Counter-drone terror: countering kamikaze UAVs launched by the enemy from Russian territory

18 197 85
Counter-drone terror: countering kamikaze UAVs launched by the enemy from Russian territory

Recently, the number of cases of attacks by Ukrainian kamikaze unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) on objects located in the rear areas of the Russian Federation has increased significantly. However, for the benefit of those who are “doomed to die,” it should be noted that the number of strikes carried out by the Russian Armed Forces on objects located throughout the territory of Ukraine has increased even more.

However, the problem exists and will remain relevant not only during the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, but also after its completion, since Faceless wars and drone terror are the new reality we will have to learn to live with.



There are two ways for the enemy to launch kamikaze UAV strikes deep into our territory.

The first is the use of long-range kamikaze UAVs. Examples of such UAVs are the kamikaze UAVs "Bober", "Lyuty", E-300 Enterprise and others. The flight range of such UAVs can be hundreds and even thousands of kilometers, but, theoretically, they can be detected and intercepted by air defense systems (Defense) along the entire flight route. We previously discussed counteraction to long-range kamikaze UAVs in the article Deployment of T-PVO – territorial air defense forces of the Russian Federation.


Ukrainian long-range kamikaze UAV An-196 "Lyuty"

The second is the launch of relatively compact kamikaze UAVs of the aircraft and copter (quadcopter/octacopter/hexacopter) type by Ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance groups (DRG) directly from Russian territory.

For a long time, many denied this possibility altogether, although information periodically appeared in open sources about Gazelles, from which unknown persons launched aircraft-type UAVs from a short stop. There was (and is) no information on this matter in official sources.

However, after the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) and the Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR) carried out the special operation “Web”, aimed at damaging the Russian strategic aviation With the help of kamikaze UAVs launched from hidden compartments located in the back of trucks, it became impossible to deny reality.


Placement drones in a container, in the back of a truck, during the Ukrainian operation "Web"

It is characteristic that later Israel used similar tactics to destroy air defense systems, nuclear scientists and the command staff of the Iranian armed forces. It is not known whether one of them borrowed the idea from someone else, or whether the Ukrainian and Israeli special services had common advisers, but such coincidences are hard to believe.

The problem with drone terrorism is that, as we have already said above, it will never end, at least in the foreseeable future. There will be no Ukraine, there will still be the same Turkey and Azerbaijan, perhaps they will be afraid to wage an open war against us, but they can very well organize terror with the help of radical Islamic groups led by the same Great Britain.

Regardless of who taught whom what, Russia will have to fight new challenges, and it is necessary today (or even yesterday) to think about measures to systematically counter enemy kamikaze UAVs launched from the territory of the Russian Federation.

Presumably, systemic counteraction to drone terrorism will include the following stages:
- search for media;
- counter-guidance;
- interception;
- increasing the security of objects.

Today we will talk about the advance search for kamikaze UAV carriers, that is, about measures to prevent their launch, in fact, a preemptive war.

Classification


Drones launched by the enemy from Russian territory can be divided into two groups.

The first group is small and ultra-small kamikaze UAVs of the quadcopter type, for example, FPV drones, with a flight range of several tens of kilometers and a warhead weighing about one to two kilograms, although kamikaze UAVs of the aircraft type can also be of such dimensions.

The main difference of small UAVs is that they are practically impossible to detect during transportation - they can be hidden in a backpack, under a car seat or in a spare tire compartment, of course, we are not talking about carrying them to an airport or a train station, but Ukrainian saboteurs, as practice shows, are not complete idiots?

Of course, this is true only when transporting individual UAVs – when organizing massive attacks even with small-sized kamikaze UAVs, the enemy will need vehicles of the appropriate size and carrying capacity.

The second group is medium-sized kamikaze UAVs of the aircraft type, with a flight range of several hundred kilometers and a warhead weighing several tens of kilograms. To transport such kamikaze UAVs, a truck, SUV or pickup with a fairly large cargo compartment will be required.


The AQ 400 Scythe kamikaze drone can be hidden in a truck

Based on the above, the search for carriers of individual small UAVs can be carried out relatively effectively only after their launch, whereas carriers of a large number of small-sized and any number of medium-sized UAVs can be detected in advance by inspecting freight vehicles.

In general, the situation with the inspection of freight vehicles in Russia is quite interesting - despite periodic reports that enemy kamikaze UAVs are launched from the aforementioned Gazelles, the author has not noticed any particular activity in this direction, and after the attack on strategic aviation aircraft there was some visible surge of activity and then silence again...

So, let's consider possible options for "preventing" the use of enemy kamikaze UAVs launched from our territory.

Posting restrictions


Firstly, it is high time to radically change the approach to parking any trucks.

At present, they park “as God puts it into their hearts” – all the yards are filled with Gazelles, heavy-duty trucks occupy the shoulders of public roads, often ignoring the prohibitory signs – they certainly won’t be able to be towed away. Potentially, any of these trucks could contain Ukrainian kamikaze UAVs, and perhaps something worse – after all, everyone remembers the terrorist attacks in Moscow and Volgodonsk? Maybe someone thinks that Ukraine is incapable of such a thing?


The aftermath of a car bomb exploding in a residential courtyard in Volgodonsk

Accordingly, parking of any freight vehicles within the city limits – in courtyards and along public roads – should be completely prohibited.


Image drive2.ru

Where are they supposed to park then?

To achieve this, parking spaces must be created at the entrances to populated areas. Of course, city and regional administrations are unlikely to be happy about this, since these areas can be given over to the construction of yet another "human anthill", so that the implementation of parking spaces for trucks near cities and other populated areas can only be ensured by adopting the relevant laws at the federal level.

Accordingly, digitalization of the said parking spaces will allow for the establishment of records of arriving and departing vehicles, as well as, if necessary, their centralized inspection. Having information about the areas of launch of enemy kamikaze UAVs, data from road cameras, as well as data from parking spaces, it is possible to significantly increase the probability of detecting "wandering airfields" of enemy kamikaze UAVs.


