Modern bodyguard revolvers

44 334 148
Modern bodyguard revolvers


Forget about your thousand comrades
And hundreds of other chimeras
You will never find a friend,
Than your combat revolver!




Adam Lindsay Gordon


stories about weapons. The previous material about compact pistols was generally liked by readers, but a number of questions were asked about it. First of all, about the source of information, like, “you didn’t write about everything” (it was about pistol cartridges). And the thing is that, as a rule, such materials are rewritten articles from various foreign magazines, in particular, the magazine “Ganz International”.

Of course, any topic can be expanded, and, moreover, expanded indefinitely. But is it worth it? In my opinion, it is much more useful to provide a readable text that can encourage the reader to independently search for the information that interests him. Not all of our "VO" readers receive this magazine, not all of them read it. So, it is better to have relatively small information than a "novel" of 25-30 thousand characters, which, in principle, cannot be read online. And there have been, are, and will be inaccuracies in any material, since they were in foreign authors. Everyone sees and writes in their own way. But to a certain extent, this is good, because it gives our readers the opportunity to show off their erudition and get satisfaction from numerous advantages. Well, there was also a request to read about pocket revolvers for everyday carry. We are fulfilling this request ...

So, let's look at the best 9mm revolvers for everyday carry (in the original, we are talking, apparently, about revolvers chambered for the 9mm Luger pistol cartridge). Let's remember that extracting spent cartridges with a modern accelerator - the Full Moon Clip - is quick and easy. Without it, it is questionable at best, and in some cases completely impossible, depending on the design of the revolver. True, pistol magazines are flat and convenient, but the Moon Clip with cartridges is bulky and, moreover, bends easily without them if stored improperly. But it is convenient to carry in a pocket or pouch.

But what do you get when you cross a time-tested revolver platform with the most popular centerfire pistol cartridge? The answer is a 9mm Luger revolver. The revolver is a timeless weapon that remains highly prized. And why not? Aside from the double-barrel shotgun, few firearms have had such a long history of use. Wild West gunslinger Wyatt Earp and modern-day New York lawman Jim Cirillo both used one in critical situations, and it held up well.

So the revolver is not outdated at all, it has stood the test of time. Although yes, the pistol is still more... "relevant" for modern shooters, and it is also constantly evolving into more convenient forms. But in any case, as a result of the use of lightweight aluminum frames and triggerless systems, one of the most popular types of concealed carry weapons is currently the 9mm revolver. Although, to be honest, this concept is not new at all.

Gunmakers have been squeezing 9mm and other semi-automatic pistol cartridges into revolvers for decades, creating many classics like the .45 ACP M1917. Moon magazines are the standard for revolvers in this caliber.


And this is how they are used to load pistol cartridges into a revolver cylinder!

In recent years, gunsmiths have created some excellent sport revolvers chambered for this cartridge. Competition shooters have especially benefited from the introduction of high-tech, well-designed revolvers to the market. Two such models come to mind are the Smith & Wesson PC Pro 986 and the Ruger GP100 Match Champion. However, concealed carry is not ignored by gunsmiths either. And although the choice of cartridges for such weapons is inferior to the revolver cartridges .357 Magnum and .38 Special, there are still options. That is why interest in 9mm revolvers continues to grow and their range is expanding. So, what is available to consumers of these weapons now? We will consider five options for 9mm revolvers suitable for concealed carry. And first among them is ...


Ruger LCR

With its matte-black frame and hornet's nest profile, this lightweight 9mm revolver (also available in .38 Spc. and .357 Mag.) isn't going to win any beauty contests. But it doesn't need to, because its sales record suggests that its appeal to buyers is based on such important factors as reliability and convenience, making it one of the most sought-after modern revolvers for self-defense.

The LCR's main advantage is its exceptional concealment, which few revolvers can match. Weighing just over 450 g empty, with a 4,5 cm barrel and an overall length of 16,5 cm, this revolver looks modest and is not at all bulky. Its frame is made of aviation aluminum, which means the material is strong enough to allow this revolver to serve as a backup weapon that can use semi-automatic pistol ammunition.

Despite the lightness of this five-shot revolver, it may feel clunky, but this is easily corrected with practice. The Ruger has a trigger pull of 4,5 pounds. And thanks to the use of clips, it reloads quickly. Overall, it deserves its place among the best 9mm revolvers. Price: $859.


Smith & Wesson PC Pro 986

Tradition, tradition, tradition… There’s no escaping them, so the design of this revolver is quite recognizable. Although, perhaps, this revolver does not quite correspond to the armed citizen’s idea of the ideal concealed 9mm revolver. The fact is that its cylinder holds not 5, but 7 rounds. By holding these 7 rounds in its capacious titanium cylinder, the 986 can compete with the capacity of many 9mm micro pistols that have become a hit in recent years. The frame is made of stainless steel. And the titanium alloy from which its cylinder is made allowed to reduce the weight of the revolver to 989 g without cartridges.

Foreign experts emphasize that this revolver is designed for competitions. In double-action mode, it works very smoothly and has a lighter trigger than most production models, which significantly increases its accuracy. The revolver works quickly thanks to the trigger travel limiter, which is very useful during rapid shooting. In addition, the revolver is equipped with an adjustable sight, which significantly increases accuracy.

But this revolver is still quite heavy and… expensive. Price — $1259. In addition, the sights and hammer spur can get stuck when extracting. That is, the "986" is good as a 9-mm revolver, surpassing many models in its class, but this weapon is not for everyone.


Charter Arms "Pitbull"

The US arms market also has a cartridge called .44 Smith & Wesson Special, also widely known as .44 S&W Special, .44 Special, .44 Spl, .44 Spc or 10,9×29 mm. This is a purely centerfire revolver cartridge with smokeless powder. Moreover, it was developed by Smith & Wesson back in 1907 and introduced in 1908. Well, if there is a cartridge, then there will always be a revolver for it.

The Bulldog became such a revolver for self-defense and concealed carry - a revolver developed by the founder of Charter Arms, Doug McClenahan, back in 1973. The name "Bulldog" was a tribute to the Webley revolvers of the same name. In the 1980s of the last century, it was the best-selling weapon in the United States, and it became the calling card of the Charter Arms company. By the mid-1980s, more than half a million units were produced, and each year this number increased by about 37 units. However, the production of "Bulldogs" has been suspended several times since 000 due to the company's bankruptcy.


Here it is, the famous "Bulldog" from the Charter Arms company.

Well, time flies, and there is a great desire to enter the market. So, another company, Charter Arms, decided to release something similar to the popular Bulldog, but in 9 mm caliber. That is how the Pitbull revolver appeared ten years ago!

Its creators have abandoned moon clips - full or half - in favor of spring extractors. The cartridge inserted into the cylinder of this revolver is simply clamped in the chamber and will remain until ejection, like a cartridge with a flange. It is believed that those who have dealt with moon clips, especially frequently used and warped ones, will appreciate the advantage of such a system. In addition, this feature makes the weapon compatible with belt loaders, which, although not the fastest, are among the most convenient.

