"Black Mark to all"
2012 was a very interesting year in many ways. In 2012, some knots that were tied earlier were untied, and, as is usually the case, those knots that are likely to be untied in the future — or are already starting to be untied."Vatican Spring"
For example, in the middle of last year, a scandal erupted in the Vatican, and before our eyes this knot was unleashed by the departure of the Pope. And I must say that the world top Pope still squeezed. One of the people in his inner circle said about this very interestingly: “Here we had the Arab spring, and now it will be the Vatican spring”. This tells us where the wind blows.
In general, all the talk about the resignation of the Pope was unexpected - from the evil one. As Galich sang, "this, red, all to the public." In fact, the pressure on the Pope was rather long. He annoyed very many - and the fact that he is a traditionalist and does not tolerate the word "tolerance". And that spoke out about the gay community. But the most important thing, of course, is not in this, but in the two trillions of dollars that belong to the Vatican Bank and which are very, very much needed now by the world top. And, apparently, in the final resolution of the question of Pope Benedict XVI, both the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers played a role, but the black mark was sent to the Pope in the middle of last year.
"The dismantling of capitalism"
If we talk about such major international events, of course, another Davos forum should be noted. This is the end of January - the beginning of February. And the next meeting of the Bilderberg club. True, the Davos forum in 12 was more interesting than the meeting of the Bilderberg club, because the anti-liberal position in the economy was very clearly expressed at the Davos forum. Moreover, it sounded from the lips of the chairman of the Davos forum of the German Klaus Schwab, who said that capitalism no longer corresponds to the world that exists around us. And this once again testifies to the fact that the western elite headed for the dismantling of capitalism. Those. the institutional system that provides for the accumulation of capital and which now prevents this accumulation. Those. Schwab said what Jacques Catholi and many others had said long ago.
But the Bilderberg club, in which there were three representatives of Russia (this, according to tradition, Chubais, Kasparov and former Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov) went quite calmly, without disputing about reducing the world population by 80%, as it was three years ago. However, when we talk about the Bilderberg club, we must remember that this is just a structure for coordinating interests. As a rule, some agenda is made, which is not formed by the Bilderberg club itself, and it is discussed at it.
In general, the original Bilderberg club was created to coordinate issues in the aristocratic-dynastic environment. It was then brought up burzhuiny.
In the same month, a very interesting thing happened, about which there was much debate. 30 May 2012, the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds announced the creation of a total trust in 40 billions of dollars. Economists have started talking that they are preparing to meet the global crisis. These conversations are very strange, because the state of the Rothschild surpasses 3 for a trillion dollars, for 1 a trillion dollars less in Rockefellers, i.e. What is 40 billion for these two families is just a penny!
It is very interesting how these billions shared. The Rockefellers have laid out 37 billion, the Rothschilds - 3 billion. From the Rockefellers, the head of the clan participated in the negotiations, but from the Rothschilds there was a person who is considered to be in the family if not a village idiot, then an outcast, and this somehow reduced the level. But what is interesting is that the Rockefellers gave more money, and the Rothschilds will manage this trust. In the confrontation of these two clans, the scales now outweigh the Rothschilds side. And in general, it must be said that the struggle in the first 10 – 15 world families never ends in tragic, physical destruction. There is the principle of a water truce. Those. these families do not achieve to the end, but the struggle between them is quite fierce. And if at the beginning of the twentieth century the Rothschilds had the advantage, then the Rockefellers practically won them two world wars, but the Rothschilds were preparing their own retaliatory strike against the dollar, and now we see the Rothschild counteroffensive.
"Fights skeletons over the abyss"
31 August 2012, the High Court in London announced its verdict - Berezovsky did not beat Abramovich. It would seem that all. But this court led to very serious consequences, which will probably be covered not now, but a little later. The fact is that both - the plaintiff, the defendant, and Berezovsky, and Abramovich - in fact, explained to the court and the whole West with their testimonies that almost all the states acquired in Russia in the 90s were not fair. And now there is a legal basis for the confiscation of these states, if the need arises. And the fact that such a need arises, it is already clear again from the events of 2012 of the year.
