Russian soldiers captured female UAV operator in Sumy region

Russian military personnel continue active operations in the Sumy region, from where the Ukrainian Armed Forces invaded the Kursk region of the Russian Federation in August last year.

According to RIA News The commander of the group of the "Storm" detachment of the 40th separate guards marine brigade with the call sign "Pyatnashka" in the Sumy region, a Ukrainian UAV operator was captured by the fighters of this unit.

It is noted that this is a woman who was also under the influence of alcohol or drugs when she was captured by our military. That she is an operator drones in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the woman herself said.

The guys captured a female UAV operator who was intoxicated or on drugs, insane. When we led her to our positions, a mortar started firing at us, so she didn't make it

- said "Fifteen".

Earlier today, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported that our Geran-2 UAV crews destroyed a production workshop drones and components for them in the area of ​​the city of Konotop in the same Sumy region. In addition, our "Geran" covered a temporary deployment point of foreign mercenaries in the Zaporizhia region.

According to the Russian Defense Ministry, about 67 thousand enemy unmanned aerial vehicles have been destroyed since the beginning of the conflict.

Comments

[aszzz888]

When we led her to our positions, a mortar started firing at us, so she didn’t make it.

- said "Fifteen".

She chose the shorter route to Bandera...

[Konnick]

Quote: aszzz888

When we led her to our positions, a mortar started firing at us, so she didn’t make it.

- said "Fifteen".

She chose the shorter route to Bandera...

UAV operators, like snipers, are not taken prisoner...

[aszzz888]

UAV operators, like snipers, are not taken prisoner...

They chose a one-way path for themselves...

[your1970]

Quote: aszzz888

UAV operators, like snipers, are not taken prisoner...

They chose a one-way path for themselves...

In the army, no one chooses their own path

[Arzoo]

In the army, no one chooses their own path

Well, it's quite debatable. They choose.

[your1970]

Quote: Arzoo

In the army, no one chooses their own path

Well, it's quite debatable. They choose.

Not a gram of dispute. Zhukov, to whom Rokossovsky wrote in the description that Zhukov "cannot be appointed to staff and teaching work - "organically hates her" - obviously NOT was eager to get the position of Chief of General Staff of the Red Army.
Nevertheless, he was appointed to this position.
And another example
During the war, my grandfather's neighbor served in the artillery, paratroopers, tank crews, flamethrowers, signalmen, infantry, and sappers. He was called up ordinary at the May training camp - he had a school - he finished the war as a captain, with several orders.
I laughed - that only the Air Force and the Navy were not, the rest ALL было
He chose such an assortment with the words "And now I want to be a sapper!!!"???!!!
Yeah, definitely everything

[Prometey]

Quote: your1970

Zhukov, to whom Rokossovsky wrote in his character reference that Zhukov "cannot be appointed to staff and teaching work - he organically hates it"

How could Rokossovsky write a character reference for Zhukov if he:
1. He was lower in position and rank than him.
2. He himself was arrested before the war and released shortly before the war, including at the request of the same Zhukov?

[your1970]

Quote: Prometey

How could Rokossovsky write a character reference for Zhukov if he:
1. He was lower in position and rank than him.

Rokossovsky was a division commander - in which Zhukov was a regiment commander. Then Zhukov became a brigade commander in the same division - under Rokossovsky's command. Rokossovsky received the division commander title 3 years earlier than Zhukov.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

And UAV operators, as a rule, are not captured, since they work remotely due to LBS. Behind the backs of their infantry. Usually, when they are detected, they are also destroyed remotely. This is just a lie. And then they even laughed at the correspondent.

[Arzoo]

I remember in the Kursk region, during an offensive, our troops surrounded a platoon. They were all shot.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

Was there a video? A whole platoon and they shot it? A platoon of drone operators? Or did you hear it from someone somewhere?

[Arzoo]

There was a video. The platoon was taken down. According to our guys, UAV operators. Well, you can't verify that.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

I haven't seen anything like that. Did you see the video yourself? Like 30 people? Looks more like a fake. I don't believe it. First of all Ukrainians It is extremely rare for entire units to be taken prisoner. UAV operators do not work in large groups. Well, in principle, this is a war crime that should have been dealt with by the prosecutor's office.

