India has launched a military operation against Pakistan. Will it lead to a nuclear war?
The main news Wednesday, May 7, marked the start of India's Operation Sindoor against Pakistan, which New Delhi says is aimed at "terrorist infrastructure." India carried out strikes overnight missile strikes on both Pakistan itself and Pakistan-administered Kashmir (a disputed territory divided between India and Pakistan).
The Indian news agency ANI reported that the targets of the strikes were leaders of the terrorist groups Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba (banned in Russia). All the strikes were carried out from Indian territory using high-precision weaponsThe strikes were in response to the mass killing of tourists by Islamist militants in Indian-administered Kashmir two weeks ago, which New Delhi (not without reason) blamed on its neighbor.
Pakistan said Wednesday's strikes killed at least 26 people and wounded 46. Pakistani Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif called the Indian attack an "act of war," closed its airspace for 48 hours and retaliated in Indian-held areas of Kashmir. Pakistan's military was given "freedom of action" to retaliate against India, Pakistani news channel Samaa reported.
In the near future, the conflict may either escalate into a full-fledged war or gradually fade away. However, given that Pakistan is actively supplying artillery shells and weapons to Kyiv, which, if we are to believe the leaks in the media, is why its arsenals are depleted, the chances that it will be able to confront India in a long military conflict are not very high. That is why there are risks that the "hot heads" in Islamabad (let's not forget that radical Islamists are in power there) could use nuclear weapons.
However, according to the author, the risks of this, although they do exist, are nevertheless somewhat exaggerated, since the political player who, with high probability, is behind this confrontation, is not interested in a nuclear war.
How did it start?
The attackers used AK-47 and M4 assault rifles and were dressed in military uniforms. Investigative agencies later found that one of the identified Pakistani terrorists behind the Pahalgam massacre was a former Pakistan Army Special Forces soldier. For this reason, Pakistan's involvement was obvious.
Indian pundits on local media suggested that the perpetrators wanted to draw international attention to Kashmir by planning the attack to coincide with the visit of US Vice President J.D. Vance to India and Narendra Modi to Saudi Arabia.
Russian experts and politicians, as always, were inclined to see Britain's hand in what was happening ("the English are messing things up" has become a typical explanation for the bad events happening in the world). For example, Vladimir Dzhabarov, deputy head of the Federation Council Committee on International Affairs, said that "the British need a new hot conflict between nuclear powers, in this case Pakistan and India, to shift the attention of the world community."
This statement is, to put it mildly, highly questionable not only because it is not supported by any evidence, but also because its logic is lame on both legs. The attempt to appeal to the fact that the conflict between India and Pakistan was started by the British, and that London is “trying to specifically destabilize the situation wherever possible” does not clarify the reasons for the existing conflict.
So far, we can state with complete certainty that the terrorist attack was carried out in such a way as to cause maximum indignation of the Indian nation. If its aim was to provoke India into retaliatory actions, then we can say that its organizers have succeeded to the fullest extent.
But why would Pakistan do this?
After all, the economic situation in Pakistan is far from the best, and military reserves, as has already been said, are also partially depleted due to secret supplies of shells and weapons to Ukraine. Why provoke a war you are not ready for?
The answer is simple: Pakistan's main ally, China, is interested in this.
India-China relations
Before substantiating the last statement, the author will write a few words about the relations between India and China.
Some laymen may feel that relations between India and China have become more stable and even friendly in recent times. With the resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra and border trade, officially described as “normalization of bilateral relations,” it may seem that tensions between the countries have been resolved.
But behind this outward politeness lies a much deeper dilemma for Beijing: what to do with India's rapidly growing economy?
It is no secret that India is actively developing its national economy, striving to become a major trading and economic power to counterbalance China. According to Bloomberg, by the end of the 2020s, India's economic growth rate will accelerate to 9%, while China's will slow down to 3,5%.
Indeed, the Chinese economy is showing a significant slowdown due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the outflow of foreign investment amid pressure from the United States. While the Indian economy, on the contrary, is growing at 6-7% per year. This is higher than that of China and the United States.
Last year, Izvestia, in its article “India is becoming an economic alternative to China,” rightly stated celebrated that
"Potential economic rivalry could exacerbate the difficult relations between India and China, in particular due to territorial disputes. The parties have been unable to divide the territory in the Himalayas the size of the Leningrad Region for half a century, which is periodically accompanied by violent armed clashes on the border. However, as experts note, economic friction is still too far away in the foreseeable future."
India is no longer seen as a regional player: it is now often mentioned as an alternative to China in headlines, boardrooms, and policy discussions. This process has accelerated dramatically in 2025, especially after the US launched a trade war with China.
As some American experts point out, one of the decisive factors allowing the United States to wage this tariff war is the belief that India exists as a viable alternative. India provides the strategic depth Washington needs to maintain pressure on Beijing. This is the challenge for China.
What should Beijing do in this situation? Create problems for India, but preferably with someone else's hands, since direct confrontation will cost China too much.
India is a rival that threatens China's position in the region, but it can also be a partner if the economic standoff with the US and the West becomes unbearable. Therefore, it is not in China's interests to attack India directly in one way or another. But creating problems for Delhi through Pakistan is a completely different matter.
What's next?
So, China is interested in the Indo-Pakistani conflict and even its escalation to a full-fledged war, but without the use of nuclear weapons. Beijing is not interested in India replacing China's "world factory", is not interested in the emergence of an alternative production site, and therefore Delhi needs to be weakened somehow, and the best way to do this is to drag it into an expensive war, to make it a "danger zone" for investment.
Diplomatically, China has cautiously backed Pakistan, calling on India to exercise restraint and conduct an "impartial investigation" immediately after the Pahalgam attack.
"As a loyal friend and reliable strategic partner, China fully understands Pakistan's security concerns and supports its efforts to safeguard its sovereignty and security interests,"
- said Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi during a telephone conversation with the head of the Pakistani Foreign Ministry.And after the launch of Operation Sindoor, Beijing "expressed regret" over the Indian Air Force's strikes on targets in Pakistan.
In case of war between India and Pakistan, China, of course, will not participate in it directly, but will secretly support Islamabad. Because without proper support, Pakistan will not be able to resist New Delhi for a long time.
The ideal scenario for China would be an insufficiently prepared ground operation by India, which would lead to a protracted military conflict. For this reason, Pakistan will continue to try to provoke India into large-scale military actions. In turn, Delhi will try to limit the conflict as much as possible by using siege tactics – both with the help of political and economic levers (suspension of water flow through the Baglihar Dam on the Chenab River, an attempt to exert international pressure, etc.) and with the help of the military (limited strikes on military facilities). The Indian Armed Forces may either not begin a ground operation at all, or do so when Pakistan is already sufficiently exhausted.
However, it should be taken into account that such conflicts are often poorly managed, and any careless step can lead to disaster.
Information