On what happened on June 1: Ukrainians have clearly become skilled in terrorism and sabotage

25 672 130
On what happened on June 1: Ukrainians have clearly become skilled in terrorism and sabotage

The fact is, of course, terrible, but there is no point in denying it: over the years of the special military operation, various types of sabotage and terrorist acts organized by Ukrainian special services on Russian territory have become commonplace. This concerns not only minor dirty tricks by young and not so young degenerates who burn relay cabinets and other infrastructure facilities under the direction of curators from the "independent" country, but also assassination attempts on high-ranking officials.

However, what happened on June 1, 2025, can in no way be called a “routine” sabotage, since the Ukrainians’ target was our strategic aviation. According to some domestic OSINT researchers, several bombers carrying nuclear weapons were damaged or destroyed. weapons. And, I must say, news This became a real bucket of ice water for everyone, including the West - many even called this event a repeat of Pearl Harbor.



There is no particular point in going into detail about the reaction to this event - everything is crystal clear. In the West, they once again started shouting about Ukraine allegedly putting Russia on its knees on the eve of the negotiations. In our country, gritting their teeth, they once again started talking about red lines, nuclear retaliation, individual protective hangars for aircraft and the inaction of the FSB and other organizations that should have prevented what happened.

Something else is more important here.

The Ukrainian special services, not disdaining such methods of warfare, are constantly improving their skills, moving on to more and more sophisticated methods. Previously, their "actions" were not particularly complex - even in the case of the blowing up of the Crimean Bridge and the murders of a number of high-ranking officials, everything was done clumsily and according to the classic scheme in the style of "deliver the explosives and blow them up." Now, as we can see, the evolution of sabotage activities has already brought it to a completely different level.


Equipment of "summer cottages" dronesThe drones were positioned in the space between the metal roof and the wooden ceiling.

No fools with Molotov cocktails, no "foreign specialists" with mined scooters. The perpetrators were people who had been preparing this attack for a long time. And we are talking not only about UAV operators (it is highly doubtful that drones with "artificial intelligence" were used for the attack; most likely, they were controlled via the Internet), but also those who were preparing the sabotage directly on the ground - those who equipped Drones explosives, placing them in launching positions in trucks, etc.

And the organization of this terrorist act itself, without any exaggeration, can be characterized with the words: “a mosquito couldn’t get its nose under it.”

First of all, this concerns camouflage - in a number of media outlets, the objects on trucks from which drones were launched are often called containers or even entire launchers. In fact, of course, these are launchers, but it sounds so menacing, as if some kind of "Grad" was transported on a trailer and not inspected. They even began to accuse the drivers of being so careless (if they really did not know about the contents of the cargo) and did not bother to look at what they were transporting. However, in fact, there is nothing to look at there.

"Launchers" or "containers" are ordinary cabins/summer houses, which are widely used for human habitation. They cannot a priori arouse any suspicion, since both outside and inside they are ordinary transportable "houses", which are possibly mass-produced by some Russian enterprise. There is a possibility that for greater authenticity there were even some pieces of furniture inside, such as a table nailed to the floor or wall.

They were already being converted into "launchers" in a hangar/garage in Chelyabinsk (according to preliminary data), with drones placed in the spaces between the metal roof and the internal wooden ceiling. Solar panels were placed on top of the roof, which apparently served as a power source for recharging the drones while the truck was transporting them to their destination.


Upon arrival at their destination, the roofs of the solar panel "houses" were automatically or possibly manually folded aside for the drones to fly out. The roof is lying to the left of the truck.

In such a design, you can't find fault with the cargo, even if you really want to. A portable cabin/summer cottage, and even with solar panels - beautiful, fashionable, technologically advanced. The catch can only be found with the help of trained dogs or an X-ray scanner, but this is only at border control.

Everything was also taken into account with transportation. The trucks were purchased or rented/leased (the investigation will establish this) by a private individual, so it most likely did not provide any reports on transportation, including financial ones, even to the tax office. This circumstance actually gave freedom of action to the organizers of the sabotage and allowed them to avoid unnecessary checks and concerns about the sender's documents if they had decided to use the services of transport companies.

In fact, it all looked as if the owner of the truck wanted to put a portable cabin in his dacha, so he asked a driver through connections to take him there - you don't even need to make a fake certificate about the cargo in case of inspection. It is enough to show the relevant documents for the officially made cabin. No one will open the roof on the road and examine the secret contents - at most they will look inside, and nothing more.

As for the drones themselves. Now they say that they could have been imported through Kazakhstan or some other neighboring country. It is too early to deny or refute this, but the assumption is quite reasonable if we are talking about specially modified copters with a high load capacity, a long flight range and the ability to control the flight remotely via the mobile Internet.

Unfortunately, it is quite possible to import such cargo, especially if the copters were transported in bulk, having given money to the appropriate persons and having registered it all as some truck with onions or tomatoes - no one has yet cancelled corruption. And it is very difficult to find the ends later, if at all possible. Although there are no difficulties in the case of purchasing a UAV already in Russia with the appropriate modifications already "in the garage" - our laws are liberal in this regard, since the registration of an officially purchased copter is voluntary.


In general, the sabotage carried out by Ukraine resembles the notorious Israeli operation with pagers, when Israeli special services remotely detonated pagers filled with explosives in order to kill and, so to speak, "disable" people belonging to Hamas. Now we are seeing a similar level of preparation and technological sophistication, but this time on the part of Ukrainian special services, operating not on the battlefield, but deep in our rear. This is evidence not just of the evolution of methods, but of the adoption of experience and, perhaps, even the receipt of direct advisory assistance from foreign allies.

What is especially alarming is that the tendency to increase the number and complexity of such operations may not stop even after the end of, so to speak, the “hot” phase of the SVO. Ukraine may maintain and even increase its subversive activity of this kind, turning it into a permanent activity, supported ideologically and institutionally. So there is a possibility that the threat may persist for many years.

This is why our special services need to change their focus and seriously engage in systemic strengthening of internal counterintelligence and logistics control. Issues of inspection, registration, movement of cargo, sources of financing and communications of potential saboteurs should be dealt with not after the fact, but preventively. Resources should be directed primarily to neutralizing such threats within the country, because the belief that defense and strategic facilities will be afraid of massive attacks was not very strong before, and after June 1, 2025, it disappeared altogether.
130 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    6 June 2025 03: 45
    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the planes will be restored, there is nothing to worry about, so we don’t worry at all. In short, we’re leaving.
    1. +16
      6 June 2025 04: 36
      Let's disperse because rallies are prohibited (((

      I also think that nothing will change(((

      Need to change... Goal setting
      1. -1
        6 June 2025 19: 20
        And more girls in the brothel, instead of rearranging the beds.
    2. +11
      6 June 2025 05: 25
      Until this "NVO-non-war" is finally called a war, and sabotage actions are called guerrilla warfare, it is unlikely that anything will fundamentally change. NVO is being conducted as a national project with all the attributes - a shift to the right, fluctuations in goal-setting, the absence of a Victory strategy. And it is not surprising - after all, this "NVO-non-war" is not Patriotic, not Great, not People's, not Liberation, not Patriotic.

      The BBC writes that the success of this military operation demonstrated the will to fight and proved the validity of Ukraine's "trump cards", not to mention the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Unfortunately, we have to agree with this. This is what "systematic grinding" and the hope for Ukraine's military exhaustion as a military strategy leads to.

