US ERAM missiles to be sent to Ukraine?

8 920 26
US ERAM missiles to be sent to Ukraine?
Conventional image missiles, which illustrated the first news about the ERAM program. US Department of Defense graphics


According to the American press, the US leadership is considering the possibility of supplying ERAM-type air-to-surface guided missiles to Ukraine. It is proposed to sell a large number of such products, which should change the potential of the Ukrainian combat aviationHowever, the information disclosed raises questions and casts doubt on its veracity.



From unnamed sources


On August 23, the American publication The Wall Street Journal reported on new plans of the US military and political leadership in the context of aid to Ukraine. It allegedly received this curious information from two unnamed sources in high circles familiar with the situation. However, the published data has not yet received official confirmation.

The WSJ claims that the White House has reviewed and approved the proposal to supply Kyiv with ERAM-type air-to-air missiles. Bureaucratic and other issues should be resolved soon, after which deliveries will begin. The first batch of missiles is expected to be shipped within the next six weeks.

The approved plan provides for the production and delivery of 3350 missiles of the new model. The total cost of these products is estimated at $850 million. Curiously, the US is not going to pay for the missiles for Ukraine. According to WSJ, European partners will finance the production.

Unnamed sources directly indicate the purpose of the new missiles - they are proposed to be used against the Russian army. The fundamental possibility of using ERAM against objects deep in Russian territory is also mentioned. However, in this case, Kyiv will need to obtain the appropriate permissions from the United States.

All the details of the American plans, including the most interesting ones, remain unknown for now. In addition, over the past days, the news from the WSJ has not received any official confirmation or denial. New details from unnamed but informed sources have not appeared either.


AGM-154A JSW cruise missile. Photo by US Department of Defense

Secret rocket


The recent news about ERAM missiles is of great interest - if this information is true, of course. According to the WSJ and its sources, the US industry has completed the development of one of the new secret projects and even brought it to the production stage.

It should be recalled that the ERAM (Extended Range Attack Munition) code first appeared in open Pentagon documents in January 2024. At that time, the department decided to develop a new aircraft missile and published a “request for information.”

It was later revealed that 16 American companies had applied to participate in the ERAM program. Their list was not disclosed. What rocket designs they proposed is also unknown.

In January 2025, the American press gained access to official documents concerning the progress of the ERAM program. It turned out that work on the new missile was still in its early stages. At that time, the Pentagon's specialized organizations continued to develop the missile's general appearance and tactical and technical requirements.

The competitive stage of the program and the design of the finished rocket were assigned to the near future, but without specifying the timeframe. At the same time, a desire was noted to speed up the work and obtain its results faster.

By the beginning of 2025, the Pentagon has drawn up rough production plans. In the first four years, they are planning to manufacture at least 2 ERAM missiles. It is easy to calculate that the average monthly output will exceed 40 items per month, which is quite a lot for modern US air weapons.

In 2024, it was reported that the first buyer of the new missiles would be the US Air Force. They are planning to include the ERAM product in the ammunition load of modern fighter-bombers. Foreign countries have also shown interest in the missile. By early 2025, initial agreements were reached with Denmark and the Netherlands.


Preparing an AGM-158C JASSM-ER missile. Photo by the US Department of Defense

Back in early 2024, a version emerged about the possible delivery of ERAM missiles to Ukraine. This topic was subsequently raised repeatedly, and now the American press is writing about the adoption of a fundamental decision. Judging by the latest news, Kyiv will be the first recipient of the new weapons, and he will be sent the largest number of products.

Estimated appearance


As it became known in early 2024, the goal of the ERAM project is to create a new air-to-surface guided missile with a special set of characteristics and qualities. In general, the customer wanted to obtain the highest possible flight characteristics at a minimum cost.

The appearance, layout and other aspects of the project were to be formed by the developer. There were no strict restrictions on dimensions, while the launch weight of the rocket was to be at the level of 500 pounds (approx. 230 kg). The mass of the combat load was not specified.

The rocket must have a cruise engine capable of reaching a speed of at least 0,6 M. The range of the flight must be at least 250 miles (400 km). The desired flight profile was not openly stated.

