Military Review

How we were weaned from the fact that Russia is a superpower

281
At one time (December 2010 of the year) Dmitry Medvedev (the then President of Russia), giving a lecture at the Indian Institute of Technology, unexpectedly for many, said that the Russian Federation does not claim to be a superpower. He noted that he was not thrilled that someone uses such terminology, because such terms do not help ensure the competitive development of the state. Of course, Medvedev wanted to emphasize that in the modern world he sees the desire for multipolarity, which means that the statement about Russia as a superpower can cause someone to have a non-standard reaction - a reaction to the attempt of the Russian Federation to stand out against others. Although how can you stand out when it comes to multipolarity? ..




In general, the president (then) wanted it to be diplomatic, but everything turned out somehow doubtful.

I remember that many of those who then had the opportunity to evaluate Dmitry Medvedev's speech in real time, after what he heard, subjected the words of Medvedev to sharp criticism. And it is not strange, we are talking about both the Russian and the Indian public. In India, Russia, no matter what happens on our political and economic platforms, is used to being perceived by that power, which has a fairly large weight in the world. The words of the Russian leader were actually aimed at debunking such an image, and therefore many of those who gathered from Medvedev's message had a somewhat ambivalent feeling: if the President of a Great country declares that this country does not need to be considered Great, but the epithet is sufficiently competitive, or simply close to the possibilities of economic competition, then begin to torment vague doubts, what about the so-called foreign partners in general to behave with today's Russia ...

No less doubt began to torment the public in Russia. And these torments have not come to naught to this day. Let us try to understand what these contradictions are today, which, by and large, strike Russians in self-consciousness, and in relation to Russia, citizens of foreign countries.

So, at one time, literally with mother's milk, we came to understand that the country in which we were born is a truly great power, which is capable of solving even the most complex problems with a great desire. The ideological background was so solid that any doubts that arose about this could be considered from the evil one. We knew for sure that We are one sixth of the land, that We have the largest mineral reserves, that We are the most reading nation in the world, that We created the best education system on the planet, that We have two allies - the army and the fleet and that Our strength is in the friendship of nations.

But now the era of change has come (or, more accurately, to say that this era has been dragged by the ears), and the changes have hit the country and our self-consciousness in such a way that it’s noisy. We suddenly began to actively grind into the mind the idea that we are all different, and that we have little in common, that we were united solely on blood, and not on the fact that there is a desire to unite, and that the main benefit over the years of its "hopeless existence" we missed, but our "friends" from the West can still help us - they will at least hold onto the tip of the tail of this very good. Of course, we grabbed the end of the tail, but at the same time we had to “taste” and everything that periodically jumped out of this tail, in our direction, and even feel the blows of the “blessed” rear hoofs ... Naturally, we immediately they began to wean the notion that we are a superpower. At that time there was only one superpower in the world, and she decided to observe her unique status, which she inherited as a gift from those who had split the Soviet Union with their own hands.
At one point, the geopolitical symbiosis that had developed over decades was disrupted. Most of the former Soviet republics did not know what to do with the independence that had fallen on them, the countries of Eastern Europe began to look around in search of new strategic partners, the overseas socialist territories (Vietnam, Cuba, DPRK, a number of African countries) were actually completely isolated.

But in order for people not to have a desire to grieve about this, ideological inspirers of building a unipolar world quickly declared that no such thing was a symbiosis, but the most common economic and political parasitism ... They say that Russia parasitized in the Baltic States, the Warsaw Pact countries on Russia, Moldovans drank the juice of Ukrainians, Ukrainians parasitized on the lands of the Crimean Tatars and so on to infinity. Thus, the “open” eyes of people who have already lost faith in themselves and their country saw the total disunity and the thesis declared from somewhere outside that man is a wolf. Such slogans as equality, fraternity, friendship of peoples, continuity of generations began to give up their places to slogans of a completely different nature: personal enrichment, neglect of social values, legal nihilism, complete and unlimited freedom at the expense of the freedom of others. We swallowed this pill, taking it out of a beautiful package, and only after some time realized all its bitterness, we are aware of it to this day ...

In the meantime, this awareness came to us, representatives of many foreign countries wondered, Russia finally lost its face and turned into one of the pillars of the unipolar world, supporting star-striped "democracy" with the export version, or, sooner or later, that the role of a pillar to support ideas and interests alien to her is not her role. Someone obviously wanted Russia to play precisely this role until the end of its existence on the world map, and someone openly declared that if Russia didn’t perk up, the world would finally plunge into chaos. And plunging into chaos manifested itself in ever more ugly forms: from the shameless invasion of the "peace bearing" NATO troops into Yugoslavia to the transformation of North Africa and the Middle East into a zone of incessant military clashes.

However, chaos, as a symptom of unipolarity, showed and shows itself not only in military terms. Chaos has come into the economy, which in recent years has been trying to reduce exclusively to the Western version with a foundation on an endless series of loans and lending. Soap economic bubbles began to inflate in different regions of the world, bursting and splashing everyone. Chaos came to culture. If earlier we were inculcated with the need to care about our native nature, respect for the older generation, soldiers-liberators, then today, it turns out, we should show paramount concern, except in relation to the LGBT community, rejoicing in the manner of kisses in front of the audience. Ivan is combined with Ivan, and Marya with Marya ...

It is obvious that today there is a definite request that Russia determine for itself the role in the global world. If she (that is, we) is going (going) to position herself as a state that is able to solve global geopolitical tasks, defend its interests and protect the interests of its strategic partners and friends, then it is time to satisfy this request. There are a lot of sites for this (the Customs Union, the SCO, and the BRICS). Well, and if our fate continues to be - dumb accomplices in the cultivation of one pole of the world, then we can continue to declare that we are far from a superpower, and this is not ours ...
Author:
281 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Romn
    Romn April 11 2013 08: 35 New
    109
    WE ARE SUPERPOWER!
    1. Ghenxnumx
      Ghenxnumx April 11 2013 08: 42 New
      140
      Quote: Romn
      WE ARE SUPERPOWER!

      Само георгафическое положение моей Родины и её размеры не дают ей опуститься до "конкурентоспособной страны" и многовековая история этот факт лишь подтверждает.
      Medvedev will remain in the history of Dimon - a narrow-minded person with short-sighted slogans, often he speaks as if his language lives a separate life.
      1. Bronis
        Bronis April 11 2013 10: 11 New
        47
        Для того чтобы понять являемся ли мы сверхдержавой, необходимо произвести небольшой анализ. Понятие "Сверхдеражва" - размытое, но общепринятыми является несколько качественных характеристик.
        1. The presence of a formalized, capable, state-oriented elite (not yet, DAM and Co. confirm this).
        2. Military power coupled with nuclear weapons (yes, especially strategic nuclear forces)
        3. Powerful diversified economy (10 economy in the world - not so bad, but not enough and it depends on energy production)
        4. Actual possession (control) of a powerful resource base - yes
        5. Political and economic control over a significant part of states (in the form of military, political or economic blocs, etc.) - no
        6. The presence of a wide range of geopolitical interests in various parts of the planet and the ability to project forces (military, political, economic, etc.) for their implementation. - practically no, the possibilities are very limited.
        7. Иногда еще приводят наличие универсальной идеологии (типа общества потребления или социализма) но это спорно. - Нет, сами в западную "струю" попали.
        Total Of the 7 (6) positions, we completely knock out two. Plus 0,5 points for geopolitics and economics. Total maximum 3 score. Conclusion. Present-day Russia is not a superpower (which does not cancel its status as one of the most powerful states). The identification of certain aspects as a “military superpower”, “energy superpower” is erroneous, because the concept is complex. In the latter case - especially.
        At the same time, only the United States more or less corresponds to such a definition, but the trend is such that they too may soon cease to correspond. Will there be a multipolar world then? Probably not. Most likely, a disturbing and turbulent world in which several powers will fight for the status of a superpower. This is the way humanity works. Do we need to enter this fight? It seems that yes. The question of survival. Otherwise, we will become not a subject of geopolitics, but its object.
        1. COBOK
          COBOK April 11 2013 11: 01 New
          14
          if you look, then control over the resource base is also written in the passive - the resources do not already belong to us (most of them are in private hands)
          1. Don
            Don April 11 2013 16: 49 New
            -31
            Quote: COBOK
            if you look, then control over the resource base is also written in the passive - the resources do not already belong to us (most of them are in private hands)

            And in what hands should it be? Only in the state? Why do you think so? She should be in private. In the US, 100% is private and nothing.
            1. T-130
              T-130 April 11 2013 17: 02 New
              +7
              In the USA, the crisis began and the dollar pyramid is ready to bring down the world economy there too. Good example! Let's create one too!
              1. Don
                Don April 11 2013 17: 15 New
                -11
                Quote: T-130
                In the USA, the crisis began and the dollar pyramid is ready to bring down the world economy there too. Good example! Let's create one too!

                In all countries, without exception, there are economic crises. It is not only private business that is to blame, but precisely the state to a greater extent. At the same time, the United States remains a superpower.
                1. Raven1972
                  Raven1972 April 11 2013 18: 47 New
                  +7
                  Dooh, if it weren’t for the state regulation of the economy but for the USA, the crisis would have been there 40 years ago and they would not have gotten out ... Or are you not aware that there is a Senate State Commission for Economic Regulation and its decisions are binding on EVERYONE?
                  Another Pope Roosevelt in the years 29-32. pulling the USA out of depression stole such a wonderful Soviet notion as the State Planning Commission ....
                  1. Don
                    Don April 12 2013 11: 24 New
                    -3
                    Quote: Raven1972
                    Senate State Commission for Economic Regulation and its decisions are binding on ALL?

                    I completely agree with you, the state should participate in the economic processes in the country. But just this means that the state was trying poorly to manage the economy, which is why I wrote:
                    Quote: Don
                    It is not only private business that is to blame, but precisely the state to a greater extent.

                    Let's remember how the discussion began. With a discussion of who should own resources in the country. And now we are discussing who should manage the economy. And this is a completely different conversation.
                2. Jin
                  Jin April 11 2013 18: 59 New
                  +6
                  Quote: Don
                  At the same time, the United States remains a superpower.


                  On someone else's oil and blood, it’s not good to do so ...
                  1. Don
                    Don April 12 2013 11: 27 New
                    -1
                    Quote: Jin
                    On someone else's oil and blood, it’s not good to do so ...

                    So I do not say that it is good. I myself do not like US foreign policy, but the USA is a superpower and this is a fact.
                    1. Che
                      Che April 13 2013 01: 44 New
                      0
                      Russia parasitized in the Baltic states, the Warsaw Pact countries - in Russia, Moldovans drank juices of Ukrainians, Ukrainians parasitized on the lands of Crimean Tatars and so on ad infinitum.
                      Russia, as it was a superpower, has remained so with it, no matter how the West wants the opposite. This is a given of Russia, we will overcome the traitors inside the country and take our historical place that belongs to us.
                      1. Petrospek
                        Petrospek April 13 2013 02: 09 New
                        0
                        uh how's it going
            2. lubin
              lubin April 11 2013 17: 19 New
              +8
              Resources should belong to the state, but take off work (mining, processing, transportation) can be given to private companies. But income from sales should belong to RUSSIA. ps And do not give an example of star-striped.
              1. Raven1972
                Raven1972 April 11 2013 18: 55 New
                +3
                The Merikosov has exactly the same way - the state has long bought deposits and their development is carried out under state control ... It also decides what to develop and what not ....
                1. Don
                  Don April 12 2013 12: 35 New
                  0
                  Quote: Raven1972
                  The Merikosov has exactly the same way - the state has long bought deposits and their development is carried out under state control ... It also decides what to develop and what not ....

                  Don’t throw off the link, where did you read this? The US Department of Energy, of course, monitors the processes in the energy sector, like the ministries of the Russian Federation or China, but the production of oil and gas from private corporations. The same applies to the extraction of copper, iron ore or coal. All in private hands. Ukrainian SCM Corporation owns a coal company in the United States. This is for example. So, let’s say, without fairy tales, that mining in the USA is in the hands of the state.
              2. Don
                Don April 12 2013 11: 31 New
                0
                Quote: lubin
                Resources should belong to the state, but take off work (mining, processing, transportation) can be given to private companies. But income from sales should belong to RUSSIA. ps And do not give an example of star-striped.

