Passions around the Valley of the Fallen

10 501 29
Passions around the Valley of the Fallen

On March 28, 1939, Republican Madrid fell. On April 19, Generalissimo Franco solemnly declared the end of the Spanish Civil War, and on May XNUMX, a grand Victory Parade was held in Madrid. Tens of thousands of soldiers marched through the streets: Spaniards, Moroccans, Franco's allies Italians and Germans, volunteers from Portugal, Ireland, Russian White émigrés. Columns of equipment, including captured Tanks Soviet-made, six hundred aircraft, including Soviet models, paraded in the sky. Spain entered a more than 36-year period of Franco's totalitarian regime.


Victory Parade in Madrid, May 19, 1939, Italians marching

The country was in dire straits, hunger and poverty, the economy was in ruins. The caudillo regime was almost completely isolated internationally, and could only hope for support from Germany and Italy, but these countries were sinking deeper and deeper into the quagmire of the Second World War, and Spain was clearly not their priority.



Nevertheless, Franco decided to embark on a project of truly cyclopean proportions – the construction of a memorial complex at an altitude of 1300 m above sea level in the Cuelgamuros Valley in the Sierra de Guadarrama Mountains, called the Valley of the Fallen (Valle de los Caídos), 58 km from Madrid. This location was probably not chosen by chance – ten kilometers away is the architectural ensemble of El Escorial, built in 1563-1584 by decision of the Spanish King Philip II. The ensemble, included in the list of World Heritage Sites, includes a royal palace, a monastery and a royal burial vault.

On April 1, 1940, the anniversary of the Nationalist victory in the Civil War, Caudillo Franco issued a decree announcing a plan to build in the Cuelgamuros area "a basilica, a monastery and youth barracks... to perpetuate the memory of those who fell in our glorious Crusade."

In the middle of the same year, three construction companies under the direction of the architect Pedro Muguruza (after his death in 1950, Diego Mendez took over the construction) began work, in which 20 people took part. It is widely believed that slave labor of Republican prisoners of war and political prisoners was used, but this does not quite correspond to the facts. Prisoners were allowed to participate in the work only from 000, and on a voluntary basis (for participation in the construction, prison terms were reduced) and with payment of wages (1943 pesetas per day, although most of this money was deducted for food, accommodation, etc.). According to a number of historians, from 2,85 to 1800 prisoners took part in the construction, most of whom worked in the Valley until 2000.




Political prisoners at the construction of a memorial

The labor of political prisoners was used according to the rules of the General Directorate for the Redemption of Punishments through Labor (Patronato Central de Redención de Penas por el Trabajo), an organization that made it possible to use political prisoners as labor in exchange for a reduced sentence.

The claims of opponents of the Franco regime that an innumerable number of political prisoners died during the construction of the memorial also raise doubts. According to information available to the author, 14 people died in accidents during the construction. How can one not recall the legends of Russian would-be historians about the millions of GULAG prisoners who laid down their lives during the construction of the White Sea Canal and other construction projects of socialism? Or the ravings of the "beacon of Russian democracy" Solzhenitsyn.

The amount of work that had to be done was enormous: just to create the basilica, which is larger than St. Peter's Basilica in the Vatican, it was necessary to remove 200 cubic meters of rock from the depths of the Cerro de la Nava mountain.


Cerro de la Nava mountain before the construction of the Memorial


Construction process

The construction dragged on for 18 years, both due to technical and financial difficulties, and as a result of the aftermath of the Civil and Second World Wars and the subsequent isolation of the country. At that time, Spain had to follow the idea of ​​self-sufficiency - the policy of autarky (this is in many ways akin to our "import substitution policy").

Step by step, the impoverished agrarian country acquired its modern shipbuilding, aircraft and automobile manufacturing, and the production of modern weapons. The state-owned airline Iberia appeared (so many of our tourists flew on its planes), the world-famous Navantia (modern name) for its shipbuilding and many other things, the SEAT automobile plant, Telefonica and many others. And all of this was state property! The country acquired a network of high-speed highways and railways. The standard of living of the majority of the population of Spain rose.