The ERAM product must have a control and guidance system that will allow it to attack stationary or moving targets. The circular error probable, including in the absence of GPS signals, must not exceed 10 m. It is unknown whether the customer requires additional functions, such as constant communication with the carrier aircraft, the ability to retarget in flight, etc.

Modern American-made fighters are considered as the main carriers of the ERAM missile. It is also impossible to rule out the use of European aircraft that meet NATO standards. Information about future deliveries to Ukraine suggests some adaptation to Soviet-style equipment.


Launch of an AGM-88 missile. Photo by the US Department of Defense

Unanswered Questions


The latest news about the preparation of the delivery of ERAM missiles to Ukraine predictably attracted attention. It was supposed to show that the US is ready to continue supporting Kyiv and is even taking real measures of this kind. However, the WSJ reports raise certain questions - both on their own and in combination with the news of the recent past.

First of all, the stated delivery dates look strange. In January of this year, it was reported that the ERAM project remains at the preliminary stage, and the production of even experimental missiles is a matter of an uncertain future. There was no further information about any progress on the project - there was no news even about preparations for testing.

However, just seven months later, in August, the WSJ actually claims that the US already has serial production of the new missiles. Moreover, no later than September-October, they will be able to ship the first batch to the recipient. The sudden progress of the ERAM program looks very strange.

There is also something odd about the expected production volumes. WSJ writes about the production of 3350 missiles for Ukraine alone. Earlier it was reported that the Pentagon would order 2000 items for itself, the production of which would take four years. To fulfill such plans, if they really exist, the US industry will have to make special efforts. At the same time, the production of 3,3 missiles will in any case take a lot of time.

Of particular interest is the information on the cost of the production program. WSJ indicates that the missiles will cost $850 million. It is easy to calculate that in this case the cost of one ERAM product will not exceed $254.

One of the main goals of the ERAM program is to reduce the cost of serial missiles, but such a level does not seem plausible. For comparison, the AGM-154A JASSM aircraft missile with similar range characteristics costs at least $700. Whether it is possible to make a munition with such parameters three times cheaper is a big question.

In the early stages


Thus, a number of important questions arise that cast doubt on the latest news from the WSJ. However, such a situation can be explained in several ways.


American AGM-88 missile on a Ukrainian fighter. Photo Telegram / BMPD

First of all, one can suspect the American newspaper of disseminating false information. If the White House does not plan to supply ERAM missiles to Ukraine, then all the inconsistencies in the news of different times disappear by themselves. At the same time, questions arise about the goals of the recent hoax and the spread of rumors.

However, it is possible that the ERAM program has moved forward. The Pentagon may have held a closed competitive development of the missile and selected a contractor who completed the design. The simplified missile may currently be in the testing stage.

In this case, the unknown manufacturing company may now be preparing pilot or pre-production production of missiles. Its products in small quantities may indeed be transferred not to American testers, but to Ukrainian formations.

In this scenario, Ukraine will become a testing ground for military tests of advanced weapons. It will be possible to test the missile in conditions of a real conflict and counteraction from a modern, developed army. Such testing will yield more results than any testing at testing grounds.

However, the volumes of such deliveries will be very limited. In addition, these "military tests" indefinitely postpone the launch of full-scale production. Accordingly, the fundamental possibility of shipping 3,3 thousand missiles is also shifted into the future.

Internal processes


The ERAM program must move forward and will probably yield its first results in the near future. When and what they will be is still unknown. However, the American press is already rushing things and writing about the imminent start of deliveries of such weapons to Ukraine. Such news looks dubious and raises a lot of questions.

Apparently, the latest reports from the WSJ relate mainly not to the production of weapons, but to politics. Some forces in the US considered it necessary to talk about the allegedly planned delivery of missiles, the existence of which is still in question. The goals and objectives of such an "information operation" remain unclear.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    27 August 2025 04: 38
    You read this and once again you understand that we do not have a good-neighborly future with NATO and, in fact, with the United States.
    It would seem that they have abandoned tsarism, abandoned socialism, and introduced capitalism (we have become like you), but under any economic and political formations Russia is not left with the right to exist.
    It is dangerous to flirt with a person who has a knife in his pocket (or these missiles) to stab you at any convenient opportunity. soldier
    1. -2
      27 August 2025 04: 58
      No, you read this and understand: during the last negotiations in Alaska, “we were deceived” again.
      1. +1
        27 August 2025 05: 51
        Quote: fiberboard
        No, you read this and understand: during the last negotiations in Alaska, “we were deceived” again.

