Putin: Serial production of the Oreshnik missile system, which has proven itself in combat conditions, is underway

44 800 68
Putin: Serial production of the Oreshnik missile system, which has proven itself in combat conditions, is underway

Serial production of the much-talked-about drug is underway in Russia rocket the Oreshnik medium-range missile system, which was announced by the country's President Vladimir Putin during a meeting with graduates of higher military educational institutions.

The Supreme Commander-in-Chief also noted that in a very short period of time, these weapons have proven themselves very well during combat operations in the SVO zone.



Serial production of the medium-range missile system "Oreshnik", which has proven itself very well in combat conditions, is underway

- Putin said.

Let us recall that the Russian president first announced the existence of a missile system called “Oreshnik” in Russia in November last year, when the MRBM was launched at the Yuzhmash plant in Dnepropetrovsk in response to permission from Kyiv’s Western partners to use the long-range missile. weapons for strikes deep into Russia.

In Ukraine, they claimed that the Oreshnik was launched from the Kapustin Yar test site, meaning that the missile's actual range was approximately 800-850 kilometers. The Ukrainian Defense Ministry also stated at the time that its peak speed was 11 Mach (more than 13 km/h).

Earlier, the American publication The National Interest wrote that Western countries do not have serious protection against the Russian Oreshnik.
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 15+
    23 June 2025 15: 59
    Serial production of the much-talked-about medium-range missile system Oreshnik is underway in Russia, as announced by the country's President Vladimir Putin during a meeting with graduates of higher military educational institutions.

    Our neighbors are restless, angry and envious, so good products will be very useful to us in the future.
    The main thing is that some idiot and pacifist doesn’t come to power and then cut them up for their sugary promises like our strategists in the 90s of the last century. soldier
    1. +8
      23 June 2025 16: 43
      I hope that everyone in Russia has already understood everything.
      There will never be anything like what happened under Yeltsin again.
      Even he began to understand after Yugoslavia.
      1. +1
        23 June 2025 17: 11
        There is no need to attribute Gorbachev's exploits to Yeltsin. It was he who signed the treaty on the destruction of our Pioneer missiles by the INF treaty, which fired at the entire East Coast of the United States from Anadyr. At the same time, the Oka missile (Iskander's mother) was eliminated. And when they remember the disarmament activists, the first thing to do is to spit on Brezhnev, who eliminated the finished 7 Tsar bombs, and their perfect carrier UR-500 was made by the Proton launch vehicle, which is still working properly.
        1. +5
          23 June 2025 17: 32
          Quote: hrych
          There is no need to attribute Gorbachev's exploits to Yeltsin.

          I agree, each of them wrote their own dark page.
          But under Yeltsin the nuclear briefcase stopped working in the Russian Federation.
          It's good that those times are in the past and there is no return to them.
      2. -5
        23 June 2025 17: 33
        In Russia, the entire ruling elite is completely liberal. What did they understand? Putin is a restraining factor for them. He will leave, and they will race to hand over and sell everything that is left in Russia.
        1. +1
          23 June 2025 17: 38
          You're oversimplifying things.
          Let's see in six months.
          1. -2
            23 June 2025 17: 41
            Yes, I don’t mind)) And what has the government planned for the next six months?
            1. +3
              23 June 2025 17: 42
              Quote: AlexSam
              What has the government planned for the next six months?

              I'm keeping my fingers crossed. So as not to jinx it...
              1. -2
                23 June 2025 17: 43
                God willing......
          2. -1
            23 June 2025 21: 57
            Quote: Alex777
            Let's see in six months.

            Why in six months? It seems the message was that AFTER Putin's replacement, the liberals would storm the federal-level power structures...
            So, it seems that VVP has organized the preparation of an administrative resource from among the participants of the SVO and other young administrators who share "conservative" values. I think that by 2030 VVP will decide on a "successor" from OURS.
            AHA.
            1. +2
              24 June 2025 03: 21
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              And what about in six months?