                Firstly, why can’t the USA be an example? This is the first economy in the world. Not happy with the USA, please. A striking example of Canada, Australia, UK, Germany. Secondly, do you speak only for resources or for industry too? Thirdly. For example, the Mechel concern has metallurgical plants, but there is no resource base (in fact, there is, but this is an example). They buy GOKs (iron ore) and coal mines. They buy them from the state. They invest money in them, pay taxes. And they are better directed than the state. In the public sector, corruption is always greater than in the private.
            3. Val_y
              Val_y April 11 2013 18: 00 New
              11
              Дык сша и не является государством в нашем понимании. Это мегакорпорация, где все вопросы решаются исключительно по принципу личного обогащения, и все действия направлены на достижения этого. Паразитический неоколониальный строй, все частное, даже ФРС это ЗАТ. Все, подчеркиваю, все деятели которые пытались изменить существующий строй были убиты, так что Ротшильды, Рокфеллеры, Морганы и т.д., будут препятствовать выдвижение любой страны на статус Супердержавы. Все европейские страны которые могли бы претендовать на этот статус в будущем, были разрушены и разорены (Германия, Франция, Испания, даже Голландия имели огромные колонии, а затем ВОВ и капец). Сталин волчьим чутьем понял это и про пагубность плана Маршала, с лязгом закрыл "железный занавес" перед носом бакса и у нас экономика была ВАХ (цены на заводах сразу выбивались мясорубка, что 1970, что 1987 стоила 3 руб 55 коп у матери обе до сих пор), и ресурсы, и образование, и медицина ЛУЧШИЕ. А это что им надо??? Поэтому нашили иуду и хресопродавца горби,затем перестройка, развал СССР и теперь "маемо шо маемо". Но я думаю мы все равно выдюжим, потому что мы все РУССКИЕ и всегда ПОБЕДА БУДЕТ ЗА НАМИ soldier And they put their tolerance in .....
              1. Raven1972
                Raven1972 April 11 2013 19: 01 New
                +4
                And most importantly - the Central Bank of the USSR was untied from the world banking system and did not depend on it in any way (like the Central Bank of China now)
                1. Don
                  Don April 12 2013 13: 26 New
                  -4
                  Quote: Raven1972
                  And most importantly - the Central Bank of the USSR was untied from the world banking system and did not depend on it in any way (like the Central Bank of China now)

                  Do you even know what functions the Central Bank performs, what does the global banking system have to do with it?
                  1. Raven1972
                    Raven1972 April 12 2013 19: 32 New
                    +2
                    Actually, I’m in the know, we don’t have to think we are worse than a steam locomotive ... In the USSR, the Central Bank was controlled by the state, and not from the outside as it is now, and the exchange rate of the gold (currency) ruble was not tied to the dollar if you do not know ... Therefore, we all world financial crises were to one place))) In addition to everything, there was an internal monetary unit, non-convertible, for settlements and settlements within the state (like a yuan in the same China) and not a single penny from the USSR left the cordon, respectively everything was enough money ...
                    1. Don
                      Don April 15 2013 16: 02 New
                      -1
                      Quote: Raven1972
                      Actually in the know, we don’t have to consider us worse than a steam train ...

                      I don’t think you are any better than the engine, otherwise I would not have a discussion with you.
                      Quote: Raven1972
                      In the USSR, the Central Bank was controlled by the state

                      I agree. So now, in accordance with the Federal Law of the Russian Federation “On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)”, the Bank of Russia is a legal entity. The authorized capital and other property of the Bank of Russia are federal propertyMoreover, the Bank of Russia is endowed with property and financial independence.
                      Quote: Raven1972
                      and not from the outside as it is now

                      So, who controls it? Could you tell? These conversations have been going on for a long time, but there is not a single evidence. Only the opinions of individual people. If the state does not manage the bank, then it belongs to the Rothschilds or the Rockefellers in any way. It means that according to any of them, in the theories of Zionist conspiracies, our friends with whom we do not drink are led.
                      Quote: Raven1972
                      and the exchange rate of the gold (currency) ruble was not tied to the dollar if you do not know

                      The Soviet ruble, starting in 1937, was pegged to the US dollar. And the price of gold, at that time, was also calculated in US dollars. The USSR wanted to create a gold ruble, but unfortunately Stalin did not succeed.
                      http://ungu.org/?p=4295
                      http://www.obretenie.info/events/russia/russia13.htm
                      If, for example, the SCO or the Eurasian Union could create a reserve currency, then they would have long abandoned the dollar.
                      Quote: Raven1972
                      Because to us all the global financial crises were to one place

                      And then there was only one crisis that played into our hands. Oil. And why then, by the end of the 80s, did we have an economy in .... was it? Could you tell? If not one crisis was not how much for us?
                      Quote: Raven1972
                      and not a single penny from the USSR left the cordon, so there was enough money for everything ...

                      Not a single penny did not go away, because rubles were not needed over the hill. The USSR took dollars for export deliveries and paid them over the hill.
              2. Che
                Che April 13 2013 01: 52 New
                0
                Soberly. Disease and decay from within, this amers have always used in their politics. It had to be a hunchback and ebn to hand over the country to enemies.
            4. Nina Czerny
              Nina Czerny April 11 2013 18: 59 New
              +4
              США свои ресурсы за границу не отдает и сделки с шейхами не разрешает, а "наша" ресурсная" база уже процентов на 70 принадлежит юридически не гражданам России.
              1. Raven1972
                Raven1972 April 11 2013 19: 07 New
                +1
                That's exactly what they get for themselves, and the state strictly monitors it ... God forbid to sell to someone, something without approval in the Senate ....
              2. Don
                Don April 12 2013 13: 38 New
                -1
                Quote: Nina Cerny
                США свои ресурсы за границу не отдает и сделки с шейхами не разрешает, а "наша" ресурсная" база уже процентов на 70 принадлежит юридически не гражданам России.

                People, can you finally start reading something before you carry nonsense. What is so difficult to go online to search for information? Nina, you're talking nonsense. Ukrainian SCM Corporation owns the United Coal Company, a coking coal company. The coal she supplies wherever he wants. The American metallurgical company Alcoa produces bauxite and produces aluminum, and it sells it in your way only from the USA? ExxonMobil, Chevron produces oil and gas in the United States and sells it wherever it wants. British British Petroleum produces oil in the United States and sells it wherever it wants. And what deals with sheikhs are you talking about? The United States is full of agreements with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman and the UAE. And what does the sheikhs have to do with it?
                Quote: Nina Cerny
                "наша" ресурсная" база уже процентов на 70 принадлежит юридически не гражданам России.

                Again, sheer nonsense. Do not carry nonsense, but read who owns Rosneft, Gazprom, Mechel, Severstal, Rusal, Norilsk Nickel, Lukoil.
            5. Deniska999
              Deniska999 April 11 2013 19: 34 New
              +5
              Have you collapsed from an oak tree? Factories, mineral deposits should belong to the state.
              1. Raven1972
                Raven1972 April 11 2013 20: 25 New
                0
                Yes, I somehow did not argue with this hi
              2. Don
                Don April 15 2013 17: 38 New
                0
                Quote: Deniska999
                Have you collapsed from an oak tree? Factories, mineral deposits should belong to the state.

                As I understand it, you turned to me ?! Well then, I have a question for you. And where did you fall from? From what tree, building, skyscraper that you think your opinion is the ultimate authority and the most correct. Are you smarter than everyone? So write the facts related to your opinion, and not one line.
            6. Su24
              Su24 April 13 2013 18: 53 New
              -1
              Quote: Don
              Quote: COBOK
              if you look, then control over the resource base is also written in the passive - the resources do not already belong to us (most of them are in private hands)

              And in what hands should it be? Only in the state? Why do you think so? She should be in private. In the US, 100% is private and nothing.


              What does the USA have to do with it? It doesn’t say anything at all, you never know what and how.
        2. Papakiko
          Papakiko April 11 2013 11: 30 New
          +7
          Quote: Bronis
          At the same time, only the United States more or less corresponds to this definition.

          from the article itself:
          At that time, the superpower was left alone in the world, and it decided to observe its unique status, which it actually received as a gift from those who split the Soviet Union with their own hands.

          Почему все поголовно, намеренно или по необразованности заабывают-замалчивают Британскую ИМПЕРИЮ (Союз), Французские колониальные последствия, Голландские "завоевания"и естественно Германские "потуги".
          "Матрас" в одиночку ".опой" бы треснул давно без поддержки "друзей".
          Достаточно посмотреть , как в ООН голосуют "независимые" "государства.
          1. Bronis
            Bronis April 11 2013 12: 15 New
            +6
            Why is everyone completely, intentionally or uneducated, forgetting and hushing up the British EMPIRE (Union)
            Да не забывают. Некоторые считали Британскую Империю сверхдержавой. Британское содружество - это уже не то. Современное Соединенное Королевство приведенным критериям не соответствует. Они иногда "тужатся", но самостоятельной роли не играют, двигаясь в русле проамериканской политики. Ну а нынешние "колониальные владения" Великобритании - ничейные, в основном, островки.
            In fact, before World War II there were several great powers (but not superpowers!): The British Empire, France, Germany, the USSR, Japan and the USA. Following the war, Germany and Japan suffered a direct defeat. France is the same as Britain (albeit unofficial). Their colonial empires began to crumble during the war, and by 50 they finally collapsed, partly falling under US control, and partly becoming battlefields of the Cold War.
            "Большая тройка" из войны вышла, скорее, в формате "2+". Явное усиление позиций произошло у США и СССР (у последнего - несоизмеримо большими жертвами). Великобритания еще сохраняла свое положение, но догнать США и СССР уже не могла. На арене остались две очень усилившиеся великие державы. Для них, в основном, и стали употреблять термин "сверхдержава". Они превзошли по своей мощи великие державы прошлого, стали центрами 2-ух мощнейших военно-политических блоков.
            Quote: Papakiko
            "Матрас" в одиночку ".опой" бы треснул давно без поддержки "друзей".
            Именно, что подтверждает тезис о том, что они уже не имеют самостоятельного статуса и не являются сверхдержавами. Да и статус "великих держав" им примеривать все сложнее...
            1. Papakiko
              Papakiko April 11 2013 15: 06 New
              +2
              Quote: Bronis
              колониальные владения" Великобритании - ничейные

              My friend, you look soberly at the globe and you will see Australia + Canada and a lot of little things.
              После этого Великобританию запишите в "3 сортные страны"?
              1. Bronis
                Bronis April 11 2013 15: 52 New
                +6
                Well, Australia, well, Canada. Well, the British Commonwealth. Even more fun than the CIS. There is such a concept of sovereignty. So, Canada and Australia have it. More precisely, there is actual and legal independence from the UK. I understand that most do not go into legal details, I will try to explain it in an accessible way. They do not recognize the jurisdiction of the UK legal system, its executive authorities over itself. lead an independent foreign and domestic policy. They have all the components of the state: sovereignty, currency, legal system, system of power, armed forces. But they call the head of state the British Queen. I emphasize my own state. They are, formally, monarchies, and not part (colony) under Great Britain. Why is that? Historical aspect - the British Empire has not been able to effectively retain all its colonies since the last quarter of the 19th century. Therefore, the most loyal (with the English-speaking population) acquired a special legal status. And their autonomy gradually turned into independence. The British Commonwealth was not created to unite, but to try to maintain British influence. But it didn’t work out everywhere. In fact, it’s like the CIS. They created not for unification, but a civilized divorce. So the British Commonwealth is not an empire. India, by the way, is also in it. But she is completely independent.
                Great Britain does not belong to third-rate countries. But it is no longer an empire, much less a superpower.
                Quote: Papakiko
                My friend, you look at the globe with a sober look

                Here, son, somehow. laughing And I do not abuse alcohol, although good cognac in the evening and hunting - only for.
                And more correct, more correct. laughing Не включайте "злобного школьника" не идет Вам.
                1. Papakiko
                  Papakiko April 11 2013 21: 02 New
                  -2
                  Quote: Bronis
                  So the British Commonwealth is not an empire. India, by the way, is also in it

                  You tell the Indians that they are in the British Commonwealth.
                  Cowards pulled over the head do not get off. wink
                  The CIS and the British Commonwealth, magically speaking Guano and Jam.
                  В Какой из стран СНГ ВВП встречают и боготворят, как Королеву "Мелкобритании"?? И это только внешний антураж. Про внутренние не нужно распылятся. Какое государство в СНГ свои базы, ресурсы, армию по первой просьбе предоставят России?
                  They do not recognize the jurisdiction of the UK legal system, its executive authorities over itself. lead an independent foreign and domestic policy. They have all the components of the state: sovereignty, currency, legal system, system of power, armed forces. But they call the head of state is the british queen.
                  Типо мы "-олигофрены" и не понимаем мироустройство и незалежность и самостийность?

                  Поэтому, вы типа не писали вами выше изложенную "дурость" а мы её не видели. Договорились? drinks
                2. Don
                  Don April 12 2013 16: 10 New
                  0
                  Quote: Bronis
                  In fact, it’s like the CIS. They created not for unification, but a civilized divorce. So the British Commonwealth is not an empire. India, by the way, is also in it. But she is completely independent.

