Medvedev rules out introduction of foreign troops into Ukraine as part of security guarantees

21 680 115
Medvedev rules out introduction of foreign troops into Ukraine as part of security guarantees

There will be no foreign troops in Ukraine under any flag, Russia does not accept security guarantees in this form. This was stated by Dmitry Medvedev.

The Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council commented on Macron's statements on plans to introduce a military contingent to Ukraine on the X network, calling the Frenchman a "Gallic rooster." According to Medvedev, there will be no Western troops in Ukraine, either under the guise of "peacekeepers" or in the form of "deterrent forces." Russia clearly states that it is not satisfied with this format of security guarantees.



The brainless Gallic rooster can't give up the idea of sending troops to Ukraine. It's been clearly stated: no NATO peacekeepers. Russia will not accept such security guarantees. But the hoarse, pathetic bird continues to crow to prove that it is the king of the henhouse.

- wrote Medvedev.

Earlier, Macron said in an interview that Europe plans to deploy some kind of "deterrent force" in Ukraine as part of security guarantees. The core will be made up of European troops, but with US support.

Meanwhile, the head of the NATO Military Committee, Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, admitted after a meeting of NATO chiefs of staff that there is no decision on security guarantees and the possible deployment of troops in Ukraine, as well as no unified position on this issue. Half of the countries refuse to send their troops to Ukraine at all, while others directly say that they are afraid of a direct clash with Russia.
115 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 19+
    20 August 2025 20: 53
    DAM has found his place in life, it must be admitted, he is much better at trolling than ruling. The Gallic rooster is probably delighted with the definition.
    1. +7
      20 August 2025 21: 05
      Sometimes I'm stunned. What Putin should say, Medvedev says. Although after the squabble with Trump, Alaska happened...
      1. 11+
        20 August 2025 21: 11
        There will be no foreign troops in Ukraine under any flag, Russia does not accept security guarantees in this form
        It would be strange if the end of the SVO, one of the reasons for which was NATO's approach to our borders, resulted in these NATO countries deploying their military contingents in Ukraine, that is, becoming even closer to us... Well, that's complete absurdity... So, let them not even count on it...
        1. -12
          20 August 2025 21: 18
          What's strange? Russia doesn't say what guarantees it has! What guarantees does Russia have? Frozen accounts? Allowing foreign companies to access Russia's mineral resources? Well? Specifically! What guarantees? The EU is introducing its contingent to the outskirts! And? Russia's actions? Zakharova's deep concern? Well? Your word, comrade Mauser!
          1. 15+
            20 August 2025 21: 31
            And who will stop Russia from doing with this contingent of their "willing" people exactly the same way as they are now doing with the mercenary camps - covering them with "the same Iskanders" or going over them with the same "Oreshnik"...??? Are they not the same "doubters" as you...??? So let them stock up on diapers if they try to twitch...
            1. +1
              20 August 2025 21: 41
              Oh, oh, oh! Why did such patriotic friends allow our partners to bring so much weapons to the outskirts? Are they our corrupt military? Not corrupt? Where did they get so much money? Have you seen the criminal cases? Are these Russian patriots? Well! Justify the supply of weapons to NATO to the front line! Who is to blame for this? Or is it someone's merit?
              1. +5
                20 August 2025 21: 56
                Don't be so bitter... We also imported a lot of things... Well, the same North Koreans, for example, and some of their weapons... Or the same Iran UAVs... And somehow no one objected... It seems that we also have no reason to be the first to start a war with NATO... Here we need a very specific reason for this, which will give us an illegal (bypassing the UN) introduction of NATO "deterrence" forces into Ukraine... I am sure that the States will not get involved for the Europeans... Their own skin is always more important to them... So let's wait and see, and it is definitely not worth it to scream "Fire!!!" at the top of our lungs and sow panic (unless intentionally, of course...) ahead of time... Stalin himself shot alarmists... So we will live and see - time will tell...
                1. -8
                  20 August 2025 22: 07
                  And when did the Koreans come to us? When did Iran help us? Of course, they deserve a big thank you for that! But! Who is going to start a war against NATO? And who is NATO going to fight against? So, dear comrade, don't bury your head in the sand! And anyway! Are you sure that there is sand there and not concrete? NATO doesn't hide its head! And in the 90s, we buried our head very successfully for NATO! And? How did that help us?
              2. -1
                21 August 2025 01: 37
                Quote: North Caucasus
                so many weapons on the outskirts? Are they our corrupt military? Not corrupt? Where do they get so much money from? Have you seen the criminal cases? Are they Russian patriots?