Example of launching a UAV from a truck

Of course, this will not solve the problem completely, since there will still be trucks parked on private property, but their number will be significantly smaller. The possible options will include the transport of state and large commercial companies, which have their own developed control systems. The remaining ones can be checked by district police officers and the Russian National Guard, including non-departmental security.

By the way, in the courtyard of the multi-story building where the author lives, as well as in the neighboring courtyards, there are constantly a dozen Gazelles hanging around - some are parked permanently, some temporarily, but the author has not noticed any signs that any work is being done with them. I would like to believe that this is just the author's inattention, and that the work on inspecting and monitoring such vehicles is carried out systematically, at least by the same district police officers.


Image picabu.ru

Inspection points


The second component is the deployment of inspection points located at key points on highways that will be difficult to bypass.

Bridges over rivers and railways, entrances and exits to/from cities immediately suggest themselves as such. In order to avoid creating traffic jams in the area of ​​checkpoints, additional multi-lane sections several kilometers long can be implemented at key points. All cars that try to bypass inspection points must be closely checked, and their owners and drivers will be fined thousands, up to and including criminal prosecution in the event of a repeat offense.

A couple of weeks ago, the author had the opportunity to travel a couple of thousand kilometers by car in one of the southern directions. So, thousands of trucks move freely along federal highways, and their inspection, apparently, is more an exception than a rule - at present, the State Automobile Inspectorate / State Traffic Safety Inspectorate (what is this structure called now?) There are simply no resources or specialized points to ensure a comprehensive inspection.

By the way, in one of the regions a narrow road suddenly turns into a wide concrete field - apparently, this is a reserve airfield of the Russian Ministry of Defense, so, such points can be organized as inspection points, when cars will go straight along the route, and trucks will go to the side to one of dozens of inspection points. Another example of the possible appearance of inspection points - entrances to a toll road.


Entrance to the M-4 toll road – this is what truck inspection points might look like. Image by Avtodor-Platnye Dorogi LLC

Needless to say, systematization of inspection of cargo transport will not only increase protection from drone terrorism, but will also deal a blow to criminal structures – illegal transportation, smuggling, trade in stolen goods and much more.

Beacon trackers


And finally, the third component is equipping all trucks with sealed beacons-trackers with a state-issued registration function, which special services officers will be able to confiscate if there is reasonable suspicion.

Tracking beacons should include two main functions. The first is automated reading at checkpoints, parking lots and simply some points of the road network that are not visually identifiable. Thanks to this function, a map of the movements of trucks will be compiled.

The second function is to register the route of movement according to satellite navigation data - given the small volume occupied, beacon-tracker recorders can store route data for several years. All these things are already quite common for commercial freight transport, where the movement of goods is tracked almost every minute. Accordingly, there is both equipment and software - it remains only to extend this practice to all freight and special transport.


Commercial system for tracking freight transport. Image starttracker.rf

Disruption of the operation of beacon trackers and/or obstruction of their operation by third-party means should be punished.

By the way, this topic will also have quite a civil application. Currently, a huge number of garbage trucks take waste not to specialized landfills, where you have to pay for garbage disposal, but dump it wherever you want - on the sides of roads, in forests, fields, and so on and so forth. Not far from where the author lives, a beautiful forest is simply littered with construction and household waste, digging trenches along the roadsides helps, if at all, then not for long.

Conclusions


It is high time to subject the movement of freight and special vehicles to additional regulation and control.

The threat of terrorist attacks using kamikaze UAVs launched from our territory, explosives to destroy infrastructure, the possibility of transporting sabotage and reconnaissance group fighters and their weapons - all this does not say, but screams that there is a need for systemic changes in this area.

Strict regulation of the parking and movement of trucks will also provide other benefits, such as increased effectiveness in combating smuggling, drug trafficking, the removal of stolen property, including stolen cars, the transportation of illegal migrants, and much more.

Of course, all special vehicles of the corresponding weight category – garbage trucks – should also come under the control of freight transport. (Who said they can't launch kamikaze UAVs?), sewage trucks (they can be loaded with explosives) and others.

Ultimately, this could become the first serious step towards systematically countering the use of enemy kamikaze UAVs directly from the territory of the Russian Federation, as well as reducing the overall level of terrorist and criminal threats.

We will talk about hunting for enemy sabotage and reconnaissance units that transport and use kamikaze UAVs from Russian territory in the next article.
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 12
    22 August 2025 05: 06
    Bullshit, not an article.
    I was especially "pleased" by the brilliant ideas about banning entry and inspecting all trucks. Apparently, the author is good at fantasizing, but is detached from reality.
    1. +1
      22 August 2025 05: 55
      Quote: Proton
      I was especially "pleased" by the brilliant ideas about banning entry and inspecting all trucks. Apparently, the author is good at fantasizing, but is detached from reality.

      The author may be optimistic in his wishes, but before you write about "nonsense", understand that the ban on entry is your nonsense, and the author has a completely realistic ban on parking.
      1. + 10
        22 August 2025 06: 05
        Another dreamer.
        How can you prohibit the owner of a Gazelle from parking in the city? Should he come home for lunch and leave his car outside the city before that? And then, after lunch, go outside the city and pick up his car?
        Or is it possible to park for 1 hour?
        What about at night, on weekends?
        Or do you, with your fantasies, want to paralyze life in cities?
        I understand that the author of the article lives in a village of 20 houses and they only see a truck there on major church holidays.
        But in any city without trucks and vans, almost all retail outlets, construction and many other industries would immediately come to a standstill.
        Of course, you can think in terms of the 50s and deliver goods around the city on horse-drawn carts.
        1. -3
          22 August 2025 06: 16
          Your seething does not change the fact that it was you who came up with the idea about the entry ban, not the author.
          1. +5
            22 August 2025 06: 29
            This is not bubbling, this is an attempt to bring down to earth the narrow-minded dreamers who are only good at putting minuses. laughing
            1. -1
              22 August 2025 06: 31
              Quote: Proton
              How can you prohibit the owner of a Gazelle from parking in the city? Should he come home for lunch and leave his car outside the city before that? And then, after lunch, go outside the city and pick up his car?
              Or is it possible to park for 1 hour?
              What about at night, on weekends?

