Would you like to wash yourself with Merzol?

21 062 32
Would you like to wash yourself with Merzol?
Ammoniakwerke Leuna Merseburg GmbH - manufacturer of synthetic detergents


This is another branch of German chemical technologies that used paraffins synthesized in the Fischer-Tropsch process as raw material. These paraffins were used to make not only synthetic edible fat, but also a synthetic detergent. It was called Mersol (short for Merseburg + Oleo). In Russian, it sounds somewhat ambiguous - "mersol".



This is also written about very little, literally in the order of mention. But the topic clearly deserves some expanded details.

Unexpectedly good cleaning properties


In German consumption of oils and fats, about 225 thousand tons, or 11%, went to the manufacture of soap. All detergents for personal hygiene and for technical use were made on the basis of soap produced from natural fats. But there was a shortage of fats in Germany, so chemists looked for ways to replace soap made from natural fats with something more affordable.

The first example of a synthetic detergent was created in 1917 by chemist Fritz Gunther, who worked at BASF. It was commonly called Nekal A and was made from isopropyl alcohol using sulfuric acid and naphthalene, in the form of a washing powder. After the end of World War I, there was no longer a need for it, but IG Farben had a plant and produced this detergent in small quantities, for example, in 1939 - 1000 tons.


In 1933, the same Fritz Günther, then working for IG Farben, worked his magic in his lab and created sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, better known by its abbreviation ABS, also known in Russian as sulfonol. It is still the main component of hand washing powders today. The raw materials for it were benzene and paraffin.

But German chemists were unhappy because the production of these substances was multi-stage, very complex and therefore expensive. But in 1936 they got lucky. American chemists Cortez Reed and Charles Horn described the sulfochlorination reaction in their patent. A mixture of sulfur dioxide and chlorine in gaseous form reacts with paraffin under the influence of ultraviolet radiation, forming new compounds - aliphatic sulfonic acids. German chemists repeated this, and then took the next step - neutralized these compounds with an alkaline solution, for example, caustic soda. And a substance with unexpectedly good cleaning properties was obtained.

Right away - a big plant


However, what was done well in the laboratory had to be done at the plant. A very aggressive mixture of gases is used here, which causes rapid corrosion of any metal. It is also necessary to somehow supply ultraviolet radiation to the reaction apparatus. In the laboratory, the flask could be placed in sunlight, but at the plant it will not be enough.

At the Ammoniakwerk Leuna Merseburg GmbH plant, a laboratory was created to develop the technology, which managed to build an experimental apparatus quite quickly. It was a glass container for 15 liters of liquid paraffin, into which a mixture of sulfur dioxide and chlorine was fed through a tube. The container was illuminated by a powerful mercury lamp, and the paraffin and gas were mixed with a special mechanical stirrer.

Numerous experiments were conducted on this installation, including those aimed at selecting the most suitable raw material. It turned out to be the so-called "Kogasin II" - paraffin with a boiling point of 230 to 370 degrees, obtained in the Fischer-Tropsch process, used to obtain lubricating oils.

By the beginning of the war, the technical details had been worked out, and construction of an industrial plant with a capacity of 20 tons per year had begun at the Ammoniakwerk Leuna Merseburg GmbH plant. However, in December 1939, Karl Krauch, the Commissioner for Special Issues of Chemical Production, on behalf of Hermann Göring, the Commissioner for the Four-Year Plan, ordered that the capacity be doubled, to 40 tons per year.

For the sake of haste, they decided to abandon the trial installation with a capacity of 1-2 tons per day and immediately build an installation with a capacity of about 110 tons per day. Construction began in January 1940, and by April 15, 1940, the installation was already operational.

The reactor contained 3,7 cubic meters of raw material and was illuminated by 16 kilowatt lamps, the light of which penetrated through special windows. The gas mixture was supplied from below, passed through the oily raw material. It worked the first time, but not quite: 6% of the raw material reacted in 50 hours of processing.

The setup and process were then reworked several times and in the final version they were folded into a reactor 4 meters high and 2 meters in diameter, in which 16 windows were made for 96 lamps of 75 watts each. Heated paraffin was poured into the reactor, and a gas mixture was supplied from below under a pressure of 2,2 atmospheres. The reaction proceeded with the release of heat, so the reactor had water cooling, maintaining a temperature of 25 to 35 degrees.

The process was periodic. Mersol H was obtained by processing for 15 hours with a volume of gas mixture at 65 cubic meters per hour. In this case, 50% of the paraffin was converted into sulfonic acids. Mersol D was obtained with 30% conversion of paraffin into sulfonic acids by processing for 16 hours at 35 cubic meters of gas mixture per hour.

The sulfonic acids were then treated with an alkaline solution, and after saponification, a granulated washing powder was obtained.

