Generalissimo Stalin

59 506 111
Generalissimo Stalin


Generalissimuses of Russia


For all history In the existence of this highest title in Russia, only five people have been awarded it.



The title of Generalissimo (from the Latin generalissimus - "the most important") was first awarded in 1569 in France to the Duke of Anjou (later King Henry III). In France, the term "Generalissimo" meant an honorary military title that was given to members of ruling dynasties and the most prominent statesmen. In the Holy Roman Empire, the Austrian Empire and England, it was the position of commander of the active army during a war or commander-in-chief of all the troops of the state. In Russia and Spain, it was an honorary highest military rank.

In Russia, the word "generalissimo" appeared during the reign of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich. Foreign officers serving in the Russian army addressed the Grand Voivode, who was considered the commander of the army, in this way. Tsar Peter Alexeevich first granted the title of Generalissimo to Voivode Alexei Semenovich Shein in 1696.

Alexey Shein came from an old boyar family and was noted by Peter for his successes in the Azov campaigns of 1695-1696, which ended with the capture of the Turkish fortress of Azov. During the first, unsuccessful Azov campaign, Alexey Shein commanded the guards - the Preobrazhensky and Semenovsky regiments. During the second Azov campaign, in 1696, the Russian voivode was the commander of the land forces.

After the capture of Azov, the Tsar appointed Shein as commander-in-chief of the Russian army, commander artillery, cavalry and head of the Foreign Office. Shein was responsible for the southern strategic direction, fought the Turks and Crimean Tatars. However, Shein soon fell into disfavor (due to the Streltsy affair) and died in 1700.

Officially, the military rank of Generalissimo in the Russian state was introduced by the Military Regulations of 1716. Therefore, formally, the first Generalissimo of Russia was the “fledgling of Peter’s nest,” the Tsar’s favorite Alexander Danilovich Menshikov.

He was a contradictory personality. On the one hand, he was a long-time loyal companion of Peter, successfully led the troops, played a major role in the decisive Battle of Poltava, where he commanded first the vanguard and then the left flank of the Russian army. At Perevolochna, he forced the remaining Swedish troops to capitulate.

On the other hand, he was power-hungry and greedy for money and wealth. In terms of the number of serfs, he became the second soul owner in Russia after Tsar Peter. Menshikov was repeatedly caught embezzling money. Peter let him off easy for a long time, recognizing his services to the Fatherland and under the influence of his wife Catherine (it was Menshikov who presented the future empress to the Tsar). However, at the end of Peter's reign, Menshikov fell into disgrace and was deprived of his main positions.

Under Peter, Menshikov did not receive the rank of Generalissimo. After Peter's death, he carried out the first palace coup, placing Catherine on the throne. He became the de facto ruler of Russia under Catherine I and Peter II. When Peter II Alekseevich became the third Emperor of All Russia on May 6 (17), 1727, Menshikov received the rank of full admiral. And on May 12, he was granted the rank of Generalissimo.

As a result, Menshikov received the title of Generalissimo not in recognition of his military merits, but as a favor from the Tsar. Menshikov suffered defeat in the struggle with other dignitaries and nobles. In September 1727, Menshikov was arrested and exiled. He was deprived of all awards and positions.

The next generalissimo, Prince Anton Ulrich of Brunswick, also had no special merits for Russia that would be worth noting with such a mark of attention. Anton Ulrich was the husband of Anna Leopoldovna. When Anna Leopoldovna became regent (ruler) of the Russian Empire under the young Emperor Ivan VI, her husband received the highest military rank on November 11, 1740. This happened after the palace coup that put an end to Biron's rule.

Anton Ulrik did not possess, in contrast to the same Menshikov, any managerial and military talents, he was a gentle and limited man. Therefore, he was unable to protect his family. On the night from 5 to 6 in December 1741 of the year in Russia there was another palace coup: Brunswick's name was overthrown, Elizabeth Petrovna ascended the throne. Anton Ulrik was deprived of all ranks and titles and with the whole family sent to exile.

On October 28, 1799, the great Russian commander Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov became the Generalissimo of the Russian land and sea forces. He was awarded by Emperor Paul in honor of the legendary Swiss campaign of 1799, when Suvorov's Russian miracle heroes defeated not only the French, but also nature. Alexander Suvorov received this title by right. He did not lose a single battle, he crushed the Poles, Ottomans and French. Suvorov was the author of "The Science of Victory", a short instruction for soldiers, which expressed the Russian spirit, which allows one to emerge victorious in the most difficult conditions. The commanders of the Suvorov school were M. I. Kutuzov, P. I. Bagration and others.

Joseph Vissarionovich


After the generalissimos of the 18th century, no one in Russia was awarded the highest military rank, although the Russian army still fought a lot. The victor of Napoleon's Grand Army, Mikhail Kutuzov, was awarded the rank of Field Marshal for his distinction at Borodino.

Even such a great war as the First World War did not lead to the emergence of Russian generalissimos. After the October Revolution of 1917, the previous military ranks were abolished, and with them the rank of generalissimo.

Only during the most terrible and bloody war of the 20th century - the Great Patriotic War, which became sacred for Russia-USSR, since the question of the survival of Russian civilization and the Russian superethnos was at stake, did they return to the idea of ​​reviving this title. During this period, many Russian military traditions were returned to Soviet Russia.

According to the recollections of contemporaries, the issue of assigning the military rank of Generalissimo was discussed several times, but Supreme Commander-in-Chief Stalin invariably rejected this proposal.

Only on June 26, 1945, by decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the highest military rank of “Generalissimo of the Soviet Union” was introduced, and on June 27 it was awarded to Joseph Stalin.

There is a very interesting legend connected with Stalin being awarded the title of Generalissimo. As is well known, the Soviet leader was indifferent to titles and symbols of power, lived modestly, even ascetically. The Supreme Commander did not like sycophants, believing that servile scoundrels were worse than obvious enemies.

According to the recollections of contemporaries, the question of awarding the title of Generalissimo to Stalin was discussed several times, but the "leader of the peoples" constantly rejected this proposal. At the same time, the highest military leaders especially insisted on the revival of this title, for them the hierarchy was of great importance. One of these discussions took place in Stalin's presence.

Marshal of the Soviet Union Konev recalled that Stalin responded as follows: “Do you want to award Comrade Stalin the rank of Generalissimo? Why does Comrade Stalin need that? Comrade Stalin doesn’t need that. Comrade Stalin already has authority. You need titles for authority. So what, they found a title for Comrade Stalin – Generalissimo. Chiang Kai-shek is Generalissimo, Franco is Generalissimo. Nothing to say, good company for Comrade Stalin. You are Marshals, and I am a Marshal, do you want to remove me from the ranks of Marshals? To become some kind of Generalissimo?” That is, Stalin gave a categorical refusal.

The marshals continued to insist and decided to exert influence through Konstantin Konstantinovich Rokossovsky, one of Stalin's favorite commanders. Rokossovsky managed to convince Marshal Stalin with a simple but true argument showing the military hierarchy. He said: "Comrade Stalin, you are a marshal and I am a marshal, you cannot punish me!"

As a result, Stalin gave in. Although later, according to Molotov, he repented of this decision: "Stalin regretted that he agreed to the generalissimo. He always regretted. And rightly so. It was Kaganovich, Beria who overdid it... And the commanders insisted."

Although, to be honest, he was wrong to reproach himself. Stalin deserved this high title. His enormous, simply titanic work, which transformed an agrarian country into a global economic and military superpower, which offered the planet an alternative path of development, still affects Russia's position as a great power.

Joseph Stalin was the only generalissimo in the history of Russia who not only held the highest military rank in the country, but was also its leader. Under his leadership, Russia-USSR was prepared for war: the army, the economy and society. The Union became the most powerful industrial power, which was not only able to withstand the war with almost all of Europe led by Hitler's Germany, but also to achieve a brilliant victory. The Soviet armed forces became the most powerful force on the planet.

The Soviet Union became a superpower, which in the field of science and advanced technologies, education and culture was a world leader, leading humanity into the future. The Red Empire was then a kind of "beacon" for the entire planet, instilling hope in humanity for a bright future. In Russia, a society of knowledge, service and creation was built, based on the ethics of conscience and social justice.

Stalin revived Great Russia in the form of the Soviet Empire, won the Second World War, created the nuclear shield and sword of our Motherland.