              It's very simple, a sign prohibiting parking for trucks. If he wants to have lunch at home, let him park his barge either in his yard, or in a permitted place, or on the territory of his enterprise. I haven't seen trams, buses, and trolleybuses abandoned en masse along the roads during lunch break.

              Quote: Proton
              But in any city without trucks and vans, almost all retail outlets, construction and many other industries would immediately come to a standstill.
              It seems that you do not understand the difference between a ban on entry and a ban on parking. Because, for example, loading and unloading is not parking.
              1. +5
                22 August 2025 07: 03
                Comrade Chief Marshall, I realize my guilt, the extent, the severity, the depth. Don't give me any more minuses, I will improve. laughing
        2. +3
          24 August 2025 01: 01
          [quote][quote] How will you prohibit the owner of a Gazelle from parking on city territory? [/quote] What is the problem? Where were you during the legislative initiatives when right-hand drive cars were banned across the country, where were you when they severely punished what color the rear lights of cars should be?

          [quote] Should he come home for lunch and leave his car outside the city before that? [/quote] Why does he go home for lunch? Most of the people who work in factories, offices, universities, hospitals don't go home for lunch. And there are many times more of them than Gazelle drivers. And yet, people somehow manage to have lunch. Or does having a Gazelle give them the exclusive right to have lunch only at home?

          [quote] And what about at night, on weekends? [/quote] Ask millions of people working in railway, water, air transport, doctors, firefighters, police officers, how do they go out on night shifts on weekends? In their Gazelles, in your opinion?

          [quote] But in any city without trucks and vans, almost all retail outlets, construction and many other industries will immediately come to a standstill. [/quote] At the same time, in Moscow they are coping very easily after the ban on the appearance of trucks in the center.

          [quote] Of course, you can think in terms of the 50s of the last century and deliver goods around the city on horse-drawn carts. [/quote] In general, the talk was mainly about parking trucks anywhere and anyhow. At the same time, many truck drivers react extremely inadequately to requests from residents not to park their trucks. Almost like you.
        3. +1
          26 November 2025 10: 11
          The author of the article lives in a village of 20 houses and they only see a truck there on major church holidays.

          For your information:
          The traffic regulations prohibit parking commercial vehicles in courtyards and adjacent areas. The problem is, no one pays attention to this ban.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. -7
          22 August 2025 07: 10
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          Vladimir... One is equivalent to the other. Why would a truck enter a city if it is not allowed to park there? To drive around the streets?


          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          Let him park his barge either in his own yard, or in an authorized place, or on the territory of his enterprise.

          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          for example, loading and unloading is not parking.


          But a total ban on parking is, of course, too much.
          1. + 14
            22 August 2025 08: 13
            Vladimir, I typed a comment and then thought that perhaps this topic is not worth discussing.
            Another issue is that a ban alone is not enough - you also need means of monitoring its implementation. Let's say a truck is allowed to carry out loading and unloading operations. Well, a truck with a drone arrives and... Parks in the wrong place without turning off the engine. And even puts up a sign - it's broken, they say. The driver gets out and disappears, look for his nose in 10 minutes. How can you react to all this?
            And another intimate question. Will Mitrofanov equip the trucks with bio-toilets at his own expense? Or should we allow truck drivers to shit out of the window right onto the sidewalk?
            1. -3
              22 August 2025 08: 20
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              Another issue is that a ban alone is not enough - you also need means of monitoring its implementation. Let's say a truck is allowed to carry out loading and unloading operations. Well, a truck with a drone arrives and... Parks in the wrong place without turning off the engine. And even puts up a sign - it's broken, they say. The driver gets out and disappears, look for his nose in 10 minutes. How can you react to all this?

              Means of control are another matter. But war, and many, I'm not talking about us, in our country still don't understand that there is a war, well war is an expensive business.
              And so, if there is a ban and many cameras in the city, stray and especially malicious trucks will be identified much faster.

              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              And another intimate question. Will Mitrofanov equip trucks with bio-toilets at his own expense? Or will he allow truck drivers to shit out of the window right onto the sidewalk?
              And what kind of sidewalk is this, if parking in the city is prohibited? Well, and somehow the problem of parking for long-haul trucks in the suburbs is solved - like motels, cafes and other things at gas stations... Not a binomial.
              1. +4
                22 August 2025 08: 56
                Quote: Vladimir_2U
                Controls are another matter.

                This is the first question. Because the system should work as a whole, not as individual components.
                Quote: Vladimir_2U
                And so, given the ban and the many cameras in the city

                This will not give anything. No one monitors the cameras online, this is a "post-mortem" recording, nothing more.
                Quote: Vladimir_2U
                What kind of sidewalk is this if parking in the city is prohibited?

                Well, he sprinkled pedestrians on the go... And that's fine, if he only sprinkled them:))))
                Quote: Vladimir_2U
                Well, somehow the problem of parking for long-distance trucks in the suburbs is being solved

                Well, that's for long-haulers, they hardly need to come into the city, and if they do come in and get stuck unloading - they can run away too. But what about a truck driver who spends all day driving around the city, if he's not supposed to park, that is, turn off the engine?
                1. -1
                  22 August 2025 09: 06
                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  This is the first question. Because the system should work as a whole, not as individual components.

                  Of course. But a ban, for example, is one of the components of the system. It can become one.

                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  This will not give anything. No one monitors the cameras online, this is a "post-mortem" recording, nothing more.
                  For some reason, AI can issue fines online. )), but not give the go-ahead for suspicious trucks. Because no one has done it.

                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  And what should a truck driver do, who drives around the city all day, if he is not allowed to park, that is, turn off the engine?
                  Once again - loading and unloading is not parking.

