Military Review

Protect the territorial integrity of Russia

62
Protection of the territorial integrity of states is one of the urgent problems of our time. In the newest stories there are many cases of disintegration of states into components, attempts to separate part of their territory from states. The collapse of the USSR, the division of the former Yugoslavia into many states, the difficult situation in Moldova and Azerbaijan, the separation of South Ossetia and Abkhazia from Georgia and other modern territorial problems indicate the ongoing process of change in the world affecting the basic principle of international law - the principle of territorial integrity of states.


The Russian Federation is no exception, where the ethnic conflict potential (the North Caucasus) continues to be high and to the territory of which Americans from overseas gaze with appetite.

From the point of view of internal problems, the threat to the territorial integrity of Russia is, first of all, national-ethnic conflicts in the North Caucasus, the gangster underground of radical Islam, which organized the terrorist war in the region and nurtured the idea of ​​secession of the North Caucasus republics from the Russian Federation and the creation of an Islamic Sharia state.

A particular danger, which is clearly underestimated in our society, is the development of migration processes, under the influence of which immigrants from the southern borders of the state with a low level of education and a foreign culture rushed uncontrollably into the country. As a result, the processes of degradation of the nation, ethnic and religious strife are growing in Russia.

The indigenous population in the Far East and Eastern Siberia is declining at a catastrophic pace, and against this background the number of immigrants from China is growing rapidly. According to unofficial data, about 20 of millions of Chinese are already on the territory of Russia, are engaged in agriculture and business here. For the time being, the penetration of the Chinese into Russia for some reason is not perceived as a serious threat to its territorial integrity, and we look at it through our fingers.

A deep analysis of external dangers and threats also requires a new look at the territorial problems of the Russian state - NATO's eastward expansion, including the creation and deployment of new military infrastructure, and the plans of the alliance (with American authorship) to create a missile defense system in Europe, about which Vladimir Putin also writes in an article in Moscow the news"Russia and the Changing World." This is, first of all, about political pressure, which in recent years has been increasingly used by the United States and its allies as a tool for the implementation of their political and economic aspirations and carries a powerful potential for destroying the unity of the nations of the Russian Federation, dangerous territorial dismemberment of the country.

25 of October 1995 of the year spoke at a meeting of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States Armed Forces of the United States about the US program of action in this direction Bill Clinton: "In the coming decade, the following problems will be resolved:

- the dismemberment of Russia into small states through inter-regional wars, such as those that were organized by us in Yugoslavia;

- The final collapse of the military-industrial complex of Russia and the army;

- the establishment of regimes in the republics that have broken away from Russia, which are necessary for us.

Yes, we allowed Russia to be a power, but the empire will be only one country - the United States. "


This cynical, but, unfortunately, speech reflecting the real state of affairs reflects the true face of our "partners."

In 1997, former Assistant to the President of the United States for National Security Zbigniew Brzezinski proposed to divide the Russian Federation into three parts: European Russia, the Siberian Republic and the Far Eastern Republic. “Decentralized Russia,” said an overseas political analyst. “This is a real and desirable opportunity.” He also owns this dictum: "I would prefer chaos and civil war in Russia."

"Appetites" on Russian territory were also heard from the mouths of US secretaries of recent years. Madeleine Albright: "It is unfair that Russia owns such a huge territory." Condoleezza Rice: "Russia has too much land. Siberia should belong to the United States of America." Quite definitely spoke out before resigning and Hillary Clinton on this topic, saying that, they say, the United States will not allow the integration of the former Soviet republics in the post-Soviet space under the auspices of the Russian Federation. Hillary Clinton threatened Vladimir Putin so that he "would not go beyond the red line", behind which stands the "new Russian Empire."

The Alliance, led by the United States, remains the main force capable of satisfying these “appetites” and even today has no close analogues as a military organization that has already repeatedly demonstrated its “Atlantic power” (Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya) . And one can hardly agree, in this context, with the statement of Alexander Khramchikhin, Deputy Director of the Institute for Political and Military Analysis (“Military Industrial Courier” No. XXUMX 8) that the threat of NATO to Russia is greatly exaggerated, only in the imagination of the Kremlin’s full-time propagandists and the townsfolk deceived by them. "

Today, NATO countries surpass Russia five times in population, three times in armed forces and more than 30 times in military spending. Some European countries - members of NATO (excluding the United States) currently have 1,4 million military personnel. The Alliance has a nuclear weapons and means of delivery, as well as more than 23 thousand tanks (excluding other armored vehicles), over 10 thousand combat aircraft, about 650 warships (including aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines).

One cannot agree with the statement of Mr. Khramchikhin and that “the bloc does not conduct any exercises, which in terms of scale and scenario could be interpreted as preparation for aggression against our country”. For example, in April, the command and staff exercise Baltic Host-2011 was held under the leadership of the European command of the US armed forces and the NATO strike force in April. The exercise was positioned as a virtual event for receiving and deploying the many thousands of NATO forces in the Baltic countries. As a legend of the teachings, the invented situation in a fictitious state was declared, but what kind of state it is can easily be guessed. The virtual joke of participation in the Baltic Host-2011 exercise of the NATO strike force in the Baltic countries convincingly confirms the presence in the headquarters of the military planning alliance against Russia is far from defensive in nature.

Under the pretext of a peacekeeping operation in the Baltic Sea, at the NATO exercise Baltops-2012, the military leadership of the United States and NATO actually worked out the elements of a theater operation with an amphibious assault landing on the Lithuanian coast. Under the specious pretext of clearing the territorial waters of the Baltic countries from explosive objects left over from the First and Second World Wars, the annual international mine-sweeping exercises of the naval forces of the European countries participating in the NATO Partnership for Peace program are in the process of preparing ports of the Baltic countries to receive forces gain NATO.

In this context, great importance is attached to the planned for 2013 year NATO NATO exercise Stedfast Jazz-2013, which will be held simultaneously in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland. The planning team of these exercises is already working in the Joint Headquarters of the Lithuanian Armed Forces in Vilnius. In addition to representatives of the Baltic countries, representatives of the General Staff of the Joint NATO Forces in Europe, the Joint Base of the NATO Forces also participate in the work of the group. A special feature of the Stedfast Jazz-2013 exercises planned for 2013 year is that they will be combined with the Baltic Host-2013 NATO exercises in terms of enhancing the process of receiving the alliance forces in the Baltic countries in a threatened period.

