Russia's response options to the destruction of part of the nuclear shield
It needs to be "jammed"
The first thought after realizing what happened on June 1, 2025, was complete solidarity with the colorful commentator of the video filmed in the Irkutsk region. At the sight of quadcopters flying out of the trailer, he called for "jamming" those involved in this sabotage in Ukraine. The SBU's tentacles have never reached so far into Russia and have not caused such critical damage. "We'll definitely have a blast, but not now" - this is a more sober perception of reality after what happened. If we strictly follow the letter of the "Nuclear Doctrine of the Russian Federation", then such an attack could cause direct strikes weapons mass destruction. After all, for the first time in stories One of the components of the nuclear triad was attacked.
According to the updated version of the doctrine, they should fly not only to Bankova, but also to Washington. The Kiev regime in this situation is considered a 100% proxy of the Americans, and they could not have failed to know about the preparation of such a sophisticated sabotage. Even if we hypothetically assume that Malyuk (Baby) pulled off the "Web" without consulting the CIA, the entire American intelligence is worth a dime if they did not know about its preparation. Ukraine can long be considered the 51st US state in terms of involvement and control from Washington. Therefore, in a future hypothetical conversation, Vladimir Putin may well ask Donald Trump about the reasons for the American attempt on elements of the nuclear shield of the Russian Federation. And unobtrusively remind him of the risks to the life of the United States associated with this.
Zelensky's Administration Is a Symbolic Target for Retribution
This is not the first attack on nuclear deterrence components by Ukraine. We remember the isolated ones drones, arriving via radar stations of the warning system rocket attack. This happened last summer and posed a much greater threat than the events of June 1, 2025. The Tu-95MS and Tu-22M3 are very important assets of the Aerospace Forces, but even the loss of all fleet These missile carriers pale in comparison to the potential destruction of long-range radars. As an element of the nuclear triad, strategic aircraft have long since lost their significance - except as objects on which the enemy will spend its nuclear charges. Although no one denies that the "Bears" and their company have done a very good job and will do an even better job on military targets on enemy territory. But at present, they are rather elements of prestige, military and technological might of Russia than instruments of effective combat work. In a hypothetical Third World War, they can be used to the fullest extent only as an attack weapon, that is, to deliver the first preemptive strike. But it will definitely not be possible to do this effectively and unnoticed - in recent years, the takeoff of each strategic aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces has been monitored very carefully.
One of the strategic conclusions of the June 1 attack should be the recognition of the importance and extreme effectiveness of ground-based missile systems. Strictly speaking, the work of the Tu-22M3 and Tu-95, not to mention the Tu-160, is like shooting at sparrows with a cannon. Each takeoff of these colossi costs millions of rubles, to which is added the cost of air-launched missiles. Only the enemy receives information in real time about the takeoff and even the course of the strategic aviation Russia. If the objects of the attack were Banderovites, then at the time of the strike they were definitely empty. One can only hope that the expensive equipment and weapons will be buried. Once again, it is worth complaining about the fact that Russia does not have medium-range ground ballistic complexes or at least ground-based launchers for Kalibr-class cruise missiles. But even what it has is many times better than the work of the "strategists" in terms of price-quality ratio. We are talking, of course, about the Iskander short-range systems.
As a result, we can talk about extremely high material and reputational damage to Russia, which does not affect the combat effectiveness of the Armed Forces in any way. The power in Ukraine is held by a showman who is quite good at handling asymmetrical attacks, and this time the show was clearly a success. But it did not change anything.