              This year, from May to September/October, a World Financial Crisis and a collapse of the World Financial System is expected or even scheduled. That is, now "at any moment". To cover up such a "screw-up" from the "owners of money", a war is usually needed to distract attention, so that the reasons can be attributed to it.
              And "oh Miracle" - on that solid day of June 22... on Sunday... something like that started. That means - SOON.
              Everybody fasten your seat belts and get ready. The world is about to shake hard.
              But when it shakes, a lot will be possible. Things that are impossible in principle now.
              1. -1
                24 June 2025 03: 34
                You've intrigued me. But I feel uneasy somehow, considering the titanic efforts of our Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Economy and the Central Bank to destroy Russia. I hope I don't overexert myself...
                1. +1
                  24 June 2025 04: 52
                  They are allowed to frolic until "the thunder strikes". And when it does... all these peppers and pepper shakers... well, you get the idea. They are here for now as representatives of the "highest authority" and in Russia there is no boss for them... But that's until the thunder strikes.
                  That's why Trump is behaving so strangely.
                  Maneuvers.
                  And they demand "bloodshed" from him.
                  Everything that happens now is almost irrelevant. What is important is what will happen "after". This is what everyone is preparing for now.
              2. 0
                24 June 2025 13: 12
                Quote: bayard
                This year, from May to September/October, a World Financial Crisis and a collapse of the World Financial System is expected or even scheduled. That is, now "at any moment". To cover up such a "screw-up" from the "owners of money", a war is usually needed to distract attention, so that the reasons can be attributed to it.

                And still...
                1. What if the "Global Financial Crisis" doesn't happen? If the Fed postpones or writes off the federal government's debt. Then WHAT???
                2. Is the "collective West" ready for the BIG BAD BOOM???
                Have they (unlike us and the whales) already rearmed themselves? Or do you seriously think that "boys in camouflage" with guns at the ready will run around the fields and villages? shooting at "bad guys"?
                Let me remind you:
                The US is rearming the Minutemen. The Sentinels are expected to arrive by 2031. The Nuts are going to be replaced by the Calambines. And this "event" will drag on until the 40s... I won't even mention the 6th generation flyer. And the GZO is only in the design and prototypes. And they still need to rearm the troops and naval forces... The striped satellites are even worse off...
                Well ???
                1. 0
                  24 June 2025 14: 51
                  Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                  1. What if the "Global Financial Crisis" does not happen?

                  "Annushka has already spilled the oil." Alas.
                  It should have happened a year or two ago, but it was delayed, flooded with money, so that it would coincide with Trump’s rule.
                  Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                  If the Fed postpones or writes off the federal government's debt. Then WHAT???

                  This will not happen. The owners of the money did not even want to lower the discount rate. They wanted to raise it, but the threat of an audit of Fort Knox by the Musk commission made them think twice, and the rate was simply not raised.
                  The owners/shareholders of the Federal Reserve System do not have American jurisdiction at all - the controlling stake belongs to European state banks and banking houses. This cartel was created specifically on the eve of WWI at the instigation of the Rothschilds.
                  The Rothschilds actually wanted to move the Federal Reserve System's clearing center to the City of London, so that they could manage the monstrous American debt from there. Because the Debt is not only the federal government's debt, but also the debts of states, counties, municipalities, households and businesses. They have long been three-digit figures in total. And the annual payment on them is the discount rate. Who would refuse such money?
                  Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                  2. Is the "collective West" ready for the BIG BAD BOOM???

                  Of course NOT. That's why they try to start wars on the periphery. Then a big regional war can be called the cause of the inevitable Financial Crisis. And to remove responsibility from themselves, to derevercize debts, to write off some, but only their own. And to stay at the top of the food chain.
            2. 0
              24 June 2025 11: 40
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              It seems the message was that AFTER Putin's replacement, the liberals would storm the federal-level power structures...

