Flamingo: Ukrainian missile of foreign origin

20 263 29
Flamingo: Ukrainian missile of foreign origin
A pair of launchers with rockets "Flamingo". Photo AP


A few days ago, Ukraine showed its new land-based cruise missile called "Flamingo" for the first time. It is claimed that this product has the highest tactical and technical characteristics and combat qualities. However, the specific appearance of this missile raises a lot of questions and doubts of various kinds. In addition, even the Ukrainian origin of this weapons.



New sample


The emergence of a new missile system in Ukraine became known on August 17. Ukrainian sources revealed the very fact of the existence of the "Flamingo" product, and also named the main characteristics of such a missile. In addition, they published a photograph of several products and a short video showing the launch of the missile.

It is claimed that the Flamingo missile was developed by the Ukrainian company Fire Point, which previously produced only traditional-looking UAVs. By now, the company has managed to complete all the main work on the new complex and even brought it to serial production.

The first serial missiles were recently transferred to the Ukrainian armed formations. It is reported that the first attempts to use them in combat have already taken place. Thus, the published video shows an alleged combat launch at a real Russian target. However, the results of this strike attempt are not reported - probably due to their absence.

Ukrainian sources claim that the Flamingo has high tactical, technical and combat characteristics. The flight range of this missile reaches 3000 km. There is a warhead weighing 1150 kg on board. Other details of the project have not yet been officially specified.

Much hope is being placed on the new cruise missile, as is the case with a number of other weapons. Ukrainian and foreign propaganda claims that such a system is capable of attacking and destroying Russian targets at a great distance from the combat zone. Maps are published showing the Flamingo's kill zone extending to the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and Omsk Oblast.


Rocket launch using a solid-fuel booster. Photo Zn.ua

However, all published information about the Flamingo raises serious doubts. The real origin of this project, the real characteristics of the complex and its real combat capabilities raise questions. Apparently, reality is far from the statements of the Ukrainian side.

Foreign footprint


In February of this year, the UAE hosted the next military-industrial exhibition IDEX-2025. At this event, the British-Emirati group of companies Milanion Group presented materials on its new development for the first time - the FP-5 land-based cruise missile.

The exhibition showed a model of a missile with a specific appearance, and also revealed the calculated tactical and technical characteristics. In essence, a heavy "missile aircraft" with a high subsonic flight speed and a range of up to 3000 km was proposed.

The Milanion Group reported its readiness for serial production of missiles. It was stated that it could produce 50 munitions per month using its existing capacities. However, nothing was reported about the availability of orders for the delivery of such systems.

It should be noted that the Milanion Group has some connections with Ukraine. Thus, since 2022-23, it has been cooperating with some Ukrainian organizations, and through them it supplies its products or products from third-party manufacturers. Until recently, it was about robotic complexes and some types artillery.

Judging by the last news, now the British-Emirati company has established cooperation in the field of rocket technology. Its FP-5 rocket has arrived in Ukraine and changed its name. In addition, this product has a new developer and manufacturer.


Overall, a rather interesting picture is emerging. Great Britain intends to support Ukraine in the military-technical sphere, but does not want to supply it with weapons directly. For this reason, a joint venture with the UAE is used, through which ready-made missile systems or documentation for their manufacture are transferred to Kyiv.

It is quite clear why such a scheme was built. With its help, Great Britain can transport long-range weapons with increased potential to Ukraine, but formally remain on the sidelines. If necessary, all responsibility can be shifted to Ukraine or to a British-Emirati joint venture.

Technical features


The FP-5 or Flamingo is a ground-based medium-range missile system. It consists of a large-sized and heavy cruise missile, a towed launcher for it, and a set of various means and systems for launch preparation and combat use.

The cruise missile is made according to a normal aerodynamic scheme. It has a cylindrical fuselage and a wing of small sweep. In the tail section, above the fuselage, there is an engine nacelle. Next to it is an X-shaped stabilizer with rudders.

The FP-5 missile (and, accordingly, the Flamingo) has a wingspan of 6 m. The length of the product is probably twice as much. The launch weight is up to 6 tons. Of this, about 1 ton is the warhead.

The munition is launched from an inclined guide using a solid-fuel booster. The flight is carried out by a turbojet engine of an unnamed model. With its help, the speed reaches 900-950 km/h. The maximum flight range is 3 thousand km. The missile can rise to a height of 5 km.


Model of the FP-5 rocket at the IDEX-2025 exhibition. Photo Bmpd.livejournal.com

FP-5 has an autopilot that operates according to a preset program. Inertial and interference-protected satellite systems are used for navigation.

The missile uses a launcher based on a car trailer. Such a trailer with a missile on it is moved by a tractor-trailer with the necessary characteristics. The installation has an inclined guide and a number of other devices. Preparation for the launch of the missile after arrival at the position takes from 20 to 40 minutes.

It can be assumed that the large-sized missile is transported partially disassembled and, possibly, with empty fuel tanks. Once in position, the wing is attached to it, fueling is carried out, and other procedures are carried out. This is why preparation for launch takes tens of minutes.