These and other similar NATO exercises potentially reduce the security of Russia on its western borders, and they should be interpreted, contrary to the opinion of representatives of the Institute of Political and Military Analysis, only as "preparing for aggression against our country."

All the above indicates that the problem of protecting the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation is relevant today and again relevant, and once again confirms the assessment of the situation given by Vladimir Putin: "... We see what is happening in the world. As the saying goes, comrade wolf knows who to eat He eats - and does not listen to anyone. And apparently, he does not intend to listen. "
Author:
Originator:
http://peacekeeper.ru/
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. smel
    smel April 19 2013 06: 58 New
    21
    I agree in many respects with the author. I completely agree with the name. Only now, threats to the integrity of the state are far from completely defined (listed). Teaching near our European borders is not a good event for us. But besides the military component, there are economic, demographic, and religious, even environmental threats. But the response to them is not always adequate.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov April 19 2013 07: 14 New
      31
      Quote: smel
      I agree in many respects with the author.

      For starters, let the author show where 20 million Chinese live in Russia. In a country of 145 million, we must face the Chinese at every corner.
      I don’t want to talk about Brzezinski, a clown soothsayer whose everything went wrong, a loser!
      With regard to the exercises, the Baltic states, up to 40% of our population there, with such rear areas they only go on the offensive laughing And Poland. As it was a prostitute, it remained so, they use rams and they will sit on the ruins.
      1. nickname 1 and 2
        nickname 1 and 2 April 19 2013 09: 25 New
        +4
        Let's start with = Bill Clinton: "In the next decade, the following problems will be solved:

        - the dismemberment of Russia into small states through inter-regional wars, such as those that were organized by us in Yugoslavia;

        - The final collapse of the military-industrial complex of Russia and the army;

        - the establishment of regimes in the republics that have broken away from Russia, which are necessary for us.

        Yes, we allowed Russia to be a power, but the empire will be only one country - the United States. "

        In the United States, 300 million. and how many normal ones were found who told Clinton:
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        clown diviner
        !
        What are you talking about? What did they annoy you with? Why do you want to destroy Ozel to destroy the country that saved the world and your states from fascism?

        After all, following the logic and motivation of Labeled: "guys, let's live together! You don't like socialism and we are abandoning it! We will cut our ships, destroy tanks, destroy missiles"

        So what ? Where is the response?

        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        up to 40% of our population there,

        What can the unarmed do? Do you keep a muzzle in your pocket? Paste leaflets?
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        I don’t want to talk about Brzezinski

        Well, ours laughed a lot from the words of Zhirik about the Indian Ocean, but did anyone in the states giggle from the words of Bzierzyk?
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And Poland. As a prostitute,
        = But what's the point of this? Here you don’t know how to talk with your native Khoklams.

        Or didn’t they hear and don’t know the crests and pesheks about Clinton’s speech? And what do they think IM what fate is allotted?
        Nonetheless!
        You see, it didn’t work out for good!
        And agitators like Khramchikhin we have already heard enough.
        It remains to create a better army and navy. It doesn’t work out differently.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 19 2013 10: 01 New
          +1
          Quote: nick 1 and 2
          What are you talking about? What did they annoy you with? Why do you want to destroy Ozel to destroy the country that saved the world and your states from fascism?

          Sorry, this is what you wrote back to me or ..... to whom?
          1. nickname 1 and 2
            nickname 1 and 2 April 19 2013 10: 27 New
            +3
            Sorry! Well, of course to Clinton!

            So I thought that you would not read it correctly, I wanted to fix it, but the reaction of the site is so slow that it refused to "change"

            There your "clown soothsayer" was inserted in the wrong place.
        2. nickname 1 and 2
          nickname 1 and 2 April 19 2013 10: 14 New
          +2
          And yet = this is how simple it would seem:
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          then the Baltic states, there up to 40% of our population

          So what ? Here's how, if it happens, shoot? every second is OUR!
          How many of their soldiers will have to be invested to take, if necessary, without a SINGLE SHOT?

          PREVENTIVE IMPACT IS POSSIBLE? No! So it turns out that the NATA troops will accumulate for the strike,
          and we won’t be able to do anything.

          It turns out they need to be persuaded to resettle in Russia.
      2. Akatsubasa
        Akatsubasa April 19 2013 15: 30 New
        +3
        Well, 20 million Chinese is still only a prospect, now they are approximately in the region of a million officially (and 2,5 in fact). The main thing is that in 50-60 years it does not work out with this prospect, they will first want equal rights in a secular democratic country, and then go and reach for power, as is now happening with our friends from the southern republics. But the Chinese are still afraid, or rather just hid. As one modern satirist said about this problem: "200 million are afraid to poke their attention to 200 thousand, this is the way Russia should remain!" Only if our authorities continue to do what they are doing now in the Far East (for a start, at least there), there will be red sentries everywhere on the Sino-Finnish border) And few Russians are interested in this situation)
      3. AndreyAB
        AndreyAB April 20 2013 06: 08 New
        0
        The Baltic states are not a warrior, but the territory through which others can pass and concentrate, Poland has always been the enemy of any tsarist, socialist, capitalist Russia - it is an implacable enemy willing to cooperate with anyone but against Russia. At the expense of the Chinese, so take a trip to the Transbaikalia and the Far East, the old military towns abandoned with excellent runways are almost completely populated by the Chinese, plus the islands along the Amur River, in general, the fifth column has long been formed, and the exercises, our train with little blood terrorists fight, and they learn to seize territories, so it’s not so rosy at all and you won’t be able to throw hats.
    2. tronin.maxim
      tronin.maxim April 19 2013 07: 16 New
      0
      Quote: smel
      But the response to them is not always adequate.

      And time is ticking!
    3. vadimus
      vadimus April 19 2013 09: 51 New
      +2
      Russia has always had enough envious, and therefore enemies. But if all together and wisely ..., we will break through.
      1. S_mirnov
        S_mirnov April 19 2013 19: 06 New
        +2
        The desire to separate Russia from the outside is not news for a long time. But while All sorts of Bush-Clintons are pushing speeches, Russia has long been torn to pieces. It is strange that the author did not touch on these topics. Probably afraid to get a hat.
        Fill in the blanks.
        "The 2010 agreement between Russia and Norway, which crowned years of negotiations on the borders in the Barents Sea, may turn out to be quite unsuccessful for Moscow. For its northern neighbors, this agreement has already turned into the greatest joy - substantial reserves of hydrocarbons have been found in the territory that was ceded to the Norwegians. Russian officials are indignant: the Norwegians and this is how the northern “fish maternity hospitals” are being ruined, and now they are putting the domestic cod fishery at risk. "
        "Negotiations on the need to demarcate the disputed territory in the Barents Sea with an area of ​​about 175 thousand square kilometers have been conducted between the USSR and Norway since the 1970s. The Russian position was to divide this part of the sea according to the" sectoral principle "within the boundaries of polar possessions established in 1926, drawn along the meridian to the North Pole.The Norwegian position was to divide the territory of the Barents Sea along the median line.

