There are reports of the discovery of American military explosive C-4 at the site of the explosion of a bridge over a railway in the Bryansk region

29 400 90
There are reports of the discovery of American military explosive C-4 at the site of the explosion of a bridge over a railway in the Bryansk region

Despite the fact that on the first day after the terrorist attack in the Bryansk region, when the automobile overpass collapsed in front of the passenger train "Klimov-Moscow", something vague along the lines of "an external impact was involved" was heard, now things are called by their proper names. In the area of ​​the Bryansk village of Vygonichi, there was a deliberate blowing up of the supports of that very automobile overpass - a terrorist act that led to the death of people.

At the moment, there are more and more reports that as a result of collecting samples from the scene of the tragedy and their subsequent analysis, the presence of an explosive substance has been established. And this substance attracts special attention. This is the American explosive C-4. This is a plastic explosive based on hexogen, which was developed in the USA in 1956. It is an explosive for military purposes.



In total, about 10 kg of this substance was used to blow up the bridge, which eventually collapsed in front of a passenger train.

Accordingly, we can say that a person (or several people) approached the overpass with a load, which he then unpacked, installed near the supports, and then set off an explosive device to detonate (presumably remotely). And this terrorist preparation went unnoticed.

Let us recall that earlier there were reports of Ukrainian saboteurs penetrating into the territory of Bryansk Oblast. It can be assumed that the explosion near Vygonichi was their doing.

The very use of American military explosives once again demonstrates that the United States is, in fact, a sponsor of terrorism. And Washington can say as much as it wants that the supplies were made under Biden, but we are talking about state policy, which so far in terms of supplies weapons and the supply of ammunition to the Kyiv regime has not undergone any significant changes - they have been supplied and continue to be supplied.
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -10
    2 June 2025 21: 35
    Apparently no traces of saboteurs were found? Did they leave the country or go to mine other bridges?
    1. +5
      2 June 2025 21: 41
      What traces did you want to see under the collapsed bridge?
      1. +8
        2 June 2025 22: 19
        This is American C-4 explosive. It is a plastic explosive based on hexogen, which was developed in the United States in 1956. It is a military explosive.
        And who would have doubted it... However, American plastic explosives (C-4) were previously supplied to the Outskirts and were widely used by Ukrainian saboteurs... So there is nothing surprising in this and it is unlikely to become a sensation... Unfortunately, we have become accustomed to the fact that the cities of Donbass are shelled by American HIMARS missile systems, with the accompanying deaths of civilians, and somehow we do not have complexes about this... Well, maybe it is time for us to stop having complexes...??? am
      2. -3
        2 June 2025 22: 20
        There are many methods for finding traces among forensic scientists, a criminal is either caught with a bomb, or they follow the tracks. But finding traces of the USA, and then throwing up our hands and saying - well, we are not going to fight with them now - is a hack job
        1. +2
          2 June 2025 22: 26
          If the terrorists are caught, it doesn’t matter at all where they got the explosives from, it doesn’t affect the sentence, it’s just a pity there is no death penalty.
          1. +3
            3 June 2025 03: 02
            It's just a pity there is no death penalty.
            +++++++
            Damn you, this death penalty.
            If only there was hard labor. In shackles. Wake up at 6.00:24, lights out at 00:XNUMX. Three meals a day of pearl barley. Socialist competition: whoever gives the country more coal gets an extra portion of pearl barley. And the Ecilops won't beat you at night. :)
            1. 0
              3 June 2025 08: 32
              Will you become an overseer of a brigade of Bandar-logs in a camp in sunny Morguda or should someone else fulfill your wishes? wink
            2. +1
              3 June 2025 08: 35
              I believe that there is no need to feed and treat terrorists.
        2. +9
          2 June 2025 22: 55
          Quote from alexoff
          But to find traces of the US, and then to throw up our hands and say - well, we won't fight with them now - that's a hack job.

