"America will find the battle slaves"

"America will find the battle slaves"“The regions that are likely to become the scene of conflicts are the Far East, the Near and Middle East, the post-Soviet space, first of all the Caucasus, Ukraine and some countries of Central Asia, Pakistan and India,” Viktor Kovalyov, secretary of the Academy of Military Sciences, told the VIEW newspaper . He does not exclude the beginning of the Third World War in the coming decade.

In the next decade, a new world war may break out on the planet, suggested Sergei Malkov, a member of the Academy of Military Sciences, MSU professor. As the newspaper VIEW reported, the professor spoke at the first meeting of the working group on training for the defense industrial complex of the coordination council on youth affairs in the scientific and educational spheres. The working group was established under the auspices of the Presidential Council on Science and Education.

“What situation are we in? The end of the fifth wave of Kondratieff and the transition to the sixth technological order. In the coming 10 years, strong political and technological instability is waiting for us, ”said Malkov, adding that countries that do not have time to move from the fifth to the sixth technological cycle will lag behind in technological development by 50 years.

Recall the theory of large cycles or waves developed by the Soviet economist Nikolai Kondratiev. According to it, in the global economy there are periodic cycles of 40 – 60 years, each of which consists of alternating phases of relatively high and relatively low rates of economic growth.

Viktor Kovalev, scientific secretary of the section of the Academy of Military Sciences, Candidate of Technical Sciences, winner of the Leninist Komsomol Award, told the newspaper VZGLYAD how serious the forecasts are and whether there are any prerequisites for another world war today.

Section Secretary of the Academy of Military Sciences Viktor Kovalev
VIEW: Viktor Ivanovich, your colleague from the Academy believes that the world is completing "the fifth wave of Kondratieff and moving on to the sixth technological order." Do you agree?

Viktor Kovalev: Malkov said that there are certain laws. Now at about the same time, the Kondratieff cycle ends (40 – 60 years), the Juggler cycle (7 – 12 years), the Kuznets cycle (16 – 25 years). Retrospective analysis of the world stories shows that at such times a “big war” is very likely. This is a time of great political instability. The world is waiting for big changes, the more there is the United States, which "big war" is very necessary. It solves many problems at once connected with financial bubbles, with redistribution of role functions in the world and so on. As historical experience shows, the United States has twice solved its problems at the expense of the “big war”.

This does not mean that the armada of aircraft and cruise missiles will be immediately used, atomic bombs will explode. War can also occur in other areas, for example, in the mental sphere, with the unrestricted use of other means, including with the initiation of terrorist activity in the territory of the enemy. But it does not become less destructive.

VIEW: Will the term “soft power” be a thing of the past?

V.К .: “Soft power” is, as a rule, a misleading term. In the classical sense, it is connected with the fact that the country is increasing its goodwill. In the simplest sense, this term means "good name." Having a high goodwill, she can "gently manage" in the latent phases of interstate conflicts. And when a country organizes the direct use of means of direct influence on an adversary, and this may not be material, but also mental, this is already a war.

For example, the implementation of “managed chaos” technologies (Mann) on the world stage is that “soft power”? Bombs do not explode, but, nevertheless, population losses are terrible. The use of controlled chaos technology is comparable to weapons mass destruction.

"America will find the battle slaves"

By the way, it is interesting to note that these technologies are an “Anglo-Saxon invention,” the British began to develop them. In 1943, the well-known physicist, mathematician, aerodynamic Owen Uillans Richardson, under the bombs in London, decided that than to fight the enemy directly on the field, it’s better, before anticipating, to organize the destruction of his military-industrial potential without direct collision. And he didn’t just decide, but worked out the relevant scientific and theoretical principles.

VIEW: But are the current conditions suitable for the start of open hostilities?

V.К .: In its strategic concept, NATO has significantly expanded the concept of the fundamental “fifth article” of its charter, which defines the conditions under which military force can be used. There appeared such new formulations that almost unlimitedly expand the conditions of military reaction: these are hacker attacks, and infringement of the interests of the business of NATO member states, and many other things that were not previously related to the concept of “external aggression”, but now this is an excuse for the outbreak of hostilities.

