Military Review

West's turn-based strategy

93
I do not believe that the rulers of the whole world went wildly crazy, that presidents and prime ministers fell into insanity. And that for all of them the nuthouse is crying, I also do not believe it. Then why is our civilization ever more surely rolling into a monstrous abyss? Why do Western countries and all their imitators and admirers commit suicide of their own nations? I am sure that in future textbooks historians will call the transfer of basic production facilities to China and other Far Eastern countries as madness and betrayal of national interests (only the question of what languages ​​they will be written in, and which ethnic groups will disappear forever because of the incomprehensible games of their elites).




Our descendants will be surprised at the stupidity, short-sightedness and obvious sabotage of the leadership of many, if not most, countries of the world. Moreover, the course towards deindustrialization (the hypocrites came up with the term postindustrialization) is conducted regardless of cultural or political bias. No matter who is in power - right, left, green, centrists - by and large nothing changes.

Previously, as it was: the workers at the factory collected the car, for which they received a coin, then they went to the hairdresser. For his work, the barber takes money, which he will sometime later, if he works hard and does not be lazy, will allow his car to buy a car from the factory, and his brands or pounds will be returned to the auto-builders. These funds will get or will give the salary to the workers so that they can get a haircut.

Now everything is different: cars have long been assembled in China, the son of a worker in a white shirt and tie is concerned about the dynamics of sales growth from competitors, and his colleague is on the phone reporting off some Malaysian for a broken schedule of component supplies. Both of them have never been on the factory floor, but without them, two “outstanding” specialists, probably no car will come off the assembly line.

The son of a hairdresser works all in the same place as his father. He bought a new chair, sink, scissors, nail files all sorts. True, on credit. And he has a car, a smart model and with leather seats, but also in debt. Does he have to, like his father, save up for five years on a normal car? I went to the bank and did everything in half a day. True, he is completely spoiled by the mood, if he begins to count all of his bank debts and interest on them, as well as interest on interest. Imagine, bought everything, as a consultant advised, updated the equipment, and then the crisis, unfortunately. People are expelled from work, wages and benefits are cut, there is no time for fashionable hairstyles. The consultant, by the way, was deprived of his debts at home.

After changing the structure of the economy, a lot of "extra" people appeared. If earlier the powerful people needed labor, today, when production moved much cheaper, they are not in demand (I wrote about this in the article “We don’t need anyone”). Many professions appeared, which were difficult to imagine a hundred years ago. Tell me, why so many cosmetologists, makeup artists, all sorts of designers, canine hairdressers, consultants for any questions, psychologists? Where to put an army of guards, a division of gym instructors and a legion of marketers? Why did the darkness of the officials divorce, where are the offices so much plankton, and why do so many people play sports professionally? Hundreds and thousands of football, hockey, basketball clubs, incessant competitions between them. And curling! What, there is no place to wash the floors and absolutely nothing to do the cleaners? Previously, there was just a striptease, but now a new kind of sport, dancing on a pole, will soon go to the Olympics instead of wrestlers. We arrived.

Most of these people are engaged in nonsense. It is necessary to take them with something, but for that reason it’s not good to give money - a lot of free time will appear, they will start thinking, smart books to read, Dostoevsky or Remarque, they will think something else.

All this magnificence is paid in debt. This debt, respectively, is constantly growing. Almost all property is under the credit press. Someone was “crushed” strongly, someone was not very, but the tendency is that every year the banking web knits whole countries and peoples more and more. It is clear that this cannot go on forever, and this is clearly seen from the releases. News, and, if you look closely, then from your own window.

When this model of "development" was built, its architects could not be unaware of how this would end, to which collapse would result. Why all this was started, I will try to say later.

Take another aspect of life - demographics. It is interesting, first of all, not the number of inhabitants of different countries of nations, but the TREND. It is such that soon there will be neither Swedes, nor British, nor Germans in Europe, and in the USA the white man will be far from being in the majority. Everyone has heard that in France, the average birth rate among French women is 1.8, and that of Muslim women from this country is 8.1. This is an exaggeration. In fact, an Islamic woman gives birth much less. But the fact that Muhammad is the most common name among newborns in Europe (information provided by Military Observation) is already a fact. And what will happen in 20 years when today's babies go to the army? And for whom, if necessary, will they fight?

Why do you need it? Who benefits? This is a real suicide of nations. The great, and not so great, ancestors of the French, the English, the Germans, the Japanese, and other countries, probably in the casket turned over a hundred times from all this.

Why was propaganda of homosexuality and other perversions started? Is it really not clear that this will not increase the number of their peoples, but on the contrary, they will significantly reduce them. I once wrote (“The positive role of diseases”) that what is harmful becomes immoral in the minds of people is not advisable from the point of view of the health of an individual and the people in particular. So, sexual perversions are harmful for the simple reason that from "all this" children, future workers, peasants, presidents and artists no longer becomes.

Why is the juvenile being introduced, in principle, it is clear: to finally finish off the family as an institution + the redistribution of children as a valuable rare resource. It sounds cynical, but it is. But this resource is renewable. Isn't it easier to stop aggressive LGBT campaigning and help build normal large families?

Why and why the states, this fighter for human values, who promotes democracy throughout the world with fascist methods, smashes his country for dubious military operations? They are watching the Afghan mountains with satellites costing from half a billion dollars, beating with high-precision missiles worth from half a million US rubles on clay huts. The cost of delivery of military equipment, fuel, equipment in remote areas breaks all mental records. Which economy will endure all this? One, not the weakest, 20 could not stand it more than years ago.

Why did they ruin their automotive industry pride - Detroit? Why poison large, albeit sparsely populated, territories with their shale? What, it was impossible to cheat any more financial bubble? Or did the printing press break down, and the Saudis do not buy diesel for anything?

And why Ukraine started the same rigmarole with shale gas? Buying fuel for molecules in Hungary and other transit countries? Russia offers cheap gas without environmental risks and a gigantic market, and Yanukovych rests on the impression that he is being slaughtered. What did they sing and whisper in the West?

Obviously, shale gas - Cossack shale. It will not solve the problem of cheap energy, besides having such partners as Shell and Chevron and a production sharing agreement to boot.

And to add problems shale gas can easily. In the first place, of course, environmental problems. Serious problems are very likely, which is typical both in the Russophile east and in the Russophobian west due to “shale chemistry”. This can bring together two subethnos and lead to the understanding that it is simpler, more convenient and cheaper to produce gas together with Russia somewhere in Siberia, like several decades ago. For me, this is a very bad, almost the worst version of integration. Integration due to a common misfortune, but, unfortunately, another unifying force does not affect us.

Let's go back to the stubbornness of Ukraine. Its leaders are not fools at all (otherwise people would have been smarter in their place). They, apparently, were told, they say, the partner from the east will soon change, transform, disappear from the world map, etc. You will be patient there a little, and morally (no, no, only morally, not financially) we are with you. Or our Russian will come to the klyat Russians, and only then everything will change, transform, disappear from the world map, etc.

President of Uzbekistan impudently "sent" Russia. Does he not understand that she is much closer than America? Or is it counting on continental drift? Maybe he was discovered some secrets and asked to make a choice with whom you will be on one side of the barricades. Maybe relatives from Israel persuaded? It’s just so sharp turns. But old foxes don’t make politics; you don’t like neckties.

I used to play a turn-based strategy in a fifth or fourth civilization. I will not bore you with the rules and principles of the game, I will only say that for a military victory it was necessary to seize the lands and cities of all competitors. To achieve this goal, at some point it was necessary to completely neglect the interests of its citizens, to “score” on health care, education, demography, culture, perhaps, to allow hunger and an increase in urban discontent. To focus on military development, and industrial enterprises, roads, dams, stations, agriculture - all side by side. A disproportionate amount of attention is given to military technology, providing an advantage in technology, and everything else is secondary, since The game will end with a victory over the last enemy.

The economy immediately goes into a minus, and the infrastructure very quickly “bends” and you have two choices: either seize the rich cities of a rival, or self-destruct your military units, reducing costs (then there can be no question of seizing new lands).

So you pull up your troops to a new victim, maybe you pretend that you bring them out from somewhere (in fact, you pull them up to the victim), and he, as a blunderer, as if nothing had happened, is building new cities, drawing pipelines and building A nuclear power plant, and probably surprised by the suicidal policies of a competitor. He does not know that all of his lands are divided, and when the cities are captured, the enemy will receive enough gold to recoup his military expenses and also remain to destroy the last competitors.

Doesn't this remind you of anything? Let's complicate the game by a hundred orders of magnitude, introduce new factors and get a modern reality. States, their allies and outspoken vassals plan to finish the "game" as quickly as possible, otherwise the "cost of servicing military units" and the creation of new units will finally destroy their economy, which is fraught with the restoration of the sovereignty of numerous satellites, as well as complete stupor, stagnation and, possibly, collapse the aggressor.