Therefore, it is senseless and mean to deny the merits of this great man to our civilization. This great man united our civilization and people into a single and powerful force in the most difficult times, and led not only the army, but the entire country. People sincerely loved him, believed in a bright future and built it. And they saw the fruits of their labors.

After Stalin, the title of Generalissimo of the Soviet Union was not conferred, but was listed in the charters until the year 1993. In 1993, together with other individual military ranks of the Armed Forces of the USSR, the rank of Generalissimo of the Soviet Union was not included in the list of military ranks of the Russian Armed Forces.
111 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 35
    26 June 2025 03: 01
    Stalin revived Great Russia in the form of the Soviet Empire, won the Second World War, created the nuclear shield and sword of our Motherland.
    And this is undeniable!
    1. + 32
      26 June 2025 08: 21
      That's absolutely right, so
      It is senseless and mean to deny the merits of this great man to our civilization
      “However, over the past three decades, the face of Russia has begun to change. The essence of Stalin's truly historic achievements is that he accepted Russia with a plow and left with nuclear reactors. He raised Russia to the level of the second industrially developed country in the world. This was not the result of purely material progress and organizational work. Such achievements would not have been possible without an all-encompassing cultural revolution, during which the entire population attended school and studied very hard. "
      1. + 24
        26 June 2025 08: 48
        Stalin is one of the main national heroes of the Russian people, an ineradicable symbol of progress, justice, order, strength and glory of Russia. The results and reasons for Stalin's success were very succinctly described by the English historian Isaac Deutscher:
        The essence of Stalin's historical achievements is that he took over Russia with a wooden plough and left it with nuclear reactors. He raised Russia to the level of the second industrially developed country in the world... Such achievements would not have been possible without a comprehensive cultural revolution, during which the entire population attended school and studied very intensively.

        Where have we "jumped" over the past 33 years? Stalin became the great organizer, inspirer and winner of the bloodiest war in the history of mankind – the Second World War, which became the Great Patriotic War for us. The Second World War was the first attempt by Western globalists to destroy the USSR – the emerging successful alternative to capitalism.

        Despite the defeats of the Red Army in the first period of the war, when the Germans reached Moscow in October 1941, Stalin did not lose heart, was able to concentrate the power of the state, unite the people, transfer industrial enterprises beyond the Urals, increase the production of weapons and crush the fascist vermin, for which the whole of Europe enslaved by the Germans worked. The whole country, despite the rationing system, including teenagers, worked for the Victory, dug trenches and produced tanks, guns and shells. And it was a Great Time!
      2. +2
        27 June 2025 00: 19
        Strictly speaking, the peculiarity of the development of progress in the 20th century gave rise to very sharp technological and industrial leaps, otherwise the world population would not have grown 20+ times in the 3th century.
        So, over a period of 30 years, quite a few countries rose quite sharply - the question of some superhuman qualities of their leaders, on which this directly depended - this is not such a clear-cut thing. For example, we take Israel - a people thoroughly beaten after WW2 from all over the world, from different countries and with different dialects arrived in the desert with sand and camel poop and after ten years shook all the surrounding Arabs and after 30 years had "that very nuclear weapon" (which it does not have, of course). They built a state practically from scratch. Without oil or gas gushing from under the ground, without sawdust and nickel, without the GULAG and so on and so forth. Well, and without Stalin, for good measure.
        For example, let's take Sweden - in the 1930s, it was a real place. A backwater, a sparse population, and a sad life. 40 years pass and we see that the Swedes have a pretty decent industry and a standard of living that's great for a northern country. Of course, they didn't have a nuclear bomb or even the first reactor in Europe, and they weren't the first to send a Swede into space, but they made excellent equipment for those reactors or machine tools for those rockets (and they still do, actually). Same 30-40 years, no ketchup or drama. And no Stalin.
        Let's move on. Post-war Japan. The guys weren't exactly living it up, but after the war they were up to their ears in their rectums. wassat The trade fleet is sunk, cities and industry are torn apart, forests are cut down, there are no resources, the population is living on kefir and enemas. 30 years pass and we see that not only the IVS can, so to speak. And in another 13, the Japanese economy overtakes the USSR economy. Such are the pies. You can grumble as much as you like about being fed with investments - the fact is the fact, the Japs have exploded like hell. And not only without Stalin, but in principle without some fat icon-personality.
        Let's move on. Post-war FRG. 30 years pass and this same EU is already twisting and turning on a joint basis, selling us pipes for oil, the deal of the century, here and there... why, by the way, did we buy these pipes from them? Couldn't the industry of the mighty USSR cope with this, but the FRG could? Hmm... I will note that the Germans were thoroughly scooped out and a lot of their minds were knocked out (and Aloisych and the allies tried), reparations and all that... but here, 30 years later and "Germany" is like Vanka-vstanka. And again - without the cult of the leader, great and insightful.
        Or, for example, let's take South Africa. A frankly sad place, the climate is terrible, the end of the world, the whites breed cattle or farm, nothing special. Well, yes, they are quietly racist there, apartheid and all that. No one is friends with them for this.
        Which, however, does not prevent them from making their own good military industry and this very nuclear weapon. On their knee, from shit and sticks. And 30 years after WW2 they have it.
        The PRC can be considered the same, the USA if we take the dynamics from the beginning of the century and before the WD and after the WD until the 1960s, for example. Stupidly 2 30-year periods, the most striking growth of prosperity.
        We can consider the successes of some Egypt, there, of course, will be no nuclear weapons, but there will be a breakthrough in industry and the standard of living, not so bad. And what a breakthrough happened to some Saudis, ohhh...

        In short, all this is not given with the purpose of belittling the IVS and so on.. the point is that in the 20th century, in principle, there was an explosive dynamic based on progress. Development was slow where the authorities were dumb a la Yeltsin in the 90s or if some Pinochet or Pol Pot came. But where there was a person who knew at least the ABCs and without cannibalistic ideas and there was an investment climate, some kind of fight against corruption and more or less adequate bureaucracy - there involuntarily blossomed and smelled. A capable leader could catch this wave in full, but it is necessary to understand that the wave itself was the most powerful factor that allowed the modernization of states.
        Progress in chemistry, physics, electrical engineering, heat engines, precision machining, materials science, geology, biology, agriculture and blah-blah-blah. Various books began to be translated there, teachers began to teach a little more than psalters and rods.
        Drastic changes were inevitable.
    2. -6
      26 June 2025 10: 00
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      And this is undeniable!

      That's right!
      But there are also a number of other undeniable bad deeds that cannot be erased from history.
      Knowing that specific forum participants discussing articles about I.V. Stalin extremely dislike any criticism of him, I will nevertheless repeat that one should not create an idol for oneself, but rather use the historical heritage to its full extent, drawing from it the good and mercilessly rejecting the unacceptable.
      Many do not bother to study historical facts, they draw their opinions only from newspapers, it is more interesting that way. But now there is a mass of revealed primary sources, which are now easy to study: memoirs of participants in the events, and without propaganda edits, archival information from people's commissariats, scientific statistical research, etc.
      1. + 14
        26 June 2025 10: 18
        You, enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, have proven that you will falsify any fact, even the most indisputable one, as it suits you, and using the template of your slander against Stalin, you can slander the Romanovs and any government in the world in general, presenting even the existence of places of detention for criminals in the country as its crime.
      2. +3
        26 June 2025 19: 02
        Quote: Alekseev
        Many people don’t bother to study historical facts; they draw their opinions only from newspapers, it’s more interesting that way.

        That's why I usually don't write comments in such articles.. for those who write here - it doesn't matter if it's the whole truth or a constructive discussion, for them - you don't like Stalin and the USSR, but you say that you just like them? - minus for you.. even if you provide references and archives.. it's like communicating with a crowd of passionate believers in something... and I understand their behavior, to be brought up in faith in something, and then suddenly everything is different and even the country is different.. they even dug up data.. but they don't need it.. in general, it's easier not to communicate, let them praise themselves.. look - I didn't say that the IVS and the USSR are bad - but there will be plenty of minuses.. laughing
      3. 0
        5 July 2025 11: 04
        When would you know from what rubbish
        Sometimes the cursor arrow pops up!..

        By the way, here's a random rhyme:
        Everyone needs a forum to
        The sage honed his mind,
        Dumb - a feeling of anger...
    3. -2
      3 July 2025 01: 59
      Not Stalin, but under him.
      A synonym for the word generalissimo is general...
  2. +3
    26 June 2025 04: 57
    It seems that in the 70s someone from the Politburo proposed to award this title to the General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee. L. I. Brezhnev, but somehow the whole thing was hushed up. Evil tongues joked that the assignment of the high rank of Generalissimo did not take place only because Leonid Ilyich could not pronounce this word...
    1. + 24
      26 June 2025 06: 05
      Evil tongues joked that the assignment of the high rank of Generalissimo did not take place only because Leonid Ilyich could not pronounce this word...

