French ZAK RapidFire and its variants

15 285 39
French ZAK RapidFire and its variants
The first version of the RapidFire self-propelled anti-aircraft gun on a three-axle Unimog chassis. Photo by Armyrecognition.com


Several years ago, the French military industry presented a promising anti-aircraft artillery RapidFire complex. It was further developed and improved. Various options for mounting the combat module on various carriers were proposed. Some of them have already been brought to serial production.



Exhibition sample


The RapidFire anti-aircraft artillery system (AAAS) was developed by the French companies Nexter (later KNDS France) and Thales Group with the participation of the British CTA International. Work began at the beginning of the last decade, and after several years, they reached the testing of experimental equipment.

The first version of the project proposed the creation of a ZAK with a 40-mm gun on a wheeled automobile chassis. Such a combat vehicle was proposed as a means Defense close-range missile system, complementing other anti-aircraft systems. It was already noted then that the complex's targets would include unmanned aerial vehicles.

At the turn of the 1910s and 1920s, the RapidFire project underwent revision aimed at improving its main characteristics. In addition, a new version of the ZAK was created, designed for fleet. The official presentation of this product took place at the Euronaval 2022 exhibition. The pavilion presented the complex in the form of a combat module and related equipment designed for installation on surface platforms.


Control panel in the car cabin. Photo Armyrecognition.com

During the first shows, the developer companies revealed the general appearance of the new complex, and also named its features and main characteristics. It was also reported that the RapidFire project has great potential for development. First of all, it was planned to continue developing the ground version of the complex.

It was also reported that the new ZAK had attracted the interest of its first buyers. Negotiations were held, and contracts were expected to be signed as a result. The French armed forces, both the navy and the army, were considered as the main customer. At the same time, they wanted to receive export orders, which could be facilitated by a contract with their own Ministry of Defense.

Thales and KNDS France subsequently showed the RapidFire ZAK at other exhibitions on numerous occasions. They revealed details of the latest work and published other information. In addition, small and full-size mock-ups of interest were regularly shown. They were used as an example to show how the system might look in different versions.

For example, new land-based versions of the ZAK were shown at exhibitions in recent months. One of them was made as a stationary platform with all the necessary equipment. The second had a similar appearance, but was mounted on a serial automobile chassis.


ZAK based on the TITUS armored vehicle. Telegram graphics / Vestnik PVO

Buyers' interest


Back in the mid-1910s, the experienced RapidFire ZAK demonstrated its combat capabilities in combating various targets, including the most complex ones. It received high marks, but this did not help in quickly receiving orders.

The first contract for the delivery of the systems was obtained only a few years ago. The initial customer, as expected, was the French military department. The first contract provides for the production of 14 naval systems. According to known data, KNDS France and Thales have fulfilled about half of the order to date.

Some of the new ZAKs are intended for the French Navy's Jacques Chevallier-class tankers under construction. The Jacques Chevallier and Jacques Stosskopf have already received two of these products. The lead tanker was accepted into service last year, and the second will begin service this year. There are also plans to build two more, on which the next four RapidFires will be installed.

The remaining seven systems are intended for ships of other types. At the same time, the full list of future ZAK carriers has not yet been disclosed. It is also not specified whether the Navy will limit itself to only 14 systems or will place additional orders in the future.

It has recently become known that the Ministry of Defense plans to order another 34 systems, now for the ground forces. In the near future, the corresponding modifications of RapidFire will undergo military testing, based on the results of which a decision on adoption is expected. It is still unclear which version of the ZAK the army will choose.


Ship complex. Photo European Defence Review

In parallel, issues of supplying new 40-mm rounds for artillery systems are being resolved. On June 16, 2025, the military department and KNDS France signed a contract for the supply of an unspecified quantity of ammunition for a total of 150 million euros. The first batch of 26 thousand rounds will be shipped next year. Since we are talking about a new system, 18 thousand shells will be training, and only 8 thousand will be combat. The contract will be implemented over five years and will fill the arsenals of the ground forces and navy.

Representatives of third countries who visited the exhibitions showed interest in the RapidFire ZAK. However, no export orders have been received yet. There is also no information about negotiations with potential buyers.

Unified module


The RapidFire system includes a remotely controlled combat module-turret with an automatic cannon and a set of auxiliary systems. Depending on the system design, they can be placed on a single platform or chassis, or on the deck and in the below-deck spaces of the ship.

The turret module is built in an armored hull that protects against bullets and shrapnel. In the center of the module is a swinging artillery unit, and on the sides are compartments for ammunition and other equipment. The design provides all-round horizontal guidance (in the absence of interference) and significant elevation angles.