All Charter Arms revolvers, starting with the Bulldog, use a trigger bar. The hammer strikes the trigger bar, which in turn strikes the firing pin, firing the round. The stainless steel finish is matte and sandblasted, the front sight is canted, the rear sight is integral, and the trigger is, of course, not polished. The hammer spur is rounded, which, with some skill, allows the hammer to be drawn without interference. The price of this 5-shot revolver is $520.


Rock Island Armory AL9.0

Interestingly, when it comes to Rock Island Armory, most people see it as a purely American company. However, it appeared in the States only in 1985, and was created in 1905 in the Philippines. The Rock Island Armory brand was simply bought by the Filipinos at that time. At first, the company produced 1911 Colts, but a few years ago, a universal 9-mm revolver joined the product line of this company, which is certainly suitable for defensive purposes. The AL9.0 drum holds 6 Parabellum rounds, and it is quickly reloaded using moon clips.

The downside of the AL9.0 is its size. Although its width of 3,80 mm and barrel length of 7,62 mm are more than acceptable, the revolver weighs 865 g without cartridges, which does not make it light. But overall, it is very comfortable to shoot, especially considering the already well-proven 9 mm caliber. It has a comfortable grip and an adjustable rear sight, although the latter raises questions. The only thing is that the AL9.0's trigger spur protrudes noticeably from the body. The price of the revolver is $899.


"Taurus" 905

The Brazilian company Taurus also makes 9mm revolvers. The 905 is considered to be a more than effective self-defense weapon, and it is user-friendly. Sure, this steel-frame revolver only has a five-round cylinder, but that is pretty standard for most concealed carry revolvers, regardless of caliber. The 905 compensates for this by being lighter and slightly narrower (3,5 cm) than other 9mm revolvers. It is also quite streamlined, with an integrated rear sight (with a slanted front), and all its edges are well-rounded.

The only downside, at least for some, is the trigger pull, although it’s not a deal breaker. Conveniently, the 905 uses Taurus Stellar Clips (and moon clips, too) to hold the rounds in place, a neat engineering solution that makes loading easier than traditional moon clips. Like any 9mm revolver that uses this type of loading, it’s quick to reload with practice. The only downside to the 905 is its hefty 5,5-pound double-action trigger pull. There’s a 905 with a concealed hammer, but it’s only available with a 76,2-inch barrel. It’s still a carry option, but it’s a shame the company didn’t make a similar model with a 5-inch barrel. The revolver retails for $410.
148 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    16 August 2025 04: 48
    Interesting article. To the author good

    But unfortunately it is not relevant for Russia. When we have some kind of rubber disgrace on a construction cartridge for 75 thousand. Although people there are puppyishly delighted for some reason negative And with the LLC license there is no choice either.
    Of course, you can go to a shooting range and shoot from some sports gear. But it's like with a woman of low social responsibility. It seems like the result has been achieved, but there is no satisfaction. recourse

    P.S. In the USSR I also had a chance to shoot from a Khaidurovsky (unfortunately I don’t remember the brand). And I even had a chance to hold a confiscated Nagant without cartridges.
    1. +7
      16 August 2025 05: 02
      Quote: Alexey_12
      Yes, hold the Nagant, confiscated without cartridges.

      Nagants were still in the VOKhR at strategically important enterprises 15 years ago. From personal experience I can say that this is a very accurate weapon when firing with a preliminary cocking. But there was a real problem with the cartridges for them; they stopped producing them in the late 1940s.
      1. +4
        16 August 2025 13: 38
        But there was a real problem with the cartridges for them; they stopped producing them in the late 1940s.

        The other day I was looking at some very fresh BPZ cartridges.
        1. 0
          16 August 2025 14: 47
          Quote: Kerensky
          The other day I was looking at some very fresh BPZ cartridges.

          What are they for? Most of the Nagants have long been disposed of.
          1. +2
            16 August 2025 14: 49
            What are they for? Most of the Nagants have long been disposed of.

            If there is demand, there will be supply. Maybe for export? For those who like...
            1. +1
              16 August 2025 15: 01
              Quote: Kerensky
              If there is demand, there will be supply. Maybe for export? For those who like...

              A very narrow market segment. There are very few award revolvers left in the Russian Federation. Given the specific design and characteristics, demand abroad is also minimal. These cartridges were in high demand more than 20 years ago, now there is no particular need for them.
              1. 0
                24 November 2025 00: 55
                At least the Serbs still produce Nagant cartridges. If my sclerosis doesn't fail me, then so does Fiocchi (I might be wrong, but someone else besides the Serbs definitely produces them).
                1. 0
                  11 December 2025 15: 41
                  And it's true, Partizan still produces cartridges, as well as cartridges with bullets for the Nagant (although I myself regard the Nagant as an example of corruption schemes)
      2. 0
        24 November 2025 00: 53
        Nagant cartridges were produced in Yurizan until 1989.
    2. -3
      16 August 2025 09: 54
      Quote: Alexey_12
      But it’s like with a woman of low social responsibility. It seems like the result has been achieved, but there is no satisfaction.

      I want to challenge your assertion... It is with a woman of low social responsibility that one can achieve satisfaction, but there will be no result, unless, of course, one uses contraceptives... feel
      1. +4
        16 August 2025 10: 02
        Well, if it gives you personal satisfaction, that's your potential.
        Quote: ROSS 42
        I want to challenge your statement.

        I'm not going to argue here.
        P.S. I have a ROHA. I don't go hunting much, but it's enough to maintain my skills. And the topic here is about short-barreled weapons.
      2. 0
        16 August 2025 13: 20
        Do normal women not give it?
        1. +3
          16 August 2025 14: 01
          Quote: Clever man
          Don't normal women give it?

          It is unclear to whom the question is addressed.
          Can a woman be called normal if she gives?
          I am less and less interested in women as an object of sexual intimacy. And it is recommended to challenge the statement if it is far from the truth...
          Yes, in two years my wife and I will celebrate our golden jubilee...
          Yes, the stupid learn from their own experience...
          Yes ...
          Quote: Alexey_12
          And the topic here is about short-barreled weapons.
  2. +4
    16 August 2025 04: 52
    I'm not an expert on light firearms at all, but here you have it all in one bottle. I read the article with pleasure, respect to the author
  3. +10
    16 August 2025 04: 53
    The revolver is a timeless weapon and remains highly prized.

    Personally, I don't need a semi-automatic pistol for everyday carry. But I wouldn't refuse a large-caliber double-action revolver with a stainless steel frame, intended exclusively for carrying in the taiga and while fishing. In the last decade, due to predatory logging and the extermination of salmon, there have been a lot of aggressive bears in the Far East, which can often be found near populated areas.
    1. +9
      16 August 2025 08: 39
      there have become a lot of aggressive bears
      - and also brainless motorists feed bears that come out onto the roads.....
      1. +10
        16 August 2025 09: 53
        Quote: faiver
        - and also brainless motorists feed bears that come out onto the roads.....