      And military defeats are compensated (and not always) only by military victories - this is an axiom of military affairs and art.
      1. -21
        6 June 2025 07: 37
        The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

        Quote: Mikhail Drabkin
        Until it is "SVO- non-war"

        Yesterday, in connection with the latest terrorist attacks, Putin effectively reclassified the SVO as a counter-terrorist operation, the Ukrainian leadership was recognized as terrorists, and everyone who helps them is an assistant to terrorists. This was announced after Trump's phone call. Apparently, Trump agrees with our president's conclusions.
        1. +3
          6 June 2025 23: 00
          The SVO in Ukraine has been going on for four years, and to date there are no legal documents in the Russian Federation (decree, law, resolution) that would state what the SVO is, define the SVO, or indicate the goals and strategy of the SVO in Ukraine. The question of why there are no legal documents on the SVO in Ukraine should be asked to V.V. Putin. 98% of military actions are being conducted on the territory of the Russian Federation (see map), as prescribed by the Constitution, these are the LPR and DPR, Kherson, Zaporozhye, Kursk, and Belgorod regions. The law "On Counteracting Terrorism" dated 06.03.2006 N 35-FZ is in effect in the combat zone on the territory of the Russian Federation. Ukraine's attack on Russia and occupation of Russian territory are clearly visible, missile, bomb, and drone strikes are also being carried out on Russian territory, and a sabotage war is being waged from the Ukrainian side.
          In March 2022, I proposed to issue a law of the Russian Federation which would state that the entire territory of Ukraine, within the 1975 borders (Helsinki Accords), is an integral part of Russia.
          In the presence of the Law, the military operation conducted by Russia in Ukraine is the liberation of the territory of Russia occupied by separatists, the restoration of the territorial integrity of Russia, the reunification of peoples, the inclusion of the economy, population, territory of Ukraine in the sphere of economic activity of Russia.
      2. -22
        6 June 2025 07: 44
        The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

        Quote: Mikhail Drabkin
        The BBC writes that

        Are you getting your information from this puddle?
    3. +10
      6 June 2025 09: 00
      The Foreign Ministry said that the planes will be restored

      Yes, Ryabkov's statement was like that - apparently he himself will restore...
      This is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and not some Ministry of Industry and Trade...
    4. +1
      6 June 2025 16: 27
      this is all that our MFA can do. Conclusions will most likely not be made again, but it is becoming obvious that our strategic nuclear forces are very vulnerable, the aviation and naval parts, and mobile complexes can be destroyed or damaged by penny drones even in the current conflict. Only the silo launchers are normally protected. The current conflict has shown that protective structures, hangars, boxes are needed for all equipment, even that which is very far from the front line.
      1. +1
        6 June 2025 19: 22
        >Only the silos are normally protected.
        Are you sure?
        https://dzen.ru/a/aELpQf3ieUxNrCRx
  2. +16
    6 June 2025 04: 03
    Resources should be directed first and foremost to neutralizing such threats within the country, because the belief that defense and strategic facilities would be afraid of massive attacks was not very strong before, and after June 1, 2025, it disappeared altogether.

    Should...Necessary...Required...
    The whole world saw the true value of the Russian president's promises, and I felt ashamed that the country was being led by such people...
    1. -32
      6 June 2025 04: 33
      Should...Necessary...Required...
      The whole world saw the true value of the Russian president's promises, and I felt ashamed that the country was being led by such people.
      So, in your opinion, the president is obliged to deal with everything personally? Who told you that the president, and not the Aerospace Forces command, should deal with the same hangars for aircraft? Maybe Putin should also personally go mix concrete?! Or personally inspect every truck leaving for a flight?
      1. +39
        6 June 2025 05: 28
        Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
        Who told you that the president, and not the Aerospace Forces command, should be in charge of the same hangars for aircraft? Maybe Putin should personally go mix concrete?! Or personally inspect every truck leaving for a flight?

        The person who monopolizes power in the state automatically takes on all responsibility. Referring to "bad boyars" who are impenetrably stupid will not work because he himself appointed them, the people did not participate in this.
        1. -12
          6 June 2025 14: 54
          A person who monopolizes power in a state
          Firstly, Putin was elected. And he personally did not monopolize anything. Secondly, the president is the executive power. Not the legislative one. How did he "monopolize" power?! If you are sure of this, you can safely go to court.
          Referring to the "bad boyars" who are incredibly stupid will not work because he appointed them himself, and the people did not participate in this.
          The president does not appoint regimental commanders. They are appointed by the higher command. And the responsibility for insufficient camouflage lies with both the regimental commanders and the airfield services. And not with the president, and not with the "boyars".
          Everyone does their job.
          1. +3
            7 June 2025 08: 40
            How did he "monopolize" power?!

            The State Council "determines foreign and domestic policy." The State Council is "formed" by the president.
            1. -4
              7 June 2025 13: 10
              The State Council "determines foreign and domestic policy." The State Council is "formed" by the president.
              How many people are there in the State Council?
              The President forms the government. Yes, he gives orders, sets tasks. But he does not carry them out himself, but those who are responsible for each specific area carry them out.
              1. +1
                7 June 2025 13: 32
                Article 83 of the Constitution, paragraph 5.
          2. -1
            15 June 2025 19: 59
            No need to write here as a provocateur. Everyone in Russia and the world understands that there is no such body that would limit Putin. He appoints senior officials, he should control them. And what do we see? All the thieving bigwigs from the Ministry of Defense, headed by Shoigu, are Putin's buddies. Where is Taburetkin now, who destroyed military education? Putin's friend. And now the troops are short of officers and so on. So no need for blah-blah here. Everyone already understands what country he is a patriot of. And it is definitely not Russia.
        2. -2
          6 June 2025 20: 46
          Quote: Puncher
          The person who monopolizes power in the state automatically takes on all responsibility. Referring to "bad boyars" who are impenetrably stupid will not work because he himself appointed them, the people did not participate in this.

          Sounds right, but what about Stalin who appointed the NKVD People's Commissars and others - who had to be shot like dogs? The people definitely did not participate in this...
          1. +4
            7 June 2025 05: 16
            Quote: your1970
            What then should we do with Stalin, who appointed the People's Commissars of the NKVD and others - who had to be shot like dogs?

            He appointed, and he also put him under the knife. It was his decision in both cases.
      2. +25
        6 June 2025 06: 21
        Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
        Should...Necessary...Required...
        The whole world saw the true value of the Russian president's promises, and I felt ashamed that the country was being led by such people.
        So, in your opinion, the president is obliged to deal with everything personally? Who told you that the president, and not the Aerospace Forces command, should deal with the same hangars for aircraft? Maybe Putin should also personally go mix concrete?! Or personally inspect every truck leaving for a flight?

        Even for a dilettante grandfather, this is very childish. Teenager level - although that may be so.
        Does the company director do everything himself? Or are there (depending on the company's profile) department heads, workshop managers, foremen or project leaders?
        And if after 25 years with the company they are incapable and constantly make mistakes - what happens?
        They are kicked out, blacklisted.
        What happens to a company where everyone doesn’t do everything and the director has nothing to do with it?
        She's going broke.
        1. +7
          6 June 2025 07: 13
          "Does the director of the company do everything himself?" And this already depends on the qualifications of his deputies. If the deputies correspond to the positions they hold, then the director will control and count the profit. If not, then he will plow himself.
          1. -1
            6 June 2025 23: 43
            Well, yes, and he will wash the floors and windows himself? He is completely sick and you, papas-57, with him too. I am exaggerating of course.
        2. -7
          6 June 2025 14: 56
          Does the company director do everything himself? Or are there (depending on the company's profile) department heads, workshop managers, foremen or project leaders?
          Why are you being so figurative? Who exactly do you mean?
          What happens to a company where everyone doesn’t do everything and the director has nothing to do with it?
          She's going broke.
          I didn't notice that we went bankrupt in Russia...
        3. -2
          6 June 2025 20: 17
          Quote from tsvetahaki
          What happens to a company where everyone doesn’t do everything and the director has nothing to do with it?
          She's going broke.

          Hence the conclusion: Russia is not an enterprise where "everyone does not do everything and the director has nothing to do with it". Russia is not bankrupt, it is not ruined. Despite the fact that it has been fighting a high-tech enemy for three years, the country has not been put on "war footing" and lives a basically peaceful life. If you want to say that everything is lost here, then you are lying or panicking for no particular reason. Yes, they missed the blow... So what? A bayonet in the ground and a white flag? Even in the context of the upcoming war in the European theater of military operations, the loss of a dozen 70-year-old aircraft is not fatal. They will be replaced at short distances by the same Su-34s, which are quite capable of using the weapons (missiles) of the lost carriers. Yes, they are not strategists. But for Europe, given the developed air defense, the significance of the Tu-95 as a strategist is very ambiguous. The blow itself is a manifestation of clinical idiocy, but it is very painful and instructive. It's always like that in war: if you don't get a beating, you won't learn. By the way, the IVS also initially resorted to emotional and ill-considered decisions. In the summer of 41, it shot the command staff for no reason. Then came the understanding - generals need to be taught and protected. And yes, the IVS would have brought order here, in the VO. Even the most literate commentators would have whispered words of criticism of the leadership only under the sounds of a flush tank. wink By the way, about the director. He consistently maintains a rating of 82%. Smart guys, who will get at least one percent? laughing
        4. 0
          6 June 2025 20: 47
          Quote from tsvetahaki
          Does the company director do everything himself? Or are there (depending on the company's profile) department heads, workshop managers, foremen or project leaders?
          And if after 25 years with the company they are incapable and constantly make mistakes - what happens?
          They are kicked out, blacklisted.
          What happens to a company where everyone doesn’t do everything and the director has nothing to do with it?
          She's going broke.
          - USSR, no???
      3. +12
        6 June 2025 07: 59
        So, in your opinion, the president is obliged to deal with everything personally?...


