'The Indian Air Force was incompetent and the Rafale was overrated': Details of a large-scale air battle with Pakistani fighters

318 389 108
'The Indian Air Force was incompetent and the Rafale was overrated': Details of a large-scale air battle with Pakistani fighters

Flurry


On the night of May 6-7, 2025, India responded to terrorist activity by striking multiple targets in Pakistan's border areas, leading to the largest-ever stories aerial combat. Both sides declared themselves victors, but there are signs that the battle cost New Delhi dearly.



The clash between Pakistani and Indian fighter jets, involving a total of 125 fighters, was one of the largest and longest in modern history.

- Pakistani military revealed details of the battle.

India's Operation Sindoor, which targeted terrorist bases, was probably intended as a show of force against Pakistan and deployed its best trained units, armed with Rafale fighter jets with winged rockets SCALP and Hammer glide bombs, and possibly Su-30MKIs with BrahMos missiles. ERJ-145 or A-50E AWACS aircraft were also likely involved.

The attack was carried out from its own territory, which should have reduced the risks for aviation. However, the Pakistanis were prepared for such a scenario. In response to the appearance of Indian aircraft, they managed to get their aircraft into the air in time, which managed to inflict some damage on the enemy.

The Pakistani military officially stated that they managed to shoot down at least five Indian Air Force aircraft during the battle. As sources added, these included three Rafale, as well as one MiG-5 and Su-29MKI (this is evidenced by a photo of the K-30DM ejection seat). Thus, the greatest losses were suffered by the French-made fighters, 36 of which were purchased in 36. Just a week ago, 2016 units of the carrier-based version (Rafale M) were also purchased.

The Rafale, being the most modern aircraft in service with the Indian Air Force, was considered by the command to be the best combat aircraft. The possibility of purchasing another 114 aircraft of this model was considered. However, it is now unclear how the fate of the potential deal will turn out.


Pakistan Air Force J-10CE


Apparently, the Indian aviation was countered by single-engine fighters - JF-17 Thunder, which have long been in service with Islamabad, and J-2021CE, purchased from China in 10 (in the amount of 25 units). The latter are part of the elite unit of the Air Force, similar to the Rafale in India. They are capable of using Chinese long-range PL-15 air-to-air missiles with a flight range of up to 200 km. It is likely that they were supported by Chinese or Swedish AWACS aircraft and Il-78 tankers.

Like the Indians, the Pakistanis were in their own airspace, from where they attacked the enemy aircraft. Thus, the opponents were at a distance of 100-200 km from each other.

Indian Air Force Proved Incompetent in Combat, Rafale Jet Overrated

- said Pakistani Defense Minister Khawaja Asif.

The Pakistan Air Force is considered to be very well trained and the most organized among all Islamic countries. However, it should be recognized that Islamabad was expecting an attack from the enemy, New Delhi even announced it in advance. Therefore, the Air Force simply had to be ready to repel an attack.

For example, the JF-17 and J-10CE, receiving information from AWACS aircraft, could lie in wait for the enemy at low altitude, near the ground, while the Indians reached the launch altitude of cruise missiles.

However, in any case, this large-scale battle showed that the Rafale is far from a flawless machine, and Chinese aircraft and missiles are capable of effective interception.

108 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    9 May 2025 01: 01
    The clash between Pakistani and Indian fighter jets, involving a total of 125 fighters, was one of the largest and longest in modern history.

    - Pakistani military revealed details of the battle.

    Probably the Pakistanis had two fighters, and the Indians had one hundred and twenty-three, the Pakistanis would have shot many more of them if they had taken off from the airfield, but they were shooting straight from the hangar. Of course, the Indians haven't been very successful in military affairs in recent years, but here the degree of bragging exceeds all reasonable limits
    1. +22
      9 May 2025 03: 35
      That's true! If the Indians had said that, we could have joked about their legendary films, where the main characters defeat a crowd of enemies... with a glance laughing Although, maybe they also film something like this in Pakistan, who knows.

      Well, but seriously:
      1) In fact, we know little about the battle. And its outcome could have been influenced by a huge number of factors.
      2) The author of the article mentioned Chinese aircraft, but forgot to mention that the Pakistan Air Force also has F-16s and Mirages.
      3) "Never do they lie so much as during war, after hunting and before elections."
      1. 0
        9 May 2025 13: 53
        Quote: Infinity
        but forgot to mention that Pakistan Air Force also has F-16s and Mirages