      And really evil tongues. No one laughs at the gait of a disabled person wounded in the leg in the war. War veteran Brezhnev was wounded in the jaw. Laughing at his diction... well, it's not nice.
  3. + 25
    26 June 2025 05: 49
    Russians (Soviet) should pay tribute to this great man. We need to clear away all the trash from his grave that was thrown by liberals and traitors to the Motherland. Rename Volgograd to Stalingrad. Disperse the Yeltsin Center in Yekaterinburg and organize a museum of I.V. Stalin in its premises. He really was the best ruler of the USSR (Russia) over the past 250 years. Yes, he had mistakes and excesses, but he later admitted them, because he was an intelligent person. Although he was Georgian, he cared specifically about the Russian people. He brought together an empire, won the great war. The very attempt to build a socially oriented society (country) of a completely new way of life and government - this already justifies all his delusions and mistakes. He who does nothing makes no mistakes. And he did and did a lot, a lot.
    1. + 25
      26 June 2025 06: 04
      Russians (Soviet) should pay tribute to this great man.

      Unfortunately, but honors in our country today are given to a completely different person, in the form of the Alkash-center in Yekaterinburg and its recently opened branch in Moscow. Well, I will keep silent about the memorial plaque to Mannerheim in Leningrad and the Institute of Economics named after E. Gaidar wink
      1. + 11
        26 June 2025 06: 22
        Not everything is so monotonous.
        A nine-meter monument to Ivan the Terrible will be erected in Vologda
        1. + 10
          26 June 2025 07: 25
          Quote: Redoubt
          A nine-meter monument to Ivan the Terrible will be erected in Vologda
          Not the worst ruler of Rus'
          1. +8
            26 June 2025 10: 13
            Yes, it's actually good, if you think about it. Reading about the Time of Troubles, you always notice how rich Rus' was, a country that was robbed by anyone and everyone. It wasn't Godunov who did this in five years.
    2. + 12
      26 June 2025 10: 36
      Quote: Emelianenko Igor
      Yeltsin Center to be dispersed in Yekaterinburg

      The destroyer of the country gets such honors, but the founder of the state and the winner of the Great Patriotic War doesn’t even have a monument and access to the grave is blocked for laying flowers.
      1. +2
        26 June 2025 22: 31
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Quote: Emelianenko Igor
        Yeltsin Center to be dispersed in Yekaterinburg

        The destroyer of the country gets such honors, but the founder of the state and the winner of the Great Patriotic War doesn’t even have a monument and access to the grave is blocked for laying flowers.

        And remind me - which party? in chorus voted for "Stalin - ugh!!!" (c) at the 20th Congress?!!!!
        Which party voted unanimously to remove Stalin's body from the Mausoleum?
        Which party voted unanimously to rename Stalingrad?
        Which party gave the order across the country to demolish monuments to Stalin?
        Apparently United Russia?!! Or some "Beer Lovers' Party"?!!
        This same party (not some CDU/CSU or Tory - our own CPSU!) - which betrayed Stalin - then betrayed the people and the country...
        Having ABSOLUTE power - sold country. Inexpensive - Gorby advertised pizza for 100 bucks.
        And now the children and grandchildren of General Secretaries, Politburo members and Central Committee members live abroad...
  4. +9
    26 June 2025 06: 32
    Critics of historical figures should remember the famous phrase of the military historian Clausewitz about military leaders:
    "The men who acted in this case, even if they belonged to the number of the worst generals, were never deprived of simple common sense and would never have committed those absurd acts which the general public and historical criticism ascribe to them indiscriminately and indiscriminately. Most of the representatives of the latter would have been astonished if they had been able to acquaint themselves with the immediate motives of the actions and, in all probability, would themselves have submitted to them, like the general who now appears to them and is depicted by them as almost a half-idiot.”
  5. + 19
    26 June 2025 06: 55
    My respects to the author!
    I would like to add from myself the poem by A.N. Vertinsky "He":
    (Song about Stalin)

    A little gray, like a silver poplar,
    He stands, taking the parade.
    How much did Sevastopol cost him?
    How much did Stalingrad cost him?

    And on blind frosty nights
    When the front swept the blizzard,
    His clear, bright eyes
    We saw the enemy completely.

    These black, hard years
    All hope was on him.
    What super-hard rock
    Did nature create it?

    Winning in military science,
    Having stained snow with enemy blood
    He is in the people mighty hands
    He accepted the insolent enemy.

    And when the vandals approached
    To our ancient capital of fathers,
    Where did he find such generals
    And such legendary fighters?

    He raised them! - Over their upbringing
    He thought a lot nights and days.
    Oh what storm tests
    They were prepared!

    And in the battles for the Fatherland harsh
    Walked fearlessly to death for him,
    For his fair word,
    For his great truth.

    How high he lifted the power
    The leader of the Soviet peoples-friends,
    And what world fame
    He created it for his Fatherland!

    ... The same look! The same simple speeches!
    Words are just as stingy and wise!..
    Over the military map of Russia
    His head turned grey.

    1945
  6. + 18
    26 June 2025 07: 14
    Despite all the ambiguity of the Stalin Era, one thing is certain - without him the USSR would have lost the war. It is scary to even imagine what would have happened to us in that case.
    And would we even exist? wink
  7. + 19
    26 June 2025 07: 33
    I remember when WWII veterans met with my dad at the table, they said a lot about Stalin, both good and not so good, but they always called him respectfully - Joseph Vissarionovich.
  8. + 13
    26 June 2025 07: 55
    Stalin never wore the uniform of the Generalissimo, perhaps these uniforms were only in projects, oddly enough, he paid great attention to the military attributes of the historical continuity of the Red Army and the Imperial Army, he knew that Suvorov did not have the uniform of the Generalissimo.
    Stalin was distinguished by his modesty, he did not like to wear a marshal's uniform, he preferred a standard general's uniform with a turn-down collar and marshal's shoulder straps, he never wore the star of Hero of the Soviet Union, only the star of Hero of Socialist Labor.
    An interesting point: immediately after Stalin’s funeral, Beria ordered that all personal belongings of the deceased be removed from the dacha.
    1. +5
      26 June 2025 11: 20
      What uniform is he wearing in this photo?
      1. +1
        26 June 2025 12: 03
        Quote: Melior
        What uniform is he wearing in this photo?

        French Generalissimo.
        But he didn’t wear one, and it’s unlikely that there was one. Stalin didn’t like the uniform designs, so only the designs remained.
      2. +2
        26 June 2025 14: 37
        By the way, Chiang Kai-shek looks ridiculous, even funny, in the uniform of a generalissimo, somewhat similar to our demobilized soldiers, with epaulettes and a lot of other gadgets.
        Our hotheads also tried to build something similar for Stalin, but he had enough common sense in this matter.
        Franco also flaunts epaulettes, but his are more modest than Chiang Kai-shek's, not on the same scale.
    2. -13
      26 June 2025 12: 42
      Quote: bober1982
      Stalin was distinguished by his modesty

      Yes, Stalin's name given to mountain peaks, factories, newspapers, steamships, cities, taekwons, guns, cars, tens of thousands of monuments during his lifetime, a wave of praise everywhere and in everything, etc. - this confirms.

      under his leadership the victory in the war

      And under whose leadership were the most terrible defeats in military history in 41,42 and XNUMX?

      General of the Aryans A. Gorbatov, a clever man and an iron man, endured torture and kolyma:

      "When it was announced about a sudden attack by enemy aircraft on Zhitomir, Kyiv, Sevastopol, Kaunas, Minsk, on railway junctions and airfields and about enemy divisions crossing our border, this news shocked everyone. Why? There were many reasons for this.

      But I will probably not be mistaken if I say that our main problem was Stalin’s fatal delusion, We believed him then without complaint, but he turned out to be blind and disoriented everyone with the notorious TASS report of June 14, 1941."