          What traces of the USA - explosives invented in 1956? Can you imagine how much of it was produced and distributed to other countries during this time? But traces of the GUR or SBU are clearly visible to the naked eye.
          1. +6
            3 June 2025 01: 48
            C-4, also known as plastid, is produced in a bunch of countries. We have an analogue, too.
          2. 0
            3 June 2025 19: 10
            No need to strain yourself too much in searching for the perpetrators. Three banditologists - Zelibaba, Pig-nosed and Mamkin Pirozhok. Deliver to the territory of the Russian Federation and all secrets will become clear.
        3. +6
          2 June 2025 23: 36
          Theater of the absurd, traces of C-4 were found, we will once again express our indignation, everyone understood everything and remained with their own.
          1. +4
            3 June 2025 00: 23
            Quote: tatarin1972
            found traces of C-4, once again we will express our indignation,
            and drew conclusions
            that the US is, in fact, a sponsor of terrorism
            . Indeed, where are we and where is America.
            The main thing is that no one "accidentally" accuses Zelensky's regime of terrorism, and the most expired chieftain is not made the head of a terrorist regime. In this case, the entire strategy of the SVO will have to be changed to a CTO (counter-terrorist operation). It will be necessary to destroy the leaders of the Kyiv regime, eliminate their supply and financing channels. It is not for nothing that they say "one man's war is another man's mother."
            1. +9
              3 June 2025 01: 07
              Quote: Vitaly_pvo
              In this case, the entire strategy of the SVO will have to be changed to the CTO (counter-terrorist operation).

              We had a CTO in Kursk Oblast, maybe we still have one, I don't know. At the same time, there are no terrorists, no terrorist organization, no leader. We have been wiping our asses with our own words for a long time, and especially with laws. On what basis was Medvedchuk exchanged for the Dung People? In the results of the massacre in Crocus, the bandits were assisted by foreign intelligence, which one - apparently the Investigative Committee was unable to find out fool
    2. 0
      2 June 2025 22: 49
      Ask them why they haven't been caught yet, why they do a bad job, etc.
      During the war, in the Bryansk forests, the Germans were unable to wipe out the partisans throughout the war.
      According to established data, the bridge was inspected an hour before the explosion, there was nothing foreign. Of course, they will be caught and most likely they will be caught, but it is physically impossible to secure all secondary highways.
      There are a bunch of sabotage and reconnaissance groups roaming around there, just like ours in their rear, and even with good group training, it is not realistic to 100% exclude such cases.
      1. +2
        3 June 2025 01: 11
        We practically don't catch Ukrainian citizens, locals or migrants - as many as you like. And who killed Kiva, who blew up the Ka-52 at the airfield in 2022, who dropped bombs from Mavics on the Ily-76 of the Pskov paratroopers that same year, who blew up Dugina and many others - there is no word about them at all. And who is caught, like the general's killer was brought from Turkey, another question - are they not exchanged?
        1. +1
          3 June 2025 10: 53
          Quote from alexoff
          blew up Dugina

          Dugina
          2022
          Monday, August 22, the FSB officially announced that the crime had been solved. The agency's Public Relations Center reported that the crime had been prepared and committed by Ukrainian special services. The executor is a citizen of Ukraine Natalia Pavlovna Vovk, born in 1979, who lived in the same house with Darya Dugina. Immediately after the crime, Vovk and her daughter left for Estonia through the Pskov region. It is known that the criminal traveled in Mini Cooper cars and was also present at the Traditsiya festival.
          Andrei Kuznetsov and Aleksandr Suchkov, accused of forging documents that, according to investigators, helped Natalia Vovk commit murder, were sentenced to 3 years and 6 months in prison
          1. -2
            3 June 2025 12: 50
            Immediately after the crime, Vovk and her daughter traveled through the Pskov region to Estonia.
            went abroad
            Andrey Kuznetsov and Alexander Suchkov
            Apparently ours? Yes, they were caught, although they were just making fake documents for everyone. They'll probably put the warehouse owner in jail for the planes and leave it at that. And the bomb maker, Ukrainian citizen Tsyganenko, went abroad and that's it.
  2. +2
    2 June 2025 21: 35
    The use of American military explosives once again demonstrates that the United States is, in fact, a sponsor of terrorism.
    And who doubts this?
    1. 0
      2 June 2025 21: 56
      Well, if they "discovered"...Now, we're waiting for Trump's call with an "apology"...()
    2. +12
      2 June 2025 22: 11
      The origin of the explosives can only be determined after analyzing the markers. The fact that the Americans invented C4 is not proof of their guilt... The Chinese invented gunpowder. No one has made any claims against them yet. hi
      1. +7
        2 June 2025 22: 45
        Have you forgotten about novice? It was enough that it was invented in the ussr...
        1. 0
          3 June 2025 06: 52
          I prefer objectivity to idiocy and far-fetched accusations. Want to squeal "highly likely?" good luck... hi
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +2
      3 June 2025 01: 53
      Quote: lwxx
      The use of American military explosives once again demonstrates that the United States is, in fact, a sponsor of terrorism.