Although the construction of the memorial was completed in August 1958, the official pompous opening with the presence of the head of state (Jefe del Estado) Francisco Franco took place on April 1, 1959 - the 20th anniversary of the end of the war.


Memorial in the Valley of the Fallen

During the many years of construction, the internal policy of the Francoist regime also changed, which from the second half of the 50s began to weaken political repression against the opposition and try to pursue a policy of "reconciliation" (reconciliación) between the opposing parties of the Civil War of 1936-1939. Since 1956, similar proposals have come from the leadership of the Spanish Communist Party. The memorial in the Valley of the Fallen was now presented not as a symbol of victory in the "Crusade for Liberation", but as a monument to all those who fell in this conflict and a symbol of national reconciliation.

The memorial is, without a doubt, one of the architectural, religious and historical wonders of the world. It consists of the following main elements: an esplanade, a basilica with a mausoleum, a Benedictine monastery with a hotel and a church boarding school, and the largest cross in the world crowning it all. The construction of this memorial complex cost 1 pesetas (equivalent to approximately 159 million modern euros). The sculptures by Juan de Avalos cost another 505 pesetas.

From the esplanade, which covers an area of ​​30,6 m², a huge, richly decorated bronze door leads into the Basilica of Santa Cruz del Valle de los Caidos, carved into the rock, which is 262 meters long and reaches a maximum height of 42 meters.


Entrance to the basilica

A long passage with side chapels and walls decorated with tapestries and frescoes depicting the saints - patrons of the Army, Fleet, the Air Force and the Civil Guard, leads to the main altar, at the foot of which were formerly the tombs of Francisco Franco and José Antonio Primo de Rivera. Just before entering the main church space, two huge statues of angels with swords guard the entrance, like the angels of Paradise.


Main passage


The patron saint of the fleet, the Holy Virgin of Carmen


One of Ra's angelsя








Elements of the Basilica

A huge dome, 42 m high and 40,75 m in diameter, has been erected above the main altar. It is decorated with mosaic paintings by the artist Santiago Padros, consisting of 6 million ceramic elements. The paintings depict biblical scenes, as well as a brief outline of the entire history of Spain as a Catholic nation and depict the victims of the Civil War of 1936-1939. The artist also placed an image of himself with his wife here.




Mosaic paintings of the dome

On either side of the main altar are the entrances to two underground chapels (chapels), which contain the remains of 33 victims of the Spanish Civil War. The underground spaces also house a center for the detection of earthquakes and other scientific research by the Laboratory of Geodynamics and Earth Tides of the Faculty of Mathematical Sciences of the Complutense University of Madrid and the Higher Council of Scientific Research.

Naturally, many myths and legends have arisen around the dungeons of the basilica. Some claim that some sacred treasure of Franco is kept there, others - top-secret documents of the regime.

The memorial complex is crowned by the world's largest cross, 150 meters high and with a crossbar 46 meters long. It can be seen from a distance of up to 40 km. The cross is made of reinforced concrete (45 tons of concrete and 000 tons of steel reinforcement), covered with carved stone slabs. It can withstand winds of up to 8 km/h. Inside the cross there is a spiral staircase and an elevator.


Cross

This outstanding work of architecture and engineering is complemented by the sculptures located on the base of the cross, conceived and executed by Juan de Avalos: the images of the four evangelists (Saint John, Saint Luke, Saint Mark and Saint Matthew) 18 m high and the four cardinal virtues (Justice, Fortitude, Prudence and Temperance) 16 m high.


Sculptures on the base of the cross

The foot of the Cross can be reached by funicular or by a staircase with 738 steps. In addition, a limited-use lift allows access to the Cross through the interior of the mountain.

On the opposite side of the mountain from the entrance to the basilica is the majestic complex of the Benedictine monastery, whose monks are entrusted with the maintenance of the basilica. The monastery also houses a 120-bed hotel with a library of 20 volumes (!) and a boarding school.


