Self-aiming combat elements "Motiv-3M" in the Special Operation

110 096 69
Self-aiming combat elements "Motiv-3M" in the Special Operation
Use of the SPBE Motiv-3M in November 2023. The flight of the impact core is captured as a bright beam. Photo: Telegram / "Military Chronicle"


The Russian army has a wide range of anti-tank weapons and weapons. One of the most interesting examples of such a purpose is the self-aiming combat element "Motiv-3M". According to known data, such products have been repeatedly used during the current Special Operation. They successfully destroyed enemy armored vehicles, and it can be expected that in the future the combat score of such weapons will continue to grow.



Combat elements in Special Operations


In early November 2022, Ukrainian formations attempted an offensive in the Berdyansk and Melitopol directions. The operation involved tank and mechanized brigades, as well as territorial defense. This group was promptly detected by a Russian drone aviation.

Soon after, Ukrainian columns came under attack from Russian aircraft, as well as cannon and rocket fire. artillery. Industry sources reported that Smerch multiple launch rocket systems were used to repel the attack. They used several types of rockets, including 9M526 products with a cluster warhead carrying Motiv-3M self-aiming warheads (SPBE).

As a result of a series of Russian strikes, the enemy lost several armored vehicles, a lot of improvised military equipment and manpower. After that, he was forced to retreat to his original positions.

The next time the Motiv-3M product was in news about a year later, in early November 2023. Then, reports appeared on specialized resources about the use of such weapons in the area of Avdiivka. It is noteworthy that this time a video demonstrating the operation of combat elements was made publicly available.

The video showed a certain area where enemy armored vehicles were located. Then bright lines flashed in the frame, after which the equipment caught fire and began to smoke. This is exactly what it looks like when a ground target is hit by a flying combat element, which forms the so-called strike core.


Since November 2023, there has been no new reliable information about the combat use of the SPBE "Motiv-3M". At the same time, some known episodes allowed us to assume that such weapons continue to be used and participate in the demilitarization of Ukraine.

Recently, at the end of July 2025, specialized blogs remembered the "Motive" again, but this time without any real reason. Once again, both the product itself and the old video from Avdiivka are discussed. The combat element, which showed itself from the best side, receives high marks.

In development and in service


According to known data, the domestic industry has been working on the topic of anti-tank SPBE since at least the eighties. The lead developer of such weapons was NPO Bazalt, which had extensive experience in creating various ammunition, including for rocket artillery.

In the nineties and two thousandths, the first version of the SPBE-D combat element became a permanent exhibit at military-technical exhibitions. Later, a more advanced product, the Motiv-3M, appeared. It was based on the same ideas, but differed in design and characteristics.

The SPBE "Motiv-3M" was adopted by the Russian army in the XNUMXs. It was planned to be used as part of cluster warheads for ammunition of different classes and types. The combat elements were to end up in the arsenals of rocket artillery and frontline aviation.

Along with other ammunition, Motives have been used in various exercises over the past decades and demonstrated their capabilities. No later than November 2022, they were used for the first time in a real military operation. Such products have proven in practice the ability to independently target a ground target and then destroy it.


The Motiv-3M product in flight configuration. Photo: Telegram / Callsign Katzman

Combat element


The Motiv-3M product is made in a complex-shaped housing, the dimensions of which correspond to the limitations of the 300-mm Smerch rockets. The housing is structurally divided into two cylindrical parts connected asymmetrically. The upper part has a parachute mount.

The upper part of the body is the instrument compartment. On its lower end there is an infrared target sensor, and inside there are devices for signal processing and control of the warhead.

The lower half of the hull performs the functions of the warhead. It contains a cumulative charge, which forms the so-called impact core. The relatively large diameter of such a warhead allowed achieving high penetration characteristics. For such a SPBE, the ability to penetrate at least 70 mm of homogeneous armor when detonated at a distance from the target is declared.

