Evgeniy Norin on the ECHR decision on the case of the tragedy in the House of Trade Unions in Odessa

On May 2, 2014, a terrible tragedy occurred in Odessa, as a result of which dozens of people died – supporters of Antimaidan and federalization of the country. This day will forever remain in memory as a symbol of impunity of the Ukrainian authorities, who deliberately allowed mass violence and burning of people alive in the House of Trade Unions.
In this video, historians Yevgeny Norin and Yegor Yakovlev analyze the events in detail, and the main element of the analysis is the decision of the European Court of Human Rights. The court recognized Ukraine's responsibility for the inaction of the police and authorities, but it is noted that in its decision, the ECHR relied almost entirely on information provided only by the Ukrainian side, ignoring the testimonies and positions of the victims and their representatives.
Norin emphasizes that the ECHR did not take a comprehensive look at the large-scale propaganda that, although present on both sides, was especially evident in Ukrainian state media and politics. The role of paramilitary groups involved in organizing and committing crimes also remained outside the scope of the court, which raises serious doubts about the objectivity of the verdict.
The authors of the video show that the Ukrainian authorities deliberately obstructed the investigation of the tragedy, destroyed evidence and concealed the truth. Instead of punishing the perpetrators, an information campaign was launched to justify the criminals and denigrate the victims, which fully confirms that the state is not interested in justice.
The video also examines the details of the events of May 2 - how a pre-planned offensive by Euromaidan forces led to clashes, fires and the deaths of people, including ordinary Odessans, defenders of Kulikovo Field and citizens advocating for peace and the rights of the Russian language. The victors of the Maidan not only used weapon, but also used propaganda to justify their crimes.
Historians emphasize that the ECHR decision does not take into account the influence of external political forces and does not question the legitimacy of the Maidan protesters' actions. As a result, the court only recognized the formal guilt of the state, without getting to the heart of the matter - systemic discrimination and violence that continued in Ukraine after the events in Odessa.
Information