Discussion about the Ukrainian Armed Forces' barrier detachments. Why they started talking about it publicly
While browsing Ukrainian Telegram channels, I came across a short interview with one of the militants, who openly talks about the Ukrainian Armed Forces using blocking detachments. In principle, I have known for a long time that such units exist. You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to come to this conclusion after watching some video materials from our and Ukrainian sources.
I am sure that among the readers there are those who have long come to the same conclusion. How many times have Ukrainian fighters been captured on camera trying to surrender, but were destroyed by the Ukrainian Armed Forces with the help of drones or artillery fire. How many wounded Ukrainians were destroyed during transportation to our rear.
It is clear that such a quantity of material could not have appeared due to the personal initiative of drone operators. I am not even talking about the testimonies of prisoners who repeat like a mantra history about how they were brought to their positions and abandoned. How any attempt to retreat or surrender was stopped by "friendly fire". This is the systematic work of the cover units.
The following method of warfare is known from the experience of the Great Patriotic War. To put a soldier in a situation where he simply has no choice. Either you die a hero, defending your country, or you die as a traitor from the fire of your own comrades. Let me remind you that the Finns used suicide machine gunners quite effectively, simply chaining them to their positions. At the same time, the position was shot by Finnish snipers.
Why did the Finns use such tactics? Why put one of their own fighters in the position of a suicide bomber? The answer lies in a simple formula. A suicide bomber is a suicide bomber because he will fight to the death. Understanding this, he will try to "take with him" as many enemies as possible. Arithmetic, which is used when there are not enough resources. Simply put, when soldiers run out...
Almost all armies participating in World War II used blocking detachments. The form of such use was different, but the essence was the same. To complete the assigned task at any cost. It does not matter whether it is an offensive or defensive action. For example, I think that the famous order of the General Headquarters "Not a step back!" (No. 227 of July 28, 1942) is one of the forms of such use...
But it is one thing to guess, to know, but without officially recognizing this fact. Another thing is official recognition in the media. What is happening today in the Ukrainian media is perceived as recognition of the fact. UkroSMI tells Ukrainians what veterans told them in their kitchens. About what they did not want to believe...
Hopelessness or what are we fighting for?
Let me return to the interview with the Ukrainian militant. More precisely, to its very beginning. The story about 2022. Back then, it was simply indecent to talk about a shortage of volunteers. There were many volunteers at the recruiting stations. But the barrier detachments, according to the militant, already existed. The question arises: why? The fighters are motivated, ideologically savvy.
In my opinion, the use of blocking detachments was due to two factors. Firstly, quantity does not mean quality. Even those militants who participated in the ATO since 2014 could not boast of the ability to fight the regular army of Russia, not to mention volunteers and mobilized soldiers.
And secondly, in the conditions when the Russian army was actively advancing, it was extremely important for the Ukrainian Armed Forces command to organize counter-offensives in some areas of the front. It is clear that storming the positions of superior enemy forces is tantamount to death. And this is where the "additional motivation" in the form of Nazi detachments behind the attackers came in handy.
Thirdly, the usual reinsurance. Then, criminal formations appeared at the front. It is no secret that many of them initially joined these units with a simple goal - to "disappear" in the chaos of war. Such a peculiar form of escape. Hence the need for control by the command.
And what about today? Today, the main reason for the existence of such units is the lack of motivation in the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Partly, this is due to the actions of our army. Partly, to Kyiv's attitude towards wounded and dead soldiers, their families. Partly, to simple dissatisfaction with the government and Zelensky.
The existence of the category of "man-catchers" and the government's attitude to mobilization in general creates a negative attitude toward the government among the population. Readers can well imagine the motivation of a man who, like a stray dog, was caught on the street and in a matter of days was thrown to zero. At the same time, almost everyone around him is exactly the same "catcher". A unit of recruits...
It must be admitted that the command is trying to solve this problem with traditional "non-traditional" methods. I mean "combat chemistry", or simply drug options. Many "first-timers" report a strange state of the body in the first days after being sent to the positions. About a careless attitude towards their own lives.