It is impossible not to notice the elementary fact that the formulations in the new strategic concept of NATO are such that NATO members can quite arbitrarily determine their own guilty country and begin to "defend themselves" from it. That is, the base for further action is already being prepared.

Malkov and other scientists do not predict a war, they say that this is very likely due to the nature of the cyclical changes in the world system. Science speaks about this, and this is not just his personal opinion.

VIEW: Someone other than the United States, now may be a new "arsonist" of war?

V.К .: One of the most famous presidents of the United States said the following: “We must organize a war in such a way that everyone thinks that we care about anything other than peace.” That is, the US can beautifully organize a war with someone else’s hands, while they themselves can join it already in a more favorable position. It is they, strictly speaking, who have done it several times before, having entered the World War I in 1917, and in World War II - in the 1941. Currently, the “prelude of a big war” is seen, first of all, in the Middle East.

Trying to play the "Chinese gambit"

Now Turkey actively wants to consolidate its future geopolitical status. France is active. If you look impartially, then it is clear that France is “climbing” into all the events of the so-called Arab spring. And if the events in Tunisia can somehow be called a “spontaneous popular revolt”, then the events in all other countries of the Middle East and the Maghreb are a classic covert operation of the special services, later supported by Western armed forces, primarily France. Unfortunately, there are many people willing to war, especially if it is profitable and safe. So, for the start of a big war, America will find battle slaves for themselves.

In the Asia-Pacific region, the situation is more complicated. Here, in my opinion, America is trying to play a kind of "Chinese gambit". So form a situation to direct the aspirations of China in the north direction. But the Chinese are an old, wise, experienced nation, they are not so easily pushed. But in general, there are still no serious factors indicating the preparation of a “big war”.

VIEW: What about North Korea? Or will it be limited to belligerent rhetoric?

V.К .: Poor North Korea wants only one thing: to be left alone. All her demarches are ways of reflexive control, opposition to the subjects of conflict. In addition, one can not ignore the fact that for almost 70 years they actually live in wartime conditions, an external blockade. Naturally, the nerves can pass.

Korea itself first will not climb. This is a very peaceful country. In the Korean ethnic mentality dogmatic grounds for aggressive behavior are completely absent. The leaders of Korea are not idiots. The external aggressiveness of the state, as can be shown on the basis of the theory of reflexive control of Lefebvre, is a rational behavioral strategy of the weak.

In fact, from the point of view of “high science”, the strong should behave more peacefully and calmly. But the weak should behave aggressively and imitate the possibility of causing some unacceptable damage. But this does not mean that the weak will get into a fight. No, they strive to achieve some of their local goals and that’s all.

Korea needs food, energy, and so that they are not touched, that their “demigods” remain alive and more or less steadily in power, so that no one can push them away using “high humanitarian technologies”.

VIEW: And how, for example, will change the political map of Europe and the whole world to 2050 year?

VK: I do not presume to judge. Africa must change a lot. There is a great potential for conflict. Other changes are difficult to predict. At the same time, I want to note that now there are methods of external government of the country without its direct seizure; it is possible to “milk” the country without the introduction of armed forces. If we talk about specific countries, then Iraq is likely to fall apart, everything goes towards this.

VIEW: And in what corner of the planet do you think a new world conflict will arise?

V.К .: Regions that are likely to become the scene of conflicts are the Far East, the Near and Middle East, the post-Soviet space, first of all the Caucasus, Ukraine and some countries of Central Asia, Pakistan and India.

The large-scale conflicts in question, as in the previous cycles, initiate important geopolitical and geo-economic changes, which in the end, apparently, will lead to the formation of a new world order and a new model of globalization.

# {weapon} The way out of the global crisis of 2008 – 2010 will most likely not lead to stable growth, and already in this and next year a new global economic crisis is very likely. The 2013 – 2014 crisis, as well as similar crises in previous cycles, is likely to lead to significant social and political destabilization, social upheavals and military conflicts.

In the period 2014 – 2025. Large geopolitical and geo-economic shifts (the known analogue of these shifts are shifts of the period 1937 – 1955) are very likely, which will open opportunities for the global spread of the latest and “breakthrough” technologies.