Benedictine monastery

To ensure that the idea of ​​reconciliation was not merely metaphorical, the Francoist regime decided to exhume the remains of those killed on both sides of the Civil War from graves in various parts of the country and bury them in the largest mass grave in Spain, the Valley of the Fallen. This measure was approved in December 1957 by the Workers' Council of the Monument to the Fallen, and the transfer of bodies to Cuelgamuros began in 1959.

According to official data, the Valley of the Fallen now contains the remains of 33 people from both sides (including 833 women). The bodies were exhumed from mass graves or tombs (in many cases without the consent of relatives), transferred to the basilica with the assistance of Benedictine monks and buried in so-called columbaria. The remains of 157 people have not yet been identified (identification work is ongoing). According to many researchers, the actual number of those buried in the Valley may be as high as 12-410. The last burial took place on July 50, 70.

On March 30, 1959, the remains of the founder of the Spanish Falange, José Antonio Primo de Rivera, who was shot by the Republicans on November 20, 1936, were transferred to the memorial basilica. His coffin was carried by his supporters for 17 kilometers from the previous burial site in El Escorial.


Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera




Francisco Franco during the Civil War

On November 23, 1975, Francisco Franco's body was buried in the Basilica of the Valley of the Fallen. The funeral ceremony was attended by 100 people! It is doubtful that any modern Spanish politician will be able to collect even a tenth of this number after his death.


Franco's tomb in the Valley of the Fallen

For many years, the Valley of the Fallen was the site of solemn religious masses in memory of the fallen and Franco himself, and solemn ceremonies of the Spanish Falange. But over time, the PSOE (Spanish Socialist Workers' Party), which had long forgotten both socialism and the working class, came to power and began to fight against any symbols of the former regime. How nice it is to kick a dead lion!

In 2007, the Socialist government issued the "Law of Historical Memory", Article 16 of which was dedicated to the Valley of the Fallen. "The Valley of the Fallen will be strictly regulated by the rules normally applicable to places of worship and public cemeteries", and that nowhere in the territory "actions of a political nature may be carried out". The aim was to neutralize the Francoist value of the monument and limit it to a religious status.

In 2018, the PSOE and Pedro Sánchez came to power after a period of government by the People's Party, which advocated maintaining the "status quo" of the Memorial. One of the ideas of the new government was to promote the removal of Francisco Franco's remains from the Valley of the Fallen. To this end, a new section was added to the "Historical Memory Law", which established that "only the remains of people who died as a result of the Spanish Civil War may be in the Valley of the Fallen". After long legal disputes, with the intervention of the Supreme Court of Spain, the European Court of Justice and the protests of the family, Francisco Franco's remains were transferred to the family basilica on 24 October 2019.


Franco's mausoleum at the cemetery in Mingorrubio

On April 23, 2023, the same thing was done with the remains of Primo de Rivera, although he clearly did not fall under the "Historical Memory Law" since he was executed during the Civil War for "participation in a rebellion against the Republic."

Some consider the Memorial a symbol of Francoism and dictatorship, others - a Memorial of Reconciliation and a mass grave for those killed in the bloody civil war.

The fight against the Memorial continues to this day, right up to radical ideas about its... demolition. I wonder if the "radicals" are going to find the colossal funds for this themselves?
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    4 July 2025 07: 19
    a grand Victory Parade. Tens of thousands of soldiers marched through the streets: Spaniards, Moroccans, Franco's allies Italians and Germans, volunteers from Portugal, Ireland, Russian White émigrés

    Russian emigrants fought on both sides, as did Germans, Italians, etc.

    How can one not recall here the legends of domestic would-be historians about the millions of GULAG prisoners who laid down their lives during the construction of the White Sea Canal and other construction projects of socialism.

    With the official published figures of prisoners and special settlers who died from malnutrition, scurvy, pellagra, backbreaking labor at the construction sites of Magnitka, Vorkuta, Norilsk, etc., there would be no “legends”.

    How nice it is to kick a dead lion!