                It's a pity that you get so many minuses for asking the right questions. They are mostly people who are patriotically minded. That is why the Ukrainian special services and their Western curators are allowed to commit terrorist attacks in Russia and eliminate intractable officers and generals, leaders of the DPR and LPR. And if they themselves cannot do it, then the Russian special services are always ready to help them, as was the case with Wagner. Neither Zelensky, nor any person from his entourage, let alone his Western masters, suffered or were held accountable for the terrorist attacks. And they stole no less money than Moscow officials. It is not for nothing that they say, one man's war is another man's mother.
            2. -4
              20 August 2025 22: 01
              Well, in Syria, nothing from us flew through NATO bases.
            3. +1
              21 August 2025 07: 28
              If a mandate from some organizations is agreed upon, it will be problematic to just go and strike; it will be the same as if you were to strike the territory from which they came.
              I hope it won't come to that and it will never happen. Their impudence meter is directly proportional to our complacency in some matters.
          2. -3
            20 August 2025 21: 33
            Quote: North Caucasus
            ? Here the EU is introducing its contingent to the outskirts! And? Russia's actions? Zakharova's deep concern? Well? Your word, comrade Mauser!

            Why a Mauser? When the Iskander has already flown in more than once for tourists from the EU. How do you like these guarantees? In Ukraine, only Russia can give any guarantees.
            1. -3
              20 August 2025 21: 46
              Somehow the Iskanders and Oreshniks are not flying in very well! They are not impressing our dear partners! While our partners are setting conditions for the Russian Federation! What conditions did the Russian Federation set for the EU? Zakharova's statements? If the Russian Federation set conditions, then! Question! Why is the Russian Federation flying in? No conditions were set? Conditions are not being met? They are not being met because they don't give a damn about the Russian Federation? Your answer!
              1. -4
                20 August 2025 21: 50
                These are all words and lies! Where are the actions? Where are their troops in Ukraine?
                1. +1
                  20 August 2025 21: 58
                  Were there mercenaries? Were there! Were there deliveries of Javelins and Abrams? Were there! Are they actually active! And Russia? Weapons deliveries are a legitimate goal of the Russian army! And? Why did it all reach the front? Where are Russia's actions? Doesn't Russia know where the decision-making centers are? What happened to Macron? And to other EU politicians? No way! What are you talking about? Where are Russia's red lines? On Rublyovka? Nothing has happened there! So what!? Where are Russia's actions? Maybe we can come to an agreement, boss? Are these Russia's actions? Well? Where exactly have we cornered and who have we cornered? All talk and no action! The reason? Are we scared? Why? Money and children abroad!? And what if the children were at the front? Then what? Were we scared too? Or did we hack them to pieces?
                  1. -5
                    20 August 2025 22: 07
                    Quote: North Caucasus
                    And Russia? Weapons supplies are a legitimate goal of the Russian army! And? Why did it all reach the front?

                    How do you even know anything? You claim it! After all, Kyiv keeps everything secret. laughing Their warehouses are constantly being covered, repeated detonations are taking place, and you still ask questions! What, is your memory bad or are you trolling?
                    Quote: North Caucasus
                    Were there mercenaries? Were there!

                    That's exactly what happened! And there were reports that their deployments were covered by Iskanders and Geraniums. Don't you remember either, troll?
                  2. +3
                    20 August 2025 22: 13
                    Quote: North Caucasus
                    Were there mercenaries? Were there!

                    So what? Most of them are already in the coffin, and they will bury these too if they try
                    1. -7
                      20 August 2025 22: 18
                      In the coffin, these are fingers! What if I cut off your fingers? Will you die? And what if I cut off your head? Will you be healthier? Same here! They don't cut off heads! Question! Why?
                      1. +4
                        20 August 2025 23: 30
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        In the coffin, these are fingers! What if I cut off your fingers? Will you die? And what if I cut off your head? Will you be healthier? Same here! They don't cut off heads! Question! Why?