At the same time, the role of the United States and other Western countries may decrease, while the role of China, India and other countries of the East may, on the contrary, increase. The most difficult for Russia in geopolitical terms, if guided by structural similarity with the preceding cycles, is likely to be the period of 2014 – 2025. It is necessary to prepare for the upheavals of this period right now. First and foremost, prepare an adequate strategic deterrent potential.

Reincarnation of the colonial system

In addition, it is necessary to point to the emerging foreign policy trend of a kind of reincarnation of the colonial system. There used to be a colonial system, it collapsed. We have lived quite a bit without her - less than a century. Let's be frank. In the first place, the collapse of the colonial system was influenced by the formation and strengthening of the USSR, the world socialist system. Now we see the beginning of the reverse process, again colonial dependence will be restored, perhaps not only in the classical, but also in some other form.

VIEW: Malkov threatened that countries that do not have time to move from the fifth to the sixth technological cycle, lag behind in technological development for 50 years. What countries will not be able to go and what will happen to them?

V.К .: Many will not succeed. Russia, for example, is still not strengthened in the fifth technological order. It depends on the effectiveness of national governments and other factors. But Africa, most likely, will not be able to move to a new cycle: they still have not reached the fourth order. They are likely to be a colony, perhaps a new type of colony.

VIEW: How are these cycles calculated?

V.К .: The study takes place not at the level of humanitarian discourse, but at the level of building mathematical models. Exploration of the future is carried out on the basis of widespread use of mathematics. At the MSU site, a study was launched on “Integrated Systems Analysis and Modeling of World Dynamics”, briefly called the “Sadovnichy-Akayev program”.

I would like to note that the rant Club of Rome (International Public Organization, engaged in large-scale research, mainly in the socio-economic field - approx. VIEW) is “resting” here. According to its methodological level, it is not suitable "and on hold" of this program. The level of scientific study is quite different. The program deals with economics, conflict management, political science, demography, ecology, and many other global problems - all based on the use of mathematical models.

One of the results of this program indicates that the future is far from being benign. This, of course, does not mean “the end of history”, but rather possible gigantic upheavals. And this can be shown based on the use of mathematical modeling of global processes.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. fenix57
    April 13 2013 07: 47
    Well, let’s be sure that Russia will gain a foothold in the fifth technological order; leadership of the former republics of the former USSR gain lost reason and vision will unite and offer NATO countries not to poke their nose where their dog ... does not stick.
    Judging by the layout in the article of the state, the BRICS participants, if they wish, can (forget the internecine strife) put amers in the coffin and cover them with a lid.
    And Russia is sure it has an adequate strategic deterrence potential up its sleeve. hi
    1. Hunghuz
      April 13 2013 10: 20
      In the event of an American attack on Kareya, Pabidit China is assigned) and 500 thousand volunteers under the UN flag .........)))
      1. +5
        April 13 2013 15: 43
        Quote: Hunghouse
        In the event of an American attack on Kareya, Pabidit China is assigned) and 500 thousand volunteers under the UN flag .........)))

        Why does the US need an attack on the Far Eastern "Bin Laden"? The DPRK, with its attacks, "justifies" the pumping of missile defense on the borders of Russia and China. The more Comrade Y stomps his feet, the "calmer" is the intensified militarization of Japan as an ally of the United States.
        1. +1
          April 13 2013 22: 07
          Quite right, the principle - see to whom it is profitable here is faithful one hundred percent.
    2. Quiet
      April 13 2013 16: 46
      «We must organize the war in such a way that everyone believes that we care about nothing else but peace. ” That is, the United States can beautifully organize a war by someone else’s hands, and they themselves can enter the war in a more favorable position.