    And what is so lion-like about the fascist Franco?

    The scale of the senseless 20-year work is, of course, astounding - why develop hundreds of thousands of cubic meters of rock in the mountains to perpetuate memory - it is incomprehensible. It turned out beautiful, like in the subway, but why?
    1. 0
      4 July 2025 08: 27
      "It turned out beautiful, like in the metro, but why?"
      This is typical of all authoritarian/totalitarian regimes - the sacralization of power, "bonds", etc.
      1. +2
        4 July 2025 12: 58
        Quote: ohka
        This is typical of all authoritarian/totalitarian regimes

        This is typical for all regimes: the Palace of Invalids in France, the Memorials of Germany, England, etc.

        Mountains - why stir up hundreds of thousands of cubic meters of rock from the mine?
        1. +4
          4 July 2025 16: 07
          Quote: Olgovich

          Mountains - why stir up hundreds of thousands of cubic meters of rock from the mine?

          One option was to deliberately extend the construction period so that passions would subside by the time the memorial was opened. In essence, it worked...
    2. +4
      4 July 2025 19: 46
      Official figures have long been published and are freely available. And they differ greatly from the data of Memorial, Solzhenitsyn, etc. Thus, instead of tens of millions of "zeks" in the 1930-1940s, the actual average number of prisoners in the entire USSR was about 900 thousand people. And in the Russian Federation alone in 1992-2002 it was 940 thousand! And all sorts of anti-Sovietists overestimated the mortality rate among prisoners by tens of times. For example, it was repeatedly stated that in 1932, 100 thousand people (!) died at the construction site of the White Sea Canal, while according to NKVD reports - 2066 people. And so on and so forth.
      1. -3
        5 July 2025 10: 38
        Quote: Alexander Mitrofanov
        The official figures have long been published and are freely available.

        1.there are no such official there are still no figures - there are studies by historians.

        2. These figures should have been published after the construction of the objects was completed. So that the price would be known.
        Quote: Alexander Mitrofanov
        Thus, instead of tens of millions of "zeks" in the 1930-1940s, the actual average number of prisoners in the entire USSR was about 900 thousand people.

        none instead: many millions went through the GULAG, and also prisoners of prisons, the extrajudicial exile of millions of peasants and peoples, political exiles - and millions died because of this.

        Quote: Alexander Mitrofanov
        And all sorts of anti-Sovietists inflated the mortality rate among prisoners by tens of times
        And all sorts of advisers underestimated the mortality rate among prisoners by tens of times - in addition to the tens of thousands who died at the White Sea Canal from hunger, lice, and disease, many were simply shot - for escapes, evasion, etc.

        And don’t forget that many of the repressed, when attempting rehabilitation, were surprised to discover that they were NOT listed as such ANYWHERE and had to go to court, proving their arrest, exile and slave labor.
    3. -1
      4 July 2025 22: 46
      Quote: Olgovich
      And what is so lion-like about the fascist Franco?

      Unlike Hitler, Mussolini, Himmler, Goering, the Greek black colonels, Pinochet, Bandera, Petliura, he did not live to see the collapse of his totalitarian regime. Most of his supporters were executed, the lucky ones committed suicide or were simply removed from power. Until Franco's corpse was exhumed from the Valley of the Francoists, the Nazis could claim that the followers of Nazi and fascist ideas had a chance to win.
  2. +12
    4 July 2025 08: 37
    A good informative article, but with a nod to Caudillo.

    I was visiting relatives in Spain for a while, trying to make friends with the locals who knew English. I was warned about three undesirable topics for discussion with the Spanish -
    1) be interested in the interlocutor’s wife (where she works, what kind of housewife she is, etc.)
    2) bullfight
    3) the civil war in general and Franco in particular....

    The caudillo is one of the most complex and controversial figures of the 20th century.