      "If it weren't for the defeat of military personnel, we wouldn't have let the Germans get to the Volga, let alone the Dnieper
      1. +1
        26 June 2025 13: 02
        Quote: Olgovich
        General of the Aryans A. Gorbatov, a clever man and an iron man

        An interesting coincidence: before his arrest, General Gorbatov commanded the 7th Cavalry Corps (Starokonstantinov), later the 7th Bomber Aviation Regiment of the Soviet Air Force (Il-28, Su-24, Su-24m) was stationed in Stary, and now the 7th BrTA is based there (or was based there, they were killed there)
      2. + 14
        26 June 2025 13: 23
        Quote: Olgovich
        And under whose leadership were the most terrible defeats in military history in 41,42 and XNUMX?


        These were still defeats in battle, but not the final defeat in the war.
        The Poles and the French suffered more terrible defeats in that historical period. And the most shameful was that of the Czechoslovaks, who surrendered their country without firing a single shot.

        Well, yes, it’s even a pleasant activity to highlight other people’s mistakes, errors and failures.
        And who didn't have them?
        Those same Romanovs, who are, of course, closer to you than Stalin, didn’t have their own failures (I’m softening the wording)?
        Peter the Great was truly great. But on what terms was the so-called "Prut Peace" concluded with the Turks and why? To forgive an entire campaign - what is that?
        Alexander the First is supposedly the victor over Bonaparte... but what happened to the Russian army at Austerlitz, when the Tsar-father decided to take command himself?

        And with all due respect to General Gorbatov, his words are, alas, only his IMHO. I would hardly be mistaken that they were said/written after the 20th Congress. Because it is obvious to me that no matter how that war began, it would not have been possible to stop the Wehrmacht, given the real balance of forces, on the approaches to Smolensk in any case. Even if all our generals were as smart as Gorbatov and even as smart as Kutuzov and Nakhimov to boot.

        Well, the phrase about "disorientation due to the statement" is a laughing matter. A high-ranking commander is not a delicate young lady who can be "disoriented".
        It is characteristic that the command staff of the NKVD troops for some reason were not subject to “disorientation” and actually did everything they could.
        1. -9
          27 June 2025 10: 47
          Quote: Illanatol
          The Poles and the French suffered more terrible defeats during that historical period.

          No one had any lesions on the level of Kyiv, Vyazemsky, etc.
          Quote: Illanatol
          And who didn't have them?
          The same Romanovs

          Yes, the same Romanovs put the main burden of WWI on the Anglo-Franks, but WWII was the opposite.

          And the Romanovs built the largest country in the world - RUSSIA, and the Lenins and others tore it to pieces - see out the window.
          Quote: Illanatol
          . I would hardly be mistaken that they were said/written after the 20th Congress.

          and thank God - otherwise we would never have known the TRUTH - look at HOW he was tortured, like other commanders and ordinary people
          Quote: Illanatol
          Well, the phrase about “disorientation due to the statement” is a laughing matter.

          and for whom and why are these statements written? So that they...won't be believed?

          And yes, in Nazi Germany three thousand times fewer people were shot than in the USSR.
          38
          1. +7
            27 June 2025 13: 12
            Quote: Olgovich
            No one had any lesions on the level of Kyiv, Vyazemsky, etc.


            The final defeat in war is far worse than a lost battle.

            Quote: Olgovich
            Yes, the same Romanovs placed the main burden of WWI on the Anglo-Franks,


            The Romanovs didn't take on anything, don't lie. The Russian Empire in WWI was a group of six democracies and fought for the interests of others. Russia didn't need that war at all, there was nothing to share with the Kaiser.

            Quote: Olgovich
            And the Romanovs built the largest country in the world - RUSSIA, and the Lenins and others tore it apart


            You are repeating yourself, it has happened before. And you express yourself illiterately. It is impossible to build a country, you can create a state. And the greatest territorial acquisitions are not the merit of the Romanovs, but of the era of Ivan the Terrible and Boris Godunov, when Siberia was annexed.
            Ermak, Dezhnev, Khabarov... this is their merit, and not the Romanovs, who looked at the country only as their real estate and a tool for their enrichment and entertainment.

            And it was not the Bolsheviks who destroyed the empire, but Nicholas II himself with his abdication and his closest circle. The Bolsheviks reassembled most of the state.
            But when the communists lost power and those who began to sing the praises of “Russia, which we lost,” came, the process of disintegration was resumed.
            It is not the communists, but rather the anti-communists (among whom you can be counted) who are the greatest threat to the territorial integrity of our country.

            Quote: Olgovich
            and thank God - otherwise we would never have known the TRUTH - look at HOW he was tortured, like other commanders and ordinary people


            The fact that he was tortured is not proof that he is right. It is only the IMHO of this citizen, nothing more. It is certainly not for you to decide "what is truth".

            Quote: Olgovich
            and for whom and why are these statements written? So that they...won't be believed?


            Certainly not for generals. Generals should not base their actions on the contents of newspaper articles...
            That the country was heading for a major war was obvious even to a smart sergeant. Considering the dynamics of the army's growth, the deployment of new units and formations, the pace of rearmament and equipping with new combat equipment.
            1. -7
              27 June 2025 13: 30
              Quote: Illanatol
              The final defeat in war is far worse than a lost battle.

              What war can compare to the losses in...one 41 years?
              Quote: Illanatol
              The Romanovs didn't take on anything, don't lie. The Russian Empire in WWI was a group of six democracies and fought for the interests of others. Russia didn't need that war at all, there was nothing to share with the Kaiser.

              study history - in WWI Russia was on the second front, in WWII the USSR was on the first with corresponding losses: the USSR was bleeding, and the allies were waiting/sending for him to weaken Hitler for them.
              And remember, the USSR did not need the war.
              Quote: Illanatol
              And you express yourself illiterately. It is impossible to build a country, but you can create a state.

              lol learn Russian first
              Quote: Illanatol
              And the greatest territorial acquisitions are not the merit of the Romanovs, but of the era of Ivan the Terrible and Boris Godunov.

              Now study history - 75% of the territory was under the Romanovs
              Quote: Illanatol
              The Bolsheviks reassembled most of the state.

              before the VORs there were no independences and it didn’t stink - that’s a fact.
              The Bolsheviks tore Russia into 16 parts and erased the name Russia from the world map - fact.
              These parts became independent under them - fact
              Quote: Illanatol
              The fact that he was tortured is not proof that he was right.

              is - he did NOT confess, that's why they tortured him and the court confirmed it
              Quote: Illanatol
              Certainly not for generals. Generals should not base their actions on the contents of newspaper articles.

              and 170 million - cattle, for them it will do? I would like to see the general doubting...
              1. +5
                27 June 2025 13: 49
                What war can compare to the losses in...one 41 years?

                And what war can compare to the Great Patriotic War? You are a champion of logical errors.
                study history - in WWI Russia was on the second front, in WWII the USSR was on the first

                And? What merit do the Romanovs have here? In your formulation, this thesis generally looks like Russia was simply not considered a worthy opponent in WWI.
                before the VORs there were no independences and it didn’t stink - that’s a fact.

                And did the outskirts reek of the struggle for independence? lol
                is-he did NOT confess

                And those who confessed under pressure... are guilty. What logic you have.
                and 170 million are cattle, will that be enough for them?

                What's good enough for them anyway?
          2. +5
            27 June 2025 13: 15
            No one had any lesions on the level of Kyiv, Vyazemsky, etc.

            So let's write down that in Olgovich's universe the capitulation of the country within a month "does not count".
            Yes, the same Romanovs placed the main burden of WWI on the Anglo-Franks

            The last time you used such nonsense, I asked you to name and list the specific actions of the Romanovs so that the main burden would fall on the "Anglo-Francs". There was no answer.
            And yes, in Nazi Germany three thousand times fewer people were shot than in the USSR.

            So what? The fact that Nazi Germany is closer to your soul doesn't have to be demonstrated to everyone.
            and for whom and why are these statements written?

            For those who are called the masses. Because these same masses cannot change the situation for the better when they get acquainted with the real picture, but they can make it worse. It is so elementary.
      3. + 14
        26 June 2025 14: 41
        But I probably won’t be mistaken if I say that our main problem was Stalin’s fatal delusion; we believed him unquestioningly at the time, but he turned out to be blind and disoriented everyone with the notorious TASS report of June 14, 1941.”

        In the early 60s, Gorbatov worked on his memoirs, “The Life of a Soldier,” which he brought to the magazine “Novy Mir,” headed by the poet Alexander Tvardovsky. The memoirs were published in a magazine version, receiving a different title at Tvardovsky’s suggestion: “Years and Wars.”