Motiv-3M products are designed for use with cluster munitions of various types. Thus, the 9M526 projectile, the warhead of which holds 5 SPBE, was developed for the Smerch MLRS. The RBK-500 disposable bomb cluster with 15 elements is intended for combat aviation.

The principle of operation of the SPBE is quite simple. Several elements are delivered to the target area rocket or a bomb, after which they are ejected from the cassette. The element opens the parachute and begins to descend. Due to the asymmetrical suspension of the parachute, the "Motiv-3M" rotates around its axis during the descent.

During the descent, the target's infrared sensor scans the underlying surface in a narrowing spiral. When a hot object is detected, a command is given to detonate the warhead. The charge forms a strike core. It flies at high speed along the line of sight and hits the detected target. In this case, the strike falls on the least protected upper projection.


9M526 rocket for the Smerch multiple launch rocket system. Graphics Missilery.info

Rocket projectiles and cluster bombs carry several self-aiming combat elements and disperse them over the terrain. This increases the probability of successfully detecting a target or targets and subsequently destroying them. In case of a miss, a self-destructor is provided: the element detonates some time after falling to the ground.

Special tool


Self-aiming combat elements, such as the Motiv-3M, are designed to destroy enemy armored vehicles at significant distances. Such weapons have several characteristic features that determine their potential and value to the troops.

All SPBEs are made in the form of compact devices that can be placed in the warheads of different types of ammunition. For example, Motiv-3M is used with 300-mm rockets and bomb clusters. Due to this, the unified combat element can be used by both artillery and aviation, which provides certain advantages of production and other nature.

Compatible delivery vehicles have high characteristics, which have a positive effect on the potential of the SPBE. Thus, Smerch missiles deliver their payload at a range of up to 70 km. Combat aviation can demonstrate a significantly larger combat radius. As a result, cluster munitions with Motives surpass any other anti-tank weapons in terms of range.

One missile or cluster bomb delivers several SPBEs to the target area. This increases the probability of hitting a specific object and/or allows attacking several targets. In turn, the simultaneous use of several delivery vehicles increases the chances of a successful strike and also ensures coverage of a larger area.

The Motiv-3M product is one of the latest domestic developments in its class. It appeared in the decade before last, but still remains a relevant and useful means of combating enemy armored vehicles. Its competent use allows you to get the desired results - as the practice of the current Special Operation has shown several times.
69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    1 August 2025 04: 33
    and soon such ammunition will be guided by recognition modules and will hit equipment even more effectively.
    True, they will be installed on long-range systems. The near borders will be processed by drones. They are still cheaper. For now, they are cheaper.
    1. +5
      1 August 2025 12: 32
      Quote: Pavel Kislyakov
      such ammunition will be guided by recognition modules

      "More good and different goods" for the Russian Ministry of Defense!
  2. +3
    1 August 2025 04: 57
    Eeee..... A homing missile and a "self-aiming element".... You need to be able to call old things by new words!
    1. +10
      1 August 2025 08: 11
      But these are not synonyms. A homing missile can also have a passive seeker. A self-aiming element implies an active seeker (that is, the seeker itself illuminates the target without needing external target designation).
      1. +4
        1 August 2025 14: 16
        Quote: Illanatol
        A homing missile can also have a passive seeker. The homing element implies an active seeker (

        Unfortunately, your explanation is incorrect! (Like "inside out"!) The so-called SPBE can be with both passive sensors (coordinators) and active ones...! Russian SPBE, SPBE-B - "passive"; and SPBE-K - "active"! I would generally be cautious about the term GSN in relation to sensors (detectors, coordinators) of SPBE! hi
    2. +1
      1 August 2025 14: 04
      Quote: Reklastik
      You need to be able to call old things by new words!

