A carrier of the "Daggers" or a time-tested high-altitude interceptor: in what ways the legendary MiG-31 is more relevant

11 275 34
A carrier of the "Daggers" or a time-tested high-altitude interceptor: in what ways the legendary MiG-31 is more relevant

Developed during the Cold War, the MiG-31 was a direct successor to the famed MiG-25, but with far more sophisticated avionics, weapons, and target acquisition capabilities. Work on the interceptor began in the late 1960s, when the Soviet Union recognized the need for a machine capable of defending vast airspace from threats posed by strategic bombers and cruise missiles. missiles.

The MiG-31 made its first flight in 1975 and entered service in 1981. Its main task was to combat high-speed targets at extremely high altitudes.



The fighter, nicknamed Foxhound in the West, is capable of reaching speeds of up to 3 km/h, operating at a practical altitude of over 000 kilometers and carrying up to four R-20 long-range missiles, and in later modifications – six R-33M, each of which can hit a target at a distance of up to 37 kilometers.

The two-person crew – a pilot and a navigator-operator – controls not only the flight, but also the complex target detection and tracking system. A unique feature of the aircraft is the ability to transmit data to other fighters, effectively turning it into a command center in the sky.

At the same time, the MiG 31, originally conceived as a supersonic interceptor of air targets at high altitude, has become a tool of strategic influence in modern conditions. The modernized MiG 31K, capable of carrying the Kinzhal hypersonic missile (in fact, the MiG-31K itself is the Kinzhal hypersonic complex), opened a new chapter in its operation.

In the current armed confrontation in Ukraine, the aircraft has been and continues to be used repeatedly to launch the aforementioned hypersonic missiles, which are capable of traveling more than 2 km and reaching speeds of up to Mach 000.

In addition, the MiG 31B version received the ability to refuel in the air, which increased the fighter’s already impressive range. Thus, in 2013, the crews of the 14th Air Force Army and Defense The Central Military District set a record for the duration of a non-stop flight on MiG-31BM fighters, spending 7 hours and 4 minutes in the sky. The flight range was more than 8000 km with three mid-air refuelings.

Meanwhile, the MiG 31's use largely retains its previous function. It remains one of the few platforms capable of carrying the R 37M missile, used to intercept enemy missiles, aircraft and drones at high altitude and speed, performing air defense missions where our other available air assets “cannot reach.”

At the same time, against the background of the limited number of MiG-31Ks – according to various sources, no more than 20 units – it becomes clear that the rocket carrier remains more of a “symbol of strength” than a mass weapon. Despite modernization and the return of in-flight refueling, the platform is becoming obsolete, which means that other machines will most likely become hypersonic carriers in the future.

Thus, despite the fact that the legendary MiG has been partnered with hypersonic missiles, high-altitude interception remains the fighter's key function. Most likely, in the foreseeable future, the priority in using this technology will remain on the side of air defense and protection of strategically important objects.

34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    21 July 2025 14: 31
    Carrier of the "Daggers" or a time-tested high-altitude interceptor: what is the legendary MiG-31 more relevant

    Naturally, for now, as a carrier of the "Daggers".
    It's just that there's no place yet to demonstrate his other capabilities.
    1. +1
      21 July 2025 14: 36
      Meanwhile, the use of the MiG 31 largely retains its previous function
      And the main functions are interceptor....
      1. -2
        21 July 2025 15: 08
        Why "OR"? It can be both a carrier of daggers and an interceptor. No one has removed the radar from the MiG-31K. The mass of the Kinzhal missile is 4615 kg. This is about half the combat load; it can easily take a couple more R-37M missiles.
        1. -1
          22 July 2025 20: 03
          And what should these two missiles be hung on? Put in the pilot's cabin?
          1. 0
            22 July 2025 20: 19
            Quote: Clever man
            Put it in the pilot's cabin?

            If only there would be a "smart guy" as a pilot.
            And so there is a suspension scheme known to everyone.
            1. -1
              22 July 2025 20: 40
              The diagram of the dagger suspension + 2 rockets in the studio! You don't have one??
    2. +1
      21 July 2025 15: 27
      The MiG-31, created during the Cold War, became the direct successor of the famous MiG-25******from the text*** The MiG-31 was not a direct successor of either the 25th or the 29th. It is a fundamentally different fighter.
      1. +2
        22 July 2025 14: 51
        The MiG-31 was not a direct successor to either the 25th or the 29th.