                        so the heads are still declaring that these are not their fingers, or the extreme ones themselves
                  3. -4
                    20 August 2025 22: 17
                    Quote: North Caucasus
                    What happened to Macron? And to other EU politicians?

                    Macron is the president of a country that has nuclear weapons, and this would be an act of aggression and could start a nuclear war.
                    1. -5
                      20 August 2025 22: 22
                      Russia also has nuclear weapons! And? Where is the nuclear war against Russia? Maybe the trick is in something else? In the dough? How much dough does France keep in Russia? And Germany? And the USA? Well? What's the conclusion? Whoever has the dough is the commander!
                      1. -1
                        20 August 2025 22: 24
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Russia also has nuclear weapons! And?

                        And we have already taken Crimea and Donbass! Can't you think about anything else except money?
                      2. -4
                        20 August 2025 22: 31
                        And what is our government thinking about? Not about money? Why did so many oligarchs go to Alaska? Not priests! Oligarchs! What agreements are we making? In money? What did we offer Trump? Faith? Business! Zelensky offered Trump one hole in the ground, and we offered 33! What else can we offer Trump? High technology? What kind? In fast and high-quality road construction? Aircraft manufacturing? Automotive industry? Well? What technologies do we have that the US doesn't? Hypersonics? And what results has it achieved? Stop trying to fit an owl onto a globe!
                      3. -3
                        20 August 2025 22: 34
                        Caucasus, start right away with the history of perestroika! Have I explained to you specifically that you are starting to go astray?
                      4. -7
                        20 August 2025 22: 35
                        I also answered you specifically! What's not clear?
                      5. -5
                        20 August 2025 22: 37
                        Quote: Vladislav_V
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Russia also has nuclear weapons! And?

                        And we have already taken Crimea and Donbass!

                        What else do you want? What are you talking about and throwing in an off-topic manner? Shell-shocked?
                      6. -5
                        20 August 2025 22: 38
                        Everything is on topic for me! Where are you heading?
                      7. -5
                        20 August 2025 22: 41
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Everything is on topic for me! Where are you heading?

                        I answered you specifically about nuclear weapons! Fairstein?
                      8. -6
                        20 August 2025 22: 43
                        I also gave you a specific answer about nuclear weapons! What's not clear?
                      9. -4
                        20 August 2025 22: 48
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        What is not clear?

                        But it’s not clear how money, faith, the auto industry, aircraft manufacturing, business, and roads relate to nuclear weapons? laughing Just watch out, you'll burn out at work alone. hi
                      10. -7
                        20 August 2025 22: 57
                        Wow, brother, how are you going! Tell me. Is the Russian Federation a nuclear country or not? Nuclear? And why is there such aggression against it? Does that mean the Russian Federation is not nuclear? Where is the respect and admiration for a nuclear country here? Why are weapons and mercenaries going against the Russian Federation? Why are there sanctions against the Russian Federation? Because the Russian Federation does not have nuclear weapons? Well! What are the arguments for and against?
                      11. -5
                        21 August 2025 07: 16
                        It's a proxy war, brother, waged between two nuclear powers through a third party. Read it sometime in your spare time, they write about very serious topics there.
                        Strategic Deterrence: New Contours
                        Nuclear deterrence and other ways to keep the peace
                        #4 2024 July/August
                        https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/sderzhivanie-trenin/
                      12. 0
                        25 August 2025 08: 17
                        Quote: Vladislav_V
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Russia also has nuclear weapons! And?

                        And we have already taken Crimea and Donbass! Can't you think about anything else except money?

                        Hi, I put a plus, but we haven't taken Donbass yet, don't get ahead of the game
                2. +2
                  20 August 2025 22: 14
                  Quote: Vladislav_V
                  Where are their troops in Ukraine?

                  Officially, there is no regular army there, but we know who all these mercenaries really are.
                  1. -1
                    20 August 2025 22: 20
                    Quote: guest
                    Officially, they don't have a regular army there.

                    Iskander doesn't care if they are there officially or not. "And there it's not by passport, there they hit you in the face."
              2. -1
                21 August 2025 04: 35
                It's funny to watch you twist
          3. +1
            21 August 2025 19: 28
            Here the EU is introducing its contingent to the outskirts! And? Russia's actions?