Americans went for broke. I repeat, they need to finish this game very, very quickly, otherwise, at a minimum, the loss of leadership and the backlog of competitors, which will be impossible to catch up. Then, after their hypothetical victory (and at the same time losing the rest of the world), they will arrange a new game, by their own rules, and only trump aces will be in their hands. All that indecency, the blooming in full bloom in the West and allowing us its metastases is the preparation of an ugly future prepared for all of us. All the vile and base, despised at another time will become the norm and the absolute truth. Everything will decide for us - from the place of our work of leisure to the duration of our life and the fate of our children. This is ordinary fascism, where instead of concentration camps and barbed wire we will be watched by a technogenic big brother.

Look, the big exercises went one after the other, we are intensively “pumping military units”, we are trying to quickly put into operation new equipment. I went to the process of returning to the system great "pumped", but with a fool or with the intent of the dismissed specialists.

And let's look at the army (army) of the likely enemy. "Units" is full, technically they are great "pumped." But they fought against the armies of the last era (in America in the course of such weapon there were "moves" 50 back), and they fought, frankly, so-so. Armed with all sorts of old, more motivated opponents (for their land, after all they fought) gave battle to the adversaries, and the NATO won solely thanks to the overwhelming technical equipment. According to the terms of the “game”, their “units”, unlike ours, are almost impossible to “pump” according to such important characteristics as “honor”, ​​“valor”, “readiness for self-sacrifice”, “courage”. In the case of significant losses for them (less than 1% (!)) In personnel, Mass hysteria, unrest and riots, flight from a busy country and possible change of power begin in the USA. Therefore, they are forced to "train on cats", i.e. obviously weaker opponents so that coffins do not go home.

A prerequisite for their victory over us is the use of special "units - spies", which will undermine the morale, sow doubts and panic. Their goals and objectives are clear, methods and means - in addition to the usual spywares, the creation of various noisy gatherings aimed at discrediting the authorities primarily in the eyes of their own people, in order to deprive them of their support at the “X” hour. It is very good that at the top it is well understood and they do not sit with folded arms.

In this situation, time is working for us. All these weapons, these military bases, aircraft carriers and fighters, and tamogavki are very expensive to maintain. They should work, “beat off costs”, i.e. seize countries and their resources, otherwise very soon they will turn into useless trash. And we, without losing vigilance, wait.
Author:
93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. shinobi
    shinobi April 11 2013 08: 49 New
    26
    The US military doctrine, by default, contains a criterion for personnel losses determining the ability to conduct hostilities. 10% of those participating in the operation. If losses are expected to be higher, then America simply will not start a war.
    1. ughhh
      ughhh April 11 2013 12: 49 New
      12
      The conversation in the article is about the third world war, and it can easily grow into a nuclear one, and after a nuclear war it’s good if 10% of the world's population remains.
      There is a lot of winding up in the article, of course, the feeling that the author has replayed in Civilization and is divorced from reality. But all the same, plus, well written.
      1. FC SKIF
        April 11 2013 12: 53 New
        +4
        I think there are no fools and no one needs a full-scale nuclear war and it will not be allowed. Unless skynet gets to the Pentagon servers.
        1. ughhh
          ughhh April 11 2013 13: 28 New
          -13
          There is still the possibility that our strategic nuclear forces are fiction. Residues not sawn under Yeltsin are under the complete control of the Americans. Well, people in uniform assured me so.
          1. rolik
            rolik April 11 2013 15: 04 New
            16
            Quote: ughhh
            . Well, people in uniform assured me so.

            I suppose go, there were guys in NATO camouflage))))
          2. karbofos
            karbofos April 11 2013 15: 55 New
            11
            accidentally not in the form of nurses wassat
          3. Ghenxnumx
            Ghenxnumx April 11 2013 18: 06 New
            +2
            Quote: ughhh
            There is still the possibility that our strategic nuclear forces are fiction. Residues not sawn under Yeltsin are under the complete control of the Americans. Well, people in uniform assured me so.

            And I assure laughing I also tell you that behind the hatch, except for the 20 liter canister, there is nothing, and the key switch hangs on the gate in the country house, and no current flows to the grid, and the hares on it burn with fear from the placebo effect good
            1. ughhh
              ughhh April 11 2013 22: 09 New
              +2
              I would not want to believe, of course) but it’s so, trembling on a bench ...
          4. pinachet
            pinachet April 11 2013 21: 57 New
            +3
            not a fact .., one "uncle" told me that everything is the other way around. They took money from the amers, but they sawed not everything and not everywhere. And what should have been destroyed is still worth it.
            1. nakaz
              nakaz April 11 2013 23: 28 New
              +3
              My brother told me that in the 90s they were selling old rocket cases to some left-wing foreigners, passing them off as military ones. They paid a little but things went. Moreover, it was the old ancient R-16 without any filling whatsoever)) Then when they were transferred to another part, the former colleagues told that those merchants came for a very long time and asked where the previous staff could be found.
          5. T-130
            T-130 April 17 2013 17: 59 New
            0
            It is doubtful, in that case, when solving many international issues, Russia would not even be asked. And then the attitude towards Russia now and under Yeltsin is completely different, one feels that they are afraid!
        2. 1lexsander
          1lexsander April 22 2013 20: 41 New
          0
          An excellent article also surprises me with the logic, in particular, of the Ukrainian authorities to sell the berths in the Odessa port and then complain that it is unprofitable and tell the population that we are completely unnecessary and should be carried to hell with dogs. And in its place to build moorings for yachts. Although ports are important in any strategy. But here, as you rightly noted, logic over logic is easier to sell everything. Breaking does not build. And when there’s nothing to sell, we will declare war on Russia and quietly surrender, you look and take us the non-travelers back. And there, 70-100 years will pass, we will settle in, settle down and think again whether to become independent and independent again. Zhirok then postponed, the population living standard has grown up and it’s time to eat. Amerorods are just waiting where something is wrong. Europe, however, has gotten tired of it, but it is still swaggering and shouting at GDP about funds or about human rights. And then by chance he will suggest, but would you like to join our wild dance called the EU Vladimir Vladimirovich, otherwise the money in our kingdom ends and Cyprus is the first sign and Russia is waiting and doing the right thing.
      2. Dilshat
        Dilshat April 12 2013 00: 48 New
        +5
        Yes, everything is written correctly. I have been waiting for such an article for a long time. He did not replay. The fifth column is a very sore point for Russia. Supercomputers all over the USA every day calculate the probable outcome of the global conflict.
      3. Su24
        Su24 April 13 2013 19: 07 New
        0
        Look, major exercises went one after another, we are intensely “pumping military units”


        in America, such weapons were “moves” 50 back


        the feeling that the author has replayed in Civilization


        That's it, I also wanted to say it!))
    2. T-130
      T-130 April 17 2013 17: 54 New
      0
      When the question is about the attempt on the dollar as a world currency, I’m afraid of them and 50% of the losses will not confuse!
  2. FC SKIF
    April 11 2013 08: 52 New
    15
    American sequestration: The Pentagon and the State Department cringe - this is the name of another article today. I won’t believe that they self-destruct just like that. I think they can decide on some kind of adventure. Amer has little time for thought; the risk of mistakes increases.
    1. Atlon
      Atlon April 11 2013 10: 06 New
      +9
      Again disturbing and clever article. Yesterday was the “Black Label for All” http://topwar.ru/26623-chernaya-metka-vsem.html#comment-id-1065743
      I think by the fall (traditionally) there will be some kind of denouement, and probably a terrible denouement ... Well, they don’t let me live quietly! Bastards ... am
      1. Tektor
        Tektor April 11 2013 14: 41 New
        +1
        The only way to survive is to be strong, in an amicable way - arrogant and not give any doubt that we can use this force. The game will reach its climax (bifurcation point): we will be offered to "surrender", motivated by some fucking irresistible quasi-force and accompanying muck from the "repertoire" of a blackmailer terrorist. And you will need to have iron eggs to bend your line ...
      2. rolik
        rolik April 11 2013 15: 09 New
        +7
        Quote: Atlon
        . Well, they don’t give you peace! Bastards ...

        For a more relaxed life, it would be nice to get together at least 3 representatives (you know who I mean) of the BRICS countries. To gather, like drinking a tea without ties, and conclude a pact on military and economic assistance. In the event of an attack on one of these countries by a third force, subjected to aggression, the country will be provided with full military support and mate. help. China and India must be well aware if they destroy it - they will be next. The enemy must be fought as he fights against others. Heap all over.
        1. Raven1972
          Raven1972 April 11 2013 20: 56 New
          +2
          Good idea, like Steel Pact ... Approve with both hands good hi
  3. Vanek
    Vanek April 11 2013 08: 52 New
    +3
    "Crazy" author.

    good
    1. FC SKIF
      April 11 2013 08: 55 New
      +2
      Where is madness?
      1. Cartoon
        Cartoon April 11 2013 10: 35 New
        +6
        Our whole life is a game? Only the cunning is flourishing, not the strongest. As in the Chinese proverb: while the tigers fight, the smart monkey sits on the tree. There is still no game where you could not fight, but quietly row money to the envy of competitors. Anybody will come by a dull computer AI and try to conquer your peaceful country. It is written in the program code so. Otherwise, the player would be bored. If a player is caught advanced and knows how to play, he himself goes to war against his neighbors. And what else to do, it's more interesting, the whole game calls for this. I would like epic battles and confrontations for life and death. And "sitting in a tree" quickly gets boring. But now we have defeated everyone, and our valiant warriors are waving their hands in programmed joy. We close the game and go to the news sites. And here no one is fighting in the open! Everyone tries to behave like those smart monkeys, and only occasionally throw bananas at each other. And if a tiger appears below, in the shade of the trees, then everyone immediately looks with interest what he will do. Yes, he is stronger, he is faster, he is terrible in his appearance. He growls and throws himself. But he just can't get the monkeys. And as a result, he dies of hunger ...
      2. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg April 11 2013 10: 48 New
        +2
        Quote: FC Skiff
        Where is madness?