[Arzoo]

I saw the video. Several dozen. There was no crime, since some of them started shooting, a fight ensued. In the end, they all died. They drove out to them, as I understand it, in the confusion of the retreat. Google it, maybe you'll find it

[Dmitry_Nemets]

Ah, well then it's clear. What kind of prisoners are they if they started a fight. And naturally, not UAVs.

[hagen]

Quote: Arzoo

A fight ensued. In the end, everyone was killed.

Being shot and dying in battle are two different things. You decide somehow...

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: Dmitry_Nemets

In principle, this is a war crime that should have been dealt with by the prosecutor's office.

And where did you see this principle? In war... and a principle!? There are principles, but not the ones you are ready to "drool over"! If during a raid by a sabotage and reconnaissance group on enemy territory you come across local residents or... an enemy army checkpoint (even "Volkssturm" members!), then the sabotage and reconnaissance group has the right to destroy everyone! This is the law of war! Which does not take into account liberal "drooling"! During the Great Patriotic War there were cases when generals gave unspoken orders not to take prisoners of certain units, enemy troops in a certain theater of military operations! And in the end, this was treated with understanding!

[Dmitry_Nemets]

Well, there is a principle not to shoot prisoners. Another thing is that no one observes it. They were understanding, yes. Double standards. If our guys shot prisoners, then that's normal, it happened that way and they deserved it. But if our guys were shot, then those who did it are degenerates, fascists, etc.

[urik62]

I saw this video too. I can't go into detail, they were shot by our soldiers, and they were very angry.

[ROSS_51]

Quote: Konnick

UAV operators, like snipers, are not taken prisoner...

That's why I was surprised that they took her, especially Pyatnashka, especially since they liberated the Kursk region and their exchange fund is generally poorly replenished.
And then everything fell into place.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

Fifteen is a call sign for a fighter, not a brigade.

[Mazunga]

The storm squad is the most peace-loving guys))

[your vsr 66-67]

When we led her to our positions, a mortar started firing at us, so she didn’t make it.

And she did the right thing by not going there...
That's how we should treat them!
It didn't arrive and that's it... The mortars are to blame

[React]

Damn, the same thought flashed through my head.
Earth is glassy to her.

[Rt-xnumx]

Why did we take her prisoner? Against the wall.

[stankow]

This is wrong! And not according to the customs of war.

[fruc]

Well, if you didn't get there, then there was no need to describe this story. It's a pity that you didn't report whether you had a snack or not.

[Pankrat25]

She just died from coronavirus, what's so unclear about that?

[Penzyak]

a female UAV operator was captured in a state of intoxication or under the influence of drugs, insane

She was simply poisoned. There was a lethal dose of lead in her body. The mortar had nothing to do with it.

[fiv]

! She bought a ticket without a date a long time ago and flew out only now

[MichIs]

- Comrade, commander! We have captured a female enemy soldier. What should we do with her?
- To shoot!
- But she is beautiful?
- Okay... But then shoot!

P.S. No need to take them prisoner at all... they might even infect you

[Pavel Kislyakov]

Damn, you read my mind, I wrote the same thing as the answers above, and then I scrolled down a bit and saw a comment where the only difference was that it was about burning a witch.

[HAM]

There was information that Nadiya Savchenko was caught again...then they said that she "disappeared" in battle...probably like this korri them later......

[Evgeny from the Far East]

Already posted a video with a refutation. Alive and well, got a big mug like when she was sitting in the Rada

[Egoza]

Quote: Evgeniy-Far Easterner

Already posted a video with a refutation. Alive and well, got a big mug like when she was sitting in the Rada

So "Nadyusha" still has her whole life ahead of her. I hope that if Raa is captured again, she will not get a pardon.

[rotfuks]

There was information that Nadiya Savchenko was caught again...

You are not right. They wrote in Telegram that Nadya Savchenko was invited to Elon Musk's corporation and accepted the invitation. Now Elon and Nadya will act as a united front against Trump.

[Evgeny from the Far East]

"Was there a boy?" In this case, was there an aunt? It's unlikely that we'll be able to check.))

[Russobel]

She wouldn't have made it even if there hadn't been a mortar. That's their fate...

