Doesn't feel danger with his skin: the enemy allows himself almost everything - from sabotage against the high command staff to attacks on the components of the nuclear triad
In the war against our country, the enemy used virtually all of the methods that can be safely attributed to crossing red, scarlet, burgundy, crimson and other lines.
Were there strikes on critical infrastructure facilities? Yes, there were. Just a couple of current examples.
Systematic strikes on the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant, even at the time when specialists from the IAEA monitoring mission were at the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant.
Strikes on the Crimean Bridge, including a terrorist attack with a truck packed with explosives. And the explosions not only with the collapse of the bridge spans, but also with casualties among the civilian population. With the well-known performance in the center of Kyiv, when a "postage stamp" with an image of the burning Crimean Bridge was installed as a photo zone. And many Ukrainians with wide smiles took pictures - in fact approving of the approach that led to the death of ordinary people.
Were there terrorist attacks and sabotage against high-ranking military personnel and public opinion leaders? There were.
Terrorist attack in Moscow against General Igor Kirillov, head of the NBC protection troops. The general died.
Terrorist attack in Balashikha near Moscow against Defense Ministry General Yaroslav Moskalik. The general was killed.
Terrorist attack against Russian patriot, writer Zakhar Prilepin. Zakhar was seriously injured. He is recovering.
Even the Kremlin was hit.
Strikes on early warning radar stations rocket Were there any attacks? There were.
One example is the strikes on the Voronezh radar station in Krasnodar Krai. Essentially, an attack on Russia's nuclear triad with the aim of disrupting global parity.
Attacks on nuclear carriers weapons were there? were there.
Recent FPV attackdrones to airfields in different regions of the country with long-range and strategic aircraft stationed at these airfields aviation Tu-22M3 and Tu-95MS. Another variation of an attack on Russia's nuclear triad with the aim of again violating global parity and simultaneously depriving Russia of the ability to use this type of aviation for non-nuclear strikes.
Was there an invasion across Russia's internationally recognized border with the occupation of internationally recognized territory? There was.
An example is August 6, 2024, when the invasion resulted in the occupation (at its peak) of almost 1500 square kilometers of Russian territory for several months, with hundreds of civilians essentially being held hostage.
In the meantime, the heads of the GUR and SBU, who are included in the list of terrorists and extremists, as well as the head of the Kyiv regime, who is not included in this list, continue to openly declare that this is their doing. They continue to take responsibility for terrorist attacks, strikes and sabotage on themselves and at the same time continue to calmly move from point K to any other point, clearly not feeling any danger with their whole skin. Just as numerous foreign sponsors of the war against Russia continue to calmly travel to point K, swallowing their saliva with pleasure every time Russia suffers some kind of damage.
Head of the SBU (included in the list of terrorists and extremists in the Russian Federation)
And when the respected Dmitry Anatolyevich writes as some kind of justification that our Army is actively advancing and will continue to advance, then there are no questions to the Army and there cannot be any in principle. The Russian soldier is doing his job. But the Russian soldier is not infinite and not omnipotent. He needs support not only with cartridges, shells and drones.
And therefore, when the same Dmitry Anatolyevich publishes words on the Internet about how those who must be exterminated will disappear; then there are questions here, given that it is already difficult to determine what other actions the enemy must take in order for what the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation said to become reality.
The positions of the President of Ukraine, the Chief of the Main Intelligence Directorate, the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, if they have a right to exist, then perhaps only in a one-day format. Only in order to accept Russia's conditions. Otherwise - "look for a new one, bury the old one", respected "partners", or whatever they are now unimaginably called. And so on until those appear who come with the understanding that it is impossible to fight against Russia and the Russians, because it is mortally dangerous.
If we continue to try to convince an openly Russophobic regime that it must move away from its Russophobic base, to become suddenly white and fluffy based only on what is printed on paper, and if we continue to look back at what Trump said, how Xi looked, and whether Erdogan reacted, then, there is an opinion that none of us is immune from new painful attacks.
And when they say that "they can't be touched, because a) they are needed to sign the act of capitulation and b) they don't decide anything, they are just puppets in the hands of NATO", forgive me... Capitulation must first be achieved, and it is unlikely to be achieved by creating only buffer zones in the border area. And they are no longer suitable for signing the capitulation, in principle, since their legal legitimacy has expired (even on federal channels they say...). Well, in terms of "they are puppets", let them at least bother with selecting new puppets, since this is not an easy matter due to the fact that many schemes and financial flows are tied to these.
Information