                  A stop is considered to be a deliberate cessation of movement for less than 5 minutes. The stop time may be longer if it is related to boarding or disembarking passengers, as well as loading or unloading things.
                  Parking means stopping movement for more than five minutes, if during this time no passengers are boarding/disembarking or loading/unloading is taking place.
            2. +7
              22 August 2025 11: 02
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              Vladimir, I typed a comment and then thought that perhaps this topic is not worth discussing.

              The author simply has no idea size problems
              As a former customs officer, I can say that the fastest inspection of a car is the use of stationary/mobile inspection systems - no less than 6 minutes per car.
              In Moscow and the Moscow region there are roughly 300 trucks - they are inspected once each 30 000 belay hours
              This alone buries the idea of ​​inspection in its bud - even without taking into account the number of employees and complexes.
              Moscow eats bread - 20 million residents, let's say 0.5 kg of bread =10 tons of bread daily.
              Quantity Can you imagine the trips of bread trucks and flour trucks to bakeries?
              Now let me remind you that in order to attack, the truck does not need to enter Moscow, i.e. all events INSIDE Moscow becomes meaningless.
              Registered in Krasnodar Krai 100 000 trucks......
              And so on.
              And this does not include foreign freight carriers.

              Half the country will have to sit at the MIDK/SIDK consoles.....
              In general, it's not science fiction, but fantasy
              1. +1
                22 August 2025 11: 59
                Quote: your1970
                In general, it's not science fiction, but fantasy

                Totally agree.
              2. -1
                23 August 2025 18: 12
                So, we need a solution in the spirit of "the alternative is ducks."
                An alternative to the mass use of trucks is to shift the center of gravity of freight transportation to trains. Naturally, this is not a quick solution; at least a five-year plan is needed here.

                And the only quick solution, one would think, is widespread patrols.
                1. -1
                  23 August 2025 22: 02
                  Inspection on the railway - due to the larger volume, the specific nature of the cargo and the impossibility of inspection on the side of the road - is impossible in any kind of mass volumes in principle
                  1. 0
                    24 August 2025 00: 25
                    Inspection at the loading stage. Unlike a truck, it is impossible to stop a train unnoticed in the bushes and throw something foreign into it.
                    1. -1
                      24 August 2025 01: 07
                      Unlike a truck, it is impossible to stop a train unnoticed in the bushes and throw something foreign at it.
                      You are too far from the true situation and the imagination of our people. I heard from friends about cheese trains that went to Moscow. They were a shunting Cheburashka, to which several wagons with goods were attached and it got to the capital under its own power. It was a long time ago. Moreover, this train at that time went to the independent one.
                      1. 0
                        24 August 2025 01: 22
                        That's exactly it, it's been that way for a long time, and if in modern conditions with cameras and turnstiles at every step some swindlers can pull off such a trick, it will only be due to the negative competence of the regulatory authorities
                      2. -1
                        31 August 2025 17: 35
                        So where are your cameras at freight stations? I'll try to explain it again. A train (locomotive with wagons) appears, with three or four wagons with goods attached, and it quietly and peacefully rolls along on its business from point A to point B. It goes past the cameras on its business, and if necessary, it can stop and wait for whoever it needs. That's it!
                        Before this, there was an article about those very drones that flew out of trucks and damaged strategists. There were a bunch of daring comments about how to put each cargo wagon on a pencil and inspect it from head to toe at each post. Nothing new, the brave cavalrymen broke into the comments and started waving their sabers. But do you and these cavalrymen know what goes in the wagons? A covered wagon can hold 80 tons of cargo. There can be almost a hundred of such wagons. Does anyone know exactly what goes in each wagon?
                        in modern conditions with cameras and turnstiles at every step
                        About a month ago, there was an article on a technical resource from a person who accidentally stumbled upon access to network routers and was suddenly able to look at those same cameras at the turnstiles. For credibility, he added photos and videos from those same cameras that are located from the waiting rooms of the stations to the service rooms of the stations. After the incident with Aeroflot, there are no guarantees that those same hackers are already sitting around and engaged in sabotage. Therefore, the presence of cameras and turnstiles, given our sloppiness and indifference, does not guarantee that some not so rascals will pull off such a trick.
                      3. 0
                        2 September 2025 02: 21
                        >> A train (locomotive with wagons) appears, with three or four wagons with goods attached

                        Do you often see freight trains with 3-4 cars?

                        >> He drives past the cameras on his own business, if necessary he can stop and wait for whoever he needs.

                        Who can a freight train wait for outside the station? Should it stop at the crossing or should it fill the locomotive with water and load coal? And what about dispatchers like does not matter, so what if a train of 4 cars stopped in a field, and the following train of 100 cars with tanks can stand there, wait, that's all. By the way, with such an attitude to unscheduled stops, it is more worth worrying about the safety of the railway tracks themselves.
                        If the train has stopped somewhere in a field, then the camera should be on the train itself on an external bracket, which, by the way, is also useful for safety in any case (for example, to be sure that some teenage train-hitcher hasn’t attached himself to the train).

                        >> But do you and these covaliers know what is riding in the carriages?

                        By the way, you have too many grammatical errors, this somehow reduces the credibility of your words.
                        If there is a terrorist threat, then the carriages need to be sealed, I’m telling you.

                        >> A covered wagon can hold 80 tons of cargo.

                        If the carriage is covered, then nothing should open on top and nothing should fly out of it either.

                        >> Therefore, the presence of cameras and turnstiles, given our sloppiness and indifference, does not in any way guarantee that some not so crooked people will pull off such a trick.

                        So, the problem is primarily in sloppiness and a careless attitude, it’s obvious.
                      4. 0
                        7 September 2025 19: 03
                        Do you often see freight trains with 3-4 cars?
                        Not infrequently during maneuvers.

                        Who might a freight train be waiting for outside the station?
                        Permissive traffic light signal. Those who are in the know, know perfectly well how to turn on the red. Every year there are a lot of incidents.