        And they spoil the animal, it eventually stops being afraid of people, becomes dangerous and dies.
    2. +4
      16 August 2025 08: 46
      Not every revolver will work reliably against a bear. 9 mm cannot be considered a reliable means against such a large animal.
      1. +3
        16 August 2025 09: 54
        Quote from solar
        Not every revolver will work reliably against a bear. 9 mm cannot be considered a reliable means against such a large animal.

        Minimum .357 Magnum with expanding bullet.
        1. +8
          16 August 2025 10: 34
          0.50, only 0.50! So that it knocks you off your feet!
          Good! hi
          1. +9
            16 August 2025 10: 43
            Quote: novel xnumx
            Best wishes! hi

            Hi!
            Quote: novel xnumx
            0.50, only 0.50! So that it knocks you off your feet!

            Considering that I weigh less than 70 kg, such a monster would most likely knock me off my feet with the recoil, and the bear would die laughing.
            1. +6
              16 August 2025 12: 29
              The bear will die laughing.

              So, the task is completed, and you can always get up
              1. +3
                16 August 2025 14: 49
                Quote: novel xnumx
                So, the task is completed, and you can always get up

                But that's not certain. I'd prefer that the beast be stopped by a shot, or at least by several shots, rather than me being knocked down by the recoil.
            2. +2
              16 August 2025 13: 35
              Considering that I weigh less than 70 kg
              - Sergey, have you tried eating it? bully
              1. +10
                16 August 2025 14: 54
                Quote: faiver
                Sergey, have you tried eating it?

                Andrey, I'm not much away from turning 60, but I can move around the forest and the river no worse than guys who are 15 years younger than me. Considering that our family's income level is above average, we eat well. But I try to limit myself in food and move more. With a height of 173 cm, I weigh 68 kg, and I am quite comfortable.
                1. +2
                  20 August 2025 14: 58
                  considering the age of 60, no longer a youthful metabolism, excellent height to weight ratio.
        2. +2
          16 August 2025 17: 59
          Remembering the good old days...
          https://topwar.ru/177092-medvezhij-korotkostvol.html
          :))
          1. +2
            17 August 2025 12: 35
            Quote from solar
            Remembering the good old days...
            https://topwar.ru/177092-medvezhij-korotkostvol.html
            :))

            It seemed to me that everyone had long forgotten this publication.
            1. +7
              17 August 2025 12: 38
              It seemed to me that everyone had long forgotten this publication.

              Not all :))
              1. +2
                17 August 2025 12: 38
                Quote from solar
                Not all :))

                drinks
        3. +3
          17 August 2025 17: 01
          The .454 Casull is specially designed against bears. The .357 Magnum is essentially a .38 Special cartridge with a heavier bullet and a larger powder charge and a 4 mm longer case. It is excessive against a human carcass, but too small and weak against a bear, an expansive bullet will open in the fat and the kinetic energy will not be enough to drop the animal (unless in the head). So if possible, a revolver chambered for .454 Casull or 45LC. True, the recoil wassat With my 60 kg weight I shot from a Ruger, which is Alaskan, brutal.
          1. 0
            17 August 2025 17: 33
            There is also the topic of finishing off the beast or the control shot.
      2. +2
        16 August 2025 15: 32
        Yes, all this is actually a myth. If you dig around, you can find a study in the USSR about bear attacks. Well, a 9mm Luger is quite reliable in killing them, even with a revolver they fought back much more often than they died. If you managed to put 6-8 bullets into a carcass at close range - the bear will feel bad, he is not a terminator and does not have a bulletproof vest. And a person, as a rule, has such time, fortunately it is literally a few seconds.
        PS https://dzen.ru/a/ZgjzAQJ_gE-DwDn9
        PSS But, yes - only .45ACP is GUARANTEED to help
        1. 0
          17 August 2025 07: 47
          And the most important thing in a revolver is reliability and readiness. Because there is no safety catch and it is not needed. In a critical situation, this is important. Misfires are not dangerous.
    3. IVZ
      0
      16 August 2025 08: 48
      But I wouldn’t refuse a large-caliber double-action revolver with a stainless steel frame, intended exclusively for carrying in the taiga and while fishing.
      Sorry, just a professional interest, but wouldn't a compact 12-gauge double-barreled sawed-off shotgun work for these purposes? I know that such weapons are also prohibited.
      1. +5
        16 August 2025 09: 56
        Quote: IVZ
        Sorry, just a professional interest, but wouldn't a compact 12-gauge double-barreled sawed-off shotgun work for these purposes? I know that such weapons are also prohibited.

        I would prefer a compact multi-shot rifled weapon. I met a man who took a shortened pump to the river, but it was heavy and cumbersome to carry around.
      2. +7
        16 August 2025 10: 16
        Well, 5-6-7 rounds are definitely better than two...
      3. 0
        16 August 2025 14: 07
        Double-barreled short smoothbore guns are available for sale.
        MP-43KN, Huglu HRZ.

        People don't go hunting with revolvers or pistols. For obvious reasons.
        First of all, a weak cartridge and the lack of a buttstock.
    4. -3
      16 August 2025 09: 41
      So why make those bears even angrier by scratching their skin with a revolver???
      Sometimes a couple of expansion rounds from an SKS don't stop you, but you want a revolver?
      Doubtful.
      1. +5
        16 August 2025 10: 00
        Quote: garri-lin
        So why make those bears even angrier by scratching their skin with a revolver???

        Make me angry? You think I shoot at every animal I see? This is strictly self-defense in emergency situations.
        Quote: garri-lin
        Sometimes a couple of expansion rounds from an SKS don't stop you, but you want a revolver?

        If I had my way, I would ban the SKS for hunting altogether. It leaves too many wounded animals behind. And you can doubt anything, but there are reliable statistics on the use of large-caliber revolvers for self-defense against bears in Alaska.
      2. 0
        16 August 2025 15: 41
        The muzzle energy of the SKS at 300 m is not much higher than that of the 9x19 at 3 m. But at three meters, in case of immediate danger, the entire clip will most likely fly into the animal, and not a couple of bullets from a long distance.
    5. 0
      16 August 2025 09: 48
      Quote: Bongo
      In the last decade, the Far East has seen a rise in the number of aggressive bears due to predatory logging and the extermination of salmon.