        As a result, the parties agreed to divide the disputed territory in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean into two equal parts. “This event should affect the general situation in the region, strengthen international and regional security, and deepen the interaction of the Arctic states,” said then-President Dmitry Medvedev after signing the relevant agreements with Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg.
        http://svoim.info/201316/?16_2_3
        I gave the islands to China
        http://newsland.com/news/detail/id/567216/
        http://www.yaplakal.com/forum1/topic427428.html
        http://argumenti.ru/politics/n289/107368
      2. Nick
        Nick April 19 2013 21: 39 New
        +1
        Quote: vadimus
        But if all together and wisely ..., we will break through

        That's it! If all together! It is they who are aiming here, trying to influence the incitement of interethnic, interfaith conflicts, social strife. All this so that we are not "all together" ...
  2. djon3volta
    djon3volta April 19 2013 07: 05 New
    -8
    We see what is happening in the world. As they say, comrade wolf knows whom to eat. Eats - and listens to no one. And, apparently, he is not going to listen. "

    The film "Putin's System" was the most scandalous at the Amsterdam documentary festival, the film was awarded many awards.
    The film is about Vladimir Putin and his rise to power in Russia.

    Putin said these words here, see from 1:11:00

    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov April 19 2013 07: 35 New
      +5
      Quote: djon3volta
      The film is about Vladimir Putin and his rise to power in Russia.

      Putin again belay 3Volta, everyone here knows how Putin came to power and what he said.
      John - I’ll tell you a secret, you are in Russian website wink
      1. djon3volta
        djon3volta April 19 2013 07: 51 New
        -9
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        everyone here knows how Putin came to power and what he said.

        the film was shot by the French and made for a Western audience. therefore, it’s worth watching what is being stamped for the West and how to present Putin and Russia to the audience. You either didn’t understand what I’m talking about, or you understand but want to show that I’m a stupid EGEshnik naive Nanai boy, and you are a professor with three higher educations, something like that you present it.
        I want to note that if I make spelling mistakes, then this soviet education fails me, the USE was not there then.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 19 2013 08: 19 New
          15
          Quote: djon3volta

          the film was shot by the French and made for a Western audience. Therefore, it is worth watching what is stamped for the West and how is it presented to the audience

          And then damn it is not visible how they present Russia in the media, do you want to watch Western bullshit, look.
          Quote: djon3volta
          I’m a stupid USE, a naive Nanai boy,

          Note is you said wink
          Quote: djon3volta
          I want to note, if I make spelling mistakes, then this shovel education fails me

          I lived in the USSR, and you are in the scoop! I also make mistakes, probably I had to study better.
          1. djon3volta
            djon3volta April 19 2013 08: 26 New
            -10
            listen mister / comrade, if I call your eyes with my comments, put me on the black list and the problem disappears hi
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov April 19 2013 09: 31 New
              +3
              Quote: djon3volta
              if I call your eyes with my comments, blacklist me

              I can not laughing
          2. baltika-18
            baltika-18 April 19 2013 13: 02 New
            +7
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            I lived in the USSR, and you are in the scoop!

            I liked it. He said well.
            Eugene before you write anything, first think.
        2. Akatsubasa
          Akatsubasa April 19 2013 15: 48 New
          +2
          If you mean an attempt to turn their weapons against themselves, well, the very same RT is already opposed to many networks of "potential adversaries" in terms of audience coverage, and it works in a slightly different way. Consideration of the position from different sides is not unique for this format, but it was swallowed with a bang)

          ps I was especially pleased with the "Stalinist-Putin KGB system" xD It's just a masterpiece of fevered thinking)
    2. ioann1
      ioann1 April 19 2013 17: 52 New
      +3
      To John: "The Putin System" was the most scandalous at the Amsterdam Documentary Festival, the film won many awards.
      The film is about Vladimir Putin and his rise to power in Russia.

      these words Putin said here, look from 1:11:00 "(C)

      These kindergarten films. Do you think you will surprise someone with these "facts"? Even discussing it is not serious!
  3. mogus
    mogus April 19 2013 07: 05 New
    +8
    << The indigenous population in the regions of the Far East and Eastern Siberia is decreasing at a catastrophic rate, and against this background the number of immigrants from China is growing rapidly. >>
    The population is decreasing, this is true (I myself live in Transbaikalia, Eastern Siberia). As for the Chinese, it is controversial, they came to us as if on a watch (until they "tightened the screws" with the forest). Only a few remain, and they are assimilated. There were no problems with them. Central Asian settlers raise more questions.
    So that people do not leave, you only need to work with a normal z.p. How to provide it? It’s simple, to leave us a little more from taxes, and not like that:
    "Life in Siberia,
    Of course, it’s difficult, but I must say the truth: not because
    that there are few
    money, but because from there
    take a lot. Almost 75%
    Russian exports in 2012
    ($ 410 billion) are goods mined or
    recycled beyond the Urals. AND
    6,5 trillion rubles, or 50,7% of all
    federal income
    budget - income from
    mining tax and duty on
    oil, gas and
    petroleum products. "http://gefsimany.com/?p=2842

    http://gnkk.ru/articles/stsenarii-razvitiya-sibiri.html
    1. djon3volta
      djon3volta April 19 2013 07: 13 New
      0
      about 20 million illegal Chinese, I’m pretty sure this is overkill. unofficial data? and where can I read them? links are there? who and when did they count? you can write 100 million Chinese, but at least some minimal facts are needed to confirm the words! About 20 million Chinese lies. Something NPO considered for reporting to the State Department.
      1. mogus
        mogus April 19 2013 07: 30 New
        0
        if there really are 20 million Chinese here, then "NiHao" will receive answers from this territory.
        The Chinese have their own cockroaches in their head, but you can deal with them.
        1. mogus
          mogus April 19 2013 09: 18 New
          0
          for minus, I ask for justification.
          NiHao (NiHao) - so they welcome (hello, hello, healthy).
      2. Batman
        Batman April 19 2013 23: 02 New
        0
        about 20 million illegal Chinese, I’m pretty sure this is overkill. unofficial data? and where can I read it? Is there any links? Who and when did they count?