[22 dmdc]

Everything that happens happens for the best. And this ... should also be fed and protected.

[tank_killer156]

Why was it necessary to take it at all, although for information, how many, where the calculations are located and their base, so that later this gang could be covered with a watering can, well, and then slapped after the operation to destroy its brothers

[avdkrd]

That's right, that I didn't get there. Because...
And then I was even upset, the title assumed that it got through. It is not rational to take UAV operators prisoner. If a line fighter, due to psychological characteristics, really may be physically unable to shoot at a person, then remote operators do it with passion, like in a computer game. Drone operators, like snipers - their own are good, and the enemy's are only dead.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

A typical frontline story told to a visiting correspondent. They collected everything, the captured woman, the drugs, and their own people shot at them. And how lucky that the captured woman was killed, and all ours are alive. And no photos, no videos, as always.

[Andobor]

Who said that the prisoner was killed?
A normal commander wouldn't drag a stoned woman under fire.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

Try reading the article. Like they started taking her away, the enemy opened fire from a mortar. As a result, the prisoner didn't make it. It's a tall tale. Like the welded hatches in the tank.

[Xenofont]

And you want to believe it? The group commander will then report that death was caused by an overdose of NV and was accompanied by soft tissue damage, bone fractures and profuse bleeding. To kill several more fighters while escorting them for the sake of this inhuman creature is a crime.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

I don't believe the whole article. The journalist was simply told a story, and he was happy.

[Tarasios]

You have to understand that in Ukraine women are not "busified". For now, at least. Only doctors and computer scientists are subject to military registration. That is, you have to understand that the woman went to "drone drivers" purely of her own free will, most likely - under contract. Her choice. And a "mortar" on the way to captivity is quite logical.

[Foaly]

she was captured by our military

Somehow lyrically described.

[Comrade Beria]

Well done guys. Otherwise you'll write in your report that you had to "attempt to escape, seize weapons", then you'll only get extra trouble. It's good that "suddenly" an enemy mortar showed up, what can you expect from them, the adversaries?

Now if only it were the same in the rear with regard to "saboteurs". Like yesterday in Nalchik. Although a lot of paperwork would have to be written on this occasion.

Footage of the liquidation of a man who attacked a police officer with a knife in Nalchik



First, the assailant attacks a policeman in a white shirt. But then they open fire on him. The attacker fell and rose several times after being hit by bullets, as if he was under the influence of powerful drugs. In the end, they did not take him alive.

[Pavel Kislyakov]

What interested me here is that Tera was killed after he was disarmed.
in fact, it's a crime, they already detained him, and then just went and killed him. but I'm more than sure that THIS time it will be right if the big shots cover up everyone who was at the scene of the ghoul's liquidation. although I would have interrogated him first (even though they took a second person there, but the first could have known something the second didn't) and only then he "died" from the wounds he received during the attack. and he would have died much more painfully than from a simple finishing blow to the skull.

[Comrade Beria]

I think they'll let it slide. The suspect will simply write in his report that he saw an object in his hands that looked like a weapon, like a grenade, and used the weapon. The object later turned out to be a stone.

[Pavel Kislyakov]

I don't argue that if they wanted to, they could write a whole science fiction novel to justify it. And in this situation, I fully support them. But I just don't understand why they can't do the same in some situations when our people really did fight back against non-locals and they were jailed for it. After all, they could have also written a note and left THEIR own citizens and fellow tribesmen free. "Policemen" of proud republics do the same. Here's a lesson to some of our policemen about how you can sometimes act when it comes to our citizens and their misdeeds, which are often committed because these policemen didn't do their job properly.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

How far from reality you are. What other reports are there on the front line?

[Comrade Beria]

Judging by everything, you are not very familiar with the service, and you are definitely not familiar with the officer service.

There is such a document - the ZhBD, which is maintained in accordance with the Order of the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation No. 170 of May 23, 1999. And yes, reports can be both written and oral.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

You made me laugh. Unlike you, I am familiar with the realities of this war, not with papers. And I know perfectly well who writes or does not write reports and how.

[Comrade Beria]

What source did you use? TikTok? Or Telega?