      Well, the US is a separate topic. But in general, with such statements, the Chinese, the inventors of gunpowder, can be called sponsors of terrorism.
  3. 0
    2 June 2025 21: 38
    So-so proof.
    With such a number of trophies
    1. +2
      2 June 2025 21: 42
      Quote: Billi Bons1972
      So-so proof.
      With such a number of trophies

      And you, I suppose, are one of the adherents of the theory that "the bridge fell by itself" and that neither Ukraine nor the West are "innocent", right? Although who and why am I asking - the message of the comment is clear anyway.
      1. 0
        2 June 2025 23: 12
        I'm talking about what the potential culprits will say in response.
  4. +2
    2 June 2025 21: 40
    The US continues to arm terrorists, so there is nothing surprising about it.
  5. +2
    2 June 2025 21: 41
    Be sure to trust the Americans They are not going to deceive you and they understand a language other than the language of force I emphasize that they understand
    1. 0
      2 June 2025 22: 06
      I see sarcasm in your phrase. wink
  6. +10
    2 June 2025 21: 46
    The very use of American military explosives once again demonstrates that the United States is, in fact, a sponsor of terrorism.

    Holy shit! Who and where hasn't used C-4! Because it:
    It is a plastic explosive based on hexogen, which was developed in the USA in 1956.

    In terms of its worldwide distribution, it is a competitor to the Kalashnikovs and Arkas.
    The very use of American military explosives once again demonstrates that the United States is, in fact, a sponsor of terrorism.

    What then can be said about the Swedes with their Nobel and his dynamite? laughing
    1. -11
      2 June 2025 21: 48
      Quote: Adrey
      Holy shit! Who and where hasn't used C-4!

      Who and where hasn't used it, but until now no one has used it against passenger trains. That's the catch, you see.
      Quote: Adrey
      What then can be said about the Swedes with their Nobel and his dynamite?

      People died. A 4-month-old baby is in critical condition in intensive care. Is this a reason to bare our teeth here?
      1. +4
        2 June 2025 22: 44
        Quote: Volodin
        People died. A 4-month-old child is in critical condition in intensive care. Is this a reason to bare your teeth here?

        Please don't turn my post inside out with your perception and emotions. Where is the mention of victims in the note? It is dedicated to the means and method of carrying out sabotage.
        Regardless of the above, I once again mourn the innocent victims of MY war and my condolences to their families. May the wounded survive and recover, preferably without irreparable consequences.
        My laughter is caused by the crude and completely untalented propaganda that the article is. Maybe you are the author, that you react so emotionally? Then perhaps you should have left your signature under the material?
    2. 0
      2 June 2025 21: 52
      Do you have any doubts that the Americans supply the Banderites with C4? They themselves officially announced this under Biden.
      1. +1
        2 June 2025 21: 56
        Quote: Mars
        Do you have any doubts that the Americans supply the Banderites with C4? They themselves officially announced this under Biden.

        What for?
        In the USSR, a similar explosive of normal power based on hexogen was and is produced in the Russian Federation as an explosive for the USSR/Russian Armed Forces under the name Plastit-4 or PVV-4

        Do you think the Ukrainians can't do it themselves?
        1. -7
          2 June 2025 22: 00
          Why? Banderites do not produce C4, but they need a lot of explosives, including for terrorist attacks, so the Americans supply them.
          1. +4
            2 June 2025 22: 05
            Quote: Mars
            What do you mean, why? Banderites don't produce C4,

            Where does such confidence come from? Because they said on TV that they can't produce anything and that everything is brought to them? Turn off the TV sometimes.
            1. -7
              2 June 2025 22: 13
              The Banderites never produced C4, Javelins, Abrams, all of this is supplied to them by the Americans, are you really completely out of touch?
              1. +6
                2 June 2025 22: 16
                Quote: Mars
                Are you really completely out of the loop?