      It's a pity that bears can't be harvested sad but a concealed carry revolver might come in handy smile
      1. +1
        16 August 2025 10: 48
        Quote: aybolyt678
        It's a pity that bears can't be harvested

        Almost no one hunts bears specifically, and about 30% of adult animals are infected with trichinosis.
        Quote: aybolyt678
        but a concealed carry revolver might come in handy

        I am categorically against concealed carry, only open carry and outside populated areas.
        1. 0
          16 August 2025 19: 49
          Quote: Bongo
          Quote: aybolyt678
          It's a pity that bears can't be harvested

          Almost no one hunts bears specifically, and about 30% of adult animals are infected with trichinosis.
          If only ...
          In China bear paws delicacy - and in the Far East poachers kill bears just for the sake of bear paws, which are smuggled into China.
          1. 0
            17 August 2025 12: 31
            Quote: cat Rusich
            In China, bear paws are a delicacy - and in the Far East, poachers kill bears just for their paws, which they smuggle into China.

            What region do you permanently reside in?
            I mean that your information is about ten years out of date. At present, China has very strict penalties for importing contraband products of animal origin and the demand for bear paws has practically disappeared.
    6. +1
      16 August 2025 12: 10
      But I wouldn't refuse a large-caliber double-action revolver with a stainless steel frame, intended exclusively for carrying in the taiga and while fishing.

      Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan. Exactly as you described. Calibers .44 Magnum, .454 Casull/.45 Colt and .480 Ruger. Length is only 194 mm. True, the weight is 1,5 kg without cartridges. But it has been tested in practice. Grizzly lays down. And it is not expensive - 1420 dollars.
      1. +1
        16 August 2025 14: 57
        Quote: Nikname2025
        Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan. Exactly as you described. Calibers .44 Magnum, .454 Casull/.45 Colt and .480 Ruger. Length is only 194 mm. True, the weight is 1,5 kg without cartridges. But it has been tested in practice. Grizzly lays down. And it is not expensive - 1420 dollars.

        Hello! Perhaps you have already read this:
        Bearish short trunk
        https://topwar.ru/177092-medvezhij-korotkostvol.html
        1. +2
          16 August 2025 15: 23
          I read it. I even wrote comments. But it was a long time ago. I forgot about it. As compensation, I can recommend the Smith & Wesson Model 629 DELUXE 3" BARREL for .44 Magnum or .44 S&W Special, which is not in your article. It is lighter and cheaper. The recoil is quite bearable. However, I weigh 110 kg.
          1. 0
            16 August 2025 15: 28
            Quote: Nikname2025
            I read it. I even wrote comments.

            I thought so.
            Quote: Nikname2025
            As compensation, I can recommend the Smith & Wesson Model 629 DELUXE 3" BARREL in .44 Magnum or .44 S&W Special, which is not in your article.

            I wouldn't refuse such guns for trips to the taiga, but alas, this is not available to me. Although I have quite a small arsenal at home.
            1. 0
              16 August 2025 15: 55
              I can't do it

              Instead of a revolver, you can carry a couple of flash-bang grenades like "Fakel" or "Zarya". Or better yet, GSZ-Sh. No bear can withstand them.
              1. +1
                17 August 2025 12: 33
                Quote: Nikname2025
                Instead of a revolver, you can carry a couple of flash-bang grenades like "Fakel" or "Zarya". Or better yet, GSZ-Sh. No bear can withstand them.

                Well, I haven't come across any special means in free circulation. I carry a flare and a plastic airsoft grenade filled with pepper and tobacco.
    7. 0
      16 August 2025 16: 19
      A revolver is reliable :). But looking at it from the outside, nothing better than Detective Special has been invented. Reliable, elegant, deadly.
    8. 0
      16 August 2025 19: 30
      Hello to you. I was given this .44 caliber. Smith and Wesson Russian. It seems to be the best for a bear....:)
      1. +1
        17 August 2025 19: 05
        Is that when a bear accidentally bumps into you with his shoulder in a saloon and you challenge him to a midday duel or something?))
        1. 0
          18 August 2025 04: 59
          "Is that when a bear accidentally bumps into you with his shoulder in a saloon and you challenge him to a midday duel or something?))"
          "Subtly, in a foreign way" :)
          Although, this is just simple envy on your part. :)
    9. 0
      11 December 2025 15: 43
      And here you are right, for "finishing off" the best thing is to have a revolver, maybe chambered for a cartridge based on the AK case, in 30 mm, caliber somewhere around 10 mm
  4. +4
    16 August 2025 05: 15
    The Ruger LCR is certainly good...light, comfortable, concealable...you can even hide it in your jacket sleeve...you won't see it and it won't catch on anything.
    I wouldn't refuse something like this for self-defense... but alas... the government is afraid of our citizens... what if something happens.
    1. IVZ
      +4
      16 August 2025 08: 38
      The state is afraid of our citizens...what if something happens?
      I don't know about the state, but I, a citizen of this state, who has been dealing with weapons all my adult life, am really afraid. Example. A friend of mine is being bullied by a scumbag - a drunkard - a neighbor in the village. A healthy, boorish creature - a security guard with a weapons permit. He is rude, steals, practically robs, raises his hands. A friend dreams of legalizing handguns for protection. I ask: "Will your neighbor refuse to buy a gun? And what happens if he uses the weapon first. The defender always shoots second, and in your situation everything will end after the first." I was not convinced. I noticed from my friends who bought a traumatic weapon - a gun changes people. The barrel in the pocket - the jaw forward, a condescending - patronizing tone, the expectation of adventure in the eyes. True, it passes with time. Handguns should be allowed, but it is necessary to develop a mechanism for society to adapt to this permission. But how is this dangerous personally for government officials? It seems a bit vague.
      1. +5
        16 August 2025 10: 24
        But how is this dangerous personally for government officials?
        - regular lynching, I still remember the statements of some officials to the faces of disabled guys after both Chechen wars - "I didn't send you there"...
        1. 0
          14 December 2025 12: 29
          "I didn't send you there"... a surprisingly old story, especially from the lips of bureaucrats.... It's like, the Motherland calls, but on the distribution, it's something completely different...
      2. 0
        16 August 2025 13: 49
        Short-barreled weapons should be permitted, but a mechanism for society to adapt to this permission must be developed.

        I am against concealed carry weapons. But I am in full support of selling Mosin-Nagant rifles to the population, with two certificates (not a psychopath and not in "heavy" prison terms), and posting bail. And in populated areas, - with a fixed bayonet.
        1. +5
          16 August 2025 13: 53
          Quote: Kerensky
          And in populated areas, it is obligatory with a fixed bayonet.

          Now imagine a suburban train in the morning. Students are going to classes, people are going to work. It's not even big enough to let an apple fall on the train, it's even big enough to let a fly fly through. And everyone is carrying rifles, with fixed bayonets... belay
          1. +3
            16 August 2025 14: 23
            Students go to classes, people go to work.

            Wow! According to the law of natural laziness: everyone is proud of a powerful firearm, but to carry it around? No way (on the second week of ownership)...
            1. -1
              16 August 2025 14: 28
              Quote: Kerensky
              According to the law of natural laziness

              According to this law - I simply won't buy it (her). And I'm not the only one, IMHO.
              1. +1
                16 August 2025 14: 30
                According to this law - I simply won't buy it. And I'm not the only one, IMHO.