Well then it's time to rip open your shirt.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

Why should I argue with a couch potato?

[kill the fascist]

They did the right thing by letting him go. They freed doctors, police, investigators, lawyers from unnecessary work and the penitentiary system from this jerk who would probably have spread Wahhabism in the zone.

[kill the fascist]

Well, overall everyone seems to be happy.

[Pavel Kislyakov]

except for the dead man. He will receive instead of money and what else was promised to him there - a grave where not at all houris will be waiting for him.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

I deeply doubt that she was drunk and stoned, for her coordination and fine motor skills are the main thing, judging by everything the journalist was fooled

[rotfuks]

I deeply doubt that she was drunk and stoned, for her coordination and fine motor skills are the main thing

Are you implying that she was sitting at the control panel 24/7 and launching drones? Do you not admit that she was simply tired and decided to relax her motor skills and coordination in a known way and miscalculated the dose?

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Well, yes, and in a drunken stupor she rushed to the front line, don't talk nonsense

[rotfuks]

Well, yes, and in a drunken stupor she rushed to the front line, don't talk nonsense

An ideological Ukrainian woman in any frenzy could only rush to the front line. She was programmed to destroy Muscovites. She can do nothing else. So stop talking nonsense.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

well yes, and there they immediately found out that she was a drone operator, because she was drunk, learn to be so critical of the information you receive

[rotfuks]

well yes, and there they immediately found out that she was a drone operator,

It is a big problem for couch potatoes to determine a military specialty. But an experienced soldier can identify a sniper, tanker or drone operator in a minute.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: rotfuks

And an experienced fighter will determine it in a minute

"experienced", what are the signs of a drone operator?

[rotfuks]

"experienced", what are the signs of a drone operator?

And you are not interested in the signs of a tanker?

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

And did they catch the tank driver too?
p.s. so what will you call it, or did you merge?

[Prisoner]

"...a mortar started firing at us, so it didn't reach us" (c) Liked.

[MBRSS]

Then there will be more female operators, then there will be teenage operators, then one teenager will be able to control a swarm of drones, and when there are no more teenagers, AI will take over (with help from Europe, via satellite, of course). All that will remain is to bring batches of drones closer to the enemy, i.e. to us. There may not be a single Ukrainian left in Ukraine, and Ukrainian drones will attack our facilities. Theoretically, such a war can last forever. Yeah, damn... we live in "interesting" times.

[rotfuks]

Then there will be more female operators, then there will be teenage operators, then one teenager will be able to control a swarm of drones, and when there are no more teenagers, the AI ​​will take over (with help from Europe, via satellite, of course). All that will remain is to bring batches of drones closer to the enemy, i.e. to us.

In fact, such a scheme works without any AI. Remember the famous Ukrainian operation "Web". There, drones were brought to the right place and operators connected to the drones via remote access. Perhaps those operators were sitting in London or Wiesbaden. So AI is not even needed. It is enough to provide remote access and the operators will sit in well-fed Europe sipping Bavarian beer and steering drones.

[kill the fascist]

This is not true. Drones/UAVs are a fashionable trend of the current war, which have occupied their niche in the line of weapons, but nothing more. Everything is decided on the ground and until the assault soldier is replaced by drones/robots, the infantry will remain the "queen of the fields".

[Brook-2]

was under the influence of alcohol or drugs

I wonder why the use of psychotropic drugs in the Ukrainian Armed Forces is not covered anywhere. Or do they not use these drugs on a large scale?

[Dmitry_Nemets]

Because these are rumors and gossip without any evidence.

[Paranoid62]

Quote: Dmitry_Nemets

Because these are rumors and gossip without any evidence.

Hmmm... good, confident answer, very military.

The only thing that's a little confusing is how would you know this answer? Let me remind you, the question was:

Quote: Brook-2

why is the use of psychotropic drugs in the Armed Forces of Ukraine not covered anywhere

I.e - in all Armed Forces of UkraineWell, and so where from?

[Dmitry_Nemets]

Remind me where exactly evidence of the use of psychotropic substances in the Armed Forces of Ukraine was published? With photos and names of drugs, etc. Just don't show ordinary drug addicts, of which there are plenty in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Laotian army.