            Bomb without sorting!
            1. 0
              21 August 2025 23: 25
              Bomb without sorting!
              Support!
        2. 0
          20 August 2025 22: 06
          Is that the very hand of the Kremlin in the picture? laughing lol
        3. +4
          21 August 2025 06: 42
          They have already advanced as far as possible, Finland has joined, years and decades will pass and Ukraine will join under some pretext.
          1. 0
            25 August 2025 08: 20
            Quote from ARIONkrsk
            They have already advanced as far as possible, Finland has joined, years and decades will pass and Ukraine will join under some pretext.

            you are right It turns out Finland violated the peace treaty of 1944 in theory we should declare war on it but now is not the time to wave a mace left and right (well, not a mace but a sword, otherwise they will think about ICBMs)
            Until yesterday I was racking my brains over why Finland got off so easy in the war of 1941-1945. It turns out that the peace treaty had a lot of things written down about what Finland had to do and what it had not to do.
      2. +1
        20 August 2025 21: 15
        After the spat with Macron, a French Brest could happen; in good weather, England can be seen from it.
        1. +2
          20 August 2025 22: 24
          It's almost 200 km from Brest in France to England. You can't see it with a telescope.
          1. +1
            20 August 2025 23: 18
            Sorry, I was wrong, I relied on my memory.
      3. 0
        20 August 2025 21: 25
        Quote: ser-pov
        Sometimes I'm shocked. What Putin should say, Medvedev says.

        What the president cannot say openly in such a form, the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council can very well say!
      4. -6
        20 August 2025 21: 52
        If Putin said something like that, it would be a Spanish shame. Or are you a fan of the AUE culture?
        1. +4
          20 August 2025 22: 07
          Are you one of those who liked it when my Russian President "self-propelled Joe" called him a butcher and a murderer?
          1. +1
            21 August 2025 05: 57
            Quote: tralflot1832
            Are you one of those who liked it when my Russian President "self-propelled Joe" called him a butcher and a murderer?

            If you have to talk to an idiot, you don't have to become one yourself.
          2. -1
            21 August 2025 07: 26
            "Self-propelled Joe" I understand you mean Biden, he served out his presidential term and did not plan to continue his career, he also has age-related changes, so he could not particularly watch his words. But what about Medvedev?
        2. 0
          21 August 2025 09: 06
          Quote: Kirill 59
          If Putin said something like that, it would be a Spanish shame.

          I support you. Plus to you.
      5. +1
        21 August 2025 01: 25
        ser-pov
        Yesterday, 21: 05
        Sometimes I'm stunned. What Putin should say, Medvedev says. Although after the squabble with Trump, Alaska happened...

        hi Staff culture doesn't allow it, sir!
        In international politics and diplomacy, there are areas and topics that are more easily and clearly explained by subordinates, and the Tsar's silence means that the courtiers are hitting the mark. am
      6. +1
        21 August 2025 05: 55
        Quote: ser-pov
        Sometimes I'm shocked. What Putin should say, Medvedev says.

        That's probably why you're not a president, especially of Russia. Foreign policy is not a bazaar showdown between sunflower seed traders, although some Western leaders and their followers strive for it. Our President is a well-mannered person and tries not to attack his opponents personally. Indirect explanations (through other people) are used to make his thoughts clear. Everyone (who is supposed to) understands that these are Putin's thoughts, but no one will be able to pin primitive, everyday rudeness on him. It's strange that you don't understand this...
      7. 0
        21 August 2025 09: 05
        Quote: ser-pov
        Sometimes I'm shocked. What Putin should say, Medvedev says.