                In polite society, it is customary to address a stranger as "You", young man.
                Quote: Mars
                Banderites never produced C4

                Once again, for you, a young man who apparently did not live in the USSR and, due to his Unified State Exam education, apparently does not know its composition:
                Quote: Adrey
                In the USSR, similar explosives of normal power based on hexogen were and are produced in the Russian Federation, as VV for the USSR Armed Forces/RF under the name Plastit-4 or PVV-4
                1. -8
                  2 June 2025 22: 22
                  Apparently the Banderites have run out of Soviet supplies, so they are using C4. Maybe you doubt that the Banderites are using Hymars and Bradleys just because they said so on TV?
                  1. +5
                    2 June 2025 22: 26
                    Quote: Mars
                    Apparently the Banderites have run out of Soviet supplies, so they are using C4.

                    I'll give you a good comment from below in the thread.
                    Quote: KCA
                    I'm not an explosives chemist, but C-4 is simply hexogen with a plasticizer, roughly speaking with plasticine or window putty.

                    Hexogen is still not enriched uranium, due to the complexity of production.
                    1. -4
                      2 June 2025 22: 31
                      The Banderites never produced and do not produce C4, and they have no need for it, the Americans and other NATO members supply them with everything they need from C4 to F-16. Is it really so difficult to understand?
                      1. +3
                        2 June 2025 22: 47
                        Quote: Mars
                        Banderites have never produced and do not produce C4

                        Proofs in the studio. Only "gentlemen take your word for it."
                      2. -5
                        2 June 2025 22: 58
                        Proof of something that doesn't exist? laughing
                        Is this humor? laughing
                      3. +1
                        2 June 2025 23: 07
                        Quote: Mars
                        Proof of something that doesn't exist?
                        Is this humor?

                        Young man, The burden of proof lies with the applicant. Therefore, you must provide documentary evidence that C-4 is not produced in Ukraine. It is not up to me to prove the opposite to you.
                      4. -4
                        2 June 2025 23: 14
                        And will you also demand proof about the fact that there are no aliens in Ukraine? laughing
                      5. +3
                        3 June 2025 02: 21
                        Quote: Mars
                        The Banderites never produced and do not produce C4, and they have no need for it, the Americans and other NATO members supply them with everything they need from C4 to F-16. Is it really so difficult to understand?

                        Mars, excuse me, what education do you have? You obviously skipped chemistry at school. You can nitrate urotropine and get hexogen even at home. And at almost any chemical plant this can be done industrially.
                      6. 0
                        3 June 2025 08: 30
                        Why this circus with horses if the Americans supply the Banderites with C4 by the ton?
                      7. -1
                        3 June 2025 16: 20
                        Quote: Mars
                        Why this circus with horses if the Americans supply the Banderites with C4 by the ton?

                        Why do Americans need to transport things across the ocean by plane when Europe has plenty of them? They know how to count money.
                      8. 0
                        4 June 2025 20: 52
                        Who can count? Biden has poured billions into a black hole called Ukraine and no one is going to give them back.
                    2. -3
                      2 June 2025 22: 38
                      And can I ask another question? Here, everyone who calls Banderovites Banderovites is actively downvoted? Is this a Ukrainian site?
                      1. +6
                        2 June 2025 22: 49
                        Quote: Mars
                        And can I ask another question? Here, everyone who calls Banderovites Banderovites is actively downvoted? Is this a Ukrainian site?

                        No. The site is absolutely pro-Russian, but there are still quite a lot of smart, educated and sober-minded people on it. request
                      2. -5
                        2 June 2025 23: 00
                        It's strange, but why do so many people doubt that Banderites use C4? And do they also doubt that Banderites use Hayyars and Strikers?
                      3. +1
                        2 June 2025 23: 09
                        Quote: Mars
                        It's strange, but why do so many people doubt that Banderites use C4? And do they also doubt that Banderites use Hayyars and Strikers?

                        Yes, just everything.
                        And are there also doubts here that the Banderites are using Hayyars and Strikers?