              I doubt it. Let's just see.
  2. 24+
    23 June 2025 16: 01
    And when did the "hazelnut" manage to prove itself? With one launch? That is, of course, it distinguished itself well, the world community even got its fur coat twisted, but it seems to me that one shot is not enough for this... request
    1. -14
      23 June 2025 16: 12
      Maybe we should have just compared the cost of developing and producing the hazelnut with the building it destroyed?
      1. -9
        23 June 2025 16: 42
        Well, a few broken floor slabs are obviously cheaper than the OES. That's obvious. There were no explosions. The neighboring workshops weren't damaged. So what next?
      2. -4
        23 June 2025 19: 39
        Quote: Clever man
        with the building he destroyed

        And also with the equipment in the building.
      3. KCA
        0
        26 June 2025 11: 46
        The cost of developing the Oreshnik specifically is most likely not high, it is a conventional RS-26 Rubezh ICBM, but someone started yelling that the range is less than 5500 km and the complex falls under the INF Treaty restrictions and they kept quiet about it, but look how it turned out, the Americans, I think, regretted that the development of the complex was formally closed
    2. 13+
      23 June 2025 16: 13
      Serial production of serious weapons begins with a whole complex of design, factory and state tests. The test program also includes a series of launches, starting with throwing and ending with a launch in combat equipment. Most likely, such a launch was the use of Oreshnik against the enemy in Ukraine. This was not the first practical launch, but only the first combat one. It justified all the technical and combat characteristics of the new missile system.
      1. -7
        23 June 2025 16: 20
        That is, its performance characteristics were confirmed during technical and combat testing. Good. And where did it manage to "prove itself well in combat conditions?" With one strike of a blank at Yuzhmash? what
        1. +8
          23 June 2025 16: 23
          So nuclear weapons once proved themselves well in Hiroshima and Nagasaki!
          You shouldn't talk like that about Oreshnik's blank. It's more complex than your home computer.
          1. -3
            23 June 2025 16: 32
            In technical circles, a "blank" is a missile without a warhead. It has only kinetic destructive properties. hi
      2. +3
        23 June 2025 16: 37
        Quote: Evgenijus
        Most likely, such a launch was the use of Oreshnik against the enemy in Ukraine. This was not the first practical launch, but only the first combat one.

        Absolutely right. This fact can already be entered into the Guinness Book of Records as the first combat use of a strategic ballistic missile in human history.
    3. -1
      23 June 2025 16: 22
      And when did the "hazelnut" manage to prove itself well? With one launch?

      They went quiet after that launch. Best recommendation laughing
      1. +1
        23 June 2025 16: 24
        Who went quiet?
        It seems like everything is going on as before.
      2. +4
        23 June 2025 16: 30
        They can only quiet down if this system is used en masse. The question is different: does it make sense to use something like this in non-nuclear equipment if there are cheaper means of destruction?
    4. 0
      23 June 2025 16: 48
      That's right. The weapon is good, but it hasn't been tested in combat conditions yet. On November 21, 2024, a non-nuclear Oreshnik missile was used against the Yuzhmash plant. But there is information that Ukraine's new ballistic missile is apparently the Hrim-2 (Thunder-2) missile, developed by the Yuzhnoye Design Bureau and manufactured by Yuzhmash in Dnepropetrovsk. Oreshnik was empty and couldn't really destroy anything there. And the fact that the plant is still standing says a lot. There is very little information, but the AI ​​writes that the Yuzhmash plant in Ukraine continues to operate.
      1. -1
        23 June 2025 19: 33
        There is very little information, AI writes that the Yuzhmash plant in Ukraine continues to operate.

        No words ...
        belay fool
    5. -1
      23 June 2025 23: 42
      Quote: ian
      And when did the "hazelnut" manage to prove itself well? With one launch?

