Behind the pages of documents. Or once again about something very strange…

A still from a very interesting film, "Cruelty" (1959). A Chekist commits suicide. A loyal young man devoted to the cause of the revolution. But why he did it and what he was disappointed in - that's what the film is about. The director, however, was required to include a personal motive, love, in the reasons for the suicide, well, of course, otherwise... But anyway, why it happened was clear to everyone.
3 Timothy 2:XNUMX
History in documents. We live in a world of oddities and contradictions. Moreover, if we look into the archive documents, we will see that there are countless of them there too. Moreover, there are countless of them on the pages of the newspaper Pravda, and in those same 30-40s of the last century it was controlled in so many ways. After all, this organ was the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), and therefore, it is blameless in all respects. But even there there are discrepancies, inconsistencies and direct contradictions in abundance. Although, in principle, this should not be.
As a child, I, of course, had no idea that there could be something “wrong” in newspapers and magazines. Until I found an old thick calendar from 1941, and there some photographs and articles were underlined by my grandfather, and under Beria’s portrait there was even an inscription (the article said how wonderful he was!): “Enemy of the people. Shot, the dog!”
Following the calendar, I came across a thick file of the newspaper Pravda (and how Grandpa wasn’t too lazy to file it!). I started looking in it and, of course, found a lot of photographs tanks and other weapons, but again, what surprised me most was the underlining. My grandfather must have made them after 1953, or maybe even 1956. And in them, with references to other "Pravda" articles, it was precisely these kinds of inconsistencies that were pointed out.
For example, I noticed a 1942 article about Germans in Germany starving and eating surrogates. But a 1944 newspaper wrote that they were gorging themselves, that boxes of French cognac, Strasbourg pates, salami, Danish cheeses were found in their apartments... For some reason, such comparisons in Pravda seemed very... shameful to me. As if I had peeked into something indecent, so I immediately abandoned further digging in that file.
So I never got around to asking my grandfather how, why and for what purpose he searched for such "inconsistencies" in newspapers, underlined and made cross-references. And then it all disappeared somewhere, so now I have to restore all these interesting finds. But what is important is that smart people who "laid their lives" on the altar of the Fatherland (and my grandfather was awarded the Order of Lenin and the "Badge of Honor" for his work during the war) were generally involved in such things.
In any case, there have been, are and will be oddities in everything that concerns the information surrounding us. And this time my visit to the regional party archive brought one such extremely interesting find. This time they brought me a folder for work with the minutes of closed meetings of the bureau of the city committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) with the results of the votes for January-November 1937.

Cover of this folder
I didn't expect to find anything particularly new there. Well, it's clear what the high-level bureau meetings were devoted to at that time. Of course, the fight against the enemies of the people, who were found almost everywhere that year.

Here, for example, is the accident in the boiler room of the Frunze plant...
And it happened because “the director did not show due attention…”, and the team was contaminated with anti-Soviet elements who were engaging in anti-Soviet conversations.

Anti-Soviet elements were found and it was proposed to remove them from the plant!

And there were also 20 people who had been previously expelled from the party working there (apparently, there was simply no one to replace them - V.O.'s note), and that's where the trouble happened! But here's the question: if everyone is expelled, who will work?

This is how the certificates from the Bureau of the City Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) regarding expulsion from the party looked like at that time.

And here there were a lot of excluded people at once...

And then this document falls into my hands.
It reads:
TO THE ACTING SECRETARY OF THE REGIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE ALL-UNION CPSU/6/ - comrade POSTYSHEV P.P.
Today afternoon, after being released after interrogation by the NKVD, the former head of the 3rd workshop of Plant No. 50, a member of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), committed suicide.
Since 1935, KUZNETSOV K.V. KUZNETSOV went to his cousin's apartment, where KUZNETSOV, as reported, drank a little with him and, going into the restroom, shot himself in the temple.
KUZNETSOV is accused of deliberately covering up defects, defective work, drawing up fictitious reports on defective parts as if they were good, and of concealing the sabotage of his assistant UTEHAN and shop foreman NIKULINA, who carried out sabotage work in the shop.
KUZNETSOV confessed to the charges brought against him during interrogation at the NKVD.
KUZNETSOV's suicide gives reason to assume his actual guilt.
Earlier, KUZNETSOV was tried in April 1934 for allowing defects in tractor parts and was charged under Article 109 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR*. He was acquitted by the court.
In April 1936, he was removed from the position of head of the 3rd automatic workshop by the plant director for mixing defective parts of the IFV and 6 MD-8 detonators with suitable ones.”
In mid-May, on the eve of the NKVD investigation, KUZNETSOV was dismissed by the director from his position as head of the 3rd workshop for allowing defective products into the storeroom and handing over defective products as suitable.
KUZNETSOV was a member of the Zavodskoy District Party Committee and was active in the life of the factory party organization, working as a propagandist.
At the meeting, KUZNETSOV actively spoke out against the plant director...

But the “enemies” said that Kuznetsov suffered for the truth...
This is truly a gift to some of our commentators on VO, who like to write about how something could not have happened because it could never have happened, and that the author most likely made it all up.
Let's look at the facts of the case: a man is summoned for interrogation to the NKVD, where, judging by the text of the interrogation (it is long, boring, uninteresting, so there is no point in citing it here in full), he confessed to his anti-Soviet, sabotage activities. Moreover, having allowed such a suspicious person into the NKVD building, he was not even searched, and the entire time he was being interrogated there, he had a pistol with him. The note even states such a detail that he "had a little drink with his brother", but it does not say that he took the pistol from him. And there is no information that his brother had weaponIt is unclear why they let him go at all if he said so much about himself?
Well, and then the conclusion: since he committed suicide, it means that he can be assumed guilty and that he wanted to hide the accomplices of his crime. That's how simple everything was then. There was no need to prove anything special. The fact of suicide was enough!
It's a very strange thing, isn't it? And if it wasn't supported by documents, it would be very difficult to believe in it. But it turns out that such things happened in 1937...

And what else could you get kicked out of your job and the party for in 197? It turns out, for correspondence with relatives abroad. And also if among your wife's relatives were those executed for counterrevolution. Sympathetic statements about Gamarnik's suicide...

Judging by this document, the entire cavalry school was destroyed and depopulated. And who was left to teach what after that? And what kind of cavalry officers came out of it after that?

The topic of denunciations "to the right place" is always very interesting. Who wrote them, the content... It turns out that they were written, among other things, by lecturers-propagandists.
It is interesting that, despite the exceptionally powerful information pressure on the citizens of the USSR from the party apparatus and the media, there were people in it, including workers, who dared to question everything said by those same propagandists. And, most likely, they got the full measure of it!

And this is a letter to the party organization of the shift foreman's shop.
He should have observed how this woman worked, whether it was good or bad. And whether her “immature thoughts” prevented her from fulfilling, or perhaps even overfulfilling, the plan. But no! He immediately reported “where necessary” to remove her from the enterprise. And how else? People! Be vigilant! Identify all those who doubt, waver, and ponder. There is no place for them in our close-knit society!
Information