                        They don't doubt it, they know it. They "doubt" you. laughing
                      4. -6
                        2 June 2025 23: 12
                        The USSR has been gone for 34 years already, but the consumption of explosives is still going on at a crazy rate, or is logic not your strong point? laughing
                      5. +3
                        2 June 2025 23: 14
                        Quote: Mars
                        or logic is not your strong point?

                        Definitely not yours laughing
                      6. -2
                        2 June 2025 23: 17
                        So, Banderites can use Hymars, but they can't use C4? What's the problem?
                      7. +7
                        2 June 2025 23: 23
                        You've tired me out a bit. laughingMy 9-year-old grandson is more "friendly" with cause-and-effect relationships than you are.
                        If you have decided that with "crackling" phrases and "fiery" slogans in a month you will "earn" "general's" shoulder straps here, then to realize your "dream" you better look for another site laughing.
                        Now I'll say goodbye. hi.
                      8. -6
                        2 June 2025 23: 27
                        Well, finally it dawned on you that the Banderites used American C4 explosives for terrorist attacks. I am glad that despite your old age you were able to understand this.
                      9. +2
                        3 June 2025 03: 46
                        Quote: Mars
                        Well, finally it dawned on you that the Banderites used American C4 explosives for terrorist attacks. I am glad that despite your old age you were able to understand this.

                        Damn, explosives were invented in the States, and only Allah and a bunch of people know where they were produced.
                      10. 0
                        3 June 2025 08: 33
                        In fact, each explosive has its own characteristics and chemical analysis allows this to be determined; if terrorists had used TNT, they would have reported it. It's strange that some people don't understand obvious things.
                      11. -1
                        3 June 2025 16: 35
                        Quote: Mars
                        In fact, each explosive has its own characteristics and chemical analysis allows this to be determined; if terrorists had used TNT, they would have reported it. It's strange that some people don't understand obvious things.

                        The explosives themselves, of course. But it is practically impossible to determine the manufacturer by the oxidized traces of the explosives (after the explosion).
  7. +4
    2 June 2025 21: 49
    Without defending the US in any way, I will note that when half a ton of explosives being transported to Russia were discovered in a minibus at customs in Belarus, they were being transported, I don’t remember exactly, either from Poland or from the Baltics, in other words, from a NATO country. I assume there is plenty of American explosives in all NATO countries for their own “needs”. And who can guarantee that the car with explosives to Russia that was discovered by Belarusian customs was the only one. And how many such cars were not discovered?
  8. KCA
    +12
    2 June 2025 21: 49
    I am not an explosive chemist, but C-4 is simply hexogen with a plasticizer, roughly speaking with plasticine or window putty, can you just tell that it is made in the USA? Don't we have that? We need a comparative spectral analysis, and not immediately shout "made in the USA", I do not argue, it could be from them, now even from what deposit the uranium is from, or where the plutonium was produced, there are methods for determining, but not in 5 minutes
    1. +4
      2 June 2025 22: 26
      Don't we have one like that?

      There is, of course, it's called Plastit-4 (or PVV-4). It was also in the USSR. Plastit is made and used all over the world, it's one of the most common explosives.
    2. +3
      2 June 2025 22: 41
      If you want or don't want to, you can find ears anywhere, anyone's. There is a lot of squealing that excites people in vain now, this is very traditional for our stupid agitprop. There is no point in exciting the people once again with the real-imaginary ears of the USA - because now our elites pray to Trump and the return of Western companies or even the sale of rare earths are seriously discussed. All these stories about C-4 will be forgotten at the snap of a finger IF IT IS NEEDED, and if it is not needed - they will make up new ones. There is no point in getting excited by the primitive crafts of stupid agitprop, in short.
      And on the subject - the raw materials for C-4 could have been bought and made themselves, or stupidly made themselves, or 100500 other options. The SBU are not some kind of slipper-wearing pygmies, they don't need to order such things from Santa Claus for Christmas, they have reserves and laboratories like any special service.
  9. -1
    2 June 2025 22: 03
    Not a bad, no, a good reason to destroy bridges in Ukraine, Bandera's Ukraine. And yet I am not inclined to give in to the panic of many commentators "boss, everything is lost!" They are being crushed at the front. It is visible. Several villages a day. The Bandera front is crumbling little by little.
  10. -2
    2 June 2025 22: 19
    Well, we've identified C-4. What next? The answer, as always, is shameful.
  11. 0
    2 June 2025 22: 20
    You should also check out the drones!
    German Nazis Pistorius, Merz, Kiesewetter and exiled Russian Sergei Sumlenny sent 4000 AI-controlled drones to Ukraine!
    Technical details and the exact location of production were kept secret by both parties for security reasons.
    These are drones capable of penetrating 30-40 kilometers into the country and attacking command posts, logistics hubs and other facilities. The drone is capable of "bypassing enemy electronic defenses and reaching targets even in the event of interference," Pistorius added.
    Once programmed, the so-called kamikaze drone flies independently to the target and attacks it.
    The company that produces these drones, Helsing, is based in Munich.