Dubious development


According to the developers, the "Ukrainian" cruise missile "Flamingo" has high tactical and technical characteristics and combat qualities. However, its technical appearance shows that such estimates are far from reality. The actual potential of such a missile system is not very high.

The only advantages of the FP-5 product are its long range and heavy warhead. These characteristics make it stand out from various modern missile systems, including those in service with Ukraine. However, other design features will not allow it to realize its potential in terms of range and combat load.

It is easy to see that high flight and combat characteristics are achieved due to the large size and weight. At the same time, the design of the missile is distinguished by a certain simplicity, and it does not provide for any measures to reduce visibility.


From the point of view of anti-aircraft weapons and systems, the Flamingo is a subsonic aerodynamic target with a fairly large effective scattering surface. Detecting and destroying such an object will not be associated with any difficulties. Modern Russian radars and air defense systems successfully cope with more complex targets.

The FP-5 is equipped with a control system that allows it to attack only stationary targets with known coordinates. At the same time, satellite navigation is subject to interference, and inertial navigation limits the accuracy of the hit. The actual accuracy of such a missile should be significantly lower than expected. Hitting small objects will be virtually impossible.

However, it should be taken into account that Ukraine will try to use the new missiles for further terrorist strikes on cities or civilian objects. In this case, the Flamingo does not require high accuracy - any hit within a populated area will be sensitive.

Predictable outcome


Thus, foreign partners and patrons have once again decided to help Ukraine by supplying missile weapons, but this time they are disguising it as a local development. It is claimed that the Flamingo product has passed all stages of development and has already been brought to series production and combat use.

However, the real potential of such a cruise missile is highly questionable. Modern Defense will cope with it without difficulty, and a breakthrough to the designated target is unlikely. In addition, it should be expected that the Russian army will try to detect and destroy not only the missile systems, but also their storage and production sites.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    20 August 2025 05: 26
    With its help, the speed reaches 900-950 km/h. The maximum flight range is 3 thousand km.

    Looks like a V-2...they'll start hitting our cities.
    1. 0
      20 August 2025 06: 03
      However, the real potential of such a cruise missile is highly questionable.

      Of course, there is a lot of lies in the Ukrainian and Western media, but you shouldn't expect these missiles to fly into someone else's garden. This is being done against Russia and its citizens.
      In addition, it should be expected that the Russian army will try to detect and destroy not only missile systems, but also their storage and production sites.

      As happened during the destruction of Ukrainian enterprises engaged in the production of Sapsan ballistic missiles.
    2. +2
      20 August 2025 11: 42
      Modern air defense can easily cope with it, and a breakthrough to the designated target is unlikely.

      Modern air defense may cope, but where can we get it in our country, where even the enemy's slow-moving agricultural aircraft AI-22, converted into unmanned and filled with explosives, easily fly to Kazan, Nizhny Novgorod and Ufa. What can we say about cruise missiles flying at a speed of 900 km/h?
      1. +4
        20 August 2025 12: 15
        However, if this "V" flies in a group of others, including false targets, then whether it will be shot down or not is a difficult question.
      2. 0
        20 August 2025 12: 33
        it's much easier to deal with missiles because the air defense was designed for missiles
        1. +1
          20 August 2025 15: 44
          Air defense was primarily designed for aircraft. If you shot down half the aircraft, the problem is with the one who launched it. If you shot down half the ammunition, the problem is with you.
          1. +1
            21 August 2025 06: 54
            and against missiles, they were not designed for drones, that's why they let them through
            1. +2
              21 August 2025 12: 54
              against missiles