        Gorbatov wrote his memoirs at the height of Khrushchev's "fight against the personality cult". And so it was simply impossible not to add a bucket of shit. Even Zhukov was not shy.
        1. + 11
          26 June 2025 15: 58
          And so it was simply impossible not to add a bucket of shit. Even Zhukov was not shy.
          Zhukov could not forgive Joseph for the "trophy case" for his junk post-war affairs. Then Khrushchev Kukuruzny used him and threw him away, like a well-known rubber product. And in his "Memories and Reflections" Zhukov was not too lazy to lick Brezhnev - he wrote how he wanted to talk to Colonel Brezhnev near Novorossiysk. By the way, this episode is not in Brezhnev's "Malaya Zemlya" himself.
          1. +8
            26 June 2025 16: 26
            Quote: Aviator_
            wrote how he wanted to talk to Colonel Brezhnev near Novorossiysk
            He didn't want to talk to him, but to consult with him. The marshal with the colonel wink wink
            1. +7
              26 June 2025 18: 42
              He didn't want to talk to him, but to consult with him. The marshal with the colonel
              That's right, I licked it - it couldn't go any deeper.
          2. +1
            26 June 2025 18: 11
            Personal memories. 1973. My wife and I are on holiday near Novorossiysk. At that time, in the city centre, there was a restaurant in the form of a huge beer barrel. Near the restaurant, on a cart, sat a legless man in a vest, who, for a mug of beer, told everyone who wanted the following story:
            During the war I fought here in the landing force. And one day we were going on a boat to Malaya Zemlya. And next to me was a colonel. Suddenly a fascist started firing at us with a cannon. The colonel was thrown overboard by the blast wave. And I jumped and got him. And it turned out to be Brezhnev. If I had known, I would never have saved him.

            wassat
            1. +7
              26 June 2025 18: 48
              As for professional "veterans". This one worked for the public, they paid well, and again, a fig in the pocket. In 1973, things in the USSR were more than successful. And the "veteran" is very reminiscent of Lieutenant Schmidt's son Shura Balaganov, who briskly expounded the contents of the brochure "Uprising on the Battleship Potemkin".
              1. +3
                26 June 2025 18: 50
                It was not for nothing that I wrote "a man in a vest"
                1. +3
                  26 June 2025 18: 51
                  Naturally, wounded on the "Kolchak fronts". This is a way of earning money.
          3. -9
            27 June 2025 11: 53
            Quote: Aviator_
            Zhukov could not forgive Joseph for the "trophy case" for his junk post-war affairs.

            Jshvili could not forgive the Marshal of Victory for his well-deserved glory and entrusted the six and the real junk dealer and thief Avakumov (read the protocol of the search of this thief) with the reprisal (and how did the junk dealer Vasya Stalin get through? wink ):
            "...I didn't do anything myself. Stalin gave me instructions, and I
            performed"


            Zhukov was not convicted.

            Zhukov, despite all his shortcomings, is an intelligent and honest man:
            ...rolling up their sleeves, with an axe in their hands, they chopped off heads. I'm speaking figuratively.

            Voices. Correct.

            ZHUKOV: I'll tell you about it now. I have material, I'm responsible for every word I say, the documents have the original signatures of these comrades I'll be talking about.

            From the documents available in the archives of the Military Collegium of the Tribunal27, in the archives of the Central Committee, it is clear that from February 27, 1937 to November 12, 1938, the NKVD received from Stalin, Molotov, and Kaganovich the sanction for the conviction by the Military Collegium and the Supreme Court, the sanction for the death penalty for 38 people.

            The sanction was given, as a rule, to leading officials of party, soviet, Komsomol and trade union bodies, as well as to people's commissars, their deputies, major business leaders, prominent military workers, writers, and cultural and artistic leaders.

            Giving sanction to bring to trial by the Military Collegium, Stalin, Molotov, Kaganovich determined the measure of punishment in advance, and the Military Collegium only formalized29 this measure of punishment. The lists sent to Stalin's Central Committee by Yezhov were compiled for an extremely large number of people. These lists of people who were to be shot indicated only the surname, first name and patronymic of the convicted and the category under which they should be judged. Yezhov proposed this in advance. These lists did not even indicate the year of birth or party affiliation, it was not indicated why this man should be sentenced to death.

            The sanction for sentencing was also given for a large number at once. For example, Stalin and Molotov on one day - note - November 12, 1938 sanctioned the execution of 3 people.

            Voices. Horror..

            ZHUKOV: I don’t know if they read the list. After all, for 3 people, you know how many pages you have to read, not to mention that you had to ask why, who is this person? Like cattle, they were sent according to a list: so many bulls, so many cows, so many sheep.

            On November 21, 1938, the NKVD was presented with a list for sanctioning the execution of 292 people, including 45 former members and candidates for membership in the Central Committee, 28 former members of the CPC and KSC, members of the Audit Commission, 12 former secretaries of regional and territorial committees, 26 former people's commissars, deputy people's commissars, and chairmen of regional executive committees, 149 responsible employees of the people's commissariats, etc. After reviewing this list, Stalin, Molotov, and Kaganovich sanctioned the death penalty for 229 people, including 23 former members and candidates for membership in the Central Committee, 22 former members of the CPC and KSC, 12 former secretaries of regional committees, 21 former people's commissars, 136 former employees of the people's commissariats, and 15 former military workers.
            1. +6
              27 June 2025 13: 05
              to the junk dealer and thief Avakumov

              Maybe a certain "Avakumov" was a "hoarder and thief", but V.S.AбAkumov, Colonel General, Chief of SMERSH, and later Minister of the MGB was neither one nor the other. You couldn't even spell his last name correctly.
              1. -4
                27 June 2025 13: 47
                Quote: Amateur
                Maybe a certain "Avakumov" was a "hoarder and thief", but V.S. Abakumov, Colonel General, Head of SMERSH, and then Minister of the MGB was neither one nor the other. You couldn't even spell his last name correctly

                What, general? He was stripped of his ranks and awards and executed for treason, terrorist attacks, etc.
                And yes, for you and Stalin, the Prosecutor General of the USSR:
                To Comrade STALIN I.V.



                I report that the USSR Prosecutor's Office has conducted searches and compiled inventories of property belonging to former Minister V.S. Abakumov.

                The property was described in Abakumov’s two city apartments and in his dacha near Moscow.

                Since 1943, Abakumov lived in house No. 8 on Telegrafny Lane with his wife, T. A. Smirnova, with whom he had been in a de facto marriage since 1930, occupying an apartment of 120 square meters.

                In the summer of 1948, Abakumov got together without registering the marriage with an employee of the Ministry of State Security, citizen Smirnova A.N., and an apartment was prepared for him in house No. 11 on Kolpachny Lane, measuring 300 square meters, occupying the entire second floor of the building. This building belongs to the Moscow City Council. To arrange Abakumov's apartment, 16 families consisting of 48 people were resettled from the second floor of the building2.

                Both of these apartments, with a total area of ​​420 square meters, are still registered to Abakumov.

                Only one person currently lives in the 120-meter apartment on Telegrafny Lane: Abakumov's first wife, T. A. Smirnova. The apartment she occupied was decorated in mahogany, Karelian birch, oak, and furnished with expensive, stylish furniture.

                For the major reconstruction of the second floor of the house No. 11 on Kolpachny Lane Abakumov spent a lot of money on his second apartment. The entrance to Abakumov's apartment, the vestibule and the staircase are finished with marble. The walls of the three rooms are upholstered in silk and other fabrics and finished with expensive types of wood. The walls and ceiling of the study are finished with walnut wood3. The entire apartment is furnished with expensive, stylish furniture made of Karelian birch, walnut and mahogany..

                In both apartments and at Abakumov's dacha there was a large quantity of various valuable property, among which items of foreign origin predominated. In particular, the following was discovered:

                1. Woolen fabrics in pieces up to 15 meters in size, mainly foreign - 751 meters;

                silk fabrics in lengths up to 40 meters, also mainly of foreign origin - 1.453 meters.

                Together with other types of fabric, a total of 2.450 meters of fabrics are described4.

                According to rough estimates, this manufactory alone costs about 350.000 rubles.

                Etc. - the list of stolen goods is too long.

                He even... robbed his own ministry... A thief..
                1. +2
                  27 June 2025 13: 54
                  Yes, not an apartment, but a warehouse of a manufactory. After all, how much space it took up, probably Abakumov himself lived in his "mother-in-law's" room.
                  1. -5
                    27 June 2025 13: 59
                    yes, there is a factory there that will make your hair stand on end
                  2. +3
                    27 June 2025 14: 05
                    Together with other types of fabric, a total of 2.450 meters of fabrics are described4.