    It would not be surprising if it were German drones that attacked airfields.
  12. +4
    2 June 2025 22: 24
    In total, about 10 kg of this substance was used to blow up the bridge, which eventually collapsed in front of a passenger train.

    Of course not 10. After all, it is a bridge with 4 traffic lanes, and not some pedestrian one. And although the explosives are American, it is not a fact that they were brought from the USA. NATO is a large bloc.
  13. +9
    2 June 2025 22: 28
    There are reports of the discovery of American military explosive C-4 at the site of the explosion of a bridge over a railway in the Bryansk region

    A sensation from the category "Ukrainian UAVs used "carrots" from RPG-7".
    The modern world is permeated with the export of weapons and explosives, they sell, buy, re-export. This C-4 could have been bought 7 years ago or a month ago, and not necessarily from the Americans, they could have bought it from the Mujahideen, or from the Iraqis, they could have welded it themselves. The C-4 is not an antimatter bomb, but a developer whose grandchildren already have beards, as they say.
  14. -2
    2 June 2025 22: 34
    There are reports of the discovery of American military explosive C-4 at the site of the explosion of a bridge over a railway in the Bryansk region

    And what benefit does this give us?
    Should we hold Trump accountable?
  15. +3
    2 June 2025 22: 37
    Accordingly, we can say that a person (or several people) approached the overpass with a load, which he then unpacked, installed near the supports, and then set off an explosive device to detonate (presumably remotely). And this terrorist preparation went unnoticed.

    Was the bridge guarded somehow? Unnoticed? Elementary! A Gazelle with the sign "Road Service" pulled up, people in work overalls got out, put up "Road Repair" signs and calmly laid down whatever they wanted. They just as calmly packed up, got into the Gazelle and drove away. Who would have thought to suspect something was wrong?
    P.S. In the period 1975-1980, or even a little later, I saw a man with a gun and a booth at the very entrance to the bridge across the Berezina (Berezino, BSSR), on the Minsk-Mogilev highway. Yes, the bridge was listed as strategic at the time (arched, iron), but it was 1980! 35 years had passed since the Great Patriotic War. Doesn't that mean anything?
  16. +4
    2 June 2025 22: 45
    What nonsense? C4 is produced under license and without, in more than a dozen countries. That is, by supplying chemical weapons and adjusting strikes on cities, the US is not an accomplice or accomplice to terrorism, and the traces of C4 clearly indicate this?
    Just once you spread your buns, you have to be ready to get it there all the time.
    All the red lines, happily loved, that it became a meme about felt-tip pens. Starting with the English destroyer in Crimean waters and ending with the cruise missiles that flew over the cities. What, besides puffed-up cheeks, did they undertake to attack the Nord Stream? It's already funny, especially against the background of the imprisoned Popov and Shoigu, whose deputies are all thieves, and he is D'Artagnan.
    It's painful even to remember Prigozhin and Utkin.
  17. 0
    2 June 2025 22: 48
    What does this change? Nothing at all. The Americans participating in this terrorist attack could have given either their own explosives or someone else's....and why would they give themselves away by giving away their own? That's why the Ukrainians themselves specifically took the American C-4 in order to push them apart...even if the Americans really helped, they certainly could have given someone else's C-4...so whether it was a C-4 or not doesn't make any sense at all and there will be no consequences at all. The Great Putin didn't do anything at all even after Crocus. He only shook the air once about some kind of retaliation...and now they say there is no evidence that the Americans and the Shavens and even the Ukrainians were involved.
  18. BAI
    +1
    2 June 2025 23: 08
    The very use of American military explosives