                  By the way, South Africa, Pakistan and Malaysia, too, but they are definitely independent.
                  1. bddrus
                    bddrus April 12 2013 16: 18 New
                    0
                    formally, the queen is the commander in chief of their armies. in the event of war, loyal subjects disobey their queen (including Canada seem)
              2. Nina Czerny
                Nina Czerny April 11 2013 19: 03 New
                +2
                Как бы не было велико "Британское содружество", в политическом плане оно следует за США и "самостоятельность" демонстрирует только в ЕС, который слабый и бюрократический.
                1. Tverichanka
                  Tverichanka April 11 2013 23: 08 New
                  0
                  Quote: Nina Cerny
                  самостоятельность" демонстрирует только в ЕС

                  Догадываюсь,что я Вас разочарую,но Вы зря сомневаетесь в самостоятельности Британии,или плохо знаете вопрос.Таки она является мозговым центром,а США только орудие(здоровый такой амбал без мозгов).Достаточно хотя бы понимать-почему все "наши"толстосумы живут там,а не в Америке.Это так навскидку.Вообще-то все гораздо серьезней.
              3. rodevaan
                rodevaan April 11 2013 19: 53 New
                +1
                Quote: Papakiko
                Quote: Bronis
                колониальные владения" Великобритании - ничейные

                My friend, you look soberly at the globe and you will see Australia + Canada and a lot of little things.
                После этого Великобританию запишите в "3 сортные страны"?


                - Dear! What is the British Commonwealth? Well, first of all, where did you get the idea that Australia and Canada are global players on the world stage? It’s nobody and there’s no way to call them, directly speaking. Colonies or dominions are nothing without a metropolis. Having become independent, after the collapse of the world evil empire - they only revolve around their orbit, but not beyond it.
                Secondly - about the metropolis itself, that is, Britain itself - why did you suddenly get this, is it an independent, that is, an independent decision-making center, even in Europe, not to mention world issues? In Europe, Germany and France dictate the conditions (there is only a small, but only a fraction of the US influence), while Britain invariably uses and relies only on the support of the owners to push its interests in Europe (not to mention the world). the ocean, obeying pin dosas completely.
                1. Papakiko
                  Papakiko April 11 2013 21: 10 New
                  +2
                  Quote: rodevaan
                  olonies or dominions are nothing without a metropolis. Having become independent, after the collapse of the world evil empire - they only revolve around their orbit, but not beyond it.

                  I give you applause. bully
                  Большей необразованности и человеческой глупости и не сыскать, ну разве только вы за достойную зарплату и гранты "сороса" сеете "правду-знания" и нас "тёмных-неучей" просвящаете. good
            2. Val_y
              Val_y April 11 2013 18: 06 New
              0
              Wait a second, France of which all places were for the invasion of Libya, and now has invaded Mali ??? Go fishing or safari ??? But in the Falklands, what was Britain doing ??
        3. old rocket man
          old rocket man April 11 2013 12: 47 New
          +8
          Quote: Bronis
          Do we need to enter this fight? It seems that yes. The question of survival. Otherwise, we will become not a subject of geopolitics, but its object.


          ++++, with two hands for, Do we need to enter this fight? -Not a question, of course, but the most important thing is that the determination to conduct this fight to the end by all means is indicated, and most importantly, that the world is convinced in this determination.
          Respect is not a force in itself, but the confidence of others that this force will be inevitably used at the slightest need for its owner
          1. Jin
            Jin April 11 2013 13: 18 New
            +6
            Quote: Old Rocketman
            Respect is not a force in itself, but the confidence of others that this force will be inevitably used at the slightest need for its owner


            In the top ten! You can be strong physically, but cowardly by nature ... and then the sense of this force?
          2. Val_y
            Val_y April 11 2013 18: 08 New
            +1
            Как это не нужно, если действовать по принципу "моя хата с краю" то в конечном итоге ее отберут.
        4. Gari
          Gari April 11 2013 12: 55 New
          22
          From the history
          At first there were Mongolo-Tatars
          at the dawn of the formation of the Russian Empire of Peter the Great
          The Swedish Empire was the most powerful state at that time, in every way interfered and fought with Russia, and that Peter, the window to Europe, cut through
          was France and Napoleon conquered all of Europe, even took Moscow took
          was the persian empire, the ottoman empire
          Austrian Empire, German Empire,
          Nazi Germany again swept across Europe and stumbled near Moscow, but the British Empire occupied 1/4 of the land
          Japanese Empire


          Everyone fought with Russia, who are openly on the battlefield, who secretly or through others, were at each time the most powerful in the world.
          And what they all now represent, simple states that have lost both their territories and influence and greatness!

          Yes, over the past 20 years, of course, enemies have tried

          But Russia or the USSR Empire
          will have - apparently a historical mission is destined from above!
          1. Jin
            Jin April 11 2013 13: 20 New
            12
            Quote: Gari
            will have - apparently a historical mission is destined from above!


            smile They come and go, and we will probably stay!
            1. Papakiko
              Papakiko April 11 2013 15: 28 New
              -4
              Quote: Jin
              They come and go, and we will probably stay!

              Where did they go, Let me ask?
              They were slightly drank and sanded.
              1. Jin
                Jin April 11 2013 16: 14 New
                +5
                Quote: Papakiko
                Where did they go, Let me ask?


                They went into oblivion ... But they remained in memory forever,
                Of these, we helped many to leave, but we ourselves remain FOREVER !!!

                Россия, вперёд!!! (Я уряпатриот, без поганенькой приставки "уря") drinks
                1. Papakiko
                  Papakiko April 11 2013 19: 32 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Jin
                  But remained in my memory forever

                  In whose memory is this forever?
                  Мы помним, как деды и прадеды нагибали "Гейропецев".
                  А те помнят , что "нагибались" под физической мощью и постоянно пытались (и пытаются) нас изнутри разложить и отомстить за все "нагибы". За 20 последних лет сколько приложено усилий "гейропецев" вовложение неприязни между народами населяющие бывший СССР и Россию.
                  And how much is the demonization of Stalin !?
                  hi
                  1. Jin
                    Jin April 12 2013 18: 07 New
                    0
                    Quote: Papakiko
                    In whose memory is this forever?
                    Мы помним, как деды и прадеды нагибали "Гейропецев".
                    А те помнят , что "нагибались" под физической мощью и постоянно пытались (и пытаются) нас изнутри разложить и отомстить за все "нагибы". За 20 последних лет сколько приложено усилий "гейропецев" вовложение неприязни между народами населяющие бывший СССР и Россию.
                    And how much is the demonization of Stalin !?
                    hi


                    Here, I agree, it’s very unpleasant for these Great Powers, in fact, to argue with this, if objectively assessed, to be aware of themselves as being omitted by Russia ... so here +
                  2. Jin
                    Jin April 12 2013 18: 10 New
                    0
                    Quote: Papakiko
                    In whose memory is this forever?


                    IN OUR, dear, memory! In ours, of course, in whose else!
              2. Jin
                Jin April 11 2013 16: 17 New
                +2
                Quote: Papakiko
                They were slightly drank and sanded.


                Yeah and Napoleon and Hitler and Karl of the 12th S L E G K A SO SAWED AND GRINDED !!! They were punched hard, shell-shocked and scratched ...

                PySy scratched with large knife-paper, almost to the holes ...
            2. Darkness
              Darkness April 12 2013 03: 52 New
              +3
              1000 years stood, and still idle without damage !!!
          2. Papakiko
            Papakiko April 11 2013 15: 24 New
            +2
            Quote: Gari
            At first there were Mongolo-Tatars

            Well, why should I write this out of ignorance?
            Do you think the Yoke of the USSR?
            Небыло "ига Татаро-Монгольского".
            The Germans and the Shvedov were forgotten, and they still pretty much shkodili up to Peter 1. (Sanya Nevsky, Wonderful Lake)
            You didn’t remember about the Livonian war, and Ivan Vasilievich waged it.
            Quote: Gari
            was France and Napoleon conquered all of Europe, even took Moscow took

            The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth also took Moscow!

            Quote: Gari
            But Russia or the USSR will have an Empire — apparently a historical mission is destined from above!

            Russia Third Rome and the fourth never happen. (John Vasilievich, Rurikovich)
            1. Jin
              Jin April 11 2013 16: 29 New
              +1
              Quote: Papakiko
              The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth also took Moscow!


              Well, their semolina, right ... What's the point? Take-take, and hold? If not for what our soldiers and officers did in the summer of the 41st and the Germans would have taken! I’ll argue with anyone))) What’s the argument ... And the historical chronology, which is now to be tedious. Then whoever just didn’t play, remember the same Varangians ... The bottom line is in another IMHO
              1. Papakiko
                Papakiko April 11 2013 19: 38 New
                +1
                Quote: Jin
                What's the use of it? Take-take, but hold

                So we half of Europe surrendered without a halt together with the Baltic states and Ukraine and Crimea in addition.
            2. Nina Czerny
              Nina Czerny April 11 2013 19: 06 New
              +2
              Still, Moscow is the third Rome (and not Russia, a name that was not officially used by Ivan Vasilievich)
              1. Papakiko
                Papakiko April 11 2013 19: 19 New
                0
                Quote: Nina Cerny
                Still, Moscow is the third Rome

                Yes, yes, yes, thanks for the correction.
                Well, typically Russia-Russia and Moscow are identical. repeat
              2. Denis
                Denis April 11 2013 20: 22 New
                +2
                Quote: Nina Cerny
                Moscow - the third Rome
                It sounds gloomy. Let us recall what was mired and what killed Rome. I associate arrogance and a certain emancipation of Rome with the most democratic hamburger eaters
                1. Papakiko
                  Papakiko April 11 2013 21: 23 New
                  -1
                  Quote: Denis
                  It sounds gloomy.

                  Это усилиями "гейропецев" стало нарицательно.
                  And most importantly, the city with which the word ROME is associated is not ETERNAL or a city with a thousand-year history. He is slightly older than Moscow in age. And Erusalim, which we all know, is about three hundred years old.
                  The first ROME is the Sumerians (Baghdat).
                  The second ROME is Constantinople (Tsargrad, Yerusalim)
                  Tritium ROME Moscow.
                  And further north there is nowhere to retreat, behind Moscow.
                  1. Denis
                    Denis April 11 2013 21: 53 New
                    0
                    Quote: Papakiko
                    Tritium ROME Moscow
                    And the fourth will not happen

                    this is a personal impression, as the basis is not put forward
                  2. Vodrak
                    Vodrak April 12 2013 07: 48 New
                    0
                    Constantinople and Jerusalem are different cities.
                    Constantinople is today's Istanbul.
            3. Tverichanka
              Tverichanka April 11 2013 23: 16 New
              0
              I will take the liberty of correcting the quote. It sounds like Moscow-Third Rome, and the author is the old man Filofei.
            4. mansur
              mansur April 12 2013 00: 23 New
              +1
              Quote: Papakiko
              Well, why should I write this out of ignorance?
              Do you think the Yoke of the USSR?
              Небыло "ига Татаро-Монгольского".
              The Germans and the Shvedov were forgotten, and they still pretty much shkodili up to Peter 1. (Sanya Nevsky, Wonderful Lake)
              You didn’t remember about the Livonian war, and Ivan Vasilievich waged it.

              I know the story, let's say so good
              I didn’t write about the yoke
              I wrote referring only to empires that fought with Russia
              And the time period when Russia was the Empire
          3. Darkness
            Darkness April 12 2013 03: 54 New
            +1
            The power of Russia in it!
          4. Che
            Che April 13 2013 02: 06 New
            +1
            Who owns Eurasia owns the world. The fate of Russia to be an empire. This story repeats from generation to generation. But there are woodpeckers who sell their homeland - a troubled time before the Romanovs and now the same repeat is taking place.
        5. lubin
          lubin April 11 2013 15: 10 New
          +4
          And if you already enter the struggle, you must start with yourself. After all, RUSSIA and its position in this world depend on each of us. Well, what to hide money (and take off various benefits together) become an end in itself and many people do not care about others. People ceased to respect each other. The professions of teachers, nurses, etc. they don’t have too much honor at all. In public transport, young people will not give way to the old people and no one will say a word to them, I’m silent about the hooligans. And the youth she takes an example from the older generation and what thoughts we put into it such a power we will receive. ps Our children live after us, what will we leave them? ......
        6. Don
          Don April 11 2013 16: 46 New
          +2
          Quote: Bronis
          1. The presence of a formalized, capable, state-oriented elite (not yet, DAM and Co. confirm this).