        They have, but you have to look at what kind of missiles they have.
    2. +6
      9 May 2025 10: 58
      It is necessary to understand that the Chinese supplied the Pak with intelligence information, including satellite information. China has a huge group of reconnaissance satellites. So it turned out that the Pak took out the Indians "dry". Now, it will be very difficult to explain to the toad-eaters why their "Rafales" are so expensive.
      1. +1
        9 May 2025 17: 53
        I think there is not very complex intelligence information there, probably the Indians were openly preparing strikes, maybe even informed various foreign military attaches, the Pakistanis deployed fighters and fired a salvo. And the Indians probably did not expect that they would be shot at. You read about how the Indians fought 70-50 years ago, how they sneered at the Pakistanis, something definitely broke in their military leadership, instead of the Beetles, some Kisels came. And the Pakistanis, on the contrary, learned to fight
        1. +2
          9 May 2025 18: 45
          Who did the Pakistanis fight besides the Indians? The Pashtuns and the Baluchis - that's not the enemy. I think the Chinese planned and organized the preparation, and the Pakistanis implemented it. I must admit - they implemented it well.
          1. +1
            9 May 2025 20: 01
            And who did the Chinese fight with? With sticks against the Indians? The Pakistanis are simply militarized, their army has political weight, the country is in a perpetual crisis, the country somehow stays in shape.
            1. +3
              9 May 2025 20: 17
              The Chinese are not at war with anyone yet. No militarization will replace the economy, the Pak is saved by the fact that they have China and the Gulf monarchies behind them.
              1. +1
                9 May 2025 23: 46
                The Chinese haven't been at war with anyone for a hundred years, but in planning military operations they are better than the Pakistanis, who are constantly fighting guerrillas?
                Quote: TermNachTER
                No militarization will replace the economy, what saves the pack is that

                that they make better use of the few resources they have, while the Indians are extremely stupid
                Quote: TermNachTER
                The Pak is saved by the fact that they have China and the Gulf monarchies behind them

                How does it save? A poor country, from crisis to crisis. Well, at least their military can do something in the country
                1. 0
                  10 May 2025 10: 45
                  This is what saves them - the Gulf monarchies give money, and China - weapons and intelligence. The Pakis won the first round practically "dry". Although information appeared that the Indians shot down a Paki F-16 and even captured the pilot.
                  1. 0
                    10 May 2025 22: 02
                    Quote: TermNachTER
                    Gulf monarchies give money

                    for a country of two hundred million people, this is just handouts, Egypt received an order of magnitude more. Pakistan almost burst because it had to pay back a loan of 7 billion. They give money to Israel or Ukraine, but here, if you consider that all this is on the sponsors' money, then they worked for a thousand percent. In the eighties, Pakistan was generally sponsored by the Japanese
                    Quote: TermNachTER
                    China - Weapons and Intelligence

                    China sells weapons. And the Indians themselves will burn the intelligence data, it seems to me, without any nanotechnology. Now if the Pakistanis had snagged some new stealth corvette or a submarine, then one could be surprised at their foresight, but here there are no serious reasons to decide that they themselves could not have seen the Indian planes on radar
                  2. 0
                    11 May 2025 19: 52
                    Oh, there were Indians involved too? And which ones, North American ones apparently?
                    Or did Nikolai confuse Indians with Native Americans?
                    1. 0
                      11 May 2025 20: 11
                      Indians are Indians even in Africa)))
          2. 0
            Yesterday, 08: 21
            How to use fighters at maximum modes, Pakistanis were trained by the USA, this was back in the days when the Pakistan Air Force flew J6! Everything remained in the regulations and therefore the pilots still have good qualifications. And Pakistan and India are constantly gaining experience in air warfare. If everything really turned out as it was written, then I think the Indians were not ready for a counter attack, did not expect an air battle, Pakistani intelligence was at its best.
        2. +3
          9 May 2025 19: 34
          the situation reminds me of the last war (or the last one) for Karabakh (now Artsan), where Azerbaijan, with the support of Turkey, fought dryly against Armenia... the same situation when the Armenians were resting on their laurels, but Azerbaijanis invested and... and yes, the issue of support of the ISS is a priority... what's the point if you have avionics at the level of ELS, there is no target designation and you fight blind... by the way, in a similar situation, our Aerospace Forces in the event of a confrontation not with a handful of F-16s, but with all NATO aviation with support in information and target designation... it would be painful... and even super-maneuverability will not save you from a missile that has flown in from afar when your SPO is silent and there is nothing on the radar...
          1. 0
            9 May 2025 20: 06
            The situation is completely different - the military budget of Azerbaijan was comparable to the entire budget of Armenia. Whereas the military budget of India is almost an order of magnitude larger than the military budget of Pakistan. I think in India the military profession is simply not very popular, because the blockheads manage as best they can, all the smart ones went into business or IT
            1. +1
              9 May 2025 22: 09
              ..well, just like in ancient China..they don't make nails from good iron...they don't make warriors from good China...well, and from Europe...whoever doesn't want to feed THEIR army...will feed someone else's..
              and yes..at one time they were in favor of Indo-Soviet friendship but..as practice has shown..gypsies are gypsies and they are..
              1. 0
                10 May 2025 08: 46
                Good point about the gypsies. They say they bought 60 billion worth of everything in the Russian Federation, even metal, gave their own money in return, they don't sell anything with this money, sanctions, they say.
                They offer to invest in their economy...
          2. +1
            10 May 2025 17: 02
            and even super maneuverability won't save you from a missile that flies in from afar


            It will save you. The Su-35 can make a "blich" turn and reduce speed to zero while monitoring the approaching missile. At the right moment, turn on the electronic warfare and throw out a dozen "decoys" with foil. And try to shoot one of those down. But of course, this is in conditions when the missile is long-range with its own weak radar for guidance and there is time to maneuver.
      2. -3
        10 May 2025 01: 26
        Quote: TermNachTER
        China has a huge group of reconnaissance satellites. So it turned out that the Pakis took out the Indians "dry". Now, it will be very difficult to explain to the toad-eaters why their "Rafales" are so expensive.