      Do you think that not a single launch was made before the strike on Yuzhmash? I think that this strike was the final stage of testing already in combat conditions.
  3. -1
    23 June 2025 16: 02
    "Oreshnik", which has proven itself well in combat conditions

    Ukraine won't let you lie feel
  4. 11+
    23 June 2025 16: 05
    Such news that they even singled out black and lightning...
    Everything must be done quietly. Otherwise, they'll make a show out of the war. There was nothing like that during the Cold War.
    1. +2
      23 June 2025 16: 12
      I wanted to write about this too. They announced Oreshnik with a strike on the plant - and that's it, everything is quiet after that - let the enemy not know whether we have already done it, how much we have already, or whether we have not started doing it yet. And these announcements - it's as if we do not want to win, but we are doing everything to, like, "scare" our "esteemed Western partners" and freeze the conflict on Orcain and leave a nest of vipers there for the next generations, which will rot, stink and constantly bother us.
  5. +3
    23 June 2025 16: 06
    More contraceptives should be produced in the border states so that fewer Callas are born laughing
    1. 0
      23 June 2025 16: 39
      Yeah. Let's chip in for condoms. I'm ready. laughing
  6. -1
    23 June 2025 16: 07
    Yeah..., what can you say, and do we have many of these "higher military educational institutions" left? Serdyukov and Shoigu didn't quite "work hard enough", otherwise Vladimir Putin would have no one to speak to. And "Oreshnik", well, "Oreshnik", another one that has no analogues in the world, we've already "launched serial production" of many things, and where is it all?
    1. 0
      23 June 2025 16: 18
      How many of these "higher military educational institutions" do we have left?

      It's not about quantity.
      There is quite enough left.
      The sea of ​​universities is a throwback to the 90s.
      Better less, but better.
      1. -3
        23 June 2025 16: 38
        Better less, but better.

        Better like this: "better more, yes, better"!!!
        And let all enemies die from envy and malice.
      2. -1
        23 June 2025 19: 18
        That's right! That's why we now have a shortage of specialist officers in almost all specialties. Especially technicians and engineers of the Air Force. Officers who graduated from military departments are fighting. And "kharant" keeps telling us some horror stories. All this chatter from the screen will end badly for us.
        1. 0
          23 June 2025 19: 37
          Especially the Air Force technicians and engineers. The officers who have graduated from military departments are fighting.

          You are lying.
          Artillerymen - yes, they are needed in the SVO, air defense officers - the same. These are my military specialties
          Engineers for aircraft maintenance and weapons systems were not called up after the departments. This is my son's military specialty.
          1. -1
            24 June 2025 03: 20
            Yes, yes - you are right, I am deceiving you. You should share this "discovery" with my brother, a jacket officer, who has been written off for a year due to a concussion, and with a neighbor (he only just finished the military department, he didn't even serve), the neighbor now has one leg shorter than the other by five or six centimeters.
  7. +3
    23 June 2025 16: 07
    It's good that they are expanding production. Now we should also expand its application to particularly distinguished targets...
    1. +1
      23 June 2025 16: 13
      Without tiao hazelnut to apply complete waste and sloppiness
      1. +1
        23 June 2025 16: 19
        from tiao hazel to apply complete wastefulness and sloppiness

        You should have given Trump a hint the day before yesterday...
        1. +1
          23 June 2025 16: 40
          Did you launch the tram hazelnut yesterday?
          1. 0
            23 June 2025 19: 39
            Did you launch the tram hazelnut yesterday?

            Trump yesterday launched conventional precision weapons at more hazelnut trees than it would take us years to do.
            1. -2
              23 June 2025 19: 58
              The main thing is not to compare the economies of Russia and the States
      2. +5
        23 June 2025 17: 06
        It was a test, but no matter what, it would have been tested at the proving ground anyway, and now the right moment came, so it was not a waste but a normal test.
    2. +2
      23 June 2025 16: 40
      Now we would like to further expand its use against particularly distinguished targets.

