Trump and Hegseth may not have been aware: US intelligence prepared attacks on Russian Aerospace Forces military airfields

17 198 51
Trump and Hegseth may not have been aware: US intelligence prepared attacks on Russian Aerospace Forces military airfields

Zelensky's regime does not intend to stop escalating the conflict with Russia, constantly raising its degree. In this regard, Kyiv is supported by most European NATO countries, which are ready to continue supplying the Ukrainian Armed Forces with weapons and patronizing the terrorist regime in Ukraine for the sake of confrontation with Russia.

The recent attack on Russian military airfields, where strategic bombers of the Russian Aerospace Forces, which are part of the Russian nuclear triad, were based, is further confirmation of this. This operation, allegedly carried out by the SBU, was clearly prepared with the direct assistance of American military intelligence (DIA). This is the conclusion reached by the author Articles in the Russian analytical online publication “Strategic Culture Foundation”.



Kyiv said that this sabotage had been in preparation for a year and a half. Therefore, everything had been started under US President Joe Biden and then-Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. Trump has already stated that no one informed him about this attack, and this may be true.

The point is that many in the Pentagon are unhappy with the reforms, the change in foreign policy, including with regard to the Ukrainian conflict, that Donald Trump and the new Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth are implementing. There may be obvious sabotage by opponents of the head of the White House and his team, including in American military intelligence. It was the Pentagon's intelligence that could have satellite images of Russian airfields and shared them with Kiev, without necessarily informing Donald Trump and the US Secretary of Defense.

The events of June 1 also sparked a debate in Russian society about why the planes were in the open and unprotected from external influences. The journalistic community began to refer to the treaties on the reduction of strategic offensive arms (START). However, this is incorrect, they are currently not in effect.

The START I treaty, signed between the USSR and the USA, ceased to be effective in 1. The next similar agreement, START II, ​​never entered into force.

As for the START-3 Treaty, signed by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and US President Barack Obama in 2010, at the initiative of Russian leader Vladimir Putin, our country suspended its effect by a special law at the end of February 2023.

The Russian President then emphasized that it was a question of suspension, not withdrawal from this document. We will add that "suspension of the agreement" means a temporary suspension of all obligations of the parties for an indefinite period.

This means that from the specified time the provisions of the START-3 treaty concerning the ban on concealing objects of the nuclear triad of the RF Armed Forces are no longer in effect. However, over the course of two years, capital hangars (caponiers), as was practiced in Soviet times, for the aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces were built, which the enemy took advantage of, not without the secret help of overseas patrons from the DIA.

It should also be noted that in connection with the so-called Operation "Web", the loud PR campaign to the whole world of the head of the SBU Vasyl Malyuk* seems strange. He is officially called responsible for the terrorist attack carried out in Russia. But the SBU is a counterintelligence agency, and its tasks do not include conducting such operations outside the country.

However, the participation of the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Kirill Budanov*, in this action seems more plausible. Kyiv's Western partners most likely decided to remove him from the line of fire, since they plan to make another terrorist the new president of Ukraine. However, the head of Ukrainian military intelligence is not capable of conducting such operations without the direct participation of foreign intelligence services, the author of the article believes.

* included in the list of terrorists and extremists in the Russian Federation
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    10 June 2025 15: 56
    yes, we need to kill both Malyuk and Budanov, plus Yermak to boot
    1. +3
      10 June 2025 20: 40
      Mazunga
      Today, 15: 56
      yes, we need to kill both Malyuk and Budanov, plus Yermak to boot

      hi This means that from the specified time the provisions of the START-3 treaty concerning the ban on concealing objects of the nuclear triad of the RF Armed Forces are no longer in effect. However, in two years capital hangars (caponiers), as was practiced in Soviet times, for aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces that's how they were built, which the enemy took advantage of, not without the secret help of overseas patrons from the DIA.