        These statistics were considered by great English scientists)))
    2. ultra
      ultra April 19 2013 08: 42 New
      +1
      Quote: mogus
      More questions are raised by Central Asian migrants.

      Well, even if it’s in the east of Siberia, then one conclusion is one of the main threats for us! IMHO not just a passport entry, but a ban on citizenship and a time limit for staying in Russia! hi
      1. mogus
        mogus April 19 2013 09: 34 New
        +3
        these are the ones who have gotten themselves into perestroika. Arrogance and self-conceit and rushing, but in the inside @ "> <" @.
        One Azerbaijani tried to come to a showdown, from Irkutsk, for 700 km., But it was clearly explained to him that at the given moment he was at a specific address, the cell phone of the woman (his mistress), whose husband works in the FSB, is in the same apartment ... then they told how his poor fellow was shaking ...
      2. mogus
        mogus April 19 2013 09: 35 New
        0
        these are the ones who have gotten themselves into perestroika. Arrogance and self-conceit and rushing, but in the inside @ "> <" @.
        One Azerbaijani tried to come to a showdown, from Irkutsk, for 700 km., But it was clearly explained to him that at the given moment he was at a specific address, the cell phone of the woman (his mistress), whose husband works in the FSB, is in the same apartment ... then they told how his poor fellow was shaking ...
    3. Sirocco
      Sirocco April 19 2013 15: 55 New
      +3
      How many copies have been broken about Siberia and the Far East, about the need to invest, develop, and attract the population of the country to move to the Far East. But things are still there. Let's be honest, anyone moves, assimilates in these regions of Russia, but not Russians, Chinese, and residents of Central Asia. Here is an example from China, where those who want to do business in the Russian Federation, who want to marry citizens of the Russian Federation, are allocated money for "start-up" capital to move to the Russian Federation. Almost like ours, just the opposite. Alas, with such an approach (chatter), in 100 years, the integrity of Siberia and the Far East will not have to be defended. You don’t understand who will live there, whether the Chinese, or the Russians, or citizens Wed. Asia.
  4. Nesvet Nezar
    Nesvet Nezar April 19 2013 07: 18 New
    +9
    Intimidating article.
    What to do then?
    What are the conclusions?
    Should we hand over 1000 rubles to the Ministry of Defense?
    Or go to a demonstration?
    Or sit around experiencing how the great Balts, who are dying faster than us, are rehearsing their funerals?

    The whole Estonian Navy is a dangerous thing ....

    Urgent measures to strengthen Russia's defense capability are to increase the population by 30 million. People due to the birth rate in the next 20 years. This can be achieved only if 50 million Russians give birth to 75 million Russians (three children per family) But this is not possible. Ha ha ha Children are expensive and hard. We are gentle. We can shout about our GREATNESS only in the past tense. More interesting car, apartment, heifer, warcraft (or tanks). The government is still to blame, it does not sleep with our women ... It is still interesting to unite on the Internet against Caucasians who give birth, and who apparently will defend their homeland instead of us ...
    1. explorer
      explorer April 19 2013 08: 59 New
      +3
      Conclusions? what There can be only one - work with youth: Drive their thoughts into their heads fool
      Nearby there are schools to go and work with children there.
    2. Kolya
      Kolya April 19 2013 10: 17 New
      +1
      What to do? - It’s cruel to catch corruption by physical and economic measures once, and if the society is divided into the very rich and the poor, it still doesn’t work out, since this is the basis of the oppression, these are two. Everything else will begin to recover by itself by the trailer.
      1. nickname 1 and 2
        nickname 1 and 2 April 19 2013 10: 52 New
        +1
        Quote: Kohl
        What to do?

        Quote: Kohl
        What to do?



        1. do not interfere! do not bother! do not bother!

        All that can be done! Everyone says and knows what needs to be done! And no one says how to do it
        (especially if you get in the way)!
  5. CCA
    CCA April 19 2013 07: 22 New
    10
    Over the centuries, all attempts to violate the integrity of the Russian world have never led to long-term results. And vice versa, after each attempt, integrity was restored and strengthened ... And I have no doubt that this will happen this time too ... and quite soon ...
  6. Tatarus
    Tatarus April 19 2013 07: 23 New
    +5
    And why wait? Annex the Baltic states, drop a couple of Pshekam planes to Warsaw. Ukraine, if it doesn’t calm down, divided.
    Ah and my bloodthirsty dreams ...
    But what to expect then? When again treacherously attacked.
    1. individual
      individual April 19 2013 08: 42 New
      0
      We are not bloodthirsty, but half a bucket is enough for me to hang out.
  7. Nitarius
    Nitarius April 19 2013 07: 46 New
    +9
    It is necessary to break the United States into the US! That's just our snot chewing politicians!
    And what "OUR" Humpbacks did, it would be worthwhile to do with the USA!
  8. Boot under the carpet
    Boot under the carpet April 19 2013 07: 54 New
    +4
    Quote: Tatarus
    And why wait? Annex the Baltic states, drop a couple of Pshekam planes to Warsaw. Ukraine, if it doesn’t calm down, divided.
    Ah and my bloodthirsty dreams ...
    But what to expect then? When again treacherously attacked.

    There will be no such scenario, there will be a screech all over the world!
    The United States will not be able to fight against Russia, firstly, China will not allow the West to capture the Far East, and secondly, the American contract army is not used to fighting with a less equipped army and incurring greater losses than with Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan.
    1. Atlon
      Atlon April 19 2013 08: 57 New
      +6
      Quote: Boot under the carpet
      US will not be able to fight against Russia

      The article is at least 20 years late. And I’m sorry for one western Wishlist, I’m sorry ... As for China, he will not fight with Russia either. Too high population density during a nuclear strike (and it will follow necessarily, because the number of warring parties is not comparable), the consequences will be catastrophic. Anyway, we needed to be taken in the 90s. With bare hands. Now - the train has left.
      1. krisostomus
        krisostomus April 19 2013 09: 56 New
        -11
        Well, the fact that they did not "take it with their bare hands" in the 90s, just speaks of the groundlessness of Russian propaganda for whipping up hatred in the "electorate" towards the US and NATO. Well, if we recall the Great Patriotic War, then the United States was not interested in the destruction of Russia even then, since in that case it would not have provided great assistance through Land Lease and practically free of charge.
        Well, as for China, why should it fight Russia at all? You can simply send 200 million Chinese to Siberia. China will not even notice such a "decline" in population. Who, then, to cover with a nuclear strike? Siberia?
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 19 2013 10: 06 New
          +1
          Quote: krisostomus
          since in that case they would not have provided tremendous assistance with landlysis and almost free of charge.