[Paranoid62]

Quote: Dmitry_Nemets

Remind me where exactly evidence of the use of psychotropic substances in the Armed Forces was published?

Will you be one of God's chosen ones? Question for question - not kosher.

The absence of publication is not yet proof of the absence of psychotropic drug use. ABC.

And yes - the question is not whether it is applied or not. The question is whether where does the fighter get reliable information about their non-use. Which allows you to deny this application so categorically. It's just not your level of access to information, well, if you are who you want to appear to be, of course.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

Well, you claim that they are widely used. That's why I asked. Maybe you have some evidence.
Neither I nor my comrades from other units have ever encountered psychotropic drugs in first aid kits or anywhere else. And we took a lot of trophies. And we have never even heard of such a thing. But armchair experts claim that they do exist. There are no facts, though.

[Paranoid62]

Quote: Dmitry_Nemets

Well, you claim that they are widely used.

Quote into the studio, let's laugh together.

Quote: Dmitry_Nemets

Neither I nor my comrades from other units have ever encountered psychotropic drugs in first aid kits or anywhere else.

Enough. No need for lyricism. You have no reliable information on the topic, and cannot have any. But there is a desire to whitewash the Armed Forces of Ukraine from something ugly. Funny.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

Nope. It's you who want to attribute to everyone the use of mythical psychotropics. And all the "proofs" are like someone somewhere said it. And anyone who doubts is a cypriot and an enemy of the people. Let's finish with that.
When facts emerge, please report them.

[Paranoid62]

Quote: Dmitry_Nemets

you have a desire to attribute to all the use of mythical psychotropic drugs

Nope.

I had, and still have, a desire to find out whether you are who you are trying to pass yourself off as. Nothing more.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

Why find out when you have already decided that I am the enemy?

[Paranoid62]

Quote: Dmitry_Nemets

you have already decided that i am an enemy

It was you who said it, not me.

[Dmitry_Nemets]

That's how it is. For me, people like you are also enemies. Those who don't like and are afraid of the truth, who believe that all problems should be swept under the carpet. For whom anyone who expresses their opinion or disagrees with yours is Ukrainian and cipso or the 5th column.

[Paranoid62]

Quote: Dmitry_Nemets

For me, people like you are also enemies. Those who do not like and are afraid of the truth, who believe that all problems should be swept under the carpet.

Oh yeah. The best defense is a good offense, yeah.

Quote: Dmitry_Nemets

anyone who expresses their opinion or disagrees with yours is a Ukrainian and a tsipso or the 5th column

This is not true. Many people here know me and can confirm. No one here knows you yet... be careful with terminology, this is good advice.

[Wratch]

Yes, yes, yes! It was a mortar! It's a bastard! They didn't save her... they didn't let her go... how long did they tie the mine to her back?))))

[rotfuks]

they didn't bring it to that... how long did they tie the mine to her back?))))

Of course they didn't do a good job. They should have stuck the mine in her crotch. Especially since she had a place for it.

[Broad flag]

They arrive at the front line like that with mines in their heads. All that remains is to activate them in time when they cross the red lines of defense of the assigned area. The future has arrived, maybe not like in those movies that were shown to us, but the script tends to change as the play progresses.
In general, it's good that it didn't get there. Feed, judge, guard... Lots of fuss, little use. As experts have already written -1 enemy woman = -2 first-generation survivors and -4 in the next. It's a pity that the bombing is indiscriminate. The AI ​​is underperforming.

Quote from Wratch

Yes, yes, yes! It was a mortar! It's a bastard! They didn't save her... they didn't let her go... how long did they tie the mine to her back?))))

[Venara]

He raised his hands
But I didn't see it!
He was shouting that he was surrendering.
I haven't heard.

[Bulrumeb]

And it's good that she didn't get there. That's where she belongs.

[ZnachWest]

Why? Gender inequality again...

[the same doctor]

The Ukies resist to the last because they are not afraid of being captured. If you don't take prisoners, they will run away much faster.

[realist]

and thank God. I could have survived and returned to duty. But that's minus one operator.

[the same doctor]

The main thing is that the liberals don't foist another "Colonel Budanov" on us. They had to think of this: to convict an officer of a fighting army based on enemy testimony!!!