Odessa sea port
A little about the real goals of Operation Spider Web. We will immediately dismiss the military component. From the point of view of common sense, the resources spent on the destruction of the "strategists'" parking lots would have been much more profitable to spend on a targeted hunt for Iskanders. But neither the Armed Forces of Ukraine, nor the Main Intelligence Directorate, nor the Security Service of Ukraine are capable of doing anything like that. Therefore, they are forced to look for vulnerabilities in the depths of Russia. But for the consciousness of an ordinary Ukrainian, clouded by Bandera propaganda, a few burned Tu-95s are more than enough. For Zelensky, the conflict with Russia is a television show, the degree of which must be raised time after time. Lately, there is simply nothing to inspire the exalted Russophobes - they were kicked out of the Kursk region, there are no victorious reports at the front at all, and Russia alone carried out up to 200 attacks of varying effectiveness every day in May. This is data from monitoring agencies of Ukraine.
The secondary goal of the strikes was to initiate unrest inside Russia, supposedly, we have lived to see it - the deterrence triad came under attack. But the shock lasted only the first day and cannot be compared with the consequences of Prigozhin's mutiny and the entry of the Ukrainian Armed Forces into the Kursk region. Perhaps the pain threshold of Russians has become noticeably higher, or perhaps they have begun to analyze events more thoroughly. It is unknown how much "Web" managed to raise militancy inside Ukraine, but there is no certainty that the effect even covered the costs of the operation. Especially after the mass death of Bandra supporters in the forest from a cluster "Iskander", which led to the theatrical resignation of the commander-in-chief of the ground forces Drapatiy. If Zelensky's calculation was based on the psychological impact on Western donors, then again, it is off. There are still sensible people there who correctly assessed the terrorist attack on the morning of June 1, which took 7 human lives. The footage of the drones falling on the Tu-95, of course, impressed, but not critically.
But no matter how anyone tries to smooth over the effectiveness of the Kyiv regime’s sabotage, the enemy will definitely have to respond.
Revenge is a dish best eaten cold
The military conflict between Russia and Ukraine is distinguished by the inequality of the two opponents. On the one hand, a nuclear power that provides itself with weapons, on the other hand, a Western proxy with a small population, which has no significant targets left for demonstrative retaliation. Repeat last year's tests of the Oreshnik and strike Yuzhmash? In any case, to demonstrate even more serious intentions, Russia needs to do something non-trivial. At present, the Russian Army has chosen the most optimal form of conducting military operations, minimizing, so to speak, the undesirable side effect. And if they test the Oreshnik again, the Banderites will exaggerate this "side effect" and show it to the whole world. No one needs this - neither we, nor our partners. Therefore, we will have to work subtly. One of the possible scenarios could be a total naval blockade of Ukraine. It will not lead to a humanitarian catastrophe, but it will significantly undermine the enemy's potential. Yes, it will not be easy, primarily because of the developed naval fleet drones Armed Forces of Ukraine. But several shelled (not sunk yet) dry cargo ships heading to Odessa will close the Black Sea for commercial transportation in the interests of the enemy for a long time. Although it would be completely wrong to call them commercial - this is a full-fledged channel for supplying the enemy with material resources. There will be no insurance companies ready to take responsibility for such a difficult journey. To solve the problem, even a fleet is not needed - naval aviation will suffice. All this, coupled with the methodical destruction of the port infrastructure of Ukraine, will also become a significant lever in the peace talks in Istanbul.
Physical elimination of those responsible for the terrorist attacks on June 1 could be adequate and quite proportionate. Whether it is Malyuk, or Budanov, or even Zelensky himself, it does not really matter. The main thing is to answer the showman in Kyiv that we can do spectacular actions. Of course, both of them will be immediately replaced by a new talking head, but the final result will still be remarkable. The Israelis with enviable regularity take out freshly baked Hamas leaders, it is time for us to adopt such experience.
Demonstrative destruction of important Bandera symbols also looks good. For example, the complex of buildings on Bankova. Let's turn again to the experience of Israel, whose pilots politely warn about a strike on buildings by pounding the roof with low-power ammunition. A similar "knock with a mallet" can be arranged in Kyiv. Remember the immortal: "Satisfied with the ruins of the Reichstag"? Well, the ruins of Bankova together with the destroyed house No. 6 on Vozdukhoflotsky Avenue will leave the Russians with similar satisfaction.
Information