        The price of a product is determined by its performance characteristics and the market. If there is demand for Rafale, then the price is adequate. If the Indians considered their Rafale to be a galactic starship, invisible to radar and invulnerable to weapons, and went into enemy territory that was waiting for them there, the French and their Rafale are not to blame. As far as we know, the Indians' mission was to destroy Pakistan's radar and air defense positions. And here there are many questions about the competence of the Indian General Staff, how much they took everything into account, including the volume of Chinese aid to Pakistan.
        1. +1
          10 May 2025 10: 48
          Is the price of over 100 million euros per piece adequate? And now it turns out that the super-litac is not quite super. One "Rafale" - two Su-35, and considering that the "Sushi" could be assembled from machine kits in India, it is even cheaper.
          1. 0
            10 May 2025 23: 11
            Nothing was found out there, why the hell did something come out? Do you know the details of the battles, what, how and why happened?
            1. 0
              11 May 2025 00: 15
              We don't know Aoka, but we saw the wreckage of at least one "Rafale". I'll note, toad-eaters, they position this plane as super-duper technological, the newest, but it turns out that this is very much not true.
              1. 0
                11 May 2025 12: 23
                What's wrong? They position it as super-duper technological, not as unshootable. Or do you think Rafael is not a technologically advanced aircraft?
                1. 0
                  11 May 2025 12: 49
                  In my understanding, a super is an aircraft that is difficult to shoot down, and if it is possible, then with some new SAM or air-to-air missile. In this case, we have the newest European airplane shot down by backward Chinese technology. The Indians (toad-eaters) talk about the fact that
                  instead of backward Russian technology, the newest super-planes were purchased (for absolutely crazy money) - they don't look serious. For me, the only question is - did the Indian generals who lobbied for the purchase of "Rafales" initially understand that this was mostly advertising or that the toad-eaters simply deceived them like suckers. Then, yes - it's doubly offensive)))
                  1. 0
                    12 May 2025 02: 44
                    1) And if a mediocre pilot sits at the controls of a super-duper plane, will this mean that the plane is bad?
                    2) I don’t think it’s appropriate to appeal to categories such as someone “cheating” someone; I think it’s more appropriate that someone got a kickback from this.
                    1. 0
                      12 May 2025 09: 42
                      I don't think the Indians sent yesterday's college graduates to war - there's still plenty to choose from, especially for the "Rafale". You could write a book about how weapons manufacturers "cheat" customers - just look at the "Lockheed".
    3. -2
      10 May 2025 11: 46
      Just watch them dance with tambourines and everything will fall into place. They are not spinning joysticks on vimanas...
    4. +1
      11 May 2025 12: 21
      What's the boast? They claimed 5 downed planes, not 50 or 100...or 95% of the enemy destroyed.
  2. +5
    9 May 2025 01: 05
    Reasoning like this is like drawing far-reaching conclusions from the incident with the shooting down of an F-117 during the Yugoslav war. That is, it is extremely incorrect. We do not know the initial data - but in fact, a direct missile hit can, of course, shoot down any plane. The question is in the nuances - without this, the article is nothing more than a "buy Russian" propaganda piece.
    IMHO, specifically for such cases, the Indians definitely did not have enough squadrons of "stealth" aircraft, because this kind of use is a task for "strategists" or for "stealth" aircraft.
  3. +1
    9 May 2025 01: 15
    they got excited, but that's not certain
  4. +13
    9 May 2025 01: 30
    Yes, a very interesting battle. It is clear that both sides are lying, and that 125 fighters is too many, perhaps more than 100 aircraft took to the air, including AWACS aircraft, etc.
    For now, it can be said with certainty that Chinese dozens with long-range missiles managed to inflict some damage on the Indian Air Force, but we will find out the extent of it later.
    Well, the fact that the Rafale in the strike version with cruise missiles on the external suspension can be shot down is not news. By the way, according to other sources, among the shot down were Mirage-2000 and Jaguar, and not MiG-29, which is quite logical. MiG-29 is not very suitable for strikes on the ground. Well, we know nothing about the losses of the Pakistani Air Force.
    1. +1
      9 May 2025 01: 47
      Quote: Belisarius
      Well, we don’t know anything about the losses of the Pakistan Air Force.

      Indians raised planes to attack ground targets
  5. +3
    9 May 2025 01: 31
    Well, if in exchange the Indians shot down 20 Pakistani planes, then it seems like nothing.
    The information is only from one side.
    By the way, the fact that each fired from their own territory, and the downed Indian plane fell on Pakistani territory, also raises suspicion.
    Did you move it overnight?
    And the pilot's body too?
    Everything is murky and bullshit.
    1. +8
      9 May 2025 01: 47
      Yes, of course, it's a bit of a mess there. Well, they described it as if it were air battles in Kuban in 1943. Knowing the Indians and the Pak, everything had to be divided by 100. That's at least
    2. -5
      9 May 2025 02: 28
      不对,PL15的射程足以让印度飞机在本国空域内被击落,而且你可以在马丁贝克的官No, The PL7787's range is sufficient to shoot down an Indian aircraft in national airspace, and you can view three gust fighter kills on Martin Baker's official website with numbers 7786, 7785, 15.
      1. +6
        9 May 2025 07: 49
        https://martin-baker.com/ejection-notices/
        7787 - no information
        7786 - 20/04/2025 – Awaiting details…
        That is, the date of the disaster does not coincide with the date of the military operation.
        7785 - no information
        7784 - On the 15th April 2025, a Dassault Mirage V ROSE crashed in Ratta Tibba, Pakistan, after a reported technical malfunction.
        Both pilots successfully ejected using the Martin-Baker PRM4 seat.