          And what is the confirmation?
          Quote: Bronis
          3. Powerful diversified economy (10 economy in the world - not so bad, but not enough and it depends on energy production)

          Actually, according to the IMF, the 6th, and according to the World Bank, it’s the 5th. In addition, the RF is not much dependent on energy resources.
          1. Raven1972
            Raven1972 April 11 2013 19: 20 New
            -1
            Well, yes, yes ... 70% of Russia's GDP is income from the sale of resources ... For comparison, the USSR had only 8.9-12.7 %% of the same ...
            1. Don
              Don April 12 2013 12: 23 New
              0
              Quote: Raven1972
              Well, yes, yes ... 70% of Russia's GDP is income from the sale of resources ... For comparison, the USSR had only 8.9-12.7 %% of the same ...

              Where did you read such nonsense? In the sectoral structure of Russia's GDP (according to 2011 data), mining is 9,1%. The Russian Federation would not be the 6th economy of the world if 70% of its GDP were income from the sale of resources. For some reason, such countries selling their resources as Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Angola, Algeria, Iraq, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, etc. are not even among the twenty.
              1. Raven1972
                Raven1972 April 12 2013 18: 53 New
                +1
                It’s fresh tradition and hard to believe .... This is where you read such nonsense, I’m even interested ... How can it be if none of the enterprises in my city, for example, work more than 5% of their power? The same KTZ - has been breathing for a long time, but KMPO is sold out by more than 60%? And KMPO, by the way, under the USSR did GTD-1250 for the T-80 ... Where is it all? I can still list a lot .... And this is an example only in my city, far from the largest in the Russian Federation.
          2. Atash
            Atash April 12 2013 15: 47 New
            -3
            Вот возьмет нефть как бахнется в цене, долларам так скажем, к 30 (не дай Бог), вот и посмотрим как РФ не сильно зависит от углеводородов. Сразу еще один Ельцин понадобится. Когда нефть на плохих уровнях, путины-медведевы "не канают".
        7. Darkness
          Darkness April 12 2013 03: 44 New
          0
          The words are not young men, but Husband.
          Однако, я бы ввёл в круг понятий и такие вещи как: историко-политическое осознание, либо самоидентификация - как одна из высших степеней самосознания этноса. Это то, что не позволяет поддаться, ИЛИ провалить нашу и без того "мёртвую политику", в отношении САМООСОЗНАНИЯ всех!!!, всей страны!!!
          Well, and of course, those ridiculous and uncomplicated roots that we are talking about:
          "по свойски";
          ДЛЯ НАС - "по свойски", А ДЛЯ ДРУГИХ? А, пора, бы уже провести грань и накидать правила для НАС и для всех ОСТАЛЬНЫХ.
        8. politruk419
          politruk419 April 12 2013 03: 49 New
          0
          Bravo. Excellent, dry and clear analysis. The first point is quite easily corrected by the advent of a responsible, national-patriotic dictatorship. And by the methods of Joseph Vissarionovich. For two or three years.
        9. Su24
          Su24 April 13 2013 18: 52 New
          -1
          Quote: Bronis
          In order to understand whether we are a superpower, you need to make a little analysis ...



          The methodology is not bad, but it is, in fact, secondary. The most important thing is that in any case Russia is called to be the guardian of peace and order, only it has its own unique messianic fate in the heart of Eurasia.
      2. SASCHAmIXEEW
        SASCHAmIXEEW April 11 2013 10: 34 New
        +9
        Dimon is a protege of the liquidationists in RUSSIA, and in general I don’t understand how much we will endure, that foreigners, all sorts of butler’s, mendel and Chubais rule us!
      3. soaring
        soaring April 11 2013 11: 27 New
        +7
        And Dimochka could only, that for showing off a jacket in a jacket and tie for several days, a cow that had been undressed for several days, was pulled and rejoiced at the gifted iPhone like a small kid !!! lol He was the first to host the parade on May 9, even an old Brezhnev defended this ceremony to the end !!! good drinks Perhaps his small stature, this is his complex and he is trying to raise his status with his stupid, talkative .... As they say in the World of Tanks, a complete deer !!!! negative fool
      4. Batman
        Batman April 11 2013 13: 19 New
        +6
        Medvedev will remain in the history of Dimon - a narrow-minded person with narrow-minded slogans

        I agree. He even scares me sometimes in his own words and actions. Even if you compare the statistics of the reign of Medvedev and Putin, you can see a huge difference ...
        1. Atash
          Atash April 12 2013 15: 53 New
          -1
          Вы серьезно различаете правления путина и медведа? После "сальто-мортале" с "возвращением" ввп в кресло Президента?
      5. to4kavserdce
        to4kavserdce April 11 2013 13: 48 New
        +2
        handsome, I completely agree with you !! And these agents on the count am
      6. antidote
        antidote April 11 2013 14: 07 New
        +5
        I don’t agree. You can’t underestimate Medvedev. He’s a smart person, but not far-fetched, I agree. He is an obvious representative and mouthpiece of liberalism. Starikov correctly said about him. Once the amers wrote the constitution for us and the president is the guarantor of this pro-American constitution. He is a hired manager and in under this program, he acts
        1. Nina Czerny
          Nina Czerny April 11 2013 19: 08 New
          +2
          А как "умный" человек, может быть "недалеким"? В русском языке слово "недалекий" мягко обозначает человека глупого, но не полного дурака.
        2. Atash
          Atash April 12 2013 15: 59 New
          0
          Кто-то где-то тонко заметил, что ДМ-а выставляют либеральным рупором, типа ввп такой строгий, тоталитарный на радость простому народу, надежда на порядок, а дм радует глаз либералам. Старый фокус - добрый коп, злой коп. На самом деле у дм никакой власти. Ввп - подставная кукла, а дм - тот вообще картонка. "Дурилка картонная" smile
      7. UrraletZ
        UrraletZ April 11 2013 17: 57 New
        +1
        Medvedev - and a traitor in one person ... a shame on modern power ...
      8. Corsair
        Corsair April 11 2013 20: 05 New
        0
        Quote: Ghen75
        Medvedev will remain in the history of Dimon - a narrow-minded person with short-sighted slogans, often he speaks as if his language lives a separate life.
        Not all statements D.A.M need to be taken seriously laughing
      9. sso-xnumx
        sso-xnumx April 11 2013 21: 42 New
        0
        I agree completely! squalor of consciousness = wretched life
      10. rolik
        rolik April 13 2013 11: 33 New
        0
        [quote = Ghen75] will remain in history a dimon - a narrow-minded person with narrow-minded slogans, [/ quot
        Uncompetitive junior manager, misunderstood who have been steering the country for several years.
      11. xoma58
        xoma58 April 13 2013 12: 15 New
        0
        He will remain Dima - an iPhone. If in 10-15 years anyone will remember about him at all.
    2. Sirocco
      Sirocco April 11 2013 08: 54 New
      22
      And you need to start with this quote, And in the Gardens and Schools. So, at one time, literally with mother's milk, we came to understand that the country in which we were born is a truly great power, which is capable of solving even the most complex problems with a great desire. The ideological background was so solid that any doubts that arose about this could be considered from the evil one. We knew for sure that We are one sixth of the land, that We have the largest mineral reserves, that We are the most reading nation in the world, that We created the best education system on the planet, that We have two allies - the army and the fleet and that Our strength is in the friendship of nations. Oh, this DAM, sometimes his among strangers, and a stranger among his own. It would be better if he was silent than he said. Our politicians sometimes are not friends with the head. They do things with an eye to the West. The day before yesterday, the GDP in the Netherlands about Transmissions blurted out, in 10 years I’ll give them. They will say at times how they fart in the water.
    3. rainufa
      rainufa April 11 2013 09: 12 New
      64
      Together we are SUPERPOWER, and separately competitive !!!
      1. Kaa
        Kaa April 11 2013 09: 51 New
        52
        Quote: rainufa
        Together we are SUPERPOWER
        I understood and support the idea +++++++, but something colorful turns out, I'm sorry, it looks like a rainbow. Let each flag be in its capital, and in general - the good old SUPER-POWER ... if they did not respect it, they were so afraid ... good
        1. evgenm55
          evgenm55 April 11 2013 11: 19 New
          22
          FOR OUR SOVIET MOTHERLAND !!!
          1. Atlon
            Atlon April 11 2013 12: 53 New
            20
            Quote: evgenm55
            FOR OUR SOVIET MOTHERLAND !!!

            Эх, "поздняк метаться", как говорит моя жена... Вот только спросят с нас жестоко наши потомки "за нашу советскую Родину", ох как спросят! А нам и ответить будет нечего... А что ответишь? Как за сникерсы, юпи, и спирт "рояль" продали великую страну? Стыдно...
            1. evgenm55
              evgenm55 April 11 2013 14: 17 New
              +7
              But can we still rush around? By and large there is nothing to lose, and before the descendants, we can probably fix the situation. Otherwise, they will really spit when comparing with the generation of WINNERS.
            2. Kaa
              Kaa April 11 2013 17: 13 New
              +2
              Quote: Atlon
              What do you answer?
              Ответим цитатой из "17 мгновений весны"-"Пьянящий воздух свободы сыграл с профессором Плейшнером злую шутку"
        2. Natalia
          Natalia April 11 2013 12: 00 New
          13
          Quote: Kaa
          good old SUPER

          This is soooo) Already the mood has risen good smile )))
        3. Shurik34RF
          Shurik34RF April 11 2013 12: 01 New
          15
          Victory Banner Will Stay Forever
          1. Jin
            Jin April 11 2013 12: 05 New
            11
            Quote: Shurik34РФ
            Victory Banner Will Stay Forever


            + You are indisputable for us! But the sufferers rewrite history, constantly trying to wave a striped mattress there!
            1. Natalia
              Natalia April 11 2013 12: 14 New
              +9
              Quote: Jin
              constantly trying to wave a striped mattress there!

              what ...... but I wonder how it will be right with a sled mattress or a sled mattress winked
              1. Jin
                Jin April 11 2013 12: 53 New
                +6
                Quote: Natalia
                with a sled mattress or a sled mattress


                laughing I think all the same pissing!
                1. Tartary
                  Tartary April 11 2013 13: 05 New
                  11
                  Quote: Natalia
                  ...... but I wonder how it will be right with a sled mattress or a sled mattress

                  Quote: Jin
                  I think all the same pissing!


                  И все же правильно будет ссаным - без двух "н"...

                  And even better pissed, because you can combine two tenses - past and present ...
                  1. Jin
                    Jin April 11 2013 13: 24 New
                    +5
                    Quote: Tartary
                    И все же правильно будет ссаным - без двух "н"...

                    And even better pissed, because you can combine two tenses - past and present ...

                    laughing just a class !!!
                  2. Atash
                    Atash April 12 2013 16: 07 New
                    -2
                    А "засанным" уже по-моему наоборот: одно "с", два "н". Нет наречия "сан", есть (или может быть) "засан".
                2. Natalia
                  Natalia April 11 2013 13: 45 New
                  +8
                  Quote: Jin
                  I think all the same pissing!

                  Better yet pissed

                  winked lol laughing
              2. Atlon
                Atlon April 11 2013 13: 46 New
                +5
                Quote: Natalia
                .a here is interesting how it will be right with a sled mattress or a sled mattress

                sTsanym laughing
              3. rodevaan
                rodevaan April 11 2013 19: 56 New
                -2
                Quote: Natalia
                Quote: Jin
                constantly trying to wave a striped mattress there!

                what ...... but I wonder how it will be right with a sled mattress or a sled mattress winked


                - Ayaya-yayay! Do not be ashamed to ask this, huh? Grade 5 Russian language lessons!
          2. does it
            does it April 11 2013 13: 05 New
            +8
            Quote: Shurik34РФ
            Victory Banner Will Stay Forever

            Sacred Banner of Victory ...
        4. matross
          matross April 11 2013 12: 44 New
          +7
          Definitely! This is OUR flag !!
          PS About the rainbow - it's funny. Pun on 5 Points good
        5. builder74
          builder74 April 11 2013 18: 54 New
          +2
          Exactly! good And the coat of arms!
        6. Atash
          Atash April 12 2013 16: 02 New
          +1
          Why not respected? Respected.
      2. Val_y
        Val_y April 11 2013 18: 15 New
        +3
        Oh, I can’t wait, damn my godparents in Leningrad, cousins ​​in Moscow, a bunch of relatives in Brest, and myself in Odessa. My wife, also relatives, in Rostov the Great and Gelendzhik. Eh .....
      3. Lissyara
        Lissyara April 18 2013 00: 08 New
        +1
        Uh Comrade officers! Caucasus forgotten!
        Where is Armenia with our air defense group?
    4. vadimus
      vadimus April 11 2013 09: 17 New
      13
      Dima iPhone was far from being an authority. And we are already getting up from our knees and this is what we are afraid of!
      1. JonnyT
        JonnyT April 11 2013 09: 31 New
        +9
        Yes, such a thing, Dvorkovich whispered a text to him in his ear, and he blurted out without thinking!)))
        The same when the guard tells the merchant that he is a wimp!
        The status of a superpower is a guarantee of stability in partnerships! Everyone wants to be friends with the strong and beautiful, smart. Weak and faint-hearted people beat and scoff at them.
        Let everyone think what he wants. Personally, I live in a great strong country, rich both culturally and resourcefully. And the leadership like the Humpbacked and the Bear would not have sat long ago the whole planet would have called us a superpower!
        1. Natalia
          Natalia April 11 2013 09: 49 New
          24
          Не слушайте Медведа, он не медвед он Олень. Это называется: "Забери себя олень в свою страну олению"...чтоб мы тя не видели.
          Because Russia claims to be the HYPERPOWER!
          1. Sirocco
            Sirocco April 11 2013 10: 24 New
            13
            Quote: Natalia
            Do not listen to the Bear, he is not a bear he is a deer

            As said !!!! Smiled drinks
    5. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets April 11 2013 09: 36 New
      24
      Quote: Romn
      WE ARE SUPERPOWER!