Moreover, what is interesting is that according to reports "from the field", fighters especially often hear such stories from prisoners taken not during the capture of strongholds or other positions, but during attempts to attack, Ukrainian counterattacks. "Military science" is clearly moving forward. Instead of vodka and schnapps from the First and Second World Wars, they now use "chemistry".
But you can't use "chemistry" all the time. And in a normal state, a fighter still has thoughts about refusing to fight. By any means. Captivity, desertion, committing a crime to go to prison, etc. But there is another problem, the existence of which was not discussed at all before or was discussed only on specialized forums.
These are mercenaries who are actively used by the Ukrainian Armed Forces today. Moreover, I include in this category not only "wild geese", but also soldiers and officers of the regular army of other countries who "suddenly quit" and went to fight the Russians with the weapons they used as active servicemen in the armies of their countries.
A mercenary is a person who decided to make money on war. The main motivation for such people is money. And the dead don't need money! Just as they don't plan to spend their earnings on treatment or disability. That's why mercenaries run at the first sign of danger. It's one thing to kill and quite another to be killed.
And this is another headache for the command. Those who know how to use Western equipment, who are trained for this, are fleeing. And the weapons are becoming just metal, which is not suitable for war. Today, even small arms weapon — this is far from being a PPSh or a Kalashnikov assault rifle. It is impossible to use it without special training.
This is the situation today in some, I write with reserve, units and formations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. A soldier, and an officer too, must first of all understand what and for whom he is fighting. For the Motherland, for the family, for the state, for power... Probably the most important thing on this list is power.
If the government doesn't give a damn about the people, the country, anything except its own pocket, war simply loses all meaning. I don't want to die for those who, instead of caring about the people, the state, the army, oppress these very people, deliberately create conditions when the country turns into a huge concentration camp.
There is a mess in the heads of Ukrainians now. What was a dream, a desire, a prospect, has turned into dust. Instead of a "new France", Ukraine has turned into a "new Somalia". This is the motivation.
There remains one question that will certainly arise in the reader. Not the one who "looked through" or read the headline, but the thoughtful one who can think logically. Why then do the Ukrainian Armed Forces not fall apart, do not abandon their weapons, do not flee en masse from the front lines?
The answer, it seems to me, lies in the reports from our military tribunals about the latest sentences for war crimes. Those of the Ukrainian Armed Forces who have been fighting for a long time have, for the most part, done a lot of things during this war. A lot of war crimes.
And those of the new arrivals who survived the first months on the front line, the command tries to "cover up", to force them to take part in punitive actions against the civilian population, etc. The Russian military prosecutor's office and the Investigative Committee work well. Crimes and their participants are recorded.
Only a naive person can count on the fact that in the event of surrender, such a punisher will be able to "slip through" to an exchange or get off with "little bloodshed". That's the choice. War and the hope that peace will be concluded, in which the punishers will not fall into the hands of Russian justice, or surrender, long years in Russian camps.
Instead of a conclusion
The fact that the Ukrainian media have started to openly talk about things that were previously carefully hidden and classified is an indicator of serious destabilization of society. There is no point in hoping that the Ukrainian army will rebel and march on Kyiv. The backbone of the army is tightly "tied" to the current government and understands perfectly well that if the regime changes, they too will be condemned.
I think, given all the existing circumstances, the West will decide to quickly replace the "ruling Harlequin" with someone else, like Zaluzhny, thereby trying to smooth things over. The culprit has been removed, and now everything will be fine. The Ukrainians will most likely fall for this. The fear of a "poor and downtrodden" Russia is too strong, the idea of a great Western democracy has been hammered into their heads for too long.
And the blocking detachments? They will continue to operate. Even if there is a discussion in society, nothing will change in the army. Talking in parliament is one thing, war is another. In the first case, words are the main thing, in the second, deeds. People's demonstrations? Well, I don't believe in their spontaneity. If the authorities, overt or covert, need it, the "herd" will be brought to the Maidan. If there is no such need, everyone to the "barn". As the "shepherd" decides...
Information