                        By the way, with such an attitude towards unscheduled stops, one should be more concerned about the safety of the railway tracks themselves.
                        Yeah, this attitude is especially noticeable when "throwing out tracks", when they "forget" to discharge them in the heat. In the PC track section, there is a high shortage of personnel in some places, a total shortage of qualified and responsible people.

                        By the way, you have too many grammatical errors, this somehow reduces the credibility of your words.
                        Marker that it is not AI that is responsible))

                        If the carriage is covered, then nothing should open on top and nothing should fly out of it either.
                        Look at the structure of a covered wagon. It has hatches on the sides and on top.

                        So, the problem is primarily in sloppiness and a careless attitude, it’s obvious.
                        There is nothing like that. Because there are official documents with large signatures and seals that everything is fine and wonderful.
                      5. 0
                        8 September 2025 17: 49
                        Not infrequently during maneuvers.

                        Shunting and lightly loaded lines are a separate conversation. Three-car freight trains do not run on the main lines.

                        >> Permissive traffic light signal.

                        A railway traffic light outside the station? Oh yeah.

                        >> this attitude is especially noticeable when “throwing out tracks”, when they “forget” to discharge them in the heat.

                        Especially.

                        >> Marker that it is not AI that is responsible))

                        Come on, if it were necessary to make AI write with typos, it would be trained in a day. So you are still under suspicion ))

                        >> It has hatches on the sides and top.

                        These are the hatches that need to be looked into during inspection, and then sealed, right?

                        >> Because there are official documents with large signatures and seals that everything is good and wonderful

                        Then why discuss anything? No matter what blunders the special services have had, in any case, under the documents everything is fine and wonderful, which means no one is to blame and nothing happened, and the fact that several strategic aircraft may become unusable - so what?
                        Next time a train with a division will arrive. Ukrainians inside, and also according to the documents everything will be fine.
                    2. -1
                      24 August 2025 08: 53
                      Quote from Evil Eye
                      Inspection at the loading stage.

                      And? It was inspected at the loading site - in Poland, China, Tajikistan, the USA. belay (40-foot containers and larger are used) - what next???
                      Is this a guarantee against sabotage?
                      I am a former customs officer who worked at both the International Automobile Checkpoint and the Railway Checkpoint - it is impossible to carry out any significant inspections at border checkpoints.
                      1. +1
                        24 August 2025 09: 23
                        Firstly, if the container was loaded, let's say, in Poland, and then sabotage drones took off from this container, then this is already a reason to roll out diplomatic claims against Poland, and documented ones at that, and not at the level of "we know that it is your fault."

                        2nd, why is it impossible?
                      2. -1
                        24 August 2025 15: 14
                        Quote from Evil Eye
                        Firstly, if the container was loaded, let's say, in Poland, and then sabotage drones took off from this container, then this is already a reason to roll out diplomatic claims against Poland, and documented ones at that, and not at the level of "we know that it is your fault."

                        1) Who were we able to make claims to for the truck with polyethylene film that exploded on the Crimean Bridge? Which passed through 8 countries?

                        2) inspection period depending on the cargo from 1 hour to one and a half days. Composition of roughly 50 containers - from 50 hours to 75 days
                        On average, 12 trains per day arrive from Kazakhstan via Ozinki.
                        That is, if you stop for inspection only daily cargo flow - from 600 hours to 750 days.
                        Catch it?
                        The stopped Daily flow completely disrupts all cargo transportation in 11 countries at once.
                        And some goods for example technically impossible to inspect - for example, tomato paste or liquefied oxygen or uranium concentrate or yellow phosphorus....
                      3. 0
                        24 August 2025 16: 40
                        1) It seems like we were writing about railways, and now you’re talking about trucks again.
                        2) Ah, I see. So the inspection should not be full, like during a customs inspection, but minimal - to make sure that there are no drones ready to attack in the car. And what is in the depths of the car under the stacks or in the depths of the containers, especially, you see, inside the tomato paste and liquefied oxygen - that's another question. A drone saboteur cannot quickly jump out of a cylinder with compressed oxygen.
                      4. -1
                        24 August 2025 19: 25
                        Quote from Evil Eye
                        1) It seems like we were writing about railways, and now you’re talking about trucks again.

                        They wrote about
                        Quote from Evil Eye
                        let's say, in Poland, and then sabotage drones took off from this container, then this is already a reason to roll out diplomatic claims against Poland, and documented ones at that, and not at the level of "we know that it is your fault."
                        I gave you an example
                        Quote: your1970
                        Who could we make a claim to for the truck with polyethylene film that exploded on the Crimean Bridge? Passing through 8 countries?


                        Quote from Evil Eye
                        2) Ah, I see. So the inspection should not be full, like during a customs inspection, but minimal - to make sure that there are no drones ready to attack in the car. And what is in the depths of the car under the stacks or in the depths of the containers, especially, you see, inside the tomato paste and liquefied oxygen - that's another question. A drone saboteur cannot quickly jump out of a cylinder with compressed oxygen.

                        That is, you have no understanding that there may not be a ready-made saboteur drone there, but, for example, 50 tons of explosives. And what if, after the sabotage, questions arise for the person conducting the inspection - how did he overlook 50 tons of explosives? answer"And there were no ready drones there!!" - won't work. And no one will take such responsibility - and there will be a full inspection.
                        And this means - see my post earlier - a dead end with huge losses
                      5. 0
                        25 August 2025 13: 58
                        I wrote about trains, not trucks.
                        It is impossible to throw 50 tons of explosives into a sealed wagon in 5 minutes without being noticed. This means that if the wagon was loaded in Poland and arrived sealed through 8 or 80 countries, then the claims will be against Poland and only against Poland. What is unclear here?
                      6. -1
                        25 August 2025 14: 02
                        Quote: Evil Eye
                        I wrote about trains, not trucks.
                        It is impossible to throw 50 tons of explosives into a sealed wagon in 5 minutes without being noticed. This means that if the wagon was loaded in Poland and arrived sealed through 8 or 80 countries, then the claims will be against Poland and only against Poland. What is unclear here?