        That is, 7785 has an April date.
        1. 0
          9 May 2025 10: 40
          没错,你是对的。yes,you are right。
  6. +3
    9 May 2025 01: 46
    Indian Air Force 'Incompetent', Rafale 'Overrated': Details of Large-Scale Air Battle with Pakistani Fighters

    Param param pam.... Piu. Funny stories from Yeralash magazine
  7. 0
    9 May 2025 01: 48
    Well, now look, and MiGs with complex wings will again fit into the cargo elevators of aircraft carriers, like daddy into mommy.
  8. +20
    9 May 2025 02: 07
    An F-16 fighter jet of the Pakistan Air Force was shot down by Indian ground-based air defense systems, Indian television channel NDTV reported, citing sources.
    Indian media reports that the pilot of the downed Pakistan Air Force fighter jet has been captured.

    Exactly 80 years ago, on the night of May 8-9 at 01:01 Moscow time, the act of unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany came into force. Happy Great Victory Day!
    1. +10
      9 May 2025 02: 41
      The Americans do not allow Pakistan to use the F16 in the Indian war, which is clearly wrong.

      Congratulations to the great anti-fascists! Long live!
      1. +4
        9 May 2025 03: 47
        Well, then why buy it if they "don't allow" you to use it? Weapons are bought for war.
        1. +3
          9 May 2025 03: 53
          Since Pakistani F - 16 were acquired in the last century, they had no other choice until China appeared.
          1. +3
            9 May 2025 09: 45
            The Indians are certainly super-competent bastards, but you want to say that China sells weapons to a country that supports international Islamic terrorism at all levels, including its leadership, while China mercilessly destroys Uyghur Islamic terrorism at home - is this a 2nd standard policy in Chinese style? We also need to remember that China sold Soviet weapons it produced to Afghan terrorist groups that were opposing Soviet internationalist soldiers. Therefore, we need to keep our ears open with China. In general, Russia has 3 allies - the Army, the Navy and the People.
            1. +1
              9 May 2025 10: 24
              显然,俄罗斯对伊斯兰教更宽容,你们甚至允许伊斯兰教在俄罗斯建立单独的政权,他们只Obviously, that Russia is a more tolerant party towards Islam, and you even allow Islam to establish separate regimes in Russia, and their loyalty is only to the personal Russian leader, and not to Russia as a country, so you have no right to blame China.
              1. +6
                9 May 2025 11: 16
                Quote: JiaranDiana
                It is obvious that Russia is the more tolerant side towards Islam.

                There are about a hundred mosques in Beijing, less than 8 in Moscow. However, in recent years they have not allowed mosques to be built in Beijing. In Russia, representatives of the Muslim community are often more active in the confrontation with Ukrainian Nazis than the Slavs. The fact that Crimea returned to Russia almost bloodlessly and all Crimean Tatar militant organizations actually fell apart within 2 days or abandoned active open struggle is largely due to the Chechen special forces. In the PRC, Islam began to spread strongly among previously non-Muslim peoples, for example in Manchuria. Both the Russians and the Chinese face similar problems, but often solve them differently, achieving completely different things.
            2. -12
              9 May 2025 10: 33
              苏联在阿富汗的行动背弃了马克思列宁共产主义精神,对一个Actions The Soviet Union in Afghanistan rejected the Marxist-Leninist communist spirit and brazenly attacked the socialist regime, and you are traitors.
              1. +9
                9 May 2025 10: 51
                You sing well, subtly, in an oriental way. But you also lie in an oriental way. In 1979, communist China attacked communist Vietnam, occupying three northern provinces. Vietnam was an ally of the USSR, unlike pro-American China at the time. The USSR, as an ally, supplied its weapons to Vietnam. In addition, the USSR relocated its aviation to Mongolia, brought the Pacific Fleet to combat readiness, and concentrated Soviet troops on the border with China. This was done to demonstrate the unacceptability of China's aggression against Vietnam. Vietnamese troops, seasoned in the war with the United States, defeated the invading Chinese troops with the help of Soviet weapons. Therefore, China's supply of weapons (by the way, Soviet, stupidly transferred to China for production) to Afghanistan was an act of petty Chinese revenge, and socialism has nothing to do with it - it has never been in Afghanistan, there are still tribal relations there.
                1. -2
                  9 May 2025 11: 18
                  China, at the request of the Red Cambodian government, forced Vietnam to abandon the invasion, and Vietnam was the first to start aggression!
                  The People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan is a socialist regime.