        And where the game ends.

        The core of nuclear deterrence is that no one will survive after an exchange of attacks. Ie just do no one. This can be won in the strategy, just read that the next session ended with the user's victory over the program. In real life, there is no one and nowhere to read about the end of the session.

        Plus set for the fact that a lot of letters. I respect the ability to express my opinion.
      3. Tartary
        Tartary April 11 2013 12: 43 New
        +4
        Quote: FC Skif
        Where is madness?


        Yes, just joked, Ivan ... What is so right?
        The article is good; reflections are stated in simple words intelligibly.
        Thank...
        Good Luck!
        1. Tartary
          Tartary April 11 2013 12: 55 New
          +8
          But that smiled me a lot -
          Hundreds and thousands of football, hockey, basketball clubs, ongoing competitions between them.
          And curling! What, nowhere to wash the floors and absolutely nothing to do the cleaners?
          It used to be just a striptease, but now the sport is new, they are dancing on a pole, soon they will go to the Olympics instead of wrestlers. Arrived.
      4. GELEZNII_KAPUT
        GELEZNII_KAPUT April 11 2013 15: 12 New
        0
        In quotation marks "madness"! wink
  4. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets April 11 2013 09: 05 New
    +7
    Why plunge their country into the abyss, why wreak havoc, why they withdraw money and production, why ... There are many questions, the answer is simple: the time for national elites ends, the time for supranational elites begins. The interests of Americans, Russians, French or Berbers are in the new drum formation; they have different interests. America is interested in these elites, because at the moment it can protect their money, the power of the states will drop, the elites will start supporting China, nor China, so Brazil, they do not care, they are cosmopolitan, patriotism is alien to them.
    1. Papakiko
      Papakiko April 11 2013 10: 15 New
      +7
      Quote: Vladimirets
      the power of the states will fall, the elites will begin to support China, nor China, so Brazil, they nevermind, they are cosmopolitan, patriotism is alien to them.

      cosmopolitan, patriotism is alien to them
      Eugene, do you believe in this or are you trying to "bite" us?
      Cosmopolitan, a citizen of the world, (a person of space - the universe) - the ideology of “world citizenship”, which puts the interests of mankind above the interests of a particular nation or state and considers the inhabitants of the Earth regardless of geographical citizenship any kind of affiliation.
      A supporter of the idea of ​​world citizenship, one who considers the whole world to be his own country, puts universal human interests and values ​​above the interests of a single nation or a separate state ◆ Since the end of the XNUMXth and throughout the XNUMXth century, “cosmopolitans” have been freed from traditional religious ties, imbued with a sense of universality, which at that time included hermeticism.
      Biological; representative of an animal or plant species distributed throughout the Earth ◆ Cosmopolitan animals include, for example, rotifers, tardigrades, freshwater crustaceans, cereals and asteraceae among plants.
      To whom will cosmopolitans attribute themselves?

      All cosmopolitanism is sharpened solely in the ability to freely move a human individual across the globe and, accordingly, the free movement of capital of this individual without taxes and social costs in the projects of this individual.

      For example; "little man" in the 90s "snatched" several factories. Now he lives in the Bahamas-Canary Islands and other "palm" places. Has several real estate citizenships in different parts of the world. He receives his income from these "small factories". "Shchemit" in the salary of ROBOVtniks and cuts costs on all consumables and spare parts. Foaming at his mouth, he proves that he pays a mega-salary to "employees" from the master's shoulder and it is more profitable for him to build new factories in China than to keep "parasites" here, and he does the latter exclusively out of "philanthropy".

      That is why we call all these multi-colored xmopolitans "liberals".
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets April 11 2013 11: 14 New
        +2
        What in my comment contradicts the concept of cosmopolitanism and the example given to you? I really believe that America is convenient as a club for transnational financial institutions. Is any outspoken financial interest sticking out of any state action, or do you think that after the capture of Iraq all Americans divided dividends among themselves? Or do corporations that take production abroad think about how the American worker will feed his children? Of course not, they think about their money and nothing more.
        1. Papakiko
          Papakiko April 11 2013 13: 13 New
          0
          Quote: Vladimirets
          What will the American worker feed his children? Of course not, they think about their money and nothing more.

          They do not think for each individual worker, this is a fact.
          But they cannot but take into account these masses of people-consumers of goods and services.
          Quote: Vladimirets
          about your money and nothing more.

          This is our "Aligophrenia" who live like this. And they have "patriotism" (an unlimited amount of $ exclusively "theirs" are given) in a square erected.
          I tell you that cosmopolism is different here and there.
          This is like democracy, with us and with us.
          1. Vladimirets
            Vladimirets April 11 2013 14: 28 New
            +3
            Quote: Papakiko
            They do not think for each individual worker, this is a fact.
            But they cannot but take into account these masses of people-consumers of goods and services.

            What does "take into account" mean? The peasant also takes into account the interests of his sheep, because they bring him money, but if, suddenly, the prices for feed rise, he will cut them, because it is more profitable, regardless of their beauty and animal rights.
            Quote: Papakiko
            This is our "Aligophrenia" who live like this. And they have "patriotism" (an unlimited amount of $ exclusively "theirs" are given) in a square erected.

            Eeeeee, no. They are given everywhere to theirs, that they, that with us, nobody is going to share with anyone from the street and this is not patriotism, but pure business, power (and money is still power, whatever one may say) is given to those who In the near and long term, there will be no danger to those who play according to the established rules.
            Quote: Papakiko
            I tell you that cosmopolism is different here and there.
            This is like democracy, with us and with us.

            Cosmopolitanism, like democracy, cannot be different. This is the same as saying that they and we have a blue color different.
            1. Papakiko
              Papakiko April 12 2013 21: 07 New
              0
              Quote: Vladimirets
              Cosmopolitanism, like democracy, cannot be different. This is the same as saying that they and we have a blue color different.

              Eugene.
              I’m talking to you about this and I’m telling you, well, otherwise it’s a "policy of double standards."
              Quote: Vladimirets
              but if, suddenly, feed prices rise, then he will cut them

              Why cut it? belay
              You can simply raise prices for your outgoing product in a similar way.
              Quote: Vladimirets
              regardless of their beauty and animal rights.

              It just smiled laughing
  5. VadimSt
    VadimSt April 11 2013 09: 19 New
    +2
    Let's get back to the stubbornness of Ukraine. Its leaders are not fools at all (otherwise people would have been smarter in their place).

    So we sat, both literally and figuratively - what's the point?
  6. erased
    erased April 11 2013 09: 32 New
    15
    Until the states receive a guarantee that Russia will not be able to deliver a powerful nuclear strike, they will not climb. But they will prepare. So you need to build your potential and be prepared. And of course, to work beyond the hill - to pit, tore apart, to quarrel everyone. Let them get bogged down in their shit. There will be time to increase their strength.
  7. Sirocco
    Sirocco April 11 2013 09: 50 New
    +9
    Bravo SKIF. The article is not in the eyebrow, but in the eye. On a neighboring branch, I commented on this situation with the United States. This is a wounded boar, who pretended to be dead, in order to inflict a mortal blow to the hunter. BUT, the fact that he is alive is betrayed by the ears and scruff of the beast, standing on end. Be careful. And it's time for our authorities to stop flirting with the EU and the USA. Dear GDP may be enough to engage in self-flagellation. soldier
  8. Backfire
    Backfire April 11 2013 09: 56 New
    24
    Thanks to which all wars are waged - someone pays for it.
    Who exactly?
    Pick up any US dollar bill. And what do we read there? BANKNOTE OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE! This is a private shop whose owners are unknown.
    “American” dollars have nothing to do with America for 100 years. This is the money of the world financial elite. And for them the world has long been one. Their goal is a "new world order".

    By the way, for a change, take any Russian bill. What is written there? Right - Bank of Russia ticket. Take an interest in what relation this bank has to Russia.

    For example, the red star was the symbol of the Red Army - this is the symbol of the Rothschilds house.
    The "Red Project" which we know as the USSR is a project that has temporarily gone out of control.
    At first, Lenin began to cunning with sponsors, and Stalin generally seemed to play his game.

    So why exactly is the US army waging so many wars across the earth? Just in the modern system of division of labor, America is assigned the role of military force.

    For world elites there is no fatherland.
    For example, last year, the Rothschilds began moving the HSBC operating base from London to Hong Kong. Im violet england. Or you can ask - what objects are under the throne of the British monarchs (literally lie!)

    By the way, the consumer society that we have and whose symbol in the world are the USA is not the worst option for us! Thanks to this, there is not a large number of wars yet - mass shooting of consumers will reduce profits.
    But if / or when this model is covered with a copper basin, then the world elites can return to their centuries-old dream - HAMSTERS SHOULD WORK FOR EAT.

