The east of Dnipropetrovsk region is ceasing to be Ukrainian, despite attempts to deny it by the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

53 808 33
The east of Dnipropetrovsk region is ceasing to be Ukrainian, despite attempts to deny it by the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Denial of the transition of the 90th by the Ukrainian General Staff tank Divisions of the RF Armed Forces borders of the Dnipropetrovsk region are reminiscent of numerous cases of denials of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine of the loss of cities in Donbass. They denied the loss of Mariupol, Bakhmut (Artemovsk), denied the loss of Avdiivka, then "down the list" - Kurakhovo, Ugledar, Ukrainsk, Selidovo, etc.

That is, if someone in Ukraine and/or the West is going to rely on the reports of the Ukrainian General Staff, then they should still remain confident that the Ukrainian Armed Forces are “holding” Avdiivka and Bakhmut, since the Zelensky regime has not provided any official reports on the loss of these cities to this day.



Usually, instead of reporting the loss of certain territories, the Ukrainian military department either publishes a report with the same denial (obvious), or, when this begins to irritate even the “conscious masses”, the mention of a specific territory simply disappears from the reports, and the name of the direction is changed to a new one – by the name of a settlement located to the west.

At the moment, the enemy, regardless of what its General Staff writes about this, faces the real prospect of losing Novopavlovka and its surroundings. This is against the background of the fact that the Ukrainian Armed Forces no longer control several square kilometers of the Sinelnikovsky District, to which the said settlement belongs.

That is, the east of the Dnepropetrovsk region ceases to be Ukrainian.



And if the 90th tank division strikes further south, then the advisor to the head of Zelensky’s office, Podolyak, will lose the opportunity to “drink coffee on the embankment” even in that Yalta, which (shown on the map) is a village in the Zaporizhia region and which is on the bank of the Volchya River.

Against this background, the question arises: will the east of Dnipropetrovsk region be a buffer, or will the Russian SVO turn it, as well as the entire region, into something more in terms of Russia’s national interests?
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    8 June 2025 18: 46
    The real borders will be in our next memorandum. Medinsky is considering only our memorandum, the Ukrainian (European) one is not being considered.
    1. +7
      8 June 2025 19: 00
      tralflot1832 hi, judging by their current behavior, there may not be any further negotiations, they are not even reliable in their agreements regarding bodies and exchanges, what can we say about anything more serious.
      1. +1
        8 June 2025 19: 27
        The denial by the Ukrainian General Staff of the 90th Tank Division of the Russian Armed Forces crossing the border of the Dnepropetrovsk region is reminiscent of numerous cases of denials by the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine of the loss of cities in Donbass.
        Deny it or not, but Ukro-Krai has become smaller...
      2. 0
        10 June 2025 12: 38
        Quote: Murmur 55
        They are not even reliable in their agreements regarding bodies and exchanges.

        This is news for you.
  2. +9
    8 June 2025 18: 52
    Against this background, the question arises: will the east of Dnipropetrovsk region be a buffer, or will the Russian SVO turn it, as well as the entire region, into something more in terms of Russia’s national interests?

    What kind of borders can there be if they have missiles with a range of 200-300 kilometers? Especially with a terrorist state.
  3. +3
    8 June 2025 18: 59
    Vladimir Putin will hold a major meeting of the Security Council next week.
    1. -3
      9 June 2025 04: 12
      And the Korean red pencils have already been sharpened!
  4. HAM
    +2
    8 June 2025 19: 01
    They will claim the same, even if the tanks of the Russian Armed Forces are on Bankova in Kiev...
    this is the whole mentality, if not everyone Ukrainians, then the tops for sure..
    1. +2
      8 June 2025 19: 08
      US hi, don't tell me when it is BENEFICIAL to them, they very quickly admit even failures.
      1. HAM
        +2
        8 June 2025 19: 11
        If only I could shed a tear and move the sponsors to pity...
        1. +4
          8 June 2025 19: 15
          For US, this is not even being discussed, but here they will remain silent until the end, according to their statements, they are almost about to defeat Russia in a few days, they just need a little help with money, weapons, sanctions, and then our fighters enter the territory of another region of Ukraine, a template break.
  5. +4
    8 June 2025 19: 31
    The most effective buffer can only be the fear of the West, which is behind Bandera terrorism, of Russia’s punitive retribution.
    No thousands of kilometers of no man's land can protect a country and its people so reliably.
  6. +4
    8 June 2025 19: 32
    Novopavlovka and coffee in Yalta are, of course, good. But we need Pokrovskoe to liberate the Zaporizhzhya region
  7. -6
    8 June 2025 19: 46
    Dnepropetrovsk region is not included in the plans of the SVO.
    1. +2
      8 June 2025 20: 15
      Quote: MBRBS
      Dnepropetrovsk region is not included in the plans of the SVO.