      You need to have an understanding of what you are commenting on! There are homing ammunition (like missiles...); and there are self-aiming...!
  3. +1
    1 August 2025 05: 30
    I wonder why drones still don't have a core?
    1. +4
      1 August 2025 05: 49
      There were experiments on the Lancet, so that the core would penetrate both the protective mesh and the armor.
      1. +7
        1 August 2025 05: 57
        Quote: Vadim_2
        There were experiments on the Lancet, so that the core would penetrate both the protective mesh and the armor.

        The lancet hits the side, but here it is necessary during the flight. Into the roof and from a greater distance. This should probably be hung vertically on the FPV
        1. +1
          2 August 2025 13: 41
          Quote: Tlauicol
          This probably needs to be hung vertically on the FPV

          And work with drops. At the very beginning, they adapted old cumulative grenades for drops on the MTO and tank roofs. But the cumulative gives a thin stream, and the impact core breaks through the armor, creating many primary and secondary fragments. So it would be possible to reuse copters/multiple times, and the impact core hits the roof and MTO better, and easily passes through all the nets/visors. But then you need specially made ammunition, and not the standard RPG-7 carrots.
          However, now they use everything and anything.
    2. +6
      1 August 2025 07: 20
      Quote: Tlauicol
      I wonder why drones still don't have a core?

      I think because remote detonation is more difficult to ensure, and after all, almost all FPVs are semi-homemade, firstly.
      Secondly, you need special ammunition, and there are just a ton of RPG shots.
      Well, and thirdly, a BP with a shock core, for at least some armor penetration (70 mm), is noticeably heavier than a cumulative carrot with hundreds of mm of armor penetration.
      1. +1
        1 August 2025 07: 53
        Yes. They are probably heavy for simple drones.
        I would suggest turning the BC kum on the fpv down by 40 degrees (like on the rbs56). Now the fpvs attack at unfavorable angles.
        1. +1
          1 August 2025 07: 56
          Quote: Tlauicol
          I would suggest turning the BC kum on the fpv down by 40 degrees (like on the rbs56). Now the fpvs attack at unfavorable angles.

          I don’t know, the opinion of practitioners is needed here.
          Although when aiming, you also need to take into account the tilt of the warhead, which I think complicates the work.
          1. +2
            1 August 2025 08: 26
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            Quote: Tlauicol
            I would suggest turning the BC kum on the fpv down by 40 degrees (like on the rbs56). Now the fpvs attack at unfavorable angles.

            I don’t know, the opinion of practitioners is needed here.
            Although when aiming, you also need to take into account the tilt of the warhead, which I think complicates the work.

            Just hit the roof of the armored vehicle with a shallow dive. The vertical angle will be... You can even reduce the armor penetration by increasing the diameter of the jet.
            The angle is also more advantageous for vehicles camouflaged by a net. Otherwise, they hit along the armor
            1. 0
              1 August 2025 10: 35
              Quote: Tlauicol
              Just hit the roof of the armored vehicle with a shallow dive. The vertical angle will be... You can even reduce the armor penetration by increasing the diameter of the jet.

              The difficulty here, I see, is that FPV drones are equipped with a forward-facing camera, and the alignment of the warhead with it allows them to hit quite accurately, including hatches from above, since the dive angle can be set widely. But misalignment will not provide such accuracy.
              In addition, barbecues and hihol are widely used, which means that the approach from the stern/side is at least no less frequent than from above, and here the warhead at an angle can play a nasty trick.
            2. +1
              1 August 2025 21: 50
              Quote: Tlauicol
              You can even reduce armor penetration by increasing the diameter of the jet stream.

              Brilliant! But let me ask - why? wassat
              1. 0
                2 August 2025 05: 13
                Quote: Saxahorse
                Quote: Tlauicol
                You can even reduce armor penetration by increasing the diameter of the jet stream.

                Brilliant! But let me ask - why? wassat

                Then, to increase the armor impact on the target. 500mm will be excessive. The roof has thin armor. It is better to set the BT on fire than to punch a small hole through it.
                1. 0
                  2 August 2025 12: 57
                  Quote: Tlauicol
                  Then, to increase the armor impact on the target.

