Development of Chinese MBT Type 99А2 close to completion

9 685 13
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. PDM80 Rank
    PDM80
    +3
    April 12 2013 12: 28
    Yes, the Chinese are amazing people, they interfere with everything and try to get something worth it, a wild mix of Russian and American tanks request and the technical data of the tank can be safely halved
    1. Kurbashi
      Kurbashi
      0
      April 12 2013 12: 31
      Quote: PDM80
      and the technical data of the tank can be safely halved

      Do not make such rash conclusions ... China is far from the one you knew a decade ago.
    2. Wedmak Rank
      Wedmak
      0
      April 12 2013 12: 31
      wild cross between Russian and American tanks

      Given that the chassis of the 72nd is unlikely to withstand the tower from the ambram ... another trimmed cross.
      1. Alex_dex
        Alex_dex
        0
        April 12 2013 12: 35
        You are not right. T-90MS at least remember. There, the tower be healthy, or the best in the world Oplot-M with Bulat, they all keep.
        1. Wedmak Rank
          Wedmak
          0
          April 12 2013 12: 40
          I neither know, nor I know ... The T-90s, if memory serves, have multilayer armor plus reactive armor. The Abrams also has a "gasket" made of depleted uranium there, and the tower itself is larger, and even the APU is stuck.
          1. Alex_dex
            Alex_dex
            0
            April 12 2013 12: 41
            Do you think it’s harder, laying, or a DZ complex? In teshek, it’s rather thick armor, to put it mildly.
            1. Wedmak Rank
              Wedmak
              0
              April 12 2013 12: 51
              Do you think it’s harder, laying, or a DZ complex?

              The uranium plate is in every way heavier than a steel plate and explosive plates (and between them is air). And how many of them there FIG knows.
  2. WIN969 Rank
    WIN969
    -4
    April 12 2013 12: 40
    Another Chinese fake negative
    1. vilenich
      vilenich
      0
      April 12 2013 15: 52
      Quote: WIN969
      Another Chinese fake

      Actually, it’s probably time to take Chinese developments more seriously. They have already passed the phase of frank plagiarism and moved on to developments based on stolen structures and technologies. So it is likely that in the near future they will create a lot of worth!
  3. Diesel
    Diesel
    -1
    April 12 2013 14: 14
    Well, if it’s close, I’ll go wassat The 5th generation airplane I remember is also close
  4. kirieeleyson Rank
    kirieeleyson
    +1
    April 12 2013 17: 33
    Quote: Kurbashi
    China is far from what you knew a decade ago.

    A hackneyed expression. Yes, that he, that. The same China, the same people work as 10 years ago. Like from Hong Kong, they brought me a branded Chinese thing. which was supposed to work like a clock, because "China is not the same, consumer goods remained in the 90s, but they do everything for themselves no worse than special orders!" So what, threw it out after 2 months, broke. Let them do a high-quality MTO for Type 99 first, otherwise they will have 30% occupancy in the troops, the rest are in hangars at the final stage, before talking about the FCS and the gun.
  5. Warbringer
    Warbringer
    0
    April 12 2013 17: 52
    Even the Chinese guessed to cut out this wretched weakened zone on WLD and judging by the tower - they also sent a tank rack in a known direction, and a campaign together with a wretched carousel-AZ. They are doing everything right.
  6. darksoul Rank
    darksoul
    0
    April 12 2013 22: 56
    centaur ... tower american base russian: D. Well, the Chinese, well, the miracle of the master. Thank you, at least our T-90MS was not completely copied.
  7. svp67 Rank
    svp67
    0
    April 13 2013 11: 37
    Quote: vilenich
    Actually, it’s probably time to take Chinese developments more seriously. They have already passed the phase of frank plagiarism and moved on to developments based on stolen structures and technologies. So it is likely that in the near future they will create a lot of worth!



    Yes, any enemy must be taken seriously, the question is different. The Chinese haven’t come up with anything yet, they still manage, and it is not known with what quality, to cross an "elephant with a hippopotamus". It will be possible to talk about something specific only when this tank can be examined closely in the metal, and not by "rumors"
  8. Canep Rank
    Canep
    0
    April 13 2013 12: 54
    No matter how modern or obsolete it is, if there are a million of them (and the Chinese can do it), then no one can resist. And this one looks at the level of T-72.
    The difference between the Type 99A2 and the base sample is the presence of a larger number of dynamic protection panels, which are installed on the front and on the sides of the tower.

    And according to the description of the T-80.
  9. cesar65 Rank
    cesar65
    0
    April 13 2013 17: 08
    A 140mm cannon can penetrate the frontal armor of the American M1A2 tank, not to mention other third-generation tanks. But China is still holding on to the 125mm cannon of the Type 99 tank, which limits the firepower of subsequent versions of the combat vehicle. It's just that ours haven't made a 140mm cannon yet.
  10. elmir15 Rank
    elmir15
    +2
    April 26 2013 00: 22
    What are the more dangerous Chinese tanks so is the ability to burn optical devices from the enemy, we also have but for some reason they don’t put on equipment