        Putin should insult the president of another country? A well-mannered and self-respecting person would not stoop to such a thing
    2. 0
      21 August 2025 01: 22
      Quote: Word
      He's much better at trolling than at editing

      Maybe then it is worth comparing the results of the 5-day war with Georgia and the long-term summer war with Ukraine. Then Saakashvili chewed his tie, and then went to prison. Now the expired Zelensky is a king with an indulgence for crimes and guarantees of personal safety.
      DAM and VVP, although they are in the same party, have very different approaches.
      1. +1
        21 August 2025 02: 05
        There is some truth in your words, but still, during that rocker switch, all the ministers coordinated the DAM’s commands with the VVP, which infuriated him; I remember such an incident was shown on TV.
  2. 12+
    20 August 2025 20: 55
    Dmitry Anatolyevich, as always, called everything by its proper name, without embarrassment. I fully support hi
    1. -4
      20 August 2025 21: 20
      Well, the statements of the DAM are of course very patriotic! But!? What has been done? Here is the catch! How did Russia respond to NATO?
      1. +7
        20 August 2025 21: 32
        Russia ignored the demand of NATO in the person of Macron, a cessation of hostilities and a meeting between President Putin and the illegitimate one. NATO could have introduced troops yesterday, we are waiting. More precisely, they were supposed to introduce them on February 25, 2022. During this time, they only introduce presidents and prime ministers in the "circulation of former ones," and NATO troops do not move from their borders.
        1. 0
          20 August 2025 21: 48
          Quote: tralflot1832
          Russia ignored NATO's demand, represented by Macron, to stop hostilities and hold a meeting between President Putin and the illegitimate

          The usual chatter to somehow support Zelensky.
      2. +4
        20 August 2025 21: 55
        How did Russia respond to NATO?

        Well, according to the most, most modest estimates, more than 6000 mercenaries from 110 countries, including NATO countries, lost their lives on the outskirts. The record there belongs to Georgia and Poland. And most likely, many times more.
        1. -8
          20 August 2025 22: 01

          Well, according to the most, most modest estimates, more than 6000 mercenaries from 110 countries, including NATO countries, lost their lives on the outskirts. The record there belongs to Georgia and Poland.
          This is of course good! There will be less nastiness left! But these are blows to the tail! Who was hit on the head? Or is there an agreement not to hit on the head?
          1. +5
            20 August 2025 22: 03
            Quote: North Caucasus
            But these are blows to the tails! Who was hit on the head?

            Have you ever been hit on the tail? If not, I don't recommend trying it, it's very unpleasant. And the head can't hurt, it's a bone (c).
            1. -10
              20 August 2025 22: 09
              Judging by the reaction of the EU and the US, blows to the tail are all in the air! The main thing is that there are no blows to the head! And no one has ever been hit in the head!
              1. +7
                20 August 2025 22: 13
                Quote: North Caucasus
                Judging by the reaction of the EU and the US, the blows to the tail are all in vain

                Well, I don't know. There is a proverb:

                If it doesn't go through your head, it will go through your butt.

                And there is a tail next to where the butt is what
          2. +3
            20 August 2025 22: 06
            A blow to the "head", if you mean the leaders of NATO member countries, according to generally accepted international rules means declaring war on that country, with all the consequences... But there are no heads on the outskirts, there are pots there, and it is useless to hit them, it is easier to grind everyone on the front line, there are no European screams...
            1. -11
              20 August 2025 22: 14
              And isn't the supply of weapons to the outskirts a declaration of war on Russia? What strange international laws! They can! Russia is forbidden! Maybe it's time to change the rules of the game? Either we play by their rules, or they play by ours! Are we losers? Equal? Dominant? Who are we? If we set the rules, we dominate! If we obey, then our place is in the latrine! There is no other way!
              1. +2
                20 August 2025 22: 17
                But isn't the supply of weapons to the outskirts a declaration of war on Russia?

                Russia also supplies weapons to Africa, the former colonies of the homeland of the Gallic rooster, and nothing, no one yelps, everyone swallows and wipes their mouths...
                1. -10
                  20 August 2025 22: 25
                  That's the whole point of politics! You shouldn't knock on the door before you enter it! You should kick it open!
                  1. +5
                    20 August 2025 22: 31
                    Quote: North Caucasus
                    You shouldn't knock on the door before entering it! You should open it with a kick!

                    Try to do this in life. You will not live long, but badly. I guarantee it. Yes
                    1. -8
                      20 August 2025 22: 34
                      Tell that to the US! They are not in poverty! But many people pray to them! Azerbaijan, for example! And Armenia doesn't spit on the US! And what about the Balts? Have they vomited on the US?
                      1. +2
                        20 August 2025 22: 35
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        You tell this to the USA

                        No, I'd rather tell you this. Try it in practice, then share your impressions. Well, if you live long enough, of course.