                Well, no one is at a loss...
          2. +4
            17 August 2025 19: 07
            And it's quiet on the train, no one swears, everyone is polite... laughing
          3. 0
            29 November 2025 16: 05
            And crossed ribbons from Maximka on the chest
      3. +1
        17 August 2025 08: 02
        That's the point, for two weeks. Then a person understands that it's just extra weight and a big responsibility and doesn't carry it around all the time. But at night, when going to the garage or to the forest, why not take it? Anything can happen.
        1. +1
          17 August 2025 19: 12
          The probability of running into a drunken redneck is much less than getting hit in the head from behind. Constant training is needed here, physical and psychological, otherwise any weapon, with the exception of a stool leg, is a greater danger to the owner.
      4. +1
        17 August 2025 09: 26
        Quote: IVZ
        Short barrels should be allowed

        No need. No need to drag Wild West methods into modern life. Especially since it's all being done covertly at the instigation of arms capitalists. Who basically don't care about the consequences, as long as they make money.
        1. IVZ
          +2
          17 August 2025 09: 58
          There is no need to drag Wild West methods into modern life.
          Permission for handguns does not mean dragging the methods of the Wild West. But the corresponding preparation of the legislative base and the formation of a social base, and this is a long and difficult path, would allow to some extent to solve some problems associated with, for example, the criminal component of migration (there will be no radical solutions anyway) and I know from experience - a weapon, in the hands of an experienced user, increases the degree of his civic self-awareness. The main thing is to prevent the barrels from falling into the wrong hands. If this is possible ... Although personally I doubt it and am also "against", at least in the foreseeable future.
          1. 0
            17 August 2025 10: 09
            Quote: IVZ
            would allow to some extent to solve some problems associated, for example, with the criminal component of migration

            So you're suggesting treating the symptoms, not the disease itself? I think you should understand what that entails.
            1. IVZ
              0
              17 August 2025 10: 10
              I am not suggesting, but I am assuming that the disease will not be cured radically.
              1. +1
                17 August 2025 10: 12
                Quote: IVZ
                I am not suggesting, but I am assuming that the disease will not be cured radically.

                And short-barreled weapons will not be allowed for the same reason. And although this reason is frankly disgusting, it is still the right decision.
          2. +3
            17 August 2025 10: 11
            Quote: IVZ
            The main thing is to prevent the guns from falling into the wrong hands.

            As for me, it’s easier to decide

            Quote: IVZ
            some problems associated, for example, with the criminal component of migration

            It is enough to simply close down the "left" legalization of migrants. This is certainly easier than sifting out "experienced" (and in fact - sane and responsible) "users" from those who are not.
            1. IVZ
              0
              17 August 2025 10: 14
              If it were "simple", it would have been closed long ago. If the problem is not solved, it means that "People" are lobbying for it or it is simply profitable at the moment.
              1. +1
                17 August 2025 10: 16
                Quote: IVZ
                If only it were "easy"

                Technically, if you have registration databases (and they exist), this is not difficult.

                Quote: IVZ
                If a problem is not solved, it means that it is lobbied by "People" or it is simply profitable at the moment

                Exactly Yes

                But you propose to solve this problem by creating (potentially) an even bigger one. Which is what I pointed out to you above.
                1. IVZ
                  0
                  17 August 2025 10: 20
                  Perhaps. But I focused on educating society and improving the legislative base to the appropriate level, and this still needs to be done regardless of the goals pursued.
                  1. +1
                    17 August 2025 10: 24
                    Quote: IVZ
                    I focused on educating society and improving the legislative framework to the appropriate level

                    I see. Then - not in this life. Nobody now, in their right mind and memory, will start "educating society and improving legislation" under the legalization of handguns. It was not in the USSR - it will not be in the Russian Federation. IMHO, yes.
  5. +1
    16 August 2025 08: 13
    "Although his width 3,80 mm and barrel length 7,62 mm more than acceptable, the weight of the revolver without cartridges is 865 g, which does not make it light."
    winked Aha... - super thin and super short AL9.0! A miracle happened...! request
  6. +4
    16 August 2025 08: 42
    So, let's take a look at the best 9mm revolvers for everyday carry.

    Of the revolvers under consideration, the only one that makes sense to consider for everyday carry is the Ruger LCR. Carrying around a weight of more than half a kilogram is no fun, let alone one weighing more than a kilogram.
    The main problem with any weapon is that it may not be there when you need it simply because you are tired of carrying it around. :((
  7. +2
    16 August 2025 09: 03
    I shot a Nagant at one time, it's a cool device
  8. 0
    16 August 2025 10: 04
    And where can you buy such a revolver...And what can it be useful for in Russia?
    The law on self-defense, which could rehabilitate the defender, works in defense of the attacker. A person has no right to defend himself with such a revolver from an alabai or any other free-roaming aggressive animal that has attacked him. At home, it is an extra hassle and a problem to store...
    We can see variations of its use in American cinema, and in Russia even the same
    Quote: Alexey_12
    rubber shame on a construction cartridge

    may turn out to be an aggravating object, just like a stun gun or pepper spray...
    hi
    1. +1
      17 August 2025 08: 06
      The man has nothing to do with it. You are even guilty before the bear. God forbid, our law enforcement officers, going crazy, find out that you hurt a bear. You will have no end of problems. You need to get permission from Moscow to shoot every Kosolapov who attacks a person. And there are "ecologists" there. They have only seen bears in funny videos.
  9. +1
    16 August 2025 10: 31
    Vyacheslav Olegovich! Thank you for an interesting review for a simple VO reader!

    "The downside of the AL9.0 is its size. Although its width of 3,80 mm and barrel length of 7,62 mm are more than acceptable, the weight of the revolver without cartridges is 865 g, which does not make it light. ..."

    There is probably a mistake about the width.
    1. 0
      16 August 2025 14: 15
      Quote from Fangaro

      There is probably a mistake about the width.

      There are simply mm printed instead of cm, or the comma is in the wrong place.
  10. +1
    16 August 2025 10: 42
    and in Russia even the same [quote=Алексей_12]rubber disgrace on a construction cartridge[/quote]
    may turn out to be an aggravating object, just like a stun gun or pepper spray...
    hi[/ Quote]

    In our country, even beating up three attacking thugs with a huge branch from a felled tree, if someone has a fracture, can be considered exceeding the limits...

    But this does not mean that reading about civilian concealed carry firearms in other countries is not interesting.
    Just as it doesn't mean that everything is bad for us and everything is good for them. And vice versa is also true.
  11. +1
    16 August 2025 10: 46
    Having a weight of more than half a kilogram with you at all times is quite a pleasure, let alone specimens weighing more than a kilogram.
    The main problem with any weapon is that it may not be there when you need it simply because you are tired of carrying it around. :(([/quote]

    The weight of everything you carry always gets in the way. Even your phone. Even your apartment keys.
    1. 0
      16 August 2025 14: 20
      Quote from Fangaro

      The weight of everything you carry always gets in the way. Even your phone. Even your apartment keys.