RapidFire in the platform variant. Photo by KNDS France / Thales Group

The system is armed with a 40CT gun from CTA International. This is a 40 mm automatic gun with a 70 caliber barrel and a rate of fire of up to 200 rounds per minute. The gun uses an original family of 40x225 mm telescopic rounds. It includes armor-piercing, high-explosive fragmentation with air bursting and practice rounds.

When firing at air targets, the effective fire range reaches 4 km. Shooting at ground targets, depending on various factors, is carried out from a distance of up to 2,5-3 km. The ammunition load includes 70 rounds, but the turret design allows it to be doubled.

It was previously reported that the artillery system could be supplemented rocketsIn particular, they showed images and models of RapidFire with a launcher for the Starstreak MANPADS.

A mobile optical-electronic station is mounted directly on the module, performing the functions of a sight. It is equipped with day, night and laser rangefinder channels. The video signal and other data are transmitted via cable to the operator's console.

The control panel is mounted in a separate room or in the cabin. It has monitors for displaying information and controls. A full-fledged fire control system based on a multifunctional computer is used. "RapidFire" can operate independently or with third-party target designation.


New version of the self-propelled complex. Photo by KNDS France / Thales Group

On different platforms


Over the years, Nexter/KNDS France and Thales Group have shown several variants of artillery systems based on the RapidFire module. They were based on different platforms, and this led to significant differences in design, layout, etc.

The first to be presented in 2014 was a combat vehicle on a three-axle Unimog chassis. The vehicle had a platform body with jacks and a combat module. The power supply system and other units were located inside the platform. The operator console was placed in the standard vehicle cabin.

Later, images of an anti-aircraft self-propelled gun based on the TITUS armored car were demonstrated. To install the module, the rear of the vehicle was converted into a horizontal platform. The operator's workplace was again placed in the cabin.

The ship version of the module is placed on the deck on a rectangular base that accommodates some of the necessary devices. The ZAK is connected to the ship's power system and does not require its own power source. The operator's console is mounted on the bridge.

The stationary modification of RapidFire is made on a platform and has the dimensions of a 20-foot container. The platform carries a base with a tower, as well as a set of smaller hulls with a generator and other devices. The control panel is made separately. The platform with an anti-aircraft gun can be transported by suitable trucks and installed in position in a minimum time.


Model of a self-propelled ZAK at one of the recent exhibitions. Photo Armyrecognition.com

This year, a self-propelled version of such a ZAK was also shown. In this case, the platform with weapons is mounted on a vehicle, and the operator's console is placed in its cabin. Combat work is carried out directly "from the wheels". At the same time, the possibility of lowering the platform to the ground for work in a stationary version is probably not excluded.

From project to series


The first version of the promising RapidFire ZAK was presented in the middle of the last decade. It was subsequently repeatedly improved, and new options for use were also proposed. In general, work on the complex was significantly delayed, and the first order for serial production appeared only recently. Several products have already been delivered to the customer, and new ones are expected to be transferred in the near future.

It is easy to see that the work on the complex was seriously delayed. The overall complexity, difficulties of subcontractors in creating the gun, etc. affected the timing of its implementation. In addition, potential customers did not understand the concept of a ZAK with a 40-mm gun. However, by now all issues have been successfully resolved, as a result of which KNDS France and Thales are launching serial production.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    27 June 2025 07: 04
    We need the same one, only the size of a TV, to combat UAVs.
    1. 0
      27 June 2025 08: 41
      Modify the "Berezhok" module.
    2. +4
      27 June 2025 10: 45
      Yes, there is! BMP-3 "Derivation". 57mm S-60 gun. Only a programmable projectile is needed. But either the lobby is strong, or the stupidity of the Degenerals of the Russian Ministry of Defense, but everything is not in the troops yet.
      1. +3
        27 June 2025 19: 04
        As I understand it, we need to forget about derivation, as well as about all the Kurgan people, Armat people, bird catchers, bullies and everything else that we were told under Shoigu request
      2. P
        0
        28 June 2025 22: 38
        You can forget about the new ammunition, it won't happen. A large series, an automatic line - all these are investments that will have to be recouped by sales. No one will guarantee sales now, which means the whole idea will never go beyond the presentation.
      3. P
        +1
        28 June 2025 22: 38
        You can forget about the new ammunition, it won't happen. A large series, an automatic line - all these are investments that will have to be recouped by sales. No one will guarantee sales now, which means the whole idea will never go beyond the presentation.
  2. +6
    27 June 2025 08: 40
    How we lack something like this both on the front line and in the rear along the perimeter of important objects!!! "Derivation" in 3,5 years of war has not reached the frontline testing..................
    1. -3
      27 June 2025 09: 49
      Quote: Roman Efremov
      How we lack something like this both on the front line and in the rear along the perimeter of important objects!!