                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Azerbaijan for example

                        A good example. The Russian Federation is now pinching the rhinoceros, so much so that it squeaks. And how did he breathe? laughing
                      2. -11
                        20 August 2025 22: 37
                        As for the squeak, that's still a question! Baku has taken away the transport route! And what did Russia do to counter this? The Russian Federation has lost a lot in terms of routes! Greetings to MSG and EBN!
                      3. +4
                        20 August 2025 22: 38
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Hello MSG and EBN

                        I can't. I'm still in this world, not the next. You guys will have to manage somehow there. laughing
                      4. -10
                        20 August 2025 22: 42
                        But we are the ones paying the price for their policies! And there is no sign of moving away from this policy! Still the same worship of the West! What will they say about us? What will they think about us? Maybe it is time to think about what our own population thinks and says about the leadership? Do we have educational state programs on TV? Where do people from the government apparatus educate the population?
                      5. +4
                        20 August 2025 22: 47
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        But we are the ones paying for their policies.

                        Speak for yourself when you say such nonsense. I certainly don't have to pay for it.

                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Still the same worship of the West

                        Oha. Europe is sent to the forest, Trump, in order to call Putin, breaks off negotiations with them... what kind of worship to the crows? Wake up, you are enchanted...

                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        What will they think of us?

                        And there are... a lot of us. laughing

                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Maybe it's time to think about what the population thinks and says about the leadership?

                        The question is who exactly to listen to, from the inhabitants. For example, even I, accustomed to everything, can hardly stand you... Yes

                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Do we have educational government programs on TV?

                        I don't know, I don't have a TV. Since the forgotten year 2010.

                        Still have questions? laughing
                      6. -9
                        20 August 2025 22: 53
                        Why should I speak for myself if I am not a separate country? Who sent Europe? We all somehow want the lifting of sanctions and the sale of raw materials there! Are there many of us? Well, thanks to the efforts of the leadership, it seems we are successfully shrinking. The question is to what level? No need to move me! For now I move myself! I don’t watch TV either. What kind of nonsense are these TV programs!
                      7. +4
                        20 August 2025 22: 56
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Why should I speak for myself if I am not a separate country?

                        Because speaking for me, I forgot to write out the rights for you.

                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Who sent Europe?

                        He said already: forest.

                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Are there many of us?

                        We are a f*ck! (c)

                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        There is no need to move me!

                        Ok I will not laughing

                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        What kind of nonsense is this?

                        Self-criticism is a sign of growth Yes
                      8. -8
                        20 August 2025 23: 02
                        Well then, oh! If they didn't give me the rights! Can I express my personal opinion? Or will I be executed for five years for this? But the EU has sent the Russian Federation nowhere! Who and against whom have we imposed sanctions? Has the EU banned the purchase of our KamAZs? Or has the EU banned the purchase of their Mercedes? And what about aviation? How many planes and helicopters has the EU purchased from the Russian Federation?
                      9. +5
                        20 August 2025 23: 05
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        Can I express my personal opinion?

                        For yourself - always please. For everyone - it's not worth it, even if someone from everyone else doesn't understand the speaker.

                        And anyway, you said it yourself:

                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        There is no need to move me!

                        That's it, I can't stand you anymore. Go away, pratic. stop laughing hi
                      10. -7
                        20 August 2025 23: 06
                        An immodest question! What is my disgust?
                      11. +3
                        20 August 2025 23: 07
                        Quote: North Caucasus
                        What is my disgust?

                        Hop, I'll correct you: go away, you're inappropriate.