    He definitely had one virtue, no matter how you look at it: he was smart and had an excellent ability to adapt to the international situation.
    He managed to be friends with Hitler, and with Mussolini, and later with the Americans (bases, NATO), and even with the USSR (a base for Soviet merchant ships in Los Palmos, sailor acquaintances shared their impressions) - at the end of his reign.
    He established a broad cultural exchange with the USSR, the songs of sweet Raphael were adored by all Soviet housewives, and the film with his participation, "The Way They Say..." was also unusually popular.

    Franco also experienced bloody dictators and managed to lay the foundations for modern democracy in Spain before his death - despite his entourage, who, after the death of Caudillo in 1981, raised an armed rebellion due to disagreement with his democratic ideas.
    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%8B%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%B2_%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_23_%D1%84%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8F_1981_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0

    The main question for me, apparently, does not have a clear answer - what if the Republic with its extremely motley political leadership (from anarchists to liberals, from Stalinist communists to obvious Trotskyists) had won that civil war? What next? Most likely a new civil war, showdowns and a struggle for power between the victorious, but temporary situational allies, the anarchist fraternity alone with its own army is worth something... So Caudillo may have been right in some ways, although "No passaran!" was sacred for many...

    Hemingway was a war correspondent in besieged Madrid and, hot on the heels of this, wrote his famous play, The Fifth Column, about the Republican counterintelligence service and the public it had to fight against...

    On photo:
    Anarchist armored cars on parade in Madrid
    1. +12
      4 July 2025 11: 06
      Quote: Timofey Charuta
      He managed to be friends with Hitler, and with Mussolini, and later with the Americans (bases, NATO), and even with the USSR (a base for Soviet merchant ships in Los Palmos, sailor acquaintances shared their impressions) - at the end of his reign.

      Moreover, the caudillo was friends with both Hitler and the Americans. smile
      Franco maneuvered between the drops cleaner than Mikoyan. On the one hand, it was necessary not to fall under the steamroller of the Reich, which had conquered all of Europe. On the other hand, it was necessary not to spoil relations with the USA, which had provided a grain loan and were the only source of food for Spain, whose agriculture was in deep trouble after the Civil War. At the same time, the Americans clearly bet on Britain in WWII, so any tilt towards Adolf meant the cessation of supplies. And the Reich had an army, but no grain. None at all - Germany's grain balance in 1941 was reduced to zero only under the condition of robbing the USSR.
      Oh yes, there was also domestic politics. In which, on the one hand, there was the Falange, some of whose members dreamed of drowning Spain in the blood of purges, and Franco was suspiciously leftist for them. And on the other hand, there were the leftists and nationalists, who even after their defeat controlled part of Spain.
      So Franco was veering between Scylla and Charybdis. First, he stalled negotiations with the Reich regarding entering the war and taking Gibraltar, putting forward exorbitant territorial demands. Although, it would seem, what could be better for a dictator than a small victorious war and the return of long-since torn away ancestral territories? But no - hunger in the long run turned out to be a more compelling argument. And in order to appease the angry Adolf, the caudillo sent the "Blue Division" to the USSR. This solved two problems at once: he improved relations with the Reich and sent the ultra-right radicals away from Spain.
      Forward to war with communism, take revenge on the Russians for our Civil War (*whisper to the side... and lay down your wild heads there, you are not needed here at all).
      Oh yeah, and they even managed to send some Spanish commies to the USSR. smile
      1. -3
        4 July 2025 17: 14
        Quote: Alexey RA
        This solved two problems at once: it improved relations with the Reich and sent the ultra-right radicals away from Spain.
        Forward to war with communism, take revenge on the Russians for our Civil War (*whispering to the side... and lay down your wild heads there, you are not needed here at all)

        People ready to fight in ALIEN country - are dangerous for any government. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why our "Spaniards" were also thinned out quite a bit when they returned to the USSR.
      2. 0
        5 July 2025 05: 29
        That's right. And some people are screaming that the Anglo-Saxons supported Hitler with supplies through Spain throughout the war. If only he would fight the USSR longer. As if they themselves weren't fighting the Reich. Everything rested on Gibraltar. In any case, Churchill claimed exactly that in his "The Second World War".
      3. -1
        6 July 2025 19: 44
        Falange = left anti-capitalist movement, read the works of Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera (can be found in Russian translation). Similar to Bakunin and Makhno.
        1. 0
          7 July 2025 16: 32
          Quote: Alexander Mitrofanov
          Falange = left anti-capitalist movement, read the works of Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera (can be found in Russian translation). Similar to Bakunin and Makhno.