      There is one, well, a very worthy target. It is located on the islands near Gayropa after the English Channel. It would be nice to send one or two nuts there, so that they could crunch and try them on the teeth...
  8. +1
    23 June 2025 16: 09
    Putin, at a meeting with Western journalists, put an English journalist in an awkward position when asked about the effectiveness of the Oreshnik strike. Not verbatim, your sources would not have survived the strike, don't talk nonsense. (Putin knows what happened and how, he is the head of state, he already had photographs of the aftermath of the strike on his desk almost online).
    1. -1
      23 June 2025 22: 14
      If only we had these photos, propaganda would have posted them to the whole world long ago - such a furor. So far, nothing but talk, unfortunately
  9. +1
    23 June 2025 16: 15
    Western countries have no serious defense against the Russian "Oreshnik"... but they don't have any non-serious ones either :)
    1. 0
      23 June 2025 16: 17
      And in general there are only gays, lesbians and migrants there. They will fall apart any day now.
  10. +3
    23 June 2025 16: 22
    And how did the hazelnut prove itself in combat conditions? Nobody knows about that... It is very premature to draw conclusions based on a single launch without a warhead. Political will is needed to use it, but is there any?
  11. +2
    23 June 2025 16: 23
    How can we talk about a recommendation in combat conditions when there was only 1 launch? We can already talk about 5 launches, but we can judge by one.
  12. +1
    23 June 2025 16: 29
    Have you tried it on pig-faces? Have you tried it! Now into production! wink
  13. +1
    23 June 2025 16: 33
    The hazelnut tree should be made in a mine version.
  14. +3
    23 June 2025 16: 34
    The EU and any countries nearby (and NATO is everywhere with its air force) must be available for shelling with conventional munitions (and pure thermonuclear ones) at any time.
    Because a lot of questions can arise with inadequate neighbors.
  15. -6
    23 June 2025 16: 49
    And why didn't the Grandmaster himself tell us about the OEshnik again at the SPIEF? As for me, that's an omission. :-)
    Yes. And how are our strategists? Have they cleared them of the soot from the tires yet? The pilots will now have to take turns flying on them.
    1. 0
      23 June 2025 17: 35
      Quote: Alex_Kraus
      Yes. And how are our strategists? Have they cleared them of the soot from the tires yet? The pilots will now have to take turns flying on them.

      There is no harm in dreaming, but you continue to hope for your victory. Yes
  16. +1
    23 June 2025 16: 55
    Serial production of the much-talked-about medium-range missile system Oreshnik is underway in Russia, as announced by the country's President Vladimir Putin during a meeting with graduates of higher military educational institutions.
    The Supreme Commander-in-Chief also noted that in a very short period of time, these weapons have proven themselves very well during combat operations in the SVO zone.
    Right.
    Graduates of higher military educational institutions are obviously specialists in the field of using various types of weapons.
    And how the elite of the Armed Forces - and potentially the leaders of the Armed Forces - must have not just an idea, but a clear understanding of who the Supreme Commander-in-Chief is and what he thinks.
  17. 0
    23 June 2025 17: 02
    The use was EFFECTIVE, its effectiveness without warheads is hard to judge. Some believe that everything underground was destroyed by kinetic energy. The Americans also claim that they destroyed Iranian nuclear facilities, although the photo shows only neat holes in the ground.
    But it is obvious that the Russian leadership (I will designate it so vaguely, it is no longer possible to write specifically on the forum) places great hopes on Oreshnik. Well, let's wait for the second application and its results - God willing, they will be more illustrative!
    1. +2
      23 June 2025 19: 45
      The Americans also claim that they destroyed Iranian nuclear facilities, although the photo only shows neat holes in the ground.

      Any bunker buster weapon will leave neat holes in the ground.
      Even the consequences of using anti-bunker TNW will not be very different
  18. -2
    23 June 2025 18: 13
    The management said, “We have to!”
    And Hazelnut replied, “Yes!”
  19. -2
    23 June 2025 19: 57
    Russia has missiles, planes, etc.
    But their mass production is in a bad way.
  20. -1
    25 June 2025 07: 21
    And the person really believes what he says. IMHO, that's already a diagnosis. How many launches were there in total and what percentage of them were successful? They've probably forgotten about Bulava. It was even better there.