          Therefore, it was UNBREAKFULLY that we were parted for decades
          Quote: krisostomus
          You can just launch to Siberia, 200 million Chinese

          And who will let them go there.
          1. krisostomus
            krisostomus April 19 2013 11: 21 New
            -4
            Well, why are you fantasizing? The conditions of landlize were published and are well known: all delivered materials that were destroyed as a result of hostilities were not subject to payment. And of the cost of landlize, the USSR paid the United States about 1 percent.
            As for the Chinese, if the party orders, they will go and ask no one. And for 200 million Chinese, Russia in Siberia simply will not have enough "launchers", as well as cash cartridges.
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov April 19 2013 11: 27 New
              +3
              Quote: krisostomus
              Well, why are you fantasizing? The conditions of landlize were published and are well known: all delivered materials that were destroyed as a result of hostilities were not subject to payment. And of the cost of landlize, the USSR paid the United States about 1 percent.

              for you!!!

              Despite the fact that the war ended 67 years ago, and Lend-Lease deliveries ceased with it, we still have not paid the United States for military equipment and weapons, food and equipment, spare parts and fuels and lubricants ... The deadline for paying off our debt is 2030 year. How can this be? In fairness, we note that a prosperous Great Britain paid off its debt under Lend-Lease to the United States and Canada only on December 29, 2006.
            2. ultra
              ultra April 19 2013 15: 36 New
              +1
              Quote: krisostomus
              like cash cartridges.
              Deeply your delusion "dear"
        2. Atlon
          Atlon April 19 2013 12: 22 New
          0
          Quote: krisostomus
          since in that case they would not have provided tremendous assistance with landlysis and almost free of charge.

          Learn materiel! Namely, how much gold was taken out of the USSR for this "free" aid. Well, how many loans were discharged ...
          1. krisostomus
            krisostomus April 19 2013 15: 45 New
            0
            Well, with the materiel, things are very simple: the USSR paid for gold only with deliveries on pre-lendis, that is, what was supplied from June to October 1, 1941, or about 1 billion dollars in 1941 prices.
            The total volume of the lend-lease of the USSR amounted to $ 11,3 billion in prices of that time, or $ 2008 billion in 138 prices. In total, the USSR agreed to pay 300 million under the lend-lease, instead of the 800 presented, but paid only 48, and then in 1973. Russia agreed to pay $ 2030 million by 674, except that the dollar exchange rate of 1941 and 2008 differ 15 times, how much will be by 2030 - only God knows. So count the "materiel".
          2. Corsair
            Corsair April 19 2013 21: 33 New
            0
            Quote: Atlon
            Learn materiel! Namely, how much gold was taken out of the USSR for this "free" aid. Well, how many loans were discharged ...
            For Lend-Lease, we paid off a hundredfold, and not only in gold, but also in raw materials everything that was accepted for payment, everything that the war-ravaged country could give. By the way, the states received in full from their other allies. But for the USSR, any help in critical initial the years of the Second World War was invaluable. And by the middle of the war, having restored the defense industry to an acceptable level, we became practically independent from "imports".
        3. Bigriver
          Bigriver April 19 2013 13: 26 New
          +2
          Quote: krisostomus
          ... Well, if you recall the Great Patriotic War, then the United States and then were not interested in the destruction of Russia ...

          No, they were not.
          But they were interested in weakening all countries located on the Eurasian continent, as well as Great Britain.

          Harry Truman, June 41st:
          “If we see that Germany wins, we must help Russia, and if Russia wins, we must help Germany. We must give them the opportunity to kill each other as much as possible, although I do not want to see Hitler’s victory under any conditions. ”
        4. ultra
          ultra April 19 2013 15: 34 New
          +1
          Quote: krisostomus
          Well, what they didn't "take with their bare hands" in the 90s, just speaks of the groundlessness of Russian propaganda
          In the 90s, in fact, they took, in each ministry there were "advisers", one production sharing agreement was worth what! Then a sharp turn while the "dear ones" came to their senses and the train "Russia" "tu-tu", drove off on its own road!
        5. ioann1
          ioann1 April 19 2013 18: 03 New
          +1
          krisostomus: Well, what they did not "take with their bare hands" in the 90s, just speaks of the groundlessness of Russian propaganda for whipping up hatred in the "electorate" towards the US and NATO. "(C)
          There is such a thing - the memory of the Russian soul. Propaganda has nothing to do with it. The Russian people know how to distinguish lies from truth and without any propaganda.
          And if Russia died in the Second World War, the next dead person would be the United States, so the United States helped the USSR ...
      2. Kaa
        Kaa April 19 2013 10: 06 New
        11
        Quote: Atlon
        in a nuclear strike (and it will follow necessarily, because the number of opposing parties is not comparable) the consequences will be catastrophic

        I am not sure about the obligatory nuclear strike. "Generals usually prepare for past wars" - "In 2005, the Tomsk branch of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks issued a patent to Irkutsk scientists for an invention" Method for controlling the displacement regime in fragments of seismically active tectonic faults " In the media, this patent was immediately called “a patent for tectonic weapons.” But it was developed to ensure seismic safety in places of megacities and environmentally hazardous facilities, on construction sites and in the design of critical construction projects. As she wrote in her work on tectonic weapons. , an engineer-researcher of rocket-space complexes Yulia Kobrinovich, the development of tectonic weapons in the United States and the USSR began almost simultaneously - from the mid-70s.However, there was practically no information about these projects in the open press.
        It is known only about the existing in the USSR the Mercury-18 program (NIRN2M 08614PK) - “the remote sensing technique for the earthquake source using weak seismic fields and the transfer of explosion energy”, and the Volcano program. As a tectonic weapon, any means that cause vibrations in the earth's crust can be used: explosions, vibrators specially installed in certain places, as well as pumping a large amount of liquid into a place of tectonic tension.
        The most powerful seismic vibrator “CVO-100 ″ in the world was built in 1999 at a research site near the city of Babushkin, on South Baikal. From now on, the “executor” does not deliver a nuclear strike against the enemy - it “only” undermines several nuclear charges practically “under its nose”. "Contractor" does not understand what he is doing. And after a while on the other side of the Earth ...
        The main thing is that we have "absolutely nothing to do with it." We conducted "peaceful nuclear tests." Peaceful atom in every home. We are not aggressors - we are very cunning.