                        15 minutes on 2 pallet trucks - elementary.
                        Seals are counterfeited quite easily at the state level.
                        Once again - if you don't get it - we were unable to prove the guilt of the state that sent the truck on the Crimean Bridge.
                      7. 0
                        25 August 2025 15: 12
                        >>15 minutes on 2 pallet trucks - elementary

                        At the station or in an open field? Can a loader climb right up the embankment? laughing

                        >>Seals are counterfeited quite easily at the state level.

                        Then the problem is not in the trucks or the drones, so why start a fight?

                        >>we were unable to prove the guilt of the state that sent the truck on the Crimean Bridge.

                        Isn't this the same truck that was driving from Armavir to Simferopol in 2022? Well, it's really hard to prove anything here. laughing
            3. +1
              22 August 2025 16: 38
              Let's say a truck is allowed to carry out loading and unloading operations. Well, a truck with a drone arrived and... Parked in the wrong place without turning off the engine. And even put up a sign - it's broken, they say. The driver got out and disappeared, look for his whistles in 10 minutes. How to react to all this?
              the range of drones allows a truck to be stopped at any cafe on a bypass road, 30 km in a straight line is not an incredible range. And the driver may not be aware
            4. -2
              23 August 2025 18: 15
              In this case, some quick solution is needed. Roughly speaking, seal the truck, and open it only upon arrival at the recipient of the cargo in his presence. And patrols on the streets.
              1. -1
                23 August 2025 20: 59
                what's the point if they fly up from all sides of the container roof into the tape to roll up? and if the car has several points, say, a truck that drives around supermarkets in the morning
                1. -1
                  23 August 2025 21: 38
                  Seal after each stop.
                  1. +1
                    24 August 2025 08: 57
                    Quote: Evil Eye
                    Seal after each stop.

                    Who will run after him with a seal? There are 300 trucks in Moscow, many of them scurry back and forth all day long...
                    1. 0
                      24 August 2025 09: 24
                      Driver and recipient of the previous cargo.
                      1. 0
                        24 August 2025 15: 17
                        Quote from Evil Eye
                        Driver

                        1 million bucks and he will seal the bald devil - carefully trimmed by him -
                      2. -1
                        24 August 2025 15: 24
                        Quote: your1970
                        he is a bald devil - carefully trimmed by him - they will seal

                        Sergey, hi

                        Why cut it? bald feature?
                      3. 0
                        24 August 2025 19: 16
                        Quote: Paranoid62
                        Quote: your1970
                        he is a bald devil - carefully trimmed by him - they will seal

                        Sergey, hi

                        Why cut it? bald feature?

                        He is bald because
                        Quote: your1970
                        carefully trimmed by him-
                        belay lol
                      4. 0
                        24 August 2025 16: 41
                        Then the driver should be tried as an accomplice.
                      5. -1
                        24 August 2025 19: 17
                        Quote: Evil Eye
                        Then the driver should be tried as an accomplice.

                        Has he already left the country or was he killed??? How many people were able to judge the driver of the truck that exploded on the Crimean Bridge?
    2. +5
      22 August 2025 12: 03
      The author and others like him are from the cohort of those who want to turn the country into a "military camp"...
    3. -1
      24 August 2025 00: 47
      For once a more or less normal article taking into account modern realities and then the first comment without justification is shitting. Okay. When criticizing, suggest. What can you suggest? Is there anything that is not crazy.
  2. +6
    22 August 2025 05: 29
    Recently, the number of cases of attacks by Ukrainian kamikaze unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) on objects located in the rear areas of the Russian Federation has increased significantly. However, for the benefit of those who are “doomed to die,” it should be noted that the number of strikes carried out by the Russian Armed Forces on objects located throughout the territory of Ukraine, increased to an even greater extent.

    It is difficult even to comment on such “Mitrofanovism”, but it is possible and necessary.
    Mr. Mitrofanov! War is not wrestling, where you exchange fake blows.
  3. + 15
    22 August 2025 05: 39
    An article from the category "Dreamers" detached from reality🤦👎 And also not reading the site itself🤦 Here at the top is an article that the police have no one to come to calls, 60% are unequipped, and here are such fantasies. In general, lately the level of articles on the site is getting lower and lower😒
  4. -4
    22 August 2025 05: 41
    If authorized persons properly perform their duties, there is more than enough control. But the author's proposals for additional control will result in the well-known formula of Mr. Chernomyrdin, "...we wanted the best..." smile
  5. + 14
    22 August 2025 05: 52
    All world experience shows that the terrorist threat is eliminated in two stages. In the first stage, the leadership of terrorist organizations is destroyed. In our case, it is an expired Ukrainian clown with his entourage. In the second stage, funding channels are easily identified, which will be forced to try to restore the terrorist organization, with their natural liquidation in the process.
    At this point, any terrorist activity will cease, including that involving the use of UAVs.
    The problem is that the Russian government considers the Kiev regime to be legitimate and is fighting exclusively against the perpetrators. Therefore, no matter what the FSB or our smart guys from the research institute come up with, the terrorist war will be waged one-sidedly.
    1. -2
      22 August 2025 11: 10
      Quote: Vitaly.17
      All world experience shows that the terrorist threat is eliminated in two stages. In the first stage, the leadership of terrorist organizations is destroyed.

      Quote: Vitaly.17
      At this point, any terrorist activity ceases.


