From the combat experience of the SVO - the South Vietnam version

17 506 10
From the combat experience of the SVO - the South Vietnam version


Nine days of one year


Saigon was once considered the capital of the pro-American regime - the semi-colonial South, but the confrontation with it in the socialist North - in the DRV, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, was not even considered a civil war. Hanoi relied on the active support of the USSR and China, while Saigon was oriented toward the collective West.



For Hanoi, the military actions were officially nothing more than an operation to clear "part of the territory of a single country of corrupt politicians and their accomplices." However, the special operation turned into a brutal fight with the army for many years, aviation и fleet U.S.A.


After colossal losses comparable to those in world wars, the US eventually abandoned its satellites in much the same way as many years later in Afghanistan, although there was practically no one left to abandon there. The results of the Vietnamese SVO itself were summed up a couple of years after the "American exodus" - between April 30 and May 8, 1975.

In those days, Saigon and the extreme south of South Vietnam, including the islands of Phu Quoc (near Cambodia), the remote Con Dao, Phu Quy, Tho Tu and Bai Dinh in the Gulf of Thailand – the South China Sea, were taken by the troops of the DRV – North Vietnam and South Vietnamese communist guerrillas. Let us recall that the latter were the armed force of the People's Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam, created in 1963–64.

The DRV leadership understood that the unification, and moreover, communist movement in South Vietnam could not be limited to military actions together with the allies from the North. If only because a direct invasion of the DRV into the South, no matter what it was called in Hanoi, would be regarded abroad as aggression.

And this, in turn, could well, as the DRV leaders believed, bring the republic under the "UN sanctions" of the West, although the guaranteed "veto" from the USSR and the PRC could reduce them to something like a decorative one. But it was not only and not so much the position of the West and "pro-Western" countries in itself that was frightening.


They could come back


The prospect of American troops returning to the South of Vietnam seemed much more frightening. Evacuated in 1972-73 to Thailand, the Philippines and South Korea, the American contingents were reorganized over the course of two years, receiving a new weapon and technology. In Washington, despite the beginning of "détente", they were thirsty for revenge.

Therefore, in Hanoi, anticipating the de-Americanization of South Vietnam and the reunification of the country, they supported the local communists and their armed forces in every possible way. And they did not focus exclusively on the invasion of the DRV army.

The US Navy and Air Force were ready to strike, fearing, perhaps, only an asymmetrical response from the USSR and China, which, however, would never have jointly supported the DRV. The grave consequences of Damansky and other conflicts were taking their toll. The last president of South Vietnam (1967-75), Nguyen Van Thieu, noted later:

"The DRV did not aim to separate any region of the Republic of Vietnam, nor to create its own military bases there. But exclusively to reunify Vietnam under communist leadership. That is why the main objective of Hanoi's military policy was to seize our capital."

And in his statement of April 21, 1975, it was noted "Hanoi's comprehensive policy of capturing South Vietnam, relying not only on North Vietnamese troops. With the two-faced policy of the United States and its allies towards the Republic of Vietnam, which refused to create a politically stable, economically powerful republic and a strong South Vietnamese army."

For Stalin, for Mao


According to available information, US emissaries unofficially proposed to the DRV in 1974-75 to include in its composition the territory of the Russian Federation up to the 12th parallel (the border before 1975 ran much further north – along the 17th parallel), that is, to keep about a third of the territory of South Vietnam under Saigon’s control.

But Hanoi immediately refused, realizing that the "Korean option" not with the 38th, but with the 12th parallel would leave the country and the nation divided for years to come. And the military actions of the DRV and its South Vietnamese allies against South Vietnam were assisted, especially at the last stage, by the troops of the "Red Khmers", which is not advertised these days.


"Cannibal" Pol Pot and the head of the Communist Party of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam Le Duan in Phnom Penh, 1975.

It was the representatives of the armed forces of Cambodia, today's Kampuchea, who allowed units of the DRV army and South Vietnamese detachments to freely advance on Saigon through the Cambodian-Vietnamese border in March-April 1975. In addition, the DRV army was helped by the rebels of the Stalinist-Maoist Communist Party of Thailand (Indo-Chinese impasse - American exodus).