      Even in kindergarten they know that the evil empire is the USA !!! wassat ... And in America they rule only with the diagnosis "DOWN" belay Here is a living example for you
  2. +5
    April 13 2013 07: 51
    One of the famous US presidents said the following: "We must organize the war so that everyone believes that we care about nothing else but the world."
    No abusive words
    Here's how to convey it to the different opposition figures, that with batons from the police and very soon they will be raking away from the citizens and obviously not green wrappers. Maybe the crumbs will fall and everything will be hidden by them every time and ideological inspirers
    1. Vovka levka
      April 13 2013 10: 43
      Do you believe that?
      Even if there are such thoughts, they are never spoken anywhere. Especially the president. This is the alphabet.
  3. +6
    April 13 2013 09: 28
    The article is a huge plus! Everything is clearly and clearly stated. Unfortunately, the leadership of "some" countries thinks only about the welfare of their families. And they do not understand that all their well-being will soon be covered with a copper basin. We need to prepare and we need to prepare the people for such a provoked cataclysm
  4. +3
    April 13 2013 09: 39
    Here it’s even unnecessary to be some kind of physicist to make the only right conclusion. You just need to eliminate the customer of this war, not the army armed to the teeth, or create a huge number of problems so that your head hurts about something else.
  5. Kaa
    April 13 2013 09: 47
    The Americans respect only and exclusively strength, and even lesser in comparison with them and the willingness to fight for their country. Once again, a tiny (worldwide) DPRK has demonstrated this. The U.S. is backtracking: Secretary of State John Kerry’s Friday statement that the US would not accept North Korea with nuclear weapons did not lead to any new strategy on how to prevent such a situation. The US’s recent demand for North Korea to cease nuclear weapons was put forward by the predecessors of the Obama administration, but has not led to any positive results in two decades, analysts say. According to Bruce Klingner, a former director of the CIA’s Korean bureau currently working for the Heritage Foundation, Obama’s actions, such as stopping joint military exercises with South Korea amid threats from the DPRK, are likely to spur this country. “North Korea is taking a few steps forward, and we are moving back a step. This for them only confirms that the US will retreat, ”Klingner says. The North threatens to turn South Korea into an "ocean of fire" and launch nuclear weapons in the direction of the United States. North Korea has a technology for creating nuclear weapons, and the country has already conducted tests to launch long-range missiles. This week, North Korea delivered the launcher to the point where the rocket would be able to reach US forces on Guam. Japanese news agency Kyodo quoted a senior Japanese army official as saying that the North Korean Musudan launcher had been elevated off the DPRK east coast. The United States claimed that North Korea’s missiles are not capable of reaching continental America, but the country is approaching the creation of an intercontinental missile capable of this. As Kerry said, “we will protect our allies,” South Korea and Japan, “and we will protect ourselves.” According to him, President Obama ordered "not to conduct" several military exercises, and the United States "significantly tempered its rhetoric" in an attempt to "find a path to the triumph of prudence." According to Klingner, such talk is counterproductive. “North Korea will look back on its history and see that every time it attacks, the United States and South Korea are inferior,” he said. “In the past, not responding to the DPRK by military means, the United States and South Korea tried to return to negotiations and offered concessions to reduce the level of tension raised by North Korea.”
    : http://www.inosmi.ru/world/20130413/208027896.html#ixzz2QJrWqK6D
    This is the best example to all the countries that are mentioned in the article as a place of unleashing a world war.
    1. Vovka levka
      April 13 2013 10: 48
      To blackmail, you should never give in, under any circumstances. Otherwise, this will lead to a wave of even greater blackmail and even greater human and material losses.
      In this matter, Putin is well done, there are no questions.
  6. +6
    April 13 2013 09: 54
    "America will find war slaves" - will try in any case ...
    But, every day their vitality flows away:
    - "smart Jews" with their money (Rhodschilds) left them and are accommodated in the Asia-Pacific zone,
    - LGBT forces - nullify the human potential of the white race. The American Church - this movement supports (homosexuals). Already, 50% of newly born sysyya children are provided by blacks, who make up only 10% of their population. In 20 years, more than 50% - will consist of African-Americans.
    - The loss of $ -USA status of world currency is happening before our eyes. With all this, there is practically no industrial industry on their territory, everything has been brought to China and Asia ...