        . All this "theory" has long been known to everyone. That is why the old "members of the nuclear club" are so "unevenly sitting on chairs" when it comes to nuclear testing. Therefore, Russia's unilateral moratorium on nuclear testing did not cause euphoria in the United States, but rather, plunged its scientists into fear. This did not mean that Russia is now “forever behind”, it meant the opposite — Russia already has everything it needs. I hope you remember our colossal research fleet. "White ships with black crews" of the USSR went all over the planet "studying the World Ocean". The meaning of lithospheric weapons was not at all the complexity of the weapon itself. The main thing in lithospheric weapons is “how and where?”. The point is not at all about the warhead, but about where and how to lay it. “How to bend so that it bursts in the right place,” is the question. However, purely “historically” America has “big problems” in this sense. The country itself is located on the one hand very well, and on the other (precisely the one we are talking about), extremely unfortunate (for them). We did not have to work hard to find “where and what”.
        The studies were practically curtailed when it was proved with a high degree of probability that no studies on this issue would be needed for the next 100-200 years. The available data is enough to decide the fate of almost half of the US territory (the most populated and the most critical)
        http://7696724.mobi/spravka-tektonicheskoe-oruzhie/#ixzz2Qt0dlovE
        1. Skavron
          Skavron April 19 2013 17: 22 New
          +2
          Kaa, the photo of the strait is cool ...
          Where did you dig such a one?
          1. Kaa
            Kaa April 19 2013 23: 31 New
            0
            Quote: Skavron
            Where did you dig such a one?

            A gift from the heirs of Kurchatov laughing
        2. stalkerwalker
          stalkerwalker April 19 2013 19: 57 New
          +4
          Quote: Kaa
          “How to bend so that it bursts in the right place” - this is the question

          Kla-a-a-sny SOMPROMAT !!!
      3. Kaa
        Kaa April 19 2013 12: 12 New
        +3
        Quote: Atlon
        As for China, it will not fight with Russia either.
        He has no time for war, he has completely different problems outlined: "The largest Chinese audit company ShineWing warns that the situation with the debts of regional administrations is “out of control” and may cause an even larger crisis than the collapse of the US housing market.ShineWing head Zhang Ke said the company stopped buying local government bonds because he was in doubt.
        “We conducted an audit of some government bonds and came to the conclusion that they are very unreliable, since the low solvency of state bodies casts doubt on their ability to service the costs of bonds. The situation may worsen, ”said Zhang Ke. The International Monetary Fund, a number of rating agencies and investment banks have already expressed concern about Chinese public debt. “The situation is already getting out of hand. The onset of the crisis has become very possible. But since the debt has now moved into the long term, the timing of its arrival remains uncertain. ”Said Zhang. The issue of government bonds by local administrations peaked in 2008, when Beijing eased the requirements for loans, which was dictated by the desire to stimulate the economy after the global financial crisis. The total amount borrowed by regions, cities, provinces and villages throughout China ranges from 10 to 20 trillion yuan ($ 1,6 trillion and $ 3,2 trillion, respectively), which is equivalent to 20-40% of the size of the economy. Last week, the international rating agency Fitch downgraded China's credit rating. Such a deterioration in the rating was the first since 1999. On Tuesday, the reputable agency Moody's lowered its rating on China's rating from “positive” to “stable”.
        Investment companies owned by regional authorities sold bonds worth 2013 billion yuan in the first quarter of 283, which is two times higher than the figures for the same period last year. Such an increase can be considered as a measure to stimulate the economy, but its growth unexpectedly slowed down, stopping at 7,7% in the first quarter of 2013. Zhang Ke also noted that many regional authorities have invested in projects from building squares to repairing roads, which are low-return investments, so officials used refinancing as a way to repay lenders. In his latest report to the National People's Congress, State Council ex-Prime Minister Wen Jiabao said that China intends to tighten control over the debts of provinces and municipalities. According to a Chinese securities magazine on March 8, referring to the head of the Banking Regulatory Commission, Chan Fulin, “The total amount of loans to local governments is currently about 9,3 trillion yuan, thereby increasing the debt by 2% in two years.” “Now the situation can be described as wonderful,” said Fred Hu, founder of Primavera Capital Group and former chairman of the Chinese branch of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., at a forum in Boao. “But what will happen over the next five, ten, twenty years? ” - asks Hu, adding that if the government ignores the debt problem of regional self-government bodies, China may expect a debt crisis.
        Источник - http://news.finance.ua/ru/~/1/0/all/2013/04/17/300512
  9. Mikhail Topor
    Mikhail Topor April 19 2013 07: 54 New
    +2
    Quote: Nitarius
    It is necessary to break the United States into the US!

    nobody needs to fall apart. while our geopolitical enemy retreats. relations with the liberated territories need to be developed. forces are not unlimited, you need to spend them on creation. And the United States will fall apart. After watching videos on YouTube about Detroid, doubts pass completely.
    1. ultra
      ultra April 19 2013 08: 47 New
      0
      Quote: Mikhail Topor
      . After watching videos on YouTube about Detroid, doubts pass completely.
      Unfortunately, about our cities, you can shoot a bunch of such videos, even in our not the poorest city in the country! hi
  10. nod739
    nod739 April 19 2013 08: 12 New
    +3
    yes, indeed, WHERE "about 20 million Chinese are already in Russia"?
    and the fact that they are looking through their fingers, who knows what Putin agreed on during the first meeting with Xi Jinping (I hope not a mistake), maybe just about being friends together against the staff.