                        I already said goodbye to you, in case you didn't notice.
                      12. -9
                        20 August 2025 23: 08
                        Well then, until next time! I'm not leaving the pages of VO!
              2. +1
                21 August 2025 07: 48
                Lots of emotions from you and just as many questions, I read your comments. Each next one, a bunch of questions, little content, lots of emotions. Question marks alternate with exclamation marks. Did something happen to you?
  3. +5
    20 August 2025 21: 04
    I'm sure the British will print in their media - Medvedev D.A. called the President of France "an earthworm", ugh "the Gallic Rooster". President Macron demands an explanation of whether this is praise or a laudatory curse. Just don't tell Macron's wife "Panin". There will be a scandal.
    1. -10
      20 August 2025 21: 23
      The question here is different! What has been declared and what has been done! Our actions against France, the EU and the US? Well? We haven't even sneezed or farted? So what? What's the point of declarations without action? What's the outcome?
    2. -2
      21 August 2025 02: 29
      Quote: tralflot1832
      I'm sure the British will print in their media - Medvedev D.A. called the President of France "an earthworm", ugh "the Galician Rooster".

      It's worth knowing about the symbol of France, the English are obviously aware. However, I'm almost sure that you are aware too. That is, your prediction will not come true
  4. +2
    20 August 2025 21: 08
    Macron has nothing to lose, his wife is a baba-grandfather.
  5. +3
    20 August 2025 21: 12
    Considering Macaron's sexual orientation, the hint was more than ambiguous. wassat
    1. +2
      20 August 2025 21: 41
      Macron took Medvedev's words as praise, I am a "Gallic eagle, ugh rooster." Now he is calling Merz, and the Galician rooster is cooler than the Hamburg rooster (a naval curse, but the meaning is the same)
    2. -1
      20 August 2025 22: 53
      Quote: Eugen 62
      the hint turned out to be more than ambiguous.

      Well, Gallic and Hamburg are not the same thing, in theory, although now...
    3. -2
      21 August 2025 02: 30
      No one except the former USSR will understand this hint.
  6. +1
    20 August 2025 21: 13
    Putin immediately said, clearly and understandably, we will glass those who stick their noses in.
    No one dares not to trust Putin anymore.
  7. K_4
    -1
    20 August 2025 21: 16
    Yes, he is normal, although yes, they shut him up at the time with this "hang in there", completely taken out of context. Apparently he started to score points too much, and his boss doesn't like that. During his presidency, yes, he screwed up here and there, and in some places, on the contrary: he rolled rodents without sentimentality, saving light bulbs... that's funny, but thanks to them, we really were probably the first in the world to switch to their mass consumption. And the years of his rule are probably the calmest and most stable, with growth... a sort of Brezhnev of modern times.
  8. -1
    20 August 2025 21: 20
    We'll soon find out what will happen, and talkers can talk a lot.
  9. +6
    20 August 2025 21: 28
    Medvedev is Putin's opinion voiced in an undiplomatic manner.
    Although, after Ambassador Melnik, the word “diplomacy” itself can be renamed “matiya”.
    The fact is right there in front of you, Europeds!
    1. +3
      20 August 2025 21: 51
      They are used to Scholz - liver sausage, Macron - Gallic rooster.
  10. +4
    20 August 2025 22: 01
    But the hoarse, pathetic bird continues to crow to prove that it is the king of the henhouse.

    - wrote Medvedev.
    And how right he is, a pathetic chicken wants to become the king of the chicken coop.
    1. 0
      21 August 2025 01: 55
      And also the neighboring chicken coops.
  11. +3
    20 August 2025 22: 03
    This is already a classic from Dmitry Anatolyevich: Liz Truss is a "thermonuclear Russophobe", Borrell is a "short-sighted commissar", Johnson is a "freak guy":. And if you open a business, a portrait of a European politician on a T-shirt and a quote from Dmitry Anatolyevich, as he called it. It should "work".
  12. +2
    20 August 2025 22: 05
    The Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council commented on Macron's statements on plans to introduce a military contingent to Ukraine on the X network, calling the Frenchman a "Gallic rooster."

    And why was it necessary to insult the rooster by comparing him to Macron. laughing lol
    1. +3
      20 August 2025 22: 33
      He didn't insult anyone. Neither the rooster nor Macron. He simply stated a fact.
      The Gallic rooster (French: le coq gaulois) is one of the allegorical names of France. Symbol of France.
      Gauls was the name given by the ancient Romans to the Celts who inhabited Gaul, the territory of modern France, Belgium and Northern Italy. The Latin word "gallus" means not only "gaul" but also "rooster". The French scientist Adolphe Bloch explained that the Romans gave this name to the Celts because they were all red-haired and their fiery red crests resembled cockscombs.