In June, 2012, the Morgan Stanley Management report was made public in which it was charged against oil speculators, who were called bloodsuckers. (By the way, ironically, our journalists called the hearing Berezovsky-Abramovich a battle between two bloodsuckers). So, Morgan Stanley Management called the oil industry speculators oil the bloodsuckers, who need to confiscate their funds, because they are not fair acquired.
And in October, the traditional meeting was held in Tokyo, 2012: World Bank - International Monetary Fund. And Christine Lagarde said the following: on average, the public debt of industrialized countries is 110% relative to GDP. And that is an indicator of wartime. She did not mean that war was about to start. She meant a much more insidious thing for the world top. By this she wanted to say that the time had come to confiscate the “young” money that had been acquired through speculation. And then she said openly who should be the object of confiscation — bankers, oligarchs, dishonest state bureaucrats from various countries who had acquired this “young” money by dishonest means.
Naturally not Lagard to say such things about dishonest money. She knows perfectly well how this world works, but the question arose about who is who, who, and it’s absolutely clear that it will be “young” money that will be thrashed, not old. And then a very interesting event happened. For this, from the point of view of the world oligarchy, a trifling fault was fined 340 million dollars by the Standard Charter Bank Bank, which is the Bank of Banks. It was created in 1859 year. The bank is not the largest, but it is the oldest and most respected bank. If you look at the hierarchical table of banks, it will never be in this table; it is not fixed, thus marking its absolutely special unique position.
So, without Barukhov’s consent no one would have done that. The amount is, however, negligible. 340 million is not even a billion, but it is a symbolic amount. If Baruchs themselves did not allow themselves to be fined, they would not have been fined.
What does this action show, what does it indicate? She points out that we all walk under God, and if Barukhov was fined, then the rest will go together. And in this respect, it is a black mark for almost everyone. And, by the way, the owners of the “young” money reacted to this black mark - even anticipating it. For example, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett announced that they would not leave most of their fortunes to their heirs, but would donate them to the fund for public needs. Those. they rent them to a certain obshchak. By the way, we have an oligarch who spoke in the same way - this is Potanin. These people buy a place for themselves among those who will not crush.
This is very similar to the situation when thieves in law in our 70-ies bombed the tsekhoviki, and the tsekhoviki paid off from them. It is very difficult to say how far this process will go. I think we will see many more interesting things. Deripaska’s court is coming up against Chernov, Levayev’s against Gaydamak, and other skeletal clashes over the precipice.
"The beetle ate the grass"
Another interesting thing. Filed in August, if I am not mistaken, the 12 of the year of a lawsuit against the President of Rwanda, Kagame, for the events of 1994 of the year is the Hutu-Tutsi massacre. The authorities of Rwanda tried to sue several times, but the Western states, first of all France, tried to block this initiative and suddenly now allowed it. What's the matter? What is it all about story?
It is known that about a million people died in Rwanda itself ... About as many in neighboring states, i.e. in a very short time, about two million people were slaughtered. Nobody shouts, however, about the Holocaust, no one tears his vest on himself. And, moreover, attempts to understand this issue were blocked. And suddenly the trial began. Now it is difficult to say about all the undercurrents of this process, but something is already possible.
The fact is that those people who are now wanted for the events of 94 year, and this, oddly enough, the former Ukrainian and French mercenaries, rightly say that the so-called world community, the world oligarchy, could prevent a massacre in this African country, but the UN garrison received an order not to move, and this order came simultaneously from Paris and from New York. Global management and coordination structures gave the go-ahead not to interfere - “guys, cut each other”. And one of the people who blocked the French’s action was French President Mitterrand. But now you will not get him, he died. But about three dozen representatives of the world elite from different countries in connection with this trial about the 94 year case may be under serious accusations. This once again says that the matter, of course, is not Hutu and Tutsi, Hutu and Tutsi - not Jews and not Arabs, and the world community treats them very calmly, but on this court you can pull out some figures from different world clans.
All this means that the struggle in the world top is very serious. The stakes are very high, and this is another confirmation of the thesis that the world is moving towards very serious conflicts, and these conflicts are developing at all levels. And, which was not typical for the end of the twentieth century, they took a very sharp form in the struggle of the tops.