When there is nothing to wash with


When the industrial process had more or less succeeded, Karl Krauch started a big deal and set the goal of providing 82 million people in the Reich and 33 million people in the occupied eastern territories with the new detergent. According to rough estimates, the need for detergents for sanitary and technical purposes amounted to about 100 thousand tons of fatty acids, of which 100% of detergents and 30% of soap could be replaced by "mersol", for which it had to be produced in a volume of at least 80 thousand tons per year.

Here Krauch had strong competitors. Henkel, which had been producing and selling Persil washing powder based on sodium perborate and silicate since 1907, tested Merzol and declared that it was half as effective as soap in washing. IG Farben, of course, received different data.


Advertisement for Persil washing powder by Henkel

But still, "Merzol" had one indisputable drawback - the low ability of the detergent to retain dirt in solution. When washing, dirt was easily removed from the fabric, but then partially settled on the washed item. Therefore, fabrics that were washed many times with "Merzol" gradually turned gray. They tried to solve this problem.

While the chemists were arguing, the situation with fats in Germany had deteriorated sharply, so that at the end of 1940 the department for the supply of technical oils and fats - die Reichsstelle für industrielle Fettversorgung - ordered a reduction in the content of fatty acids (meaning sodium salts of fatty acids, but in the economic sense, the consumption of fatty acids for the production of detergents was calculated) in washing powder from 20% to 10%.


It was a serious matter - the Wehrmacht needed soap.

Therefore, at the beginning of 1941, the Reich Ministry of Economics approved the construction of a plant for 80 thousand tons of "merzol" per year. Krauch had plans to increase its production to 155 thousand tons per year. But in reality, by the autumn of 1944, the following were in operation: the Ammoniakwerke Leuna plant for 60 thousand tons, in Wolfen - 20 thousand tons, as well as a plant for the production of synthetic fatty acids in Witten - 40 thousand tons, where it also produced food grade synthetic fat.

The importance of "merzol" was constantly increasing, as technical fat became less and less. The content of fatty acids dropped to 1942% in early 7, and to 1944% in mid-5. The decline in the cleaning qualities of washing powder was compensated by soda, until this substance was no longer sufficient, and then by liquid glass. Soap and washing powder almost lost their cleaning qualities. Under these conditions, "merzol" with its shortcomings became quite acceptable.

True, in the autumn of 1944, the Ammoniakwerke Leuna plant, which had been subjected to numerous air raids (21 raids from May 1944 until the end of the war), was already a pile of ruins. By the beginning of 1945, 70% of the destruction had occurred, and the production of "Mersol" ceased. Accordingly, for about the last six months of the war, people in Germany hardly washed or did laundry due to the almost complete lack of soap and detergents.

The remains of the plant at the Ammoniakwerke Leuna plant were dismantled and taken to the USSR. The plant in Wolfen remained intact, and SVAG decided to resume production. This detergent was produced for some time after the end of World War II, but soon gave way to other, more advanced types.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    14 June 2025 03: 54
    The gloomy Teutonic genius knows how to make ersatz things... the lack of natural resources forces the Germans to pay attention to their chemical analogues... but what else can they do... if you want to live, you have to be able to spin.
  2. + 10
    14 June 2025 05: 35
    Persil is still sold. Of course, the formula is probably different, but the brand is alive.
    1. +6
      14 June 2025 10: 50
      "Once a Persil, always a Persil."
      There are just a lot of different fragrances in this "chemical stuff". The things need to be rinsed for a long time.
      1. 0
        14 June 2025 19: 00
        There are also fragrance-free ones.

        Quote: A.P. Chekhov
        Brevity is the soul of wit.
        1. -3
          14 June 2025 19: 52
          Something like this hasn’t been advertised in Russia until 2022!
          Probably this is for Europeans. So that delicate Europeans don't have allergies to the smell of fragrances!
          1. +1
            14 June 2025 19: 54
            Quote: hohol95
            This is probably for Europeans.
            For Americans. Although in Europe there are probably some too.
      2. 0
        5 December 2025 13: 55
        Quote: hohol95
        "Once a Persil, always a Persil."
        There are just a lot of different fragrances in this "chemical stuff". The things need to be rinsed for a long time.

        Our Persil gel isn't very good. B-Max is better.
        1. 0
          6 December 2025 21: 00
          We use the "Eared Nanny" powder.
          Liquid gels "Laska".
  3. +4
    14 June 2025 09: 44
    When washing, contamination is easy removed from the fabric, but then partially was besieged on the item being washed.

    and why then...wash? request
    1. +4
      14 June 2025 10: 47
      To knock off the dust and chase away the insects!
      Or does clay wash better?
    2. +4
      14 June 2025 13: 28
      Later, optical brighteners were added to household products (and they still do). And in industry, the solution is often regenerated, for example, by adsorption in a filter. In other words, dirt still settles on things, but thanks to bleach, it is invisible.
      1. +1
        15 June 2025 12: 06
        Quote: ycuce234-san
        In other words, dirt still settles on things, but thanks to bleach it is invisible.