    So why do they allegedly "cut the branch on which they themselves sit, transferring production to other countries, etc.?"
    Yes, they are in a drum if one country rises, and the other begins to languish. And finance is just a tool for them. The main thing for them is to maintain control.
    Ideally, make sure that they can never lose him, even theoretically. For example, by introducing universal chipping of hamsters.

    The world is "spinning" for the sake of two, three hundred families. So there really is a strategy, but not for the "West" or "East", but for those who rule us, possibly since the time of the Egyptian priests.
    1. Silhouette
      Silhouette April 11 2013 10: 12 New
      +2
      Quote: Backfire
      the red star is the symbol of the Rothschild house


      Did Rothschild tell you this? laughing
    2. Kubatai
      Kubatai April 11 2013 10: 27 New
      +8
      I don’t know about the Red Star project, but many had “ears” sticking out there ...
      I fully support the rest.
      1. Backfire
        Backfire April 11 2013 11: 02 New
        10
        In the subject

        And "Red Proket" (not a red star) was probably one of the first attempts to create what the current European Union has become. Hitler is attempt number two.
        1. Heccrbq
          Heccrbq April 11 2013 13: 47 New
          +7
          We are now in the role of these rams, the dog is the guarantor of the constitution, and the shepherds are the heads of transports.
          1. I think so
            I think so April 11 2013 19: 14 New
            +5
            As long as I remember:
            The five-pointed star appears in the torr to mean "OUR POWER OVER THEM."
            The SIX-POINTED star means "OUR POWER OVER US".
            Color is not indicated there. I think the color was determined during the 17th revolution by local Jews such as Trotsky, Zinoviev, etc.
            I very much agree that the revolution of the 17th was under the TOTAL control of the Jewish diaspora and REALLY got out of control after the seizure of power by Stalin (which the same supposedly has Jewish roots). Hitler was ORGANIZED as a project aimed at destroying the "Red project out of control", but also got out of control by ATTACKING FRANCE.
            Now the world elite DOES NOT KNOW in what way to HOLD their influence. This is the DANGER for all of us. They can go on a colossal extermination of the population either by nuclear war or by an epidemic. My impression is that both are together. The elite itself will sit out in its bunkers for about five seven years and, having left, will organize the structure of the ENTIRE remaining society in its own way.
  9. zennon
    zennon April 11 2013 09: 59 New
    +3
    As for the transfer of production capacities to SEA, everything is just nothing personal, only business. The salary fund in Europe is up to 40% of the cost of the finished product, and only 5% in the rank. Yes, in the end everything will end badly, but you need to chop the cabbage now .A much more terrible problem is the replacement of the native population with Gaster. Politicians do not even imagine the terrible and already imminent consequences of their idiocy. This applies in full ...
  10. JonnyT
    JonnyT April 11 2013 10: 03 New
    +9
    The author "looks at the root"
    The only thing that scares me is "traitor spies" and corruption! Unfortunately, the middle class in our country is not very numerous, and this is the foundation of any statehood! The greater the difference between rich and poor, the easier it is to sow discord between us. Authorities, support your population, at least in the dwelling farm. Young people have nowhere to live, nowhere to raise children! Hence the problems with demographics! And it turns out that in order to solve the housing issue, you need to wait until one of the family members dies! This is blasphemy!
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets April 11 2013 10: 14 New
      +5
      Quote: JonnyT
      Unfortunately, the middle class in our country is not very numerous, and this is the foundation of any statehood!

      The middle class, in its global sense, exists only in Moscow and St. Petersburg, for the rest of Russia, people who have such benefits belong to the rich, the stratification is huge even by region.
    2. Atlon
      Atlon April 11 2013 12: 05 New
      11
      Quote: JonnyT
      Unfortunately, the middle class in our country is not very numerous, and this is the foundation of any statehood!

      This is one of the modern myths ... It is believed that the middle class has something to lose, and therefore it is the guarantor of stability. However, the middle class that exists in the world today has completely discredited its name. Think of Russia and its middle class "kulaks". They had something to lose, that's why the struggle was so cruel. And take the current "middle class". They also have something to lose, but ... They live not on their earnings, but on debt! In the United States, at the height of the crisis, the middle class was simply thrown into the street! Because living in debt, you should remember that your well-being belongs to your creditors. If desired, the entire modern middle class can be "dispersed" through the slums in a week! The same Cypriot robbery confirms this.
      1. JonnyT
        JonnyT April 11 2013 12: 51 New
        0
        Ah loans. All this is fantastic that they give stability and freedom! Therefore, borrowers must not be taken seriously, they are too dependent on the economy, or rather on the will of the oligarchy!
        In my understanding, average ones are those families with their own housing and family income of about 50-60 tr. Such a family will always support the government! But the trouble is, with a large number of such families in power, fewer opportunities are enriched in person and create whatever they want and profitable. A situation arises when people control power, and not vice versa! In the sense, power works in the interests of the common people! But this cannot be allowed in any way. Once again I repeat, at the top they still dream of feudal times and serfdom
        1. Atlon
          Atlon April 11 2013 13: 35 New
          +7
          Quote: JonnyT
          In my understanding, average ones are those families with their own housing and a household income of about 50-60 tr. Such a family will always support the government!

          Again not true ...
          The middle class is not measured by money! And opportunities. The middle class in pre-revolutionary Russia, and in the world, is the rural population. Farmers, peasants. Non-drinkers, hard workers, with LARGE families, and as a result, there are enough working hands in family "corporations" to cultivate and develop the land available in OWNERSHIP. Everything else, from the evil one. For a person, in order to survive, needs first of all food! And the main principle of food safety is: to produce, process and save YOURSELF! This is the middle class. For in the event of a "nuclear war", a large, friendly, hardworking family of several generations will survive on their own land, and having apartments, cars and income in the form of cut paper will simply die of hunger.
          1. JonnyT
            JonnyT April 11 2013 13: 57 New
            0
            Well, you are so pessimistic ...... In the event of a nuclear war, it is certainly better to have the means of food production. I still think that in our country there are more normal sane people, and not zombie consumers.
            The times of agrarian Russia have sunk into oblivion. Now the village is in a difficult situation. Taxes such that agriculture is profitably engaged only on a large scale. And they will not let private traders with their environmentally friendly products onto the market. Money is what nowadays just gives opportunities. Unfortunately, the capitalist system dictates its own conditions of survival ...... But in general, if the family is normal, friendly, then all the hardships on its shoulder can exist!
            1. Atlon
              Atlon April 11 2013 14: 33 New
              +7
              Quote: JonnyT
              The times of agrarian Russia have sunk into oblivion.

              This is you in vain ... wink

              Quote: JonnyT
              Now the village is in a difficult situation

              Not really ... Two years ago I bought a house in the village, with the desire to leave for permanent residence from the city. So, you are not in the subject ... Much has changed. And the number of visitors from cities to the earth, with a desire to work, is simply amazing!

              Quote: JonnyT
              Taxes such that agriculture is profitably engaged only on a large scale.

              You are again off topic ... if we talk about the middle class, as I described it, then it will probably be surprising to you ... According to the law, I (as the owner of the land of a rural settlement) and my family have the right to engage in production, processing and marketing agricultural products WITHOUT TAXATION, WITHOUT REGISTRATION, and WITHOUT DECLARATION OF INCOME. This right is given to me by the CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP on the LAND OF RURAL SETTLEMENTS.

              Quote: JonnyT
              And they will not let private traders with their environmentally friendly products onto the market.

              You are again off topic, or judge in Moscow. In addition, the private owner is not very much in need of a market ... Sales come either directly from the farm, or by visiting pre-orders. Bypassing the market and intermediaries.

              Quote: JonnyT
              Money is what nowadays just gives opportunities.

              Money is just a tool, and, by itself, it does not give any opportunities. In a "nuclear war", they just light the stove (whoever has it). In besieged Leningrad, a handful of potato peelings were exchanged for family jewels ...
        2. Alexey Prikazchikov
          Alexey Prikazchikov April 11 2013 13: 47 New
          0
          50-60 thousand for seven is not enough. For two, maybe norms, but if there are children, and if children with health do not have gut, then what?
        3. fghjvbn13
          fghjvbn13 April 13 2013 13: 53 New
          0
          ... what dreams? For a long time already serfs!
  11. Nesvet Nezar
    Nesvet Nezar April 11 2013 10: 14 New
    11
    Yes, it's all about us. In each of us. Consciousness to the West. Car, apartment, free love. We think that this is freedom. And no one needs freedom. Real freedom is when you are alone. And we need a society, like-minded people. Even like-minded people are no longer freedom. So we must admit that the real truth is recorded by people in the holy books of all religions. This summary is called the commandment. Believers, atheists and agnostics, this information allows you to create communities and states that provide opportunities for the realization of the individual. And the faster the states, religions and peoples fall into decline, the faster they stop thinking about their reproduction. In general, if there is no love between a man and a woman, fixed by marriage, a family social. Responsibility - there is no continuation of the state, religion, people.
    But in Russia, the homeland, home, wife, children, work have always been valuable. In the hard times of the twentieth century, it became lazy for us to serve these values. It's easier to be independent. This independence gave us "gifts". I hope we can draw conclusions. And we will solve our problems ourselves as men.
    1. Curculum
      Curculum April 12 2013 00: 28 New
      +2
      Quote: Nesvet Nezarya
      Yes, it's all about us. In each of us. Consciousness to the West. Car, apartment, free love. We think that this is freedom.