      What is important is how this weight lies on the body. If it does not restrict movement and you do not feel it on the body, then it is not so much of a hindrance. Another thing is that it is inconvenient to carry keys or a mobile phone in a backpack, and the backpack itself can be restrictive and prevent the skin from breathing.
    2. +2
      16 August 2025 22: 00
      A phone and keys are an inevitable evil, you use them several times a day. You can't say the same about a revolver. Of course, there are service weapons with a high probability of their use, where weight is less important. But if you have a revolver "just in case", then very soon you will get tired of dragging it around with you.
      1. -1
        16 August 2025 22: 03
        Quote from solar
        Phone and keys are an inevitable evil, you use them several times a day.

        I hardly ever use my phone, and never use my mobile phone because I don’t have one.
  12. +2
    16 August 2025 10: 48
    Quote: sub307
    "Although his width 3,80 mm and barrel length 7,62 mm more than acceptable, the weight of the revolver without cartridges is 865 g, which does not make it light."
    winked Aha... - super thin and super short AL9.0! A miracle happened...! request

    And why such sarcasm?
    You noticed it first? Well, write that maybe there is a mistake "here".
  13. +1
    16 August 2025 10: 59
    The barrel in the pocket - the jaw forward, condescending - patronizing tone, the expectation of adventure in the eyes. True, it passes with time. Short-barreled weapons should be allowed, but it is necessary to develop a mechanism for society to adapt to this permission. But how is this dangerous personally for government officials? It seems somehow vague.[/quote]

    In the news on 20 major TV channels about how in the country, in the six months of permitted carrying of civilian firearms, more than 500 thousand citizens have died and more than 800 thousand citizens have been convicted, citizens may become more polite.
    You are right that having something in your pocket that gives you an advantage over others can not only reduce your fear levels, but also boost your self-esteem.
    1. +2
      16 August 2025 22: 02
      can not only reduce the level of fear, but also exalt self-esteem.

      And to stimulate provocation of conflict with the possible use of weapons.
    2. 0
      17 August 2025 08: 09
      Where is this? 500 thousand on SVO do not die in a year.
      What the hell...
    3. 0
      17 August 2025 14: 53
      jaw forward, condescending - patronizing tone, anticipation of adventure in the eyes.

      This also applies to many owners of certain dog breeds.
      To those who bought baseball bats (and not only them) and get out of the car with them seeing that the pedestrian has nothing.
      To healthy foreheads that started going to various martial arts sections.
      Drunken companies of more than two people.
      The list could be even longer.
  14. +1
    16 August 2025 11: 28
    Quote: faiver
    But how is this dangerous personally for government officials?
    - regular lynching, I still remember the statements of some officials to the faces of disabled guys after both Chechen wars - "I didn't send you there"...


    Do you sincerely believe that all officials spoke like that to those who served in the DRA and to those who defended the integrity of the Russian Federation for the first and second time?
    Someone definitely blurted that out. It wasn't a smart and self-confident official.
    And how did the majority of bureaucrats differ from the soldiers, traders, politicians, journalists, co-operators, workers, engineers, plant directors, ship captains, and policemen? By the location of their workplace. And "it is necessary to do well" was the same for everyone in the country. Starting from "don't pronounce the name of THIS", to again rains and there will be little potatoes, in the 7th workshop there is MGTF, we have solder, but the military representative will not receive harnesses.
  15. 0
    16 August 2025 11: 59
    Its frame is made of aircraft-grade aluminum.

    The Ruger LCR revolver has an aluminum-zinc alloy frame only in .22 LR, .22 Magnum, and .38 Spl +P. The .357 Magnum, 9mm Luger, and .327 Federal Magnum calibers have alloy steel frames.
  16. +2
    16 August 2025 12: 09
    I will ask a provocative question to those discussing the issue of owning a handgun. How often would you personally (unknown people or some characters from TV) living in the "philistine" mode (not hunting and military actions) benefit from owning such a weapon? I will tell you about myself. I do not remember a situation when potential ownership of a pistol would make my life easier.
    1. 0
      16 August 2025 13: 40
      Quote: balabol
      I'll tell about myself

      similarly... I respect revolvers very much as a "toy" and a model of technology, but I have never seen any benefit from real use (except for complications)... owning a Japanese or Filipino short stick is much more effective (and safer), although it requires more training than at a shooting range... a real firearm is no good as a "scarecrow", you have to be prepared for both the shot and its consequences
      1. +2
        16 August 2025 15: 32
        I once read Louis L'Amour (a classic of Westerns). He has quite a lot of thoughts about gun ownership, naturally based on North American reality. The rule of a Colt owner is: don't draw your gun unless you plan to shoot, don't shoot unless you plan to kill. Is everyone ready for that? And that's the rule of survival in an armed society.
        1. -1
          16 August 2025 16: 17
          Quote: balabol
          The Colt owner's rule is: don't draw your gun unless you plan to shoot, don't shoot unless you plan to kill.

          !
          that's exactly what I meant... but it's said in such a way that there's no more to say
    2. +2
      16 August 2025 18: 31
      Personally, twice for me. The first time, Lengas was walking around its property and found gas bubbles in one lake (puddle). We looked at the map and saw our valves and the gas pipeline from it was also ours. Of course, we tried to write off that it was marsh gases. But then we had to go and see. Well, we were walking along the gas pipeline and a pack of dogs attacked us. Not such small dogs, a colleague had a wasp, but after the first shot it misfired. However, this was enough for us to run to the railway tracks and climb onto the platforms standing there, the dogs could not climb. And I am not sure that four charges of the wasp were enough to 100% eliminate the threat. The second time was after they closed the old queue and began to sell off the remaining objects - hangars, a diesel locomotive depot, garages, warehouses. Owners and tenants appeared. And one day, someone was preparing bath brooms and saw an illegal connection to our electrical cabinet. Well, they sent me with a young guy from the electrical shop. I have learned from bitter experience, I say let the security go with us and generally we need to call the police. But they said there is enough security, they will wait for you at our place. When they arrived, there was no security, and five tanned guys were rummaging around in a box. In short, the tanned guys came at us and two more showed up behind us and they all had something metal in their hands. Luckily, a security guard came with a weapon (they are a unit of the Russian Guard) and the tanned guys ran away.
      1. -1
        16 August 2025 20: 52
        The article was viewed by 13 thousand people, let's say 10% made it to the comments. You are the first to justify "it would be nice to have". But would you carry a gun at work? With dogs, okay. And with "tanned" people, if someone was shot, would that make your life easier? And to clean up the consequences? Or could you have foreseen it and immediately gone with the security guards. Well, I don't know how, but not to get into a dangerous situation?
        Life in a big city (for example) is also full of potential conflicts. St. Petersburg in the 60s, 70s, or 90s was no gift. Without thinking, you could easily get into trouble.
        1. +1
          16 August 2025 21: 34
          You forgot to mention that the guard had a weapon and this immediately simplified the situation, dramatically. At work, on the site itself, I have no right to carry a weapon, but there is nothing threatening me, outside the site I did not refuse.
          About the consequences.
          Zaur Karimov, an Azerbaijani national who spent three years in jail for the death of a young man, was suddenly released despite being sentenced to 11 years in a maximum security penal colony.
          Read on WWW.SPB.KP.RU: https://www.spb.kp.ru/daily/27558/4883231/
          You tell me, the guy got into a dangerous situation himself.
          Agree, not everyone is ready to talk like this about situations that nobody knows how they ended. Plus you forgot to mention that most of the commentators are elderly people from the USSR and most of them had nothing to take away in the "holy" 90s and even now there is no wealth.
          1. 0
            16 August 2025 23: 06
            I don't take it upon myself to judge anyone.
            Your answer fully meets the conditions of the micro survey. But so far you are the only one "For", my vote "Against" is also one. Not a super representative survey.
            By the way, if the readers are now about 70 years old, then in the 90s they were 40-year-old men, quite capable of getting into conflict situations.
            1. 0
              17 August 2025 14: 49
              Quote: balabol
              My vote is "against", also one. Not a super representative poll.