                    According to rough estimates, this manufactory alone costs about 350.000 rubles.

                    Moreover, a meter of fabric costs 35 dollars (!!!). That's all you need to know about such "revelations". What's especially funny is
                    7000 foreign buttons

                    It's as if he opened an underground studio lol
            2. +2
              27 June 2025 13: 21
              Please note that on November 12, 1938, 3 people were sanctioned for execution.

              Voices. Horror.

              ZHUKOV: I don't know if they read the list. After all, for 30 people, you know how many sheets you have to read

              How primitive.
              So the top management should first perform the functions of investigative bodies, and then the judicial ones? Seriously? And for what reason?
              Particularly impressive is the elevation to the status of an argument (well, since you bothered to highlight this text) of a phrase that includes “I don’t know.”
        2. -6
          27 June 2025 11: 02
          Quote: Amateur
          And so it was simply impossible not to add a bucket of shit.

          It's sad that the truth for you is... a bucket of shit.

          And Gorbatov went through such tortures that you could never even dream of, without slandering anyone or surrendering to the executioners. An absolutely honest and fearless man who always told the truth.

          P.S. many "memoirs" before 1953 will warm your soul with the "true" truth.
          1. +4
            27 June 2025 13: 07
            And Gorbatov went through such tortures that you could never even dream of, without incriminating anyone or surrendering to the executioners.

            Did you personally torture them or did you read too much of Khrushchev-Solzhenitsyn nonsense?
            1. -4
              27 June 2025 13: 53
              Quote: Amateur
              And Gorbatov went through such tortures that you could never even dream of, without incriminating anyone or surrendering to the executioners.

              Did you personally torture them or did you read too much of Khrushchev-Solzhenitsyn nonsense?

              What's wrong with you? Read Gorbatov's memoirs
              1. +3
                27 June 2025 13: 56
                What's wrong with you? Read Gorbatov's memoirs

                I have already written once when and where these memoirs were published. I will not repeat it specially for you. I am lazy.
                1. -3
                  27 June 2025 14: 01
                  It is known where - in the USSR.

                  Can you refute the arrest, torture, pickaxe in Kolyma?
      4. +7
        26 June 2025 14: 57
        And under whose leadership were the most terrible defeats in military history in 41,42 and XNUMX?

        The most terrible defeats in our history are Kalka, Klushino and Tsushima. All of them led to the temporary liquidation of statehood. 41 and 42 did not lead to this. A foal's tear is not an argument.
        1. -6
          27 June 2025 12: 07
          Quote: Redoubt
          The most terrible defeats in our history are Kalka, Klushino and Tsushima. All of them led to temporary liquidation statehood

          belay lol they didn't affect anything. What... lost statehood?
          Quote: Redoubt
          A foal's tear is not an argument.

          Well, yes: only from June 1941 to January 1942 the total number of Soviet prisoners amounted to 3,9 mln; after the winter of 1941-1942, of them remained alive 1,1 million people. Do you understand the SCALE? And then millions of killed and maimed are not an argument, and... no one is to blame.
          1. -1
            28 June 2025 16: 10
            they didn't affect anything. What... lost statehood?

            15 years after Kalka, Rus' submits to the Horde and becomes part of it as an ulus.
            After Klushino, the Poles enter Moscow and organize the Seven Boyars. The head of the Polish garrison in the Kremlin actually rules the country. This ends with the feat of Hermogen, Minin and Pozharsky. Have you heard of such people?
            Tsushima led to the Russian Revolution and a catastrophic decline in the reputation of the authorities.
            After 41 years there was 45.
            I understand the scale, on May 9, 1945, all of Germany, the Wehrmacht and their allies surrendered. And that's millions of enemies.
            Claims regarding the fate of prisoners are to Germany. Incidentally, it signed the Geneva Convention on the Treatment of Prisoners.
            1. -3
              29 June 2025 08: 59
              Quote: Redoubt
              15 years after Kalka, Rus' submits to the Horde and becomes part of it as an ulus

              15 years after the 25th Congress of the CPSU, the USSR disappeared. And?

              Tsushima didn't mean anything at all - the outcome of the war was decided on land
              Quote: Redoubt
              After 41 years there was 45.

              45 does not justify 41 in any way. Because the USSR had EVERYTHING to avoid 41.
              Quote: Redoubt
              complaints about the fate of prisoners are against Germany

              And those thanks to whom 4 million found themselves in captivity for six months...not guilty? No one is guilty?
      5. +5
        26 June 2025 15: 10
        Stalin's name given to mountain peaks, factories, newspapers, steamships, cities, taekwons, guns, cars, tens of thousands of monuments during his lifetime, a wave of praise everywhere and in everything, etc. - this confirms.

        "Now we need a toast to the true commander and great worker of the war, without whom there would not have been this great victory. Let's drink to Comrade Khrulyov" (C)
        Stalin during a gala evening in the Kremlin dedicated to the victory in the Great Patriotic War.
  9. + 12
    26 June 2025 08: 27
    Stalin deserved this high title. His enormous, simply titanic work, which transformed an agrarian country into a world economic and military superpower, which offered the planet an alternative path of development, still affects Russia's position as a great power.

    Joseph Stalin was the only generalissimo in the history of Russia who not only held the highest military rank in the country, but was also its leader. Under his leadership, Russia-USSR was prepared for war: the army, the economy and society. The Union became the most powerful industrial power, which was not only able to withstand the war with almost all of Europe led by Hitler's Germany, but also to achieve a brilliant victory. The Soviet armed forces became the most powerful force on the planet.

    The Soviet Union became a superpower, which in the field of science and advanced technologies, education and culture was a world leader, leading humanity into the future. The Red Empire was then a kind of "beacon" for the entire planet, instilling hope in humanity for a bright future. In Russia, a society of knowledge, service and creation was built, based on the ethics of conscience and social justice.

    Golden words!!! A good article, correct and most importantly very necessary in our time, more such articles should be published in the media. And the fact that Joseph Vissarionovich deserved this honorary title is indisputable. As far as I know, the only award that Stalin valued most of all and wore almost always was the Gold Medal "Hammer and Sickle" of the Hero of Socialist Labor. And he more than deserved this award.
    1. +4
      26 June 2025 14: 31
      Quote: AK-1945
      A good article, correct and most importantly very necessary in our time, more articles like this should be published in the media.

      I can only recommend the book by A. Bushkov "Stalin. The Red Monarch" and "Stalin. The Ice Throne". You can have different attitudes towards this author, but in these books he very accurately and with all the documents, showed the enormous work and struggle of I.V. Stalin.
      1. 0
        26 June 2025 16: 03
        Thank you, dear Egoza, for the information. I will definitely find and read these books.
        P.S. If you happen to have them in electronic form, I would be very grateful if you could send them to me.
        1. +3
          26 June 2025 17: 39
          Look here.
          https://bookscafe.net/book/bushkov_aleksandr-krasnyy_monarh-5182.html
          It will be a strong feeling.
          You can buy them live on Ozon. But they are expensive.
          1. +2
            26 June 2025 17: 59
            Thank you very much Mikhail.
        2. 0
          27 June 2025 07: 48
          https://readli.net/stalin-ledyanoy-tron-s-prilozheniyami/
          You can watch (download) here. Or read online if the download is not complete
      2. +1
        26 June 2025 19: 58
        One BUT! Stalin was not a monarch, and all his decisions were coordinated with the Central Committee (except during wartime)
  10. + 17
    26 June 2025 08: 38
    Stalin is worthy of this title! There are no people of such caliber today.
    1. + 12
      26 June 2025 09: 15
      Quote: Million
      Nowadays there are no people of such caliber.