          This is the early Falange. Which eventually drifted even further to the right of Franco, becoming in 1937 the Spanish Traditionalist Falange of the Unions of National-Syndicalist Offensive.
    2. +8
      4 July 2025 12: 31
      In the Spanish Civil War, there was already a war within a war between the Republicans, the Stalinists had eliminated the Trotskyists, the anarchists were not liked by anyone, and as the war progressed, they were gradually eliminated and removed from key positions. The Basques also had a special position: on the one hand, they were Catholics and therefore closer to Franco's ideas, but on the other hand, they demanded independence, and only the Republicans offered it to them. The battles between the Navarrese and the Basques, two neighboring peoples, were among the most brutal in the entire civil war.
      1. 0
        6 July 2025 19: 46
        Questionable interpretation of events.
        1. 0
          7 July 2025 11: 50
          From what I had read in books about the Spanish Civil War, he revealed the following facts. The Stalinists hated the Trotskyists and tried to eliminate them. The anarchists wanted to abolish private property, the Stalinists did not. There were violent clashes between the Navarrese and the Basques.
    3. +1
      4 July 2025 18: 46
      There is an interesting film about these Spaniards (for the amateur)... "Madrid Circus"...
    4. Des
      +1
      4 July 2025 19: 30
      Thank you. A rare sensible comment here (they are being hammered in masses). I also (on the side of the Republicans, the USSR)) thought about the probable development of events in the event of a victory of the Republican coalition.
    5. 0
      4 July 2025 22: 50
      Quote: Timofey Charuta
      The anarchist brotherhood alone, with its own army, is worth something...

      The anarchist movement has survived Francoism, Stalinism and the CPSU. In Spain, there is an interesting anarchist enterprise, Fagor, which produces modern CNC and servo drives. It functions as an anarchist artel or cooperative.
    6. 0
      5 July 2025 09: 14
      Quote: Timofey Charuta


      The main question for me, apparently, does not have a clear answer - what if the Republic with its extremely motley political leadership (from anarchists to liberals, from Stalinist communists to obvious Trotskyists) had won that civil war? What next? Most likely a new civil war, showdowns and a struggle for power between the victorious, but temporary situational allies, the anarchist fraternity alone with its own army is worth something...