      And I do not like the SUPER- prefix, it carries it by some McDonald's, we are HOLD, this is in Russian.
      1. krest.ros
        krest.ros April 11 2013 09: 48 New
        10
        We are the Russian Power of the Orthodox Slavic world.
        1. Natalia
          Natalia April 11 2013 11: 16 New
          12
          Quote: krest.ros
          We are the Russian Power of the Orthodox Slavic world.

          We are not only Russian Power and not only Slavic Orthodox... sorry for the remark ... no offense well, honestly.
          The Russian Federation is multinational the state, the USSR was the same.
          It's just that for Russia this is a very sensitive topic, and attention should be paid to such statements.
          .... for other nations and nations professing other religions (which are part of Russia) can be offended, and rightfully .... because other nations also contribute to the development of our common MOTHERLAND.
          1. krest.ros
            krest.ros April 11 2013 14: 26 New
            +2
            And who claims the opposite? Where there are insults, just a statement of fact. Without the Russian people (Great Russians, Little Russians, Belorussians), no nation in Russia will survive. While the Russian people do not respect themselves, no one respects them. The Russian people saving themselves will save others. Make (which is unlikely to succeed), taking into account the views of national minorities, capacious corrections understandable to everyone in this slogan, without abstract broad explanations. The Russian Power is a broad concept where everything, including national and religious contradictions, can harmoniously fit in. The Lord will rule everything with a competent consideration of this issue.
            1. Natalia
              Natalia April 11 2013 16: 45 New
              +4
              Quote: krest.ros
              Without the Russian people (Great Russians, Little Russians, Belorussians), no nation in Russia will survive.

              Российская Федерация - это многонациональное государство, если мы будем уважать только самих себя (русских) то Российская Федерация перестанет быть таковой...вы меня конечно уж извините но это факт. Уважать надо все народы и национальности входящие в состав РФ. Только так и не как иначе. Нельзя ни в коем случае разыгрывать национальную карту, это ключ к развалу Российской Федерации. Терпимость и взаимоуважение друг к другу, только так....если будем восклицать: " А мы тут самые самые" то мы будем самыми самыми, но уже в меньших масштабах и размерах.
              P.E. I ask you, DO NOT put national dynamite under the foundation of the Russian Federation.
              1. Tverichanka
                Tverichanka April 11 2013 23: 29 New
                +1
                Quote: Natalia
                P.E. I ask you, DO NOT put national dynamite under the foundation of the Russian Federation

                Вы безусловно правы.Ни в коем случае нельзя ни на какой почве нам разъединяться.Пусть каждый верит во что хочет,разделение может идти только по меркам-"хороший"или "плохой"человек.Среди нас,русских по крови,тоже всяких хватает-и воров,и насильников,и бандитов........
                1. krest.ros
                  krest.ros April 12 2013 00: 58 New
                  -1
                  As soon as you say two good words in favor of the Russians, a bunch of dead, tolerant dogs are hung on you right away.
                  1. Natalia
                    Natalia April 12 2013 09: 40 New
                    0
                    Quote: krest.ros
                    As soon as you say two good words in favor of the Russians, a bunch of dead, tolerant dogs are hung on you right away.

                    And because you need to think what kind of language to speak, you probably do not live in Moldova but in the Russian Federation. And the Russian Federation - ..... it is a multinational state .... I'm tired of repeating this to you ....
              2. Atash
                Atash April 12 2013 17: 05 New
                +1
                We are pleased to read such comments from the near abroad, there are thinking people in Russia. Literally today, Pravda.ru about Baikonur sniffed such a chauvinistic stench. After all, it is the chauvinists who destroy the empire. Ironically, your namesake excelled.
          2. M. Peter
            M. Peter April 12 2013 05: 02 New
            +4
            Quote: Natalia
            We are not only a Russian Power and not only a Slavic Orthodox ... sorry for the remark ... no offense, well, honestly. The Russian Federation is a multinational state, the USSR was the same.

            Для меня есть два понятия "русский". Есть русский по национальности, а есть русский человек. И главное тут не национанальность, а человек.
            Россия это не страна русских по национальности, это страна "русского человека", любой армянин, грузин, чеченец, бурят, татарин точно такие же русские люди. Россия за 20 лет сократилась, отдала свои теретории врагам на растерзание. Наших братьев перевоспитывают против нас же. Пытпються перевоспитать и нас, сделать Россию страной сугубо уже русской национальности, а это путь в никуда, путь в маленькую задрапёжную гейропу. Это не для нас. Мы сверхдержава! Пришло время собирать камни.
            1. Jin
              Jin April 12 2013 18: 18 New
              +3
              Quote: M.Pyotr
              Россия это не страна русских по национальности, это страна "русского человека", любой армянин, грузин, чеченец, бурят, татарин точно такие же русские люди. Россия за 20 лет сократилась, отдала свои теретории врагам на растерзание. Наших братьев перевоспитывают против нас же.


              + Yes, it is. Let's guess, from three times, who needs it !!! drinks
        2. Vasya Ivanov
          Vasya Ivanov April 11 2013 14: 20 New
          +3
          Мы СУПЕРДЕРЖАВА. Сначала мы это должны сами осознать, с гордостью в любой стране мира произносить имя своей страны, просыпаться с радостью, что я родился и живу в России и детей своих научить этому-любить свою Великую родину. Что-бы не говорили некоторые "товарищи" которые ими не являются, Россия всегда будет ВЕЛИКОЙ и дело здесь не размерах, а в силе духа.
      2. Vrungel78
        Vrungel78 April 11 2013 10: 13 New
        10
        You can say TOP. The main thing is that this reflects our ambitions. And Mr. Medvedev is a paradox: the surname is strong, Russian, and the inside doesn't match.
        1. Atlon
          Atlon April 11 2013 12: 42 New
          +2
          Quote: Vrungel78
          And Mr. Medvedev is a paradox: the surname is strong, Russian, and the inside doesn't match.

          А мне кажется (чисто ИМХО), у Медведева своя сакральная роль в "тандеме". А именно: добрый следователь - злой следователь. Путин игрок, и игрок тонкий. Запад и финансовая мировая элита противник ОЧЕНЬ опасный и могущественный. Наскоком не взять. Вспомните Кеннеди, который собрался отобрать печатный станок у ФРС, Каддафи который мечтал о золотом динаре, Патрис Лулумба (борьба против колониализма за независимость). Фамилий много...
          А посему Путин и не спешит. Убрать президента любой страны, не так уж трудно... Медведев, как бы "усыпляет" бдительность запада.
          1. Corsair
            Corsair April 11 2013 20: 15 New
            +4
            Quote: Atlon
            Медведев, как бы "усыпляет" бдительность запада.

            And GDP periodically pulls him so that he does not fall asleep ... lol
          2. Atash
            Atash April 12 2013 17: 26 New
            0
            Domestic liberals vigilance, he puts to sleep. Nobody in the West respects them, just do not want to give a reason to raise gas prices, and hydrocarbons are so expensive. But Putin himself had forgotten that he was fake. He thinks that if he is so educated, he can manage Russia. His people are not afraid of him, but of those who stand behind him. The mind without action turns into a salon chatter, which it masquerades with rudeness. Mind alone is not enough, you need to love your homeland. If you love your homeland, you will not stay in Sochi to rest when the submariners die in the Barents Sea.
            1. Denis
              Denis April 12 2013 19: 43 New
              +2
              Quote: Atash
              If you love your homeland, you will not stay in Sochi to relax when submariners die in the Barents Sea
              He has enough jambs, I’m not defending him, but he had nothing to do there. Just like with other accidents. Is he a lifeguard, a diver or a medic, or could he give advice on the case? And how many people would engage in a meeting, rather than a deed, don’t you know?
              Nefig in the trench to the general do, each in its place should be
              1. Atash
                Atash 4 May 2013 09: 57 New
                +1
                He could, for example, call the English rescue ship that day, which admirals could not call in any way. It came out only a few days after the British offered help. It’s just that the person himself must have a concern, whether everything is done right there, whether competent people manage salvation. There was a mess there for sure. The first person’s arrival would morally mobilize, because people have a shock and panic there. After all, it’s not necessary to come with pomp, for the technical organization of a trip, a meeting, there will not be anything in Moscow to send people. In any case, do not stay in Sochi, at least go to Moscow right there. And it probably didn’t occur to me. They come to the Russia-Germany football match, although not football players. And there they just prevented, caught up on the jungle additionally.
                Do you remember that Yeltsin rested somewhere every year? In my opinion, he didn’t allow himself more than a hospital bed.
                Marshal Zhukov soldiers knew by sight, without TV.
        2. Atash
          Atash April 12 2013 17: 16 New
          -2
          Нет парадокса. На самом деле нет русских с фамилией Медведев. Это фамилия церковного делопроизводства, так скажем. Одного ряда с фамилиями Дмитриев, Тарасов. Вроде чисто по-русски, но я не видел ни одного русского с такими фамилиями. Однажды, давно хотел этим поделиться, в "Комсомольской правде", еще в самом начале путинского правления, проскочило отчество тестя ввп. Вы, наверное, сильно удивитесь. Я не имею ничего особо против национальности обладателей таких фамилий, но эта парочка во главе Российского государства - суть эпохи: Ложь.
      3. Atlon
        Atlon April 11 2013 10: 15 New
        18
        Quote: Vladimirets
        And I do not like the SUPER- prefix, it carries it by some McDonald's, we are HOLD, this is in Russian.

        Correctly! Ftopku of Anglicism! Russia is a superpower!
      4. seed
        seed April 11 2013 10: 44 New
        +3
        Usually they said SUPERPOWER, referring to the USSR or the USA.
        1. Natalia
          Natalia April 11 2013 11: 35 New
          +6
          Quote: seed
          Usually they said SUPERPOWER, referring to the USSR or the USA.

          absolutely right ... and now there is no time United then still States on that moment America - this is a semi-regional altcontrol Derzhava .... for a sequestration with an overheated printing press (switching to sour-milk, as a result of a sharp softening of the chair) ... well, it doesn’t matter ....
          And Russia, as the comrades correctly noted, is SUPERPOWER.
      5. Jin
        Jin April 11 2013 11: 43 New
        +7
        Quote: Vladimirets
        And I do not like the SUPER- prefix, it carries it by some McDonald's, we are HOLD, this is in Russian.


        Yes, there is such a moment! I also always liked the Russian Empire! Fundamentally, how!
      6. Papakiko
        Papakiko April 11 2013 15: 31 New
        +1
        Quote: Vladimirets
        And I do not like the SUPER- prefix, it carries it by some McDonald's, we are HOLD, this is in Russian.

        Yes Eugene, yes. Yes, yes, yes, yes!
    6. treskoed
      treskoed April 11 2013 09: 44 New
      +8
      SUPERPOWER, this is when her people - EVERYTHING SUPER !!!!
    7. evgenii67
      evgenii67 April 11 2013 09: 46 New
      +1
      We are SUPERPOWER there is no dispute, but we are not competitive in the foreign market, except for raw materials and military products.
      1. Jin
        Jin April 11 2013 11: 52 New
        +4
        Quote: evgenii67
        except for raw materials and military products.