    Usually the first trips of new leaders just show the intention to get closer

    And the Chinese, under the belly of an armada of ships and bases, are also not needed, but they need oil from Iran and the Russian Federation, peaceful coexistence and a stable market

    It is painful that the author exaggerates and twitches somewhere, although in the spirit of rights
    1. djon3volta
      djon3volta April 19 2013 08: 37 New
      0
      Quote: nod739
      It hurts the author to exaggerate and distort

      I’m noting that the visit of the Chinese leader to Moscow was at the highest level, with a parade and carpet. The president has the right to do such attention to foreign leaders only once during the service life. I also want to remind you that Putin paid China the same first visit abroad (the CIS not counting) after his election in 2012. This is a signal and a hint to overseas and Western observers. These trips indicate who they will primarily be friends with and develop relations with .China + Russia = friendship.
      1. stalkerwalker
        stalkerwalker April 19 2013 19: 59 New
        +3
        Quote: djon3volta
        only once during the service life. I also want to remind you that Putin paid the first visit abroad (CIS not counting) after his election to 2012 in China

        hi
  11. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa April 19 2013 08: 17 New
    +2
    A small, not very strong DPRK will go overboard trying to force the greats to reckon with themselves. On this wave, the nation rallies around the country's leadership. I am amazed: why our leaders silently swallow such "pearls". I.V. Stalin would have long ago used the enemy's talkativeness to rally the nation to fight an external threat.
  12. Zubr
    Zubr April 19 2013 08: 25 New
    +3
    Yes, the article is quite objective, but everything that is written here has already been chewed several hundred times.

    I’ll make one quote from the author:

    These and other similar NATO exercises potentially reduce the security of Russia on its western borders, and they should be interpreted, contrary to the opinion of representatives of the Institute of Political and Military Analysis, only as "preparing for aggression against our country."

    And I think so, these teachings are in our favor, ours will follow after them, at the same time they will see how they have everything organized, it will be a wonderful experience for ours. And I think so, there will be a lot of interesting things.

    Yes, in addition, even if hostilities begin against us, even if they deliver pinpoint strikes with ultra-precise weapons, and even if they achieve success in this, which I very much doubt, although our air defense systems are at the stage of rearmament, their losses will be very large and they cannot do without a ground operation, here there will already be a war of complete destruction. Here the question will be different, which state and nation will continue to exist and God forbid, that it does not come to thermonuclear and neutron ammunition. Either complete mutual annihilation will come, or we will make them "MOM DO NOT BURN" and I think our soldiers understand this perfectly well and civilians understand it perfectly, everyone will rise up, old and young. They do not have the main "HUMAN SOUL". And ordinary people will win this war, and not because of the usual, but in spite of.

    Sorry, maybe I didn’t blurt out something, I said what I see and hear.
    1. djon3volta
      djon3volta April 19 2013 10: 02 New
      -5
      NATO training is the same training that we conduct at home. Russia will never be the first to attack them, they will not attack first because they know what will happen to them. They are afraid of us, we are afraid of them. Somewhere NATO can fight, they don’t dare with Russia, they understand it, we understand it. although no one has canceled idiots like Sakashvili.
  13. Garrin
    Garrin April 19 2013 08: 42 New
    +4
    Or maybe it's time to neutralize the internal threat to territorial integrity? And before the borders were not aligned in our favor, now the shelves are being distributed to Norwegians. Gentlemen, the liberals will be worse than any external aggressor.
    1. Zubr
      Zubr April 19 2013 09: 00 New
      +2
      Quote: Garrin
      Or maybe it's time to neutralize the internal threat to territorial integrity? And before the borders were not aligned in our favor, now the shelves are being distributed to Norwegians. Gentlemen, the liberals will be worse than any external aggressor.


      Yes, it’s so clear that most of them have long been put to the wall, this should already be a bonus.
  14. individual
    individual April 19 2013 09: 05 New
    -1
    Russia is developing. Her successes cause envy and fear among neighbors. Not everything is so simple with NATO and its vassals. We need to pay more attention to our domestic policy and economic development. The country's resources should be directed not towards the arms race, but towards maintaining a reliable nuclear parity - a guarantee of the country's sovereignty. The country's budget must be directed to internal development. Creation of conditions for high-quality population growth, affordable housing, roads, infrastructure. Traveling around the world, people see how the life of the advanced countries is organized and the toughness of our being. The people will "vote with their feet" towards the developed countries, and the rest will degrade even longer. There will be nothing to defend, and not anyone.
    1. Garrin
      Garrin April 19 2013 09: 48 New
      +3
      Quote: individ
      The country's resources should not be directed to an arms race, but to maintaining reliable nuclear parity - guarantees of the country's sovereignty.

      "Who does not want to feed his army - will feed someone else's."
  15. krez-74
    krez-74 April 19 2013 10: 14 New
    +2
    Well, those who are on the verge of collapse will not be able to ruin Russia! The European Union will soon be snapped up due to the stratification of the countries included in it, and because of the influx of Muslims who will begin to squabble with the local population ... The US is also not in good shape, and they embittered too many against themselves. In Russia, clear and correct paths are visible, it is developing, strengthening and gradually closing (now it is necessary)!
  16. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil April 19 2013 11: 09 New
    0
    No one will ever dare to carry out a military operation a la "Barbarossa" against a country with nuclear weapons. Do you really think that NATO tank columns will cross the Russian border and rush to Moscow? and then suddenly a nuclear strike is struck directly at them and for sure half will die immediately and the other half will die later from radiation sickness, and then a global nuclear war of all against all will begin, and then a funny Fallout in the end. Do you really think that the Americans are ready to exchange a well-fed fat life to a damp underground bunker (if you're lucky)? Another question is that, personally, I have no confidence in our leadership, and I'm afraid that they, like the Polish leadership in 1939, will pack their things and rush to the Canadian border (or to the Romanian border like those the Poles), and the Russian people will be left alone with the aggressor.
  17. silver_roman
    silver_roman April 19 2013 11: 14 New
    +3
    The funny thing is that America is shouting about only one thing, slightly changing words in places, but leaving the main meaning: "Russia, why are you stopping us from destroying you? Why are you so stubbornly resisting our intervention in all areas?" And apparently, they really don't understand why we are trying so hard to survive.
    The only option in which WE ALL will survive is if we begin to think NOT ONLY ABOUT DEFENSE, as it always was, but also to make plans to DESTROY THE WEST IN WHOLE !!! Destruction is not important in what form. the main thing is that the current system, which probably took shape in the 19th century, should disappear. Britain and the United States must be destroyed in any way or their authority, the possibilities are reduced to such a level when the range of tasks they solve is reduced to domestic ones. The rest of the "members of the WEST" (and here not only NATO members) must cleanse themselves of this infection and get rid of all its preconditions. Otherwise, the role of the United States and Britain must be comprehended.