                  根据阿方副官的回忆了解到,阿明命令他通知苏联军事顾问有人对总统官邸发动进攻,并说: “苏联人会帮助我们的。”副官报告说:“进攻的是苏联人”,这番话使阿明失去了自我控制,他抓起烟灰缸朝副官扔过去,并喊道:“你扯谎,这不可能!”然后试图亲自给总参谋长挂电话。通讯已经中断了。阿明自言自语道:“这是我曾经猜疑过的,看来一切都是真的”。From From the memoirs of the adjutant of Albania it became known that Amin ordered him to notify the Soviet military adviser about the attack on the presidential residence and said: "The Soviet people will help us." The adjutant reported: "The Soviet people are advancing," these words brought Amin out of self-control, he grabbed an ashtray and threw it towards the adjutant, shouting: "You're lying, this is impossible!" and tried to personally hang up the phone to the Chief of the General Staff. The connection was lost. Amin says to himself: "This is what I once suspected, and it seems that everything is true."
                  1. SSR
                    +2
                    9 May 2025 11: 52
                    Quote: JiaranDiana
                    The adjutant reported: “The Soviet people are advancing,” these words brought Amin out of self-control,

                    I read a book a long time ago about the storming of Amin's palace, and in this whole story, the ears of the Anglo-Saxons can be seen, who carried out successful disinformation and the leadership of the USSR believed that the Anglo-Saxons were entering there.
                  2. +7
                    9 May 2025 12: 31
                    I do not want to develop the topic of Russian-Chinese discord. Russia and China currently have good relations and common goals and threats. But I would not rush to classify China as Russia's "allies". Russia's only ally so far is the DPRK and maybe Belarus to a small extent. Iran is also a rather "murky" state with a strong Islamist component. And China is a cunning, eastern player that Russia should not rely on, because China, even communist, has shown itself in history from a different, unflattering side. I would be glad to be wrong.
                    1. -3
                      9 May 2025 12: 41
                      这样就足够了,马克思教导我们:“真理是客观的,不是主观的;它的存在不This enough, and Marx teaches us: “Truth is objective, not subjective; its existence depends not on the consciousness and faith of people, but on the existence of consciousness and faith.”
                      1. 0
                        9 May 2025 13: 01
                        Marx and Engels are not authorities at all. They are figures in the field of social sciences. And social sciences are not natural sciences (physics, chemistry). Social sciences do not have clear and permanently defined laws. Everything is vague and changeable there. In addition, Marx was a notorious Russophobe. I do not know how Marx felt about the Chinese, but I think the same as all the other Europeans who "hooked" China on opium and then organized the Opium Wars. Or like the recently deceased Pope, who, after communicating with the wives of Ukrainian fascists, said that "Russian troops are committing terrible atrocities in Ukraine, but not Russian, Christian soldiers, but wild, Asian Buryats." If he spoke about the Buryats (Mongols) in this way, then you understand that his attitude to other Asian peoples with a different eye shape than the Europeans is about the same.
                      2. +1
                        9 May 2025 22: 49
                        Looks like you haven't read "Starship Troopers" by Robert Heinlein )))
                      3. 0
                        10 May 2025 23: 27
                        Engels was a notorious Russophobe, and Marx simply sang along with him in this...
                  3. +3
                    9 May 2025 13: 59
                    Quote: JiaranDiana
                    The People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan is a socialist regime.

                    You can call the regime whatever you want, but wars don’t start because of that.
                2. The comment was deleted.
                3. -3
                  9 May 2025 11: 26
                  Quote: MichIs
                  Vietnamese troops, hardened in the war with the United States, defeated the invading Chinese troops with the help of Soviet weapons.

                  The Chinese demonstrated their superiority in the wars with Vietnam. Only one Vietnamese division did not see combat and was not badly battered. To the surprise of observers, the Chinese army, which had not seen combat since the Korean War, used artillery and MLRS better. The Chinese used about 15 tons of shells during the storming of Lang Son. In the naval war, the Chinese demonstrated the superiority of their fleet both against South Vietnam and against the united socialist. The USSR poorly supported its Vietnamese ally during the aggression of the PRC. By the way, many Chinese in the PRC believe that Vietnam attacked China and the war was not on Vietnamese territory but on Chinese territory. Chinese women are often shocked after their relatives who took part in the invasion of Vietnam tell them what really happened in that war.
                  1. +3
                    9 May 2025 11: 52
                    What superiority, if there were 250-300_000 regular Chinese troops (and a group of 600_000 on the border), and they were opposed by 100_000 border guards and militias (parts of the regular Vietnamese army almost did not participate, and the destruction of the regular Vietnamese army was one of the goals of the Chinese invasion). Combat losses on both sides were approximately 20_000. In addition, about 100_000 peaceful Vietnamese were destroyed by Chinese cutthroats, as did the Nazis and Japanese militarists (they did not go far behind them). China did not achieve its goals and was forced to retreat from Vietnam. The war showed the archaism of the Chinese army. After the war, reforms began in the Chinese Army. By the way, there was practically no war at sea.
                    1. +4
                      9 May 2025 12: 16
                      Quote: MichIs
                      By the way, there was practically no war at sea.
                      There were several naval wars between China and South Vietnam. Vietnam lost many islands in these wars.
                      Quote: MichIs
                      and they were opposed by 100 border guards and militias (regular Vietnamese army units hardly participated