      The author of the article failed the denial NOT in a sentence that distorts the very essence.
      1. +1
        10 June 2025 21: 06
        This means that from the specified time, the provisions of the START-3 Treaty concerning the prohibition of concealing objects of the nuclear triad of the Russian Armed Forces are no longer in effect.
        It is they (the clauses of the START3 treaty) that do not apply to them, but we are not them... We (damn it) are so "correct" that we will comply even with what no one else is complying with... Well, and then, I do not believe that Trump was not informed... If the leadership of the American military intelligence is still in place, then Trump knew everything... But Donya is an artist no worse than Zelensky, so he will deny it to the last... am
        1. +2
          10 June 2025 21: 21
          Lev_Russia
          Today, 21: 06
          It is they (the clauses of the START3 treaty) that do not apply to them, but we are not them... We (damn it) are so "correct" that we will comply even with what no one else is complying with... Well, and then, I do not believe that Trump was not informed... If the leadership of American military intelligence is still in place, then Trump knew everything... But Donya is an artist no worse than Zelensky, so he will deny it to the last

          hi It's high time to get used to the lies and hypocrisy of mattress makers and small-minded people, regardless of status and position, including the very top ones.
          Without a doubt, the intelligence was provided by the penguins and the organization of the attack was carried out by the penguins and the small-breasted ones.
          I mean the goal of the operation is a real test of the pain limit of the military-political leadership in delivering retaliatory strikes in light of the new doctrine. soldier
        2. +1
          11 June 2025 06: 24
          if you had a house in the village... Oklahoma or a chalet in Cheyenne, you would also be understanding)) laughing here from a minor official of the Ust-Perduisk administration to the prime minister from a judge to a plenipotentiary representative somehow accidentally there it turns out that you are like little children or lads))? we will not have a war with the USA well, in general, without a reason, how to fight with yourself, I don’t know how it turns out that if not the most loyal Leninists and then effective managers, then their children suddenly end up not in Vologda but in Vancouver)) Let’s take Suslov, a typical party functionary, an ascetic, buried on Red Square, and his daughter in Austria has long since disappeared into the fog
  2. +3
    10 June 2025 16: 00
    Trump has already stated that no one informed him about this attack.

    Old songs about the main thing)
    And does anyone believe this?
  3. +1
    10 June 2025 16: 00
    In Soviet times, were permanent shelters built for the TU-95? recourse
    1. +4
      10 June 2025 16: 10
      During the Soviet era, permanent shelters were not built for the TU-95.
    2. +5
      10 June 2025 16: 10
      At that time, no one would have dared to attack them.
    3. +1
      10 June 2025 16: 14
      During the Soviet era, were permanent shelters built for the TU-95?

      No, they didn't build it.
      It seems like there were some for the Tu-16...
  4. +1
    10 June 2025 16: 18
    There is such a version
    "Hua Bin. The Mystery of Drones Over New Jersey (version)"
    https://aftershock.news/?q=node/1512411
  5. 0
    10 June 2025 16: 18
    why were the planes in the open and not protected from external influences
    How come they weren't protected? Some smart guy threw Zhiguli wheels on the fenders.
    1. -1
      11 June 2025 10: 06
      so those were kama standard show-offs in short if Michelin or Goodyear had thrown in then yes and what can you take from kama
  6. -1
    10 June 2025 16: 20
    It is quite an acceptable thought, is the Washington administration capable of pursuing such a policy? F-16, Abrams, etc. have already become commonplace on the outskirts.
  7. +2
    10 June 2025 16: 25
    "...Trump and Hegseth might not have been aware: the attacks on the military airfields of the Russian Aerospace Forces were prepared by US intelligence...." It's a pity... Although, logic suggests the OPPOSITE.... In that case, this is ANGLO-SAXON PHARISEISM.... That's how it is.... And, in that case, you can't trust anyone, even Donald Fredovich, and his comrades, by definition, and smash the Ukroreikh with double the force... "Our cause is just! Victory will be ours!!!!"
  8. HAM
    +4
    10 June 2025 16: 27
    There is some kind of whitewashing going on today: Trump and Hegseth "didn't know", the Jewish "Patriots" "didn't supply"... do they take us for fools?
    1. +3
      10 June 2025 21: 05
      HAM, naturally they "hold on"... After all, for so many decades they allowed themselves to be "walked on" and repeated like a mantra: we, after all, are like you, bourgeois...
      1. -1
        11 June 2025 10: 07
        They haven't changed even now, so they pour into your ears and goy doesn't get smarter
  9. -1
    10 June 2025 16: 33
    clauses of the START-3 Treaty concerning the prohibition of concealing objects of the nuclear triad of the Russian Armed Forces.
    which never existed fool
  10. +4
    10 June 2025 16: 44
    Yes, who told the author that
    The head of Ukrainian military intelligence is unable to carry out such operations without the direct participation of foreign intelligence services