        Dear Andrey.
        Regardless of whether the President will “personally” or “not personally” solve the emerging problems of the State, responsibility always falls on the Leader.

        "...Almost two-thirds of Russians believe that Vladimir Putin bears full responsibility for the problems facing the country - this is the highest figure for the entire period of research, according to data from the Levada Center. The share of such Russians is 61%. Another 22% believe that he bears responsibility for them "to some extent". A year ago, 55% of Russians spoke of the president's full responsibility, while another 21% considered the president's responsibility partial. In March 2014, the share of such people was 82%, but only 52% of them spoke of Putin's full responsibility...."
        https://www.levada.ru/2018/11/22/bolshinstvo-rossiyan-vozlozhili-otvetstvennost-za-problemy-strany-na-putina/

        "...In his inauguration speech, the new president admitted that he understands that he is taking on a huge responsibility. "And I know that in Russia, the head of state has always been and will be the person who is responsible for everything that happens in the country," Putin said then...."
        https://tass.ru/politika/1952758

        "The responsibility for everything that happens in the country always rests with the head of state, and further down the rankings," the president said during the annual press conference.
        https://ria.ru/20141218/1038992763.html

        "..."As I assume the office of President of Russia, I am especially acutely aware of my colossal responsibility to each of you, to our entire multinational people, responsibility to Russia... - Putin said on Monday in the Kremlin during the inauguration ceremony...
        https://www.interfax.ru/elections2018/611588
        1. -8
          6 June 2025 16: 21
          Dear Alexander, my janitor appears in the yard from time to time. Should I blame the president for this, or maybe the management company? Or should the president personally start sweeping the yard of my house with a broom every morning?..
          If you didn't understand, that's the question. Should Putin deal with all the little problems of every citizen of our country, or should he just give orders to the people in charge?
          The president has a responsibility, he has a duty to all citizens of Russia. And not to each one individually. He is NOT obliged to hammer nails into the wall, clean the sewer, and so on. His field of activity is a little different. So that the country lives normally, is protected from external and internal aggression, imports and exports various goods. So that children receive an education, so that citizens receive medical care... He has a lot of responsibilities, but he is responsible to all citizens of the Russian Federation, and not to each one personally.
          1. 0
            6 June 2025 16: 49
            Thank you.
            I understood you.
      4. +12
        6 June 2025 08: 11
        The President is obliged to control and punish in case of non-compliance. So far, there are no loud dismissals and imprisonments
        1. -18
          6 June 2025 08: 25
          The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

          Quote: Jackson
          The President is obliged to monitor and punish in case of non-compliance.

          Punish those who do not comply with the Laws, and if the Law is not broken, then there is no one to punish.

          Putin determines foreign and domestic policy, but Medvedev shapes domestic policy. All questions to Medvedev, not Putin. Putin respects the laws.
          1. +4
            6 June 2025 14: 08
            Boris, you are incorrigible.

            On this site you are "driven into a corner" every time you try to separate the president from the actions or inactions of senior officials.

            If he had not satisfied the Russian elites, he would not have been able to remain in power for so many terms.
        2. -5
          6 June 2025 16: 57
          So far, no loud suspensions or arrests have been heard.
          And do they necessarily have to be loud? Hmm... I think you don't know our current reality very well.
          1. +4
            6 June 2025 17: 44
            Well, our failures are loud, but solutions to the problems are not visible? So it is not surprising that the population sees only the failures of the government and is indignant, since the government hides its virtues in an incomprehensible place and for an incomprehensible reason fool
            1. -5
              6 June 2025 18: 01
              Well, our failures are loud, but we can’t see solutions to the problems?
              The failure was loud, but the effectiveness of the failure was very questionable...
              Solutions to problems in this area, when there are BDs, are usually kept secret by smart people.
              And idiots, forgive me, put it on display.
              1. 0
                6 June 2025 18: 20
                here is the effectiveness of failure - very questionable...
                Well, yes, women will give birth to more planes, just minus ten percent of strategists at a time fool
                And probably now they are all already in hangars and no one is going to finish them, because they were all caught and the border is locked
                Solutions to problems in this area, when there are BDs, are usually kept secret by smart people.
                Judging by the fact that this is not the first flight - I remember back in the summer of 2022, four Il-76s were burned by Mavics - they did not look for solutions to the problems at all. Well, except for the tires.
                And the results of the retaliatory strikes are kept secret. Well, so that it would be convenient for the politicians, well, in general, come up with something for yourselves...
                1. -6
                  6 June 2025 18: 48
                  Well, yes, women will give birth to more planes, just minus ten percent of strategists at a time
                  How far will the Tu-95 fly after takeoff, in the event of a global conflict? How many meters will they fly, I say?
                  Strategic aviation airfields are one of the enemy's priority targets. Quite a few Tomahawks are aimed at them. And since, according to American doctrine, a strike can be preventive, and according to ours - more of a counterattack than a preemptive one, the result will be the total destruction of the "Bears".
                  Like the Tu-22, "Backfire".
                  Judging by the fact that this is not the first flight - I remember back in the summer of 2022, four Il-76s were burned by Mavics - they did not look for a solution to the problems at all.
                  Everyone is free to make their own assessments.
                  But let me remind you that in the strategic perspective we are winning so far. And this means that the Supreme Command is doing everything right.
                  1. +4
                    6 June 2025 19: 02
                    How long will the Tu-95 fly after takeoff, in the event of a global conflict?
                    the more strategists there are, the further they will fly
                    There are quite a few Tomahawks aimed at them.
                    they fly at subsonic speed, they will not reach the Irkutsk region in two minutes, like drones
                    the result will be the total destruction of the "Bears".
                    Like the Tu-22, "Backfire".
                    planes are not needed, thanks to the SBU I guess? fool
                    The planes will be destroyed, but before that they will either shoot back with missiles or not. The more of them there are, the more will be returned. Or do you think that it doesn't matter what happens to the Americans, let them live? negative
                    But let me remind you that from a strategic perspective we are still winning.
                    noticeably as we win. The reduction in the number of strategists probably contributes to this? Like fewer strategists - fewer missiles for the Americans according to their strategy, which means more missiles will fly at other targets, and the Americans will live more peacefully, right? Or is the Americans and strategists some kind of fairy tale, and we strategically are about to squeeze out Chasov Yar and Volchansk and there will be victory, the credits will roll, end of story? fool
                    1. -6
                      6 June 2025 19: 09
                      the more strategists there are, the further they will fly

                      These are not ants, but airplanes.
                      they fly at subsonic speed, they will not reach the Irkutsk region in two minutes, like drones
                      They may not have time to take off at all.
                      planes are not needed, thanks to the SBU I guess I should say? fool
                      The planes will be destroyed, but before that they will either shoot back with missiles or not. The more of them there are, the more will be returned. Or do you think that it doesn't matter what happens to the Americans, let them live? negative
                      They won't shoot back. It will be faster to get a Tu-160 into the air than a Tu-95. By that time, cruise missiles will have already arrived at the airfield.
                      The rest will be intercepted.
                      noticeably as we win. The reduction in the number of strategists probably contributes to this? Like fewer strategists - fewer missiles for the Americans according to their strategy, which means more missiles will fly at other targets, and the Americans live more peacefully, right? Or is the Americans and strategists some kind of fairy tale, and we strategically are about to squeeze out Chasov Yar and Volchansk and there will be victory, the credits will roll, end of story? fool

