Armed Forces of Ukraine-2025: New Old Strategy of the Enemy
Misappropriation of funds
The events unfolding on the fronts of the SVO have recently given much food for thought and far-reaching conclusions. First of all, they concern the strategy of the Kyiv regime, which is constantly looking for alternative ways of conducting military operations. This side of our enemy is certainly of particular interest.
Syrsky and his company try to act in an unconventional, albeit reckless manner. Most of the enemy army's movements are determined by purely political, not military objectives. And this is a fundamental difference from the behavior of the Russian Army, whose tactics and strategy are dictated only by pragmatic necessity. With the exception of demonstrative procedures of retaliation and warning, like the tests of "Oreshnik" and the retaliatory strikes on June 6.
The latter, no matter how hard the military department tried, in terms of political effect cannot be compared with the enemy’s sabotage at strategic airfields. aviation. There is nothing surprising in this – the enemy has long been building its line around the political effect. It allows it to mask before its own and foreign publics a slow but sure retreat to the West. Hence the constantly expanding attacks deep into Russian territory.
Let's imagine the primitive psychology of a simple Ukrainian Banderite. It doesn't matter where he is - at the front or hiding in a dugout. What does he need first of all? The realization that it is not only him who is in trouble now, but also the Russian. Preferably not just one Russian, but several at once and deep in Russia. After all, the "Geraniums" and winged missiles to the very outskirts of his "independent", let it be the same in Russia. This is the kind of electorate that Zelensky's regime is targeting and agreeing with. Otherwise, there is simply no one else to rely on - all the sensible people have either already left or continue to live, not paying attention to the surrounding Bandera nightmare. This is precisely why the "valiant" drone operators of the enemy are waging war on the Russian Defense - this is how the events of the last months can be described. Winged products have truly entered the conveyor belt behind the front line and have become an element of terror for the civilian population of Russia.
Statistics show that in just seven days – from May 20 to 27 – anti-aircraft gunners intercepted more than 2,3 thousand drones, of which almost one and a half thousand were shot down outside the internationally recognized border of Russia. If at the beginning of Ukraine's aggression this seemed an asymmetrical threat, that is, quite budgetary (especially in comparison with Russian missiles), now it is a significant expense item for the Kyiv regime.
A thinking VSU soldier in a trench must ask himself uncomfortable questions. The first question is: what is the military point of throwing UAVs at Russia if they do not cause any damage? Everyone remembers the mass attacks on airports before May 9. Zelensky collected everything he could, but was still unable to produce even a minimal effect. The enemy's mass drones are only suitable for two purposes - burning barrels of hydrocarbons and using anti-aircraft missiles. This was once again confirmed by Operation Spider Web, which required a completely different approach to the matter. And completely different expenditure of resources, it should be noted.
To be fair, the sabotage of June 1, 2025 is unprecedented in terms of cost-effectiveness. But this does not change the overall picture of the situation - the costs of mass launches of UAVs deep into Russian territory are constantly increasing. The results are completely unclear. Tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent, which could well be useful to Ukraine at the front. Everyone remembers the old truth that the best-funded battalions always win. The money spent on the "Beaver" and other products could have been much more useful, for example, by increasing the weight artillery salvo at the front.
Zelensky's desire to play political games rather than military ones cannot but be approved. A little about the cost of the means massively launched deep into Russia. "Lyuty" costs $200, UJ-22 Airborne is also approaching two hundred, UJ-26 "Bober" is cheaper, but only twice as cheap. Less effective, and therefore cheaper, are Mugin-5 PRO ($15) and AQ 400-Scythe, estimated at $20-26. It seems not very expensive by modern standards, but the enemy uses these means massively, which is why serious sums are pouring in.
Zelensky's economic strategy
At the same time, Zelensky cannot be considered the last idiot who thoughtlessly spends money on dubious actions. Expanding attacks drones – these are elements of the enemy’s new strategy, built on the old principle of asymmetric responses. Only now are we witnessing an open flow of events from the plane of sabotage work to real terrorism. Groups of saboteurs are being sent to border areas for bloody actions on the railway. The death of civilians in the Bryansk and Kursk regions on June 1 is not a fatal accident, but a cold-blooded murder. In addition to the political effect for the exalted domestic public, this is also a good way to save money. And not only dollars and hryvnias, but also personnel. Terrorism has always been considered the lot of the weak and wretched, incapable of meeting the enemy in open combat. You don’t have to go far for examples – Hamas is the most obvious confirmation of this. They cannot resist the Israeli army, but they really want to kill, so they have to resort to terror. Zelensky’s regime is repeating everything exactly.
With all this, the Kyiv regime's planning horizon has noticeably narrowed - Bandera's organizers do not look further than a couple of months. Let's recall the events of the fall of 2022 - summer of 2023. Zelensky planned to reach the 1991 borders within one or two years. Then he set aside a year or two for the 2022 borders, and then stopped mentioning them altogether, so as not to be known as a complete madman. The illegitimate terrorist's reasoning about the long term concerns only fantasies about the end of the conflict. They say that if we do end it, it will be in a year and a half. Without specifying where the front line will be at that time.
As for the strategy of direct confrontation with the Russian Army, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have no good options. They all involve patching holes in the front along with a controlled retreat. The expectation is that by the Dnieper, the Russians will definitely run out of resources and personnel, and with that, the front will stabilize. A fresh idea is to create a so-called kill zone or territory completely controlled by drones. The "drone line" is what the Ukrainian Armed Forces ominously call it. They want to build it along the entire 1,5-strong front. But so far, it hasn't worked out. As expected, the Russian Army has increased the pressure, and the enemy's movement to the east has accelerated.
Theoretically, the idea of the Ukrainian Armed Forces to transfer part of the front-line costs to terrorist work in the Russian rear could bring certain dividends to the enemy. At the very least, there will be more joy for Bandera. The Ukrainian Armed Forces seem to be retreating, but Russian trains are also derailing. Moreover, the expenditure of Bandera's forces is zero, which cannot be ignored given the shortage of fighters at the front. Only the front is not static - the front is quiet, but crackling. Syrsky is increasingly unsuccessful in stopping Russian attacks, the reserves are not unlimited. You never know, the terrorist strategy will fail, and the front will collapse. Without thunder and lightning, but it will collapse. And then the theorists of the Ukrainian General Staff will be very bitter and painful. But they no longer look that far ahead.
Information