      Lol - Hamas, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Hezbollah are quietly laughing. And the IRA and the Basques are twirling their fingers at their temples.
      What's with the need to occupy the Gaza Strip - even though all the leaders have been killed a hundred times??!!
      In this "All the world's experience" is boldly thrown into the trash
      1. +2
        22 August 2025 16: 54
        And have the aforementioned organizations carried out many terrorist attacks after the liquidation of their leadership? Well, except in our country?
      2. 0
        23 August 2025 21: 32
        some need a hot spot nearby so that if something happens they can blame it on terrorist threats, test new weapons and seem more civilized in contrast to their neighbors, in which case they can tighten the screws on their own population for the sake of safety, of course ))
        1. 0
          23 August 2025 22: 05
          Quote: red-eye
          some need a hot spot nearby so that if something happens, they can blame it on terrorist threats

          Has anyone cancelled Dagestan and Central Asia????
    2. -1
      24 August 2025 01: 10
      The author gave an example of Israel's actions against Iran's air defense. What kind of fight is expected in a similar case?
  6. 0
    22 August 2025 06: 21
    Andrey raised a very topical issue. If nothing is done, everything will get even worse. Some proposals can be implemented now. Others may need some more thought. But this needs to be addressed now.
    1. +3
      22 August 2025 08: 10
      The most important thing is that the author has not figured out where to get the money for all this. The sites for transport need to be "born" from somewhere? Prepared, equipped with sites for garbage removal. Provide for the removal of solid waste. Organize the cleaning of the territory in the summer and (especially) in the winter. Who, how and with what means will do this? Does the author know that first all this needs to be provided, and only then prohibited, and not vice versa?!
      As for inspections, everything depends on local authorities. In particular, in St. Petersburg, police officers are already doing this. They walk around and inspect cars on the side of the street. That is, if there is a desire...
  7. +6
    22 August 2025 06: 28
    the proposal to create another security theater that will eat up additional human and economic resources plus downtime that will lead to higher logistics costs and an increase in the final cost of cargo (with already high prices for delivery from abroad due to sanctions and customs) and long-haulers who already don't feel very good with restrictions and platons won't say thank you

    IMHO, but what prevents the enemy (hypothetical or real) from setting up all these operations already on the territory of the state, as Mossad supposedly did in Iran?
  8. +6
    22 August 2025 06: 28
    However, for the benefit of those who are “all lost”, it should be noted that

    However, for the benefit of those who have “found everything,” it should be noted that the concerns of Russian citizens are not unfounded and meaningful, because each tragedy that these drones bring is specific to a particular Russian family.
  9. 0
    22 August 2025 07: 04
    Systematic counteraction to drone terrorism

    The only way to counter it is to immediately send a similar response to the customer in the country. There are simply no other methods.
    1. +2
      22 August 2025 07: 32
      or declare that all sides of the conflict have won and everyone is great ))) (analogy with the American-Israeli-Iranian conflict)
    2. -2
      22 August 2025 11: 13
      Quote: paul3390
      Systematic counteraction to drone terrorism

      The only way to counter it is to immediately send a similar response to the customer in the country. There are simply no other methods.

      Hit civilians? And what will that give us? "Bucha-2-3...10"?
      And Geraniums are flying over the military and infrastructure anyway.
    3. -1
      23 August 2025 18: 16
      And how do you know who the end customer is? Maybe it will turn out that the customer is some of the remaining remnants of organizations banned in the Russian Federation from the Middle East. Or the Japanese.
  10. Owl
    +4
    22 August 2025 08: 29
    Medium-sized UAVs of the airplane type launched from sections of asphalt roads are most likely imported through Kazakhstan, is it possible to "x-ray" all containers and trucks to detect piston engines? Most likely - no. There are enough Ukrainian agents, a large number of "refugees" who became citizens of the Russian Federation have relatives in Ukraine, and recruitment through relatives (threats or promises) is very effective, first "small stuff" (to look and pass on), and then with the help of blackmail - involve in more serious crimes. Do the FSB and the Ministry of Internal Affairs have the forces and means for total control over this mass of potential terrorists? And over "citizens - valuable specialists" aged 20-30 who arrived from Asian republics? Until the "supreme" gives the command to restore the Ministry of Internal Affairs, to purge local "leaders" and "law enforcement officers" who handed out citizenship and protect diasporas - nothing will change.
    1. -1
      22 August 2025 11: 15
      Quote: Eagle Owl
      are imported through Kazakhstan, is it possible to "x-ray" all containers and trucks to detect piston engines? Most likely - no.

      All checkpoints of the border of the Republic of Kazakhstan-Russian Federation equipped with stationary inspection and screening complexes...
  11. +3
    22 August 2025 08: 32
    In general, parking of trucks with a gross weight of more than 3,5 tons in a residential area is prohibited. Art. 12.28 of the Code of Administrative Offenses.
    1. -1
      24 August 2025 01: 14
      But who cares? Even here there are commentators who don't know or don't want to know.
  12. 0
    22 August 2025 09: 25
    I love this photo of the parking lot in front of the author's house (if it is his house). The cars are packed like sardines in a barrel, there is a crush, and there is virtually no way to quickly evacuate in case of a fire. And right next to the parking lot is a huge empty space, littered with rubble, which could be turned into a parking lot. But it is impossible. Because this is Russia! love
    1. +3
      22 August 2025 10: 30
      Medvezhonok (Bear Cub), respected Mr. Mitrofanov, not long ago in the comments on "V.O." reported that he lives in one of the Tri-Baltic tigers, and for many years has been a chief engineer on ships of a West German company...
      How can I evaluate his material today? I think, perhaps I am widely and deeply mistaken, it is written according to the principle: "I write, you read, I have already received the fee, beauty..."
      Although I am not as ancient as a piece of papont's skin, the article by the anti-terrorist specialist, for some reason??? made me remember the essay by the Vermont recluse "How Should We Organize Russia?", which was published on the same day by "Literaturnaya Gazeta" and "Komsomolskaya Pravda" in the fall of 1990. Probably because both authors, having no idea at all about the reality of life in different regions of Russia, considered themselves specialists who could turn their thoughts into printed form. And most importantly, their materials were printed, read and discussed...
    2. 0
      22 August 2025 16: 40
      Quote: Little Bear
      The cars are packed like sardines in a barrel, there is a total crush, and there is practically no possibility of a quick evacuation in case of a fire. And right next to the parking lot there is a huge empty space, littered with rubble, which could be turned into a parking lot.