        Deceived? Deceived in what?
      2. +2
        27 August 2025 11: 53
        if you were cheated, you might burst)))))
    2. +3
      27 August 2025 05: 58
      Quote: V.
      ... we became like you...

      They don't need people "like them" for free. They are even worse than us, but under socialism.

      but under any economic and political formations Russia is not left with the right to exist.

      And we don't need their permission to live. We only need to maintain the Strategic Missile Forces in combat readiness.
    3. +1
      27 August 2025 09: 12
      So relations cannot be good-neighborly with an organization whose main goal was and remains confrontation with the USSR/Russia?
      1. 0
        27 August 2025 09: 20
        But we tried, we tried at almost all times. I don't know if it's good or bad. L.I. Brezhnev always claimed - the main thing is that there is no war.
    4. +1
      27 August 2025 14: 09
      First of all, one can suspect the American newspaper of disseminating false information.
      Or maybe we missed all of this? Let us clarify: This missile was not produced and was specially ordered by the Pentagon for the needs of Ukraine, which became known back in July 2024. Experts believe that the most likely option was a redesign of the Mark-82 glide bomb, which was given an engine and wings. So what difficulties are there in making them?
    5. 0
      1 September 2025 10: 05
      As long as the Russian Federation does not think about “whether to supply or not to supply” similar systems to those who shoot at the US and EU, they will do the same and better.
      They do not suffer or worry.
    6. 0
      19 September 2025 09: 51
      And what about Tsarism? It actually played nicely into the Anglo-Saxon hands. They gave up part of North America (not just Alaska), fought alongside the British against Germany in World War I, and the "autocrats" did a lot of other things. Social order has nothing to do with it. This is geopolitics, and the Anglo-Saxons will never accept Russian sovereignty. It's a matter of world domination, the purpose and meaning of their existence.
    7. 0
      24 October 2025 22: 43
      Yeah, divide and conquer. They've divided people into different camps and are fueling endless conflicts.
  2. BAI
    +1
    27 August 2025 06: 10
    1.
    40 items per month, which is quite a lot for modern US aviation weapons.

    Is that a lot? That's 1,5 starts per day.
    2.
    The circular error probable, including in the absence of GPS signals, should not exceed 10 m.