                      And what do the Americans have to do with it at all, at this moment? And the strategists, by the way, too? We'll even put the squeeze on Lvov. Without the strategists. The attack aircraft will put the squeeze on them. And the outdated planes are a good addition, but nothing more.
                      1. +3
                        6 June 2025 19: 22
                        These are not ants, but airplanes
                        what a profound thought!
                        They may not have time to take off at all.
                        and they might make it in time. Anyone might not make it in time, including SSBNs for example. If they sink Borei - will you also say that it doesn't matter?
                        They won't shoot back. It will be faster to get a Tu-160 into the air than a Tu-95.
                        tested in training?
                        During this time, cruise missiles will already arrive at the airfield.
                        The rest will be intercepted.
                        Where will they fly from? How did you calculate? And if they accidentally manage to refuel? And if the pilots are nearby? Then they won't take off during the threatening period?
                        The rest will be intercepted.
                        who, where from?
                        And what do the Americans have to do with this at all, at the moment? And strategists, by the way, too?
                        They say that strategists, along with the rest, prevent the Americans and others from interfering, who have nothing to do with it, no? Or if they have nothing to do with it, then maybe the strategists should be written off?
                        We will even squeeze Lvov. Without strategists. Stormtroopers will squeeze
                        Are you by any chance a general from the General Staff who thinks that his eagles will somehow finish him off on their own, and he doesn’t even have to bother?
                        And the outdated planes are a good addition, but nothing more.
                        obsolete aircraft are younger than any of our generals, I suggest writing off the latter, since their thoughts do not go beyond tires fool
      5. +11
        6 June 2025 08: 28
        Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
        So, in your opinion, the president is obliged to deal with everything personally?

        And what should he do in your opinion? Sit in the Kremlin (residence) and listen to officials? And shouldn't he be the one making decisions on appointments to positions?
        Yes, but as a result of the terrorist attacks on June 1st, there should be personnel changes... And what does he expect from officials who have been feigning vigorous activity for decades?
        The phrase: I led you, I will answer for everything... doesn’t work.
        We need to work out radical solutions, but he decided to take up the Russian language. Soon there will be no Russian speakers left in the country!
        1. -8
          6 June 2025 17: 09
          What do you think he should do?
          Actually, the president, how executive power, must obey the legislative power. To carry out what the gentlemen deputies have thought up. That is why the executive power is there, to carry out the wishes of the legislative power.
          Sit in the Kremlin (residence) and listen to officials? But shouldn't he be the one making decisions on appointments to positions?
          So that's what he does, isn't it? He listens and appoints. What's wrong?
          Yes, but as a result of the terrorist attacks on June 1, personnel changes should follow...
          Okay. Who should have been removed, specifically. Positions, names, for what offenses. Put them on the shelves. Otherwise, it turns out that you decided so because you want to. Remove!1 Everyone!1 It doesn't matter whether they are guilty or not, remove them!11.
          It is necessary to develop radical solutions, but he decided to study the Russian language.
          Actually, the holiday was officially introduced back in 2010. Are you against the fact that Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin is an outstanding Russian poet? Are you against the fact that we celebrate, as I understand, unlike you, the holiday of the Russian language? Well, that's your personal business, if surzhyk is more important to you, we have nothing to do with it. But it's also not your business to express dissatisfaction with our holidays. What a Pole I am, who doesn't like that we respect Susanin for his feat! Come on, paddle your flippers to your still-your-Lvov, and whine to the curators!
          1. +2
            7 June 2025 00: 00
            Grandpa-dilettante, in fact, the executive power is the Council of Ministers (with its ministries), headed by the Prime Minister. And the President is simply responsible for everything, as the guarantor of the Constitution.
        2. +2
          7 June 2025 10: 51
          Quote: ROSS 42
          Yes, only based on the results of the terrorist attacks on June 1st.

          And what about the results of the pogrom of the Black Sea Fleet? And what about the results of the Kharkov counter-retreat? And what about the results of the surrender of Kherson? And what about the results of the defense industry's activities? And so on for a long time.
      6. +18
        6 June 2025 08: 31
        Well, look - Peskov said that the PVV received information in real time about the sabotage, probably saw footage of the enemy carrying out strikes, and therefore saw "protective covers". Apparently, he had no questions about why the planes were protected not by hangars, but by covers. Both the Minister of Defense and the Commander-in-Chief are appointed personally by the President, and as far as I recall, they are responsible for equipping and staffing the Armed Forces (well, not the Ministry of Finance). It turns out that these officials were unable to organize the work at the proper level, and he did not ask for this failure, everyone was happy with everything.
        Regarding the action itself - now many are writing about the incredible level of the operation, that the SBU themselves (or whoever was organized on the Ukrainian side) could not have carried it out, aliens from Alpha Centauri were almost in charge there. But in fact, the only difficulty of the entire operation was the type of explosives. If it was not homemade explosives, then we can still argue that there were difficulties. If the explosives were homemade, then anyone with sufficient knowledge and cash could pull it off. Accordingly, the main question is again mainly to the military - why didn't they organize the service properly... The fault of counterintelligence and other special services is much less, because it is almost impossible to expose an individual or a completely autonomous group using publicly available components for an attack...
        1. -19
          6 June 2025 12: 26
          questions why planes are protected not by hangars but by tires

          You can't be that stupid.
          It has been said more than once, including at the Military Aviation Conference, that strategic aviation aircraft MUST be parked OPENLY, in accordance with international treaties.

          But no, the handbrake is pressed all the way down...
          1. +12
            6 June 2025 12: 38
            I don’t know, so tell me how you can be so stupid that you can’t read in our time.
            The treaty does not prohibit building hangars and placing aircraft in them! Stop echoing the idiots!
            Here you have the B-2, B-52, Tu-95 and Tu-160 sending you fiery greetings from the hangars! B-52 even with the nomenclature of weapons!
            And secondly, this agreement is no longer valid, it was suspended by the PVV!
            1. -11
              6 June 2025 12: 41
              Is this really a "hangar"? Or a maintenance box?
              1. +5
                6 June 2025 12: 55
                In general, yes, a hangar because "A hangar (French hangar) is a structure for storing, maintaining and repairing airplanes, airships (slipways), helicopters, other aircraft, or other large-sized equipment", but in general - is there a difference for a satellite? I'm going to turn off my brain now and start asking stupid questions like yours:
                You say - planes MUST be parked OPENLY. Are the planes in the photo parked? Yes, they are. Openly? No. They are violating their direct responsibilities, is that it?…
        2. -5
          6 June 2025 17: 44
          Well, look - Peskov said that the PVV received information in real time about the sabotage, probably saw footage of the enemy carrying out strikes, and therefore saw "protective tires". Apparently, he had no questions about why the planes were protected not by hangars, but by tires.
          Let's do it this way. You communicate normally, present arguments, and I am also ready to respond normally. And then some here reproach that today the president paid attention to the Russian language holiday. Well, naturally, it seems that this should not have happened... Wildness... Sorry, I got distracted.
          The planes are parked in the open. Good. Alternatively, this is a consequence of the treaty with the US. Nuclear weapons carriers must be open for inspection. You can go deeper: the Tu-95s are, unfortunately, obsolete. They are about 75 years old. Despite modernization, they cannot carry nuclear weapons in the event of a global conflict. There is no point. They will be shot down before they reach the striking distance. I am very sad about this, the plane is really beautiful, and... And that's it. They are obsolete. No, they can still be useful in the North-Eastern Military District. And they are. But they simply cannot reach American territory. Or England. Subsonic, huge, powerful... In the 50-60s they were powerful. Now - alas. And the tires have nothing to do with it.
          Tu-22. Younger, but the same story. Higher speed, smaller radius, they won't be able to cover the distance to a guaranteed strike on the US. They have aircraft carriers, and on them - a serious number of aircraft. Modern ones.
          It turns out that these officials were unable to organize the work at the proper level, and he did not ask for this failure, everyone was satisfied with everything.
          Why ask? Yes, sabotage happened. Yes, it was carried out with a rating of 4. One truck exploded, so the sabotage was not ideal. And the guys with stones, hitting the drones... But! Let's see. Was at least one Tu-160 damaged? No. And this is, perhaps, our only carrier that has at least some chance of breaking through to America. The outdated machines were damaged.
          But in fact, the only difficulty of the whole operation is the type of explosive. If it was not a makeshift explosive, then we can still argue that there were difficulties. If the explosives are makeshift, then anyone with sufficient knowledge and cash can pull it off.
          As far as I remember, if I'm not confusing it with blowing up a railway, of course, then this is standard explosives used by NATO and the US. I'm not sure that the Ukrainian Armed Forces use anything original in principle.
          Accordingly, the main question is again mainly for the military - why didn't they organize the service properly... Counterintelligence and other special services are much less to blame, because it is practically impossible to expose an individual or a completely autonomous group using publicly available components to strike...
          I agree about the military. Protecting the base airfield is the responsibility of the airfield personnel, and, of course, the regiment commander. But there are nuances... Why do we need air defense in the Irkutsk region? All air defense/missile defense is concentrated in the western direction. Well, and on protecting the capital. This is wrong, but it is what it is. The drones could only fly to Irkutsk like this, from the ground, from a short distance. They were simply not expected there. And no measures were taken. I am sure that organizational conclusions will follow. Maybe not publicly...
          Counterintelligence and other special services are much less to blame
          No less. Yes, it is difficult to uncover an autonomous group. But the FSB must also guard strategically important objects, regardless of the regular security. These are strategic aviation airfields. Nuclear weapons carriers. In the USSR, such objects were guarded by the KGB. Even if they were guarded by the personnel of the units. So the FSB bears responsibility to the same extent. hi
          1. 0
            7 June 2025 11: 49
            Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
            And then some people here are reproaching the president for paying attention to the Russian language holiday today.

