play - with a salary cap, of course, so that the "roof" like Kokorin, Mamaev and Smolov "doesn't blow off". And in 10-15 years, you see, decent Russian football players will appear. And their own football "school" - as before. But no, clubs are toys of oligarchs and state monopolies, whose owners find it easier to buy another black man. Even if he is a drug dealer, like Promes.

          hello my opinion is that our football clubs have nothing to do there for 30 years
          Football in Russia is wild
          get paid a lot of money for being able to kick a ball
          shut down the major league for 15 years
          leave football at the regional level at most
          when we learn to play, then we will open the Russian championship and participate in other international competitions
    2. +1
      30 August 2025 11: 21
      Respect to the author.

      Conclusion. In Rus', I twist, I turn, I want to deceive, EVERYTHING is decided by a specific person in POWER! You know this. Putin is not STALIN, you also know this, he is... grayness and the offspring of grayness.
    3. VLR
      +6
      30 August 2025 12: 58
      Of course, Khrushchev's report was in 1956. We are talking about the plenum of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party - exactly in 1957:
      On October 9, 1957, at the plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Mao Zedong declared
      1. +3
        30 August 2025 14: 07
        I see. Somehow I didn't notice. The Chinese needed to realize this Khrushchev's trick and formulate their attitude.
  7. +5
    30 August 2025 10: 50
    On April 12, he carried out a real massacre in Shanghai.
    The massacre was not only carried out in Shanghai, but arrests and executions also followed in Canton, Xiamen, Fuzhou, Ningbo, Nanjing, Hangzhou and Changsha. In Beijing on April 28, Chiang Kai-shek ordered the execution of 20 communists taken hostage in the Soviet embassy. Among those executed was Li Dazhao, one of the founders of the CPC. After the massacre, the CPC Central Committee declared Chiang Kai-shek a traitor to the revolution, including Sun Yat-sen's widow, Song Ching-ling.
    So, since 1938, Chiang Kai-shek has officially headed the Kuomintang, and even the communists, led by Mao Zedong, recognized him as the ruler of China.

    Of course, in 1937 the Second United Front was formed, which continued to operate until 1946, between the Kuomintang and the CPC at that time during the Sino-Japanese War, temporarily stopping the Civil War in China.
    Mao came to the conclusion that the revolutionary struggle should rely on the peasantry (which contradicted the ideas of Marx and Engels)

    Of course, China was mainly a peasant country. Chinese communists begged the leaders of the Comintern in the 20s and 30s not to send us graduates of Comintern universities as advisers, they do not know and do not understand the specifics of the Chinese revolution, we are not Europe and not even Russia, we have many things completely different. By the way, few people know about this, during the years of the "cultural revolution", the main blow was dealt to party organizations, in factories and plants. Many were killed, sent for "re-education". The labor movement was essentially destroyed.
    1. +2
      30 August 2025 11: 15
      The labor movement was essentially destroyed.

      Alexey! good good good We have the same thing, my friend, where are the trade unions???? Answer? It’s a very obscene word, but it’s a word. laughing
      1. +2
        30 August 2025 12: 27
        I'm not talking about today, once again, during the years of the "cultural revolution", a blow was dealt to the workers' party committees. This is to the question,
        Mao came to the conclusion that the revolutionary struggle should rely on the peasantry
        Mao knew what he was doing in those years; it was no longer a revolutionary struggle, but a counterrevolutionary one. hi
      2. +8
        30 August 2025 16: 22
        ArchiPhil (Phil7), respected sir, trade unions - they are all different in the Russian Federation, everything depends on people. Lawyers boast on the Internet that they have won 40-50 cases.
        During my years as a legal labor inspector of the Interregional Trade Union of Shipbuilding Workers (when the smart guys from USC destroyed the security of Sevmash, Zvezdochka and Arktika, the security of these GRTsAS enterprises was carried out by departmental security of the Ministry of Transport, then the Ministry of Industry, who won tenders, because the FAS was everything, even in the defense industry) I had to defend the labor rights of security workers in court. In one year, I won cases of more than 150 union members in the Severodvinsk City Court and the Arkhangelsk Regional Court. There were women who, by court decision, received amounts of more than 2 months' salary (women's workweek in the Far North is shorter than men's).
  8. +1
    30 August 2025 11: 42
    Chiang Kai-shek appointed Du Yueshen, the leader of this gang that made large profits from drug trafficking, as chairman of the Opium Suppression Bureau.
    Cool - bees versus honey!!!!
    1. +1
      30 August 2025 12: 14
      Cool - bees versus honey!!!!
      Do we have Haffa? No. And won't be anytime soon, that's for sure!
  9. +6
    30 August 2025 16: 46
    Since the 50s, the island of Brevennik in Arkhangelsk has been called "Taiwan", just like the Northern Territorial District (the area around the former Solombala Pulp and Paper Mill, the First Five-Year Plan microdistrict) in Arkhangelsk is simply called "Sulfate". Well, Sulfate - the smell from the Solombala Pulp and Paper Mill is understandable - it was wow! But why Taiwan - neither my mother, who was born on Brevennik, nor any of my relatives could explain it to me...
    "In August 1958, the PRC army began shelling and bombing the Taiwanese islands of Kinmen and Mazu, and in September, President Eisenhower announced his intention to use tactical nuclear weapons." About 15-17 years ago, I read on the Internet the memoirs of our adviser about how the Chiang Kai-shekites had been shelling the coast of the PRC from the island of Kinmen for several months using 203-mm guns. In August 1958, when using 130-mm M-46 guns, whose shells did not reach the island by only 1-2 km, our adviser suggested installing the guns on log platforms to increase the elevation angle, wait for a tailwind and heat the powder charges. All these measures together allowed for an increase in the firing range of the guns by 3-4 km. Which was a complete surprise for the Chiang Kai-shekites. In 2 hours, the PLA soldiers destroyed both the artillery command post and the 203-mm gun batteries on Kinmen Island.
  10. +3
    30 August 2025 16: 55
    Valery, you are +++. Little-known, and therefore interesting facts.
    Especially "Tehran Kayak Conference"
  11. +4
    30 August 2025 16: 58
    In March 1969, fighting for Damansky Island began (and lasted for two weeks), and then, for another five months, armed clashes continued along the entire perimeter of the Soviet-Chinese border.