      Our people are talented despite the inadequacy of the current education system and the system in general. We have plenty of natural talents, but who will let them come to power and implement plans for the development of the entire people, and not a handful of "chosen ones"? wink
      The Bolshevik Party no longer exists, with the help of which Stalin emerged from Dzhugashvili, and the country of Soviets emerged from backward tsarist Russia.
      Official propaganda monitors the "temperature in the cauldron" and effectively brainwashes the controlled population to suit the goals of the ruling class.
      1. +2
        26 June 2025 15: 04
        I would like to note that Stalin is a historical giant, of course. Just like Peter the Great. But Peter the Great was expected for almost a hundred years after the Time of Troubles. After the Time of Troubles of the 90s, we also need to wait and give time for all the mud to settle. In his time, Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov (Peter the Great's grandfather) coped well with this task - calming the country and giving it a break. The current generation of politicians are performing the same task as Mikhail Fedorovich. So we need to wait for the giants, and not blame the authorities for where they are.
        It is stupid to speak in associations, but the conventional Vladimir Vladimirovich is not Pyotr Alekseevich or Joseph Vissarionovich. This is Mikhail Fedorovich.
        The times are such. Ivan Kalita could not go to the Battle of Kulikovo, but he was able to prepare it for his grandson.
  11. +9
    26 June 2025 08: 40
    And yet, the military rank of the leader of the country in Russia has a mythical and prophetic meaning.
    For example, the military rank of Generalissimo is associated with a person who gathered the original Russian lands into an Empire, after the liberal sovereign who had only the military rank of colonel destroyed this entire Empire. Well, as a result of such a Feat before the Russian Empire, the Feat of the entire Red Empire he had collected, under his leadership, in the most terrible Great Patriotic War, and he was given the military rank of Generalissimo. By the way, today's liberal sovereign also has only the military rank of colonel...
  12. +8
    26 June 2025 08: 56
    Alexander has such swings that it takes your breath away. Sometimes he puts Germany and the USSR on the same level, and sometimes he writes such /strangely enough, fair/ articles.
  13. + 10
    26 June 2025 10: 20
    Bring STALINGRAD back to the map of Russia!
  14. +5
    26 June 2025 12: 50
    I am not Georgian - I am Russian of Georgian origin!
  15. +6
    26 June 2025 13: 51
    The current leaders of countries, both in Russia and in the world, and especially in Europe, are pygmies compared to Stalin.
    1. 0
      27 June 2025 04: 10
      You're flattering them! You can't even call them dwarfs, more like amoebas.
  16. -6
    26 June 2025 14: 04
    Nothing will change in Rus' until the generation of serfs dies out.
    What is important to a serf is a ration of food, some kind of roof over his head, and that he, a serf, can praise the wise king.
    And I haven't thought yet how to make my life and the life of my children better... the main thing is rations. And so that they fear the Tsar.
    Because of this, the half-starved serf, for some reason, thinks that it means that they are afraid of him, the poor serf.
    And this is the main meaning of a serf's life)))
    Not to live in abundance, but to be feared as a hungry and poor slave.
    1. +2
      26 June 2025 15: 07
      It is not the serfs, but the passionate ones who arrange troubled times by playing on the simple feelings of the serfs.
      1. 0
        26 June 2025 19: 57
        The ruling class of capitalists (in the person of specific figures) rules and plays on the feelings of the serfs (and some abstract passionaries)
        1. -1
          28 June 2025 16: 11
          So capitalists don't have troubled times.)) Everything is clear.
  17. +3
    26 June 2025 14: 05
    Only on June 26, 1945, by decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the highest military rank of “Generalissimo of the Soviet Union” was introduced, and on June 27 it was awarded to Joseph Stalin.

    ,,,also on this day he was awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union and he was awarded a second Order of Victory.
  18. +3
    26 June 2025 14: 32
    Anti-Soviet Samsonov in his element.
    The bankrupt capitalist yes-men have already put Stalin on a pedestal.
    We read the author - "Stalin revived Great Russia in the form of the Soviet Empire, won the Second World War, created the nuclear shield and sword of our Motherland." Stalin did not revive any great Russia in the form of the Soviet Empire:)
    What nonsense. They decided to capitalize on Stalin and put his image to their service, and look, they'll soon canonize him.
    Having shit themselves on all fronts - ideological, economic, national, military - the pochvenniks, banner-bearers, traditionalists, tsarist-worshippers, Eurasians and other scum - suddenly became Stalin's admirers. They are trying to cover up their ugly ideological loins, which are visible through the holey tricolors, banners and standards, with red calico.
    It is clear that there is no mention of the socialist economy, the role of the All-Union Communist Party as the organizer of the victory of the Soviet people. Stalin did everything alone - because he studied at the seminary.
    1. +4
      26 June 2025 17: 44
      The compradors' attempts to ingratiate themselves with Stalin cannot harm him.
      Dirt doesn't stick to gold.
      As for the face of saints, there is an interesting point here.
      In his simplicity of soul, Stalin is called a satrap. But a satrap is the tsar's viceroy.
      Who is the Tsar for whom Stalin is only a viceroy?
    2. -1
      26 June 2025 19: 52
      The law on inciting and rocking the boat was recently adjusted, now any criticism of the authorities can be fit under it, saying that it sows discord and instability in society! So comrade, be careful!
  19. +6
    26 June 2025 14: 35
    Quote: teo28
    What is important to a serf is a ration of food, some kind of roof over his head, and that he, a serf, can praise the wise king.

    Did I understand correctly that you, as a higher being, do not need a roof over your head, or rations, or the praise of wise politicians? Right?
  20. +1
    26 June 2025 14: 39
    Quote: Illanatol
    And the most shameful is that of the Czechoslovakians, who surrendered their country without firing a single shot.

    Stop fantasizing - the British, French and Poles surrendered Czechoslovakia, leaving them without the support of these countries and the USSR.
    1. +2
      26 June 2025 17: 45
      The President of Czechoslovakia was later proud of the capitulation.
      1. 0
        26 June 2025 23: 13
        President Benes was a supporter of rapprochement with the USSR, which resulted in military-technical cooperation and the conclusion of a treaty on joint defense - directed against Germany. Poland refused to let the CA through its territory - the result is known - the initiators of the drain of Czechoslovakia paid a high price for their stupidity and anti-Sovietism.
        1. 0
          26 June 2025 23: 17
          This is all known.
          But the initiators of the drain eventually defeated Germany. And Benes was proud that Czechoslovakia suffered almost no damage from the war.
          1. +2
            26 June 2025 23: 20
            I don't know anything about Benes' pride, I don't give a damn about it.
            The initiator of the drain was defeated by the European Nazis with the help of the European communists, whose vanguard was the USSR. The only difference is that the USSR tried in every way to prevent the war, while the degenerates from the City of London and Warsaw in every way fanned it.
            1. +2
              27 June 2025 08: 29
              I think exactly the same.
              Except that the City is not degenerate. They knew exactly what they wanted.
              Also note that in 38 Germany and Poland were still allies.
              Historiography somehow evades the reasons why they did not attack the USSR together.
              1. -1
                27 June 2025 17: 55
                Quote: Pereira
                I think exactly the same.
                Except that the City is not degenerate. They knew exactly what they wanted.
                Also note that in 38 Germany and Poland were still allies.
                Historiography somehow evades the reasons why they did not attack the USSR together.

                What degenerates, - as a result of the war in Europe, the USA, by agreement of 1943 with Great Britain, - received free access to the markets of the British Empire - after which it (the empire) collapsed. However, capitalists are like that - grandfathers Marx, Engels and Lenin wrote about this long ago - a capitalist will sell the rope for his own hanging...
                But history, as we know, teaches nothing - as a result of the SVO, the Russian Federation will finally lose its economic sovereignty...
                1. +2
                  27 June 2025 20: 44
                  This is where you are very much mistaken.
                  Grandfather Lenin had nothing to do with the collapse of the British Empire.
                  The empire was destroyed by Roosevelt. This was his condition for helping England in WWII.
                  The markets of Great Britain were given to the elite of the USA. As a result, by 1945 the USA produced more than half of all world production. So they are not degenerates, they are the masters of the planet. The degenerates are those who gave it away.
                  1. 0
                    27 June 2025 21: 34
                    I wrote to you about this, about the loss of markets - and you write to me about the same thing. The question was that capitalists often cannot plan long-term - they do not have such a function in their heads. Therefore, capitalism is its own gravedigger.
                    1. 0
                      28 June 2025 12: 09
                      And again you are mistaken.
                      Every capitalist is different. Ours, the comprador, doesn't know how.
                      The Anglo-Saxons are doing it. For generations to come.
                      Some lost markets, and some picked them up. This is not even a loss, but a redistribution between groups.
  21. 0
    26 June 2025 15: 30
    The victory in the Battle of Stalingrad would not have happened without Stalin, it did not turn out exactly as he planned, but we won, as did Operation Bagration, also thanks to him.
  22. +1
    26 June 2025 18: 18
    Stalin is a man respected by my generation. I never doubted and am glad that even today you recognize his strength and greatness. am
  23. +1
    26 June 2025 19: 13
    Ah, Stalin's name, Stalingrad is afraid to return. It might happen that, against his background, the people will see clearly who is who.
  24. 0
    26 June 2025 19: 49
    1) The USSR was not an empire!!! If you don't think so, look up the definition of empire in the dictionary!!!
    2) Russia-USSR - is this something like how Ukraine-Rus was invented next door?
    3) What is this term "Russian superethnos"!? Is this something from the classification of ubermensch and untermensch?
  25. +1
    26 June 2025 20: 02
    The author modestly kept silent about the fate of Ivan VI, whom he mentioned, who was imprisoned in infancy and eventually killed. And for some reason he is not counted among the saints or among the passion-bearers, although he really suffered for nothing.
  26. +1
    26 June 2025 23: 45
    Although under Stalin, given his power, he could have had any title, either directly or indirectly, and although I don't particularly like Stalin, the man didn't look to the side even on the sweatiest days and, in principle, was a capable organizer, having gained experience back in the days of Tsaritsyn. This, of course, doesn't cancel out his negative qualities - but I don't think that in war conditions, as a leader, one of the Bolsheviks at the very top would have done more than IVS.
    Let's leave aside his rather dubious pre-war external line and much else.
    In the war, the man was "in fact" literate and earned this title through his deeds.
    1. +1
      27 June 2025 13: 50
      Let's leave aside his rather dubious pre-war external line and much else.