            Man! Turn on your brain!!!
            The reproach is that first we need to solve the problems and correct the situation in the fight against terrorism, and then deal with the holidays!!!
            You've climbed onto a site with the concepts of a yard gossip and are trying to teach those who appeal to facts and provide arguments. No one hired you to look for the necessary information!!! Go study your lessons if your understanding is frozen.
            1. -1
              7 June 2025 13: 22
              Man! Turn on your brain!!!

              Only after you, Yuri. I finished learning lessons 50 years ago, even more.
              The reproach is that first we need to solve the problems and correct the situation in the fight against terrorism, and then deal with the holidays!!!
              Please address this publicly to the person who deals with the holidays, and not whisper it in a back alley so that the addressee of these words, God forbid, hears it. Do I approve the holidays? Do I congratulate Mr. Pashinyan? No? Then - go to the Kremlin. But you won't go, you don't have the guts.
              I may have butted in with the janitor's notions, I won't argue. But these are my notions and my convictions. But you, Yuri, are ready to rebel, to express discontent, but in such a way as not to get into trouble. This is the position of a coward. A coward against a janitor - not bad.
              If you have something to object to, for God's sake. But - voice your complaints in the Kremlin, not here.
              You have climbed onto a site with the concepts of a street gossip and are trying to teach those who appeal to facts and give arguments. No one was hired to look for the necessary information for you!!!
              I didn't see any facts from you. A fact is a proven value. And the evidence must be irrefutable. Not links to Telegram, TikTok, and other sources. Official statements by the Russian Ministry of Defense are sufficient evidence. The official statement by the President of Russia is also sufficient evidence. SsyNN, bloggers, Radio Liberty are sources that are not trustworthy without official confirmation. If you have official evidence, contact us. If not, go through the forest to an abandoned farmstead, and don't forget your net, there are plenty of butterflies there.
        3. +1
          7 June 2025 00: 04
          I can tell you who was involved - Israeli Mossad, MI6, CIA. Listen to Scott Ritter.
      7. +12
        6 June 2025 08: 44
        The President appoints the person responsible.
        The man failed his job, what happens, they just transfer him to another position. The main thing when you steal is to be able to share
        1. -6
          6 June 2025 17: 50
          The man failed his job, what happens, they just transfer him to another position. The main thing when you steal is to be able to share
          No problem, I respect any opinion if it is supported by facts. Give examples. Specifics, who, to whom, how much, accounts, from which and to which. At the same time, send this information to the prosecutor's office. They will check. If solitaire comes up - they will put the corrupt officials in jail. If not - they will put you in jail. For slander.
          Or are you just saying that for the sake of chatting? Sorry, but you can't lie about things like that. Either facts, or - don't lie.
          1. +1
            7 June 2025 11: 55
            Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
            If the solitaire game works out, the corrupt officials will be put in jail.

            What are you saying? And what are the results of the inspection of the construction of the Olympic facilities? On what basis and for what merits did Rotenberg receive the title Hero of Russia? Did he admit that he is the owner of the palace near Gelendzhik?
            What did Manturov say to justify his annual income of over 700 rubles? How did Chubais escape punishment? Who was responsible for the disruption of mobilization during the SVO?
            1. -1
              7 June 2025 13: 30
              What are you saying? And what are the results of the inspection of the construction of the Olympic facilities? On what basis and for what merits did Rotenberg receive the title Hero of Russia? Did he admit that he is the owner of the palace near Gelendzhik?
              What did Manturov say to justify his annual income of over 700 rubles? How did Chubais escape punishment? Who was responsible for the disruption of mobilization during the SVO?
              Once again. You ask questions to the janitor, as you say. Don't you think that these questions should be asked to those who did this? Or are you ready to talk to a refrigerator, a pole, a stool, just so they can answer you?!
              Since you are not able to soberly evaluate your actions, I wash my hands of it. I am not a psychiatrist. I have the honor, unlike you.
      8. +10
        6 June 2025 11: 23
        According to your logic, if the company is unprofitable, then the director has nothing to do with it?
        1. -13
          6 June 2025 15: 00
          According to your logic, if the company is unprofitable, then the director has nothing to do with it?

          I don't see any loss for Russia. Several planes were damaged. Loss? Yes. Serious? No.
          Strategic bombers produced in the middle of the last century have no chance in the event of a global conflict. The Tu-95, unfortunately, is already slightly outdated. The Tu-22 is also not the first freshness, despite modernization.
    2. +21
      6 June 2025 05: 49
      The whole world saw the true value of the Russian president's promises...

      But we in the country understood this when our retirement age was extended, it immediately became clear that the president’s words were empty words.
      1. -11
        6 June 2025 12: 28
        The retirement age was raised not by the President, but by the State Duma.
        It's time to learn to somehow distinguish between the branches of government... they used to teach this in schools.

        And the President, according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, is OBLIGED to sign a bill that has been reviewed twice by the Duma. In short, hello to Yeltsin...
        1. +9
          6 June 2025 13: 15
          What is it with you, everyone is obligated to everyone, but you haven't read anything... the president has the right of veto! We have a presidential republic, not a parliamentary one.
          Here you have for the first Yandex request: “The President of Russia considers federal laws within 14 days after their receipt from the Federation Council or the State Duma. If the President of the Russian Federation vetoes a bill, the upper and lower houses of Parliament are immediately notified of this. If they are ready to revise the bill, a special commission is created from State Duma deputies and representatives of the President of Russia. Senators of the Russian Federation can also be members of the special commission, but this is not regulated by the Constitution of the Russian Federation or any legislative acts, but is at the discretion of the President and (or) the State Duma of the Russian Federation [1]. Members of the commission must either re-examine the bill taking into account the objections of the head of state, or remove it from consideration permanently (Chapter 15 of the State Duma Rules). Also, the State Duma and the Federation Council of the Russian Federation can override the President’s veto if both houses vote by a constitutional (qualified) majority. To override a veto, two-thirds of the votes of each chamber (at least 300 deputies and 120 senators) are required.”
          I'll tell you more, even if in a parallel universe our Duma decides to impeach the president, he can sleep peacefully for a long time, and then at the last moment get up and dissolve the Duma!
          1. +2
            7 June 2025 11: 59
            Quote: parma
            and then at the last moment get up and dissolve the Duma!

            Or just shoot the Supreme Council with tanks... feel
    3. -19
      6 June 2025 08: 13
      Quote: ROSS 42
      The whole world saw the true value of the Russian president's promises, and I felt ashamed that the country was being led by such people...

      If you are ashamed of Putin, then are you proud of Zelensky and his whole gang (read my post above)? Are you an accomplice of terrorists?

      Apart from the sixth management priority (which you and many on the forum are above) you are not aware of.
      1. +3
        7 June 2025 12: 04
        Quote: Boris55
        If you are ashamed of Putin, then are you proud of Zelensky and his whole gang (read my post above)? Are you an accomplice of terrorists?