    Everyone knows where these airfields are, it's written in every Wikipedia. Any blonde can rent or buy a couple of trucks. Anyone who knows how to drive a truck can drive these trucks to the truck stop closest to the base (from which the base is already visible) and park at this stop.

    What was there that the khokhlo intelligence couldn't do? That's what?
    1. 0
      10 June 2025 18: 19
      To launch cruise missiles, it is not necessary to use strategic aviation aircraft; unlike free-fall bombs, missiles can also fly, and if desired, they can be launched from ground-based launchers.
      1. 0
        11 June 2025 02: 14
        You probably wrote this to me by mistake, I had something completely different in mind.
    2. -3
      10 June 2025 19: 49
      There was consent from the Ukrainian owners to such an action. As well as to the others.
      1. -2
        10 June 2025 20: 12
        Quote from alexoff
        There was consent from the Ukrainian owners to such an action. As well as to the others.

        Nobody asked them. The owners. They did it - and that's it.
        1. -1
          10 June 2025 20: 35
          No one asked Skaklov about this - they said to do it - and that's it. They wrote the same nonsense about Kursk Oblast, like Biden didn't know. But then Biden, who knows nothing, allowed the missiles to be used there so that Skaklov wouldn't be driven out of there.
          1. 0
            12 June 2025 00: 10
            And how does Biden's permission to fire missiles prove that he knew about the Kursk operation? What is your logic anyway? All of your cap-cometers are stupid, the Ukrainians can't develop any missiles, the Anglo-Saxons installed all of this, or the Ukrainians couldn't possibly carry out such an operation because they are definitely stupid. And so on.
      2. 0
        11 June 2025 02: 15
        Unsubstantiated. There is not a single fact that would confirm this.
        1. -2
          11 June 2025 02: 55
          There is not a single fact that denies. The US has long controlled Ukraine and especially the SBU. Trump was not surprised at all and did not react in any way. Similarly, zero reaction to terrorist attacks. Cold War documents show that the US carried out a huge number of operations where first the CIA was not aware of what their stooges were doing, and then the American government was not aware of what the CIA was doing.
          1. 0
            11 June 2025 21: 21
            That is, the well-known fact that they are bastards is used as evidence. Understandable.
            1. -1
              11 June 2025 21: 36
              Evidence - officially published documents of similar cases earlier. And a similar reaction now. It is clear that the foreign tsars are good, the bad boyars are doing dirty tricks
              1. -1
                12 June 2025 09: 50
                Evidence - officially published documents of similar cases earlier

                That's what I'm saying.

                The fact that those cases have nothing to do with this one shouldn't bother anyone. It's clear that they are bastards.
                1. 0
                  12 June 2025 19: 35
                  However, they behaved suspiciously, and as politicians of a vile country they are under suspicion. You could also say from the data of 1943 that there is no evidence that Hitler knew anything about the Holocaust. He did not come to all these Buchenwalds, he was not aware of it.
    3. 0
      10 June 2025 21: 20
      I'm more interested in where was counterintelligence? All these publications look like an excuse "the Americans prepared this, and we don't know the American language"... And no one resigned. Well, the CIA, that's a valid reason, apparently.
    4. -4
      10 June 2025 23: 33
      "What was there that the khokhlo intelligence couldn't do?"///
      ----
      Absolutely.
      The FSB is unable to admit that such an unprecedented, grandiose operation was carried out by Ukrainian special services.
      Without any "all-powerful" Anglo-Saxons.
      The American intelligence agency CIA was itself in complete shock from this operation, as was the Pentagon.
      Because American air force bases absolutely are not protected from such drone attacks.
      If the Americans had information about the "Web", they would: 1) leak it to Russian intelligence, fearing a strategic escalation with Russia
      2) would begin to take measures against such attacks.
      1. +5
        10 June 2025 23: 36
        Quote: voyaka uh
        American intelligence, the CIA, was in complete shock from this operation, as was the Pentagon.