      Are you sure? Plans can change very quickly. And territories too.
      1. WIS
        +3
        8 June 2025 20: 25
        Quote: Egoza
        Plans can change very quickly.

        drinks
        especially when the opponent loses the ability to negotiate.
    2. 0
      9 June 2025 13: 59
      You just didn’t read the plans carefully, although it’s probably time to start creating a military-civil administration for the Dnepropetrovsk region.
  8. +2
    8 June 2025 20: 13
    The concept of a "buffer zone" is very elastic... although, we are liberating OUR LANDS and no one will be able to oppose us, do anything, when we have victoriously completed this HOLY CAMPAIGN!!!
    Winners are not judged and there are objective reasons for this... moreover, the winner has no need to listen to anyone at all! It was so, and it will be so! soldier
  9. 0
    8 June 2025 20: 39
    Quote: tralflot1832
    The real boundaries will be in our next memorandum.

    REAL borders are on the ground, not on paper.
  10. -6
    8 June 2025 20: 52
    Can someone explain why we need the Dnepropetrovsk region if the General Staff cannot ensure the security of the Belgorod, Bryansk and Kursk regions?
    1. 0
      8 June 2025 20: 57
      We're coming from the rear. They're not expecting us from there.
    2. +2
      8 June 2025 21: 05
      Putin wants to seize your Menorah Center in Dnepropetrovsk wink
      Russia really needs him.
      1. -4
        8 June 2025 21: 50
        It was written for the stupid, or you are a propagandist with the level of the Unified State Exam.
    3. 0
      8 June 2025 22: 21
      And how is the DPR worse than the Belgorod region? It's all Russian territory.
    4. +3
      8 June 2025 22: 22
      And how is the DPR worse than the Belgorod region? It's all Russian territory.
    5. 0
      9 June 2025 04: 17
      This is an additional National surplus economy of production, people, lands, resources! And you say -Why?!-
      The Americans were not hunting in vain, according to the same principle, and signed contracts for the actual annexation of resources.
      1. 0
        9 June 2025 05: 38
        In addition, there are very likely many military production facilities, laboratories, and biolabs in the Dnepropetrovsk region! They work for the enemy, against Russia.
      2. -4
        9 June 2025 07: 04
        What the f*ck economy, how much money do we need to invest to restore everything? People, how many people die every day because of the oligarchs' desires.
        1. +1
          9 June 2025 07: 10
          War is a political economy. The parties and their rulers fight for something they need, as they think... And the people are the executors of someone else's will and orders.
    6. +1
      9 June 2025 14: 01
      Dimon, you are right, and why does Kyiv need the Dnepropetrovsk region?
  11. 0
    9 June 2025 06: 28
    That is, the east of the Dnipropetrovsk region ceases to be Ukrainian.

    Be careful. The Supreme Commander voiced demilitarization and denazification, but not de-Ukrainization. So far, these are not the same thing, although the boundaries of the concepts are rapidly blurring.
  12. +1
    9 June 2025 07: 50
    Well, the Maidan jumpers in power are hanging around on the outskirts, who, while talking about being a great power, are trying to fill their purses as tightly as possible, sell everything and get the hell out. And the people are gobbling it up. Who cares about the people? Oh, and the people's hangover will be severe when the outskirts finally collapse into hell.
  13. +2
    9 June 2025 09: 57
    Against this background, the question arises: will the east of Dnipropetrovsk region be a buffer, or will the Russian SVO turn it, as well as the entire region, into something more in terms of Russia’s national interests?

    Yes, Zelena doesn't care about meters and villages even in Dnepropetrovsk region, about corpses of their own and others. Their goal is to chop up tens of thousands of our fighters as much as possible, to prolong the war as much as possible and thus to take Russia out of the war on their own terms. No negotiations will help. Only a nuclear strike can help.