        If you draw conclusions based on the principle: either black or white and continue (for what purpose) to write slogans and quotes in red font, then you are... colorblind...
        Be careful when crossing intersections...
    4. 0
      6 June 2025 10: 48
      Vous avez la chance d'avoir un grand Président.....En occident, nous n'avons que des minables corrompus depuis 50 ans. (Message de France).
    5. +11
      6 June 2025 12: 12
      Quote: ROSS 42
      The whole world saw
      So, Western media were bowing and scraping before the SVO that Ukraine would collapse in three days... They deceived, the bastards, decent people in the Kremlin. As Boris Leontyevich, our main "Putinologist" and "Putinophile", wrote above, - "Yesterday, in connection with the latest terrorist attacks, Putin effectively reclassified the SVO as a counter-terrorist operation, the Ukrainian leadership was recognized as terrorists, and everyone who helps them is an assistant to terrorists. This was announced after Trump's phone call. Apparently, Trump agrees with our president's conclusions.".
      As if Uncle Trump had allowed it. I wonder which of the Banderites would be the first to be wiped out in the toilet? And it's hard to imagine how Joseph Vissarionovich would have declared "SVO" or "KTO" against Hitler, or would have arranged a shootout with him somewhere in Tehran.
      1. +5
        6 June 2025 12: 13
        Quote: Per se.
        And it is still difficult to imagine how Joseph Vissarionovich would have declared a "SVO" against Hitler, or would have arranged a shootout with him somewhere in Tehran.

        good I share it entirely!!!
      2. +2
        7 June 2025 00: 16
        So we don't understand something. That the president doesn't legally call the SVO a war. Although he did call it that in conversation. And the fact that Trump agreed to the terrorist state of the Outskirts is because the US still has a lot of authority and they still rule the world. It would have been worse if Trump hadn't agreed to it. Or is it that someone doesn't understand? Trump has his own reasons for this.
  3. +18
    6 June 2025 04: 08
    Just a few years ago, even on this forum, civilians repeatedly suggested various options for combating drones, methods of detection and protection of objects, in terms of complexity and cost. At the very beginning of the SVO, I wrote about hunting rifles and fishing nets. Idiots laughed at me... Now they are used everywhere. I also wrote about protecting aircraft with nets, because building hangars takes a long time and is expensive, but you can surround an aircraft (or a tank at an oil storage facility, or each bridge support...) with a net along the perimeter in an hour. The Crimean bridge was still being built, and I wrote about the need to surround each support with a net... There were other suggestions, but as it turned out, even basic actions by responsible officials to provide for measures to protect and defend important objects were not there, and still are not there. With such inaction, delaying the SVO will only increase the scale of losses.
    1. +6
      6 June 2025 04: 16
      Quote: Edvid
      hunting rifles and fishing nets

      But no one thought of the tires on the flat surfaces...
      1. +10
        6 June 2025 05: 29
        Quote from Uncle Lee
        But no one thought of the tires on the flat surfaces...

        I wonder if these tires were bought or searched for in dumps? I suspect that some budget was allocated for this...
      2. +14
        6 June 2025 06: 26
        . but about the tires on the planes - no one guessed....



        ..... But tires filled with relics, crosses and icons are obviously today the basic element of the defense structure of strategic facilities )).....
        1. +1
          6 June 2025 14: 36
          ..... But tires filled with relics, crosses and icons are obviously today the basic element of the defense structure of strategic facilities
          The planes also needed to be sprinkled with holy water wink
          1. 0
            7 June 2025 15: 38
            I have a suspicion that it has already been sprinkled. Does the contract include returns under the warranty period?
      3. 0
        6 June 2025 11: 01
        Apparently, it was assumed that when flying up to an object and discovering tires on it, the enemy drone (operator) would be disoriented in making further decisions - because all resources would be spent on understanding and comprehending what was seen. As a result, the device "froze", the operator is in ah... (discouraged).
    2. +12
      6 June 2025 05: 35
      Nothing is as cheap and nothing is as expensive as amateurism!
    3. +3
      6 June 2025 08: 14
      The network is, of course, also a half-measure; during a massive attack, the first drones are blown up, while the rest move on, but at least this way, for a start...
    4. +6
      6 June 2025 08: 49
      You see, the problem back then wasn't with FPV drones, but with full-size ones based on an airplane or built from scratch. Something tells me that for a "maize" drone stuffed with explosives, a fishing net and a double-barreled shotgun are like an elephant's pellet...
      1. 0
        6 June 2025 09: 09
        Something tells me that for a "maize duster" packed with explosives a fishing net and a double-barreled shotgun are like elephant pellets...

        Do you think that flying over Russia in the "spirit of Rust" is possible today?
        if it will be so...
        then how to look people in the eyes?
        1. +5
          6 June 2025 09: 34
          And you are only worried about the possibility of a miss, the authorities no longer have anything to bashfully hide their eyes about?... although in fact they did not plan to be ashamed of anything, 10 years ago DAM said everything "there is no money, but you hang in there. Have a good day and good mood"
        2. +3
          6 June 2025 12: 31
          flying over Russia in the "spirit of Rust" is still possible today
          Watch the video of the attack on oil refineries in Kazan and Ufa.
        3. 0
          6 June 2025 17: 59
          Do you think that flying over Russia in the "spirit of Rust" is possible today?

          I think so. But not quite in the spirit of Rust... The overwhelming majority of air defense is concentrated to protect the western borders. On a conventional "Kukuruznik" you can try to enter our territory from the east or from the south. I emphasize: there are air defenses there too, but there are fewer of them than in the SVO zone. This is common logic.
          1. An airplane made of plywood and canvas will be very difficult to detect on radar.
          2. The threat to us is now concentrated in the West.
          Based on this, I consider it entirely possible for an airplane to fly into the country.
  4. +6
    6 June 2025 04: 25
    It's not the sabotage that was done perfectly, it's everything else that we did poorly. Well, first of all, there are huge black holes in the legislation, you can do whatever you want for money, there is no clear control, so you can carry out terrorist attacks if you want. The military airfield turned out to be completely unprepared, and in principle, everyone turned out to be unprepared...
    1. +6
      6 June 2025 04: 45
      Quote from turembo
      It's not the sabotage that was done perfectly, it's us that did everything else badly. Well, first of all, there are huge black holes in the legislation, you can do whatever you want for money, there is no clear control, so you can carry out terrorist attacks if you want.

      Because for you and me the SVO is a war, but for the overwhelming majority of the country's leadership it is not a war, but rather an obstacle to business in the West, or even a source of business. Accordingly, they do not want either a win or a speedy victorious conclusion.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. -3
      6 June 2025 05: 46
      Quote from turembo
      For money you can do whatever you want,

      So who are the complaints against? Start with yourself, if you are ready to give money, then why are you offended that the other side takes it? I decided to add, otherwise they will misunderstand. I am just a pensioner, they do not bring me money, but I do not bring it to anyone! Something like that.
      1. +4
        6 June 2025 06: 17
        Excuse me, but what complaints? I simply pointed out that we were not ready for this, if you think we were, I will not argue anyway. And I do not wave money around, just like in front of me, but for me it is not normal that in the country you can buy everything for a terrorist attack, arrange this very terrorist attack, and in the end there is no one to ask, although people died (a bridge), equipment...
    3. 0
      6 June 2025 12: 51
      Well, first of all, there are huge black holes in the legislation; you can do whatever you want for money,
      If you can do whatever you want for money, then holes in the law don’t matter at all.
    4. +1
      6 June 2025 17: 56
      Well, basically, everyone turned out to be unprepared...
      but I'm sure everyone is ready to receive their salary this week, all the responsible people are masters of this! feel
    5. +1
      7 June 2025 12: 14
      Quote from turembo
      The military airfield turned out to be unprepared, and in principle, everyone turned out to be unprepared...

      And what should we have prepared for? There are officials, civil servants and ministers who have oppressed the Russian people for a quarter of a century, bringing them to the brink of extinction, and were ready to continue further, stop But in peacetime, with foreign trips, real estate, children and wives with dual citizenship, bank accounts abroad... And then trouble came from where it was least expected - the Ukrainian Nazis attacked Russia... It was from them that shells were flying across Russian territory, when Russia was still thinking: to start or to deepen...
      And no one knew that the production of UAVs is more important than tank biathlons, and the construction of shelters for strategic aviation is more important than the construction of the Temple of the RF Armed Forces...
  5. +3
    6 June 2025 05: 32
    Resources should be directed primarily to neutralizing such threats within the country.