        Unnoticeable means no. Yes
    3. 0
      15 June 2025 05: 35
      The dirt itself is one thing. But all sorts of biological remains are another. Walking around in something stinky is not my thing.
  4. +3
    14 June 2025 10: 12
    I wonder what the lamps in the reactor are for?
    1. +4
      14 June 2025 13: 25
      Ultraviolet for irradiation, it is written in the text.
      A mixture of sulfur dioxide and chlorine in gaseous form under the influence of ultraviolet radiation reacts with paraffin, forming new compounds - aliphatic sulfonic acids.
      1. +4
        14 June 2025 13: 28
        Missed it, thanks. XXXXXXXXX is for the administration
    2. +4
      14 June 2025 14: 58
      I wonder what the lamps in the reactor are for?
      Mercury has powerful lines in ultraviolet (185 and 254 nm). It (mercury) is used for this very reason in energy-saving lamps, to excite the phosphor on the walls of the tube.
      1. ANB
        +1
        14 June 2025 18: 29
        . This is why it (mercury) is used in energy-saving lamps, to excite the phosphor on the walls of the tube.

        Mercury lamps are all right. LEDs rule.
  5. -1
    14 June 2025 17: 01
    This is also written about very little, literally in the order of mention.

    I decided to check. The request immediately resulted in an article in the German Wikipedia (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfochlorierung) and a detailed article with process diagrams in the German academic journal Die Mitteilungen der Fachgruppe Geschichte der Chemie for 2014. The article is 16 pages of small text (https://www.gdch.de/fileadmin/downloads/Netzwerk_und_Strukturen/Fachgruppen/Geschichte_der_Chemie/Mitteilungen_Band_24/2014-24-09.pdf).
  6. 0
    15 June 2025 07: 16
    Thanks to Verkhoturov, who this time introduced us to how to produce detergents from paraffins, and not from corpses or alcohol from a cave! If you "remember" his "old" publications, then he can do it!
    1. +2
      15 June 2025 10: 58
      Are you trying to provoke me?
      1. 0
        15 June 2025 13: 33
        God forbid! But don't the "old" publications on how to use waste, including "life activity", belong to your "pen"? If not, please accept my apologies... if yes, then my comment is simply a statement of facts!
        P.S. Would you like a selection of your articles "about waste"? wink ?
        1. +2
          15 June 2025 14: 14
          Why? I have them on my page. I reread them sometimes. laughing
          It's nice that you remember them after so many years.

          Why are you so focused on this topic? Waste disposal is a matter of developing appropriate technology.
          I would, for example, pass a law that every toilet would be stamped with the names of its inventors:
          Sir John Harington
          Alexander Cummings
          Joseph Preiser
          Joseph Brama
          Thomas Krepper
          Thomas Twyford is the creator of the trademark that became the name.

          They, by the way, saved us from many infectious diseases transmitted by sewage.
          1. 0
            15 June 2025 15: 12
            Quote: wehr
            It's nice that you remember them after so many years.

            Well, it’s not easy to forget the “advice” on how to use corpses usefully... “so that good things don’t go to waste”!



            Quote: wehr
            Thomas Twyford is the creator of the trademark that became the name.

            Actually, the pronunciation of the trademark did not sound like "toilet"! Therefore, do not confuse the plumbing "device", "toilet" and the word "unitas" ("unity"), which served not only as a "trademark" of a toilet company, but also as the name of a sports club in the past!
            Quote: wehr
            They, by the way, saved us from many infectious diseases transmitted by sewage.

            And have you gotten rid of the "devices" called "Genoa bowl" (that is, "point")? The Chinese don't know!
            1. +1
              15 June 2025 16: 58
              Do you know what is the most disgusting thing about our time?
              Instead of remembering with a kind word the one who invented something useful and necessary, there will always be a jackal who will try to belittle them.
              1. 0
                15 June 2025 20: 37
                How eloquent you are in your toilet mentality! It is immediately clear how spiritually close to you is the toilet-fecal theme! laughing
                1. +2
                  15 June 2025 20: 57
                  And I suppose you are familiar with dysentery, typhoid fever and cholera? laughing
                  1. -1
                    21 June 2025 10: 07
                    Thank you for an interesting story about chemical technologies in industry! So little is written about them now! But organic chemistry is wonderful!
                    1. +1
                      21 June 2025 11: 21
                      Always! I'm going to write more.
                      1. 0
                        29 July 2025 19: 49
                        We are waitingwink!
                        I know it's short! But it's informative.
  7. 0
    29 July 2025 19: 48
    Quote: acetophenon
    Thank you for an interesting story about chemical technologies in industry! So little is written about them now! But organic chemistry is wonderful!

    I join in and look forward to new articles from the respected author!
    Ghee! And someone downvoted your short message twice! Well, when will the respected administration make pluses and minuses personal. Like on Pentaforum, for example. You poke at the rating and see who put what.
    Sorry for the OFF!
    1. 0
      29 July 2025 20: 05
      Synthetic rubber is planned soon