                  How do you think reducing armor penetration will increase the behind-the-armor effect?
                  1. -1
                    2 August 2025 13: 37
                    Quote: Saxahorse
                    Quote: Tlauicol
                    Then, to increase the armor impact on the target.

                    How do you think reducing armor penetration will increase the behind-the-armor effect?

                    Read it again carefully: "reducing armor penetration due to increasing the diameter of the jet". Doubling the diameter will give four times more armor fragments flying inside, plus the jet solution itself is larger, the incendiary effect is higher.
                    1. +1
                      2 August 2025 20: 50
                      Quote: Tlauicol
                      Doubling the diameter will result in four times more armor fragments flying inside, plus the jet solution itself will be larger, the incendiary effect will be higher.

                      What nonsense... fool
    3. +3
      1 August 2025 12: 08
      Quote: Tlauicol
      I wonder why drones still don't have a core?
      The penetrating properties of the "core" are highly dependent on the diameter of the funnel. For example, the "Motiv-3M" is located inside a projectile with a diameter of 30 cm. That is, its funnel is inscribed in these 30 cm. It is too big for a quadcopter, and controlling the detonation of this ammunition requires thought.
      By the way, we also have anti-helicopter mines in our arsenal. They have the same combat element, the "impact core".
      1. +3
        1 August 2025 12: 23
        No, 180mm diameter St. Petersburg. Europeans have 140-150
        1. +1
          1 August 2025 12: 24
          Quote: Tlauicol
          No, 180mm diameter St. Petersburg.
          Clear. Thanks for the information.
    4. +1
      1 August 2025 14: 35
      Quote: Tlauicol
      I wonder why drones still don't have a core?

      Actually, there are! Firstly, the VSU put "strike-nuclear" ammunition on drones ... secondly, one comrade on the Internet said that ours also put so-called engineering KZ with a "strike core" on some UAVs! The most famous are the KZ-6, used by both the Ukrainians and ours! These are "purely" cumulative charges (ammunition); but among the "line" of KZ there are even "strike-nuclear" ones! In general, from the beginning of the SVO I proposed using SPBE dropped on drones from the "Motiv-3M" topic! By the way, the warhead of the Smerch MLRS really does contain 5 SPBE in the "Motiv-3M" code! But I read once that the Smerch RS warhead was developed, containing as many as 20 (!) small-sized SPBE! Alas! I know nothing more about these small-sized SPBE!
  4. 2al
    0
    1 August 2025 08: 48
    It is strange that the SBE was not equipped with an electric motor, it is included with the battery, comparable in weight to the ejection charge and parachute. At the same time, it provides a significant increase in the performance characteristics of the ammunition, in terms of area and accuracy.
    1. 0
      1 August 2025 14: 43
      Quote: 2al
      It's strange that the SBE was not equipped with an electric motor,

      Well, you are like in a joke! ("If grandma had a penis, she would be a grandpa!") Then you would need not a detection sensor, but a full-fledged seeker head, and you would get not a SPBE, but a guided munition of a different "class"!
  5. -1
    1 August 2025 08: 52
    9M526 products with a cluster warhead carrying self-aiming warheads (SAW) "Motiv-3M".


    These products must be used to treat railway trains standing at stations and in loading/unloading areas; the impact must be much more effective than destroying a couple of cars with a hit from an Iskander or Kalibr...
    1. -2
      1 August 2025 08: 58
      Quote: assault
      These products must be used to treat railway trains standing at stations and in loading/unloading areas.

      That's right. And you have to shoot sparrows with a cannon. Yes

      Quote: assault
      the blow should be much more effective than destroying a couple of carriages hit by Iskander or Kalibr...