      What can it cover in our conditions. It is doubtful at the front. Will it be able to cover at least itself from FPV drones. And will it be able to shoot down Grad or Hymars shells?
      And it is not needed in the rear. With a range of 4 km, it will simply be flown around. And Pantsirs, unlike this miracle, have a radar, are integrated into the general air defense system and a range of up to 40 km.
      1. +3
        27 June 2025 11: 21
        Such a weapon shouldn't shoot down rockets - that's not its purpose. But it's perfect against drones. To compare it with Pantsir is, to put it mildly, strange. And Pantsir doesn't work against FPV, but this one can. And it's perfect against Lancets and Geraniums.
        1. -1
          30 June 2025 01: 00
          Quote: Roman Efremov
          And Pantsir doesn't work against FPV either.

          What prevents Pantsir from working according to FPV?
        2. 0
          30 September 2025 12: 57
          How will he shoot down an FPV that will be flying 10 cm from the ground?
      2. 0
        31 July 2025 16: 10
        Alexander, all your questions, as well as your holy faith in the "miraculous" radar of the "Pantsir" are caused by the fact that you have never been seriously interested in the topic of air defense and combating drones. Look closely at the photo in the article, you see a small box on the tower - this is an optoelectronic automatic control station that easily detects day and night, approximately as your eyes do with powerful binoculars, even a small quadcopter at a distance of 4 km. which no radar can classify as a danger, due to the small reflective area of ​​the object. As for the effectiveness of use, the main purpose of such air defense systems is to cover stationary objects or ships, where they are used by a group, while each individual barrel has its own firing sector. And for your information - each such battery has a radar mounted on a separate mobile chassis to increase the detection range of larger targets.
  3. -2
    27 June 2025 08: 47
    In fact, you can throw out the old guns on the Pantsir. Equip them with a similar product, provided that there will be a shell for them. And the Pantsir will be much more powerful than it is now. In principle, this is the best thing for a new upgrade, but whether the developer has such plans is a question. Otherwise, it turns out that the guns at the moment on the Pantsir are not a particularly effective weapon.
    1. 0
      27 June 2025 09: 02
      They went down a different path - small-sized "nails" for shooting at drones.

      Apparently, it is easier to make a rocket smaller than to learn how to make 30-mm shells with remote detonation.

      And this Rapidfire will work well on targets like Geranium, but what about smaller ones, like Baba Yaga?
      1. -1
        27 June 2025 10: 18
        Great, but there is one "BUT": will ZU itself survive where Baba Yaga flies.
        1. +4
          27 June 2025 18: 37
          It is easier and cheaper to hit Baba Yaga with a projectile with a programmable detonation than with a missile.
          1. 0
            30 June 2025 01: 02
            Quote: Roman Efremov
            It's easier to hit Baba Yaga with a projectile with a programmable detonation than with a missile,

            Why?
    2. 0
      27 June 2025 18: 36
      It is better to distribute different weapons on different chassis: with missiles and with guns. If the 57 mm gun is brought to mind, it will be difficult for one chassis to carry both the gun and missiles. Work in pairs, 4 pairs in a battery, 2 batteries in a division.
  4. +1
    27 June 2025 08: 56
    It is strange that in the Russian Federation we do not see various variants of the ZU on utility trucks. The Pantsir is the Sun is clear in our country. If it were not for the Arab customers, our Ministry of Defense would have molded it, like the Tunguska, on tracks. or, like the OSA AKM, on a special chassis.....The industry would not have time to produce it and we would have failed to protect the country from air threats. Although it is quite possible to put it on the chassis of the URAL and KamAZ with an armored cabin. And make the system cheaper and use it in the rear areas.
    1. +1
      27 June 2025 09: 27
      It is strange that in the Russian Federation you cannot see different types of chargers on commercial trucks.

      "added value" for the Ministry of Defense is not enough: this is not their path...
      1. -1
        27 June 2025 10: 19
        So you can order an armored truck with a maximum engine....
        1. 0
          27 June 2025 10: 21
          So you can order an armored truck with a maximum engine....

          if possible, I will correct: "with the maximum cost"
          1. -1
            27 June 2025 10: 26
            Here, as a matter of fact, the question is different: how many tracked chassis can we make in pieces and how difficult is it to fit the same Pantsir into this chassis?! And how necessary is it for movements in the rear?