                      At the end of the war, Vietnam transferred 4 of its best divisions from Kampuchea. The Chinese defeated 3. At the end of the conflict, the Chinese retreated to the heights in anticipation of a Vietnamese counteroffensive with the intention of testing their troops in defense. The Vietnamese did not storm the Chinese positions. For political reasons, China left Vietnamese territory. From a strategic point of view, the defiant support of the Huaqiao in Southeast Asia and the Chinese invasion of Vietnam have an extremely negative impact on China, making all of Southeast Asia an enemy of China. In addition, China invaded India and Damansky Island. India could have been an economic ally of China, but has become an enemy. Although China and India have common problems - Muslim extremism and separatism. But China supplies weapons to Pakistan, passing on its military secrets to its future Muslim enemies.
                      1. +2
                        9 May 2025 12: 25
                        The point is that only a few of the best units were transferred to repel the aggression - and this is logical when there was an emergency. But the majority of the Vietnamese army units did not participate in the war for various reasons. The recall of units from Kampuchea did not affect Vietnam's destruction of the cannibalistic pro-Chinese Khmer Rouge regime, which killed millions of its fellow citizens in its small country.
              2. 0
                9 May 2025 16: 24
                Quote: JiaranDiana
                苏联在阿富汗的行动背弃了马克思列宁共产主义精神,对一个Actions The Soviet Union in Afghanistan rejected the Marxist-Leninist communist spirit and brazenly attacked the socialist regime, and you are traitors.

                hi, do you remember anything else from earlier?
                for example the Finnish War 1939-1940,
                several partitions of Poland
                conquest of Novgorod, Tver
                1. 0
                  10 May 2025 03: 17
                  我的积分已经是-500分了,My score is already 500, and if someone doesn’t like it when I'm telling the truth, I'll just shut up.
                  1. +2
                    10 May 2025 17: 23
                    Don't be offended by the locals. We don't teach Chinese history in school. Few people know about the centuries-old confrontation between China and Vietnam.
                    But the Chinese are great. They created a huge, powerful state. The Jurchens, Khitans, and Dzungars have disappeared somewhere in history. But the Chinese remain.
                    The Vietnamese, in turn, won the right to be called a nation that cannot be broken. Including after the war of 1979. And you can dig into the reasons for a long time. They are always there.
              3. 0
                10 May 2025 12: 01
                ... you have no right to blame China.

                ... you are traitors.

                1) it is not for you to judge what we have a right to;
                2) China, as a civilization, exists thanks to Russia and its conciliarity of all religions; and Russia, as a civilization, cannot be broken as long as China-civilization exists. You and I are mutually connected amulets and powerful supports, both in history and in the future;
                3) there is no point in now accusing Russian people of some kind of “betrayal” of Marxist-Leninist ideology, since this ideology itself is very far removed from the unshakable universal moral norms and love for humanity, if one studies these works without abbreviations and without censorship;
                4) the united communist party of Afghanistan was split, with the help of Anglo-Saxon intrigues, and its legitimate leader was revolutionary (in 1978) removed, and power was seized by a radical ruler with feudal views on the state structure of Afghanistan, for which he was overthrown, with the goal of preserving precisely the "communist spirit". It is sad that China followed the lead of the Anglo-Saxons in this confrontation, and together they could have built much more in Afghanistan than the USSR alone;
                5) What are you talking about: "...allowing Islam to establish separate regimes in Russia..."? Are you sure you are from China? Or are you writing from the ocean?
                1. +1
                  11 May 2025 02: 51
                  1. XNUMX. Did I suddenly rush into the crowd and scream? Do I look like a psychopath?
                  2.-4. I don't want to argue about anything anymore, I'm too tired.
                  5. Chechen the republic, in my opinion, still has too many rights and even has a separate Chechen army, which is unacceptable for the Soviet Red Army and the People's Liberation Army of China.
              4. 0
                10 May 2025 17: 10
                Actually, the USSR was defending the socialist regime in Afghanistan. That's why it went there. And then suddenly "rejected the Marxist-Leninist spirit" and in general "traitors".
            3. 0
              9 May 2025 14: 11
              Russia has 3 allies - the Army, the Navy and the People.
              Let me correct this a little: army, navy and strategic missile forces.
              1. 0
                10 May 2025 23: 34
                Yeah, the people of Russia don't give a shit about Russia's officials, how can I put it mildly...
        2. +1
          9 May 2025 08: 02
          Pakistani F-16s have outdated avionics, including radar, and the US does not want to upgrade them. In addition, long-range missiles are also needed, and the AIM-120 AMRAAM is supplied by the Americans only to loyal allies such as NATO, Japan, etc. In addition, the AIM-120 is inferior in range to the PL-15, and judging by the Reuters report that the air combat distance sometimes exceeded 160 km, China supplied Pakistan with at least several PL-15 missiles, not the cut-down export version with a range of 145 km, but those used by the Chinese Air Force with a range of 300 km.
          Therefore, Pakistan replaced the F-16 with light fighters JF-17, which are significantly inferior in performance characteristics to American fighters, but have modern Chinese avionics and missiles. Well, China has strengthened the Pakistan Air Force J-10C and plans to transfer J-35 to equalize them with the power of the Indian Air Force.
        3. -1
          9 May 2025 09: 28
          Nuclear weapons are purchased for some reason. Even though no one fights with them.
        4. 0
          9 May 2025 11: 00
          Here's the answer when you buy a weapon from a very dodgy partner)))
      2. 0
        11 May 2025 20: 13
        Apparently Pakistan didn't pay enough (enough?) for the F-16s, so the US and India are prohibiting them from using them in the war?
  9. +1
    9 May 2025 03: 47
    'The Indian Air Force was incompetent and the Rafale was overrated': Details of a large-scale air battle with Pakistani fighters