      What is it about her that you don't like? Until the summer of 1940, Stalin did exactly what he could in that situation.
      1. -1
        27 June 2025 19: 39
        I am talking about some specific episodes that messed things up but ultimately there was no profit, and later there were losses from this. The Soviet-Finnish War, for example. Right before the war, it quarreled our already feeble relations with the West and essentially torpedoed the line of normalization and rapprochement (we joined the League of Nations in 1935, closed the Comintern, etc.).
        The chain of events - the partition of Poland and the Soviet-Finnish War - gave the West the feeling that although the USSR had "seemingly" curtailed the export of revolution, it was nevertheless ready to carry out active external expansion.
        Also, the policy of the USSR in the interbellum was a clear case of sitting on two chairs - on the one hand, we were increasing foreign trade and interaction with foreign countries, on the other hand, our rhetoric regarding capitalist states and their policies and elites did not change, this is reminiscent of a conflict between the right and left hands during any activity that requires the participation of both.
        In our historiography it is customary to consider the toning up of the USSR in the context of the activity and intrigues of the capitalist powers, however the opposite picture is also true - the USSR with its unreliability, unpredictability and potential threat toned up the capitalist states to no lesser extent. Considering the joint contractual basis of the states adjacent to the USSR - in England and France or informal partnership relations (the Baltics + the Scandinavian states, the Scandinavian states), the tension of our neighbors was constantly transmitted further along the chain and to the whole of Europe. This state did not subside not only because of the aggressive intrigues of the Western capitalist states, but also because of the peculiarities of Stalin's foreign policy and Stalin's foreign propaganda.

        If in 1940 someone in the WB had been asked whether it was possible to have an alliance with the Bolsheviks against Hitler, I think it would have been perceived as a very bad joke. At least for this reason, the WBers were quite seriously preparing to destroy the Baku oil regions with aircraft in case the USSR took the pro-German side in 1940. They considered this quite probable. In the case of our historical propaganda, this is presented as a kind of paradox, but in their system of coordinates and vision it was more than logical; for them, the authorities of the Union were unreliable and unpredictable people.
  27. 0
    27 June 2025 08: 10
    Quote: Dozorny - severa
    Stop fantasizing - Czechoslovakia was surrendered


    Stop fantasizing. As the saying goes, "a drowning man will save himself."
    The Czechs are not little children, they themselves had to defend their homeland. Why should strangers do it? Czechoslovakia had more industrial potential than Italy and the army was not that weak. They could have fought... but they gave up without a fight. A disgrace, you can't call it anything else. The Serbs, being weaker, still did not submit completely, and these "Slavic brothers" later honestly worked for Nazism.
  28. +1
    27 June 2025 08: 24
    Quote: Pereira
    This is all known.
    But the initiators of the drain eventually defeated Germany. And Benes was proud that Czechoslovakia suffered almost no damage from the war.


    It was Stalin's USSR that defeated Germany first and foremost.
    The contribution of France (Petain) and Poland (pardon, the Polish Governorate General) was very modest. lol
  29. 0
    27 June 2025 13: 16
    Quote: Amateur
    Gorbatov wrote his memoirs at the height of Khrushchev's "fight against the personality cult." And so it was simply impossible not to add a bucket of shit.


    Well, that's it. As is known, under Khrushchev there was a large-scale reduction in the number of the Armed Forces. Who would want to be cut and retire early? So they had to "show political correctness", as they later began to say.
  30. 0
    27 June 2025 13: 24
    Quote: Knell Wardenheart
    Let's leave aside his rather dubious pre-war external line and much else.


    You can open the brackets. What is dubious? I think that the IVS acted quite competently. The only thing it made a mistake in was underestimating the meanness of Western democracies and especially the Polish leadership on the eve of WWII. After all, Stalin judged Poland by Pilsudski and his policies. Pilsudski, although he was an enemy of the USSR, was not a vile coward. But his successors... even in Poland silently admitted that the ministers of the pre-war Polish government had let their country down 200%, depriving it of even a scrap of sovereignty (the French managed to preserve such a scrap in Vichy). It is no coincidence that not a single minister who cowardly fled the country without even signing the capitulation entered Sikorski's government in exile.
  31. 0
    27 June 2025 13: 50
    He rightfully received this title! Eternal memory!
  32. 0
    27 June 2025 22: 07
    Article + How we miss Joseph Vissarionovich in our time...(
  33. -1
    28 June 2025 15: 29
    Quote: Pereira
    Some lost markets, and some picked them up. This is not even a loss, but a redistribution between groups.

    That's true, but English capital itself gave its markets to the Americans.
    And regarding the so-called "our comprador" - it is not ours at all, but part of the international monopoly - its servants. So capitalism is the same everywhere, and its monopolistic character and the subordination of industrial capital to financial capital were noted by Lenin in his works.
    That's why when some scumbag like Semin starts talking about the rivalry between Russian and foreign capital on the territory of the former Ukrainian SSR, you want to punch him in the face.
  34. 0
    29 June 2025 09: 13
    Quote: Dozorny - severa
    That's true, but English capital itself gave its markets to the Americans.


    Not himself, but he was forced to give it up. In exchange for the notorious "lend-lease".
    Otherwise, the English would have had walrus horseradish, and not military-technical assistance from the USA. Franklin Roosevelt told Churchill about it in plain text when he came running to ask the Yankees for help.

    Well, that's why the combination with the Third Reich was played out. First, the Yankees created the "bad guy" Hitler, pumped him up with credits and technology, and when the "bad guy" began to pose a real threat to European democracies, they made a big business out of getting rid of this threat. The result was the subjugation of European powers, and through their colonies, most of the world. The game was worth the candle, and the result of the work. What do the costs of thousands of tanks, planes, etc. mean, compared to such a prize - the status of the leader of the Western world and a superpower.
    They wanted to bend the USSR, but Stalin did not allow it. For which he received the "cold war", as a logical continuation of the Second World War, a combination to turn the USA into an "exceptional nation".
  35. 0
    14 December 2025 18: 29
    Stalin's personality can be debated at length. Considering the amount of dirt thrown at him, it's downright problematic.
    So, here's my personal opinion. And some impressions from my childhood.
    At least two of my relatives, who lived through Stalin's life, had his portraits hanging in their homes. And this was long after Khrushchev's "Exposure of the Cult of Personality." And these relatives of mine weren't downtrodden or dim-witted. They were respected people. Not bosses, no...
    And both of my grandmothers spoke very highly of him.
    I trust these people a little more than propagandists of all times and stripes.
    It is time.
    Second. Having lived my life, I've clearly realized that there are no such things as white and fluffy. Even at the population level. And speaking about the authorities in such a way is just...
    Good for everyone is, excuse me, worthlessness. More often than not, mediocrity. It's extremely difficult to live your life without stepping on anyone's toes.
    Such people will never reach the highest echelons of power in a huge country.
    So: Yes, there were likely some dark spots. Nevertheless, this man, this leader, did a great deal for the country. He certainly earned his place in history. And he certainly deserves fond memories and respect.