              No.
              Modern air defense systems have both radars and missiles that are quite capable of shooting down both high-speed ballistic targets and low-altitude aerodynamic ones. But they still often do it worse than aircraft.
              Because these are not airplane flight modes.
              Flying like a Tomahawk along the ground, between rocks at high speed for an airplane is a very good level of piloting. Just as airplanes do not fly into the ground at a speed of several Machs.
              Such targets are always more difficult to hit.
    3. +2
      20 August 2025 14: 20
      Only V-1. V-2 is a vertical launch rocket, without horizontal tail of the aircraft type.
  2. +2
    20 August 2025 05: 55
    without the PU-jet, the V-1 is not a V-1, but it is very similar
    1. 0
      21 August 2025 02: 59
      I don't know what the comments are comparing it to the V-1. It looks like a default turbine cruise missile, which was produced by all participants in the Cold War from the 60s-70s. It seems to me that it is in the Tomahawk class and in terms of characteristics it probably corresponds to its early modifications. The UAE does not have an advanced military but has many (of varying degrees of success) startups that do not require a serious technological base, just like Ukraine. A simple jet engine (so that it can work for 3-3.5 hours). Steel/aluminum/magnesium/composite body. A cheap explosive. A stabilization and control system (from civilian Chinese stuff). The most expensive element here is the guidance and course correction module (with the ability to perform maneuvers or hug the ground on the main section of the route), and most likely this module is bought either from the UAE or from another supplier of fillings. (USA/UK/Germany/Israel/France/Sweden/China) as far as I understand the tactical purpose of this product is to terrorize the Russian rear with news that something has flown somewhere very far to hit the intended target (if it is a military-industrial complex plant or a city of 500k+ it should not pose a serious threat, it seems to me), but given the many blind spots it should fly far (if of course the victorious one can get them in sufficient quantity) besides, a 1000 kg warhead does not sound very plausible, but even 400-500 is more than enough to destroy a 50x100 m reinforced concrete box (+- the size of the factory workshop)
      1. 0
        24 August 2025 01: 27
        In other words, we ourselves can churn out something similar in mass production based on modified engines from the same 60-70s?
  3. Eug
    +2
    20 August 2025 06: 36
    Most likely, the development (or modification for the Ukrainian Armed Forces) was carried out with the participation of specialists from Ukraine. NPO Khartron made SU for a similar product in the 80s for several orders with different types of launch. The head organization was NPO Mash named after Efremov (Reutov). So I would not be particularly surprised if the Ukrainian roots are real, at least in terms of cooperation.
  4. kig
    +2
    20 August 2025 08: 17
    What difference does it make whose it is? The main thing is that it exists and can arrive soon.
  5. +1
    20 August 2025 10: 11
    The whole problem is that it will not be produced for Ukraine, and it is capable of striking deep into Russian territory where Russian strike weapons are produced. It is like a big Storm Shadow with a Ukrainian label. Counting only on air defense, this will put itself in a disadvantageous position in advance. An adequate response is only a strike at the place of actual production of these missiles, and this must be communicated to its manufacturers.
  6. +3
    20 August 2025 11: 21
    Am I right in understanding that the Missile Technology Control Regime, of which Britain is a member, has quietly died? And now it is possible to supply long-range cruise missiles to anyone?
    1. +5
      20 August 2025 12: 05
      If gentlemen lose, they change the rules of the game in their favor
      1. +1
        20 August 2025 14: 25
        I also think that it is time to hand over at least URANI to the Houthis and at the same time help with the tactics of use. And also "accidentally" in the ports of the UK to blow up several unloading tankers.

        P.S.: Carthage "London" must be destroyed!
    2. +1
      20 August 2025 15: 46
      And when did it work? It's just a set of voluntary restrictions to prevent anyone from supplying missiles to the West's adversaries - countries like North Korea or Iran. It didn't stop anyone from supplying Tomahawks to Australia or JASSM-ERs to Finland.
      1. 0
        24 August 2025 21: 22
        as in pirates of the caribbean the code is a set of recommendations and not strict rules
  7. +3
    20 August 2025 12: 04
    I think I've read and written about "Flamingo" somewhere. Well, I'll write it again. After the use of the 404th such missile, Ukraine needs to be treated with all seriousness. The treatment is simple: A strike, and a ground one, on military, infrastructure and logistics centers in Western Ukraine with tactical nuclear weapons, and with an easterly wind.
    1. +2
      20 August 2025 12: 09
      Aha, I found it. On August 18, VO published an article "New Ukrainian missile "Flamingo" turned out to be a British development". However, the Flamingo missile is very serious. 1 ton of explosives is not a joke, it is not an aircraft-type UAV.
  8. +2
    20 August 2025 12: 42
    Looks like a modified "STRIZH"
    https://topwar.ru/195123-bpla-tu-141-strizh-i-tu-143-rejs-ot-razvedki-do-mishenej.html
  9. 0
    20 August 2025 15: 41
    Zelensky's main merit is that the Flamingo missile has been set up for production abroad. But in the Ukrainian Armed Forces it is only assembled in garages.
  10. +1
    20 August 2025 22: 00
    It seems doubtful that drones with a plywood body and a fuel tank made of plastic bottles have a guidance system with an accuracy of less than 10 meters, while the Victory rocket, which is clearly highly anticipated, will have a system with a spread of 50+ meters.
  11. +1
    21 August 2025 14: 27
    It strongly resembles the V-1. The range is impressive, as is the warhead.
    We need to find the location of production and liquidate it.
  12. 0
    22 August 2025 00: 20
    It's like a slimmed down P700
  13. 0
    22 August 2025 16: 12
    In addition to the fact that this "ukro-rocket" is suspiciously similar to the British-UAE development, it is also practically a copy of the German V-1, which was created in Germany just before the defeat (https://www.politnavigator.net/ukrainskijj-general-raspiarennaya-raketa-flamingo-okazalas-kopiejj-gitlerovskojj-fau-1.html). Involuntarily, a comparison of the German history of defeat with the Ukrainian one comes to mind ))))) They also want to get a wonder weapon before their inevitable end....
  14. 0
    11 October 2025 16: 16
    They wrote that they've already hit one flamingo. There's even a photo circulating online. Somewhere in the forest. They're not saying what hit it, though. And it's not really necessary.