    Speaking absolutely, my opinion looks something like this: even the strongest substance, even the strongest person, EVEN THE STRONGEST STATE will lose (!) If it only resists external factors. these factors need to be ruled out. Otherwise, the end.
    ps sorry for pessimism, but otherwise it’s hard to express it all. Maybe it's a little one-sided. I will accept any criticism.
    1. Akatsubasa
      Akatsubasa April 19 2013 15: 54 New
      +2
      That's right, the best defense is an attack) And it is not so important which country we represent now. I still believe that the time will come when all the inhabitants of the former Soviet Union, who have not yet lost common sense, will have to unite by taking on a couple of ethnically close peoples of the East Slavic group and their states, well, maybe someone else, against several hegemons with global ambitions. And if we have friendly relations with the two of them, we don’t need to have any illusions, we need to remember the 41st year) Gunpowder should always be kept dry.
      1. silver_roman
        silver_roman April 19 2013 16: 56 New
        +1
        aha. 41st year and events that took place on Daman island. also very revealing .. we were attacked by those who now keep us as friends.
  18. Egoza
    Egoza April 19 2013 11: 42 New
    +3
    Actually, I’m wondering, what kind of army can the Baltic states put up for joint exercises? Or will it still be NATO exercises in the closest proximity to the Russian Federation?
    And yet - what is this strange name? "Steadfast Jazz-2013"?
    steadfast - faithful, faithful, (one of the translation options, most likely suitable), but at the same time jazz - in addition to jazz - 2); nonsense, nonsense, stupidity b) unconventional, unconventional. Oh, that English! How much can be invested in one word! And what did the NATO people mean when they called the exercises with the Baltic states?
    1. silver_roman
      silver_roman April 19 2013 12: 02 New
      +1
      Well, based on those translation options. which you have listed, then it is quite logical to fit "faithful, faithful" and "not stereotyped, unconventional." After all, it is not so traditional to rely on the military might of the Baltic states in the matter of military operations against the Russian Federation! and of course they are always dedicated to their cause: creating wars to please themselves!
    2. baltika-18
      baltika-18 April 19 2013 13: 15 New
      +1
      Quote: Egoza
      And what did the NATO people mean when they called the exercises with the Baltic states?

      Most likely that they are loyal guys and they order music (that is, politics) in the world.
  19. Goldkonstantin
    Goldkonstantin April 19 2013 11: 56 New
    +3
    The author’s thesis that NATO is now in very good and operational form amuses me! Anal there are already there! Their military budgets are already declining due to the crisis, while the WB of the RF is growing. Who said there are 20 millions of Chinese in Siberia? I have half of Siberia in my relatives, I didn’t see the Chinese there very much. The United States and the European Union themselves are on the edge. Some because of their exorbitantly inflated ambitions, the second glorify fag and other perversions. And the fact that they blather over the hillock on Russia, so it always has been. They are cute and fluffy only when their ass starts to bake.
    1. s.lekomtseff
      s.lekomtseff April 19 2013 21: 03 New
      -1
      And the 300 govnomes of Tsar Leonid at thermal saws do not tell you anything ?????
  20. Bigriver
    Bigriver April 19 2013 13: 11 New
    +1
    "According to unofficial data, approximately 20 million Chinese are already in Russia .." (so the author).

    According to unofficial data, you, the author, are dumb!
  21. individual
    individual April 19 2013 13: 27 New
    +3
    Having no other candidate for the leader in Russia besides Putin, you ask yourself the question of artificially creating his image / image /. Look at the contradictions. How is the chief privatizer Chubais allowed to financial flows, first by RAO UES, and now by the specially created "saw-cut Nano concern"? How liberals, the heroes of the country's collapse, Kudrin, Siluanov, Gref, and now Nabiulina, are allowed to manage the economy. Why measures are not taken against odious persons involved in theft and corruption. You can continue. Why is a flock of hungry embezzlers gathered around the state feeding trough? There are questions, there is no answer ...
  22. Schweik
    Schweik April 19 2013 15: 50 New
    +1
    Why measures are not taken to the odious individuals involved in theft and corruption.

    Obviously, a thief in power is sitting on a thief.
  23. Butchcassidy
    Butchcassidy April 19 2013 17: 04 New
    0
    some strange map of Russia in the photo ...
  24. stalkerwalker
    stalkerwalker April 19 2013 19: 46 New
    +4
    "... the bloc does not conduct any exercises that, in terms of scale and scenario, could be interpreted as preparation for aggression against our country" ...
    Just yesterday I "posted" on an article about "Russians":
    ... The United States, taking advantage of its remoteness from Eurasia, bordering only with TWO countries (with a predominantly Catholic population), has the ability to influence events in Russia indirectly and indirectly, using leverage through NATO, Islamist organizations and countries. It uses both financial instruments and the policy of "gunboat-aircraft carriers".
    The "Cuban crisis" somewhat cooled the ardor of the Amrykans.
    But today the "fifth column" is working for them in Russia, including the same NGOs, and not only in the Russian Federation.
    hi
  25. s.lekomtseff
    s.lekomtseff April 19 2013 21: 00 New
    0
    Quote: mogus
    these are the ones who have gotten themselves into perestroika. Arrogance and self-conceit and rushing, but in the inside @ "> <" @.
    One Azerbaijani tried to come to a showdown, from Irkutsk, for 700 km., But it was clearly explained to him that at the given moment he was at a specific address, the cell phone of the woman (his mistress), whose husband works in the FSB, is in the same apartment ... then they told how his poor fellow was shaking ...


    I can't say that about all the Azeris. The very best friend, an Azerbaijani (born in Russia), will die for Russia !!! A man of exceptional decency and honor. You would know how he cried that they didn’t take him into the army (but they took me). I also consider him “Russian” and there are a lot of such people, not as many as we would like of course.
  26. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa April 19 2013 21: 01 New
    +2
    Weak hit! _ it is a fact. So that we are not divided into pieces, you need to be strong.
    Why are weapons programs designed before the 2020 year? Some consider for a better and safer cut of the military budget. Military analysts consider this date to be the boundary of the decision to redistribute Siberian pantries.
    The Americans hope that by 2020 they will be able to achieve superiority over us, significantly increasing their combat potential (missile defense system, high-precision weapons, stealth technologies and new generations of equipment in aviation, in the navy and in the army, artificial intelligence of combat systems, etc.). And they will be able to deliver a disarming blow to the system of military-political management and the country's strategic nuclear forces. Using psi-weapons to break the will to resist the army, leadership and population of the country. After that, take measures to “optimize the management of the economy and territories” of the Russian Federation.
    To prevent this from happening, there is a constant struggle for equality of potentials, including the potentials of allies. Only this can really push the day "D". We are vitally interested in the successful modernization of the aircraft. This will not allow anyone to divide us into pieces.