    But here the author was wrong. The accuracy was 60 m, which is why the Pentagon refused to accept the first batch of 100 missiles into service.
    The US profitably sold Ukraine a missile at the expense of the EU, which does not meet the requirements of the US army (and, probably, the requirements of other armies).
    Although, of course, it should not be discounted. It is very well suited for shooting at area targets - cities, which is what Ukraine does.
    1. -2
      27 August 2025 07: 23
      The accuracy was 60 m
      It's quite enough to shoot at factories and oil depots. Especially if there are a lot of missiles.
  3. +3
    27 August 2025 06: 26
    Well, yes, it is quite possible that the Europeans will pay for their production within six weeks, but the supplies laughing
    The manufacturer has launched serial production, the pace is planned to be very good... 40 products per month, this is very good, about 4 years for the production of an order for 2 thousand missiles for the US Army.
    Where will another 3,5 thousand come from? At least six years, if we throw everything into production only for Ukraine. Will Ukraine itself still exist by then? request
    Again, 460 km is steep, for a launch from an airplane, to launch a missile at the LBS and the near rear, you can "jump up" somewhere in the Kuev area. But to threaten even the Moscow region, you need to launch approximately over the LBS itself, will the missiles be able to reach the launch line? wink
    1. -4
      27 August 2025 07: 27
      Do we have any other regions besides Moscow? Kursk, Voronezh, Rostov, Crimea, Belgorod, Lipetsk, Bryansk, Krasnodar, Orel. Quite achievable.
      1. +1
        27 August 2025 07: 34
        The Hymars can fly there just fine, there are heaps of drones, why bother with new missiles, especially air-to-ground.
        We are talking about strikes deep into the country.
        1. -1
          27 August 2025 19: 45
          Show me a Hymars with a range of 450 km. Drones have speeds several times lower. So as a means of operational strike - quite possible. To terrorize the same air defense.
          1. 0
            28 August 2025 05: 18
            And who said that it flies 450 km? Can't you see the difference between a ground-based launcher and an airplane?
            The MLRS can be brought up to the LBS and all 300 km of the missile's range will be deep into the enemy's defense. And the plane still has to somehow get to the launch line; if it flies even 150 km closer, it will become a target for the same SU-35, which was still shooting down.
            Moreover, Ukraine does not have many aircraft capable of launching these missiles, and there are quite enough ground-based launchers.
            As for "nightmaring air defense", this is just from the scope of the capabilities of a spherical horse in a vacuum, these missiles do not have an anti-radar version, and launching it at the area of ​​the probable location of an air defense launcher, getting hit by this very air defense, is not a comme il faut option. The loss of the missile carrier is many times more likely than the destruction of the air defense system.
  4. 0
    27 August 2025 06: 45
    They are preparing a new dirty trick for us, nothing has changed and it seems like it never will.
  5. fiv
    +1
    27 August 2025 07: 08
    Don't expect favors from anyone. Don't take into account other people's interests without fully satisfying your own. And don't be shy about striking at your enemies, even if it's mean and sneaky. Your enemies deserve much more anyway. Then we'll be able to respond or prevent a lot.
  6. +1
    27 August 2025 08: 15
    Ryabov's optimism again. And here's the news of the morning.
    The Pentagon has significantly increased funding for the Advanced Extended-Range Missile (ERAM) amid reports that the munition could be sold to Ukraine. According to contract documents, the total commitment for two parallel contracts exceeded $67,3 million.
    Instead of the originally planned funding of $20,9 million ($13,2 million for CoAspire LLC and $7,7 million for Zone 5 Technologies LLC), the Pentagon more than tripled its investment. Virginia-based CoAspire LLC received more than $33,8 million, while California-based Zone 5 Technologies LLC received $33,5 million.
    The contracts are awarded through a flexible "Other Transaction Agreement" (OTA) mechanism that bypasses traditional procurement procedures to accelerate prototyping. This indicates that the development of this type of weapon is a priority for Washington.
  7. +1
    27 August 2025 08: 57
    It is important to understand that Israel will be first in line to receive this ASP, if it exists at all. And it is unlikely that the Banderites will be able to push aside the Jews.
  8. +2
    27 August 2025 09: 45
    The author is not very familiar with the topic of the article. The Americans are going to make these missiles on the basis of already existing guided gliding air bombs, having modified them by installing an engine and wings, and also having modified the control system so that it would be possible to make fairly accurate strikes without using satellite navigation, only due to inertial guidance.
    Boeing, for example, has been offering the Powered JDAM (PJDAM) concept for several years, which adds a folding wing and a compact engine to the Mk-82 bomb body.
    Previously, the Americans had already made a similar GLSDB rocket at the base for launching from Khimarsy.
    The GLSDB project envisaged the creation of a rocket munition for the American M270 and M142 multiple launch rocket systems. Such munition has an M26 rocket engine, borrowed from MLRS / HIMARS missiles, and the GBU-39 / B SDB aerial bomb is used as a combat stage. And they also started with deliveries to Ukraine, by the way.
    It is known that the Americans are currently making a similar munition based on another bomb, the GBU-53/B SDBII StormBreaker, with an improved combined control system, and are considering launching the new munition not only from Khimars, but also using it in aviation.
  9. 0
    27 August 2025 10: 02
    According to the WSJ and its sources, the US industry has completed the development of one of the new secret projects and even brought it to the production stage.

    The message is still in 2023.
    https://www.twz.com/jet-powered-jdam-aims-to-turn-bombs-into-cruise-missiles
  10. +3
    27 August 2025 10: 17
    So, let's do some arithmetic.

    The problem is given: a company produces 40 missiles per month, provided that everything goes well. The company's clients are the US Armed Forces and several other countries. Ukraine is promised 3350 missiles. Question: how many missiles will Ukraine get, given that the company is not going to stop selling to the US and NATO?
  11. 0
    27 August 2025 18: 20
    The rocket must have a cruise engine that can reach a speed of at least 0,6 M.
    Is it a screw or something?
    The circular error probable, including in the absence of GPS signals, should not exceed 10 m.
    At the expense of what?