      + absolutely agree!
      All living things on Earth have a clear development program: bees know how to build hives; ants know how to build an ant hill; beavers know how to build their dams. And they do not need to be taught this. And all this knowledge is harmoniously integrated into ecology. AND ONLY A PERSON DOESN’T KNOW HOW TO LIVE, ON WHICH LANGUAGE TO SPEAK, AND WHICH SOCIETY FORMATION TO BUILD. The part of the brain where these rules are genetically recorded was not consciously introduced by the “gods” to us - so that a person would not leave submission. And so - an empty flash drive: not filled - a monkey, filled - a good slave.
      What gives this? This gives an understanding of what we should do. The whole culture surrounding us becomes clear. The only and real thing that we have is the instincts of the monkey, on which you can rely.
      ALL “EUROPEAN VALUES” RELY ON MONKEY'S INSTINCT: 100 sausage varieties - food instinct; sexual revolution, expressed in the fact that you can fuck everywhere and with anyone - the instinct of sex; competition and survival - the instinct of ambition, power, dominance (in a word - the instinct of show-offs).
      Question: why did the scoop peck at the “European values” of the monkey? Because we still accidentally “fell into” instinct with such a quality as “craving for brilliant”. Like a raven - they like to collect all kinds of sparkles. So - IF THE MONKEY'S EUROPEAN INSTINCTS TO MAKE BEAUTIFUL, THEN THE INSTINCT WILL BRIGHTEN WORK! Who is parasitic on this? Advertising, of course, shop windows, etc. Go to the kiosk, look at the pictures: THERE ALL INSTINCTS ARE MADE BEAUTIFUL. And the monkeys (i.e. you and I) peck at it. Take any female magazine, open it: it is all - it’s parasitism on female dominance, expressed in the instinct to like males and envy the neighboring females. That’s all, that’s so simple.
      So, we are real people with disabilities. We are monkeys that differ from tailed monkeys only in that their instincts are made "beautiful." Any glamorous party is a monkey who does the same as here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82GUjPConiE&feature=related, only this is all masked by an alluvial culture from an empty flash drive. That is our whole essence.
      1. Curculum
        Curculum April 12 2013 00: 31 New
        +4
        Is there a way out? I think - there is, as a way out, a disabled person who has no legs, but has prostheses: we must value our stroller as the most precious. And what is our "stroller"? This is our EXTERNAL (unfortunately) memory - books, films, films, etc. And we must understand that AT ANY TIME WE CAN LOSS YOUR DISABLED STROLLER (external memory, culture) LOSE. And we will again become monkeys. True, without tails. And this is not a joke at all.
        And what kind of culture can there be if we take this path?
        Instead of the elections, who is the coolest and who will promise the most show-offs, check in practice each candidate for the quality of management: first, let him command in the village, then in the town, then in the region, then ... And so before the government is run.
        Instead of extended sex without caresses and the exchange of energies - an ocean of tenderness and sincerity with physiological and emotional satisfaction.
        Instead of gluttony from 100 varieties of sausage - clean and ascetic food without a drop of GMOs, dyes, stabilizers, all that shit that parasitizes on the instinct of sparkles in the form of shiny display cases, bright labels for two-legged ravens.
        Instead of ambition, show-offs and success - the painstaking work of science aimed at improving technology, because ONLY IN THIS WAY, IT IS POSSIBLE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM TO MAKE MATERIAL SECURITY FOR ALL.
        No PR, no ads, no competition. Only the SEARCH DIALOGUE instead of the monkey argument “the smartest”, “the debate of the presidential candidates” (roosters), “the last dead and funny hero”, etc. in the same monkey spirit.
        There are only 2 types of societies. There is a society where there are some frozen technologies and an animal distribution hierarchy. This is the so-called. "static society", which can live in such a pool of inferno for thousands of years. It is a society of thieves at the top of the distribution and human trash pulling the strap.
        And there is a "dynamic society" developing, which learns the world and uses its laws for its development - a society of wizards (scientists, inspiring cultural figures) and rulers - honest distributors of what they managed to understand and discover.
        It is clear that a "static society" is a herd of monkeys that will forever jump on trees, and the leader of the flock will always have the most bananas and the most prominent female. And it is also clear that a "dynamic society" will explore space, have eternal youth and 100% healthy children, and will have what the best and most ponty baboon in the flock never dreamed of ...
        We have this empty flash drive! This gives us the opportunity, albeit with difficulty, but to take a different path. Yes, we can do it, and we once followed such a path! It is possible.
        Maybe we're still not really animals? Maybe we have enough mind (if we have one) to turn into a different future?
        1. fghjvbn13
          fghjvbn13 April 13 2013 14: 08 New
          0
          ... just enjoyed reading it!
  12. Trapperxnumx
    Trapperxnumx April 11 2013 10: 17 New
    +1
    Sounds like the truth. Very similar)))
  13. tungus
    tungus April 11 2013 10: 20 New
    +1
    I think it's a little more complicated. If we accept the hypothesis that the United States is focusing on the military seizure of the world as true, then we get a number of "inexplicable" actions. First, why are Americans destroying countries instead of colonizing them? In all countries where America brought democracy, there are civil wars. The population is at war with each other. The infrastructure is collapsing. No profit. And the second thing. Why are Americans spreading their liberal values ​​around the world? Values ​​leading to the degeneration of humanity. Moreover, this degeneration affects the Americans themselves.
    It seems to me that the goal is not to capture the world, but to reduce the population of planet Earth.
    1. FC SKIF
      April 11 2013 10: 47 New
      +3
      And who should colonize these territories? Colonizing is a responsibility. Why. And let the locals fight among themselves - the winner will still give everything for green pieces of paper.
    2. Atlon
      Atlon April 11 2013 12: 15 New
      +4
      Quote: tungus
      It seems to me that the goal is not to capture the world, but to reduce the population of planet Earth.

      That's right !!!

      "After the end of the current crisis, there should be no more than 2 billion people on planet Earth ..." (David Rockefeller)
      1. FC SKIF
        April 11 2013 12: 31 New
        0
        We bet that he sees himself among them.
    3. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker April 11 2013 18: 34 New
      +5
      Quote: tungus
      First, why are Americans destroying countries instead of colonizing them?