        Is there any similar information about the English, by any chance?
        1. -5
          10 June 2025 23: 45
          Normal intelligence agencies do not share information with anyone in operations of this level.
          Not the Mossad, not the CIA, not MI6.
          Because there are moles, ideological patriots of the enemy and just slobs in all the special services: they will leak to the enemy.
          The less they know even their own, the greater the chance of success.
          1. +3
            10 June 2025 23: 47
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Normal intelligence services do not share information with anyone in operations of this level. Neither Mossad, nor the CIA, nor MI6.

            Logical.

            Quote: voyaka uh
            The American intelligence agency CIA was itself in complete shock from this operation.

            So these are your personal thoughts on the topic, right?
      2. +3
        10 June 2025 23: 46
        Quote: voyaka uh
        such an unprecedented, grandiose operation was carried out by the Ukrainian special services

        Unprecedented - yes. Grandiose - in terms of results - yes. In terms of implementation... hm.

        - equipment - made of shit and sticks, everything used except explosives (and there is no need for much of it) - is on open sale
        - the coordinates of the airfields are known, then - FPV

        And what, tell me, is so grandiose about this?
        1. -4
          10 June 2025 23: 47
          The result is magnificent.
          This is much cooler than Hezbollah's exploding pagers.
          1. +5
            10 June 2025 23: 48
            Quote: voyaka uh
            The result is grandiose

            I already said that tongue

            Got it, thread closed Yes
      3. -1
        11 June 2025 02: 56
        Quote: voyaka uh
        The American intelligence agency CIA was itself in complete shock from this operation, as was the Pentagon.

        it's time for some awesome stories! That's why all the media rushed to applaud because they knew there would be no reaction?
  11. -1
    10 June 2025 18: 31
    However, in two years, capital hangars (caponiers), as was practiced in Soviet times, for Russian Aerospace Forces aircraft that's how they were built, which the enemy took advantage of, not without the secret help of overseas patrons from the DIA.
    .
    The author of the article has lost "NOT" in the highlighted text. As a result, the meaning is distorted.
  12. 0
    10 June 2025 21: 15
    How many articles about who, where and what was planned. But not a single investigation of "who overslept". This means that someone will oversleep the new attack and they will start writing articles again...
    1. +1
      10 June 2025 21: 20
      Quote from: Alex_mech
      But not a single investigation into “who overslept”

      It is a very closed topic. And it is right.

      You should also ask for the findings of the investigation commissions and changes in security plans to be made publicly available. wink laughing
      1. -1
        10 June 2025 21: 22
        I'm not talking about secret details, but about the responsibility of certain departments and big bosses.
        1. +1
          10 June 2025 21: 23
          Quote from: Alex_mech
          responsibility of certain departments and big bosses

          And this is also a closed topic. You will manage (me too, by the way), and let the enemies think - what conclusions were made there.
          1. 0
            10 June 2025 21: 27
            Well, I see. The topic is secret, not a single general was hurt or deprived of a bonus. request
            1. +1
              10 June 2025 21: 29
              Quote from: Alex_mech
              not a single general was hurt or deprived of a bonus

              Not a fact. I once served in the army, and I know how perks are handed out there. But no one is obliged to report this to you, and therefore no one will. Resign yourself to it. Yes
  13. 0
    11 June 2025 06: 59
    No, what Austin? This operation was prepared by Collin Powell!
  14. 0
    11 June 2025 10: 00
    The Americans prepared the operation for a year and a half, and then suddenly the Americans didn’t know about it!
    Well, they can’t even lie convincingly.
  15. 0
    11 June 2025 13: 12
    Yes, I also think that if the Houthis, at our instigation, burned about fifty B52s and Lancers, Donya would also simply wave his hand in our direction, like, screw them, there’s still a lot of this scrap metal in the parking lots,