It is clear that this process slowed down at the end of the twentieth century - they divided the Soviet pie, pulled out for 90-s according to different estimates from one to two trillion dollars from the former socialist camp, devoured them for ten years, and now everything is eaten, which means you need to act differently.
When I look at the current situation at the top of the world pyramid, I remember the lines of our remarkable poet Zabolotsky: “The beetle ate grass, the bird choked the bird, the ferret drank the brain from the bird's head, and the distorted faces of night creatures looked out of the grass.” Night creatures are a lower world community that looks at how these giants clash with each other.
"Skull and Bones"
In April, 12 in the United States created a new military service that will do what the CIA did before. Collection of information outside the combat zone. But, doing what the CIA did, this structure under the Ministry of Defense will be subordinate only to the Ministry of Defense, there will be about the same personnel as in the CIA. And one wonders, why another duplicate structure? What they will do is the collection of information on Africa and the Arab world, the economic modernization of the PRC, nuclear weapon Korea and one very important thing is the development of models for the creation of partisan movements in different parts of the world.
Partisan movements are created that act against the legitimate authority. Usually it used to be, on the contrary, the left; now the official structures will do the same. From a political point of view, this means that the US Department of Defense is beginning to engage in political activities too, because, in principle, the US military had its own intelligence agency, DIA, the intelligence department of the Ministry of Defense, and another service appears that duplicates the CIA, i.e. . The CIA is moving away. You need to know that the CIA was originally created at the end of 40 by the serious intellectual forces of the United States, and there were many immigrants from Yale University.
Yale University is the patrimony of the closed structure "Skull and Bones", it is the so-called Yale Illuminati. At the end of 2012, Petraeus (CIA director, resigned due to extramarital affair - approx. LOOK), Petraeus is a Bush man, this is Yale Illuminati. The Clinton couples opposed the Bushs, and they too have ties with this society.
We have no direct evidence, but from the totality of indirect evidence, we can assume that the Yale Illuminati are moving away from the important levers of power. And if we are talking about citizen Clinton, who left her post, it is very interesting to see who came to replace. Kerry is a very interesting character in his background. The Kerry surname is the name of a Scottish village where the Jewish ancestors of Kerry on the paternal side arrived. But his maternal ancestors are much more interesting - this is the Forbes family. His grandmother, Winthrop, is a relative of several of the royal families of Europe and a relative of Bush (this means that Kelly comes from Wilhelm the Conqueror). Moreover, Kelly is a relative not only of several royal families of Europe, but also of the Middle East, and this means that in the Middle East they will talk to him quite differently than with citizen Clinton. In addition, Kerry himself graduated from several prestigious educational institutions, and while studying in one of them, he became close to the Kennedy family and participated with this Anglo-Irish clan in the election campaigns of John F. Kennedy, and then Edward Kennedy. Then he went to Yale, where he joined the society "Skull and Bones", and he had contact with the Bush. Those. this is a person who is involved at once in several closed structures, a relative of many people ...
“Clear Logic”
There is a Japanese game “Go”, where stones are exposed to strategically important positions. 2012 year is the process of preparing some important positions for the future. In the actions of the world elite can be traced very clear logic.
2012 year did not lead to some fundamental changes. But, nevertheless, combinations are lined up, and, in general, it is clear how events will develop further.
About a year ago, one of the cardinals, not from the Pope’s team, said the phrase “The Pope has a year to live.” In the twentieth century, two Pope Pope - Pius XI and John Paul I - went to the next world under strange circumstances, and Pius XI (39 year) had the next day to make an anti-fascist speech ... Suspicion fell on a man by the name of Petacci . It was a doctor, one of the main doctors of the Vatican, and, by the way, Clara Petacci’s father, Mussolini’s mistress, who did not leave him and was killed along with him. It was suspected that he gave the Pope an injection. Well, John Paul I simply went into the investigation of financial abuse and went to the next world. I think that an offer was made to Pope Benedict XVI, and he could not refuse it. At stake is two trillion dollars. And for smaller amounts of people sent to the next world.
Sunstein's words about the Vatican spring waiting for us are very revealing.
Information