      Ordinary "chaos theory" ..
      Or the project of "regressor-progressor" according to V. Lukyanenko: to reduce all opponents (and at the same time allies) to a bestial state with GOOD INTENTIONS for those. And then give out glass beads for every right step towards COMMON GOOD.
      hi
  14. SPACE
    SPACE April 11 2013 10: 38 New
    +7
    The world that exists today with the filing of the West has become capitalistic, its existence and development directly depends on only two factors of profit and constant growth. And the more growth and profit, the better, the absence of profit or growth is a murder for any capital. And this system involves in its orbit people, enterprises and states who are beginning to compete among themselves for profit and growth. Competition in business is also a war, not for life ... Profit and growth depend on four main factors: 1. Raw materials. 2. Finance. 3. Production forces. 4. Sales market.
    Raw materials are becoming smaller, but it is becoming more and more difficult to mine, not all of them have it, rising prices.
    Finance is the affiliation of a group of special people who are now trying to rule and control the world through the money system they created.
    Everyone can have productive forces; education, finance are required.
    Market, the most prerequisite for the existence of the system. Free market access.
    The conclusion is, who will control more than these areas will win profit and growth.
    What is going on today? Capitalism suddenly became unviable; Lenin and Marx spoke about this a long time ago. Capitalism is like flying a paraglider without a motor, sooner or later, but you have to go down to earth. The system cannot grow forever, this is its biggest contradiction. Such a system does not have self-regulation; it will be spread and destroy itself. Free competition, at the initial stage (depending on which side is considered by the business or the buyer), leads to continuous optimization of production and marketing, which ultimately leads to a decrease in the cost of production, which is good for the buyer, but bad for capital. It also leads to the automation of production and the replacement of people with machines to permanent unemployment, to the appearance of extra people. And unemployment leads to a decrease in purchasing power and a decrease in the sales market. There is a constant narrowing of opportunities and profit for all can not be enough. In pursuit of profits and growth, capital is forced to start a competition-war with its own kind, destroying the weak and ineffective, conquering their sales markets, destroying excess production, putting resources and money under control, further exacerbating the situation. It turns out a vicious circle, leading to even greater aggravation of competition right up to its exit from the rule of law. As a result, either a major war or minor wars aimed at using extra people to destroy economies, production of their competitors and control of more expensive resources. The West has proposed a game and a speckled deck of cards, in which those few who have natural advantages have already learned to play and can continue to play Russia, China, but for the West this is a loss anyway.
    1. JonnyT
      JonnyT April 11 2013 12: 57 New
      +3
      In general, capitalism is certain death on the planet. Dead end branch of human development. It is necessary to change the global system. It is a pity that communism and socialism did not adapt, did not evolve, although this is not the end!
  15. Begemot
    Begemot April 11 2013 10: 40 New
    11
    A bit chaotic, but the idea is correct. The world is ruled by capital, it is cross-border and what the hell does it come from which state the profit comes from, so capital does not need separate states, it needs cheap resources and cheap labor. At the same time, you can finally gut the fat wallets of Europeans and Americans: not by producing, but only by consuming, they will quickly (in the historical sense) go bankrupt and again become a cheap labor force. While not much of it is needed, productivity allows for a minimum of labor. There is only one thorn in this game - Russia. Well, in no way she does not agree to give resources for nothing, it seems that they have already bought Gorbachev, and Yeltsin pushed everything under a drunken shop and everything was already working out for the world hydra in the late 90s, and here on you, again almost everything is down the drain, remained, however, the nouveau riche, but those did not last long, who was thrown into the slammer, and who was forced to “kiss the cross” for loyalty. Of course, this pack will still keep a fig in his pocket, but very soon there will be a heart-to-heart talk with them. As long as the military solution of access to resources will be more expensive than just buying them, they will not stick out, but this cost of aggression must be maintained at the highest possible level.
    1. Fornit
      Fornit April 11 2013 15: 13 New
      +1
      Strong and accurate !!! +5
  16. Alex66
    Alex66 April 11 2013 10: 51 New
    +6
    A direct clash with Russia without preliminary exhaustion in a guerrilla war is hardly possible, just look at Syria, with direct intervention, the enemy would have suffered many losses and it was not even in Russia and China. Direct intervention would rally Syria in the face of aggression, as it was in the USSR during the Second World War. But the Soviet Union was more united before the war, had a spirit, and now I honestly don’t want to fight for our billionaires who rob their country, for whose officials they do not put prisoners, only by the quick Kvachkov and Khabarov they gave deadlines (so would be with Serdyukov and K), only one incentive is family and faith; I find no other. There is no cohesive working-peasant class, plankton, officials, etc. they won’t go to war and they value themselves highly.
    Of course, I’ll go and fight, and two reasons are enough, but the government needs to think that the citizens had as many of these reasons as possible. If they are for us, not the Cossacks mishandled.
  17. Rubik
    Rubik April 11 2013 10: 53 New
    -3
    Whoever wrote the article, let them find a car assembled in China in the USA. Even the Japanese assemble their cars in the USA. In America, there are high duties on car imports; almost all global car manufacturers assemble their cars for the US market in the USA and Canada. In Detroit, they really don’t make cars; they are made in other states, in Ohio, a large Honda plant, in Alabama Mercedes and so on throughout the country.

    He also smiled about loans, the difference with the old days was that there was no middle class before, and the poor were not given loans as well as secured, but there were always loans, the author does not know how many years banks exist?

    And the last question concerns the name of Muhamed, then this is the most popular name among the Muslim population, if roughly 10 Muslims call their children Muhammad, and 90 English name Harry, John, William, Arthur, etc. and each name will receive 5 children, then Muzzamed will remain the most popular name, but this does not mean that Muslim children are more English. I understand that Islamafobes in Europe need to inflate an elephant from a fly and shout that Muslims are taking over Europe, it’s time to nominate their Fuhrer in power, and our media are happy to grab these ducks and let them replicate for their own purposes.
    1. Atlon
      Atlon April 11 2013 12: 20 New
      +7
      Quote: Rubik
      I understand that Islamafobes in Europe need to inflate an elephant from a fly and shout that Muslims are taking over Europe, it’s time to put forward their Fuhrer in power, and our media are happy to seize these ducks and let them replicate for their own purposes.

      Well, yes ... And the Islamic "patrols" on the streets of London, these are theatrical performances of the creative British ... laughing
      1. Rubik
        Rubik April 11 2013 16: 38 New
        -1
        Quote: Atlon

        Well, yes ... And the Islamic "patrols" on the streets of London, these are theatrical performances of the creative British ... laughing

        I very much doubt that you have ever been to England. London, by the way, is not the whole of England, just like Moscow is not Russia.
    2. Sirocco
      Sirocco April 11 2013 12: 26 New
      +2
      Quote: Rubik
      . In Detroit, they really don’t make cars, they are made in other states,

      You are right in Detroit, there is nothing. And there you can buy a good cottage for just 1000 green. Just for some reason, no one is willing. There, as in a movie, the dead with braids stand, and, silence.
      1. Rubik
        Rubik April 11 2013 16: 40 New
        -1
        Quote: Sirocco

        You are right in Detroit, there is nothing. And there you can buy a good cottage for just 1000 green. Just for some reason, no one is willing. There, as in a movie, the dead with braids stand, and, silence.

        Have you seen the Detroit subway? You will not find such infrastructure as in Detroit in most Russian cities. The poorest city in the United States will give odds to many of the Russian average. You are no longer comparing standards.

        I lived in the United States for more than one year. When I lived there, I criticized a lot, but when I arrived in the countries of the former USSR, I realized that there are countries where there are big problems.
    3. JonnyT
      JonnyT April 11 2013 13: 01 New
      +1
      Are you apparently a native American?
      Also say that Vaz is going to the USA))))
      All harmful production transferred from the states to other countries! The United States is for the most part a country of managers, lawyers!
      1. Atlon
        Atlon April 11 2013 13: 40 New
        +4
        Quote: JonnyT
        The United States is for the most part a country of managers, lawyers!

        Write as it is: the United States is for the most part a country of loafers! laughing
        1. Sirocco
          Sirocco April 11 2013 14: 30 New
          +6
          You are wrong, I do not agree with this quote of yours.
          Quote: Atlon
          : The United States is for the most part a country of loafers!

          The nation of liberators.



          The American nation was originally laid as a nation of liberators.

          Immediately after the discovery of America, they began to liberate Europe from the scum of society - criminals, murderers, scammers, fugitive convicts and other scum.

          Based on a new location, they found that the numerous bison grazing on the prairies pose a mortal threat to the local population - the Indians, and therefore quickly liberated the continent from these completely worthless animals.

          After this came the turn of the Indians themselves - they were released in special concentration camps - reservations.

          Looking around, the Americans saw that Africa was moaning from the yoke of blacks, and made a lot of efforts to free the Black Continent from them. Then there were all sorts of minor exemptions, such as Mexico from its two northern states and the like pranks.

          The biggest liberation happened in the middle of the 20th century. While the USSR fought bloody battles in Europe with fascism, the Americans struggled to free the uninhabited islands of the Pacific Ocean, and until then freed themselves to save the world from fascism. At the end of the war, they applied a new method of liberation in two peaceful Japanese cities, for which the Japanese are grateful to them to this day.

          After World War II, there were no longer outstanding liberation, except for attempts to liberate Korea, Vientama, and other small states.

          An attempt to liberate Libya, Syria, Yugoslavia, Grenada and Panama must also be added to the list of exemptions. In general, since 1945, the United States managed to bomb in 22 independent states.

          The most recent liberation was Yugoslavia and Afghanistan Iraq, Libya, Syria. Syria is currently being freed, probably with the aim of freeing it from the people of the elected president ...
          1. Atlon
            Atlon April 11 2013 14: 42 New
            +4
            Quote: Sirocco
            Syria is currently being freed, probably with the aim of freeing it from the people of the elected president ...

            Yeah ... Preferably with the people! good
        2. Rubik
          Rubik April 11 2013 16: 54 New
          -4
          Quote: Atlon

          Write as it is: the United States is for the most part a country of loafers! laughing

          Because you think you live worse than America. In America, there are loafers, but most people plow from morning till night doing completely different jobs, some plowing with their brains, some with their hands. Unlike Russia, where the basis of the national economy is oil and gas, there are no tech giants to you.
      2. Rubik
        Rubik April 11 2013 16: 50 New
        -3
        Quote: JonnyT
        Are you apparently a native American?
        Also say that Vaz is going to the USA))))
        All harmful production transferred from the states to other countries! The United States is for the most part a country of managers, lawyers!

        Not native, but lived in America. VAZ is not going to the USA, because no one is buying it in the USA, it is unlikely that VAZ has the means to invest in the USA in its sales, revenue and dependence on state aid. Harmful production may be postponed, but for the production of US cars one of the world leaders. They lead, and the rest, whether in America, China or elsewhere, do their job.

        I don’t understand where you got so much cliche about America from. Are you so functionally illiterate that you are even unable to find information on the American economy, industry, etc.? The United States exports goods almost like the entire GDP of the Russian Federation. In 2012, the United States exported $ 1.612 trillion worth of goods. But most of the goods are sold in the domestic market. Not one business will not thrive without managers and lawyers, this is for you to note. A manager is a manager. And in the USA, managers are not the same as in Russia, in Russia managers are called anyone who sits in the office, in the USA they are usually managers.
    4. Nayhas
      Nayhas April 11 2013 18: 26 New
      -4
      Don't rip people off the template. However, the "Russian" journalist Leontyev tells them something wrong ...
  18. habalog
    habalog April 11 2013 10: 56 New
    +4
    All military maintenance costs are easy to write off - use. No rocket - no operating costs. So they "write off" in resource-intensive republics and states. sad
    I think the states are a tool. They will be written off in the same way as Germany at one time. Pumping resources. Huge costs for the military commissar. Rise to power .. I don’t even know what to call these people .. aggressive currents. That's how many decades - that the Republicans, that the Democrats - have been fighting.