    Yeah, I remember those days!
    Although I did not take direct part in this conflict, we were, as they say, “on edge”!
    60 km to the border is nothing for aviation. And everyone expected the worst. But it passed!
    The only thing about my conscription was that instead of 2,5 years, I served 3. But otherwise everything was fine, and there was no fear!
    Many thanks to the author for such interesting material! 🤝
  12. +2
    1 September 2025 07: 55
    Quote: ArchiPhil
    I accept your correction...
    By the way. It would be interesting to know your opinion on why this happened. Actors of the old Soviet *school*, how could they have produced the current *actors*. bully


    In my opinion, there are many reasons for this.

    I will name one of the reasons regarding TV series.
    I was invited to take part in several popular crime series, and they were filmed by quite serious studios and directors.
    I have no acting training, I didn’t even participate in school amateur performances, although I am a good speaker and know how to command an audience (training in my main specialty).
    Somewhere on the Internet they saw me and... invited me to play one of the main negative roles!

    In our acting group there was only one kind of professional - a third-year student at the theatre institute.
    The rest of the amateurs, although some already had decent acting experience, had already acted several times.
    I came across good directors - they themselves showed me what I should do and who I should portray.
    They had a hard time with me and others, but the series turned out, in my opinion, no worse than others of the same category. It was a success on TV, the public "ate" everything.

    As I understand it, working with people like me has obvious advantages for the director:
    1) small budget, generally well paid, fed in a restaurant, but in any case much cheaper than persuading a star, and the box office of the film and the income from advertising are often not much less
    2) Professional actors, especially famous ones, are constantly capricious, have an inflated self-esteem, and are generally difficult to work with. In short, even from my personal observations, they love to show off like fleas on a comb. By the way, even the boy I mentioned above suffered from this from the 3rd year of the theater institute.

    You can argue, but a good director will notice even weak flashes of acting in amateurs and make quite decent actors out of them. There are many examples of this, even in the good old days - people did not graduate from VGIK, they entered - failed the entrance exams, but became the public's favorites, guaranteed the success of any film...
    1. 0
      2 September 2025 19: 41
      Quote: Timofey Charuta
      There are many examples of this, even in the good old days - people didn't graduate from VGIK, they entered - failed the entrance exams, but became the public's favorites, guaranteed the success of any film...

      And sometimes they didn't even apply - Evstigneev alone is worth something Yes
  13. Des
    +2
    3 September 2025 07: 30
    Nice to read.
    In VO this is quite a rarity.
    Thank you for a balanced, original article.
    1. Des
      0
      4 September 2025 17: 57
      "16 thousand soldiers of the Chinese Red Army remained to hold back the attacks of the enemy troops, and 80 thousand on the night of October 10, 1934 set out on the famous Great (Long, Northwestern) march. It lasted a year and four days, by December the Chinese Red Army soldiers had fought their way through 500 km of the most difficult mountain roads, overcoming four "lines of defense", the last of which was equipped under the leadership of German military engineers."
      и
      "In mid-October 1935, having driven back the cavalrymen of one of the Kuomintang horse brigades, seven to eight thousand soldiers of the Chinese Red Army completed the Long March in the city of Wayaobao. Of the veterans who set out on this march on October 10, 1934, no more than four thousand remained in this army."..."During this period of the "Great March" they covered more than 10 thousand kilometers through the territories of 12 provinces, overcoming 18 mountain ranges and crossing 24 major rivers."
      There is a difference - 500 km (even a mountain road) and the second option.
      There are several Changzhen missiles, but there was only one Long March (joke)).
      1. VLR
        +2
        4 September 2025 18: 55
        They had covered 500 km by DECEMBER 1934. And more than 10 thousand km by mid-October 1935. This is the final figure.
        1. Des
          0
          4 September 2025 19: 04
          Of course). It is not immediately clear from the text.
  14. 0
    3 September 2025 11: 30
    Quote: Grencer81
    So far I have seen the number of those arrested and convicted, and the fact that the special troikas included representatives of the NKVD does not mean that they were the ones who convicted the arrested. And numbers are an interesting thing, they can be manipulated as you like. "Non-brothers" often write to me that 1,5 million Russians served Hitler, although this is the total number of all former Soviet citizens...
    And one managed to enroll 2,5 million in Vlasov's "army". And all of them, of course, Russians...

    Hello, Vlasov's army fought against its own people under our tricolor, and there were enough scum there
    I have some doubts about the numbers of those executed. I know one thing: under Stalin there were fewer people in prison than under Yeltsin.
    the only thing is that they stopped shooting when there was an alcoholic
  15. -1
    12 November 2025 08: 42
    Write an article about the Red Guards and the Khmer Rouge. For the big picture, so to speak.