    Another "Need". Who needs it? The special services "Need" that the budget be increased tenfold for this, without any subsequent report.
  6. +7
    6 June 2025 05: 45
    Basayev and his gang left Chechnya in several KAMAZ trucks and drove unhindered through several military and traffic police posts all the way to Budyonnovsk. In exactly the same way, taking advantage of the traffic police's venality and laxity, they transported the drone cargo
  7. BAI
    +4
    6 June 2025 06: 15
    may not stop even after the end of, so to speak, the "hot" phase of the SVO. Ukraine may maintain and even increase its subversive activity of this kind, transferring it to the category of permanent,

    That is why the liquidation of Ukraine is necessary.
    1. -7
      6 June 2025 07: 23
      Are you ready to go and fulfill this need?
      1. BAI
        +4
        6 June 2025 08: 39

        Ermak
        _415


        Especially for the head of Zelensky's office - yes
  8. +10
    6 June 2025 06: 27
    President Putin said, and very decisively, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields. Donald Trump
    Did he ask for permission? "I'll have to", meaning I don't want to, but I have to? Shit, what a disgrace...
  9. +8
    6 June 2025 06: 41
    Well, if the organizers of these raids probably didn't know in detail the regime and air defense means of these particular airfields with Russian strategic military aviation, then probably the SBU wouldn't have taken on such a multi-step operation. You and I don't know how the strategic aviation airfields deep in Russia are guarded and by what short-range air defense means, we don't need to know this, and those who needed to know, I suppose, found out about this without difficulty. Was there any sloppiness and chaos on the part of the Ministry of Defense in guarding the most important strategic facilities deep in Russia - that's a Hamlet question...
    Well, what if we assume that the special services also failed to notice among our own citizens, even among the Russians inside Russia, those who want to serve the Banderites???... In the SBU itself, half have Russian surnames, starting from Budanov and ending with Danilov, and how many in the aviation do they have with Russian surnames, and how many pure-blooded Russians command companies and battalions of the Banderite army???...
    The idea of ​​such a strike is very old. Starting from the Trojan horse and ending with the Russian container missile system Club-K, which any potential "partner" could have purchased at military exhibitions organized by Russia ten years ago, since it is an imported version of the Russian container complex for standard sea containers "Caliber-K". Well, the enemy borrowed the idea with drones from this complex, instead of missiles ... for now.
    What's next? I don't know, because the thunder has been rumbling for a long time, but our man-guarantor still doesn't cross himself, and the roasted rooster still pecks him in the sirloin, but the man-guarantor still takes a long time to harness and also doesn't drive quickly for a long time...
    1. +2
      6 June 2025 09: 15
      You and I don’t know how strategic aviation airfields deep in Russia are guarded.

      I remember the Soviet era, when cars (mostly passenger cars) were repeatedly detained in the area where the TU-22M3 was based, the traffic police detained them, and then everyone got involved...
  10. +4
    6 June 2025 07: 11
    The author gives advice to the FSB: to carry out preventive measures, and, they say, not after the fact.
    The FSB does this preventively; that’s their philosophy, if you like.

    But the FSB now has the same problem as business and the army: there are no people.
    I am sure that since the beginning of the SVO, some FSB officers have been sent to new regions,
    and to cities with a population of over a million. Their workload is now enormous.
    Accordingly, there are now even fewer of them in Murmansk and Irkutsk.

    If business and the army can somehow, for better or worse, "put a 60-year-old pensioner into service",
    then in the FSB - it is already impossible to take a person from the street.

    So, objectively, the problem is not the FSB, but the entire organization of the country's security, which, alas, the incompetent leaders did not calculate before the SVO...

    Damn...at least on the Lomonosov supercomputer at Moscow State University, since they don't have enough brains.
    Bitter...sad.
    1. +8
      6 June 2025 09: 37
      It's not a lack of personnel.
      People go to the FSB to do business with their ID cards. Not to protect something.

      Remember the Helik parade.
  11. +6
    6 June 2025 07: 43
    What to expect and what to be surprised by from the "operation" 4th year? The operation is really necessary, but it should lead to a specific result in a matter of weeks, followed by a long regime of renaturation, quarantine, isolation, correctional and restorative work.
    The protracted nature of the treatment contributes to and provokes the build-up of enemy forces. Where is the first step – denazification – the destruction of the source of the disease and its replacement with a healthy one? It has not even begun… The doctor stops the pathogen at the beginning of the treatment, why is this not the case? The patient must be adequately treated, not beaten.
  12. 0
    6 June 2025 07: 54
    Our special services need to change their focus and seriously engage in the systematic strengthening of internal counterintelligence and logistical control.

    Are you making fun of common sense or something? request
    This will do nothing to stop the terrorist attacks.
    Only the destruction of the top and middle management of the GRU, SBU, Armed Forces of Ukraine, and the political leadership will give real results.
    The Ukrainian Nazis opened Pandora's Box with this terrorist attack...now the Houthis, Iranians, Palestinians and any other peoples will adopt such methods...cheap, cool, angry...maximum damage
    the enemy will be inflicted with cheap gadgets...such is the reality of today.
    The Kremlin towers have not emerged from the nirvana of the last century and think that they will get off easy...this is not true.
    1. -7
      6 June 2025 08: 35
      The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      With this terrorist attack, the Ukrainian Nazis opened Pandora's Box.

      The exchange of terrorists for captured civilians in Kursk only encourages terrorists to continue terrorist attacks. If the FSB catches terrorists, they will be exchanged.... Medinsky and his entire negotiating team, when the issue of exchanging PRISONERS OF WAR was discussed, understood perfectly well that by his actions he equated our civilians with prisoners of war and thereby removed responsibility from terrorists for the murder of our civilians - now they are not civilians, all Russians are military and therefore they (women, children, old people) can be killed.
      1. -1
        6 June 2025 08: 53
        There is currently a discussion on YouTube about a strange event over Astana, Kazakhstan... winked
  13. 0
    6 June 2025 09: 59
    The way they pushed it through - let the special services study it and think about what to counter it with.

    But the fact that there was no shelter for aircraft or jammers, apparently, is a specific flight of all sorts of generals and ministers (and even the government), which is just wow.
    .
    They should think about it...
    After all, what is characteristic is that that aviation also increased the likelihood that the US not will decide to "stuff us all with nuclear dicks." That is, "those who should think about it" too.
  14. +4
    6 June 2025 10: 48
    Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
    Should...Necessary...Required...
    The whole world saw the true value of the Russian president's promises, and I felt ashamed that the country was being led by such people.
    So, in your opinion, the president is obliged to deal with everything personally? Who told you that the president, and not the Aerospace Forces command, should deal with the same hangars for aircraft? Maybe Putin should also personally go mix concrete?! Or personally inspect every truck leaving for a flight?

    Yes, he must. The President himself (or was prompted) built such a "vertical of power" in which anything happens only with manual control, because delegating is oh so scary. He made a decision and appointed. If the appointees can't cope, then take it yourself and do it. Apparently, he has no idea about horizontal scaling.
  15. -2
    6 June 2025 10: 51
    even receiving direct advisory assistance from foreign allies