    Our politicians act very interestingly:
    It’s impossible to rely on the separatists for the thieves - there the Union is growing. There will be a blow to the BRICS - we have OPEC, APEC. They will hit the SCO - there is the CSTO. Stretching the forces of the hell on all fronts wink Where will our blow come from? So far, BRICS has flown in - the creation of a common development bank. Our military-industrial complex is pumping regional centers around the world with strategic weapons (..on credit..) RosKosmos periodically "accidentally" drops amerskie satellites.

    While we live good
    1. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker April 11 2013 18: 43 New
      +4
      Quote: habalog
      I think the states are a tool. They will be written off in the same way as Germany at one time.

      A very interesting analogy and vision of the situation!
      hi
  19. Backfire
    Backfire April 11 2013 11: 20 New
    +6
    Quote: tungus
    I think it's a little more complicated. If we accept the hypothesis that the United States is focusing on the military seizure of the world as true, then we get a number of "inexplicable" actions. First, why are Americans destroying countries instead of colonizing them? In all countries where America brought democracy, there are civil wars. The population is at war with each other. The infrastructure is collapsing. No profit. And the second thing. Why are Americans spreading their liberal values ​​around the world? Values ​​leading to the degeneration of humanity. Moreover, this degeneration affects the Americans themselves. It seems to me that the goal is not to capture the world, but to reduce the population of planet Earth.


    Not the United States using military force, something captures there. The US is simply used as a tool.

    Which countries are being destroyed? If you are talking about the Middle East, then the "sponsors" of what we see in Syria now are Qatar and Saudi Arabia. The reasons are oil and gas, as well as the routes of future gas pipelines.
    There are no big wars after all. So the "blow" to consumers from the point of view of the global economy is small.
    Gaddafi seems to have generally intended to introduce an African Dinar tied to gold. Hurried a little.

    And what about liberal values ​​is rightly noted, but who told you what the goal of preserving the white race is worth? The white race is the only diminishing race on Earth. Everything seems to be going according to plan. And again, these "values" are not being enforced by the United States. You would know how people here are unhappy with this, to put it mildly.
  20. Slevinst
    Slevinst April 11 2013 11: 22 New
    0
    Many theories on this article can be developed. And not one of them can not be said that here it is the truth. You can even assume that the world is really someone rebuilds for themselves. But for what purpose is the question. I do not think that this so-called elite really wants to make everyone hamsters who will work for them only. They already have enough money and power. Where should they spend these billions if they already have everything? Personally, I want more to believe in the theory of chaos that everything turns out by itself as a result of the actions of everyone. Naturally, people with power have a greater influence on history, but in any case, everything will continue until some universal force intervenes or a person destroys himself.
  21. Backfire
    Backfire April 11 2013 11: 30 New
    +8
    Quote: Slevinst
    Personally, I want to believe in the theory of chaos more that everything turns out by itself as a result of the actions of each and everyone


    Oh, if only. Take, for example, "Juvenile Justice" - is being introduced simultaneously, in different countries, on different continents. In every country it is above the law. You have it already "on the way" and take an interest in what is going on, say, in neighboring Finland.

    And about why they want to twist everyone into a ram’s horn, turning it into a chipped, zombie herd. Because if this is not done, it will happen as in Iceland.
    That you haven’t heard anything about Iceland lately? Not surprising.
    The country is in an information blockade. The fact is that in the midst of the acute phase of the crisis of 2008-2009, they said: we will not pay the debts of Bankers (a combination of a banker and a gangster). The country refused to pay debts, the main banker is wanted. On-line they wrote costumes. Abandoned all IMF loans.
    Despite the general silence, the rating agencies avariciously admit: Iceland is getting out of the crisis at an unprecedented pace with a dynamics that neither the US nor the European Union can even dream of.
    1. Slevinst
      Slevinst April 11 2013 12: 04 New
      +4
      I admit nothing heard of Iceland. Well done, what can I say. Russia also needs to score at all and go its own way. The rest of the normal countries will catch up
      1. fghjvbn13
        fghjvbn13 April 13 2013 14: 29 New
        0
        for me, too, news. Could-more?
    2. Atlon
      Atlon April 11 2013 12: 25 New
      +5
      Quote: Backfire
      Iceland is emerging from the crisis at an unprecedented pace with a dynamic that does not even dream of either the US or the EU.

      Seems to me that they have a disagreement with "democracy" ... Well, like there is none at all ... And where is America looking? repeat
  22. fenix57
    fenix57 April 11 2013 11: 49 New
    +1
    ++++, the first thing that came to mind while reading an article: MATRIX .... hi recourse
    1. Atlon
      Atlon April 11 2013 12: 27 New
      +4
      Quote: fenix57
      the first thing that came to mind while reading the article: MATRIX ...

      You know ... Of all the "notions" of science fiction writers a century ago, perhaps one thing has not come true (so far): Time Machine.
  23. Kozma
    Kozma April 11 2013 11: 59 New
    11
    Russia cannot be defeated by external aggression. Historically proven. It’s cheaper and safer to decompose it from the inside, to nurture the Army of Traitors (Vlasov) - the fifth column, and let this fifth column destroy the Russian state. The Army of Traitors, funded from abroad, has a pyramid structure. Its task: exposing Russia as an under-state - backward and clogged, descritation of Russian patriots (see the image of Minin and Pozharsky), demolition of Russian citizens in their struggle for their state, decomposition of Russian state structures. The dream of the West is a civil war in Russia, similar to the one that is now in Syria. This Army of Traitors - the fifth column is now preparing it. For the West, of course, it is better for Russia to fall as the USSR at once and in its entirety, so as not to finish it off - many unpleasant moments can arise. And there already do what you want. But the question is - does the people of Russia want such a fate for themselves?
    1. Nesvet Nezar
      Nesvet Nezar April 11 2013 14: 49 New
      +2
      Quote: Cosma
      Russia cannot be defeated by external aggression. Historically proven. It’s cheaper and safer to decompose it from the inside, to nurture the Army of Traitors (Vlasov) - the fifth column, and let this fifth column destroy the Russian state. The Army of Traitors, funded from abroad, has a pyramid structure. Its task: exposing Russia as an under-state - backward and clogged, descritation of Russian patriots (see the image of Minin and Pozharsky), demolition of Russian citizens in their struggle for their state, decomposition of Russian state structures. The dream of the West is a civil war in Russia, similar to the one that is now in Syria. This Army of Traitors - the fifth column is now preparing it. For the West, of course, it is better for Russia to fall as the USSR at once and in its entirety, so as not to finish it off - many unpleasant moments can arise. And there already do what you want. But the question is - does the people of Russia want such a fate for themselves?


      Apparently he wants to once Ukraine exists as an independent state. All of you correctly said that the existence of Ukraine is proof of that. Russia was crushed from the inside ....
  24. nikolas 83
    nikolas 83 April 11 2013 12: 21 New
    0
    The author of the article is right. The Americans crush the world by any means and pretexts. Their resources come to an end and they sleep and see how to capture Russia, its resources. They buy whole governments for their green (which cost nothing).
  25. nikolas 83
    nikolas 83 April 11 2013 12: 22 New
    0
    The author of the article is right. The Americans crush the world for themselves by any means and pretexts. Their resources come to an end and they sleep and see how to capture Russia, its resources. They buy entire governments for their green (which cost nothing). And what’s the worst , people are for sale.
  26. nikolas 83
    nikolas 83 April 11 2013 12: 24 New
    +4
    The author of the article is right. The Americans crush the world by any means and pretexts. Their resources come to an end and they sleep and see how to capture Russia, its resources. They buy whole governments for their green (which cost nothing).
  27. Nikolay-
    Nikolay- April 11 2013 12: 42 New
    +1
    Quote: Backfire
    Pick up any US dollar bill. And what do we read there? BANKNOTE OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE! This is a private shop whose owners are unknown.

    Just why are unknown? You further call them yourself - Jewish financial oligarchs. Cosmopolitanism is their traditional attitude, since they never had their own national state (the legend of ancient Judea is nothing more than a legend. Jerusalem and the Temple never existed on the site of El-Quds).
  28. pa_nik
    pa_nik April 11 2013 12: 47 New
    +4
    Quote: Alex66
    only one incentive is family and faith; I find no other.


    Yes, at any time, this was precisely the incentive for picking up arms, well .. still a small homeland, well .. still a homeland-fatherland. laughing

    I mean that at any time there were "oligarchs" - "functionaries". They were called bari or something else, but the meaning remained, and will remain the same: we have and will have something to fight for hi and it will not be oligarchs or nomenclature, but - this birch, that church on the other side of the river ... I think it makes no sense to continue. drinks
  29. Nikolay-
    Nikolay- April 11 2013 12: 51 New
    0
    Pick up any US dollar bill. And what do we read there? BANKNOTE OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE! This is a private shop whose owners are unknown.