      If the Republic had won, its leadership would have very quickly become more homogeneous and monolithic. The superfluous elements would have been cut off.
      The paradox is that Franco, having won, borrowed a lot from the Republican program in economic terms. So the Republic, in time, would not have been so different from Franco's Spain. The leftists there just had to get along with the Catholic Church. As the Cuban communists did later.
      However, the establishment of a regime in Spain that was clearly not in solidarity with the Third Reich could have radically changed the course of World War II. For our allies, the USA and England, Spain could have been a convenient additional springboard for the deployment of the Second Front.
      1. +1
        6 July 2025 19: 57
        I live in Tenerife - the entire coastline accessible to landings is covered with defensive anti-landing structures from the Second World War (El Medano, etc.). The Spaniards did not want to share the fate of Madeira.
  3. +5
    4 July 2025 12: 21
    "The construction dragged on for 18 years due to technical and financial difficulties, as well as the aftermath of the Civil and Second World Wars and the subsequent isolation of the country. At that time, Spain had to follow the idea of ​​self-sufficiency - the policy of autarky (this is in many ways akin to our "import substitution policy")." Dear author! The isolation of the country? And what about Spain's sale of pyrite to Great Britain, and iron ore and tungsten to Nazi Germany, with Great Britain's complete control over the supply of petroleum products to the country through a certificate system (invented back in World War I)? Petroleum products from the USA went on US oil tankers from September 1, after 1940 months of American and British inspectors inspected all oil depots in Spain and calculated all the reserves of petroleum products that were owned by the company Compañía Arrendataria del Monopolio del Petróleo, SA (Campsa)... Historians of the automotive industry write about "SEAT": "In the second half of the 2s, the Spanish government decided to resume cooperation with Fiat. At the same time, there were no plans to restore the old production, but they decided to build a new plant in Zona Franca, in the suburbs of Barcelona. In 1940, a contract was signed with Fiat. The controlling stake in the new enterprise (1948%) belonged to the National Institute of Industry (INI), 51% of the shares were divided between six Spanish banks, Fiat received 42% in exchange for technical assistance. The company Sociedad Española de Automóviles de Turismo SA, or SEAT for short, was officially registered on May 7, 9. Jose Ortis Echague became the company's president.... In 1950, a modification with a 1969-liter Mercedes-Benz diesel engine with a capacity of 1,8 hp appeared. It was advertised as a car capable of driving 46 million km without major repairs, and this was true. In 1, some cars began to be equipped with 1971-liter 2-horsepower diesel engines. At the end of 55, the SEAT 1972 was discontinued." And how is it that, given the "isolation" of Spain since 1500, The British Motor Corporation Limited, together with Nueva Montaña Quijano SA, organized the production of British cars in Spain, including the famous "Mini"?
    Yes, on 13.12.1941 the Spanish tanker Badalona was sunk by a prize party from the German submarine U-453. Is this a real victory or a false victory, since Spain is almost an ally of Germany, having signed the "Anti-Comintern Pact" back in the spring of 1939?
  4. +8
    4 July 2025 13: 39
    The figure of the caudillo, despite ideological differences, is in many ways reminiscent of Stalin. He swapped espadrilles for cars, turning a rural country into the tenth industrial power. Whatever one may say, he was a giant.
  5. 0
    5 July 2025 09: 01
    Quote: your1970
    People who are ready to fight in a FOREIGN country are dangerous for any government. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why our "Spaniards" were also thinned out quite a bit when they returned to the USSR.


    People who are ready to fight in a foreign country for the interests and security of their own are the cream of the nation, the gold of the gene pool.
    The fact that our "Spaniards" were thinned out is worse than a mistake. Hitler and his henchmen benefited from this, including due to the loss of such valuable personnel by the USSR, the beginning of the Great Patriotic War was so difficult for our country.
    Those "Spaniards" who survived made their contribution to the final Victory. This especially concerns the personnel of our special services.
  6. 0
    5 July 2025 09: 05
    Quote: Alexey RA
    Although, it would seem, what could be better for a dictator than a small victorious war and the return of long-since seized ancestral territories?


    It would not have been victorious for long. The English would have taken harsh revenge for the capture of their base over time. And so... it was Churchill, appreciating Franco's common sense, who got the latter off Stalin's back in Potsdam.
  7. +2
    5 July 2025 09: 14
    A magnificent structure! People will be born, live as long as they can, and then into the ground. And this will remain. It is very important, after all, what will remain after you.
    1. +1
      6 July 2025 20: 11
      This is a memory of the fallen on both sides. In Santa Cruz de Tenerife there is a monument "to all those who died for Spain". Each side defended its ideals. I consider myself a communist, but I also understand that the policy of the Popular Front led to the death of the country's economy and complete anarchy.
      1. -1
        7 July 2025 04: 13
        Well, anarchists were in charge there. That's why the Republic actually collapsed. I mean, there are many reasons, but this is the decisive one.
  8. 0
    7 July 2025 13: 26
    Quote: Alexander Mitrofanov
    I live in Tenerife - the entire coastline accessible to landings is covered with defensive anti-landing structures from the Second World War (El Medano, etc.). The Spaniards did not want to share the fate of Madeira.


    The discussion was about earlier events. And if the Spanish Republicans had won, what would have prevented them from becoming members of the anti-Hitler coalition?