    It was not a bobbin ...
  10. -4
    9 May 2025 04: 33
    Indian Air Force Proved Incompetent, Rafale Jet Overrated

    Dancing with a tambourine didn't help...
    It's sad, though..
    And every time the Indians buy weapons from us, including aircraft, there is always a bargaining over buying as cheaply as possible and the right to produce in their own country under license.
    The results we now see are that Pakistan was wiser in purchasing the latest aircraft from its eternal enemy/rival China than the Indians were in purchasing from the frogs. And at the same time, they purchased the outdated Rafale model at an inflated price per unit.
    1. +5
      9 May 2025 05: 19
      Pakistan has been buying from China since the 1970s, actually. Previously, these were copies and upgrades of MiGs (for example, the MiG-19), now, probably, others as well.
  11. -1
    9 May 2025 05: 49
    A typical picture for a country that switched from Soviet to Western technology. And the key word in this situation is "logistics". It's not enough to buy equipment, you need to service it. And this is in addition to pilots, trained technical personnel. And this is time and money. Pilots, this is also a flight school with its experience and traditions. Soviet equipment was trained in the USSR, whose school was the best in the world. Everyone was afraid of the pilots trained by the union. Well, and so on. Rafale is only good against the aviation of the 60s and has never fought in serious brawls with classmates. And somehow I have not heard any enthusiasm about the French piloting school.
  12. +1
    9 May 2025 05: 53
    I wonder if the Indians shot down even one Pakistani fighter or not?
    1. +8
      9 May 2025 07: 53
      If they had shot it down or there was such a possibility, the Indian media would have already trumpeted about it.
  13. +3
    9 May 2025 07: 03
    Quote: poquello
    Quote: Belisarius
    Well, we don’t know anything about the losses of the Pakistan Air Force.

    Indians raised planes to attack ground targets

    In such operations there must be cover aircraft, which is why they are accused of incompetence.
    1. P
      +3
      9 May 2025 13: 42
      if the difference in launch range with the enemy is 100+ km, cover/don't cover it will still be crap
  14. 0
    9 May 2025 07: 53
    It's strange that the major aircraft manufacturers don't make a big deal about this. Especially about the Rafale.
  15. BAI
    +4
    9 May 2025 08: 40
    showed that the Rafale is far from a flawless machine, and that Chinese aircraft and missiles are capable of effective interception

    The same can be said about Russian planes.
    How many Chinese were shot down?
    1. -1
      9 May 2025 09: 49
      Our planes' gaskets turned out to be completely useless - they can only eat sweet potatoes.
  16. +2
    9 May 2025 08: 57
    One thing is clear - the Indian Air Force raid was foiled. And it is not an attack by fighters when they try to stay at a distance, in their own airspace²
  17. +3
    9 May 2025 09: 29
    It appears that the Indians intended to strike at ground bases in Pakistan, but were ambushed by the Pakistanis, who were already waiting for them.
  18. 0
    9 May 2025 09: 50
    If
    Like the Indians, the Pakistanis were in their own airspace from where they attacked enemy aircraft.

    then what does it have to do with it
    photo of the K-36DM ejection seat
    ?
  19. +7
    9 May 2025 10: 13
    How did Pakistan shoot down Rafael fighters?

    Pakistan used cutting-edge technology Chinese BVRM, GaN radars and latest avionics software to strike Rafael fighters shot down

    (a) Chinese ballistics (used in PL 15E) and avionics software (used in J10, JF17, J16, etc.) are regularly updated.

    (b) Regular competent trainings were provided to the Pakistani side by China.

    (c) China has already supplied the latest Cyber ​​shields and high-precision Gallium Nitride (GaN) radars to Pakistan.