        Here it is! This is already a lot! We come out on the second place in the world in sales of weapons, since the time of the Union this was not. But to argue with you is difficult, in many areas we have a full tryndets ...
    8. Andrey57
      Andrey57 April 11 2013 10: 31 New
      +5
      What can you expect from the stupid Aifonchik - u-r-o-d, one word!
      1. Alexander
        Alexander April 11 2013 10: 34 New
        +5
        We are a Superpower, and Medvedev is the second Gorbachev. It's my opinion.
        1. Corsair
          Corsair April 11 2013 20: 23 New
          0
          Quote: Alexander
          We are a Superpower, and Medvedev is the second Gorbachev.
          And even so, but unlike Gorbi, the iPhone has a powerful counterweight. wink
    9. FED
      FED April 11 2013 10: 58 New
      +3
      How we were weaned from the fact that Russia is a superpower, .... 4 billion dollars. every four months (NPOs), Nemtsovs, Navalny, Kasparov ...... Rain (TV channel) this TV channel when it was the anniversary of the Battle of Stalingrad did not release a single story in memory of this greatest event in world history, but only discussed and criticized about renaming Leningrad to Stalingrad, no words ......
      1. Jin
        Jin April 11 2013 11: 54 New
        +4
        Quote: FED
        Leningrad to Stalingrad


        Kolega, Volgograd to Stalingrad hi
    10. iliq
      iliq April 11 2013 12: 35 New
      -8
      a country with a population of 140 million cannot be a superpower by definition ...
      1. Jin
        Jin April 11 2013 12: 52 New
        +6
        Quote: iliq
        a country with a population of 140 million cannot be a superpower by definition ...


        By some such definition, dear, and who defined this? Nonsense is complete ... bullshit incredible just!
    11. Vasya Ivanov
      Vasya Ivanov April 11 2013 14: 16 New
      +1
      Quote: Romn
      WE ARE SUPERPOWER!

      Сначала мы это должны сами осознать, с гордостью в любой стране мира произносить имя своей страны, просыпаться с радостью, что я родился и живу в России и детей своих научить этому-любить свою Великую родину. Что-бы не говорили некоторые "товарищи" которые ими не являются, Россия всегда будет ВЕЛИКОЙ и дело здесь не размерах, а в силе духа.
    12. ramzes1776
      ramzes1776 April 11 2013 16: 07 New
      +3
      I have said and will continue to say that Comrade Medvedev, with such thinking, is in no position to be in such key positions. Maximum Ambassador to Africa.
      1. Jin
        Jin April 11 2013 19: 08 New
        0
        Quote: ramzes1776
        ovary Medvedev


        Yes, not a friend drinks he is our colleague ...
    13. SlavakharitonoV
      SlavakharitonoV April 14 2013 18: 16 New
      0
      And Medvedev is a liberal goat-hunter.
    14. Quiet
      Quiet April 17 2013 21: 23 New
      0
      WE ARE SUPERPOWER!

      And I printed the photo and hung it at work !!! fellow Youngsters look - they are coughing and asking a bunch of amateurish questions ... Sorry for them - the lost generation. Naive as children, though exceeded 25 !!!!
  2. FC SKIF
    FC SKIF April 11 2013 08: 36 New
    17
    Россия может быть только Супердержавой, а то иначе разорвут. 20 мы были "одними из" и еще не известно, чем все закончится.
  3. Iraclius
    Iraclius April 11 2013 08: 37 New
    21
    So that Mr. Medvedev would not think to himself there (and does he think at all ?!), but personally, I both felt and feel like a resident of the Superpower. Yes, large territories have been lost, and many social problems. We need to solve them and hope for the best, work hard ...
    In the end, Sovereignty - it is in the soul, and not in the territories. They can always be returned back.
    1. Apollo
      Apollo April 11 2013 08: 52 New
      66
      Quote: Iraclius
      So that Mr. Medvedev would not think to himself there (and does he think at all ?!),



      No comments laughing
      1. Iraclius
        Iraclius April 11 2013 09: 49 New
        +6
        Про пятого Министра иностранных дел Российской империи Карла Васильевича Нессельроде говорили "политический пигмей, он был и пигмеем мысли", тонко намекая не только на карликовый рост, но и на его малодушные черты, как политика.
        The statement applies fully to Medvedev. good
      2. nikolas 83
        nikolas 83 April 11 2013 12: 37 New
        +1
        Ah well done !!!! lol
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov April 11 2013 09: 12 New
      13
      Quote: Iraclius
      So that Mr. Medvedev would not think to himself there

      As far as I remember, Medvedev had a slightly different view, saying that Russia does not claim to be a superpower. The world now has a steady opinion that a superpower dictates its rules to the whole world, unleashes warriors, and sets up bases around the world, as the United States does. Russia is a great country and will remain one, but to solve world troubles through warrior and dictatorship, even if the US is steeped in debt, they continue to consider such a thing. Russia has its own development path for many countries, and therefore similar questions arise. Respect should be towards other countries (mutual respect), the only way to achieve respect for their own country.
      1. Iraclius
        Iraclius April 11 2013 09: 27 New
        11
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        As far as I remember, Medvedev meant somewhat different, saying that Russia does not claim to be a superpower.

        This could be said in other words, without introducing into a stupor the Indian partners and citizens of their own country. We are a peace-loving Superpower, advocating peaceful coexistence.
      2. Vrungel78
        Vrungel78 April 11 2013 10: 23 New
        +5
        Ну да, вырвано из контекста. Но глазами недоброжелателей моей Родины видно, как написано. Я своему ребенку всегда говорю: "Подумай,прежде чем сказать". Вот и Медведеву тоже думать чаще надо. Может он ничего плохого и не хотел сказать, но вышло , что вышло. А теперь ему хорошо бы подумать, как это исправить. Хотя бы потому, что мы, народ, несогласны. Получается, что мы гордимся больше своей страной, чем он. Я же говорю, парадокс.
        1. Andrey57
          Andrey57 April 11 2013 10: 41 New
          +4
          Чтобы думать, необходимо ещё и "думалку" иметь, а, кроме того, нужно ещё и "государевым человеком" быть - ставить на первом месте интересы своей страны и своего народа, не населения, а именно народа - тех кто народился в великой стране, разорванной пока на части. hi
        2. Atash
          Atash April 12 2013 17: 33 New
          0
          In his position, in any case, one must choose expressions, calculating the options for interpretation. The first face of the empire, after all. To keep silent is better, but not to allow such options.
    3. Nagaibak
      Nagaibak April 11 2013 09: 16 New
      +1
      Iraclius"Чтобы господин Медведев там себе не думал (да и думает ли он вообще?!)."
      It would not hurt to think with his head!
  4. Vrungel78
    Vrungel78 April 11 2013 08: 40 New
    18
    Dmitry Medvedev (the then president of Russia), while giving a lecture within the walls of the Indian Institute of Technology, unexpectedly for many stated that the Russian Federation does not claim to be a superpower.
    Mr. Medvedev. You do not express the will of the people. You're fired.
    1. Apollo
      Apollo April 11 2013 09: 16 New
      35
      Quote: Vrungel78
      Mr. Medvedev. You do not express the will of the people. You're fired.


      No comments laughing
      1. nikolas 83
        nikolas 83 April 11 2013 12: 45 New
        +2
        If he is compared with Gorbachev? Then he must be the president of the United States. Let corruption spread there and ruin the budget. lol
      2. Corsair
        Corsair April 11 2013 20: 34 New
        +3
        Quote from the demotivator:LOOKING FOR WORK 4 year experience. Belarus does not offer. Will you take up Ukraine? Works are a lot of land, only EVERYTHING will fall on my own, without a mentor ... wink
    2. Vrungel78
      Vrungel78 April 12 2013 10: 09 New
      0
      And minus set me Medvedev?
      1. Kahlan amnell
        Kahlan amnell April 12 2013 16: 55 New
        0
        Here, many who spoke impartially about Medvedev were exposed cons. Apparently, the intruder showed up. smile
  5. Ostanin
    Ostanin April 11 2013 08: 41 New
    16
    "Мы точно знали, что Мы – одна шестая часть суши, что у Нас самые большие запасы полезных ископаемых, что Мы – самая читающая нация в мире, что Мы создали самую лучшую на планете систему образования, что у Нас есть два союзника – армия и флот, и что Наша сила в дружбе народов" - Спрашивается зачем всё разрушали, если снова к этому стремимся?
    1. Jin
      Jin April 11 2013 09: 12 New
      +9
      Quote: Ostanin
      The question is, why did they destroy everything, if we strive for this again?


      Потому что было огромное количество "помошников" и "доброжелателей"... Я как-то проснулся в среду в 5 с чем то, с бодуна, включил телек, а там передача...ммм... Момент истины, что ли, не помню... короче там жёсткий такой журналист, задаёт очень жёсткие вопросы чинушам и большим чинам....мляяяя! там про эпоху ЕБНа как раз говорили, я чуть с ума не сошёл!!! КОШМАР что этот ирод вытворял! Это не было конечно, особой новостью, но вот подробности! они меня ужаснули...
      1. cerko
        cerko April 11 2013 09: 35 New
        +9
        showed at 5 in the morning that fewer people watched
        1. Jin
          Jin April 11 2013 09: 42 New
          0
          Quote: cerko
          showed at 5 in the morning that fewer people watched


          It may be, by the way !!! what somehow did not think about it ...
          1. Tverichanka
            Tverichanka April 11 2013 23: 44 New
            +1
            Программа "Момент истины" выходит на Питерском канале каждый понедельник в 23-10.Очень неплохая.
      2. Ostanin
        Ostanin April 11 2013 10: 58 New
        +3
        I wonder why this journalist Andrei Karaulov has not yet been trapped somewhere in a dark alley. Such things are told that the hair is on end and depressed then. In general, in our country everyone understands everything, but for some reason no one does anything, I'm talking about power. The state lives separately from the people in its own world and with its own interests, which diverge from the interests of the people.
        1. Jin
          Jin April 11 2013 13: 51 New
          0
          Quote: Ostanin
          I wonder why this journalist Andrei Karaulov has not yet been trapped somewhere in a dark alley. Such things are told that the hair is on end and depressed then. In general, in our country everyone understands everything, but for some reason no one does anything, I'm talking about power. The state lives separately from the people in its own world and with its own interests, which diverge from the interests of the people.


          Thank you, now at least I know the name of this brave man! Yes, the programs are tough ... I wrote for good reason that I was with a hangover, in that state I generally precipitated ...
    2. evgenm55
      evgenm55 April 11 2013 09: 25 New
      +9
      Then they destroyed it in order to shove us into shit, to make an Saxon appendage. Without the Motherland, without History, without the future ... And if the Americans can be understood, enemies are enemies, then I do not want to understand our creatures. Betrayal and meanness at all times in all countries (regardless of system and religion) it was punished in different ways, but with the same result - DEATH. And, so far, my people will not rid their homeland from a bunch of these creatures who consider themselves GODS - we will not have anything good.
  6. Denis
    Denis April 11 2013 08: 45 New
    13
    At one time (December 2010), Dmitry Medvedev (the then president of Russia), while giving a lecture at the walls of the Indian Institute of Technology, unexpectedly for many stated that the Russian Federation did not claim to be a superpower
    N-yes ... even the head with a patch when he scribbled about loans around the world, it didn’t go down
    DIM, on the other hand, saw life, it wasn’t in the magazine that shit was brought up. Was it possible to thoroughly bring up the country? Shkolot didn’t listen to life like this before, Stalinism and stagnation. Although no one answers the question of which family suffered from Stalin, they don’t believe all kinds of free mugs, uniforms or bicycles that were issued in sports sections.
    Yes, he played with an iPhone
  7. svp67
    svp67 April 11 2013 08: 51 New
    12
    Медведев, это Горбачев нашего времени,не будь он под "колпаком" ой много чего, в угоду Запада сотворил бы. Пора уже ВВП в графе "бывшие" после фамилии Сердюков записать Медведьев...
    1. paunch
      paunch April 11 2013 08: 53 New
      +3
      а разве Сердюков уже "бывший"? :)
  8. paunch
    paunch April 11 2013 08: 51 New
    0
    the question is wrong. Russia is not a superpower. Russia is a drop dead big country that cannot afford not to protect its borders and interests.
  9. sergo0000
    sergo0000 April 11 2013 08: 57 New
    11
    Thank you for the article to Alexei. It seems to me personally that we will not be able to return everything that was lost in the near future, but in the future I think we will catch up and increase! You can’t enter the same river twice. If the system fell, it means it was weak! We now have to a less difficult task than our parents living and creating the USSR is to build a new country! Thank God there is a hurt and experience of the past socialist years.
    In the early years of the Soviet Republic, our ancestors, sometimes at the limit of human power, managed to build what they thought a free and fair state. And only time showed all its flaws and pitfalls in the process of its existence. It’s a sin to conceal and merit in the vitality of this society, sometimes it was determined by the presence of smart and talented personalities in the leadership. That is, this society depended on the head of its head! We now need to find a form of fair organization of the state institution (the other Russian spirit does not accept) that could exist independently of individuals standing on higher state post !!!
    И если открыть глаза можно увидеть ,что поиски в самом разгаре .Может я лично и не всё вижу,но допустим создание "Народного фронта","Изборского клуба-и есть тот первый шаг к построению нами же другого,более живучего образования!
    "Мы наш,мы новый мир построим!"
    Only now we had to work up like our ancestors. And they were a hundred times harder, because they created the USSR from scratch!
    1. old rocket man
      old rocket man April 11 2013 13: 10 New
      +3
      Quote: sergo0000
      It seems to me personally that we will not be able to return all that was lost in the near future,


      Of course we can’t.
      And we don’t have to. To position ourselves as a great power in the consciousness of the whole world, and not just our own, we must revive the industry to such an extent that the state is functioning in complete economic isolation, at least for several years. The task, as Lenin said archi difficult but not impossible
  10. Brummbar
    Brummbar April 11 2013 08: 59 New
    +3
    Медведев - это новый Горбачёв . А почему он всё ещё пред.правительсва? ,но вероятно по принцыпу держи врагов близко а "друзей" ещё ближе.
    1. paunch
      paunch April 11 2013 09: 02 New
      +3
      Volodin - well done. Definitely.
      а после Медведева появится новый "Горбачёв".
      Why not? We choose and endure.
      1. Jin
        Jin April 11 2013 09: 21 New
        +1
        Quote: paunch
        Why not? We choose and endure.