Beginning in February-March 1975, these pro-Chinese and pro-Albanian guerrillas managed to interrupt the air corridor from American military bases in the east of that country to Cambodia and South Vietnam. It is known that similar actions by Thai guerrillas periodically took place during the US Indochina War (1964-73).

In general, not only the DRV troops but also the People's Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam, which by that time, more precisely in 1973, had managed to establish a provisional revolutionary government of South Vietnam, were advancing on Saigon and the adjacent regions and islands of South Vietnam.

As a result, it turned out that the initially limited in scale military special operation in the spring of 1975 turned into a full-fledged comprehensive victory. The success, by all indications, was predetermined by the fact that the Vietnamese SVO was not limited to military actions of the DRV army.

Moreover, actions were only in certain areas or on the islands of South Vietnam. The Vietnamese fought practically everywhere where it was required, accompanying combat operations with powerful ideological, not necessarily communist, propaganda.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 15+
    8 May 2025 04: 21
    Description of victory socialist North Vietnam is wonderful. The attempt to parasitize on it by calling it "SVO" is disgusting. The non-existent in the legal field some "SVO", with all its gestures of good will and Istanbul-Minsk agreements, is carried out by Yeltsin-Putin RF, Vietnam did not carry out any SVO. It carried out the Liberation War, or as it is also called, the war for the salvation of the Motherland.
    1. -2
      8 May 2025 23: 41
      Quote: Belisarius
      The attempt to parasitize on it by calling it "SVO" is disgusting.

      Why? Then Vietnam tried to free its country completely from the alien pro-Western governance of the comprador pro-American elite in Saigon. During the SVO Putin is trying to free the Russians in Ukraine from the national oppression of the Zelenskys, Tymoshenkos and the Umorovs-Akhmetovs.
      1. +2
        16 July 2025 10: 51
        And they want this freedom...
        We have enough of our own parasitic Olegarchs, and the leadership of Russia is free from the alien leadership of the West.
        1. -1
          16 July 2025 17: 25
          Quote: dimon642
          And they want this freedom...

          Russians in Ukraine must mimic and hide their views. SBU officers have the right to single-handedly sentence to death, torture and kill those suspected of Russophilia. Moreover, the local Kolomoiskys and Zelenskys increase the number of such investigators-executioners by one and a half times. And this SBU structure has begun to burden even Ukrainian nationalists who do not consider the interests of Jews and Armenians in Ukraine higher than Ukrainian interests. Farion and SBU officer Ivan Ivanovich were apparently killed not by FSB agents but by ordinary Ukrainians who do not agree with the policy of banning the Russian language and Orthodoxy promoted by the Jew Zelensky.
  2. +5
    8 May 2025 08: 11
    This is the impression I get from the article, either it was a bad Google translation or it was written by AI.
    1. +2
      8 May 2025 22: 24
      Lyosha, greetings. Regarding "AI` wrote". There is nothing surprising about this.
      Podymov and Chichkin are "very talented" guys, who resemble a mechanical mind.
      I would prefer that the authors were not Podymov-Chichkin, but Valery or V.O. THERE WAS 100% A HUMAN WRITING. There is talent there, but here, it feels like it was written by a mechanical author.
  3. +3
    8 May 2025 09: 00
    Will the abbreviation SVO now be applied to descriptions of armed conflicts of the past?
  4. Fat
    +3
    8 May 2025 09: 04
    Greetings. The article is well written, but it didn't go over well. Particularly sharp rejection was caused by the comparison of a special military operation with the actions of the North Vietnamese army. It looks like trying to fit a bird on a globe. And the cooperation of the Vietnamese with the Khmer Rouge is a masterpiece of political insight. The Khmer Rouge is a product of Mao's ideology and a product of the war waged by the Americans. The Vietnam War gave birth to the Khmer Rouge, but Vietnam defeated them after the death of the Chinese leader. China tried to teach Vietnam a lesson, but without success. But now everyone knows that a "socialist war" is not a fantasy.
    1. +1
      8 May 2025 22: 38
      Borisich, good health. How, aren't they ashamed to "torment a bird"
      I would prefer to stretch the authors onto a large globe.
      Borisich, I always feel sorry for birds and animals, but I can’t feel sorry for pseudo-authors.
  5. 0
    23 October 2025 09: 11
    The foundation of victory in the Vietnam War was ideology, which is prohibited by the American Constitution. You can change everything, but ideology is taboo.