      During the French Revolution of the 1791th century, a competition was announced for a design for a new coin. After Augustin Dupré proposed minting the genius of France writing on an altar, the members of the committee advised adding a rooster, an emblem of vigilance, to one side of the altar, according to the report of the jury of the XNUMX competition. Dupré's design with the added rooster was used to mint the twenty-franc coin. The rooster depicted on the coins was interpreted by the French, who considered the Gauls to be their ancestors, as the "Gallic rooster" and began to consider it their national emblem.
      1. -1
        20 August 2025 22: 47
        Quote from: DirtyLiar
        He didn't insult anyone.

        I have emoticons at the end, which means you shouldn't take it so seriously.
        1. +4
          20 August 2025 22: 53
          Well, yes, and I, naturally, thought that you stood up for the rights of roosters and were going to file a complaint with the UN against Dmitry Anatolyevich in connection with the “insult to the honor and dignity” of birds.
          But seriously, your comment simply begged for a quote with historical facts. Maybe people will read it and understand that D.A.M. is not writing this simply out of a desire to insult. Well, France has such a symbol, why not use it?
          1. -1
            21 August 2025 02: 06
            That's right. The rooster is a brave, cocky bird and will fight to the death. But it's not particularly smart. Like, feebleminded and brave.
            Who knows how much the French are like their symbol now. After the Crimean War, they were ditching almost everything.
  13. -5
    20 August 2025 23: 31
    Lavrov today at a meeting with the head of the Jordanian Foreign Ministry said that he does not rule out the possibility that the British, French, Americans and Chinese would be security guarantors.
    1. -1
      20 August 2025 23: 37
      Quote from MaxKruh
      The guarantors of security were the British, the French, the Americans and the Chinese...

      ... and also Martians.

      If the diplomat says yes, then it may be.
      If the diplomat says “maybe,” then it is “no.”
      And if a diplomat says no, then this is no longer a diplomat.
    2. 0
      21 August 2025 07: 47
      It would be best to replace them all with one company of brave Estonians!
  14. +1
    20 August 2025 23: 53
    Russia should not legitimize NATO's eastern flank. NATO has legal problems from the Oder to the other side.
  15. +2
    21 August 2025 01: 04
    I trolled the "rooster" DAM very specifically. In fact, that's how it is. I hope the "rooster" won't lead his submarines into battle)) laughing
    The Gallic rooster can't give up on the idea of sending troops to Ukraine. It's been made clear: no NATO peacekeepers. Russia won't accept such security guarantees. But the hoarse, pathetic bird keeps crowing to prove that it's the king of the henhouse.

    - wrote Medvedev.
  16. -1
    21 August 2025 02: 37
    Quote: from AiFs with abbreviations
    American Journalist Candace Owens stated:

    "We are losing Western civilization because straight men are constantly forced to follow and choose gay men. Patriarchy has been replaced by gay triarchy. From Macron to Trudeau, from Zelensky to Obama, we are literally inundated with theater boys leading countries and movements."
    She also called on people not to believe in the theatrical speeches of these politicians, and even more so – not to die for them.
    Recall that Owens previously stated that the first lady of France, Brigitte Macron, was born a man.
    1. +3
      21 August 2025 06: 50
      No one will hear the squeak of a lonely mosquito in the cacophony of tens of thousands of frogs in the swamp!
  17. -1
    21 August 2025 07: 43
    - It is clearly stated: no NATO peacekeepers. Russia will not accept such security guarantees. But the hoarse, pathetic bird continues to crow to prove that it is the king of the henhouse.

    - wrote Medvedev.-
    ----------
    -However! Medvedev is not a reader, he is a Writer!..-
  18. 0
    21 August 2025 08: 30
    United Russia
    Hmm, in English who is this for?
  19. +1
    21 August 2025 11: 31
    Medvedev rules out introduction of foreign troops into Ukraine as part of security guarantees

    The troops of the willing (Gallic cock, Englishwoman, etc.) would be best brought into the US to guarantee Trump's safety.
  20. 0
    21 August 2025 19: 32
    Proposal.
    Raise the level of Ukraine-Russia negotiations. Appoint D.A. Medvedev as the head of the Russian team??? !