        Do we have a special choice? everything is done for show, but they choose everything for us ... and whoever doesn’t agree on the bunk is the GDP policy. I admit, he removed a lot of * ram from power, the Gusinsky ones are Berezovsky, but! they disturbed him first of all !!! I can’t say that Putin is bad around, but in some matters he’s clearly going too far! and Mr. Medvedev, this is another Putin jamb! I didn’t think that he would leave such a bunch in the whole world! We laughed and cried from the heart !!!
        1. paunch
          paunch April 11 2013 09: 26 New
          0
          Totally agree with you.
          just a question - And Cho? AND CHO NOW TO DO THAT ???
          1. Jin
            Jin April 11 2013 09: 35 New
            +4
            Quote: paunch
            AND WHAT? AND CHO NOW TO DO THAT ???


            Good, very good question! Unfortunately, I do not have a ready-made answer! Rather, it exists, but Putin enacted such laws, in confirmation of, by the way, my previous post, that if I write now, tomorrow my uncles in short jackets can roll me up! Like I call for extremism smile and ... on the bunk !!!
            1. paunch
              paunch April 11 2013 09: 38 New
              +2
              I shake my hand, colleague!
              1. Jin
                Jin April 11 2013 09: 44 New
                0
                Quote: paunch
                I shake my hand, colleague!


                Mutually!
                1. paunch
                  paunch April 11 2013 09: 50 New
                  0
                  I have been reading topvar for 4 years. but registered only today. do you have a personal? How to write in it?
                  1. paunch
                    paunch April 11 2013 09: 51 New
                    0
                    I promise no reason for short jackets :)
                    1. Jin
                      Jin April 11 2013 10: 03 New
                      +1
                      Quote: paunch
                      I promise no reason for short jackets :)


                      did not have time to answer) Alexander got ahead))) at work, you also have to work laughing Write!
                  2. Alexander Romanov
                    Alexander Romanov April 11 2013 09: 55 New
                    +2
                    Quote: paunch
                    . do you have a personal? How to write in it?

                    Нажмите на ник посетителя,которому хотите написать,там будет окно "отправить сообщение" остальное все как везде hi
                    1. Jin
                      Jin April 11 2013 10: 24 New
                      +1
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Quote: paunch
                      . do you have a personal? How to write in it?

                      Нажмите на ник посетителя,которому хотите написать,там будет окно "отправить сообщение" остальное все как везде hi


                      Alexander, a question for you! How long will it take me to launch a page header after each comment, like a rocket? smile Please do as before, there is no strength already)))
                      1. Yarbay
                        Yarbay April 11 2013 11: 40 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Jin

                        Alexander, a question for you! How long will it take me to launch a page header after each comment, like a rocket? Please do as before, there is no strength already)))


                        Killed))))))))))))))))
                        I remembered how in * Mimino * -GAI here does not respect us at all)))))))))
                      2. Jin
                        Jin April 11 2013 11: 59 New
                        +2
                        Quote: Yarbay
                        Killed))))))))))))))))
                        I remembered how in * Mimino * -GAI here does not respect us at all)))))))))


                        Hello my friend! Appreciated? smile
  • Mitek
    Mitek April 11 2013 09: 01 New
    10
    Quote: Romn
    WE ARE SUPERPOWER!

    Right! And the iPhone he is the iPhone .. here recently he was offended by the fact that he is called a dimon on the network ... Now he is Nedimon)))) A stingy nano-iPhone player Mlyn)
    1. Jin
      Jin April 11 2013 09: 27 New
      +8
      Quote: Mitek
      Detective nano-IPhone player Mlyn)


      Dimon does not want, there will be POCEMON! such a little animal integrated with gadgets, and widgets in gadgets! cool! laughing and this is the prime minister ... I wanted to write ours, not ours, but, unfortunately, our country)))
      1. Jin
        Jin April 11 2013 10: 14 New
        +6
        I also remember with what kind of physics he fired Kudrina, like an offended child whose iPhone was taken smile By the way, Kudrin did not blaze then and said bluntly that Medvedev was a dolt and where he was going to take 20 trillion to the defense industry and at the expense of whom he was going to raise a salary by the military? No, of course I support this course! But, we again did everything through * opu ... and then also stole a bit))) The stool, it’s also Medvedev’s sidekick !!! because it doesn’t sit and sit and don’t give back money ... bad! Two you Dmitry Anatolyevich!
    2. Raven1972
      Raven1972 April 11 2013 19: 50 New
      +1
      A STOVATNYNANOIFON - is such a musical instrument? Wow))) But I didn’t know)))) A new word in music ... laughing laughing laughing
      Concert for nano iPhone with orchestra ... good laughing LOL
  • rainufa
    rainufa April 11 2013 09: 01 New
    0
    Together - we are force!
  • Was mammoth
    Was mammoth April 11 2013 09: 06 New
    +2
    Quote: Brummbar
    And why is he still the pre-government?

    Good question. To Putin.
    1. paunch
      paunch April 11 2013 09: 19 New
      0
      wrong address.
      US question.
      1. Jin
        Jin April 11 2013 12: 40 New
        +1
        Quote: paunch
        US question.


        Of course to us ... but returning to our rams, go and pick it up from there! Now it is only uprooted, this weed, and the root of the hoo!
  • Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 April 11 2013 09: 11 New
    +7
    Great country is inhabited by powerful people. That is, if it’s an inflatable bubble pumped up by stolen, it can be Americans, but if it’s for real ... And this is what our authorities are afraid of. To hysteria, to squeal of a pig. All these grimaces are an attempt to somehow make a strong country ... without strong people. And God forbid, turn to these terrible Russians! Let the Russian power continue to crumble under the press, sort of like a Russian state, if only this Russian, hated, doesn’t add a grain of power. Because if the Russians feel in their hands and heart the Russian Power, the country will rise instantly. In a matter of years ... that's just the majority of our leaders ... well, you understand.
    Damn, what is it like Putin is actually alone ...
  • tarks
    tarks April 11 2013 09: 14 New
    +3
    But do not give a scarf to Medvedev?
    1. Jin
      Jin April 11 2013 10: 18 New
      +2
      Quote: tarks
      But do not give a scarf to Medvedev?


      Better tie and what Sicilian!
      1. Corsair5912
        Corsair5912 April 11 2013 11: 33 New
        +3
        Stolypin’s tie Dima will be exactly in suit, he is a reformer and liberalist.
        1. Jin
          Jin April 11 2013 12: 50 New
          +2
          Quote: Corsair5912
          reformer and liberalist


          Деформатор и копипаст!!!! они задолбали загонять и затачивать Россию под, тьфу,корёбит от этого слова, писать не хочу, "евростандарт"! не работают у нас их ценности толерастские! Это смешно!!! Когда так происходит, над нами смеются! Неужели нам отсюда, снизу, это виднее, чем им с их высоких трибун?!
    2. Raven1972
      Raven1972 April 11 2013 19: 58 New
      +1
      Such a narrow narrow nylon, the cord is called))) good laughing hi
  • tarks
    tarks April 11 2013 09: 14 New
    0
    But do not give a scarf to Medvedev?
    1. paunch
      paunch April 11 2013 09: 20 New
      0
      on milksnetcher he does not pull :)
      1. tarks
        tarks April 11 2013 09: 31 New
        +1
        Berezovsky helped ...
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 11 2013 09: 56 New
          +8
          Quote: tarks
          Berezovsky helped ...

          Berezovsky helped!
  • Algor73
    Algor73 April 11 2013 09: 22 New
    +6
    The status of a superpower is not determined by the statements of politicians, it is determined by nature. There are two such superpowers in the world - Russia and the USA. The first also has the potential for a sharp leap forward, the second - the prerequisites for stomping on the spot. This is due to geopolitics, and the economy, and many others. Neither China (even though it is developing very rapidly), neither India, nor other countries reach such statuses.
  • spymaster
    spymaster April 11 2013 09: 27 New
    +3
    I am for a superpower.
    And therefore, as great people said, to work, work and work again - and on myself, including ... which I’m actually doing.
  • SCS
    SCS April 11 2013 09: 27 New
    +4
    We were weaned from the fact that Russia is a superpower and nothing did come of these teachers and will not work! history is a confirmation of this and respect We have not stopped ourselves, we are not stopping and we will not stop! hi
  • Begemot
    Begemot April 11 2013 09: 28 New
    +6
    Well, you attacked DAM.
    Medvedev reflected his own vision of the situation. If a country has such a president (at that time), then it cannot claim to be a great one. Is he not right?
    1. Jin
      Jin April 11 2013 12: 26 New
      +2
      Quote: Begemot
      Well, you attacked DAM.
      Medvedev reflected his own vision of the situation. If a country has such a president (at that time), then it cannot claim to be a great one. Is he not right?


      laughing well, yes, veiled self-criticism! +
  • Ser 47RUS
    Ser 47RUS April 11 2013 09: 39 New
    +9
    Where is Russia a superpower?
    Laws don't work, courts don't work
    Production Zero (All Chinese G ...)
    Chechnya was purged (how much dough was sent ???)
    We forgive BILLION debts to everyone there Venezuela, Cuba and other 3 countries.
    We give gas to the Chinese for thanks.

    Personally, I want my children to live in the MOST developed and strong country! So that no one bastard could pose for our Motherland!
    But ........ read above.
    1. zvereok
      zvereok April 11 2013 10: 28 New
      +4
      Why don't they work? Work !. Now they want to pass a law stating that when they reach a debt of 5% of the price of the apartment, they will sell it under the hammer.

      And they will perfectly sell themselves.

      With rare exceptions (Dagestan, Chechnya), they are most likely afraid of it.

      Next, we read the law, after repayment, due to the sold quarter of debt, a citizen moves to another socially rented housing. Here we recall the mortgage maneuvering fund, which is not there, we recall the veterans of the Great Patriotic War, whom Putin promises to close the question almost every year of his presidency (he also promised as prime minister). In general, we understand that the law will not work in this part.

      Итак подводим итоги: Законы работают, и работают, так как нужно правительству. А я ожидаю от путина сакраментальную фразу: "Государство, это Я", ну или что-то типа "У них нет хлеба?, пусть кушают пирожные".
      1. Jin
        Jin April 11 2013 10: 40 New
        +6
        Quote: zvereok
        Why don't they work? Work !. Now they want to pass a law stating that when they reach a debt of 5% of the price of the apartment, they will sell it under the hammer.


        +++ Мог бы поставить +миллион-поставил бы! Блин и главное, что люди, молодёжь в основном, не понимают, или не хотят понять КУДА движется всё это дело, под названием новая Россия! Им за*ирают головы кредитами, ипотеками и гаджетами, а они рады и говорят, что: "Зато теперь всё есть!!!" УЖАС!!! У кого есть?? У тебя спрашиваю? Или в магазинах??? И что, спрашиваю? У ТЕБЯ-ТО ЧТО ЕСТЬ??? И вот тогда в глазах появляется какое-то осознание, что нету ничего собственно, кроме вечного гимороя! Только далеко не у всех, чаще смотрят как на дурака, мол чуден вы мил человек! Да, пропаганда делает своё дело, мозги промыли грамотно. А те кто не согласен- те враги! Болотные дела творят!!!
      2. evgenm55
        evgenm55 April 11 2013 11: 35 New
        +8
        As comrade Zyuganov said, although he does not draw on an ideological blshevik-fighter, he said correctly: Gentlemen, you do not know your people, the time will come and you will not have time to run to your planes ...
        1. Jin
          Jin April 11 2013 12: 59 New
          +3
          Quote: evgenm55
          Gentlemen, you do not know your people, the time will come and you will not have time to run to your planes ...