        Yes, journalistic cliches are enough. These are different aircraft, for example, the MIG-25 airframe is made of high-temperature stainless steel, while the MIG-31 has titanium alloys. They also have different performance characteristics (the twenty-fifth is faster), and there are many other significant differences that can be listed.
  2. +3
    21 July 2025 14: 32
    What's going on with MiG production now? Who knows? Is the plant dead?
    1. +6
      21 July 2025 14: 55
      Rumor has it that the UAC management hopes to resume production of the MiG-35 for the DPRK. Maybe our generals will have a conscience and the Ministry of Defense will sign a contract. It would be a very useful machine in the SVO and the future war with NATO, as well as in protecting airports and large industrial centers of the country from UAV attacks.
      1. 0
        27 July 2025 12: 38
        There was also information about the resumption of production of D-30F6 engines.
  3. -3
    21 July 2025 16: 08
    Is it too much trouble to repeat the MiG-31???
    1. +4
      21 July 2025 17: 58
      Weak. The production used components, a considerable part of which were made outside the RSFSR, and in particular in the Ukrainian SSR. Rather than restoring 1970s technologies from scraps of documentation, it would be easier, faster, and cheaper to develop a completely new machine with an eye on the technologies available in the Russian Federation. At the same time, "easier, faster, and cheaper" means only in comparison, and not "simple, fast, and cheap."
      And in general, it is easier to appoint the Su-35 as a high-altitude interceptor. If it is worse than the MiG-31 in some ways, then not by much, and in some ways, which is not surprising, it is even better. And there are no air carriers of the "Daggers" other than the MiG-31, and these carriers are needed "here (in/on 404) and now."
      1. -3
        21 July 2025 19: 25
        The SVO in Ukraine showed that high-altitude carriers are needed, like the MiG-25, 31, but modern ones, with a flight altitude of 30-35 km. A gliding bomb from a height of 30 km and launched at a speed of 3000 km/h will fly 400 km, and a missile will go into hypersonic flight. The altitude record on the MiG-25 aircraft was set on August 31, 1977 and is 37 meters. Science and technology have advanced far ahead in 650 years. Now it is realistic to make a high-altitude carrier for 50 km. It must be done, because the republics of the post-Soviet space and border states along the perimeter of Russia await the Russian Federation ahead.
        1. +3
          21 July 2025 19: 36
          Quote: Vlad Gor
          The Russian Federation is ahead of the republics in the post-Soviet space and border states along the perimeter of Russia

          A great commander sleeps inside you. Don't wake him up. laughing
          1. -2
            21 July 2025 19: 56
            You are not afraid to go to bed in Russia and wake up in some principality.
            1. +3
              21 July 2025 19: 57
              Quote: Vlad Gor
              Aren't you afraid to go to bed in Russia and wake up in some principality?

              No. Moreover, I don’t even see a single sensible option for implementing such a scenario. request
              1. -2
                22 July 2025 11: 53
                Anything can happen. They left the Soviet Union and came to the Russian Federation.
                1. +1
                  22 July 2025 11: 54
                  Quote: Vlad Gor
                  They left the Soviet Union and came to the Russian Federation

                  One more time:

                  Quote: Paranoid62
                  I don't even see a single sensible option for implementing such a scenario
        2. +1
          21 July 2025 20: 12
          Quote: Vlad Gor
          A glide bomb launched from a height of 30 km and at a speed of 3000 km/h
          most likely will fall apart into pieces. Judging by the appearance, the UMPK, as it is, is not designed for supersonic. Of course, it is possible to make a supersonic version of the UMPK (more durable, with swept wings, and a bunch of other changes), but it would probably be more expensive than a rocket engine for a standard UMPK, which would give no worse results. And an aircraft at an altitude of 30 km near the LBS is a dream of an SAM operator.
          1. -1
            22 July 2025 12: 37
            As a civilian, I will not argue with you. As a techie and physicist, you will not be able to destroy cast iron even at cosmic speed, it will burn, melt, and may self-detonate from overheating. Heat-resistant bombs FAB-25 were created especially for the MiG-500RB, which were dropped from a height of 20 meters at a speed of 000 km / h. The bomb weighing 2300 kg, having flown several dozen kilometers, was driven into the ground to a depth of several meters, where it exploded, turning the entire adjacent territory inside out. After separation from the aircraft, the bomb flies a distance of 500 km along a ballistic trajectory in 40-80 seconds. There was information that at the testing ground the bomb flew 100 km. This is without the UMPK. Now, hanging a supersonic UMPK on simple cast iron is not a difficult task. The missile is better, but it is much more expensive than the bomb. They made a lot of bombs, they are in warehouses. In relation to shooting down a target at an altitude of 100 km, having a speed of 30 Mach. The SAM missile will rise to an altitude of 2 km in more than 30 seconds. I do not know the capabilities of the SAM, especially since the aircraft does not cross the LBS.
            1. +1
              22 July 2025 19: 15
              Quote: Vlad Gor
              As a techie and physicist, I can tell you that you won’t be able to break cast iron apart even at cosmic speed.