      1. Should not.
      2. 400+ kilograms of BC. A couple of wagons... hmm what
      1. -4
        1 August 2025 13: 57
        Yes, sir, you just have a paranoid syndrome about my posts, some are cured, maybe you will be lucky someday... 😊
        If you don't believe me, watch the video of Iskander missiles hitting trains, one or two cars are completely hit, the rest of the cars may get hit by shrapnel, but they are not completely hit and the cars can move...
        1. +1
          1 August 2025 14: 16
          Quote: assault
          watch the video of Iskander missiles landing on railway trains

          I saw what five tank units of the OF do to a train. And not on video.

          Quote: assault
          one or two carriages are completely damaged there

          You mean they disappear completely. Yes, that happens. laughing

          Quote: assault
          The rest of the cars may be hit by shrapnel, but they are not completely damaged and the cars can move...

          ... on crutches, and limping heavily. Go on, I love fairy tales Yes
          1. -4
            1 August 2025 14: 36
            I saw what five tank units of the OF do to a train. And not on video.


            How are you going to deliver and, most importantly, individually target each of the 5 tank high-explosive fragmentation shells???
            Will you quietly deliver a tank 200-300 km behind enemy lines???
            Or, as always, you forgot to think before writing a post...
            1. +3
              1 August 2025 14: 42
              Quote: assault
              How are you going to deliver and, most importantly, individually target each of the 5 tank high-explosive fragmentation shells???

              No way. What I mean is that the Iskander's (and even the Caliber's) warhead is somewhat larger than that of the aforementioned OF. Accordingly, the Iskander brings... somewhat more good.
              1. -4
                1 August 2025 14: 49
                The Iskander's warhead is certainly powerful, but it hits one point and, judging by the available videos, it often misses the cars, 20-30 meters from the train.
                A couple of carriages that fell into the warhead's range were completely destroyed, the rest remained intact, not even smoking....
                1. +3
                  1 August 2025 14: 55
                  Quote: assault
                  A couple of carriages that fell into the warhead's range were completely destroyed, the rest remained intact, not even smoking...

                  I'll let you in on a terrible secret - the fact that the carriage (in the video) looks almost like new doesn't mean that it's in working order. And what is a 500 kg explosion at 30 meters - I don't even want to think about that. Ninada laughing
                  1. -1
                    1 August 2025 15: 02
                    An explosion of 500 kg at 30 m is approximately equal to an explosion of 60-65 kg at 15 m and 8 kg at 7-8 m. Just imagine that a tank shell fell 7 m from the train. How many cars will it destroy?
                    1. 0
                      1 August 2025 15: 05
                      Quote: Tlauicol
                      How many carriages will he smash?

                      Are you also a theoretician, or have you seen anything in practice? Hint - there are no shell-less OFs, OFs are splinters laughing
                      1. 0
                        1 August 2025 15: 05
                        Yeah, and the carriages are balloons?
                      2. -1
                        1 August 2025 15: 07
                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        Yeah, and the carriages are balloons?

                        You'd be surprised, but you can damage a train car so that it can't move, even with a crowbar... and some motherfuckery. But we're getting distracted -

                        Quote: Paranoid62
                        Are you also a theoretician, or have you seen anything in practice?
                      3. 0
                        1 August 2025 16: 06
                        Of course it is possible. With a direct hit from a crowbar. And not at 30 meters.
                        Theorist. But I don't like fairy tales.
                      4. +1
                        1 August 2025 16: 21
                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        Theorist

                        Ok. And I don't want you to try this in practice - I personally didn't like it at all. request
                      5. -1
                        1 August 2025 16: 25
                        Quote: Paranoid62
                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        Theorist

                        Ok. And I don't want you to try this in practice - I personally didn't like it at all. request

                        What, tank shells exploded 30 (okay, 7) meters from the train and destroyed several cars?
                        So what are we talking about then?
                      6. 0
                        1 August 2025 16: 27
                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        So what are we talking about then?