          He said beautifully, well done!
    2. Mironk
      Mironk April 11 2013 23: 16 New
      -1
      Quote: Ser 47RUS
      Where is Russia a superpower?

      Lord! There can be no superpower with a negative population growth! Russian is getting smaller every year. It is a fact . Demography is the basis of statehood. No matter how loud slogans are written, there is a very objective indicator - the US population is growing, the population of the Russian Federation is declining.
      1. Jin
        Jin April 12 2013 18: 34 New
        0
        Quote: MironK
        Lord! There can be no superpower with a negative population growth! Russian is getting smaller every year. It is a fact . Demography is the basis of statehood. No matter how loud slogans are written, there is a very objective indicator - the US population is growing, the population of the Russian Federation is declining.


        Наверное! У меня есть для тебя огромный государственный секрет!!! Хочешь расскажу??? Тогда слушай, только никому не рассказывай, так вот: у нас тут жёсткий естественный отбор, а их культивируют как цветы тепличные.. Ещё Суворов сказал: "Воюй не числом, а уменеем!" Или так: Лучше качество, чем количество... Ну, ты понял,да?
    3. DPN
      DPN April 15 2013 00: 06 New
      0
      About KUBU in vain, it is for Russia, like Japan for the States. And then nothing will come from these debts to the common people,
  • cerko
    cerko April 11 2013 09: 42 New
    +4
    And you didn’t get the idea that GDP AND LADIES play good and bad police, and for the West, one bad and the other are good, and for the countries of the Customs Union, they’ll be very effective tactics
    1. krest.ros
      krest.ros April 11 2013 09: 53 New
      +1
      It is such a Jewish policy that operates in Russia - to divide and rule. With one hand they bless - the other is chopped.
    2. Jin
      Jin April 11 2013 10: 53 New
      +2
      Quote: cerko
      And you didn’t get the idea that GDP AND LADIES play good and bad police


      Colleague, they have already played too much! It really gets really bad for me from these people on television screens ... and when they get into the next monologue about how MUCH they did for us, it gets worse! I’m all thinking, are they specifically mocking or all the same because of the naivety of their pure child soul? But the next rotation of the GDP-DAM, DAM-GDP happened, I already wanted to call an ambulance. well, these people have no conscience ... just not!
  • Vanek
    Vanek April 11 2013 09: 45 New
    +2
    After the Bronze Soldier I won’t be surprised.
  • Seaman
    Seaman April 11 2013 09: 47 New
    0
    Quote: vadimus
    Dima iPhone was far from being an authority. And we are already getting up from our knees and this is what we are afraid of!

    Dima is still there. And it’s time to give him lectures, like Gorbatom! And we’ll get up from our knees! We got up more than once!
  • Deniska
    Deniska April 11 2013 09: 48 New
    +2
    SUPERPOWER is a very powerful state with enormous cultural, political, economic and military potentials, superior to most other states, which allows it to exercise hegemony not only in its region, but also in the most remote parts of the planet.

    A little more and we will correspond !!!
  • vladkust
    vladkust April 11 2013 09: 49 New
    +4
    МЫ Супердержава и это доказывает НАША история в которой было ОЧЕНЬ много хорошего и плохого...и всегда наши предки умели находить выходы из проблем будь это как внутренние так и внешние....сейчас главное воспитывать своих детей на том что "друзей" за бугром не так уж и много которые хотят видеть НАШУ страну СУПЕРДЕРЖАВОЙ.
    1. cerko
      cerko April 11 2013 10: 01 New
      +4
      well, as in the cartoon about dabrynia: on the border there is a pointer on one side Russia on the other side
  • Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 April 11 2013 09: 50 New
    +9
    Короче говоря, пятнистый Крот Горби, подкопал фундамент Великой Державы, взбаламутил, застой и отстой, так что на поверхность всплыло г--но нации и начало марать всё советское, а алкаш БеНя, получивший за обещание лечь на рельсы, если "росияне" станут жить хуже, почётную приставку Р к фамилии (РЕльцын), на рельсы не лёг, а здание Великой Державы протаранил локомотивом так, что оно пошло трещинами.
    Those who voted for Medvedev, if there were such, except for the CEC and Medvedev himself, are clearly mentally underdeveloped.
    1. Jin
      Jin April 11 2013 11: 34 New
      +3
      Quote: Corsair5912
      Короче говоря, пятнистый Крот Горби, подкопал фундамент Великой Державы, взбаламутил, застой и отстой, так что на поверхность всплыло г--но нации и начало марать всё советское, а алкаш БеНя, получивший за обещание лечь на рельсы, если "росияне" станут жить хуже, почётную приставку Р к фамилии (РЕльцын), на рельсы не лёг, а здание Великой Державы протаранил локомотивом так, что оно пошло трещинами.
      Those who voted for Medvedev, if there were such, except for the CEC and Medvedev himself, are clearly mentally underdeveloped.


      +100 Colleague! Very much said, competently!
    2. Denis
      Denis April 11 2013 20: 32 New
      +4
      Quote: Corsair5912
      drunk Benya, who received a promise to lie on the rails
      I, too, Anna Karenina, ... (hereinafter a long peep)
      Rather, it is:
  • Logician
    Logician April 11 2013 09: 52 New
    +4
    60s sold and destroyed the USSR .... 75-80 will be restored and returned .... older brothers were too weak to resist, younger ones do not want to be weak pacifists by the example of older ones !!!
    1. Frunze
      Frunze April 11 2013 15: 26 New
      +1
      To the point, physicists were changed to lyricists (libers) hi
      1. lubin
        lubin April 11 2013 15: 42 New
        0
        Nobody changed anyone. Just among them appeared a lot of crooks and hucksters.
  • Seaman
    Seaman April 11 2013 09: 54 New
    +3
    Quote: vadimus
    Dima iPhone was far from being an authority. And we are already getting up from our knees and this is what we are afraid of!

    Dima is still there. Although he should have lectured long ago, like Gorbatom. And we’ll get up from our knees! We got up more than once! Not that country Russia.
  • Logician
    Logician April 11 2013 09: 58 New
    +5
    We are not on our knees, we just went to the squat !!!)))
    1. seed
      seed April 11 2013 10: 53 New
      +5
      Точно, а потом цыганочка с выходом из-за печки с раздачей люлей особо вредным "партнерам". smile
    2. Corsair5912
      Corsair5912 April 11 2013 11: 29 New
      +1
      Russian dance squatting, crouched to the floor, and then who jumps higher.
  • igorgar
    igorgar April 11 2013 10: 04 New
    +2
    Medvedev, of course, is still a typical one: for an iPhone and a hamburger he made friends with Obama and passed Libya without even blushing.
  • sibircat
    sibircat April 11 2013 10: 14 New
    0
    Каждый народ достоин своего правителя. Я, не хочу быть достойным таких правителей, и если Путин не избавится от таких "помощников", на следующих выборах народ избавится от него.
    1. Jin
      Jin April 11 2013 14: 02 New
      +1
      I would very much like to believe in it, but, it seems to me, it will not be possible to get rid of it ...
  • VadimSt
    VadimSt April 11 2013 10: 29 New
    +2
    Yes! To hell with us, the intervention of others - we ourselves will swing our boat!
  • pinecone
    pinecone April 11 2013 10: 30 New
    +2
    Это не ДАМ, а "дама", мужчина в женских трусах.
  • krokodil25
    krokodil25 April 11 2013 10: 34 New
    +3
    RUSSIA has always been and will be SUPERPOWER !!!
  • bubla5
    bubla5 April 11 2013 10: 39 New
    +2
    Yes, the time will come and I think the clowns will leave, the time will come for Great Russia, we will deal with migration, give proper and deserved assessments to the thieves oligarchs, bureaucrats with their offspring, but no, then the Nazi idiology will take revenge all over the country.
  • Bezarius
    Bezarius April 11 2013 10: 46 New
    +6
    Russia can exist only in the role of a superpower or not exist at all, they simply will not allow it.
    1. Nitup
      Nitup April 11 2013 10: 57 New
      +2
      I support. Or Russia is a powerful state, or further disintegration into parts. You don’t have to choose
  • wax
    wax April 11 2013 10: 46 New
    +2
    Alexey, you are in the right stream. With you. Keep it up!
  • s500
    s500 April 11 2013 10: 48 New
    +2
    My Homeland Russia was and I hope it will be a magical power !!!!!
  • COBOK
    COBOK April 11 2013 10: 51 New
    +4
    Lyndon LaRouche: Dvorkovich is a British agent.

    A plush implied IMHO.
  • Vtel
    Vtel April 11 2013 10: 58 New
    14
    There are no words! Just let them not forget the Russian people can’t defeat them!
    1. sven27
      sven27 April 11 2013 12: 42 New
      +1
      It seems to me that in 10 years Medvedev, like Gorbachev, will begin to travel around the world with lectures on democracy
  • Black
    Black April 11 2013 10: 59 New
    +5
    Do not pretend to be a superpower - do not have a heart,
    To consider yourself as such at present is to have no head.

    This is if the current president is rephrased a bit ...
    To position yourself as a superpower, you need to behave accordingly, live by these standards. In the meantime, we as a rickety teenager before a tuxedo. Roads are necessary. And get well.
    1. Jin
      Jin April 11 2013 13: 14 New
      +1
      Quote: Chen
      Do not pretend to be a superpower - do not have a heart,
      To consider yourself as such at present is to have no head.
      This is if the current president is rephrased a bit ...
      To position yourself as a superpower, you need to behave accordingly, live by these standards. In the meantime, we as a rickety teenager before a tuxedo. Roads are necessary. And get well


      there is a sound grain in all this, there is! I think the fact is that just with such a president and relevant policies, read behavior, you will never get better ... just get sick. And the big, evil guys unleash to death
  • Black
    Black April 11 2013 10: 59 New
    +1
    Do not pretend to be a superpower - do not have a heart,
    To consider yourself as such at present is to have no head.

    This is if the current president is rephrased a bit ...
    To position yourself as a superpower, you need to behave accordingly, live by these standards. In the meantime, we as a rickety teenager before a tuxedo. Roads are necessary. And get well.
    1. Yarbay
      Yarbay April 11 2013 11: 43 New
      +3
      Quote: Chen
      Do not pretend to be a superpower - do not have a heart,
      To consider yourself as such at present is to have no head.

      similar to Cherchel’s words about liberals and conservatives !!
      I agree with you on the text!
  • pensioner
    pensioner April 11 2013 11: 16 New
    +3
    Quote: COBOK
    resources do not belong to us already (most in private hands)

    Well not so. The good the resources hidden by nature deep in the earth are that you can always nationalize back. Zae .... tsya from America to sail to Siberia to return back.
  • mayor46
    mayor46 April 11 2013 11: 17 New
    +3
    В супердержавах дерьмократы "гребут" в свою страну, а наши из
  • Navy7981
    Navy7981 April 11 2013 11: 17 New
    +2
    Вот уж временщик. Уйдет он и через какое то время его забудут. Как и не было никого. Кто то, в случайном разговоре будет щёлкать пальцами вспоминая - .... ну, как его там, ну этот, который вроде президентом был, гаджеты любил ... . Ну не хотят уходить великими или просто "строителями", хотят уходить богатыми, сытыми, со словами - мол сделал всё что мог. Лучше бы ничего не делал.
  • pensioner
    pensioner April 11 2013 11: 23 New
    +1
    Quote: Atlon
    Correctly! Ftopku of Anglicism!

    Yes, they already pulled up with these English. words. Off topic a bit. A Dry Superjet will then be right: Dry Super ... Super what?
    1. Jin
      Jin April 11 2013 14: 31 New
      +1
      Quote: retired
      So what?


      According to this, Sukhoi SuperJet or SuperJet Dry comes out, as you like! Oh how! laughing
  • Mitzhel
    Mitzhel April 11 2013 11: 29 New
    +2
    Quote: Romn
    WE ARE SUPERPOWER!


    The Presidents of the Great Powers and especially the SUPERPOWER move on cars made in their Great Countries. And what does Vladimir Vladimirovich ride?
  • Legion
    Legion April 11 2013 11: 41 New
    +3
    In my opinion, sovereignty is determined by the cohesion, interest and culture of the people. But not as if by force the former greatness and economy ... Pay nologs, give birth to children, study, create new things, appreciate the old ...
    History itself will decide which state is a Power !!!
  • Gorchakov
    Gorchakov April 11 2013 11: 42 New
    +2
    I really want Gorbachev and his follower Medvedev to answer someday before the people of Great Russia for everything that they have done ....
    1. Mitzhel
      Mitzhel April 11 2013 11: 45 New
      +2
      what kind of villain Medvedev (a follower of Gorbachev) put on the throne so that he would warm his place and now holds it in the prime ministers? He should not answer to the people of Great Russia ??