    Let's see if they have enough determination to leave "not in English", i.e. slamming the door ...
  7. Vovka levka
    April 13 2013 10: 53
    Do you know the difference between an analyst and an ordinary person?
    A simple person (scientist, expert), he looks at the things of his bell tower.
    An analyst, he studies the opponent’s logic and worldview and makes an analysis based on this knowledge.
    This article is not analytics, and its value is almost nil.
  8. fenix57
    April 13 2013 11: 25
    Quote: Kaa
    US backs up: Secretary of State John Kerry’s Friday statement that the US would not accept North Korea with nuclear weapons did not lead to any new strategy on how to prevent this from happening.

    All these "body movements" of amers only confirm the following words: “We must organize the war so that everyone believes that we care about nothing else but peace”- which was expressed by one of the famous presidents of the United States. By the way news:US Secretary of State John Kerry arrived in Beijing on an official visit, where he will try to convince the Chinese of the need to put pressure on their allies in Pyongyang, force them to soften rhetoric and return to negotiations on nuclear issues. see: http: //www.gazeta.ru/news/
    And now the amers will convince the Chinese leadership about how "white and fluffy" they are, and the DPRK is a manifestation of absolute evil ...
    1. Kaa
      April 13 2013 13: 11
      Quote: fenix57
      And now the amers will convince the Chinese leadership about how "white and fluffy" they are, and the DPRK is a manifestation of absolute evil
      "John Bolton, a former US representative to the UN under President George W. Bush, believes that the only way to prevent a situation in which the DPRK will have nuclear weapons and use the country for threats and blackmail in the region is US-China collaboration to collapse North Korean regime and the unification of the two Koreas.China, which provides 90% of the fuel in the DPRK, and also provides the lion's share of food for the country and is its only ally, not counting Iran, perceives North Korea as a useful “buffer” separating US troops from the Chinese border. China is worried that if the North Korean regime falls, millions of hungry refugees will move to China. However, according to Bolton, recently in the state-controlled Chinese media and research publications there have been ideas about how to stop providing assistance to the DPRK. American diplomats should work with China to convince him of security, promise assistance for refugees and urge the population to stay in North Korea, Bolton said. North Korea’s collapse is in China’s interests, he says. “The difference is that now nuclear North Korea is indeed a threat to China,” says Bolton. - For several years, he says that he does not want the DPRK to have the opportunity to create and launch nuclear weapons, because this will lead to instability on the peninsula and economic problems in North-East Asia. China is right. "North Korea is now ready to test a missile, which, according to the US Department of Defense Intelligence Agency, is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead."
      According to Klingner, the US must respond to the threat with a promise to protect its allies and expand sanctions to further worsen the situation and isolate the North Korean regime.
  9. Gorchakov
    April 13 2013 11: 45
    You wish to have a peaceful future, get ready for war ... !!!
  10. +5
    April 13 2013 12: 53
    Finally, an ideology will emerge uniting all the inhabitants of the country, all its peoples, and setting an intelligible course of development and an ultimate goal, then Russia will bypass all the troubles! And now we live like a swan, cancer and pike, and therefore everyone finds war slaves for himself. We, as a country, must finally understand - that we must have our own road, and we have everything necessary for successful advancement along this road!
  11. amp
    April 13 2013 14: 36
    How tired of these croaking crows ... well, what is the third world war involving Russia, if Russia has nuclear weapons? These should be in a mental hospital, and not give interviews.
    1. +2
      April 13 2013 19: 19
      Immediately after the Second World War, one Soviet colonel (later the father of the Russian special forces) made a prediction of what the wars of the late 20th and early 21st centuries would look like. He wrote that in view of the presence of nuclear weapons in all major states, a global conflict between them becomes impossible in because of the global destruction of all parties involved. Due to this, the battle will take place on the territory of third-country states with the involvement of small highly qualified forces and trained soldiers. The term special forces was simply not there at that time. Everything that happens fits into that concept. Unfortunately, the monograph is purely for special use , I read the current separate chapters of that monograph on the wiki. If someone suddenly has a full version, please give out in full or give a link.
  12. +2
    April 13 2013 23: 16
    America, has long found its slaves, in the person of those who belong to pro-Western opposition!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"