    Yes, this explosive is everywhere. Especially in Ukraine. There is no other there.
  19. +4
    2 June 2025 23: 12
    Hmm... But what do the Kalashnikov assault rifles in service with the Ukrainian Armed Forces say? What interference?
  20. +5
    2 June 2025 23: 22
    The use of American military explosives once again demonstrates that the United States is, in fact, a sponsor of terrorism


    I don't argue with the thesis, but I categorically disagree with the argument: this C4 is like Mr. behind the bathhouse in every country of the alliance. With such logic, any movement with the AK is a confirmation of Russia's participation in this event. So, author, don't pull an owl onto the globe!
  21. 0
    2 June 2025 23: 29
    Personally, I am amazed by the ease with which this whole story was carried out in the frontline areas on infrastructure facilities: they went in - planted - left - blew up.
    Many people write that, supposedly, there are so many bridges in Russia - you can't put a guard at each one. But what's the problem with sticking a camera there and recording everyone hanging out near the supports? If the operator noticed a crowd of people or a stop in transport - they would send a patrol there, and that's it - the enemy wouldn't succeed... How is it that all of Moscow is covered with cameras - and here, excuse me, there is no money, but you hang in there...
  22. 0
    2 June 2025 23: 50
    What difference does it make where the explosives were brought from (they could have been brought to Ukraine from NATO countries), it is more important to punish the perpetrators and organizers of the murder of people. And it is no less important to prevent such occurrences in the future, the death penalty would solve this problem.
  23. +3
    3 June 2025 00: 05
    Well, so??? Have they established it?? What next??! Three years ago, when they were bringing in refugees in droves from... well, from there (I got 2 bans for naming this country), it was said that there was a trainload of sleeping people there. Did someone work them off? Well, now they have worked them off.
    1. +1
      3 June 2025 02: 57
      My neighbor upstairs wanted to rent out his apartment to the Uzbeks. I came up to him and explained clearly that he was in danger of being beaten with double penetration. During the conversation, the chump muttered something about Batu and ran away. And after a conciliatory libation, the neighbor rented out the apartment to my friends from Lugansk. Because the separatists had trashed everything there.
      1. 0
        3 June 2025 08: 05
        Uzbeks pay much more))) only then you have to repair the house)))))
  24. +1
    3 June 2025 02: 12
    As for "incomprehensibility" - they can spout nonsense bordering on idiocy!!! Explosions in the landing bay in the VLDV - ".......2 gas cylinders exploded", because of these cylinders all the special services were "on their ears" - stop considering people idiots. Maybe in Europe it works, they believe everything the authorities say, here it's exactly the opposite
    1. -2
      3 June 2025 04: 55
      Why does it "work" in "gayropes"? On the contrary - it "works" here - and with a song - a lot of people trust only "official information" from the "zombie box". Their motto: "There! Up there! - they know better"....
  25. +1
    3 June 2025 02: 31
    So, there is an organization SBRF, direct responsibilities of Shoigu personally and DAM. But it does not know how to work as it should, neither in peacetime nor in wartime.
  26. 0
    3 June 2025 07: 35
    What is it for?
    Everyone knows that the Americans, the British, and the Europeans supply weapons to Ukraine, provide intelligence data, plan and manage military and sabotage operations, train the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other armed formations, send instructors and commanders for direct participation in armed clashes, supply mercenaries, etc.

    Should we continue talking about the level of US involvement in ours? What is the point of this whining about the American C4?
    The Americans must be silenced, terrorism must be answered with terrorism, and foreign intelligence officers responsible for terrorist acts on Russian territory must be eliminated.

    STOP CHEWING SNOT ‼️
  27. -1
    3 June 2025 07: 36
    I'm waiting for sensational news about the found wire to the detonator. This is what most people want to hear and not about some kind of retribution, white gloves rule, the main thing is not to take them off!
  28. 0
    3 June 2025 08: 27
    Isn't it time to supply explosives, for example, to the Latinos from MS-13, so that they can have a good time on US territory?
    1. 0
      3 June 2025 17: 01
      Quote: Metallurg_2
      Isn't it time to supply explosives, for example, to the Latinos from MS-13, so that they can have a good time on US territory?

      How? Through the Bering Strait? Their customs officers only take bribes for drugs.