    but this is not "even", but more than likely... the CIA and MI6 have rich and long-term experience of such activities, especially in the Middle East, and they were given the go-ahead to share... the British have been present in Ukraine for a long time and even tease the Americans, claiming "first fiddle", the information that the Americans were informed also did not appear out of nowhere... naturally, it was officially refuted... it was correctly noted that the "usual" clumsiness was replaced by good thought-outness, which speaks about this
  16. +4
    6 June 2025 10: 51
    Quote from: FoBoss_VM
    The Foreign Ministry said that the planes will be restored
    Will the MFA restore the planes? Or the Ministry of Culture? wink
    1. 0
      7 June 2025 15: 41
      a joke about the Ministry of Culture came to mind: laundry? .....
      here they will be
    2. 0
      8 June 2025 00: 17
      Will the Ministry of Foreign Affairs restore the planes?
      Are the employees of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs responsible for the safety of strategic aviation at their bases? Who is responsible for the protection of aircraft? Why is there still not a single article or commentary on this? Everyone blames the top management, the special services, and in your case the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but who, according to job descriptions, is entrusted with the protection of these facilities? Who are these people?
  17. +2
    6 June 2025 12: 48
    This did not happen on June 1, but when they began to reform, optimize, condemn, fire and retire those for whom Officer's Honor was not an empty phrase.
    1. 0
      8 June 2025 00: 13
      Drones should be shot down and suppressed by electronic warfare and air defense systems, not by officer honor.
  18. fiv
    +1
    6 June 2025 14: 52
    Vladimir Vladimirovich! Kazakhstan is rapidly leaving our zone of influence! Considering the length of the borders, the "reliability" of the customs service, the absence of Border Troops, we will have problems with terrorist activities from the territory of Kazakhstan!
  19. +2
    6 June 2025 15: 06
    There was a magazine called "Technology for Youth", where you can find instructions on assembling gliders. Now there is the Internet and you can find instructions on assembling drones and so on. You can buy any components for drones on any marketplace. As well as components for making a combustible mixture or SVU. This is no secret to anyone.
    But I want to stand up for our special services, in particular the FSB and customs, since they are mentioned in the article. I work in logistics and I know how much cargo they check and confiscate, and it's not just counterfeit goods. SIM cards, components for gliders and drones, even drugs are found in large quantities. The men work a lot and to the point of exhaustion, honestly. I see them almost constantly.
    1. 0
      6 June 2025 18: 13
      SIM cards, components for gliders and drones, even drugs are found in large quantities
      and how far is the work going - who sent the drones to whom? Or is this another department that is already not doing its job?
      1. +2
        7 June 2025 09: 25
        It's hard to find the sender, there are schemes like in spy series. It would take a long time to describe, but if you want I can tell you how they send incognito.
        But the recipients are accepted, when delivered by courier or at the pick-up point. Personally, in my presence, four times.
        1. -1
          7 June 2025 12: 31
          It's hard to find the sender; the schemes are like those in spy series.
          Well, we have KGB specialists at our head, they probably prepared a shift to look for the sender winked
          But the recipients are accepted
          well, at least so ...
          1. +1
            7 June 2025 12: 43
            They probably prepared a shift to look for the sender

            I will explain one of the methods in the SDEK company. On the website, you create a personal account (hereinafter LA) using fake or purchased online (and there are plenty of them, unfortunately) passport data. In the LA, you create an order, where you indicate fake data in the sender and recipient. You come to the pick-up point with an already created order. I chose the cheapest tariff so that it would go by truck, less inspection, restrictions, etc. The employee is obliged to inspect the contents upon acceptance, but what will he see? Consumer goods, trimmer/washing machine components, etc. And in most cases, at small pick-up points, he will not even look. THAT'S IT! The parcel is on its way. One box out of tens of thousands daily. The security officers simply won't have enough employees to check all this. That's how they sent explosives in gas stoves and from Ukrainians propaganda materials for our military personnel.
            well, at least so ...

            But I can also say that most of them are taken into operational service. This is much better.
            1. -1
              7 June 2025 12: 52
              You come to the pick-up point with an order already created.
              Usually there are cameras at the points and here the documents won't help much. Combat programmers can also find out where the order was registered from. Plus fingerprints and DNA on the cargo. And then unravel the sender and open the entire chain. And I think there aren't thousands of them, otherwise with such a number of saboteurs it would be necessary to introduce martial law
              1. +2
                7 June 2025 13: 17
                Not usually, but always. BUT!
                1) We don't have mandatory fingerprinting and DNA submission to the Ministry of Internal Affairs bank. It seems that only the US has it. And that's only for visitors. This is a HUGE minus, but it's true. The crime detection rate on the spot (and this is by PPS officers) could be increased to 90%. And there would be no wood grouse.
                2) The box won't be wiped, of course, but the contents will. And it will pass through dozens of hands. You'll have to install them all. It's such a pain in the ass...
                3) In order to untangle, you need to take this box out of the entire volume.
                Just imagine, they open the gates of a truck for you, where there are approximately 3 tons of boxes. How long will it take you to open them all, draw up a report (and there is no other way, bureaucracy motherfucker), check the contents and close it again! And do the same. And dozens of such trucks leave one logistics center. There won't be enough employees, I repeat.
                It has gotten to the point where drugs are sold through a well-known marketplace.
                This is a colossal amount of work. At this stage, our guys cannot physically check everything.
  20. -1
    6 June 2025 16: 30
    Several bombers carrying nuclear weapons were damaged or destroyed.
    Well, then strike back with the weapons they were intended to deliver.
  21. 0
    6 June 2025 17: 13
    Now many media resources write that the planes were parked in open parking lots because the Americans had to control or the atomic bombs were not loaded, but how can we understand this????
  22. +1
    6 June 2025 21: 44
    When I wrote about the need for transformers at the Ukrainian power plant in 2022, I wrote that if you do not commit sabotage, then they will commit it against you. We waited.
    .
    I don't understand at all why our commanders divided actions against the enemy's infrastructure and military facilities into clean and unclean? Especially considering that the enemy does not adhere to this gradation...
    You need to hammer everything you can reach, and not whine about the enemy’s immorality.
    1. -1
      7 June 2025 10: 05
      This drone attack has made it clear that the strategic aviation aircraft,
      1 it is large and has a well-recognizable appearance, it is impossible to hide it from the satellite
      2 again, due to its large size, it is impossible to make a reliable concrete shelter for it
      3 all actions with the aircraft at the airfield, refueling, preparation for departure and the departure itself are tracked minute by minute from space
      4 To launch a cruise missile, a strategist needs to take off
      5 there is non-flying weather
      And with all this, to launch a cruise missile from an aircraft, you must at least have
      -the rocket itself
      - bring the missile to the airfield and store it there
      -we need an airfield
      -need a plane
      -crews needed
      Now let's think about whether a cruise missile needs an airplane if, unlike a free-falling bomb, it can also fly, maybe it would be easier to launch it from ground-based launchers, for example from a van, a truck or a railway platform
      1. 0
        7 June 2025 11: 10
        Quote: agond
        2 again, due to its large size, it is impossible to make a reliable concrete shelter for it

        With horseradish?

        Quote: agond
        Now let's think about whether a cruise missile needs an airplane if, unlike a free-falling bomb, it can also fly, maybe it would be easier to launch it from ground-based launchers, for example from a van, a truck or a railway platform

        An aircraft with its speed, ability to quickly change launch points and range of action is better in this regard than ground-based systems.

        Quote: agond
        1 it is large and has a well-recognizable appearance, it is impossible to hide it from the satellite

        Depends on the satellite. Clouds haven't been cancelled yet.
      2. 0
        7 June 2025 13: 01
        2 again, due to its large size, it is impossible to make a reliable concrete shelter for it
        and for smaller planes, reliable concrete shelters were not built because Timur Ivanov was in charge of military construction at the time, that is, there were those contracts where you could simply steal money, build nothing, and you wouldn’t get into trouble for it
  23. 0
    7 June 2025 14: 09
    Neither the Russian Armed Forces, nor the country's leadership, nor the intelligence services were prepared for the SVO - that's why the results are so sad. They say that a fish (big or small) starts to rot from the head - so we draw our own conclusions...
    1. 0
      8 June 2025 00: 11
      In general, these are the fins that have rotted, who have not come up with anything better to deal with a possible drone attack than to throw tires on the wings. Just don't say that after the start of the SVO there were no attacks on strategists. On the ground, no one cares about the arrivals in Engels.
  24. 0
    7 June 2025 18: 56
    Quote from alexoff
    An aircraft with its speed, ability to quickly change launch points and range of action is better in this regard than ground-based systems.

    If a rocket is launched, say, from a van or car whose location is unknown, since it is impossible to track this location in principle, then there is no need to change the launch point.
  25. 0
    8 June 2025 00: 06
    This is why our special services need to change their focus and seriously engage in systemic strengthening of internal counterintelligence and logistics control. Issues of inspection, registration, movement of cargo, sources of financing and communications of potential saboteurs should be dealt with not after the fact, but preventively. Resources should be directed primarily to neutralizing such threats within the country, because the belief that defense and strategic facilities will be afraid of massive attacks was not very strong before, and after June 1, 2025, it disappeared altogether.

    Maybe our special services should also become traffic controllers?
    Why is it that everyone who is not too lazy throws mud and tells the special services what and how to do, what they should do, but no one cares about the sloppiness and indifference on the ground? Should the special services be responsible for protecting the strategic facilities of the Ministry of Defense? They cannot cope with their own forces and capabilities, so we need special services?