              Cast iron will be fine, but the UMPK will break off its wings with the oncoming flow, they are not designed for such speeds. Again, supersonic requires a completely different wing shape compared to subsonic. Yes, of course, it is possible to make a more durable gliding module with adjustable sweep, but it is not cheap, and it is unclear whether it makes sense for a limited number of carriers.
              Quote: Vlad Gor
              I don’t know the capabilities of the air defense missile system, especially since the aircraft does not cross the LBS.

              The hosts have already pulled the Patriot almost right up to the LBS a couple of times.
              Operational range: 160 km (99 mi) (max)
              maximum speed:
              PAC-2: GEM+: 5,630 km/h (3,500 mph)
              PAC-3: 6,170 km/h (3,830 mph)

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIM-104_Patriot
              So, consider how much a drop from 30 km altitude will add if it has to be done more than a hundred km from the LBS.
              1. 0
                22 July 2025 20: 47
                I can't tell you whether such a carrier is needed or not. Now bombs from the UMPK are dropped from altitudes of up to 10 km at subsonic speed. Aircraft do not cross the LBS, the probability of their destruction is higher than that of a stratospheric high-altitude aircraft. Everything must be calculated.
          2. 0
            24 July 2025 01: 12
            Well, I don’t really want to argue with you, sorry, but there are a lot of inconsistencies here.
            Firstly, the UMPK initially has a sweep angle up to supersonic speed (the angles are normal there), secondly and most importantly, what is the "dream" of the air defense forces of the Saloreich at 30 km altitude? What SAM systems "near the LBS" can shoot at 30 km?
            Well, there's no need at all. What's there on the LBS at 30 km? It's not funny.
            Otherwise, I agree in many ways.
      2. +1
        22 July 2025 10: 37
        And what's wrong with the Tu-22M3M as a carrier of Kinzhals? Moreover, at least a couple of them can be suspended from it. It seems that such a modification of the bomber has already been made.
      3. +1
        23 July 2025 06: 28
        It would be easier, faster, and cheaper to develop a completely new machine with an eye on the technologies available in the Russian Federation.

        The current UAC is not capable of developing a "completely new machine" to replace the An-2, and you propose the MiG-31 as a replacement. Ridiculous!
        We were in MAP, we were in MOP, and now we, brothers, are in the a**
        (O. Samoylovich. "Near Sukhoi" (Memoirs of an aircraft designer))
        1. -1
          23 July 2025 18: 16
          Quote: Amateur
          The current UAC is unable to develop a "completely new machine" to replace the An-2
          They have developed them, and not just one. But they all run into the lack of a motor and money for production.
          Quote: Amateur
          You are proposing a replacement for the MiG-31
          I am not suggesting it at all. I am simply assuming that after the collapse of the USSR, developing a new aircraft may be simpler and cheaper than resuming production of the MiG-31. That is how many technologies that were lost or ended up abroad need to be recreated practically from scratch.
      4. DO
        0
        5 August 2025 16: 33
        Quote: Nagan
        And in general, it is easier to appoint the Su-35 as a high-altitude interceptor.

        As a replacement for the two-seat MiG-31 interceptor to protect Russia's long northern borders, the two-seat Su-30 would likely be a better choice. However, this aircraft would benefit from the modern radar from the Su-57 to function as an air defense interceptor.
        To strengthen the air defense of the dangerous western and eastern borders, it might be worthwhile not to skimp on the two-seat version of the Su-57.
    2. 0
      21 July 2025 19: 30
      Quote: Vlad Gor
      Is it too much trouble to replicate the MiG-31?

      No, not a reader...



      And this, I note, is only on topware. All you have to do is type "pack dp" into the search. request laughing
      1. -1
        22 July 2025 20: 54
        Where does the MiG-41 fly and where is the PAK DP? What is there to discuss about something that may appear in 25 years, or may not appear at all.
        1. 0
          22 July 2025 20: 56
          Quote: Vlad Gor
          Where does the MiG-41 fly and where is the PAK DP?

          Hmm.

          Quote: Vlad Gor
          Is it too much trouble to repeat the MiG-31???

          You asked - I answered. They repeat, on a new technical level, still in process.
  4. +1
    22 July 2025 20: 04
    What would we do without the USSR and its "galoshes"
  5. 0
    6 August 2025 20: 52
    When the USSR collapsed, Kazakhstan was left with a whole regiment of MiG 31s based at the Zhana Semey airfield in Semipalatinsk. The Kazakhs destroyed several of them. The rest were transferred to Karaganda. In the end, there was nowhere to fly them in Kazakhstan, and probably no one either. Now they are put up for auction as scrap metal. But no one has wanted to buy them for over a year now.
  6. 0
    30 August 2025 13: 53
    The MiG-25M flew into space, but the 31 did not, and I don’t understand why the Dagger can’t just be equipped with an additional booster stage and fired from suitable containers. I think it will fit into the S-300 with an additional booster stage or from the Bastion. I have a feeling that the Zircon is the same Dagger, only with a booster stage. bully