                        Nothing. Let's finish. hi
        2. 0
          18 September 2025 21: 25
          He saw a lot of tanks firing directly at a train, it’s even interesting where such a battle took place.
    2. 0
      1 August 2025 09: 57
      The warhead is weak, made for tanks and armored vehicles, weak for a train, and not needed, a homing missile is needed there.
      1. +1
        1 August 2025 10: 39
        Quote: Victor Sergeev
        It's weak for a train and not needed anyway

        The locomotive, at any traction, is more than enough. But it is cheaper to simply have cassette BC with "bells", the main thing is to guess where the head and where the tail of the train is.
        1. 0
          1 August 2025 14: 43
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          But it is cheaper to simply have cassette warheads with "bells", the main thing is to guess where the head and tail of the train are

          Cheaper is the key word. And so - it has already been written here that there are drones with a heat seeker.
          1. 0
            1 August 2025 16: 07
            Quote: Paranoid62
            Cheaper is the key word.

            Cheaper than a missile with self-aiming submunitions. And there are Iskanders and Kalibrs with bells.

            Quote: Paranoid62
            And so - they have already written here that there are drones with heat seekers.
            What is their speed and range? Everything has its place...
            1. -1
              1 August 2025 16: 17
              Quote: Vladimir_2U
              What is their speed and range?

              There were a couple of articles about locomotives that were knocked out by them. No time to look for them now.
              1. 0
                1 August 2025 16: 18
                Quote: Paranoid62
                There were a couple of articles about locomotives that were knocked out by them. No time to look for them now.

                No problem. But it's one thing at 100-150 km, and another at 300-500.
    3. -1
      1 August 2025 09: 57
      These Motives can be delivered by Iskanders. It has a cassette warhead. But.
      The wagon should be as hot as a tank engine so that the Motive reacted to it. Better are the usual small cumulatives that are also available, mixed with POMs.
    4. 0
      1 August 2025 10: 00
      A hole in a wagon with coal, ore, and what next?
      Against a tank it will do. But most trains won't even notice.
    5. +2
      1 August 2025 14: 47
      Quote: assault
      These products must be used to treat railway trains standing at stations and in loading/unloading areas; the impact must be much more effective than destroying a couple of cars with a hit from an Iskander or Kalibr...

      I disagree with you! Judging by your comment, you have no sensible idea about either the SPBE or the Iskander cluster warhead! The SPBE is an anti-tank weapon!
      1. -4
        1 August 2025 16: 00
        SPBE - anti-tank weapon!

        Didn't you know that tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, self-propelled guns, and other armored vehicles are transported by rail?
        And if they are transported, then armored vehicles can be destroyed with homing munitions directly on the platforms.
        1. +1
          1 August 2025 20: 23
          Quote: assault
          Didn't you know that tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, self-propelled guns, and other armored vehicles are transported by rail?
          And if they are transported, then armored vehicles can be destroyed with homing munitions directly on the platforms.

          My God! What does this nonsense have to do with it? Which you stupidly push onto the page?! Well. You blurted out nonsense... it happens! So admit that it is nonsense and then there is an opportunity to talk about the real thing! But no! You stubbornly try to "put an owl on a globe"!
        2. 0
          2 August 2025 20: 29
          My God, you're just like a child, honestly, you saw the word "homing" and already went to destroy everything that moves and doesn't move. It's a pity, though, that in the harsh reality this sub-munition simply has an IR sensor, thanks to which the munition has a chance to visit the thermal trace of operating equipment, if it doesn't confuse it with other thermal signatures. How this sensor should respond to cold and motionless equipment standing on railway platforms is a mystery.
  6. 0
    1 August 2025 12: 41
    We need a reconnaissance and strike drone or a strike drone for dropping such elements. This could be either a heavy drone like the Ukrainian "Baba Yaga" or an aircraft-type drone capable of diving on a target for dropping, in the size of Gerani or Orion.
    1. -2
      1 August 2025 14: 42
      Perhaps PTAB-2,5-1 would work effectively against railway trains if they were targeted at fuel tanks, ammunition wagons and military equipment from heavy drones like Baba Yaga
    2. 0
      1 August 2025 14: 49
      Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
      We need a reconnaissance and strike drone or a strike drone to drop such elements.