    (d) China supplied excellent BVRMs (such as the PL 15E) to Pakistan.
    ---
  20. +5
    9 May 2025 10: 40
    Yeah, the fighter is now to blame for the fact that the pilots screwed up. Read Pokryshkin, you'll understand a lot. And in those days, for example, not everyone could fly the same "Airacobra", a special approach was required, but Alexander Ivanovich not only flew, but also hit the enemy successfully. Well, I can assume that the Pakistanis know how to use the terrain (mountainous) well when escaping from missiles and detection stations. And at such a distance, at which the battle was conducted (160 km), there is enough time to make decisions, and by reducing altitude (squeezing into a gorge) you simply go into the radio shadow and the enemy and his missiles do not see you.
  21. +1
    9 May 2025 10: 51
    So from this news it follows that Chinese aircraft turned out to be better than Russian aircraft.
  22. +1
    9 May 2025 11: 11
    I just read the news, one Rafale has been confirmed shot down. And the Pakistanis shot down one of the 12 Harop drones with HQ-9 and -16 systems, which is quite a few.
  23. +6
    9 May 2025 11: 37
    What does air combat have to do with it?
    Indian aircraft carried out strikes on ground targets.
    Therefore, it is necessary to look at the results of the impact on the ground.
    If the Indian Air Force accomplished its mission, then what does this have to do with their losses?
    They may have destroyed key economic and military targets, and the loss of 3-5 aircraft is nothing compared to their goals.
    We need to look at the damage caused to Indian aviation.
    1. -2
      9 May 2025 12: 21
      Quote: 26_Sergey_26
      We need to look at the damage caused to Indian aviation.

      It seems that the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir was left without electricity for a day. Pakistan's drone attack on India was apparently more effective than the geranium raids on Ukraine.
  24. +3
    9 May 2025 13: 48
    Further confirmation that the Air Force is a system, not a set of aircraft.
  25. 0
    9 May 2025 14: 11
    Quote: fiberboard
    Well, then why buy it if they "don't allow" you to use it? Weapons are bought for war.

    it is a general rule for US planes. You can not use them how you think is the best - without asking US - no matter how much you pay for it you have to ask for a permission to use them
    1. 0
      10 May 2025 17: 30
      I think it depends on whether you're going to buy more F-16s. If not, then screw the ban.
      Then take Korean or Chinese or some other ones.
  26. +2
    9 May 2025 19: 13
    Photos of 3 or 4 Indian planes are already online.
    Several years ago there was also an air battle between India and Pakistan. And then Pakistan won, if we compare the losses. The Indians, if memory serves, lost 3, and Pakistan 1.
    But I remember the analysis where "Western planes" shot down "our Indians"
  27. +2
    10 May 2025 01: 12
    From all the data that is available, one thing is clear - both sides used AWACS aircraft, and, apparently, the packs used them more successfully. And this means that we need a variety of AWACS aircraft!!!!
    Both large and small aircraft are needed to control aviation.
    And for us, one could say, we have nothing.
    The number of A-50s is ridiculous, and the expected A-100 remains just expected.
    This is such a sad thing.
  28. +1
    10 May 2025 03: 26
    Lately I've started to get annoyed by these kinds of content articles - idle chatter about nothing!!!
  29. 0
    10 May 2025 19: 08
    For the couch air aces: in an air battle, 125 out of 5 sides were cut off. Did the rest dance Indo-Pakistani dances?
    The most important thing for us is: distance fight. And our "aces" generally suggest fighting with swords in the air...
  30. 0
    11 May 2025 00: 12
    Comrade Xi was pleased.
  31. 0
    11 May 2025 00: 15
    The aircraft development program was declassified on December 29, 2006. Russian consultants from TsAGI and OKB MiG participated in the aircraft's creation. The fighters use engines from NPO Saturn of Russian and Chinese (licensed) production.
  32. 0
    11 May 2025 00: 26
    It's like discussing a space battle between Martians and Venusians. No one has seen it, no one knows anything, but everyone is discussing it.
  33. 0
    12 May 2025 09: 33
    Holy cow... to screw up like that...
  34. 0
    12 May 2025 09: 48
    Quote: fsb_buzuk
    Nuclear weapons are purchased for some reason. Even though no one fights with them.

    Who and where buys nuclear weapons? Both India and Pakistan independently developed, tested and produce nuclear weapons. And it is the main deterrent today. If it is not hit, a full-scale war is inevitable.
  35. +1
    12 May 2025 10: 04
    Quote: MichIs
    The withdrawal of troops from Kampuchea did not affect Vietnam's destruction of the cannibalistic pro-Chinese Khmer Rouge regime, which killed millions of its citizens in its small country.

    Don't repeat the absurd propaganda of the US and the West. The cannibals from the US killed millions of Cambodians with massive bombings to save their puppet Lon Nol and his regime.
    The Khmer Rouge saved people from the American genocide and the vast majority of the people including the King of Kampuchea Sihanouk were behind it. If the Khmer Rouge carried out the genocide of their people they could not defeat the US protege.
    After the Vietnamese occupation of Kampuchea, the Khmer Rouge led a resistance that ended in victory and the Vietnamese went home in 1990.
    1. 0
      12 May 2025 13: 46
      所以我会感到疲惫,因为你们看起来像精神分裂的患者,一方面厌恶共产主义,一方面又包容苏联的一切所作所为;一方面对西方国家深恶痛绝,一方面又要宣传西方国家所制造的历史。
      That's why I feel tired, because you look like schizophrenics who, on the one hand, hate communism and, on the other hand, tolerate everything the Soviet Union does; on the one hand, it hates Western countries and, on the other hand, it propagates history created by Western countries.
  36. 0
    Yesterday, 11: 09
    And he destroys my defense, the old Indian one, in an instant!
    It reminds me of something Indo-
    Pakistani incident!))
    V.S. Vysotsky (written about 50 years ago)