      But no one will park there. Because 95% of our drivers are disabled by the traffic authorities, for whom it is simply impossible to walk from the parking lot to the front door. They would rather park in two or three layers right at the front door. smile
      In our yard, the owner of two Gazelles parked them under his windows on a tiny sidewalk between the lawn and the yard driveway, warming them up for 10-15 minutes before each exit.
      1. -1
        22 August 2025 18: 23
        Quote: Alexey RA

        In our yard, the owner of two Gazelles parked them under his windows on a tiny sidewalk between the lawn and the yard driveway, warming them up for 10-15 minutes before each exit.

        A bunch of grapes on top - the pigeons get indigestion from it - they will make a mess on everyone.
        Works with passenger cars too.....
      2. 0
        23 August 2025 18: 19
        In such cases, I recall the phrase said by Jean Reno's character in the film "Mission Impossible": let's rob a bank, I'll land the plane in the lobby and we'll drive it straight to the safe )))
  13. -2
    22 August 2025 11: 30
    30 years of capitalism in Russia, and the author believes in fairy tales.)))
  14. -1
    22 August 2025 14: 11
    There is another way to combat drone terrorism. In advance
    identify the organizers of such actions. And also in advance
    shoot. Inhumane, but effective.
  15. +2
    23 August 2025 02: 57
    The State Automobile Inspectorate/Traffic Police have been optimized. There are very few inspectors left. Now drivers are controlled by cameras and toll roads. In addition, the Ministry of Internal Affairs is understaffed like in the 90s. It seems fantastic to assign control at checkpoints and checkpoints to the police.
  16. -1
    23 August 2025 18: 23
    For some reason, everyone rushed to criticize the author, instead of offering alternative solutions (if we consider that the author's proposals are in many ways difficult to implement). The problem exists, and it is unlikely to resolve itself over time, rather the opposite.
    The most obvious solution is to reverse the trend of population concentration in megacities by 180 degrees. Megacities are not needed smile
    1. 0
      15 November 2025 22: 26
      Quote: Evil Eye
      ...expand trend on concentration

      belay

      Who should I turn around? Translation from Kryakoma into Russian, please, if it's not too much trouble. hi
      Yes, regarding the human anthills - I agree, they are not needed (not my minus).
  17. +1
    23 August 2025 18: 56
    Well, there are enough cameras for fining money, on every pole! But here it's a dead end! What if we put a simple radar detector for explosives above every overpass!
    1. -1
      24 August 2025 09: 04
      Quote: ose4kinsura
      if above each overpass simple Install a radar detector for explosives!

      Once will create - that's how it will be. There are just a lot of nuances - the travel speed is no more than 10 km/h, it depends on the body material and the load.
      So in 20-30 years they will definitely create everything
  18. +1
    28 August 2025 09: 16
    Kamikaze UAV launched by enemy from Russian territory

    Recognition of the complete impotence of the Vershoks to defend the country...
  19. 0
    8 September 2025 22: 38
    Perhaps we need to organize a structure that would analyze threats, predict the most dangerous directions, and engage in anti-terrorist activities.
    It seems that there was such a structure in the USSR, I forgot what it was called...
  20. 0
    14 September 2025 20: 37
    How about not pumping the country with poor Ukrainian refugees and migrants, ready to blow up and kill even for the promise of a reward? What would happen if someone suggested welcoming 42-43 citizens of Nazi Germany? So not only do we not have Stalin, we don't have brains either.
  21. 0
    15 November 2025 22: 23
    Quote: Author
    ...be checked by district police officers and the Russian National Guard, including non-departmental security...digitalization of the said parking spaces will allow for better accounting...and work on inspecting and monitoring such vehicles is carried out systematically, at least by the same district police officers by police officers.

    No.
    It's not even funny to me, but the imagination is cool.
  22. 0
    19 November 2025 19: 55
    Hmm... Let's just say it's unrealistic to defend against isolated attacks. It's not even clear yet which direction to dig in.
    A mass search? I can't quite imagine how that's even theoretically possible. If I understand correctly from the internet, regarding Operation "Spiderweb," there's a space of maybe ten to fifteen centimeters under the roof. How can you spot it by inspecting it from the inside? What if the truck is full of boxes? Unload them all? And do this with every one of the hundreds of thousands of trucks, every day, for years?
    Markings, beacons, etc. Okay, so we've spotted a specific truck, but what next? At what point was it equipped? Is the driver aware of it, or is he being used in the dark? What if the driver is no longer there, or isn't there at all?
    And that's one method of sabotage. But how can we counter new ones when they appear? And they will appear...
    Personally, I don’t have any answers yet.
    Something else is possible with aircraft-type UAVs. For example, networked sound listeners on each cell tower. Engines have a distinct sound, whether propeller or jet. The network is needed to promptly update firmware to match the specific signal characteristics that need to be extracted and transmitted from each specific tower to the AI ​​for analysis. Threats, routes... and recommend time, location, and countermeasures.
    But that's expensive. And it's not guaranteed to be effective. If this method becomes more complicated, another one will be used—for example, by increasing the heights so the sound doesn't reach them. And it could turn out that the expense of listening devices will be entirely in vain.
    Yes, gentlemen, congratulations, we are at the beginning of an era of terror. Often impersonal.
    I must admit that decisions not taken in time by management will have particularly grave consequences for everyone.
    Actually, I know a way to avoid such a development of events...
    Throw everyone back to the Middle Ages... I'm afraid that's how it will all end.
  23. 0
    14 December 2025 19: 15
    Who will pay? Who will be the contractor? Who will be responsible, and what about force majeure? Does the author believe resources are infinite? In the author's mind, it's simple. Let's do it.))) By the way, the author missed Plato.))) Not a disgrace, of course, but the approach is in question.