            The same question applies to the Coalition type self-propelled gun system.
            1. 0
              27 June 2025 19: 44
              A hundred years ago, the armored vehicle was shown on a tracked chassis.
              https://topwar.ru/17841-zenitnyy-pushechno-raketnyy-kompleks-blizhnego-deystviya-pancir-s1-96k6.html
              And recently they started offering it without a chassis at all
    2. +2
      27 June 2025 10: 50
      Quote: Zaurbek
      Pantsir here The sun is clear in our country. If it were not for the Arab customers, our Ministry of Defense would have molded it, like Tunguska, on tracks. or, like OSA AKM, on a special chassis...

      I doubt it. It was originally made not for the army air defense, but for the country's air defense. And there are a lot of vehicles and tractors on the chassis of various trucks, and the requirements for cross-country ability are not as strict as for the army.
      1. -1
        27 June 2025 10: 52
        And if it had been made for the Army, would we have Pantsir now?
        1. +3
          27 June 2025 11: 30
          Quote: Zaurbek
          And if it had been made for the Army, would we have Pantsir now?

          But they wouldn’t have made it for the army - the army had the Tunguska, and it suited them at the time.
          But with the write-off of the S-125, the country's air defense has developed a big fifth point in the form of a complete lack of short-range and low-altitude air defense systems. There is the "Three Hundred" - and that's it, nothing more. Plus, the experience of the war in the BV and in Iraq has shown that the positions of the BD air defense systems need direct cover.
      2. 0
        27 June 2025 11: 29
        I agree. A tracked chassis is absolutely not needed for object air defense, and the customer understands this perfectly well.
  5. +1
    27 June 2025 09: 40
    We need a similar derivation of 2-3 installations on oil bases 5-6 on airfields, and in a stationary version it is very interesting
    1. -3
      30 June 2025 01: 06
      Quote: aleksandrs95
      We need a similar derivation of 2-3 installations on oil bases 5-6 on airfields, and in a stationary version it is very interesting

      Why? There are variants of the Pantsir that are much more effective. The effectiveness of the ZAK decreases significantly with increasing target parameter.
  6. +4
    27 June 2025 10: 21
    Back in 1960, the 4x23mm Yenisei participated in the competition for a military ZSU alongside the 2x37mm Shilka.
    http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-401.html
    1. +1
      27 June 2025 10: 31
      37 mm, by the way, is a very good weapon, and can be mounted on an infantry fighting vehicle.
    2. +1
      28 June 2025 18: 02
      Very true information. In those years, the 14,5 mm KPVT machine gun on the BTR-60/70/80 was clearly insufficient, a 23 mm cannon was needed. And on the BMP-2 they started installing a 30 mm cannon, where a 37 mm cannon would have fit better. Alas, progress went down a crooked path.
  7. -1
    27 June 2025 10: 53
    Second day of liking the author and the article.
    Assembled with high quality.
    good

    On the SUBJECT: the solution with telescopic shells is not obvious, for example, the US closed its program.

    The same AHEAD shells easily go in conventional calibers, from 25 mm to 57...
    There is no alternative to them in air defense, IMHO, even the Poles make their own AHEAD - because it is effective and cheap.
    1. -1
      30 June 2025 01: 09
      Quote: Wildcat
      There is no alternative to them in air defense, IMHO, even the Poles make their own AHEAD - because it is effective and cheap.

      So the Poles wrote that AHEAD reduces the ammunition consumption for hitting a typical target by 3.7 times. But they did not indicate how many times more expensive AHEAD is than a regular fragmentation anti-aircraft shell. If there are no suitable SAMs, you have to mess around with guns and AHEADs.
  8. 0
    27 June 2025 21: 12
    Remember what our marines made?
  9. -1
    27 June 2025 23: 50
    Quote: PROXOR
    Yes, there is! BMP-3 "Derivation". 57mm S-60 gun. Only a programmable projectile is needed. But either the lobby is strong, or the stupidity of the Degenerals of the Russian Ministry of Defense, but everything is not in the troops yet.

    We need to have a snack, there is no sign of any S-60 on the derivation.
  10. -3
    27 June 2025 23: 52
    Quote: Zaurbek
    If it weren’t for the Arab customers, our Ministry of Defense would have stuck it on tracks like Tunguska.

    The Pantsir was initially promoted as a wheeled version of the Tunguska, but only later did it turn into the monster it is today.
    1. 0
      30 June 2025 01: 21
      Quote: Dozorny - severa
      The Pantsir was originally promoted as a wheeled version of the Tunguska,

      Where did you get this nonsense?
      Quote: Dozorny - severa
      and only then did he turn into the freak he is today

      That's a strong statement. What does "he turned into the freak he is today" mean?