      I support it! I have been proposing this idea since the beginning of SVO!
  7. 0
    1 August 2025 17: 37
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    Quote: Reklastik
    You need to be able to call old things by new words!

    You need to have an understanding of what you are commenting on! There are homing ammunition (like missiles...); and there are self-aiming...!

    What's the difference? It seems to me that aiming and guiding are synonyms. I've also heard about homing torpedoes.

    After some thought, I found subtle semantic differences. After aiming comes the shot and then that's it. And aiming can be done after the shot. But honestly, it seems to me like trying to fit an owl onto a globe.
    1. 0
      1 August 2025 19: 25
      Quote: LuZappa
      To be honest, it seems to me that this is trying to fit an owl onto a globe.

      In no case! When homing, the seeker must constantly monitor the target and the rudders constantly help it with this! At the same time, both the target and the missile can maneuver ... even change direction! The SPBE "simply" scans a certain part of the space and the "shot" follows immediately as the target enters the "sight"!
    2. +1
      2 August 2025 07: 37
      Quote: LuZappa
      What's the difference? It seems to me that aiming and pointing are synonyms.


      You can also aim the sight - take aim. Control the sight.
      You can also aim the ammunition. Control the ammunition.
      Self-aiming ammunition - does not control its trajectory, following a predetermined one. Let's say it just has a smart remote fuse with a target sensor and a scanning trajectory... When a target appears in the sight, it detonates.

      But the homing one changes its own trajectory according to the target held in the sight (homing head).

      Well, something like this... winked
  8. +1
    2 August 2025 07: 39
    This is a long-known Soviet weapon.
    Known to NATO countries since the late 80s.
    And now they are trying to draw this new weapon.
    This cluster munition has been used by MLRS many times in Syria.

    And this is not a modern wonder weapon, but a so-called "Soviet galosh".
    1. -1
      2 August 2025 19: 57
      Quote: OXOTHuKvip
      And this is not a modern wonder weapon, but a so-called "Soviet galosh".

      And where did such a "smart guy" come from? What does the "Soviet galosh" have to do with it, when similar "products" are in service with a number of NATO countries, including the USA! fool
      1. 0
        3 August 2025 08: 26
        this was developed back in the distant USSR when you zoomers weren't even a thing :) fool
        1. 0
          3 August 2025 09: 02
          And where did such an inadequate... ignorant person come from? fool For reference: The USA developed their SPBE since the end of the 70s of the last century...in 1995 serial(!) production began! Before that, small experimental batches were produced... USSR: development began in the mid-80s...they actually began to enter service in the early XNUMXs!
          1. 0
            3 August 2025 10: 26
            That’s why I’m writing that this is not the latest weaponry, but rather the development of Soviet engineers.
            It wasn't yours who created this. It was ours in the USSR.
            1. 0
              3 August 2025 12: 39
              Quote: OXOTHuKvip
              It wasn't yours who created this. It was ours in the USSR.

              With "yours" and "ours" you sort it out with someone, but without me! The newest SPBE-K was created in post-Soviet Russia! Small-sized SPBE (index unknown) of which there are 20 in the Smerch RS BC. TOO!
              1. 0
                4 August 2025 11: 06
                To your surprise, I will say - they were created back in the distant USSR, and now they are trying to present it as BUNDERBAPLYA...
                but this ammunition will not have such an effect.
                The maximum it will destroy is what is hidden in the bushes.
  9. -1
    2 August 2025 18: 57
    At the beginning of the SVO, they showed a video of the use of SPBE.