    Just why are unknown? You further call them - world financial oligarchs. Cosmopolitanism is their traditional attitude, because they never had their own national state. The legend that instead of the Omar mosque once stood the Temple is nothing more than a legend.
  30. ... in motu
    ... in motu April 11 2013 13: 45 New
    0
    Author steers!
  31. Kars
    Kars April 11 2013 13: 54 New
    +5
    I see the main problem in the banking sector and its greed. Even during the crisis in leading banks, bonuses are over the top for billions. All the evil comes from private banks, while they mostly refund from government agencies. Banks must be state owned and there must be one. Credit the rate should not exceed that necessary to finance its hardware activity and low liquidity.
    Sberbank of the USSR was almost perfect if it could still give out a loan for business, but there was no business in the USSR, especially private.
  32. Serov
    Serov April 11 2013 14: 17 New
    0
    An interesting article, there is something to think about.
  33. biglow
    biglow April 11 2013 14: 28 New
    +1
    A confusing article, started for health and ended for peace. America’s geopolitical goal is global control, and all methods are suitable for this, bribery, deceit, blackmail,
    The example of Uzbekistan is a typical deception, of a nearby bai, to which everyone promised that he asked, but as a result, he will lose his throne and get nothing.
    America benefits from instability around the borders of Russia, and the more instability there is, the more forces and means it will have to spend on solving the problems associated with it. And Russia's weakness is always a force for the United States. That's all.
    And everything else is from a completely different opera ...
  34. vladkust
    vladkust April 11 2013 14: 39 New
    +2
    The author, well done, laid out everything intelligibly. I also advise everyone to watch the film "Home. Travel story" produced by Luc Besson, there are a lot of interesting things in it touching on our "life of civilization", here is one moment from the film made me seriously think about who is still beneficial to the reduction of the world's population ... , somewhere in Africa 200 thousand. people (although there are many more such ladies) live in a tent city, they cannot grow anything there, the earth does not allow, there is no water, they are not any living creatures either. They are just waiting for when they will be fed and given a "red cross" .... I wonder who would like to be in such a situation ??? When you don't even want to feed yourself, you can't. And they also breed, that's what to do with such a population of the earth ??? to feed forever and for free, no one wants to !!! There is only one thing left to give a weapon and say "somewhere out there" there is water and fertile land you will be able to feed yourself at least you will be full, only the population of those places are not worthy of life, push them out of there ..... hence the conclusions alone will fight for bread well and their puppeteers will take away everything else valuable, everything they need, "land" with all the resources, and then you can get rid of the illiterate Africans in enough ways.
    We conclude that one does not need to feed for free, others will die out under the onslaught ... a handful of "elite" remains with all earthly blessings ...)))))
  35. Igorisep
    Igorisep April 11 2013 15: 00 New
    0
    The main conclusion is not true in the article. To think that we are controlled by wise people is self-deception. The world is ruled by the system of laws of human society (including vices), and His Majesty the case. Plus for understanding reality.
  36. Canep
    Canep April 11 2013 15: 02 New
    -3
    The USA and the West can be achieved very simply - to raise gas prices (unilaterally Russia for Europe is a monopolist) by 30-50%, this will lead to a decrease in gas demand and to a sharp increase in oil demand, which will entail an increase in its price to catastrophic prices for the West, there will be whole industries - chemical, energy, metallurgy, etc.
  37. Butchcassidy
    Butchcassidy April 11 2013 18: 09 New
    +1
    Comparison with "Civilization" is not bad. The only question is that we understand the processes taking place in the world and give adequate answers to them.

    If the enemy took the fortress, then this is his function, but if the defenders surrendered their fortress, then they have no one to blame ...
  38. zav
    zav April 11 2013 18: 10 New
    0
    All the most vile and base, despised at another time will become the norm and the absolute truth. Everything will be decided for us - from the place of our leisure work to the duration of our lives and the fate of our children. This is ordinary fascism, where instead of concentration camps and barbed wire, a technogenic big brother will watch us.


    “What's wrong with that? Only that at this moment the bowels of the earth are being emptied, but in general the nature of the earth is changing faster than a minute ago. When the thirst for life forces people to beg for alms from nature, she will remember this to us.
    Soon society will begin to suffocate in a ring of problems, seeing no way out. If before the peasant fed ten people, but today one hundred, this means only one thing: ninety percent of the eaters are now feeding on irreplaceable, diminishing, expensive resources. It also means that soon we - the common people, and not the oligarchs - will eat God knows what. For example, synthetic cakes made in factories from ingredients currently unknown to science. After a series of disgusting scenes, they will be given out on cards. But this later, but at first ... You yourself will not notice how you will learn to determine the quality of cakes by color and smell in those short moments while they fly from the distribution window into the raging crowd. You say they won't? How will they do it. It's like two fingers to them. The minute humanity put super-rich people on its neck, it agreed to humiliation and invited its own death by starvation. "
    proza.ru/2010/10/08/700
  39. cdrt
    cdrt April 11 2013 18: 32 New
    0
    Moments in an article about countless hordes of managers, hairdressers, etc. reminded of Douglas Adams.
    There, when people moved from their ancestral home to Earth, three ships flew: one with scientists and artists, the second with workers and the third with hairdressers, managers, marketers and the military.
    The first two somewhere crashed and only the third flew to Earth wink You can say the circle closes wink
  40. Nayhas
    Nayhas April 11 2013 19: 18 New
    0
    "According to the terms of the" game ", their" units ", unlike ours, it is almost impossible to" pump "on such important characteristics as" honor "," valor "," willingness to sacrifice "," courage "." - well, of course, this is only available to Russians.
  41. 11Goor11
    11Goor11 April 11 2013 19: 21 New
    +4
    And what will happen in 20 years, when today's babies go to the army? And for whom, if necessary, they will fight?

    And why not, Muslims - Sunnis born in the country with the beautiful name Francistan, will protect it from the Shiites born in Germany.
  42. Backfire
    Backfire April 11 2013 23: 35 New
    +1
    Quote: Atlon
    Seems to me that they have a disagreement with "democracy" ... Well, like there is none at all ... And where is America looking?


    I already wrote that it’s not America, it is waging all those wars where the US armed forces are participating - look up the branch.

    And as for Iceland - so they have democracy and no oil!
    Well, who needs them ?!
  43. pinecone
    pinecone April 12 2013 00: 02 New
    0
    The most effective weapon of the world financial kagala is the Great Migration No. 2.
  44. serge
    serge April 12 2013 02: 20 New
    +1
    This is a strategy not of the West, but of the ancient enemies of mankind - the Zionists. This is the millennia-old struggle of the Jews against the white race. In all countries with a white population, Aryans became second-class people and are subjected to creeping genocide. The only country where a white man feels like a master, despite all the wars and revolutions, remains Russia (Ukraine, Belarus). Naturally, a military operation is planned against her with the help of a fighting Jewish elephant - the United States of America. That's just there will be no winners in a nuclear war, no matter how many percent of the population after the exchange of nuclear strikes did not survive at first. After the global war, the history of mankind will begin again, if at all.
  45. Centaurus
    Centaurus April 13 2013 12: 01 New
    0
    In my opinion, what to expect the collapse of the United States from the collapse of the economy due to unjustified costs of the state budget, it is better to help it. At least a little bit.

    I note right away, I personally would not want the United States bombed with nuclear weapons, drowned the tsunami, etc. (well, except perhaps to the extreme).

    Ordinary people living in the USA who love their children, go to work, love, meet and get married, do not cause aggression in me.

    But to throw the United States off the pedestal of the Unipolar world and break up NATO is definitely necessary.
    Because the top of their power is unlikely to calm down itself. Already the whole world has hesitated, even their citizens!

    ... Well, happen, God forbid, what everyone has been waiting since the 45th, the Russians will not stay alone for any!
    If necessary, I’ll go to war against the adversaries from the west with my grandfather’s double-barreled shotgun.)
  46. rocketman
    rocketman April 13 2013 16: 04 New
    0
    no time to read all the comments, I'm sorry ...
    But! Everything in the article is correct, only one thing is not taken into account - the federal reserve system will print the Americans as many bucks as they need, therefore the reference to the "kink" of the economy, to put it mildly, is untenable. While the whole world works for bucks, amers can do nothing at all - they will buy everything.
  47. kursantosha
    kursantosha April 13 2013 21: 19 New
    +1
    We have sowed light and we will sow light! In this game there will be only one winner - Russia! no nya and no europioids!
  48. mn2411
    mn2411 April 14 2013 14: 25 New
    0
    interesting conclusions I agree with the author
  49. Akuzenka
    Akuzenka April 15 2013 15: 31 New
    0
    All linguistic research is good and the spirituality of our people is high and much is hidden in the language. But let us nevertheless admit that the pin is strong, stronger than us and in this situation, along with many other things, the ability to sacrifice our people is one of the fundamental factors of our future Victory. So we will raise children in this spirit. (commonplace, of course, but as it was, it was).
  50. lukyanov
    lukyanov April 16 2013 08: 09 New
    0
    A little bit of my thoughts on the topic of the new war http://m.livejournal.com/read/user/lordangmar/6797