              I supported you: "I have never seen any benefit from real use (except complications)"... not super representative attentiveness :)
              1. -1
                17 August 2025 16: 53
                Pardon me, so those against the handgun permit win by collecting twice as many votes.
        2. +1
          17 August 2025 08: 14
          In the taiga, gamekeepers approach people to check and no one gets rowdy. Because after the 90s, gamekeepers shoot without thinking much. So all the riffraff will be extremely polite. And it will immediately become clear that they have nothing to do with it and are generally the best friend of any inspectors.
      2. -1
        16 August 2025 22: 22
        There was no security when they arrived, and five tanned men were rummaging around in the box. In short, the tanned men came at us.

        It makes sense in such a situation not to go to the box, but to call the police or security from afar and wait for them to arrive.
        1. 0
          17 August 2025 09: 15
          I see that you know where and how the box was located, where it can be seen from and many other things, since you give advice.
          1. 0
            17 August 2025 12: 32
            You omitted this detail, which is important for understanding the situation, under the phrase
            In a word

            that's why I didn't give any advice, especially to you personally, in your specific situation, but I just wrote how to generally logically act in such cases.
            It makes sense in this situation.
            1. 0
              17 August 2025 14: 48
              I am glad that you have admitted that you have no information on that case. Your advice, and I regard it as advice (whatever you write) is inappropriate.
  17. +1
    16 August 2025 12: 27
    The Ruger LCR has a variant called the Ruger LCRx with a "classic" trigger.
  18. +1
    16 August 2025 12: 55
    The downside of the AL9.0 is its size. Although its width of 3,80 mm and barrel length of 7,62 mm are more than acceptable

    Looks like a typo, they probably meant centimeters. But it looks funny. smile
  19. 0
    16 August 2025 14: 06
    What is the advantage of revolvers over pistols?
    A more powerful cartridge?
    1. 0
      16 August 2025 14: 12
      the very first thing that lies on the surface is reliability, since reloading distortions are excluded
    2. 0
      16 August 2025 20: 06
      Quote: Eisenfaust
      What is the advantage of revolvers over pistols?
      ?
      In modern double-action revolvers (you don't need to cock the hammer before shooting) - you can make the "first shot" without preparation - take it out and shoot, with a pistol, the owner will most likely have to pull the bolt or remove the safety catch, or both - seconds are lost that decide the outcome of the fight.
      1. 0
        16 August 2025 22: 25
        with a pistol, the owner will most likely have to pull the bolt or remove the safety catch, or both

        In modern pistols it is not necessary.
        In modern double-action revolvers (you don't need to cock the hammer before firing) - you can fire the "first shot" without preparation

        When firing with a self-cocking mechanism, accuracy suffers.
        1. 0
          16 August 2025 23: 33
          Quote from solar

          In modern double-action revolvers (you don't need to cock the hammer before firing) - you can fire the "first shot" without preparation

          When firing with a self-cocking mechanism, accuracy suffers.
          In the case of self defense you will have to shoot "point-blank", most likely into the body, from a distance of 2-3 meters, just in case of delay, the enemy will overcome this distance and get to the defender.
          Accuracy will be needed when shooting by the limbs - but for this there needs to be a sufficient distance of 5 meters.
        2. 0
          17 August 2025 08: 17
          In critical situations, few will be able to pull the trigger correctly. Everyone will jerk. So here, whether it's a revolver self-cocking or a Glock striker, it's all the same.
          In this sense, single-action revolvers are still in fashion in America. With the ability to use the other hand, you get an extremely accurate and rapid-fire thing.
          1. 0
            17 August 2025 12: 37
            I have a "rubber-barreled" revolver based on the Ruger, I compared the options, when cocking the gun, the barrel "goes away", especially with a quick shot, when you don't have time to steady your hand.
            1. 0
              17 August 2025 17: 31
              Yes, with any self-cocking the barrel will go away under stress. And in a pistol there should also be a cartridge in the chamber, the safety must be removed and you will still pull it. Because for safety the trigger is still 3-4 kg. You can shoot from a holster or from a pocket with a revolver. As long as nothing interferes with the trigger.
              I watched Goblin's videos with Mikhail, I don't remember his last name. He served his entire term in the police in the US. He says that they teach shooting very well. They can teach anyone. And still, the police shoot in the open when there's trouble. They hit anywhere, but not the criminal. Psychology in shooting is more important than any pistols, revolvers, and other things that amateurs love. As they say in the Wild West: "If six aren't enough, thirty-six won't be enough."
              By the way, there are even pistols with only a self-cocking trigger. They justify this by saying that the trigger is always the same and this teaches a person to handle the trigger more normally.
              1. 0
                19 August 2025 10: 41
                Pistols use a pre-cocking, this is not the same as a revolver's self-cocking. I shot from a Glock with a pre-cocking (the striker is cocked, and reloading is separate) the trigger pull is noticeably less. They write that the Glock has 2,5 kg. In addition, it is divided into two stages - first pre-cocking, then the trigger, the finger feels it.
                1. 0
                  19 August 2025 14: 23
                  Yes, it's all clear, but... Stress... First 3.5 kg, then 2.5. At the shooting range - no problem. If you see a bear, 99% will forget about handling the descent.
                  1. 0
                    19 August 2025 22: 53
                    The trigger release is 2,5 kg, and the trigger itself is very easy.
    3. 0
      17 August 2025 12: 40
      In case of a misfire, there is the possibility of quickly firing the next shot.
    4. 0
      18 August 2025 22: 17
      The fact that there is no extraction of the cartridge case after firing... hi
      And without a cartridge case it's harder to find you... bully
  20. 0
    16 August 2025 14: 26
    I was interested in the name of the cocking lever - "spur".
    Yes, it should catch when removed from clothing, but it was most likely called a spur because its original design resembled one - a toothed wheel on a leg.
    If you restore the wheel, the probability of snagging will be less. Why don't they do it?
  21. 0
    16 August 2025 14: 45
    Quote: IVZ
    Short-barreled weapons should be permitted, but a mechanism for society to adapt to this permission must be developed.

    They could, for starters, allow hunters who own long-barreled rifles.
  22. +2
    16 August 2025 15: 54
    Q7HELLO from Argentina.
    32 caliber, five in the drum, no hassle with 9mm...
    If he doesn't save me right away....who cares about the ability to quickly reboot him....
    Well, take my word for it:), "saved".
  23. 0
    16 August 2025 18: 28
    .38 Special (a popular revolver cartridge) is designated in the metric system as 9×29 mm R and 9.1×29 mm R. The equally popular .357 Magnum is a demidolated .38 Special with a 32,8 mm case length, i.e. +10% powder. This is in response to the question in the article about "9 mm revolvers".
    You can stuff a .357 Special into a .38 Magnum revolver for fun, which many do - the recoil is less. No one in their right mind, given the availability of branded rimmed ammunition for revolvers, would use surrogate rimless 9 mm Luger and other pistol cartridges, unless they are poor and have legal restrictions, because to reload them you have to make special clips, store them and carry them somewhere, and eventually lose them for fun.

    And yes, in all revolvers - except for the Nagant - there is a gap between the cylinder and the barrel, from which flame and other gases shoot out as derivatives of the shot. The finger phalanx suffers, evil tongues say that with powerful calibers it is torn off. They are lying, of course. drinks
  24. +2
    16 August 2025 22: 52
    Quote: guest
    Quote from solar
    Phone and keys are an inevitable evil, you use them several times a day.

    I hardly ever use my phone, and never use my mobile phone because I don’t have one.


    Is this a form of sarcasm?!
    I don't use a smartphone, my desktop computer is inside a closed network, and I sent a comment on VO via telegram. That's why it was published here.

    Maybe you've never eaten chicken skin?
    1. -1
      16 August 2025 22: 59
      Quote from Fangaro
      a desktop computer inside a closed network

      I never denied having a desktop computer, and I am writing from it now.
  25. 0
    16 August 2025 23: 02
    Quote from solar
    can not only reduce the level of fear, but also exalt self-esteem.

    And to stimulate provocation of conflict with the possible use of weapons.


    Yes. You are right. Having a weapon, even a stick, adds self-confidence. But it adds where there is no longer a fight for life, but a fight for the title has appeared.
  26. +1
    16 August 2025 23: 10
    Quote: guest
    Quote from Fangaro
    a desktop computer inside a closed network

    I never denied having a desktop computer, and I am writing from it now.


    If you really have never used a mobile phone, I apologize! I sincerely believed that even the usual push-button ones were used by almost everyone who had a computer and could receive and send text typed on a keyboard connected to that computer.

    Are you kidding?! Or are you an isolationist, but it's interesting to see what happens outside of self-isolation?
    1. -1
      16 August 2025 23: 19
      Actually, I only wrote about a mobile phone, I have a regular phone of course, although I rarely use it, mostly I talk to my parents. I don't see the point in carrying a phone around with me everywhere. Quite often I see people walking down the street staring at this phone, not paying much attention to what's going on around them, and sometimes something can happen.
  27. -1
    17 August 2025 00: 12
    Quote: guest
    Actually, I only wrote about a mobile phone, I have a regular phone of course, although I rarely use it, mostly I talk to my parents. I don't see the point in carrying a phone around with me everywhere. Quite often I see people walking down the street staring at this phone, not paying much attention to what's going on around them, and sometimes something can happen.


    When people walk, staring at their phones, it's about smartphones. There you can send SMS, read the news, and look at a map if you don't know how to get to your destination.
    A mobile phone is when you don’t have games, city maps, or a newspaper on the screen, but you have the ability to call your parents from another city, answer your son’s call, call an ambulance if the old man was walking, fell, and doesn’t move.
    You don't have to take your phone with you if you're going for a short time, you can turn off the ringer, leaving it on vibrate...
    But it is fundamental not to use a mobile phone?!
    Felt sick while walking... And everyone doesn't carry mobile phones on principle. But when we got to the desktop computers, they reported that an hour ago the person felt sick.
    But within an hour the person either got better, or was already gone. The person.
    1. 0
      17 August 2025 08: 23
      Yes, it's simple: two cars collided. How to call the commissioners? Sit and wait, like before, for someone to meet traffic cops on the road? They've already written about medicine. Yes, there are a lot of different cases. It's somehow strange not to use normal communication.
      If it were unreasonably expensive, like in the 90s, it would be understandable.
  28. 0
    22 August 2025 00: 38
    I would be happy to shoot from a revolver, but unfortunately, the only short-barreled weapons we have at our shooting ranges are Makarov and Yarygin pistols.
    A month ago I reissued my gun license, of course the three required shots from the Yarygin is very little, so after the exam I paid for three dozen cartridges
    1. 0
      22 August 2025 00: 46
      what is called "unburdened the soul", after all, when shooting from a pistol, the sensations are completely different than from a carbine or a rifle...
      I would gladly trade my entire arsenal for one pistol or revolver.
      1. 0
        22 August 2025 02: 06
        Quote: assault
        I would gladly trade my entire arsenal for one pistol or revolver.

        And what do you have in your arsenal? laughing
        1. 0
          22 August 2025 04: 45
          Two guns, a carbine, a traumatic...
          1. 0
            22 August 2025 12: 26
            It's a pity I don't have a revolver or a pistol, otherwise it would have been a good exchange. laughing hi
            1. 0
              22 August 2025 13: 29
              It's not just you who doesn't have a revolver or a pistol...
              I bought a Trauma in the 00s, it’s lying idle in a safe and I can’t sell it to anyone, the stores are full of them.
              My knees won't let me go on a driven hunt with long barrels, and I've gotten tired of hiding in a boar's blind, it's no longer interesting...
  29. 0
    9 October 2025 11: 59
    "You haven't covered everything" (referring to pistol cartridges)

    Aha! That's obviously me. The cartridge size is usually indicated in the following style: 9/18, or 9/17, or 9/19. I don't think three numbers and a punctuation mark (or division mark) wink) will take up too much space in the article, but without this information it is very difficult to even evaluate the weapon.
  30. 0
    20 October 2025 07: 34
    Larger dimensions and weight compared to a pistol with a similar capacity, a high barrel relative to the hand, resulting in barrel rise when firing, slow reloading, and, in most cases, a stiffer trigger pull than a pistol, resulting in less accurate fire. A weapon that has outlived its usefulness and is obsolete. For collectors and fans of the franchise.
  31. 0
    24 November 2025 01: 05
    "Taurus" 905


    I had a Taurus in my hands - it was a great experience, unlike the Ruger LCR.